Archive for March 2016

Do Terror Attacks Doom the European Union?

March 24, 2016

Do Terror Attacks Doom the European Union? Power LineJohn Hinderaker, March 23, 2016

Details continue to emerge regarding the recent terrorist bombings in Brussels, but the basic story is familiar. In Melbourne’s Herald Sun, columnist Andrew Bolt answers the question: Why Brussels?

Why Brussels? Why have Muslim terrorists in Brussels this week slaughtered 34 civilians in the city’s airport and underground?

Why did Muslim terrorists from Brussels earlier join the Islamic State attack in Paris that killed 130 people?

Why did a Muslim terrorist in Brussels kill four people at the city’s Jewish museum? Why did Muslim terrorists from Brussels have a deadly shootout with police last year and again last week? Why have an astonishing 450 Belgian Muslims–the vast majority from Brussels–served with Islamic State?

The answer? There are now 300,000 Muslims in Brussels. That’s why.

Brussels is Europe’s biggest Muslim city, home to a virtual colony large enough to sustain its own culture and hide entire networks of terrorists from the police. What’s more, the huge Muslim enclave is in a European country already torn between its Flemish and Walloon halves, making newcomers in this militantly multicultural land more likely to take refuge in their own ethnic identity, too.

Bolt argues that in the wake of mass Islamic immigration, it is too late for Europe:

The vast demographic experiment of the West–importing largely unskilled immigrants from an essentially hostile culture–has failed and cannot be undone.

Europe is now paying the deadly price. There have been mass murders by Muslim extremists in Madrid, London, Paris, Frankfurt, Copenhagen, Brussels and Toulouse.

There have been attacks on cartoonists in Denmark, riots against Jews in Paris, a rape epidemic in Scandinavia, pack attacks on women in Cologne and the assassination in Amsterdam of a film director who mocked Islam.

For Australia, Bolt writes, there is still hope, if that country “severely restrict[s] immigration from Muslim nations until we prove we can assimilate those here already,” and ends “[t]he state-sponsored denigration of Australia,” along with government-encouraged tribalization. The same prescription would seem to apply to the United States.

Meanwhile, persistent terrorism clouds the future of the European Union. The first duty of any government is to maintain order and protect its citizens. The EU’s inability to defend Europeans against Islamic terror, or even contribute seriously to that effort, makes starkly evident the fact that the EU is not a government, despite its nanny-state pretentions, and “Europe” is not a country.

But the reality is worse. Through the Schengen Treaty, the EU mandates open borders among member states. It thereby opens the door to terrorists, about whom it is powerless to do anything. With respect to the most basic duties of a state, the European Union is worse than useless. Thus, we are seeing the inevitable nationalist backlash across the continent, as Europeans try to re-institute borders and shore up the only authorities that have any ability to maintain security.

Too Late For GOP Moderates to Unite

March 23, 2016

Too Late For GOP Moderates to Unite, Commentary Magazine, March 23, 2016

(Another member of the Trump Hater’s Club appears to concede defeat. — DM)

Jeb-Cruz-TrumpImage by © ERIK S. LESSER/epa/Corbis

Had anyone told you a couple of months ago that Jeb Bush would endorse Ted Cruz, you’d have said they were crazy. But that old cliché about politics and strange bedfellows is as true today as it ever was. Bush’s support for the Texas senator would have been a really big deal had it been announced at any point prior to Super Tuesday. But after Donald Trump’s impressive run of victories over the last several weeks that continued last night in Arizona, the grudging backing of the Bush clan for Cruz is a classic case of too little, too late.

Coming on a day after Trump issued a vile threat about “spilling the beans” about some dirt he would throw at Cruz’s wife Heidi, this might be considered a moment when Republicans of all political stripes might rally around the cause of stopping a candidate that seems bereft of a shred of common decency. Though some have expected Trump to start behaving like a future president now that the nomination is within his grasp, it is clearly too much to ask for him to act like anything other than a vulgar thug.

But given the fact that a host of other similar statements — all of which individually should be treated as disqualifying Trump for the presidency — the latest infamous Trumpism isn’t likely to shake his hold on the affections of a plurality of GOP voters. That’s why the Bush endorsement changes nothing about the race. The same can be said of the endorsement of the Club for Growth.It’s the first time the influential libertarian advocacy group has picked a favorite in a presidential race and would have been a big boost to Cruz earlier in the election cycle. But the Bush move and the willingness of GOP moderates like Senator Lindsey Graham to host a Washington fundraiser for the scourge of the Senate Republican caucus, these developments are meaningless when set beside Trump’s stunning ability to keep winning Republican primaries.

Cruz could take some solace in winning Utah by a landslide as Mormon voters registered their disgust with Trump’s vulgar style as well as his insults of Mitt Romney’s faith. But even though he managed to win all 40 Utah delegates, Trump’s sweep of all 58 delegates from Arizona puts him that much closer to the 1,237 he needs to secure the GOP nomination.

The next big test will come two weeks from now in Wisconsin but even if Cruz wins there — a big if considering that he will face competition from John Kasich for the anti-Trump vote — the rest of April will be filled with primaries in Northeastern states where both the Texan and the Ohio governor — whose lack of a rationale for staying in the race becomes more obvious with every passing day — may not be competitive. Though Cruz may keep fighting until California votes on June 7, his quest to deny Trump a majority and keep the hope of a contested convention alive may be done long before then.

But the Bush endorsement and the behind the scenes maneuvering that sought to also get Marco Rubio behind Cruz illustrates everything that was all wrong about the effort to stop Trump. According to Politico, some in the Cruz camp — including Utah Senator Mike Lee — reached out to Rubio about the possibility of a joint ticket. But Rubio wasn’t interested. Just as Bush wasn’t interested in backing his former friend after he dropped out when Rubio might have benefitted from that endorsement before the Florida primary.

Given that Bush was a total flop as a presidential candidate despite raising and spending record amounts of money, his endorsement doesn’t carry much weight with GOP primary voters. Nor is there any reason to believe that a Rubio endorsement of Cruz would change the electoral map. The so-called establishment lane for which Bush, Rubio, Kasich, and Chris Christie were all competing didn’t turn out to have as many votes as many of us thought. It’s obvious that GOP voters wanted an outsider — whether a complete outlier like Trump or a Tea Party rebel like Cruz — not someone that could be depicted as a successor to Republican moderates like Romney or John McCain.

But all this back and forth involving Bush’s hurt feelings toward Rubio and Rubio’s possible resentment of Cruz just shows how clueless mainstream Republicans have been about the 2016 campaign. It was clear to some of us as early as last August that the GOP primary schedule could allow Trump to romp to the nomination by winning pluralities while his rivals divided the vote of Republicans that wanted a more qualified candidate. Yet throughout the campaign, the so-called moderate wing of the party was too caught up in the egos of the individual candidates and their delusions about Trump fading to draw some obvious conclusions.

Had counter-factual scenarios that involve an early Bush endorsement of Rubio or Rubio and Bush backing Cruz before Super Tuesday come to pass that might have produced a different result than Trump’s current ascendancy. But what’s misleading about this thinking is that it ignores the strength of Trump’s appeal to a critical mass of voters who don’t care about his lack of knowledge about the issues, his substituting empty slogans for serious positions, his lack of a presidential temperament or the fact that he is clearly bereft of any sense of personal honor (I’ll concede that’s an antique concept in our day and age, but it is one that the signers of the Declaration of Independence took seriously).

The notion of Trump inevitability is a narrative that was probably only enabled by the fecklessness of his opponents. There might have been a moment in this campaign when the squabbling band of GOP moderates could have made peace with Cruz and joined forces in a manner that might have made a difference. Bush, Rubio, Kasich and other Republicans that didn’t want their party to be led by a thug to a disastrous November rout should have put aside their egos and joined forces weeks, if not months ago. But to expect a consolidation of his opponents to alter the direction of the contest now that Trump is clearly on track to win the nomination outright is to engage in wishful thinking. When Trump ascends the podium in Cleveland to accept his party’s nomination — an event that seems more likely than ever today — GOP leaders will have no one but themselves to blame.

Brandon Tatum Tucson Police Officer Blasts ‘Hateful’ Anti – Donald Trump Protesters – Full Interview

March 23, 2016

Brandon Tatum Tucson Police Officer Blasts ‘Hateful’ Anti – Donald Trump Protesters – Full Interview, Fox News via You Tube, March 23, 2016

(Please see also, VIRAL VIDEO: Black cop tells the TRUTH about Trump rallies. — DM)

 

Obama Slams Ted Cruz For Proposing Surveillance Of U.S. Muslims

March 23, 2016

Source: Obama Slams Ted Cruz For Proposing Surveillance Of U.S. Muslims

President Barack Obama slammed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday for the presidential hopeful’s statements that he would empower law enforcement to “patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods“ in the wake of the deadly terror attacks in Brussels.

“I just left a country that engages in that kind of neighborhood surveillance, which, by the way, the father of Sen. Cruz escaped for America, the land of the free,” Obama said during a press conference in Argentina, referring to his historic trip to Cuba earlier this week.

He said the proposal “makes absolutely no sense” and goes against basic American values.

The Republican presidential candidate, a Cuban-American, has been deeply critical of Obama’s strategy to destroy the so-called Islamic State. He said Tuesday’s attacks in Brussels were more evidence that Obama needs to address the root of the problem.

“It is way past time we have a president who will acknowledge this evil and will call it by its name and use the full force and fury to defeat ISIS,” Cruz said in a press conference on Tuesday. “Until they are defeated, these attacks will continue. Their target is each and every one of us.”

“We need a president who sets aside political correctness,” Cruz insisted. “We don’t need another lecture about Islamophobia.”

Cruz’s comments drew fire from Muslim advocacy groups, Democrats, the police commissioner of New York City and even one of his rivals for the GOP nomination, Ohio Gov. John Kasich.

Obama also criticized proposals to bomb ISIS positions in Syria and Iraq indiscriminately. Cruz has called for “carpet bombing” terrorists, a strategy that would endanger civilians.

“We don’t go and blow something up just so we can say that we blew something up. That’s not a military strategy,” Obama said.

Cruz’s comments on Muslim surveillance come amid a wave of anti-Islamic sentiment in the United States, which has only grown with the candidacy of Donald Trump after last year’s terror attacks in Paris and mass shooting in San Bernardino, California. Reports about American Muslims facing violence, harassment and intimidation, especially, are on the uptick.

The contours of anti-Muslim sentiment have grown notably more partisan in recent years, with Republicans today more likely than they were in 2002 to say many U.S. Muslims are anti-American. In recent polls, Republicans are more than twice as likely as Democrats to express a strongly unfavorable view of the Islamic religion.

Republican voters are largely sympathetic to the Islamophobic opinions dominating their party’s national dialogue.

While Republicans in a January Pew survey blamed religious violence mostly on those who use religion as a justification, most also support Trump’s proposal for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the U.S. In state primary exit polls to date, between 63 percent and 78 percent of GOP voters agreed with such a ban.

Nearly two-thirds of Republican voters say the next president should “speak bluntly about Islamic extremists even if the statements are critical of Islam as a whole.”

This post has been updated with information about Americans’ views on anti-Muslim sentiment.

Ariel Edwards-Levy contributed to this report.

AP: ISIS has dispatched 400 trained fighters to attack Europe in wave of bloodshed

March 23, 2016

PARIS — ISIS has trained at least 400 fighters to target Europe in deadly waves of attacks, deploying interlocking terror cells like the ones that struck Brussels and Paris with orders to choose th…

Source: ISIS has dispatched 400 trained fighters to attack Europe in wave of bloodshed | FOX 61

 

PARIS — ISIS has trained at least 400 fighters to target Europe in deadly waves of attacks, deploying interlocking terror cells like the ones that struck Brussels and Paris with orders to choose the time, place and method for maximum carnage, The Associated Press has learned.

The network of agile and semiautonomous cells shows the reach of the extremist group in Europe even as it loses ground in Syria and Iraq. The officials, including European and Iraqi intelligence officials and a French lawmaker who follows the jihadi networks, described camps in Syria, Iraq and possibly the former Soviet bloc where attackers are trained to attack the West. Before being killed in a police raid, the ringleader of the Nov. 13 Paris attacks claimed to have entered Europe in a multinational group of 90 fighters, who scattered “more or less everywhere.”

But the biggest break yet in the Paris attacks investigation — the arrest on Friday of fugitive Salah Abdeslam— did not thwart the multipronged attack just four days later on the Belgian capital’s airport and metro that left 31 people dead and an estimated 270 wounded. Three suicide bombers also died.

Just as in Paris, Belgian authorities were searching for at least one fugitive in Tuesday’s attacks — this time for a man seen on security footage in the airport with the two suicide attackers. The fear is that the man, whose identity Belgian officials say is not known, will find Abdeslam’s path instructive.

After fleeing Paris immediately after the November attacks, Abdeslam forged a new network back in his childhood neighborhood of Molenbeek, long known as a haven for jihadis, and renewed plotting, according to Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynders

“Not only did he drop out of sight, but he did so to organize another attack, with accomplices everywhere. With suicide belts. Two attacks organized just like in Paris. And his arrest, since they knew he was going to talk, it was a response: So what if he was arrested? ‘We’ll show you that it doesn’t change a thing,’” said French Senator Nathalie Goulet, co-head of a commission tracking jihadi networks.

Estimates range from 400 to 600 Islamic State fighters trained specifically for external attacks, according to the officials, including Goulet. Some 5,000 Europeans have gone to Syria.

“The reality is that if we knew exactly how many there were, it wouldn’t be happening,” she said.

Two of the suicide bombers in Tuesday’s attacks, brothers Ibrahim and Khalid El Bakraoui, had no known extremist links until an apartment one of them rented was traced to Abdeslam last week, according to Belgian state broadcaster RTBF. Similarly, an Algerian killed inside that apartment on March 15 had nothing but a petty theft record in Sweden — but he’d signed up as an Islamic State suicide bomber for the group in 2014 and returned to Europe as part of the Nov. 13 plot.

In claiming responsibility, the Islamic State group described a “secret cell of soldiers” dispatched to Brussels for the purpose. The shadowy cells were confirmed by Europol — the EU police agency which said in a late January report that intelligence officials believed the group had “developed an external action command trained for special forces-style attacks.”

French speakers with links to North Africa, France and Belgium appear to be leading the units and are responsible for developing attack strategies in Europe, said a European security official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak about briefing material. He is also familiar with interrogations of former fighters who have returned to Europe. Some were jailed after leaving IS while others were kicked out of the terror group. The fighters include Muslims and Muslim converts from all across Europe.

Fighters in the units are trained in battleground strategies, explosives, surveillance techniques and counter surveillance, the security official said.

“The difference is that in 2014, some of these IS fighters were only being given a couple weeks of training,” he said. “Now the strategy has changed. Special units have been set up. The training is longer. And the objective appears to no longer be killing as many people as possible but rather to have as many terror operations as possible, so the enemy is forced to spend more money or more in manpower. It’s more about the rhythm of terror operations now.”

Similar methods had been developed by al-Qaida but IS has taken it to a new level, he said. Another difference with these “external operation” units is that fighters are being trained to be their own operators — not necessarily to be beholden to specific orders from the IS stronghold in Raqqa, Syria or elsewhere.

In the case of Tuesday’s attacks, Abdeslam’s arrest may have been a trigger for a plot that was already far along.

“This was not put together as a response to the arrest. However the timing of what has happened over the last few days has maybe hurried up the planning and execution,” said Magnus Ranstorp, a Swedish security analyst. “I see the link to the environments either in France or in Belgium. Whether they’re logistically linked … they’re probably part of the same batch of extremists that have come out of Syria.”

Several security officials have said there is growing evidence to suggest the bulk of the training is taking place in Syria, Libya and elsewhere in North Africa.

“To pull off an attack of this sophistication, you need training, planning, materials and a landscape,” said Shiraz Maher, a senior research fellow at the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation in London.

Maher has conducted extensive interviews with foreign fighters. The research center, based at Kings College in London, has one of the largest databases of fighters and their networks.

“Even if they worked flat out, the attackers in Brussels would have needed at least four days,” Maher said.

The question for many intelligence and security officials is now turning to just how many more fighters have been trained and are ready for more attacks.

A senior Iraqi intelligence official who was not authorized to speak publicly said people from the cell that carried out the Paris attacks are scattered across Germany, Britain, Italy, Denmark and Sweden. Recently, a new group crossed in from Turkey, the official said.

The latest new name to surface this week, Najim Laachraoui, turned out to be a Brussels resident with a degree in mechanical engineering — the bombmaker who made the suicide vests used in the Paris attacks, according to French and Belgian officials. Attackers used an explosive known as Triacetone Triperoxide, or TATP, made from common household chemicals.

Fifteen kilos of TATP were found in an apartment linked to the Brussels attackers, along with other explosive material, although Laachraoui has not been publicly linked to the latest attack.

And Laachraoui, like the unidentified man seen wearing a white jersey at the Brussels airport on Tuesday, remains at large, a fugitive link in a chain still being forged.

Terror in Brussels intelligence: What German mainstream media conceal the citizens of backgrounds

March 23, 2016

error in Brussels intelligence: What German mainstream media conceal the citizens of backgrounds,  Koop Online, March 23, 2016

(H/t Joopklepzeiker. This is a web translation. I have tried to make it more intelligible, but it’s still flawed. Perhaps the ideas come through. — DM)

The latest Brussels terrorist attacks have many people extremely distressed. Western security circles know thatParis and Brussels are only testing for an upcoming series of much larger terrorist attacks that will change the state of Europe for decades.The leaders know what is being planned in the background: attacks with Iridium 192nd.

Police officers stay on high alert in Brussels on March 22, 2016, after the Belgian capital was hit by terrorist attacks, for which Islamic State has claimed responsibility. More than 30 people were killed and about 230 others were injured in the two bomb attacks at an international airport and a subway station. (Kyodo)

Police officers stay on high alert in Brussels on March 22, 2016, after the Belgian capital was hit by terrorist attacks, for which Islamic State has claimed responsibility. More than 30 people were killed and about 230 others were injured in the two bomb attacks at an international airport and a subway station. (Kyodo)

Exactly three weeks ago US intelligence and Washington newspaper Washington Times disclosed that Belgian security authorities in anti-terror raids  have found evidence of planned attacks with “dirty bombs.”  The future attack plans therefore concern large cities in France, Belgium, Great Britain – and Germany. The metropolitan areas concerned would have uninhabitable areas after such an attack for months or even years rather than weeks. What does this mean, can hardly imagine safety circuits in reality itself.

It is also clear that Islamic terrorists in the past few weeks have witnessed nuclear professionals in a number of European nuclear power stations and wanted to kidnap at least one of them.

In reported American, British and  Belgian media – just no German. The Islamic state is trying for some time, a “dirty bomb” to build – and indeed in Europe . Since a few days the report  leading US journals about.

Two days before the Brussels attacks also have British special forces SAS practiced how to deal with an “in case of (expected) attack on London dirty bomb could do.” Because the British expect such a terrorist attack with radioactive material now “daily” .

And in Germany it is known to reduce the risk that one but rather conceals the public. European intelligence sources have pointed out to Kopp online that in recent weeks in Iraq (as well as in Syria) multiple radioactive material was stolen from atomic testing centers, which only appeared in some later.

Thus it is also clear that the IS in recent months had contacts with unscrupulous international arms dealers who have also material for nuclear weapons and dirty bombs on offer.  Since 2014 such acquisition attempts have been registered by Western intelligence agencies.

Even more: It is also known that Muslims Belgian base Kleine Brogel Airbase have spied (in Flanders in the province of Limburg), where the US kept ready in Belgium US nuclear weapons (which is hardly a Belgian site). They were inspired by reports in Belgian newspapers reported how lax the security arrangements are there.

Only in this context can be understood to say intelligence sources, why after the recent attacks immediately Brussels, Belgian nuclear power plants were first evacuated and then backed up by the Belgian Army . It is known that Muslims have spied on these to prepare an attack with nuclear materials and may want to also penetrate into the control room of a nuclear power plant.

Recently, after information of Kopp from the intelligence community in a special suitcase secure radioactive material that belonged to the Istanbul-based company SGS, was stolen.The contents:  ten grams Iridium-192, which is ideal for the construction of a “dirty bomb” .

The case became public – many other similar instances are not because a news blackout was imposed. Because a “dirty bomb” would cause panic and chaos, which would no longer be manageable for a government.

However, now missing for more than 500 grams of Iridium-192, the “inexplicably gone missing” are. Western intelligence agencies are convinced that the highly hazardous material now with the influx of refugees anywhere in Germany, was transported to Belgium or France.

The recent attacks, which our interlocutors are convinced are some “exercises” of IS-groups which want to study, for example, the reaction times of Western forces for attacks with “dirty bombs”. “The practice but currently only” our interlocutor says senior circles of the security authorities.

And he claims that it long ago informal discussions between senior representatives of the backers of the IS and European governments, according to which Europeans are blackmailed with attacks such as those in Paris and Brussels, the Europeans, so its details, are more Islamic mass immigration from the Middle East and North Africa allow – or their governments are made and swept incapacitated by increasingly frequent terrorist attacks and also “dirty bombs.” The asylum industry is accordingly buffo Islamic terrorists.

”It’s only a matter of time before terrorist groups gain access to nuclear weapons, the fact that so far with still no disaster: Meanwhile, the former director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Mohamed ElBaradei, said. such weapons had come, “we owe pure luck.” The open borders of Angela Merkel could end very quickly the happiness of Europeans now however.

The possible expiration of a stop with “dirty bombs” (eng.):

Obama Embarrasses Nation With Visit to Cuba

March 23, 2016

Obama Embarrasses Nation With Visit to Cuba, PJTV via You Tube, March 22, 2016

Why Belgium is Ground Zero for European Jihadis

March 23, 2016

Why Belgium is Ground Zero for European Jihadis

by Soeren Kern March 23, 2016 at 6:00 am

Source: Why Belgium is Ground Zero for European Jihadis

  • Growing numbers of Belgian Muslims live in isolated ghettos where poverty, unemployment and crime are rampant. In Molenbeek, the unemployment rate hovers at around 40%. Radical imams aggressively canvass in search of shiftless youths to wage jihad against the West.
  • “When we have to contact these people [European officials] or send our guys over to talk to them, we’re essentially talking with people who are… children. These are not pro-active, they don’t know what’s going on. They’re in such denial. It’s such a frightening thing to admit their country is being taken over.” — American intelligence official.
  • “Returned Syria fighters are a huge threat… It is absolutely unbelievable that our governments allow them to return… Every government in the West, which refuses to do so [lock them up], is a moral accessory if one of these monsters commits an atrocity. … Our citizens are in mortal danger if we do not restore control over our own national borders.” — Dutch MP Geert Wilders.

The terrorist attacks on the airport and metro in Brussels are casting a spotlight, once again, on Belgium’s ignominious role as a European haven for jihadists.

Several distinct but interconnected factors help explain why Brussels, the political capital of Europe, has emerged as the jihadist capital of Europe.

Scenes from the jihad on Belgium: The aftermath of yesterday’s bomb attacks at the Brussels airport (left) and a metro station (right).

Large Muslim Population

The Muslim population of Belgium is expected to reach 700,000 in 2016, or around 6.2% of the overall population, according to figures extrapolated from a recent study by the Pew Research Center. In percentage terms, Belgium has one of the highest Muslim populations in Western Europe.

In metropolitan Brussels — where roughly half of Belgium’s Muslims currently live — the Muslim population has reached 300,000, or roughly 25%. This makes Brussels one of the most Islamic cities in Europe.

Approximately 100,000 Muslims live in the Brussels district of Molenbeek, which has emerged as the center of Belgian jihadism.

Parallel Societies

Belgium’s radical Islam problem originated in the 1960s, when Belgian authorities encouraged mass migration from Turkey and Morocco as a source of cheap labor. They were later followed by migrants from Egypt and Libya.

The factories eventually closed, but the migrants stayed and planted family roots. Today, most Muslims in Belgium are the third- and fourth-generation offspring of the original migrants. While many Belgian Muslims are integrated into Belgian society, many others are not.

Growing numbers of Belgian Muslims live in marginal districts — isolated ghettos where poverty, unemployment and crime are rampant. In Molenbeek, the unemployment rate hovers at around 40%. Radical imams aggressively canvass the area in search of shiftless youths to wage jihad against the West.

Salafism

As in other European countries, many Muslims in Belgium are embracing Salafism — a radical form of Islam — and its call to wage violent jihad against all nonbelievers for the sake of Allah.

Salafism takes its name from the Arabic term salaf, which means predecessors or ancestors — meaning of Mohammed. Salafists trace their roots to Saudi Arabia, the Mohammed’s birthplace. They glorify an idealized vision of what they claim is the true, original Islam, practiced by the earliest generations of Muslims, including Mohammed and his companions and followers, in the 7th and 8th centuries. The aim of Salafism is to recreate a pure form of Islam in the modern era.

This goal presents serious problems for modern, secular and pluralistic states. A recent German intelligence report defined Salafism as a “political ideology, the followers of which view Islam not only as a religion but also a legal framework which regulates all areas of life: from the state’s role in organizing relations between people, to the private life of the individual.”

The report added: “Salafism rejects the democratic principles of separation of state and religion, popular sovereignty, religious and sexual self-determination, gender equality and the fundamental right to physical integrity.”

Although Salafists make up only a small fraction of Europe’s burgeoning Muslim community, authorities are increasingly worried that many of those attracted to Salafi ideology are impressionable young Muslims who may be receptive to calls for violence in the name of Islam.

Sharia4Belgium

Before the rise of the Islamic State, the best-known Salafist group in Belgium was Sharia4Belgium, which played an important role in radicalizing Belgian Muslims.

Sharia4Belgium was outlawed in February 2015, when its leader, Fouad Belkacem, was sentenced to 12 years in prison. A partial archive of the group’s former website can be found at the Internet Archive. There Sharia4Belgium issues an invitation to all Belgians to convert to Islam and submit to Sharia law or face the consequences. The text states:

“It is now 86 years since the fall of the Islamic Caliphate. The tyranny and corruption in this country [Belgium] has prevailed; we go from one scandal to another: Economic crises, paedophilia, crime, growing Islamophobia, etc.

“As in the past we [Muslims] have saved Europe from the dark ages, we now plan to do the same. Now we have the right solution for all crises and this is the observance of the divine law, namely Sharia. We call to implement Sharia in Belgium.

“Sharia is the perfect system for humanity. In 1,300 years of the Islamic state we knew only order, welfare and the protection of all human rights. We know that Spain, France and Switzerland knew their best times under Sharia. In these 1,300 years, 120 women were raped, which is equal to 120 women a day in Europe. There were barely 60 robberies recorded in 1,300 years.

“As a result, we invite the royal family, parliament, all the aristocracy and every Belgian resident to submit to the light of Islam. Save yourself and your children of the painful punishment of the hereafter and grant yourself eternal life in paradise.”

A cache of the background image for the Sharia4Belgium website has the black flag of jihad flying above the Belgian Parliament. Until recently, the Sharia4Belgium YouTube page (also shut down) was used to incite Muslims to jihad. The group had posted videos with titles such as, “Jihad Is Obligatory,” “Encouraging Jihad,” “Duelling & Guerrilla Warfare,” and “The Virtues of Martyrdom.” Thus Sharia4Belgium paved the way for the Islamic State in Belgium.

Belgian Jihadists

One of the smallest countries in Western Europe, Belgium has become Europe’s biggest per capita source of jihadists fighting in Syria and Iraq. According to data provided by Interior Minister Jan Jambon on February 22, 2016, 451 Belgian citizens have been identified as jihadists. Of these, 269 are on the battlefields in Syria or Iraq; 6 are believed currently to be on their way to the war zone; 117 have returned to Belgium; and 59 attempted to leave but were stopped at the border.

According to Jambon, 197 of the jihadists are from Brussels: 112 are in Syria while 59 have returned to Belgium. Another 195 jihadists are from Flanders: 133 are in Syria while 36 have returned.

Belgium is the EU’s leading supplier of jihadists to the Islamic State per capita: around 40 jihadists per million inhabitants, compared to Denmark (27), Sweden (19), France (18), Austria (17), Finland (13); Norway (12), UK (9.5), Germany (7.5) and Spain (2).

Official Incompetence?

During the past 24 months, at least five jihadist attacks have been linked to Belgium. In May 2014, jihadists attacked the Jewish Museum in Brussels. In August 2014, a jihadist with links to Molenbeek attacked an Amsterdam-to-Paris train. In January 2015, Belgian police carried out an anti-jihadist raid in Verviers, Belgium.

In November 2015, it emerged that two of the eight jihadists who struck Paris were residents of Brussels. Police on March 18 arrested Salah Abdeslam, a Belgian-born French national of Moroccan origin, for his role in the Paris attacks. He had been months on the run. On March 22, jihadists once again struck Brussels.

After the Paris attacks in November 2015, Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel said: “There is almost always a link with Molenbeek. That’s a gigantic problem. Apart from prevention, we should also focus more on repression.”

Interior Minister Jambon added:

“We don’t have control of the situation in Molenbeek at present. We have to step up efforts there as a next task. I see that [Molenbeek] Mayor Françoise Schepmans is also asking our help, and that the local police chief is willing to cooperate. We should join forces and ‘clean up’ the last bit that needs to be done, that is really necessary.”

The latest attack in Brussels, however, indicates that Belgian authorities still do not have the jihadist problem under control.

A Belgian counterterrorism official said that due to the small size of the Belgian government and the large numbers of ongoing investigations, virtually every police detective and military intelligence officer in the country was focused on international jihadi investigations. He added:

“We just don’t have the people to watch anything else and, frankly, we don’t have the infrastructure to properly investigate or monitor hundreds of individuals suspected of terror links, as well as pursue the hundreds of open files and investigations we have. It’s literally an impossible situation and, honestly, it’s very grave.”

An American intelligence official reportedly said that working with security officials there was like working with children:

“Even with the EU in general, there’s an infiltration of jihadists that’s been happening for two decades. And now they’re just starting to work on this. When we have to contact these people or send our guys over to talk to them, we’re essentially talking with people who are — I’m just going to put it bluntly — children. These are not pro-active, they don’t know what’s going on. They’re in such denial. It’s such a frightening thing to admit their country is being taken over.”

In November 2015, the New York Times published a scathing analysis of Belgian incompetence. It emerged that a month before the Paris attacks, Molenbeek Mayor Schepmans received a list with the names and addresses of 80 jihadists living in her district. The list included two brothers who would later take part in the November 13 attacks in Paris.

According to the Times, Schepmans said: “What was I supposed to do about them? It is not my job to track possible terrorists. That is the responsibility of the federal police.” The Times continued: “The federal police service, for its part, reports to the interior minister, Jan Jambon, a Flemish nationalist who has doubts about whether Belgium — divided among French, Dutch and German speakers — should even exist as a single state.”

An Artificial State

Belgium, nestled between France, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, was established in 1830 to serve as a neutral buffer state between the geopolitical rivals, France and Germany. Belgium’s role as a buffer state effectively came to an end after the end of the Second World War and the subsequent move toward European integration. Over time, Brussels emerged as the de facto capital of the European Union.

For the past three decades, Belgium has faced an existential crisis due to growing antagonism between the speakers of Dutch and French. One observer wrote:

“The country operates on the basis of linguistic apartheid, which infects everything from public libraries to local and regional government, the education system, the political parties, national television, the newspapers, even football teams. There is no national narrative in Belgium, rather two opposing stories told in Dutch or French. The result is a dialogue of the deaf.”

This dysfunction extends to Belgian counter-terrorism. The New York Times observed:

“With three uneasily joined populations, Belgium has a dizzying plethora of institutions and political parties divided along linguistic, ideological or simply opportunistic lines, which are being blamed for the country’s seeming inability to get a handle on its terrorist threat.

“It was hardly difficult to find the two Molenbeek brothers before they helped kill 130 people in the Paris assaults: They lived just 100 yards from the borough’s City Hall, across a cobblestone market square in a subsidized borough-owned apartment clearly visible from the mayor’s second-floor corner office. A third brother worked for Ms. Schepmans’s borough administration.

“Much more difficult, however, was negotiating the labyrinthine pathways that connect — and also divide — a multitude of bodies responsible for security in Brussels, a capital city with six local police forces and a federal police service.

“Brussels has three Parliaments, 19 borough assemblies and the headquarters of two intelligence services — one military, one civilian — as well as a terrorism threat assessment unit whose chief, exhausted and demoralized by internecine turf battles, resigned in July but is still at his desk.

“Lost in the muddle were the two brothers, Ibrahim Abdeslam, who detonated a suicide vest in Paris, and Salah, who is the target of an extensive manhunt that has left the police flailing as they raid homes across the country.”

The language issue also affects integration. As a Washington Post analysis explains, “Many jobs in Brussels require knowledge of French, Flemish or Dutch, and now sometimes English, too, while most immigrants speak mostly Arabic and some French. That has blocked integration.”

Open Borders

The so-called Schengen Agreement, which allows for passport-free travel throughout most of the European Union, has allowed jihadists posing as migrants to enter Europe through Greece and make their way to northern Europe virtually undetected.

In an interview with Breitbart London, Dutch Politician Geert Wilders, currently on trial in the Netherlands for free speech, said:

“Returned Syria fighters are a huge threat. They are dangerous predators roaming our streets. It is absolutely unbelievable that our governments allow them to return. And it is incredible that, once returned, they are not imprisoned.

“In the Netherlands, we have dozens of these returned jihadists. Our government allows most of them to freely walk our streets and refuses to lock them up. I demand that they be detained at once. Every government in the West, which refuses to do so, is a moral accessory if one of these monsters commits an atrocity.

“The government must also close our national borders. The European Union’s Schengen zone, where no border controls are allowed, is a catastrophe. The Belgian Moroccan Salah Abdeslam, the mastermind of last November’s bloodbath in Paris, travelled freely from Belgium to the Netherlands on multiple occasions last year.

Wilders concluded: “This is intolerable. Open borders are a huge safety risk. Our citizens are in mortal danger if we do not restore control over our own national borders.”

Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute. He is also Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook and on Twitter. His first book, Global Fire, will be out in 2016.

The Obama Doctrine Applied

March 23, 2016

The Obama Doctrine Applied, Power LineScott Johnson, March 23, 2016

In the immediate aftermath of the terror attacks in Brussels yesterday, President Obama gave a previously scheduled speech in Havana “To the People of Cuba.” The speech contrasts rather starkly with the speech suggested by Professor Carlos Eire in “The speech never given,” to the detriment of Obama’s speech.

Obama’s speech wasn’t all bad. Though full of nauseating palaver, it had a good paragraph or two. To the mostly nauseating palaver and gratuitous autobiographical reflections in the prepared text of the speech, Obama tacked on formulaic vacuities to acknowledge the morning’s events in Brussels:

Before I begin, please indulge me. I want to comment on the terrorist attacks that have taken place in Brussels. The thoughts and the prayers of the American people are with the people of Belgium. We stand in solidarity with them in condemning these outrageous attacks against innocent people. We will do whatever is necessary to support our friend and ally, Belgium, in bringing to justice those who are responsible. And this is yet another reminder that the world must unite, we must be together, regardless of nationality, or race, or faith, in fighting against the scourge of terrorism. We can — and will — defeat those who threaten the safety and security of people all around the world.

That’s it. The White House posted video of Obama’s remarks on the attacks here. The video runs for 51 seconds.

Having given the speech, President Obama kept his previously scheduled date with Raul Castro to attend the Rays-Cuba baseball game in Havana. At the game Obama schmoozed with Castro. What a sickening sight. On the plus side, however, Obama didn’t throw out the opening pitch.

Obama commented on the attacks in Brussels to ESPN during the game (video below, about ten minutes). He didn’t appear to be to broken up about them.

“This is just one more example of why the entire world needs to unite against these terrorists,” Obama said. “The notion that any political agenda would justify the killing of innocent people like this is something that’s beyond the pale.” Obama imputes a simply “political agenda” to the attack. Their religious inspiration has been drained from them.

Obama explained why he attended the game as planned: “It’s always a challenge when you have a terrorist attack anywhere in the world, particularly in this age of 24/7 news coverage, you wanna be respectful and understand the gravity of the situation but the whole premise of terrorism is to try to disrupt people’s ordinary lives.”

 

 

One of the illuminating passages in Jeffrey Goldberg’s compilation of the wit and wisdom of Barack Obama addresses the subject of terrorism. When it comes to terrorism, this is “the Obama doctrine.” Cool out and learn to live with it. His attitude is complacent. His take on ISIS to Valerie Jarrett represents it: “They’re not coming here to chop our heads off.”

Goldberg adds: “Obama frequently reminds his staff that terrorism takes far fewer lives in America than handguns, car accidents, and falls in bathtubs do. Several years ago, he expressed to me his admiration for Israelis’ ‘resilience’ in the face of constant terrorism, and it is clear that he would like to see resilience replace panic in American society. Nevertheless, his advisers are fighting a constant rearguard action to keep Obama from placing terrorism in what he considers its ‘proper’ perspective, out of concern that he will seem insensitive to the fears of the American people.”

Islam must of course be kept out of the equation. Obama hesitates to confide in us regarding the contribution of Islam to the jihad with which we are contending. We can’t be trusted to deal fairly with it. Goldberg reports that those who speak with Obama about jihadist thought say that he possesses a no-illusions understanding of the forces that drive apocalyptic violence among radical Muslims, but he has been careful about articulating that publicly, out of concern that he will exacerbate anti-Muslim xenophobia (i.e., “Islamophobia”).

The ESPN interview adds Obama’s irritated observation on the role of cable news in aggravating our concerns about terrorism. Taken together, his comments to the ESPN interviewers perfectly represent the application of the Obama doctrine on terrorism to the Brussel attacks.

Race is never far from Obama’s mind. Let me insert here this stray quotable quote from the ESPN interview (my transcription): “Now we still have a long way to go. You know, that’s true in everyday life; it’s true in our sports. You know, if you look at the number of African-American managers, if you look at the number of Latino managers, in baseball, or owners, obviously there’s still a carryover from the past.”

Via Daniel Halper/Weekly Standard.

Poll: Most Republicans want the GOP to unite behind Trump

March 23, 2016

Poll: Most Republicans want the GOP to unite behind Trump, Washington ExaminerGabby Morrongiello, March 23, 2016

More than half of Republican voters believe the GOP is best off choosing Donald Trump as its 2016 presidential nominee if he arrives at the convention with the most delegates, according to a new poll.

In the latest Monmouth University national poll of Republican voters, 54 percent say their party should nominate the current GOP front-runner if he continues to lead the delegate count come July. Another 34 percent would prefer a contested convention in which someone other than Trump emerges as the nominee.

Of the voters who oppose Trump’s candidacy, 55 percent want someone other than the billionaire nominated at the convention, while 31 percent of that group still believe the party should nominate Trump if he has the highest delegate count.

The candidate most Trump opponents want as their nominee is Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. Thirty-three percent of voters in favor of a contested convention would like Cruz to be the GOP nominee, 23 percent would like Ohio Gov. John Kasich, and 10 percent want Florida Sen. Marco Rubio.

Slightly more GOP voters would want former Republican nominee Mitt Romney to again represent the party in the general election than would former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.

Should the Republican National Convention include multiple rounds of voting on the convention floor and lead someone other than Trump to secure the nomination, a combined 47 percent of Trump supporters would either vote for a third-party candidate or likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, or not vote at all in November.

Only 43 percent said they would commit to backing another candidate as the GOP nominee in the general election.

“A majority of non-Trump supporters seem to be in favor of a brokered convention process at this point in the campaign,” Monmouth University polling director Patrick Murray said in a statement. “That would probably throw the party into turmoil with many Trump supporters abandoning the party.”

The same survey shows Trump holding a steady lead nationally over his remaining two opponents. The real estate mogul, who won the Arizona primary Tuesday night but lost to Cruz in Utah, draws 41 percent support among Republican voters. Cruz draws 29 percent – double what it last December – and Kasich draws 18 percent support.