Posted tagged ‘Jihad’

US says Israel accepted offer to help hunt down teens’ killers

July 2, 2014

US says Israel accepted offer to help hunt down teens’ killers

State Department confirms ‘many indications’ Hamas was involved;
White House urges Jerusalem to not be ‘heavy-handed’

By Rebecca Shimoni Stoil July 2, 2014, 12:54 am

via US says Israel accepted offer to help hunt down teens’ killers | The Times of Israel.

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, right, stands next to Avi Fraenkel, left, and Ofir Shaar (2nd left), fathers of two of the three Israeli teenagers killed in the West Bank, during their funeral on July 1, 2014 in the cemetery of Modiin in central Israel. (photo credit: AFP/POOL/BAZ RATNER)
 

WASHINGTON — A senior White House official revealed Tuesday that Israel had accepted a US offer of assistance in hunting down the killers of three teens, but warned that Israel should “be precise” and avoid an overly “heavy-handed” response to that could further destabilize the situation between Israel and the Palestinians.

The statement by White House Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communication Ben Rhodes came an hour after a State Department spokesperson confirmed the US had received “many indications” that Hamas was “involved” in the kidnapping and killing of three Israeli teenagers whose bodies were discovered Monday.

Rhodes said the US has offered to provide whatever counterterror assistance they can, but did not elaborate on what the aid entailed.

Israeli and US security officials had discussed possibilities for support, but reiterated that Israel “tends to have the clearest understanding of what is taking place when it comes to issues in their neighborhood.”

“In their neighborhood they tend to have the intelligence and law enforcement resources,” he said.

“Our hearts go out to the families of the three teenagers who were found yesterday,” Rhodes told members of Washington’s foreign press corps during a rare question-and-answer session Monday afternoon. “We want to continue to support Israel in finding the perpetrators and bringing them to justice,” he said, adding that “we believe that this is done effectively through working with the Palestinian Authority.”

Rhodes also said that “there has to be an avoidance of steps that can further inflame tensions,” without initially specifying which actors – Israel, Hamas, or the Palestinian Authority’s technocratic government – must do so.

When pressed on Israel’s response to the kidnappings, murders, and continuing rocket attacks launched from the Gaza Strip into southern Israel, Rhodes warned that “Israel needs to be very careful not to be so heavy-handed in their response that they are not threatening the stability of the situation and must respect the dignity of the Palestinian people.”

Rhodes said that “generally, Israel should be precise and they should not cast a net that harms innocent Palestinians in their actions.” In recent days, Israel has faced some international criticism for the rounds of West Bank arrests in which over 400 Palestinians were detained.

At the same time, Rhodes said, “Israel clearly has a deeply held belief that they need to provide for the security of their citizens and when there are three teenagers kidnapped and killed there has to be a response.”

“Terror must be pursued and counterterror measures taken but there must be restraint on both sides,” he said

Although both Rhodes and State Department Deputy Spokeswoman Marie Harf commended Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s stated willingness to work with Israel in the wake of the kidnappings, Harf acknowledged that Abbas did not include Secretary of State John Kerry in a round of calls to world leaders that he reportedly made after the teens’ bodies were discovered outside of Hebron.

Harf, like Rhodes, said that the US was “encouraging restraint from both sides, from the parties, to avoid steps that now could destabilize the situation,” but also noted that the US had offered “full support” both to Israel and to the PA “to find the perpetrator to this crime and bring them to justice.”

Harf declined to comment or criticize the IAF airstrikes carried out overnight against terrorist targets in the Gaza Strip.

She did, however, tread a fine line regarding Hamas’s responsibility for the kidnapping and murders. Although administration officials have been wary of asserting a connection between Hamas and the terror attack, Harf argued Tuesday that “there are many indications pointing to Hamas’s involvement, and it is also important to note that Hamas’s leadership has publicly praised the kidnappings.”

The US, she said, was still waiting to receive more details on the investigation into the youths’ kidnapping and murder.

Israeli security officials have identified two suspects – Marwan Kawasme, 29, and Amar Abu Aysha, 32, both Hamas activists from Hebron — as responsible for the abductions.

“The investigation is still ongoing, and we want to get to the bottom of what happened here,” Harf emphasized, adding that the State Department takes the investigation “very seriously, not just for the fact that these are three teenagers that’ve been killed but also given that one’s an American,” referring to Fraenkel.

Harf then, however, conditioned her remarks by saying that “there are many indications as part of this investigation that Hamas may have been involved. I am not at this point saying they were responsible. I am not putting a specific name out there. I’m saying the investigation’s ongoing.”

White House Spokesperson Josh Earnest also talked up cooperation on Tuesday, noting that ”there was some security cooperation between the Palestinian Authority and Israel as they investigated the disappearance of these young men, as they tried to bring them home safely.”

Earnest highlighted what he described as “an important security relationship between Israel and the Palestinian Authority,” adding that “we hope that that spirit of cooperation, even in the midst of this very difficult time, will continue.”

SHAPIRO: Candlelight Vigils Are Not Enough — It’s Time to Act

July 2, 2014

SHAPIRO: Candlelight Vigils Are Not Enough — It’s Time to ActFight, or get ready for the next slaughter of innocents.

via SHAPIRO: Candlelight Vigils Are Not Enough — It’s Time to Act | Truth Revolt.

 

 

he pro-Israel community is often united by tragedy. When five members of the Fogel family, including a three-month-old child, were slaughtered by Palestinian terrorists in 2011, the Jewish community mourned. Candlelight vigils dotted the landscape. 20,000 people turned out for the funerals.

And nothing happened.

Because three years later, the White House continues to fund the Palestinian Authority unity government, which includes Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Three years later, Israel is castigated by the left-wing, Palestinian-supporting media for taking action against terror groups. And three years later, the world community continues to isolate Israel and pressure her to concede to her terrorist enemies.

Now three more Jewish kids are dead, including an American citizen.

And we hear the calls for more candlelight vigils, more shows of unity. We see thousands of Jews and allies gathering internationally to memorialize these three slain teens. We see community leaders expressing sympathy.

And nothing will happen.

Unless we make it happen. The United States must end its support for the Palestinian Authority. It must stop making excuses for the Palestinians’ desire to slaughter Jews wholesale and wipe Israel from the map. It must cease incentivizing the death of Jews, both American and Israeli.

Please tweet with #StopFundingTerror. Please contact the White House and tell them that their support for the Palestinian Authority is unacceptable. Do anything and everything possible to end American taxpayer dollars funding the Palestinian government.

Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, one of the most renowned sages in the Jewish community and the dean of the high school these boys attended, was told about their murders yesterday. ” “People will light memorial candles, recite prayers, and attend vigils,” he stated, according to the Algemeiner. “Our boys were killed al Kiddush Hashem, because they were Jews.

“Therefore, to best honor their memories – indeed, to confront evil – we must act always as proud Jews, in our deeds and through our lives.”

Now is the time for tears. But it is also the time to act. As proud Jews. As proud Americans. As proud members of Western civilization. If we do not, those who murdered these three boys will keep cashing their checks, preparing for the next opportunity to slaughter innocents.

Netanyahu: ‘We Will Avenge Their Blood’

July 1, 2014

Netanyahu has just added Gaza to the list of venues in which the scourge of Hamas is to be significantly weakened or removed.

By: Hana Levi Julian
Published: July 1st, 2014

via The Jewish Press » » Netanyahu: ‘We Will Avenge Their Blood’.

 

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu
Photo Credit: Marc Israel Sellem/POOL/Flash 90
 

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu vowed at a briefing prior to a security cabinet meeting Tuesday night that Israel will “avenge the blood” of the three teens murdered by Arab terrorists on June 12.

The security cabinet is meeting to formulate its response to the escalation in terror, from Gaza as well as the attack that took the lives of the three teens in Gush Etzion.

Despite prompt and fierce retaliation to each rocket attack by the Israel Air Force, Gaza terrorists appear to be undeterred, launching increased rocket and mortar attacks aimed at southern Israel daily.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu delivered a brief statement in Tel Aviv prior to the start of the meeting.

“We will avenge their blood, the blood of the [three teens murdered by Hamas terrorists on June 12,” he said.

“Our first objective is … to reach the murderers – which we will do — and anyone who participated in this. Anyone who had a hand in this despicable murder, their blood is on his head,” Netanyahu said grimly.

“We will track down each and every one.

“Second, we will destroy the infrastructure and the strength of Hamas in Judea and Samaria, in every corner of the region,” he vowed. “We have already done a great deal. We will continue until it is destroyed.

“Third, [our goal is] to destroy the strength of Hamas in Gaza.

“Hamas is responsible for the terror that took the lives of our three boys, and for the rocket fire directed against Israeli families. Hamas is now paying the price, and Hamas will continue to pay.

“Above all, our priority is to secure the safety of Israel’s citizens,” the prime minister said.

IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz joined Netanyahu at the briefing, adding a statement of his own and telling reporters that soldiers and officers were grieving together with the rest of Israel over the murders of the teens.

“Every officer, every soldier did every thing possible to successfully complete this search – to our sorrow, it ended in this way.

“We will continue [Operation Brother’s Keeper] against Hamas and against our enemies with the same motivation and the same energy.

“We will not allow the communities of the south to continue to be threatened with attacks as they are today,” Gantz promised.

The Time for Meaningful Action Has Come

July 1, 2014

The Time for Meaningful Action Has ComeThere is only one sensible response to the abduction and murder of Israeli citizens.

via PJ Media » The Time for Meaningful Action Has Come.

July 1, 2014 – 12:00 am

The response to the murder of the three abducted Israeli teens, Eyal Yifrah, Gilad Shaar, and Naftali Fraenkel, has been predictable in its call for restraint and moderation. Left-wing organizations like the Israeli political party Meretz, the New Israel Fund, and J Street, wedded to nebulous and self-serving concepts like “social justice,” ramble on about calm, measure, reconciliation, and the larger interests of communal peace — as if avowedly vicious and homicidal entities like Hamas and its offshoots will feel humbled and ashamed of their murderous practices and will experience a benign change of heart.

In fact, they are busy celebrating what they regard as a revanchist victory — indeed, candies were handed out to mark the abduction and the ambulance ferrying the bodies of the slain teens was pelted with stones and spray-painted by Palestinian villagers — and will not be deterred from carrying out further atrocities in the future if they are allowed to get away with them. Perhaps the principals of our conciliatory organizations would feel differently if their own children had been kidnapped, tortured, and killed. But one thing is certain: for all their “prayers for the suffering families” and “calls for peace,” they are incapable of imagining what their own people endure and are barren of genuine feeling, while full of empathy and concern for their assailants, who wish only for their speedy death and the subsequent extinction of the Jewish state. There is only one word for such flaccid, self-righteous and ultimately self-immolating appeasers: idiots.

As for the Israeli leadership, it’s a mixed bag. Outgoing president Shimon Peres is a grande fromage who over the years has grown gamy and rancid, with a soft European rind. Benjamin Netanyahu should be cut a little slack given the intense pressures, domestic and international, that he labors under — but he is not his father, who was cut in the mold of the pragmatic and unyielding patriot Ze’ev Jabotinsky. (See Benzion Netanyahu, The Founding Fathers of Zionism.)

With only a few exceptions, like Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon, Foreign Affairs Minister Avigdor Lieberman, and Deputy Defense Minister Danny Danon, the Israeli leadership comprises a motley crew best left to their often lucrative but generally undistinguished careers, prone to log-rolling and corruption, devoid of segulah (Hebrew for virtue or inner treasure), more preoccupied with their American holdings and European vacations than with the security of their beleaguered nation.

The theory, of course, that presumably governs their behavior is that diplomacy and treating with perennial enemies or political adversaries — e.g. acceding to American bullying, glad-handing Turkey, subsidizing the PA, victualing Gaza, engaging in outrageously disproportionate prisoner swaps, giving a hostile and often traitorous Israeli media and academy a free pass, etc. — is a way of ensuring the ultimate security of the country. On the contrary, Israeli citizens are rendered increasingly unsafe by the prosecution of such measures.

When it comes to Israel’s Muslim belligerents, anyone with more than an ounce of common sense knows that working with murderers and ideological maniacs is counter-productive. As Caroline Glick has pointed out, exchanging one kidnapped soldier for over a thousand Muslim terrorists is the height of folly. “In every instance, these terrorist releases have led to the murder and abduction of other Israelis.” The result is that Israeli policies “have placed targets [on] the backs of every citizen of Israel.” How, then, should Israel have responded to Hamas, the abductors of Gilad Shalit? The terrorist organization should have been given three days to return its captive, or risk its total destruction, which Israel has the power to accomplish. There is, really, no other effective way of dealing with a musteline pack of jihadist predators and barbarians than to credibly threaten it with extinction. Gilad Shalit would have been back home in record time, and the three Israeli teens would not have been abducted and killed. The thousands of Israeli citizens murdered and maimed in the various intifadas would still be alive and hale.

The time for temporizing, fruitless negotiations, so-called realist politics, and tolerance of an active and toxic fifth column that diligently and indefatigably strives to undermine the safety of Israeli citizens and the security of the state, is demonstrably over.

The heinous events that have just occurred should be change accelerators in Israeli thinking to redeem the political and moral parvitude too many of its leaders have exhibited for so many years. If the IDF doesn’t smash utterly the terrorist infestations that have wrought so much harm on the country and will continue to do so, then there is no forgiving, international opinion and diplomatic pressures notwithstanding. At the same time, every left-wing media outlet and treasonous university department in the country should be rigorously monitored and in some cases, if necessary, shut down. Much of the Shomron must be annexed. Now may be the time for the imposition of martial law in order to evade the insidious complicities of the Supreme Court. Without these determined initiatives, such events as we have just witnessed will inevitably keep happening — rocket attacks, abductions, killings, the disruption of ordinary life, the whole ball of filthy wax. For such a sensible if aggressive policy of vigorous, comprehensive, and meaningful retaliation, rather than tit-for-tat reprisals, is nothing less than a kind of mitzvah with social, ethical, and national implications.

ISIS-terror rooted in Islamic culture

June 30, 2014

ISIS-terreur geworteld in islamitische cultuur

Leon de Winter op 30 juni, 2014 – 10:14

via ISIS-terreur geworteld in islamitische cultuur | www.dagelijksestandaard.nl.

 

Bing translation from Dutch
Why fight thousands of young European Muslim men for the Foundation of a Caliphate, or a religious tyranny? For the ideologues that the problems of those young men want to see in socio-economic terms, is that a great puzzle.
In their progressive worldview are the problems of migrants and their children provided by the social context within which these groups must survive. But time and time again goes to show that the culture either: to the agricultural and religious traditions that those migrants have taken away from the country of departure.
Why not all children of migrants from Islamic countries take part in the progress of Netherlands? Why hooks so many Moroccan and Turkish young men off and they end up in crime? What goes wrong with these children at a young age making them, like their parents, not the move on from the poverty and ignorance of life from before the migration to the new life in Europe with knowledge, understanding, prosperity?
Enmity
In many immigrant families, children with distaste and hatred towards their new environment brought up. They get from their parents and by the Arab media to hear that they are entitled to much more than what they possess. That children grow up with frustration and enmity.
On the internet is swarming with young Moroccan Dutch people who applaud ISIS, the terror movement to gruesome mass murders makes guilty. Young Moroccans who identify themselves with the fury of the ISISfighters.
They too are furious – why? They get too little training, too little cell phones? Or the following plays: their status as Muslim, says their culture, is elevated above that of non-Muslim Dutchman, and yet their subordinate social position and relatively frugal?
On the micro level we see here what happens on a macro level between Arab countries and Israel. The small country is in every way better developed than any Arabic country. More prosperity, more freedom, more science. And that is unacceptable for Arabs. According to their tradition is the Jew an inferior human being who has rejected the message of Mohammed the perfect man and therefore subject to the Muslim.
And precisely this despicable people has managed to each Arab country. The successful existence of Israel makes the message of islam that is the final message of Allah ridiculous. And because this message can be not ridiculous, says Israel must be destroyed, the believer, at all costs. It Was Golda Meir who once said: the Arabs hate us more than they love their own children?
Mechanisms
I have the impression that migrants have taken this kind of mental mechanisms to Netherlands. Fortunately, there are many who let not stifle personal opportunities by rigid beliefs, but when believers encounter the alleged superiority of the faith and the archaic gender roles and parenting methods constantly on the wicked and yet rich and powerful environment.
So these believers continually demands more space on for their god. Their minarets are visible and their wives should be apparent. And for their sons around the non-believer is part of the Dar al-Harb, the world of war, where they sanctioned by their culture to your heart’s content because Rob and steal, as may those gay assassins of ISIS.
The problems of their religious culture, which the Arab (and other Muslim) peoples in backwardness and ignorance keep hostage, are no longer limited to the areas where islam traditionally the predominant culture is. Migration has brought to Europe these problems. And it is worrying that migrants the crippling forces of the culture of the country of origin is not neutralize with the unprecedented opportunities that exist in Europe.
France, land of liberty, equality, fraternity, has immense problems with Islamic criminal and radicalized young men. It’s not about access to food, education, clothing, no, it comes to intangibles that define self-esteem of many angry young Muslims. They want a form of respect, and a related pattern of consumption, that society their not slavishly on the basis of their superior origin offers.
Their embittered aggrieved parents, their spiritual leaders, their hate spewing sends the same message: television channels, all the power in the world are not and its not like our holy book promises us, and so we must fights such as the infidels and Mohammed fought with the sword topics.
May it be said: the germ to radicalisation is in the general cultural values of these migrants? The Koran is built on three contrasts; male-female, believerinfidel, master-slave. In the West, these three getechnologiseerde and individualized contrasts as good as raised.
Infallible
The West is, just like Israel, a negation of what islam follower promises: reign of the true believer on Earth and eternal life in heaven. The negation is not other than temporary, thus the believer, because islam is infallible.
The young men who are now in the Middle East are experiencing the adventures of their lives and robbing and raping and beheading, legitimised may one day come back. They are not radicalized because they were pathetic or too little, no, they are radicalized opportunities because their cultural traditions have made impossible integration and offer young men the concept of the Holy struggle, an idea that many young men to fine brings excitement.
Israel and Jordan are in the same period. They have about the same population. No raw materials. They belong to the same historical world. Why one country came to fruition and it became an open democracy, and why was the other hardly a dictatorship that contributes to the progress of humanity?
Possessed
A famous rabbi was once asked to the Torah in one phrase to sum up. He replied: what you don’t want others do you shall rest; This is the whole Torah now go home and study. This is the reason why Israel prospers, and not Jordan. This is the reason why the West knows prosperity and freedom, and the Arab world. It is tragic and dangerous that the ideology of ISIS, and of the possessed young men of colluding, that exactly the opposite values. It’s the culture, stupid.

‘New reality requires security fence on Jordan border’

June 30, 2014

New reality requires security fence on Jordan border'”

The Sykes-Picot Agreement that shaped the borders around us almost 100 years ago has run its course,” PM Benjamin Netanyahu says •

Netanyahu says Israel needs to support international efforts to strengthen Jordan and support Kurdish independence

Shlomo Cesana, Eli Leon and Israel Hayom Staff

via Israel Hayom | ‘New reality requires security fence on Jordan border’.

 

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Institute for National Security Studies conference in Tel Aviv, Sunday|
Photo credit: Yehoshua Yosef
 

In light of recent changes in the Middle East, Israel is going to have to construct a security fence along the length of its border with Jordan, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday.

Speaking at the Institute for National Security Studies conference in Tel Aviv, Netanyahu said that in any future peace deal with the Palestinians, the Israel Defense Forces would be the entity protecting Israel in Judea and Samaria, including the Jordan Valley.

Israel “must stabilize the region west of the security line in Jordan,” Netanyahu said, adding that the territory of a future Palestinian state, up to the Jordan River, would have to remain under full Israeli security control for many years.

Netanyahu said he was updating his 2009 Bar-Ilan University address, in which he called for a two-state solution. The prime minister said he now advocates the notion that the Palestinians should have “political and economic control in the territories they control, but simultaneously there must be a continuation of Israeli security operations in these territories to ensure the disarmament of terrorist groups.”

“A withdrawal of our forces would likely bring about the fall of the Palestinian Authority, and the rise of Islamist extremists, like in the Gaza Strip, which would pose a serious danger for Israel,” Netanyahu said.

He cited four challenges ahead for Israel: defending its borders, stabilizing the region between the security border with Jordan and the population centers, regional cooperation to stop the spread of Islamist extremism, and preventing Iran from becoming a nuclear threshold state.

“The Middle East is witnessing a historic change, one with serious implications for Israel’s and the world’s safety. The Sykes-Picot Agreement that shaped the borders around us almost 100 years ago has run its course,” Netanyahu said.

With regards to developments in Jordan, and the looming threat of jihadist fighters from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, Netanyahu said Israel needs to “support international efforts to strengthen Jordan and support the Kurdish aspiration for independence.”

“Jordan is a stable country, moderate, has a powerful military and knows how to protect itself, which is in fact why international efforts to support it are worthy,” Netanyahu said.

“Regarding the Kurds, they are a fighting people that have proved their political commitment, political moderation, and deserve political independence,” Netanyahu continued.

Meanwhile, the deputy chairman of Turkey’s ruling party indicated last week that Turkey was willing to accept a Kurdish state in Iraq.

“The Kurds in Iraq can decide for themselves the name and type of state that they want to live in,” Justice and Development Party (AKP) Deputy Chairman Huseyin Celik said.

The statements mark a change of rhetoric for Turkey, which had until now opposed Kurdish independence in Iraq, in fear it would bolster nationalistic aspirations of the Turkish Kurds who make up more than 15 percent of its population

The Islamist Plague

June 30, 2014

The Islamist Plague

By Rachel Ehrenfeld
Monday, June 30th, 2014 @ 3:56AM

via The Islamist Plague.

 

 

Many Western commentators have adopted the narrative that al Qaeda and its ilk are the exception to the “religion of peace” — Islam.

However, the rise of “political Islam,” the brainchild of the Muslim Brotherhood, is more akin to a highly infectious disease. No vaccine is available; its spread can only be halted by identifying and eliminating the sources of infection. Yet, despite the mortal danger posed by the increasingly violent global jihadist movement, willful blindness persists in the United States and the West.

Once the Soviet Union imploded and Islamist fundamentalism exploded, Muhammad replaced Marx and Lenin, and radical Islam replaced the socialist-nationalist doctrines of the Arab revolutionaries. The collapse of the Soviet Union served as the catalyst for an alliance between radical Sunni and Shiite movements that helped to revive Islamist fundamentalism. The spread of the Islamist ideology was paid for by the oil-rich Arab/Muslim states, which also used their money to buy Western “opinion makers,” including businessmen, politicians, the media, and academics.

New communication technologies allowed the increasingly vitriolic Islamist rhetoric to spread instantaneously. Instead of taking measures to stop the instructive incitement for murder, the West sank further into appeasement, thus encouraging the spread of the jihadist agenda.

While the bloody attacks of ISIS and Hezbollah in Iraq and Syria are portrayed as a Sunni vs. Shiite struggle, the role of Ayatollah Khomeini, as the leader of the “Islamic Revolution,” should not be forgotten.

After successfully taking over Iran, the Ayatollah Khomeini began calling for the unification of Muslims throughout the world, and for exporting his Muslim Revolution to wherever Muslims live so that Muslim domination could be achieved. “We are at war against Infidels,” the Ayatollah told a large group of Pakistani military officers on a pilgrimage to Qom in January 1980. “Take this message with you … I ask all Muslims [emphasis added] … to join the Holy War. There are many enemies to be killed or destroyed. Jihad must triumph.” He stressed that the “Iranian Experiment” should be followed, and that the realization of the true Islamic State should be carried out forcibly and without compromise.

These plans for Islamic unification were accelerated by the Gulf War. The war helped the leaders of Islamist groups throughout the globe to enforce their vision that jihad, holy war, is the only formula for protecting Islam from extinction by the West — led by the U.S. This opinion was and is repeatedly voiced by every Islamist leader. “Bush and Thatcher have revived in the Muslims the spirit of Jihad and martyrdom,” wrote the Palestinian leader of the Islamic Jihad, Sheikh As’ad Bayyud al-Tamimi. He promised that all Muslims “will fight a comprehensive war and ruthlessly transfer the battle to the heart of America and Europe.” Despite the advancement of the ISIS, many in the West continue to dismiss such statements as pure rhetoric. Instead, they are hanging on to statements, made by Muslim and Arab leaders and politicians, that ISIS and the other jihadists are aberrations that should be eliminated.

Yet, the U.S. and other Western countries are trying, again, to negotiate, i.e., submit to demands of their mortal enemies, supposedly to avoid further escalation, often accepting statements the like of which were made by Egyptian Sunni theologian Mahmud Shaltut (1893-1963), in his al-Qur’an wal-Qitāl:

“Muhammad revealed a book [the Quran] containing the principles of happiness. It commands to judge by reason, it propagate science and knowledge, it gives clear rules, it proclaims mercy, it urges to do good, it preaches peace, it gives firm principles concerning politics and society, it fights injustice and corruption.”

He also declared, “The Islamic community is commanded to do only what is good and are forbidden to do what is reprehensible and evil. The Islamic mission is clear and evident, easy and uncomplicated. It is digestible and intelligible for any mind. It is a call of natural reason, and therefore not alien to human intellect. This is the mission of Muhammad to humanity.”

While Shaltut’s argument that “it is the interest of humanity to gather enthusiastically under Islamic rule,” has not been accepted, yet, the U.S. efforts to ignore the Islamic plague and its sources, only help to spread it.

ISIL jihadist group claims Islamic world leadership

June 30, 2014

ISIL jihadist group claims Islamic world leadership

Spoesman says Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is ‘leader for Muslims everywhere’; announces establishment of caliphate

By AFP June 29, 2014, 11:24 pm

via ISIL jihadist group claims Islamic world leadership | The Times of Israel.

 

An image uploaded on June 14, 2014 on the jihadist website Welayat Salahuddin allegedly shows militants of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) driving on a street at unknown location in the Salaheddin province. (photo credit: AFP PHOTO / HO / WELAYAT SALAHUDDIN)
 

The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant jihadist group, which spearheaded a sweeping militant assault that
overran swathes of Iraq, is now claiming leadership of the world’s Muslims.

Known for its ruthless tactics and suicide bombers, ISIL has carried out frequent bombings and shootings in Iraq, and is also arguably the most capable force fighting President Bashar Assad inside Syria.

But it truly gained international attention this month, when its fighters and those from other militant groups swept through the northern city of Mosul, then overran major areas of five provinces north and west of Baghdad.

ISIL is led by the shadowy Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and backed by thousands of Islamist fighters in Syria and Iraq, some of them Westerners, and it appears to be surpassing al-Qaeda as the world’s most dangerous jihadist group.

In a sign of the group’s confidence, it has now expanded its claim of leadership to encompass all the world’s Muslims.

In an audio recording distributed online Friday, ISIL’s spokesman Abu Mohammad al-Adnani declared Baghdadi “the caliph” and “leader for Muslims everywhere.”

“The Shura (council) of the Islamic State met and discussed this issue (of the caliphate)… The Islamic State decided to establish an Islamic caliphate and to designate a caliph for the state of the Muslims,” Adnani said.

He was referring to a system of rule last used to govern a state almost 100 years ago, before the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.

Western governments fear ISIL could eventually emulate al-Qaeda and strike overseas, but their biggest worry for now is its sweeping gains in Iraq and the likely eventual return home of foreign fighters attracted by ISIL and Baghdadi.

Among them are men like Mehdi Nemmouche, a 29-year-old Frenchman who allegedly carried out a deadly shooting on a Jewish museum in Belgium after spending a year fighting with ISIL in Syria.
12,000 foreign fighters

The Soufan Group, a New York-based consultancy, estimates that 12,000 foreign fighters have traveled to Syria, including 3,000 from the West.

And ISIL appears to have the greatest appeal, with King’s College London professor Peter Neumann estimating around 80 percent of Western fighters in Syria have joined the group.

Unlike other groups fighting Assad, ISIL is seen working toward an ideal Islamic emirate. And compared with al-Qaeda’s franchise in Syria, Al-Nusra Front, it has lower entry barriers.

ISIL has also sought to appeal to non-Arabs, publishing English-language magazines, after having already released videos in English, or with English subtitles.

The jihadist group claims to have had fighters from the Britain, France, Germany and other European countries, as well as the United States, and from the Arab world and the Caucasus.

Much of the appeal also stems from Baghdadi himself — the ISIL leader is touted as a battlefield commander and tactician, a crucial distinction compared with Al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri.

“Baghdadi has done an amazing amount — he has captured cities, he has mobilized huge amounts of people, he is killing ruthlessly throughout Iraq and Syria,” said Richard Barrett, a former counter-terrorism chief at MI6, Britain’s foreign intelligence service.

“If you were a guy who wanted action, you would go with Baghdadi,” Barrett told AFP.

At the time Baghdadi took over what was then known as the Islamic State of Iraq, or ISI, in May 2010, his group appeared to be on the ropes, after the “surge” of US forces combined with the shifting allegiances of Sunni tribesmen to deal him a blow.

But the group has bounced back, expanding into Syria in 2013.

Baghdadi sought to merge with Al-Nusra, which rejected the deal, and the two groups have operated separately since.

The U.S., the U.K. and Canada in Jihad Denial

June 29, 2014

The U.S., the U.K. and Canada in Jihad Denial

June 27, 2014 by Robert Spencer

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book, Arab Winter Comes to America: The Truth About the War We’re In, is now available.

via The U.S., the U.K. and Canada in Jihad Denial | FrontPage Magazine.

 

 

The denial of the reality of jihad is thicker than ever, even as jihadis advance around the world. And it endangers us all.

Former CIA officer John Maguire revealed this week that the CIA was blindsided by the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), which now controls so much of Syria and Iraq and has designs on a great deal more territory. Maguire attributed the CIA’s underestimating of ISIL’s threat to The Company’s reduced presence in Iraq: “This is a glaring example of the erosion of our street craft and our tradecraft and our capability to operate in a hard place. The U.S. taxpayer is not getting their money’s worth.”

But that isn’t the whole story. Another reason why the CIA was completely surprised by ISIL’s advance was because the Obama Administration has so thoroughly deemphasized the jihad threat, and loudly and repeatedly proclaimed that al Qaeda was the only jihad group – and was, for its part, “on the ropes.” ISIL, an offshoot of al Qaeda in a country where Obama was in a hurry to declare victory and get out was unlikely to be the focus of sustained or serious analysis.

The willful ignorance is all-pervasive. It is a fundamental dogma of our age that the overwhelming majority of Muslims in Western countries are enthusiastic democratic pluralists who reject and abhor not only jihad terrorism, but the elements of Sharia that are at variance with otherwise universally held principles of human rights. This dogma keeps running up against the buzz-saw of reality, but that never seems to make a difference to authorities.

And so it was this week that the UK’s Daily Mail noted that the Metropolitan Police’s Assistant Commissioner, Cressida Dick, said of Britain’s Muslim communities that “there were many cases where ‘warning signs’ about extremists were not brought to the attention of authorities. She also indicated some Muslims were too accepting of radical views, saying it was the police’s ‘greatest challenge’ to make them ‘wholly hostile to violent extremism.’”

How could this be? After all, a core assumption of British intelligence and law enforcement officials is that Muslim communities on the Sceptered Isle unambiguously oppose “violent extremism,” except, of course, for that pesky and ever-present tiny minority of extremists. So why were Muslims sometimes not bringing potential jihadis to the attention of authorities? Of course the obvious reason for this, and for why some Muslims in Britain are “too accepting of radical views,” is because they agree with those “radical views” and consider them to be authentic Islam. But that prospect is so horrifying in its implications that British officials do not dare face it.

Indeed, it is virtually universally accepted that Islam is inherently peaceful, and that only the extremists who misunderstand it (and vicious Islamophobes) think otherwise. So it was that at the University of Calgary, university officials ignored a professor’s warnings about potential jihadists on campus – after all, such a suggestion is “Islamophobic,” is it not?

A Muslim from Calgary, Farah Mohamed Shirdon, is in Iraq waging jihad with ISIL, and a former University of Calgary professor, Aaron Hughes, is saying that he tried to warn university officials that something like this was in the offing.

Hughes said: “I was very much bothered by the conservative nature of the Muslim student body. I was definitely aware of the potential for radicalization on campus. That is another venue in which potential radicalization could occur, so not just at mosques, but also on campus.” However, “I had been mentioning the conservative nature of these students and the university; they just weren’t interested in it.”

These “conservative” students annoyed Hughes by refusing to accept his understanding of Islam: “They made teaching Islam from an objective perspective very difficult because they knew what the ‘real’ Islam was. Of course they didn’t.” Or maybe they did, but Hughes, assured of the fact that Islam was a Religion of Peace, was certain that they were actually ignorant of their own religion, no matter how dedicated to it they were.

University officials, in any case, disregarded Hughes’s warnings. Jihadis on campus? Inconceivable! Islam is a Religion of Peace!

Even terrorism may be peaceful nowadays. Mohamed Hassan Hersi, a Muslim in Toronto who has been convicted of trying to join the jihad terror group al Shabaab, was only engaged, according to his lawyer, in “non-violent terrorism.”

“Non-violent terrorism”? The phrase is as stupid and devoid of content as another popular term these days, “moderate Islamist.”

The world is in flames because of Islamic jihad. Will those flames finally burn away the all-blanketing fog of disinformation, misinformation, and willful ignorance concerning the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat? Perhaps. But there is no telling how much else will be burned away along with it.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.