Archive for March 2, 2015

US-Israel intel cooperation on Iran’s nuclear program has been stopped, Ch. 10 reports

March 2, 2015

US-Israel intel cooperation on Iran’s nuclear program has been stopped, Ch. 10 reports – Israel News – Jerusalem Post.

The reported halt in intelligence cooperation comes amid tensions over Iran talks, Netanyahu’s speech to Congress.

The United States and Israel have stopped intelligence cooperation on Iran’s nuclear program, Channel 10 reported Monday.

The reported halt in intelligence cooperation comes amid tensions in the relationship between Israel and the administration of US President Barack Obama over differences of opinion on an emerging diplomatic deal with Iran and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to the US Congress in which he is expected to speak out against such a deal on Tuesday.

The intelligence cooperation between the two countries has helped the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency collect information for reports on Iran’s nuclear program in the past, according to Channel 10. These same IAEA reports helped convince the international community to support sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program.

The White House has expressed fears in closed conversations that Netanyahu will reveal secret details of the talks with Iran during his speech to Congress on Tuesday, Channel 10 added.

Comments from US Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday appeared to contradict the Channel 10 report. In an interview with ABC, he said that the Israel-US security relationship was stronger than at any other time in the history of the two-countries.

In his speech to the AIPAC policy conference in Washington on Monday, Netanyahu as well cited security cooperation and intelligence sharing between the US and Israel as proof that the countries maintain a close relationship despite differences of opinion on Iran.

Despite both Israel and  the US publicly trying to downplay their differences, the White House has referred to Netanyahu’s visit to Washington as a “circus” that the Obama administration wants nothing to do with, Channel 10 reported.

The administration’s anger at Netanyahu’s visit is so severe, according to the report, that in addition to refusing to meet the Israeli prime minister during his stay in Washington, the US president does not even intend on calling Netanyahu during his visit.

Cartoon of the day

March 2, 2015

The Jewish Press, March 2, 2015

 

bibis-speech

The strategic genius of Iran’s supreme leader

March 2, 2015

The strategic genius of Iran’s supreme leader, The Washington Post, Ray Takeyh, March 1, 2015

(Please see also Adolph Hitler. However, a genius at strategy was not needed to best Obama. The words “thirty pieces of silver” keep going through my head. I wonder why.– DM)

As Khamenei held firm . . . the great powers grew wobbly. With the advent of the Joint Plan of Action in November 2013, Iran’s fortunes began to change.

As Khamenei presses toward an accord that will place him in an enviable nuclear position, he can also be assured that technical violations of his commitments would not be firmly opposed. Once a deal is transacted, the most essential sanctions against Iran will evaporate. It is unlikely that Europeans, much less China or Russia, would agree to their reconstitution should Iran be caught cheating. And as far as the use of force is concerned, the United States has negotiated arms-control compacts for at least five decades and has never used force to punish a state that has incrementally violated its treaty obligations. As the reaction to North Korea’s atomic provocations shows, the international community typically deals with such infractions through endless mediation. Once an agreement is signed, too many nations become invested in its perpetuation to risk a rupture.

*********************

On the surface, there is not much that commends Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. An anti-Semite, he has frequently questioned the Holocaust and defamed Israel in despicable terms. As a conspiracy theorist, he endlessly weaves strange tales about the United States and its intentions. As a national leader, he has ruthlessly repressed Iran’s once-vibrant civil society while impoverishing its economy. And yet Khamenei is also a first-rate strategic genius who is patiently negotiating his way to a bomb.

After years of defiance, Khamenei seems to appreciate that his most advantageous path to nuclear arms is through an agreement. To continue to build up his atomic infrastructure without the protective umbrella of an agreement exposes Iran to economic sanctions and the possibility of military retribution. While in the past Khamenei may have been willing to cross successive U.S. “red lines,” the price of such truculence was financial stress that he feared could provoke unrest. Unlike many of his Western interlocutors, Khamenei appreciates that his regime rests on shaky foundations and that the legitimacy of the Islamic revolution has long been forfeited. The task at hand was to find a way to forge ahead with a nuclear program while safeguarding the regime and its ideological verities.

In many ways, a nuclear agreement is the answer to Khamenei’s multiplicity of dilemmas. A good agreement for the supreme leader, however, has to be technologically permissive and of a limited duration. Since the exposure of Iran’s illicit nuclear program in 2002, its disciplined diplomats have insisted that any accord must be predicated on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which, in their telling, grants Iran the right to construct a vast nuclear infrastructure. In exchange for such a “right,” they would be willing to concede to an inspection regime within the leaky confines of the NPT. And for much of that time, the great powers rebuffed such presumptions from a state that has been censured by numerous U.N. Security Council resolutions and denies the International Atomic Energy Agency reliable access to its facilities and scientists.

As Khamenei held firm, however, the great powers grew wobbly. With the advent of the Joint Plan of Action in November 2013, Iran’s fortunes began to change. Washington conceded to Iran’s enrichment at home and agreed that eventually that enrichment capacity could be industrialized. The marathon negotiations since have seen Iran attempt to whittle down the remaining restrictions, while the United States tries to reclaim its battered red lines. For Khamenei, the most important concession that his negotiators have won is the idea of a sunset clause. Upon the expiration of that clause, there would be no legal limits on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. If the Islamic Republic wants to construct hundreds of thousands of sophisticated centrifuges, build numerous heavy-water reactors and sprinkle its mountains with enrichment installations, the Western powers will have no recourse. And once Iran achieves that threshold nuclear status, there is no verification regime that is guaranteed to detect a sprint to a bomb. An industrial-size nuclear state has too many atomic resources, too many plants and too many scientists to be reliably restrained.

As Khamenei presses toward an accord that will place him in an enviable nuclear position, he can also be assured that technical violations of his commitments would not be firmly opposed. Once a deal is transacted, the most essential sanctions against Iran will evaporate. It is unlikely that Europeans, much less China or Russia, would agree to their reconstitution should Iran be caught cheating. And as far as the use of force is concerned, the United States has negotiated arms-control compacts for at least five decades and has never used force to punish a state that has incrementally violated its treaty obligations. As the reaction to North Korea’s atomic provocations shows, the international community typically deals with such infractions through endless mediation. Once an agreement is signed, too many nations become invested in its perpetuation to risk a rupture.

Iran’s achievements today are a tribute to the genius of an unassuming midlevel cleric. In a region where many dictatorial regimes have collapsed, the Islamic Republic goes on. Khamenei is in command of the most consequential state from the Persian Gulf to the banks of the Mediterranean. He has routinely entered negotiations with the weakest hand and emerged in the strongest position. God is indeed great.

Netanyahu, Not Obama, Speaks for Us

March 2, 2015

Netanyahu, Not Obama, Speaks for Us, National Review On Line, Quin Hilleyer, March 2, 2015

Benjamin Netanyahu of course speaks first for Israel, but he speaks also for you and for me, for decency and humaneness, and for vigilance and strength against truly evil adversaries. Congress, by inviting him, is wise. Obama, by opposing him, is horribly wrong. And the civilized world, if it ignores him, will be well-nigh suicidal.

************************

While under fierce attack from President Obama, the Israeli prime minister defends Western values and speaks the truth about Iran.

The leader of the free world will be addressing Congress on Tuesday. The American president is doing everything possible to undermine him.

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu leads a nation surrounded by enemies, a nation so small that it narrows at one point to just 9.3 miles. Yet, in a world where the Oval Office is manned by someone openly apologetic for most American exercises of power; and where Western Europe’s economy is enervated, its people largely faithless, and its leadership feckless; and where Freedom House has found “an overall drop in [global] freedom for the ninth consecutive year,” the safeguarding of our civilization might rely more on leaders who possess uncommon moral courage than on those who possess the most nukes or biggest armies.

Right now, nobody on the world stage speaks for civilization the way Netanyahu does. While Barack Obama babbles about the supposedly “legitimate grievances” of those who turn to jihad, Netanyahu talks like this (from his speech to the United Nations on September 27, 2012):

The clash between modernity and medievalism need not be a clash between progress and tradition. The traditions of the Jewish people go back thousands of years. They are the source of our collective values and the foundation of our national strength.

At the same time, the Jewish people have always looked towards the future. Throughout history, we have been at the forefront of efforts to expand liberty, promote equality, and advance human rights. We champion these principles not despite of our traditions but because of them.

We heed the words of the Jewish prophets Isaiah, Amos, and Jeremiah to treat all with dignity and compassion, to pursue justice and cherish life and to pray and strive for peace. These are the timeless values of my people and these are the Jewish people’s greatest gift to mankind.

Let us commit ourselves today to defend these values so that we can defend our freedom and protect our common civilization.

When Hamas fired thousands of rockets into Israel last year, Netanyahu, in his necessary military response, did something almost unprecedented in the history of warfare. As he accurately described in his U.N. speech last year, on September 29:

Israel was doing everything to minimize Palestinian civilian casualties. Hamas was doing everything to maximize Israeli civilian casualties and Palestinian civilian casualties. Israel dropped flyers, made phone calls, sent text messages, broadcast warnings in Arabic on Palestinian television, always to enable Palestinian civilians to evacuate targeted areas.

No other country and no other army in history have gone to greater lengths to avoid casualties among the civilian population of their enemies.

As Barack Obama complains (with scant grasp of the historical context) about how Christians were such gosh-darn meanies a thousand years ago in the Crusades, Netanyahu protects the ability of Muslims today to have free access to the Old City of Jerusalem, even as Jews and Christians are prohibited from visiting the Temple Mount. At the beginning of his first term, in his first trip overseas as president, Obama delivered a speech to Turkey’s parliament, under the thumb of the repressive Tayyip Erdogan. “The United States is still working through some of our own darker periods in our history,” he confessed, sounding like America’s therapist-in-chief. “Our country still struggles with the legacies of slavery and segregation, the past treatment of Native Americans.”

Netanyahu, in contrast, in a 2011 Meet the Press interview, offered unabashed words of praise for the United States: “Israel is the one country in which everyone is pro-American, opposition and coalition alike. And I represent the entire people of Israel who say, ‘Thank you, America.’ And we’re friends of America, and we’re the only reliable allies of America in the Middle East.” (Netanyahu was accurate in his description of how much Israelis appreciate Americans, as I saw last summer during a visit to the country.)

In thanking America, Netanyahu was not posturing for political advantage. Netanyahu — who spent far more of his formative years on the American mainland than Obama did, and who took enemy fire at the age when Obama was openly pushing Marxist theory, and who learned and practiced free enterprise at the same age when Obama was practicing and teaching Alinskyism — has spoken eloquently for decades in praise of the Western heritage of freedom and human rights. He also speaks and acts, quite obviously, to preserve security — for Israel, of course, but more broadly for the civilized world. On Tuesday, as he has done for more than 30 years, Netanyahu will talk about the threat to humanity posed by Iran.

It’s mind-boggling to imagine that any national leader in the free world would fail to understand the danger. The ayatollahs have never backed down from their stated aim of destroying Christendom. They have never wavered from their depiction of the United States as the “Great Satan.” Just last week, Iran bragged about its recent test-firing of “new strategic weapons” that it says will “play a key role” in any future battle against the “Great Satan U.S.”

Iran also continues developing, while trying to keep them secret, new missiles and launch sites with devastatingly long-range capability. It continues to enrich uranium, including an allegedly secret program, to a level that’s a short jump-step from bomb strength. It has a lengthy record of lying and cheating about its military activities, its compliance with U.N. mandates (not that the U.N. is worth much anyway), and its protections of even the limited human rights it actually recognizes as such.

About the only thing Iran never lies about is its absolute, unyielding determination to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. It was only a few months ago, for example, that the “revolutionary” regime’s “Supreme Leader,” the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, released a nine-point plan for how to “annihilate” the Jewish state.

Yet Obama not only begrudges the Israeli prime minister the opportunity to make his case against this existential threat to his nation, but he conducts a diplomatic and political assault against Netanyahu of a ferocity rarely seen in the annals of American foreign policy. Obama’s actions aren’t just wrongheaded; they are malignant. They pervert American tradition and American interests, and they attempt to deprive the entire free world of its single most clarion voice for enlightenment values.

Benjamin Netanyahu of course speaks first for Israel, but he speaks also for you and for me, for decency and humaneness, and for vigilance and strength against truly evil adversaries. Congress, by inviting him, is wise. Obama, by opposing him, is horribly wrong. And the civilized world, if it ignores him, will be well-nigh suicidal.

AIPAC PC 2015 Monday Morning Session

March 2, 2015

U.N. nuclear watchdog says Iran still withholding key information

March 2, 2015

 U.N. nuclear watchdog says Iran still withholding key information, Reuters, March 2, 2015

(In other breaking news, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has revealed that the oceans are still wet and that the Sun remains hot. But wait! There’s more: the P5+1 negotiations with Iran will  continue and a deal will be reached because Obama needs a legacy.– DM)

IAEA Director General Amano waits for start of a board of governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in ViennaInternational Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano waits for the start of a board of governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna March 2, 2015. CREDIT: REUTERS/HEINZ-PETER BADER

(Reuters) – The head of the United Nations‘ nuclear watchdog said on Monday Iran had still not handed over key information to his staff, and his body’s investigation into Tehran’s atomic program could not continue indefinitely.

“Iran has yet to provide explanations that enable the agency to clarify two outstanding practical measures,” chief Yukiya Amano told the body’s Board of Governors in Vienna, echoing a report seen by Reuters last month.

The two measures relating to alleged explosives tests and other measures that might have been used for bomb research should have been addressed by Iran by last August.

“The Agency is not in a position to provide credible assurance about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in Iran, and therefore to conclude that all nuclear material in Iran is in peaceful activities,” Amano said.

The West fears Iran wants to develop an atomic bomb. Tehran says its nuclear program is entirely peaceful.

The Agency remains ready to accelerate the resolution of all outstanding issues, he added, but “this process cannot continue indefinitely”.

The United States and five other powers are seeking to negotiate an agreement with Iran to curb its nuclear program in exchange for relief from economic sanctions.

They have set a March deadline for a framework deal and a June deadline for a final one.

The IAEA is likely to monitor any possible deal between Iran and the six powers in addition to its own investigation into Iran’s nuclear program. Amano said he proposed a 1.8-percent increase to the body’s 344-million-euro ($386 million) budget given increased demand for its services.

Amano added that he remained seriously concerned about the nuclear activities of North Korea which quit the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1993. The IAEA has not had inspectors on the ground there since they were expelled by North Korea in 2009.

Bibi’s Truth: Forty years of Liberal Betrayal

March 2, 2015

Bibi’s Truth: Forty years of Liberal Betrayal

By James Lewis

March 2, 2015

via Articles: Bibi’s Truth: Forty years of Liberal Betrayal.

I don’t know what Israel’s Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu is going to say to the U.S. Congress on Tuesday. Obama and the sleaze media will try to make this story all about Bibi and phony “violations of protocol.”

Bibi will try to tell the truth.

Who will you listen to? This is a once-in-a-lifetime event. This time it really matters. Life or death, war or peace, lies or the truth.

This time it’s literally life or death -– not just for one person, but for entire nations and ethnic peoples.

If you doubt that, just see what ISIS is doing to the indigenous Christians who lived in the Middle East centuries before Islam.

Here’s what I hope he will say.

  1. Israel is not the problem in the ME. Nor is any concession Israel could make “the solution,” as liberals seem to think, in their amazingly delusional way. If Israel were to surrender to its genocidal enemies tomorrow, it wouldn’t make a smidgen of difference to all the warring cults and regimes over there. ISIS would still be killing all the same people, because ISIS follows Wahhabi (Saudi) war theology, in which all infidels (you and me), heretics (the mullahs), and polytheists (Hindus and Buddhists) deserve to die by “striking at the neck,” as the Koran says, just like those innocent flight attendants on 9/11/01.
  2. The idea that “Israel is the problem in the Middle East” has obsessed liberal foreign policy professors at least since Arab Oil Embargo of 1973. Today the Muslim Brotherhood runs the “Muslim Student Union” at UC Berkeley and its ilk, in active collusion with radical leftists — like Obama.
  3. Last week Admiral James (“Ace) Lyons (USN, ret.) spoke the blunt truth about Muslim infiltration, subversion, and sabotage of the U.S. government.

“For years, the Muslim Brotherhood has been able to penetrate our national security agencies, and now it is institutionalized. It is the same type of penetration the communists were able to achieve in the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s to influence our policies and operations.

It must be understood that there is no difference between the objectives of the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda. Any distinction lies only in the tactics they use to achieve their objectives: Destroy the United States and replace the Constitution with Shariah law.”

Admiral Lyons was there when Jimmy Carter allowed the ayatollahs to take over Iran, a story that never made any sense, because it assumed that Carter and his NSC head, Zbig Brzezinski, never understood what a fanatical mass killer Khomeini actually was.

Like Adolf Hitler and Lenin, Khomeini wrote about his plans for Iran, before the U.S. allowed him to take over from the Shah. Khomeinist Iran was the first Muslim nation to be run by a sadistic theocratic priesthood, determined to destroy the West (and Israel, of course) to play out its nuclear Armageddon nightmare.

Those are the people that Carter and Zbig brought into power.

Since Iran’s fallback into the early Dark Ages, Islamofascist ideologies have taken over:

  1. Lebanon
  2. Turkey
  3. Syria
  4. Libya
  5. Yemen
  6. Parts of every major European city
  7. Parts of the U.S. government.

Without Obama’s collusion with Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood, Iraq might have been kept free of Islamofascist control. Some parts of Afghanistan that are now reverting to the brutal Taliban might have been saved or kept from being overrun. Hundreds of millions of women are now condemned to Shari’a house arrest and religiously sanctioned beatings. Boko Haram’s Muslim slave raids, massive child abuse, and slave markets should shame our first black American president.

Obama is not the first liberal enabler of Islamic fascism. It started with Carter.

But allowing Iranian nukes is by far the most dangerous act of submission to violent Islam. If this is Obama’s legacy, he will be remembered as the biggest warmonger in history.

Netanyahu entourage official claims the Prime Minister will be providing new information on the Iran deal

March 2, 2015

Netanyahu entourage official claims the Prime Minister will be providing new information on the Iran deal

A senior-level official in Prime Minister Netanyahu’s entourage claims Israel has obtained new information regarding the Iran deal which the Congress members are not aware of.

Mar 02, 2015, 09:33AM | Yael Klein

via Israel News – Netanyahu entourage official claims the Prime Minister will be providing new information on the Iran deal – JerusalemOnline.

Netanyahu speaking before US Congress, archive photo

Netanyahu speaking before US Congress, archive photo Photo Credit: Reuters/Channel 2

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu landed last night (Sun) in Washington, where he will be carrying out his controversial speech, which is due to take place before the American Congress tomorrow. Today, Netanyahu will be speaking before AIPAC.

A senior-level official in Netanyahu’s entourage, who spoke with reporters, has stated that Israel has obtained liable information, which the Congress members are not aware of, according to which the forming Iran deal includes many compromises on behalf of the US which will harm Israel.

The official further stated that Netanyahu’s Congress speech is “the last chance” to block the deal and prove to the Congress that it is a bad deal.

Before leaving for Washington, Netanyahu repeatedly stressed that he felt he was going on a mission, despite those opposing his speech. “I am going on a crucial and historic mission,” he stated before boarding the plane.

Netanyahu, who has been harshly criticized for his decision to speak before the Congress, added: “I feel like an emissary of all of Israel, even those who disagree with me. I feel a deep concern for the fate of Israel and will do everything to ensure our future.”

Former IDF chief hints he stood in way of Iran attack

March 2, 2015

Former IDF chief hints he stood in way of Iran attack

In television interview, Benny Gantz reveals arguments between army and government over strike

By Lazar Berman March 1, 2015, 9:52 pm

via Former IDF chief hints he stood in way of Iran attack | The Times of Israel.

 

Israeli Chief of Staff Benny Gantz (right) listens as US Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin E. Dempsey answers a question during their joint news conference at the Pentagon, January 8, 2015. (photo credit: AP/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Israeli Chief of Staff Benny Gantz (right) listens as US Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin E. Dempsey answers a question during their joint news conference at the Pentagon, January 8, 2015. (photo credit: AP/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

 

Israel’s recently retired chief of staff hinted that he helped prevent a possible Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear program.

Speaking to Ilana Dayan, host of Channel 2’s Uvda newsmagazine, Lt. Gen. (res.) Benny Gantz said he felt that without his presence and input in high-level government discussions, other decisions might have been made.

“It never reached, ‘OK, take off and fly,’” said Gantz in the interview, which is set to air Monday night in Israel. But he added: “I want to believe they listened and took into consideration what I have to say.”

Gantz, who retired in February after 38 years of service, also revealed a dispute between the political leadership, which was moving toward a military strike, and the IDF, opposed to such a move.

Despite the disagreement, the army would implement such a strike if ordered to do so by the political leadership, Gantz affirmed.

Gantz’s period as chief of staff was a tumultuous one, as he found himself shepherding the IDF through the instabilities caused by the Arab uprisings, the rise and fall of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the cyclonic civil war in Syria, and the ever deteriorating security situation along Israel’s northern and southern borders.

But his legacy may be shaped by inaction against Iran’s nuclear program. The decision to strike was not his to make, but his opposition to a strike during this period, together with the reported opposition of several other security chiefs in recent years, may have helped prevent the political decision to carry it out.

Last year Gantz said that a resolution to the standoff over Iran’s nuclear program was “preferable without force, but if there’s no choice then it can [be done] with force.”

He said then that Israel “unequivocally” had the capacity to strike Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, and that “we’ll know how to act when needed.”

Like his predecessor Gabi Ashkenazi, though, Gantz did not believe that the midnight hour had arrived during his four-year term. He apparently disagreed with former defense minister Ehud Barak, who asserted in January that Israel’s capacity to act militarily against Iran’s nuclear program is “declining and in danger of eroding.”

Striking a rogue nuclear program belonging to a state with a powerful military that was openly at odds with the West for decades was difficult but doable, Barak seemed to be arguing; striking the infrastructure of a state that has been welcomed back into the family of nations, that has agreed to the demands of the United States and which is ostensibly in lockstep with the International Atomic Energy Agency is another matter entirely. It is a difference that the military echelons did not fully grasp, Barak has argued.

Gantz’s successor, Lt. Gen. Gadi Eisenkot is of a similar mind regarding Iran: the time for action, Eisenkot reportedly believes, has not yet come.

Mitch Ginsburg contributed to this report.

White House denies Obama threatened to down Israeli jets

March 2, 2015

White House denies Obama threatened to down Israeli jets

National Security Council says Kuwaiti report is as false as leaks coming out of Iranian nuclear talks

By Times of Israel staff March 2, 2015, 6:36 am

via White House denies Obama threatened to down Israeli jets | The Times of Israel.

 

Two Israeli F-15I 'Ra'am' fighter jets during maneuvers (illustrative photo: CC BY-TSgt Kevin J. Gruenwald/USA/Wikimedia)

Two Israeli F-15I ‘Ra’am’ fighter jets during maneuvers (illustrative photo: CC BY-TSgt Kevin J. Gruenwald/USA/Wikimedia)

 

The White House Sunday denied a Kuwaiti report that US President Barack Obama had threatened to shoot down Israeli jets heading toward Iran.

Taking a jab at Jerusalem, the National Security Council indicated the claim was as spurious as reports coming out of the nuclear negotiations with Iran about the content of an emerging deal.

“Like a lot rumors lately about Iran talks, there is no truth to ‘reports’ about Obama & Israeli jets,” read a statement from the NSC’s Twitter account.

A report in Kuwaiti paper al-Jarida Saturday claimed Israel had planned to attack Iranian nuclear sites in 2014 after hearing that Tehran and Washington were nearing a deal that would allow Iran to continue enriching uranium.

According to the report, which cited unnamed “well-placed sources,” an Israeli minister leaked the plan to US Secretary of State John Kerry, after which Obama threatened to shoot down the planes.

There was no Israeli reaction to the report, which came as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to fly to the US to deliver a controversial speech against an Iranian deal before the US Congress.

The visit has ramped up tensions between the prime minister and Obama, who opposed the speech, though Washington and Jerusalem both attempted to smooth over fraying ties Sunday as Netanyahu arrived in Washington.

Kerry on Sunday said he had no problem with Netanyahu’s visit, before taking off for Geneva, where he will meet with his Iranian counterpart to continue high-stakes talks over a nuclear compromise ahead of a March 31 deadline.

Officials have described the United States, Europe, Russia and China as considering a compromise that would see Iran’s nuclear activities severely curtailed for at least a decade, with the restrictions and US and Western economic penalties eased in the final years of a deal.

The White House and State Department both denied the report, which had led Israeli officials, including Netanyahu, to describe the emerging agreement as dangerous for Israel and the West.

Kerry last week indicated critics of the deal like Netanyahu were uninformed about its details.

On Sunday, unnamed Israeli officials traveling with Netanyahu to the US told reporters that Israel was well-informed as to the contents of the agreement.

According to an official cited by Israeli news site Ynet, Netanyahu will use his Tuesday speech to reveal parts of the speech to US lawmakers.

The Associated Press contributed to this report