Posted tagged ‘Islam’

Hamas says group preparing for ‘long battle,’ as three-day truce nears end

August 12, 2014

Hamas says group preparing for ‘long battle,’ as three-day truce nears end

By HERB KEINON, KHALED ABU TOAMEH 08/12/2014 22:30

As Netanyahu briefs coalition on cease-fire efforts, Palestinian sources say Israel has accepted few demands, and no progress has been made on key issues.

via Hamas says group preparing for ‘long battle,’ as three-day truce nears end | JPost | Israel News.

 

Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat (L) talks with Arab League Chief Nabil el-Araby during their meeting at the Arab League in Cairo August 11, 2014. Photo: REUTERS
 

The 72-hour cease-fire that went into effect in Gaza on Sunday is to expire at midnight Wednesday, with Israeli officials unable or unwilling to predict whether it will be extended or the fighting will start anew.

Finance Minister Yair Lapid, a member of the eight-person security cabinet, said the gaps between Israel and Hamas holding indirect talks in Cairo were “wide.”

“It is possible that the fighting will begin again at midnight,” he said in a Channel 2 interview. “But it will not be the same fighting, because we will hit them much harder.”

Lapid said that Israel was dealing “with a murderous terrorist organization that wants to kill Jews,” and it will be “impossible to move forward” unless the security of the communities in the south is secured.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu cancelled a security-cabinet that was scheduled for Tuesday after it became apparent that there had been no progress in the Cairo talks on Monday, and there was no need for any decisions to be taken. Rather than hold the security cabinet meeting, Netanyahu briefed the heads of his coalition partners in the afternoon.

One diplomatic official said that Israel hoped that the cease-fire would be extended, but that Hamas was the “wild card” and it was not clear how they would react.

Diplomatic officials said that all the options were on the table, and that three scenarios were being taken into consideration: that a longer-term cease fire is agreed upon by midnight; that another 72-hour cease-fire is declared during which negotiations continue on a longer deal; that the cease-fire ends and Hamas again begins rocketing Israeli towns.

The Palestinians, meanwhile, said that almost no progress has been achieved during the Egyptian-sponsored talks.

Unconfirmed reports suggested that Hamas and Islamic Jihad members of the Palestinian negotiating team were considering pulling out from the talks in protest against Israel’s refusal to accept their demands.

They accused Israel of “procrastination” and warned that Hamas and other Palestinian factions would not agree to an extension of the cease-fire.

“Israel is continuing with its policy of foot-dragging and is not taking our demands seriously,” a Palestinian official in Cairo told the Palestinian daily Al-Quds.

“Israel is trying to impose its conditions and this will never happen regardless of the cost. If Israel requests another extension of the cease-fire, our delegation won’t agree.”

The Cairo talks are being under the auspices of Egypt’s General Intelligence Service, with the Israeli team shuttling back and forth between Cairo and Jerusalem. .

Qais Abu Laila, member of the Palestinian team to the cease-fire talks, said that the gap between the two sides remained “very wide.”

Abu Laila said that he and his colleagues have informed the Egyptians that this would be the last cease-fire with Israel.

Yehya Musa, a senior Hamas official in the Gaza Strip, said that his movement was preparing for a “long battle” with Israel.

Musa, who was speaking during a pro-Hamas rally in Khan Yunis, said that the Palestinians “won’t accept humiliation.”

Addressing the Palestinian team in Cairo, Musa said: “We are all behind you until you achieve our just demands. We know that everyone is conspiring against you, but we are confident that you won’t make concessions. Be patient because we have nothing more to lose.”

Palestinian sources told the Palestinian Ma’an news agency that Israel was insisting on discussing the fate of two missing IDF soldiers who were killed during Operation protective Edge, while the Palestinians asked to delay this issue.

According to the sources, Israel has thus far accepted only a few of the Palestinian demands, including increasing the number of trucks loaded with food and goods that enter through Kerem Shalom and Nahal Oz and allowing 5000 Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to enter Israel every month.

Israel has also agreed to drop its opposition to the transfer of funds to pay salaries of Hamas civil servants in the Gaza Strip and expanding the fishing zone gradually, the sources said.

In addition, the sources added, the Israelis and Palestinians have agreed on the reopening of the Rafah border crossing and the deployment of 1000 Palestinian Authority police officers at the terminal, as well as the release of the fourth patch of Palestinian prisoners, who were supposed to be freed earlier this year in accordance with a US-sponsored agreement between the PA and Israel.

However, the two sides have still failed to make progress on several other issues, such the disarming of Palestinian groups in the Gaza Strip, the airport and seaport and a safe passage between the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the sources added.

Israeli officials refused to relate to these reports, with one official saying that Israel did not feel the need to respond to Palestinian “disinformation.”

In New York, meanwhile, US Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said at a news conference that he hoped a “durable cease-fire “ would be reached soon.

Ban said that 2,000 Palestinians have been killed, including more children than were killed in the two previous Gaza crisis combined; 300,000 people were being sheltered in UNRWA facilities; and 100,000 people have had their homes destroyed or damaged.

“Israel’s duty to protect its citizens from rocket attacks by Hamas and other threats is beyond question,” Ban said. “At the same time, the fighting has raised serious questions about Israel’s respect for the principles of distinction and proportionality. Reports of militant activity does not justify jeopardizing the lives and safety of many thousands of innocent civilians.”

Ban did not mention that on at least three occasions Hamas rockets were stored in UNRWA schools, and that when when discovered they were turned over to Hamas, nor did he mention evidence showing that rockets were launched perilously close to UN facilities.

While directly condemning Israel, Ban only obliquely criticized Hamas, saying at one time during the press conference, though without mentioning the organization by name: “They simply have not listened to those voices of reason and they have not cared [for] their own people. In the name of protecting their own people, they have been letting their people be killed by others.”

Saudi Arabia: “Without Negotiations, Israel Will Be Annihilated”

August 12, 2014

Saudi Arabia: “Without Negotiations, Israel Will Be Annihilated”

Israel must realize that a peace treaty is its only chance for survival,” the Saudi foreign minister said in an unusual statement today while negotiations to consolidate a platform for a cease-fire continue in Cairo.

He also leveled grave criticism at the operation in Gaza and claimed that Israel was committing terrorism and disregarding international law.

Aug 12, 2014, 07:00PM | James McIntosh

via Israel News – Saudi Arabia: “Without Negotiations, Israel Will Be Annihilated” – JerusalemOnline.

 

Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal Reuters

Against the backdrop of the relative silence that Saudi Arabia displayed during Operation Protective Edge, the regional power sent a message to Israel that it had to reach a peace agreement with the Palestinians if it wished to survive as a nation.

In remarks that he made at a meeting of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal leveled sharp criticism at the internal conflicts within the Arab world and called to halt Israel’s “Jewish offensive” against its Arab neighbors, as he put it.

“Israel has to realize that peace is the only solution for its survival,” said the Saudi foreign minister. “As we see, Israel does not shy away from taking its terror to any level, with total disregard to any laws, rules, religious edicts or humanitarian considerations to achieve its goals. Its only objective is to uproot the Palestinian existence wherever it is.”

Al-Faisal spoke at a meeting in the Saudi city of Jedda, with inter alia Palestinian Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah and 55 other representatives of Muslim countries participating.

Saudi Arabia sees itself as the leader of the Sunni Muslim world, but it generally acts behinds the scenes. The foreign minister’s statement was an unusual remark for Saudi diplomacy. Reuters News Agency, which quoted the statement, emphasized that the authorities in Riyadh do not trust the Hamas regime and even consider it a terrorist organization due to its affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood sect.

The London-based international Saudi newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat had earlier published remarks that sounded slightly more refined, declaring that there was no longer an Arab-Israeli conflict but an Iranian-Turkish-Israeli conflict. “If Israel wants to make a grand deal with the Arabs, now is the time,” it wrote.

Foreign Ministry pooh-poohs Lapid plan for regional Gaza conference

August 12, 2014

Foreign Ministry pooh-poohs Lapid plan for regional Gaza conference

Senior official says even latest ‘Transformers’ movie is more realistic than finance minister’s planned powwow with Saudi Arabia

By Raphael Ahren August 12, 2014, 4:45 pm

via Foreign Ministry pooh-poohs Lapid plan for regional Gaza conference | The Times of Israel.

 

Finance Minister Yair Lapid, November 5, 2013 (photo credit: Roni Schutzer/Flash90)
 

inance Minister Yair Lapid’s plan to hold a regional conference with Saudi Arabia and other Arab states to discuss the future of Gaza is utterly unrealistic, a senior Foreign Ministry official said Tuesday.

In an unusually harsh response to Lapid’s latest diplomatic initiative, announced Monday, the senior official said that Saudi or Tunisian officials would never agree to participate in such a conference, despite some Arab countries’ unspoken approval of Operation Protective Edge.

“It’s pure science fiction. No, there’s no science in it. It’s pure fantasy,” the senior official told The Times of Israel, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “Not just that it’s not going to happen, it cannot possibly happen in any real-world scenario. It’s not even remotely reminiscent of reality.

“Even the latest ‘Transformers’ movie is more rooted in real life than this proposition,” he added, referring to the popular toy-cum-Hollywood franchise about robots from outer space that turn into cars.

Saudi officials “would rather die” than be seen in public with their Israeli counterparts, the official said.

Mocking Lapid’s ostensible naivete, he added: “I suggest that he starts picking up the phone and calling his colleagues in the aforementioned countries and starts making the arrangements.”

A source close to Lapid said he had no intention of responding to an anonymous official.

“As a member of the security cabinet and head of one of the largest parties in Knesset, Yair Lapid’s role is to create a framework which will provide security to the citizens of Israel, particularly in the South,” the source said.

On Monday, Lapid announced plans for a “diplomatic initiative” aimed to boost efforts to “demilitarize Gaza and the transfer of authority in the Gaza Strip to the Palestinian Authority while maintaining Israel’s strategic security interest.” According to the plan, Egypt would host a conference attended by the United States, the European Union, Russia, Jordan, the PA, Israel, “moderate Arab states including Saudi Arabia” and the Gulf states.

“The initiative also calls for the involvement of states which will provide economic support for the rehabilitation of the Gaza Strip and the creation of projects which will lead to long term economic cooperation in the region,” according to a press release Lapid’s media adviser issued Monday.

One part of the conference will deal with the “creation of economic ties between Israel, the Palestinian Authority and the Arab world,” the statement reads. It would include several Western countries, the UN, the World Bank, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia.

The senior Foreign Ministry official scoffed about the prospect of Riyadh and Tunis sending delegates to a conference attended by representatives from Jerusalem. “Doesn’t anyone know that Tunisia is not a moderate country anymore? Doesn’t anyone know that the Saudis would rather die in battle 120 times than be seen in public with Israel? The Saudis will never, ever be seen in public with any Israeli official.”

 

Saudi Prince Turki bin Faisal Al Saud (center) and Amos Yadlin (left) speak May 26 in Brussels, with journalist David Ignatius at right (photo credit: JTA)
 

The fact that Israel, Saudi Arabia and other so-called moderate countries in the region have common interests and clandestinely cooperate on intelligence and security issues is one of the Middle East’s worst-kept secrets. Sunni governments in particular are widely believed to support Operation Protective Edge, tacitly encouraging Israel to deal a harsh blow to Hamas, a terrorist organization they see as a threat to their own rule.

Last week, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed “the unique link which has been forged with the states of the region” as a “very important asset” for Israel that “will open new possibilities” as soon as the fighting ceases.

In May, Saudi Prince Turki bin Faisal al-Saud, the country’s former director of General Intelligence, publicly discussed regional issues with Maj. Gen. (res) Amos Yadlin, a former commander of the IDF’s Military Intelligence Directorate. During the unusual meeting, the prince politely turned down Yadlin’s invitation to visit Israel.

In April, Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman said Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and other Arab countries had quiet contacts with Israel and that they would be publicized within a year and a half. Saudi and Kuwaiti officials swiftly denied Liberman’s claim.

The Prime Minister’s Office declined to comment on Lapid’s initiative, which is set to be discussed at the upcoming cabinet meeting.

Government May Have to Decide if Money Buys Peace or War with Hamas

August 12, 2014

Money can’t buy love from Hamas. It can by a short cease-fire. It can buy war. It can’t buy peace.

By: Tzvi Ben-Gedalyahu Published: August 12th, 2014

via The Jewish Press » » Government May Have to Decide if Money Buys Peace or War with Hamas.

 

Naftali Bennett does not buy “money for calm.” Photo Credit: Flash 90

An idea on the negotiating table in Cairo that tax money collected by Israel for the Palestinian Authority would end up in the pockets of Hamas in exchange in exchange for a supposed truce was debunked Tuesday by key coalition government partner Naftali Bennett, who said the scheme is nothing short of extortion.

The Minister of the Economy and chairman of the Jewish Home Party, the third largest in the coalition, said the idea is one of “Pay us – we’ll shoot at your later; don’t pay us – we’ll shoot at you now.”

Israel previously has insisted that all money it transfers to the Palestinian Authority cannot reach Hamas, which is a fiction because the Palestinian Authority ends up paying for salaries of Hamas government “workers,” which includes “civil servants” with machine guns.

The government in the past also has used the tax money to pay off a huge debt owed to Israel Electric Corp.(IEC) by the electric company in the Palestinian Authority.

Most of the “news” on negotiations in Cairo between Hamas and Israel, mediated by Egypt in order to maintain the illusion that Israel and Hamas do not recognize each other, is based on the usual Hamas hyperbole and threats, and on more substantiated reports.

The guts of a proposed agreement reportedly would extend the 72-hour ceasefire due to expire on midnight Wednesday.

Israel would perform a very poor trick of magic by handing over the money to Hamas through a third party to fool itself that it is not paying Hamas directly.

That idea sent Bennett through the ceiling. “Extortion” and “dangerous” were only two of the unflattering adjectives he expressed. He warned that the money will be used by terrorists “who are digging under our feet… It’s a ‘calm for money to terrorists formula.’ You don’t pay Hamas, you defeat them.”

Bennett said he will fight the proposal if it comes to the Cabinet for a vote.

Israel reportedly is willing to ease the blockade without removing it completely, and Egypt would do the same at the border in the divided city of Rafah. Israel also is seriously considering extending the permitted fishing zone to six nautical miles and to allow, once again, construction materials to move into Gaza under supervision.

As with previous ceasefire agreements and concessions on the blockade, supervisory measures are questionable.

Hamas exploited Israel’s previous agreement to allow cement and other “dual-use” materials into Gaza and used them to build tunnels for terrorists, among other activities that were at the expense of building houses and schools. Even then, Hamas has used schools and homes, as well as mosques and hospitals, as rocket launching pads, so all “dual purpose” materials ultimately had only one purpose – terror.

Officially, “no progress” has been made in the talks. This is expected because Hamas always likes to keep everyone in suspense until the last minute, or even after the last minute.

For good measure, it has publicly threatened that any extended ceasefire would simply be a temporary measure until the next war. That can be dismissed as rhetoric in the short-term, but in the long-term, Hamas means what it says. Its existence depends on attacking Israel. If it does not, it risks losing its power to rival terrorist groups who would be happy to take over the task.

One of the most dangerous elements of a possible longer-term agreement for a truce is allowing security forces from the Palestinian Authority, headed by Mahmoud Abbas, to supervise the “Philadlphi” smuggling route at and near Rafah.

Abbas and Hamas have accepted each other as peace partners in a new unity government, which has carefully placed “technocrats” in the government, a camouflage for the grip over Gaza by Hamas and its full-fledged army.

Allowing the Palestinian Authority to supervise the border is the opening to giving Hamas the keys to the slaughterhouse.

Iraq crisis: ‘It is death valley. Up to 70 per cent of them are dead’

August 12, 2014

Iraq crisis: ‘It is death valley. Up to 70 per cent of them are dead’On board Iraqi army helicopter delivering aid to the trapped Yazidis, Jonathan Krohn sees a hellish sight

via Iraq crisis: ‘It is death valley. Up to 70 per cent of them are dead’ – Telegraph.

 

Mount Sinjar stinks of death. The few Yazidis who have managed to escape its clutches can tell you why. “Dogs were eating the bodies of the dead,” said Haji Khedev Haydev, 65, who ran through the lines of Islamic State jihadists surrounding it.

On Sunday night, I became the first western journalist to reach the mountains where tens of thousands of Yazidis, a previously obscure Middle Eastern sect, have been taking refuge from the Islamic State forces that seized their largest town, Sinjar.

I was on board an Iraqi Army helicopter, and watched as hundreds of refugees ran towards it to receive one of the few deliveries of aid to make it to the mountain. The helicopter dropped water and food from its open gun bays to them as they waited below. General Ahmed Ithwany, who led the mission, told me: “It is death valley. Up to 70 per cent of them are dead.”

Two American aid flights have also made it to the mountain, where they have dropped off more than 36,000 meals and 7,000 gallons of drinking water to help the refugees, and last night two RAF C-130 transport planes were also on the way.

However, Iraqi officials said that much of the US aid had been “useless” because it was dropped from 15,000ft without parachutes and exploded on impact.

Handfuls of refugees have managed to escape on the helicopters but many are being left behind because the craft are unable to land on the rocky mountainside. There, they face thirst and starvation, as well as the crippling heat of midsummer.

Hundreds, if not more, have already died, including scores of children. A Yazidi Iraqi MP, Vian Dakhil, told reporters in Baghdad:

“We have one or two days left to help these people. After that they will start dying en masse.”

The Iraqi Army is running several aid missions every day, bringing supplies including water, flour, bread and shoes.

The helicopter flights aim to airlift out refugees on each flight, but the mountains are sometimes too rocky to land on, meaning they return empty.

Even when it can land, the single helicopter can take just over a dozen refugees at a time, and then only from the highest point of the mountain where it is out of range of jihadist missiles. Barely 100 have been rescued in this way.

 

Displaced Yazidi people rush towards an aid helicopter (RUDAW)
 

The flights have also dropped off at least 50 armed Peshmerga, Kurdish forces, on the mountain, according to Captain Ahmed Jabar.

Other refugees have made their way through Islamic State lines, evading the jihadists to reach safety, or travelling through

Kurdish-controlled sections of Syria to reach the town of Dohuk. So far the Yazidi refugees left behind have survived by hiding in old cave dwellings, drinking from natural springs and hunting small animals, but with families scattered across Mount Sinjar, a barren range stretching for around 35 miles near the border with Syria, there are fears aid will not reach them all unless the humanitarian relief operation is significantly stepped up .

Hundreds can now be seen making their way slowly across its expanse, carrying what few possessions they managed to flee with on their backs. Exhausted children lie listlessly in the arms of their parents, older ones trudging disconsolately alongside while the sun beats down overhead.

The small amount of relief the peshmerga militia can bring up into the mountain is not simply enough.

One pershmerga fighter, Faisal Elas Hasso, 40, said: “To be honest, there’s not enough for everyone,” he said. “It’s five people to one bottle.”

The refugees who made it out described desperate scenes as they awaited help from the outside world.

“There were about 200 of us, and about 20 of that number have died,” said Saydo Haji, 28. “We can live for two days, not more.”

Emad Edo, 27, who was rescued in an airlift on Friday at the mountain’s highest point explains how he had to leave his niece, who barely had enough strength to keep her eyes open, to her fate.

“She was about to die, so we left her there and she died,” he said.

Others shared similar stories. “Even the caves smell very bad,” Mr Edo added. According to several of the airlifted refugees, the Geliaji cave alone has become home to 50 dead bodies.

Saydo Kuti Naner, 35, who was one of 13 Yazidis who snuck through Islamic State lines on Thursday morning, said he travelled through Kurdish-controlled Syria to get to Kurdistan.

He left behind his mother and father, too old to make the rough trip, as well as 200 sheep. “We got lucky,” he said. “A girl was running [with us] and she got shot.” He added that this gave enough cover for the rest of them to get away.

Mikey Hassan said he, his two brothers and their families fled up into Mount Sinjar and then managed to escape to the Kurdish city of Dohuk after two days, by shooting their way past the jihadists. Mr Hassan said he and his family went for 17 hours with no food before getting their hands on some bread.

The Yazidis, an ethnically Kurdish community that has kept its religion alive for centuries in the face of persecution, are at particular threat from the Islamists, who regard them as ‘devil worshippers’, and drove them from their homes as the peshmerga fighters withdrew.

There have been repeated stories that the jihadists have seized hundreds of Yazidi women and are holding them in Mosul, either in schools or the prison. These cannot be confirmed, though they are widely believed and several Yazidi refugees said they had been unable to contact Yazidi women relatives who were living behind Islamic State lines.

Kamil Amin, of the Iraqi human rights ministry, said: “We think that the terrorists by now consider them slaves and they have vicious plans for them.”

Tens of thousands of Christians have also been forced to flee in the face of the advancing IS fighters, many cramming the roads east and north to Erbil and Dohuk. On Thursday alone, up to 100,000 Iraqi Christians fled their homes in the Plain of Ninevah around Mosul.

 

Refugees said the American air strikes on IS positions outside Erbil were too little, too late. They said they felt abandoned by everyone – the central government in Baghdad, the Americans and British, who invaded in 2003, and now the Kurds, who had promised to protect them.

“When the Americans withdrew from Iraq they didn’t protect the Christians,” said Jenan Yousef, an Assyrian Catholic who fled Qaraqosh, Iraq’s largest Christian town, in the early hours of

Thursday. “The Christians became the scapegoats. Everyone has been killing us.”

The situation in Sinjar has irreparably damaged the notion of home for the Yazidis. For a large portion of them, the unique culture of the area will never return, and they will therefore have nothing to go back for.

“We can’t go back to Sinjar mountain because Sinjar is surrounded by Arabs,” said Aydo Khudida Qasim, 34, who said that Sunni Arab villagers around Sinjar helped Islamic State take the area. Now he as well as many of his friends and relatives want to get out of Iraq

altogether. “We want to be refugees in other countries, not our own,” he said.

*Additional reporting by Richard Spencer, Erbil

Bennett: Salary transfer to Hamas is calm for money to terrorism

August 12, 2014

Bennett: Salary transfer to Hamas is calm for money to terrorism

Senior minister slams agreement taking shape in Cairo, calling it a ‘dangerous euphemism’; ‘It’s a diplomatic protection: Pay us – we’ll shoot at your later, don’t pay us – we’ll shoot at you now,’ Bennett says.

Roi KaisLatest Update: 08.12.14, 16:10 / Israel News

via Bennett: Salary transfer to Hamas is calm for money to terrorism – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Economy Minister and member of the Security Cabinet, Naftali Bennett, has gone on the offensive on Tuesday against an agreement taking shape in Cairo with the Palestinian factions, the details of which were published for the first time on Ynet on Monday night.

Details of an agreement obtained by Ynet show Israel has agreed to ease the blockade on Gaza, but not lift it entirely. In contrast, there is no agreement to demilitarize Gaza, as demanded by Israel.

Ynet has learned that Israel will agree to transfer the Hamas government salaries through a third party – facilitating the payment of Hamas officials’ salaries. It was further agreed that Israel would gradually expand the fishing area off the Gaza coast, initially expected to be six nautical miles. It was also decided that construction materials will enter Gaza under close supervision.

Bennett called the expected salary transfer “a dangerous euphemism. It’s a diplomatic protection: Pay us – we’ll shoot at your later, don’t pay us – we’ll shoot at you now.”

Bennett said that if this proposal goes to a vote in the cabinet, he will work with all of the tools at his disposal to convince the other ministers to reject it.

“The money will be transferred to the terrorists who are digging under our feet, to the rocket manufacturers, and to those who shoot at us. It’s very simple. It’s a ‘calm for money to terrorism’ formula,” he said.

The economy minister claimed this would “both leave the state of Israel with the continuation of Hamas’ strengthening, and harm our deterrence.”

“You can’t fight Hamas with one hand, and fund it with the other. The claim the money won’t go to terrorism when you give it to Hamas is false, to say the least, and this is exactly why Hamas is insisting on getting this funding,” he added.

Another issue close to agreement is that Israel will double the number of trucks entering Gaza through the Kerem Shalom crossing to approximately 600 trucks per day. Similarly, a decision by Israel to increase the monthly quota of permits for entry into the Gaza Strip through the Erez crossing is also close to being finalized. At the same time, criteria for entry into Israel from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank will be broadened.

A member of the Palestinian delegation told a Islamic-Jihad affiliated news site on Tuesday that a long-term ceasefire agreement could be reached by Wednesday.

The source claimed the agreement would include the lifting of the Gaza blockade, but failed to provide any details on that.

Islamic Jihad spokesman Yusef al-Hasayina told the site the Palestinian delegation is halfway through discussions on the major issues on the table.

“The Egyptian side has agreed to significant easing on the Rafah border crossing. There’s great determination among the Palestinian delegation to reach a real agreement that will bring to the end of the aggression and removal of the siege. Things in the Cairo talks will become clearer during the next 24 hours,” al-Hasayina said.

An Israeli official, on the other hand, was quoted by the media on Tuesday morning as saying no progress has been made in the talks.

“The gaps between the sides are big and there is no progress in the negotiations,” said an Israeli official, who declined to be named. There was no immediate comment from Hamas, the Islamist group that dominates Gaza.

A Palestinian official with knowledge of the Cairo talks told Reuters, on condition of anonymity: “So far we can’t say a breakthrough has been achieved … Twenty-four hours and we shall see whether we have an agreement.”

In the negotiations held Monday, the parties did not reach an understanding regarding the Gaza ports. Hamas sources in the Gaza Strip said Monday evening that it would be possible to delay in dealing with the airport and seaport if Israel agrees to the rest of their requirements. The sources noted that such a situation would still require an agreement in principle for the establishment of the ports.

Attila Somfalvi and Reuters contributed to this report.

Hamas Says Truce Would Only Be to Plan Next War

August 12, 2014

Hamas Clarifies Truce Would Only Be to Plan Next War

Hamas leadership in Gaza and Qatar reportedly divided over continuing terror war or stopping to ‘plan next campaign.

‘By Ari YasharFirst Publish: 8/12/2014, 3:55 PM

via Hamas Says Truce Would Only Be to Plan Next War – Defense/Security – News – Arutz Sheva.

 

Hamas Al-Qassam Brigades terrorist Reuters
 

Even as Israeli representatives are in Cairo to discuss a truce with Hamas on Tuesday, the terrorist group is taking pains to clarify it has no intentions of desisting from trying to wipe Israel off the map.

Hamas’s “military wing,” the Al-Qassam Brigades, released a statement presenting its position on the ongoing talks in Egypt.

“The warriors in Gaza are waiting with Allah’s help to renew the fighting, or to return to planning the next campaign. There’s no escape. Either jihad or planning (for the next jihad),” declared the statement.

The remarks leave no doubts that even in the case of a truce, from Hamas’s perspective the lull in fighting would only be an opportunity to rearm for the next terror war on the Jewish state. This facet is particularly concerning in light of reports of Israel agreeing to finance Hamas’s officials in Gaza as part of an agreement.

Slamming this proposal, Economics Minister Naftali Bennett (Jewish Home) stated Monday “this is political protection money: you pay us, then we’ll shoot you later; you don’t pay us, then we’ll shoot you right now. …It is impossible to fight our enemy with one hand and to fund it with the other.”

Further demonstrating how Hamas appears to view the talks as a chance for financial gains and to prepare for the next round of fighting is analysis suggesting that Hamas agreed to the current 72-hour ceasefire, which began on Sunday night at 12 a.m., as a means to gain Saudi and UAE funds.

Hamas divided over ending or continuing the war

Azzam al-Ahmed, the head of the Palestinian Authority (PA) delegation in Cairo for the truce talks, told Walla! on Tuesday that the talks are advancing, but “the gaps are still wide.”

The PA official, who represented Fatah in the Hamas unity deal in April and led negotiations in forming the unity government, insisted that Hamas’s period of controlling Gaza is over, and called for Israel to concede to Hamas demands for a sea and airport while supporting the PA in taking control of the Hamas enclave.

Another senior official from the PA delegation told Walla! that there are estimations that the current ceasefire may be extended by an additional 72-hour period.

Revealing Hamas’s position on the talks, the official commented “I’m still not sure that there’s a decision by Hamas to end this war.”

“There’s a great disagreement now between the Hamas leadership in Qatar headed by Khaled Mashaal, and between the senior members of the organization in Gaza. Doha (Qatar’s capital – ed.) is urging Mashaal all the time not to agree to Egypt as an intermediary,” disclosed the official.

The Gaza branch of Hamas also seems to hold enmity towards Egypt; just this week a senior Hamas leader, Mustafa Sawaf, urged the Palestinian Arab negotiating team to reject Egypt as an intermediary and find another third-party country to help Hamas realize its demands.

Liberman to ‘Post’: First get rid of Hamas, then hold PA elections, then pursue regional accord

August 12, 2014

Liberman to ‘Post’: First get rid of Hamas, then hold PA elections, then pursue regional accord

By HERB KEINONLAST UPDATED: 08/12/2014 15:34

As long as Hamas is strong on the ground, controls Gaza, and is popular in Judea and Samaria, a diplomatic process is simply impossible,” foreign minister says.

via Liberman to ‘Post’: First get rid of Hamas, then hold PA elections, then pursue regional accord | JPost | Israel News.

 

Avigdor Liberman Photo: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST
 

Getting rid of Hamas is a necessary condition for any wider diplomatic breakthrough, Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman told The Jerusalem Post in an interview on Tuesday.

“In order to make a diplomatic process possible, we have to get rid of Hamas,” he said. “As long as Hamas is strong on the ground, controls Gaza, and is popular in Judea and Samaria, a diplomatic process is simply impossible.”

Liberman’s comments came following skeletal diplomatic plans presented recently by two of his colleagues on the eight-person security cabinet: Justice Minister Tzipi Livni and Finance Minister Yair Lapid. Each of those plans leaned heavily on the Palestinian Authority, with Livni calling for a renewal of negotiations with the PLO (of which the PA is an organ), and Lapid calling for an international conference.

The foreign minister, during the interview conducted in his Jerusalem office, said it would be a mistake to build any process right now based on PA President Mahmoud Abbas.

“Abu Mazen’s [Abbas’s]legitimacy does not exist,” he said. “After we get rid of Hamas, the next stage is elections… We have to sign an international agreement with somebody with whom there is no doubt whether he has the authority to sign an agreement with us.”

Abbas does not have that legitimacy or authority, because there has not been an election in the PA since 2006, Liberman said.

“First topple Hamas, then elections, then a diplomatic process,” he said.

But the diplomatic process Liberman envisions is not a return to Oslo-style separate negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. Rather, he envisions something much larger, which he termed a “regional comprehensive solution.”

“It is important to emphasize that our conflict is not a conflict with the Palestinians. Therefore, all the attempts to solve the conflict with the Palestinians failed,” he said.

The failure on the Palestinian track time after time was because of a faulty diagnosis, he stressed.

Israel’s conflict is not with the Palestinians, but rather with the Arab world, and has three dimensions: the Arab countries, the Palestinians, and the “split identity” of the Israeli Arabs, Liberman said. What was needed was one package that would solve – or as he said, “arrange” – Israel’s “relations with all three dimensions at one time.”

“This is the only way it will work,” he said. “The Palestinians alone do not have the critical mass to finish a deal with Israel that will demand many difficult decisions. If they do not feel that the Arab world is with them, they will not do it.”

In a departure from his position in the past, Liberman said the 2002 Saudi initiative could form a “basis” for arranging Israel’s relations with the Arab world, as long as it does not include any reference to a Palestinian right of refugee return.

“I think the Saudi initiative is much more relevant today than it was previously,” he said, adding that the central idea behind the initiative was not only an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, but also an arrangement with the entire Arab world.

Asked what has changed to make him more amenable to the Saudi initiative, the foreign minister said there was a greater commonality of interests than there was a decade ago between Israel and the moderate Arab world.

Liberman pointed out that at the summit in Riyadh in March between US President Barack Obama and Saudi King Abdullah, the Saudi monarch – according to media reports – raised three issues: Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the spillover effect of the conflict in Syria on the region.

“These are exactly the three problems bothering us,” he said. “So where there is a commonality of interests that is clear to everyone, there is an opportunity.”

While a separate agreement with the Palestinians would only be a “headache” for Israel, since there would be constant demands and friction over issues such as border crossings and taxes, there would be benefits in a wider arrangement that includes ties with Saudi Arabia and the moderate states in the Persian Gulf, Liberman said. “I think they understand now that no one from the outside will solve the problems of the Middle East,” he said.

He stressed that such an arrangement would have to include arrangements regarding the Israeli Arabs, and that he would insist on redrawing borders to transfer land and populations.

“When talking about [land] swaps, the [Arab] Triangle [east of Kfar Saba] needs to be part of a future Palestinian state,” he said, restating a position he has long advocated.

Liberman said he could not countenance a situation whereby Israeli citizens hold a sympathy strike with Hamas in Gaza during a time of war, while Israelis – both Jews and Muslims – were being killed by Hamas.

“From my perspective, those who identify with Hamas during a time of war should not be Israeli citizens,” he said, adding that the “dividing line” was not whether one was Jewish, Christian or Muslim, but rather whether one was loyal to the state, its symbols and values.

Studies were under way to check the feasibility of his ideas, Liberman said. An international conference would be the last stage of this “regional comprehensive solution,” and numerous understandings would have to be drawn up beforehand, he said.

Liberman said the commonality of interests he spoke of was not only recognized by governments, but was trickling down to the people as well.

“In order to understand what is happening in the Arab world, to see the difference in the Arab world, turn on Al Jazeera and Al-Arabiya to see how things are broadcast,” he said. “ It is like night and day.

While he characterized the Qatar-backed Al Jazeera as a “brainwashing tool” for global terrorist movements, he said the Saudi-supported Al-Arabiya “understands that the central problem is the Muslim Brotherhood, and that the suffering in Gaza is not because of Israel, but because of Hamas.”

While extremely critical of the role Qatar is playing by funding terrorist groups not only in the Middle East, but also in Africa, Asia and even Europe, he did not exaggerate the leverage the country has over Hamas.

Qatar was hosting Hamas and other terrorist organizations in Doha, and funding them handsomely, to ensure that they only operate outside Qatar, the foreign minister said. He characterized this as Qatar paying “protection money” to the terrorist organization.

“It is paying protection money in order to ensure security and quiet and calm inside Qatar, so they would work only outside,” he said. “I don’t know how much they are able to influence Hamas. I think Hamas has more influence on Qatar, than Qatar does on Hamas.”

Liberman was not optimistic about the outcome of the cease-fire talks being held in Cairo, saying that Hamas’s minimum demands were much more than Israel could give – in both the short and long terms. In the short term, he said, Hamas will stymie Israel’s demands for disarmament of Gaza, and also the introduction of any effective supervisory mechanism to ensure that money and construction materials pouring into the Strip after the conflict will not be diverted for Hamas’s use.

Furthermore, certain long-term goals of Hamas – such as a sea port – are things that Israel could never agree to.

“Hamas’s ultimate demand for a sea port is designed to bypass all the supervisory mechanisms we want to set up,” Liberman noted. “It is clear that the whole idea of a sea port is to smuggle in weapons, construction materials, terrorists and advisers from Iran and other places.”

Regarding the composition of the UN Human Rights Council commission named to investigate the Gaza operation, Liberman would not say whether Israel would cooperate with the probe, saying “We don’t have to say what we are going to do.”

He did, however, blast the appointment to the panel of Canadian professor William Schabas, whom he said not only thinks that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu – but also former president Shimon Peres – needed to face charges at the International Criminal Court.

Considering Schabas’s record, Liberman said, he was surprised the UNHRC did not appoint Hamas head Khaled Mashaal to lead the inquiry, since their ideas about Israel are “more or less the same.”

On another issue, Liberman – when asked what he meant recently when he said that Israel would respond to Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s anti-Semitic comments if they continued after Sunday’s presidential elections – said that while Israel was not looking for any conflict or friction with anyone, “we cannot accept a situation where we are someone’s punching bag.”

“We are trying to preserve correct ties with Turkey,” Liberman said. “We have no interest in creating a conflict.”

He pointed out that trade with Turkey has increased over the past few years, and that the Foreign Ministry approved recent requests from Ankara to send drugs and humanitarian aid to Gaza, as well as to fly injured Palestinians to Turkey for medical treatment.

Bennett: Giving Hamas money in exchange for quiet is ‘political extortion’

August 12, 2014

Bennett: Giving Hamas money in exchange for quiet is ‘political extortion

‘By JPOST.COM STAFF 08/12/2014 14:08

Bennett says money given to pay salaries to Hamas employees will be used to fund more tunnels, rockets and terror; MKs say any deal must include return of bodies of IDF soldiers killed in Gaza.

via Bennett: Giving Hamas money in exchange for quiet is ‘political extortion’ | JPost | Israel News.

 

Naftali Bennett Photo: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST
 

As reports emerged Tuesday of a possible deal being crafted between Israeli and Palestinian negotiators to end more than a month of hostilities on the Gaza front, right-wing politicians began speaking out against making concessions to Hamas.

Economy Minister Naftali Bennett (Bayit Yehudi) addressed reports that Israel was considering agreeing to a Hamas demand to pay the back salaries of thousands of its employees in Gaza. “The ‘money for Hamas in exchange for quiet’ formula is political extortion,” he wrote on his Facebook page.

“Let’s tell the truth: the money will go to terrorists who are digging [tunnels] beneath us, to those producing missiles and to the people shooting at us,” the minister warned.

Bennett argued that the Hamas “extortionists,” were essentially saying, “Pay us, and we will shoot at you later; don’t pay us, and we will shoot at you now.”

He said that the “money to terrorists in exchange for quiet” formula would allow Hamas to recuperate after Operation Protective Edge and rearm itself for the next round of fighting.

“We can’t fight Hamas with one hand and fund them with the other,” he argued.

Bennett said that he was fighting to prevent Israel from agreeing to such cease-fire terms in the security cabinet’s discussions of the issues and he called on the other government ministers to do the same.

“You don’t pay Hamas, you defeat them,” he stated.

Deputy Transportation Minister Tzipi Hotovely (Likud) said that the emerging truce deal would “cancel out all the achievements of Operation Protective Edge and turn Hamas into the victor.”

She said that rather than give Hamas more benefits, Israel should worsen conditions in Gaza immediately. Hotovely called for Israel to halt shipments of goods to Gaza and to stop supplying electricity to the Strip.

Likud MK Miri Regev said that any cease-fire deal would have to require Hamas to return the bodies of St.-Sgt. Oron Shaul and Lt. Hadar Goldin, the two IDF soldiers killed in Gaza whose place of burial remains unknown. She said that an agreement would also have to include the understanding that Hamas will be held responsible for all rocket fire from Gaza and expect a heavier response from Israel to the fire.

Bayit Yehudi MK Orit Struck said that Israel “must staunchly oppose any deal that allows for money and building materials to enter Gaza without tight supervision that will completely prevent the development of new tunnels, weapons and terror.”

Struck added that Israel should not agree to allow any salaries to be paid to Hamas employees before the bodies of the IDF soldiers are returned.

Gaza ceasefire talks: Easing of blockade, but no demilitarization

August 12, 2014

Gaza ceasefire talks: Easing of blockade, but no demilitarization

Details of agreement obtained by Ynet show Hamas to receive overdue salary payments, construction materials will enter under close supervision.

Attila SomfalviPublished: 08.12.14, 00:47 / Israel News

via Gaza ceasefire talks: Easing of blockade, but no demilitarization – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Israel has agreed to ease the closure on the Gaza Strip, according to information obtained by Ynet regarding an apparent agreement between Hamas and Israel, achieved via Egyptian mediation at the negotiations currently underway in Cairo. In contrast, there is no agreement to demilitarize Gaza, as demanded by Israel.

Ynet has learned that Israel will agree to transfer the Hamas government salaries through a third party – facilitating the payment of Hamas officials’ salaries. It was further agreed that Israel would gradually expand the fishing area off the Gaza coast, initially expected to be six nautical miles. It was also decided that construction materials will enter Gaza under close supervision.

 

palestinian delegation in Cairo
 

Another issue close to agreement is that Israel will double the number of trucks entering Gaza through the Kerem Shalom crossing to approximately 600 trucks per day. Similarly, a decision by Israel to increase the monthly quota of permits for entry into the Gaza Strip through the Erez crossing is also close to being finalized. At the same time, criteria for entry into Israel from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank will be broadened.

In the negotiations held Monday, the parties did not reach an understanding regarding the Gaza ports. Hamas sources in the Gaza Strip said Monday evening that it would be possible to delay in dealing with the airport and seaport if Israel agrees to the rest of their requirements. The sources noted that such a situation would still require an agreement in principle for the establishment of the ports.

Israel is at present opposed to the establishment of air and sea ports in Gaza for fear they would be used by Hamas and other factions to smuggle weapons.

“The problem is not just the port,” said former Military Intelligence chief Major General (res.) Amos Yadlin several days ago. “If it were only the port, I think it could be stipulated that only monitored, civilian arrivals would be allowed. It would take four years to build, and Israel has already agreed in the past to a port in Gaza, during Yasser Arafat’s time.”

Regarding the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt – not a direct issue for Israel – it seems that the Egyptians and the Palestinians are moving toward handing control over to Palestinian Authority forces loyal to Mahmoud Abbas.

A source close to the Palestinian delegation in Cairo said Monday night that the talks between the Palestinian delegation and Israeli delegation had been continuously ongoing since 1 pm, with Egyptian mediation, with no set schedule. According to the source, the negotiations have been thorough and difficult, but the common denominator is that all parties are interested in reaching agreement and not returning to a further escalation of violence.

Israel’s delegation returned home Monday evening, and is expected to head back to Cairo Tuesday for further talks. The delegation includes Shin Bet chief Yoram Cohen; Defense Ministry Director of Policy and Political-Military Affairs Amos Gilad; Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s envoy Yitzhak Molcho; Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories Gen. Yoav Mordechai and Head of the IDF Planning Directorate Major General Nimrod Shefer.

No demilitarization, no port

Meanwhile, the Security Cabinet was to convene at noon Tuesday to hear the details of the agreements reached so far. A political source said that the issue of demilitarization, although it became a key talking point for Netanyahu during the fighting, was not expected to be included in the final agreement, and certainly not by Hamas.

“Hamas cannot say that it agreed to demilitarization, but the important thing is that the issue was raised,” the source said. While Israel wanted rehabilitation in return for demilitarization in Gaza, it is will likely to have to make do with making life easier for the Gazans without Hamas giving any guarantees it will decommission its weapons.

It seems that during the talks in Cairo, the demilitarization requirement was shelved along with Hamas’ demands for a seaport and airport. Cabinet ministers have made it clear that a port will be built if Hamas agrees to extreme demilitarization.”

Several ministers have expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that the talks in Cairo were conducted without informing them of their progress.

“When the agreements are presented, the ministers will rubber-stamp them because it would be very difficult to change any items,” said one minister.

It has not yet been clarified whether there will be a Cabinet vote on the agreements reached in Cairo.

Elior Levy and Roi Kais contributed to this report