Iranian-Hizballah forces join Syria’s South offensive

Posted June 28, 2018 by Joseph Wouk
Categories: Uncategorized

Source: Iranian-Hizballah forces join Syria’s South offensive – contrary to Russian pledges – DEBKAfile

In breach of Russian guarantees to the US, Israel and Jordan, Iranian Revolutionary Guards, Shiite and Hizballah forces are taking part in Syria’s offensive to capture Daraa and Quneitra.

Video clips published on June 26 by social media depicted members of the Iraqi Shiite Liwa Zulfiqar militia in the main square of Busra al-Harir north of Daraa city celebrating their victory over Syrian rebel forces.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report that it was only a matter of time before the Russian pledges were proved hollow and pro-Iranian and Hizballah forces reached the Syrian-Jordanian and Syrian-Israeli borders.

The Liwa Zulfiqar militia, which came from Iraq, has been revamped for the operation as a mixed force including also Hizballah and Syrian fighters. They serve under the overall command of the Revolutionary Guards Regional Command Center which is based at the southern Syrian town of Izra.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is in charge of US policy for Syria, made some harsh comments to the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on Wednesday, June 27. He admitted that president Bashar Assad had come out well from Syria’s seven years of civil war, but he also called Iran’s presence in the country “the greatest threat.”

Pompeo accused Hizballah, which is totally bankrolled by Tehran, of being “active on multiple fronts and running efforts for external plotting including in the United States.”

However, the Secretary did not specify what action, if any, the US was taking to counter Iranian and Hizballah’s nefarious presence in Syria.

The Syrian operation meanwhile drew closer to Israel’s Golan border with an air strike on Wednesday night, June 27, against rebel positions around Quneitra to soften their resistance to the coming ground offensive.

Analysis: How Gulf states can get Europe to abandon Iran 

Posted June 28, 2018 by Joseph Wouk
Categories: Uncategorized

Source: Analysis: How Gulf states can get Europe to abandon Iran – Middle East – Jerusalem Post

The Gulf countries, with their economic might, have tremendous potential to influence change in the policies of European countries toward Iran.

BY BENJAMIN WEINTHAL
 JUNE 27, 2018 22:45
Analysis: How Gulf states can get Europe to abandon Iran

The protests sweeping across Iran are a clear sign the country’s economy and its Islamic revolutionary system are ready to buckle.

The Gulf states can play a critical role in stymieing the Tehran regime’s financing of terrorism across the Middle East by pushing Europe to pull the plug on investments in Iran.

Take for example the economic and diplomatic measures taken by Saudi Arabia against Germany for Chancellor Angela Merkel’s largely pro-Iranian regime foreign policy. The kingdom’s Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman is “deeply offended” by the German government and froze new business with the Federal Republic. In November 2017, Riyadh withdrew its ambassador from Berlin, to punish then-foreign minister Sigmar Gabriel’s claim that Lebanon “could not tolerate the adventurism that has spread there,” a reference to Saudi efforts to stunt the ever-increasing control by Hezbollah and Iran of the Land of the Cedars.

On the economic front, Bloomberg News reported in March that Saudi government agencies had been told not to renew some nonessential contracts with German companies. Deutsche Bank’s investments in the kingdom were among those at risk, as is its possible participation in energy giant Saudi Aramco’s forthcoming initial public offering, which “could be the largest share sale ever.”

All of this reinforces a prescient 2016 Wall Street Journal column written by my colleague Mark Dubowitz, the chief executive of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, and David Weinberg, who is now at the Anti-Defamation League.

“Riyadh holds sovereign-wealth funds valued at almost $700 billion, and its pension funds have foreign investments of about $70b.,” they wrote. “Those sums alone give the kingdom enormous leverage over anyone considering investing in Iran. Saudi Arabia could make the financial players choose a side: They can have Riyadh’s business or Tehran’s, but not both.”

Germany exported goods and services worth €6.6b. ($7.7b.) to Saudi Arabia in 2017, according to the Federal Republic’s statistics office. By contrast, German exports to the Islamic Republic of Iran reached €3.5b. in 2017, up from €2.6b. in 2016. France and Britain are also engaged in, and seeking additional, massive trade deals with the Saudis.

As Dubowitz and Weinberg wrote, “Riyadh projects long-term opportunities for foreign investment at $344b. Muhammad bin Salman, the kingdom’s economic czar (and the king’s son), has embarked on a privatization program that will likely increase the size of this pie.”

Questions abound regarding the kingdom’s next move – along with its Gulf allies the UAE, Bahrain and other Arab League countries that are opposed to Iranian aggression – in their efforts to pressure Europe to slash ties with Iran.

Without question, the time is ripe – if the Gulf monarchies wish to flex their economic muscle in Europe – to further tighten the economic vice on the clerical regime in Tehran. The Financial Times reported on Wednesday, “The Iranian economy is expected to deteriorate further.” The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that the US expects all countries to cut oil imports from Iran to “zero” by November 4 or risk sanctions, a senior State Department official said. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is showing signs of acute anxiety about the protests of ordinary Iranians against his regime, stating on Wednesday in a meeting, “the judiciary must confront those who disrupt economic security.”

Potent US sanctions and restrictions on Iran’s purchasing power coupled with sanctions on Tehran’s energy and oil business – to be implemented in 2018 – will surely compound the economic chaos in the Islamic Republic.

An additional and largely underutilized diplomatic pressure point: the Gulf countries could encourage European foreign ministers to follow the lead of US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Iran. He tweeted on Wednesday, “Iran’s corrupt regime is wasting the country’s resources on Assad, Hezbollah, Hamas & Houthis, while Iranians struggle. It should surprise no one #IranProtests continue. People are tired of the corruption, injustice & incompetence of their leaders. The world hears their voice.”

Writing on The Washington Examiner website on Monday, Michael Rubin, a scholar in resident at the American Enterprise Institute, neatly captured the trajectory of the Islamic Republic of Iran: “Like the Soviet Union and all other regimes that depend on repression rather than the consent of the governed, it is doomed to fail. The question has never been if, but when. And, increasingly, as regime officials send tens of billions of dollars outside the country, as Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei nears the end of his life, as the economy continues its death spiral, and as protests now spread to the Tehran bazaar, it seems that the answer to that question could be tantalizingly near.”

The Gulf countries, with their economic might, have tremendous potential to influence change in the policies of European countries toward Iran. Its use could represent a tipping point in economic warfare against Iran’s regime, thwarting its drive for nuclear weapons and halting its terrorism throughout the region.

Arab media leaks Trump’s “deal of the century” and Egypt’s role in it

Posted June 28, 2018 by davidking1530
Categories: Uncategorized

Obviously take this with a grain of salt but…

Arab (more precisely, Arabic – Palestine Today) media has provided a description of what role Egypt would play in Trump’s so-called “deal of the century” – the deal to end the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

The article is in Arabic, but I have used Google translate to get an English version. Google translate does a pretty good job converting Arabic to English, so I have not amended anything.

This proposal sounds very interesting. More interesting is that Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan are all (apparently) prepared to accept it, even if the Pally’s don’t… (and they would never accept anything that doesn’t include the so-called “right of return” and destruction of Israel’s jewish character).

The deal would seem to also have the effect of driving out of the Sinai the Isis-types, which have been a cause of concern for Egypt, hence it seems feasible that Egypt would be on side (as per the bit in blue). Trump sure does know how to do crafty deals…

Be good to see the Israel haters response if everyone (including Arab states) accepts the plan, but the Pally’s don’t. That would fully expose what most of us have known all along: the Pally’s and their supporters aren’t interested in “peace”, but instead are only interested in the eradication of the Jewish state.

I have seen this approach referred to as the “outside in” approach. Traditionally, the resolution of the Israel-Pally conflict was seen as a precusor to Israel achieving peace/acceptance with the Arab nations.

On the other hand, the “outside in” approach seeks to gain the support/acceptance of the Arab nations before peace is achieved in the Israel-Pally conflict (ie acceptance from other Arab nations is seen as driving the peace deal).

Of course, the beauty of the “outside in” approach is that will make abundantly clear to everyone the true motivation of the Pally’s when they refuse to accept the deal, and yet again, they fail to accept the opportunity placed right before their eyes. They never fail to achieve defeat in the face of victory….

But before the article I have pasted links-only to two other articles: the first where the Pally’s refute the speculated deal and that the Arab nations are on side with the US, and the second where Hamas claims Russia is against the speculated deal.

I suggest you take these two articles with an even bigger grain of salt…

PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY: NO ARAB PRESSURE TO ACCEPT TRUMP’S PEACE PLAN

https://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Palestinian-Authority-No-Arab-pressure-to-accept-Trumps-peace-plan-560864

Hamas claims Russia opposes Trump peace plan

https://www.timesofisrael.com/hamas-claims-russia-against-trump-peace-plan/

Egyptian agreement on the “deal of the century”: Sinai is essential in the plan

https://paltoday.ps/ar/post/325810/%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%82%D8%A9-%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%B5%D9%81%D9%82%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B1%D9%86-%D8%B3%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%A3%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D8%B7%D8%A9

Trump to settle the Palestinian issue known as the “Deal of the Century”, which was discussed during the last round in the region by his brother-in-law and adviser, Jared Kouchner, and his envoy to the region, Jason Greenblatt, From Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Qatar.

The sources said the meeting, which brought together Kouchner and Greenblatt with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Foreign Minister Sameh Shukri and intelligence chief General Abbas Kamel in Cairo last week, touched on the details of the deal, which is being hampered by the Palestinian Authority’s refusal to respond.

The sources explained that the talks of Kouchner in Cairo touched on the details of the Egyptian contribution to the deal, which will be through the Sinai Gate, specifically North Sinai, which has been identified a major role in the plan, to serve as a “cornerstone,” the sources said, pointing to That the establishment of a free trade zone on the border between the Gaza Strip and Rafah, Egypt, in addition to the establishment of a giant power station in the area dedicated to production of the Gaza Strip with full funding of more than $ 500 million.

The North Sinai section of the US plan for the settlement of the Palestinian issue also includes the establishment of a joint Egyptian-Gaza seaport, which will be fully supervised by Egypt and will be operated by the sector. In addition, the project includes, according to the sources, the allocation of an Egyptian airport in the north of Sinai to serve the people of the sector, to be under the supervision and employment of Egypt in full, as well as the establishment of a large industrial area on the border between the two countries, funded by the Gulf.

The sources stressed that this formula has become very welcome in the Egyptian political circles, instead of the principle of land exchange, which was a popular Egyptian rejection, pointing out that the current perception will facilitate the popular marketing, especially as these projects will be implemented on Egyptian territory, Which will join a group of Saudi projects in South Sinai as part of the giant Neum project, which is being adopted by the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, with the participation of Egypt, Jordan and Israel.

The sources stressed that there are Israeli requirements to implement these steps and all the projects allocated to the Gaza Strip within the framework of inflating it into a Palestinian state, in addition to what is left of the West Bank that has not been consumed by the settlements and other than Jerusalem as well. These requirements are to be subject to supervision, , To ensure that they are not used in “any activities hostile to Israel”.

The sources pointed out that the Egyptian government in the context of the semi-final scenario, will in the coming period, specifically the new fiscal year, to start expanding the buffer zone in Sinai, and the evacuation of larger areas, to facilitate the implementation of those proposed projects after that, to be all the land is allocated uninhabited.

In the same context, the Egyptian parliament approved the opening of a new appropriation in the state budget, about 70 billion pounds (about 4 billion dollars) earmarked for additional government expenditure items, which included payment of compensation expected to the people of Sinai. The text of the law, which was approved by the parliament on Sunday in its first article, stipulates that an additional appropriation of the state budget for the fiscal year 2017-2018 of 70 billion three hundred million pounds, distributed on the third section of the “benefits”, will be added to the amount of 57 billion pounds The benefits of local and external public debt, and also the fifth section “other expenses”, in the amount of two billion and three hundred million pounds, to meet the payment of compensation in the province of North Sinai.

Egyptian and Arab diplomatic sources confirmed to the “new Arab” earlier that the first phase of the Trump plan includes a package of measures estimated at about 3 billion dollars pledged by Gulf countries to bear them in full.

The White House issued a statement after Kouchner and Greenblatt’s visit to Cairo, saying that the meeting “discussed increased cooperation between the United States and Egypt, the need to facilitate humanitarian access to Gaza, and Trump’s efforts to facilitate peace between Israelis and Palestinians.” Egyptian Ambassador to Egypt, Ambassador Bassam Radhi, said that Sisi affirmed Egypt’s support for international efforts and initiatives aimed at reaching a just and comprehensive settlement in accordance with agreed international terms and on the basis of the two-state solution according to the 1967 borders. To review the efforts exerted by Egypt to complete the process of Palestinian reconciliation and calm the situation in Gaza and its measures to alleviate the suffering of the residents of the Gaza Strip, including the opening of the Rafah crossing throughout the month of Ramadan.

 

 

Gaza terror groups: We’re ready for all Israeli military activities

Posted June 27, 2018 by Peter Hofman
Categories: Uncategorized

Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad terror groups issue joint statement claiming responsibility for 13 rockets fired into Israel overnight Tuesday, which they say was in retaliation for IDF’s earlier attack on Hamas commander’s vehicle; ‘A bombing will be answered with a bombing,’ statement warns.

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5297828,00.html

The joint military branches of terror organization in the Gaza Strip said Wednesday that they are prepared for to retaliate against any Israeli military activities after a to and fro round of violence beset the border that began Tuesday evening and continued into the night.

The terror organizations in the strip took responsibility Wednesday afternoon for a barrage of rockets that were fired at Israeli border communities overnight Tuesday, which they claim was a response to an Israeli attack on a Hamas militant’s vehicle.

Vehicle attacked in Gaza

“A bombing will be answered with a bombing,” a statement issued from the strip said, adding that they are ready to retaliate immediately to any Israeli military provocation.

On Tuesday night, the IDF bombed a vehicle belonging to one of the commanders of Hamas’ military wing in the Neuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip. Shortly afterwards, 13 rockets were fired from the Hamas-ruled coastal enclave at adjacent Israeli communities.

The IDF confirmed in a statement issued early Wednesday that the army attacked “a vehicle belonging to a Hamas operative in a cell launching explosive and incendiary balloons” with an aircraft and a tank.

The IDF said it also struck two of the organization’s observation posts in the northern Gaza Strip. “At the same time,” the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit said in its statement, “the Hamas terror organization led a high-trajectory fire attack on the State of Israel. Hamas will pay for the terror and instability.”

The first Code Red siren sounded at 1:40 am at a kibbutz in the Sha’ar Hanegev Regional Council. The IDF Spokesperson Unit said one rocket had been fired. Residents reported hearing an explosion.

Scene of the strike

At least three of the rockets were intercepted by the Iron Dome air defense system. There were no reports of injuries.

Throughout the night, sirens sounded in other communities in the Sha’ar Hanegev, Hof Ashkelon, Eshkol and Sdot Negev regional council. At 4:01 am, a siren sounded in the city of Sderot as well.

The IDF Spokesperson’s Unit said a total of 12 rockets and mortar shells had been fired into Israel.

A Palestinian source told Ynet that the attacked vehicle was completely destroyed, but that there were no injuries in the strike and that the driver escaped unharmed. The strike took place in the western side of the Nuseirat refugee camp. Hamas closed off the area and stopped people from approaching it.

At first, the IDF refused to confirm that Israel was behind the strike, saying: “We won’t address foreign reports.” Hamas, however, rushed to announce that “a bombing will be met with a bombing.”

In another statement issued later on, Hamas said: “The Israeli escalation and the attacks on protestors and on military operatives led to a quick response from the resistance, as part of its complete readiness to carry out its mission to defend the Palestinian people.”

An incendiary balloon dispatched from the Gaza Strip was found Tuesday evening in Kibbutz Dorot in the Sha’ar Hanegev Regional Council. There were no injuries. Earlier, an IAF aircraft attacked a vehicle used by a cell of incendiary balloon launchers in the northern strip.

 

The tensions around Gaza have increased in recent weeks, as Gazans keep sending incendiary balloons and kites into Israel, causing more and more fires. The IDF has fired warning shots near the cells responsible for the kites and balloons and has even bombed Hamas targets, usually without causing any injuries. The terror organization, for its part, has stepped up its responses to the strikes and created the equation that “a bombing will be met with a bombing.”

Prince William to Abbas: ‘I’m glad our two countries work so closely together’

Posted June 27, 2018 by Peter Hofman
Categories: Uncategorized

The royal is expected to later meet with Palestinian youth, and to participate in events celebrating Palestinian culture, music and food

Britain’s Prince William, left, and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas meet in the West Bank city of Ramallah, Wednesday, June 27, 2018. (Alaa Badarneh/Pool Photo via AP)

Britain’s Prince William was greeted by an honor guard in the West Bank city of Ramallah on Wednesday before sitting down with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

“I’m very glad our two countries work so closely together and have had success stories with education and relief work in the past, so, long may that continue,” the royal told Abbas.

“My sentiments are the same as yours in hoping that there is a lasting peace in the region,” the prince said.

“The Palestinian side is committed to the peace process with the Israelis, so both states could live peacefully together within the borders of 1967,” Abbas responded.

Britain’s Prince William reviews honour guards before meeting with Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas in the West Bank city of Ramallah on June 27, 2018. (AFP/Ahmad Gharabli)

UK Ambassador to Israel David Quarrey last week defended describing Jerusalem’s Old City as being part of the “Occupied Palestinian Territories” in the prince’s itinerary.

“All the terminology that was used in the program was consistent with years of practice by British governments. It’s consistent with British government policy,” he told reporters.

“The duke is not a political figure,” Quarrey went on. “He’ll be here to see a little bit of the country and to get to meet some of the people here.”

The Duke of Cambridge, the second in line to the British throne, is expected to later meet with Palestinian young people, and to participate in events celebrating Palestinian culture, music and food.

On Wednesday morning he met with Israeli youth and took a stroll down Tel Aviv’s famed Rothschild Boulevard with Eurovision winner Netta Barzilai.

Britain’s Prince William poses for a group photo with Jewish and Arab children at the Neve Golan Stadium in the Israeli Mediterranean coastal city of Jaffa on June 26, 2018. (AFP/Pool/Heidi Levine)

On Tuesday, President Reuven Rivlin asked William to convey to Abbas “a message of peace.”

Hosting the duke in his official Jerusalem residence, Rivlin said the Palestinians need to accept that Jews have returned to their ancestral homeland and that it was about time Israelis and Palestinians end their conflict.

Prince William — the first member of the British royal family to make an official visit to Israel since the state was founded in 1948 — also expressed hope for peace in the Middle East.

On Tuesday evening, the royal hailed Israel as a vibrant country that “thrives on innovation, diversity, talent and excellence,” and said ties were at an all-time high.

He also promised Britain’s support in the quest for peace between Israel and its neighbors.

“I know I share a desire with all of you, and with your neighbors, for a just and lasting peace. The United Kingdom stands with you, as we work together for a peaceful and prosperous future,” he said at an event at the home of the British ambassador in Ramat Gan.

On Thursday, the duke is to tour Jerusalem’s Old City, where he is expected to visit the Western Wall, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and Al-Aqsa Mosque, though these visits have not been officially confirmed. He will also go to the Russian Orthodox Church of St. Mary Magdalene to visit the grave of his great-grandmother, Princess Alice.

A present .

Posted June 27, 2018 by Peter Hofman
Categories: Uncategorized

Just watch sport and even world cup soccer .

http://www.myfeed4u.com/section/football/

IDF Attacked Parked Car, After Making Sure Kite Launchers Were Gone

Posted June 27, 2018 by Peter Hofman
Categories: Uncategorized

IDF Attacked Parked Car, After Making Sure Kite Launchers Were Gone

Israelis living near the Gaza Strip border experienced yet another tense night in the south, as a warplane and a tank attacked a vehicle in the Nusseirat refugee camp belonging to a Hamas operative who leads a squad that launches firebomb kites and balloons at Israel. The IDF also attacked two Hamas observation posts in the northern Gaza Strip.

In response, Hamas launched a high-trajectory attack, and the IDF reports that 13 rocket launchings have been identified in Israeli territory. Ma’an cites a Hamas claim to 19 launches.

In any event, three rockets were intercepted by the Iron Dome aerial defense system, and, according to the IDF Spokesperson, there were no casualties in all those noisy and flashy exchanges of fire.

Which is the real story in the current nightly exchanges between the IDF and Hamas: they are staged, bloodless shows of patriotic valor with neither side trying to hurt the other side in a way that would start the slippery slope to an unavoidable war.

According to Hakol Hayehudi, the IDF continues to make sure no harm comes to enemy terrorists. The Tuesday night attack was against a parked vehicle belonging to a Hamas terrorist (most Israeli media call them “activists”), only after a professional IDF intelligence gathering operation had confirmed that the vehicle was empty and there was no fear that its owner would be hurt, God forbid.

Also, those two Hamas positions that were attacked were empty. Wouldn’t want to hurt a Hamasnik now, would we.

The reason behind this complicated ballet – or, if you prefer kabuki theater – is that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman, and the entire IDF brass don’t want a war, and neither does the Hamas leadership. But both must appease their rank and file, and so they continue to attack meaningless targets. Hamas, too, has been careful to shoot its rockets at meaningless civilian targets, with the proverbial hits on Israeli kindergartens early enough in the day so no one is hurt, thank God.

Meanwhile, the brazen arson terrorists continue to burn entire swaths of Israeli fields and forests, but those are insured, so it’s not so bad.

For future reference, keep this in mind: we will know that the IDF is serious about stopping Hamas when Arabs start getting killed in those attacks (God forbid).

Trump Admin-Tied Group Presents Plan for Israeli-Palestinian Peace

Posted June 27, 2018 by Peter Hofman
Categories: Uncategorized

Paper circulating on Capitol Hill would bolster White House effort to win peace

Gaza

Getty Images

BY:

Trump Admin-Tied Group Presents Plan for Israeli-Palestinian Peace

A think-tank with close ties to the Trump administration is circulating on Capitol Hill and elsewhere a new comprehensive plan on how the White House can foster Israeli-Palestinian peace following President Trump’s landmark decision to relocate the U.S. embassy in Israel to the country’s capital city of Jerusalem, according to a copy of the plan viewed by the Washington Free Beacon.

The Security Studies Group, or SSG, a foreign policy organization with close ties to top Trump administration officials, is seeking to garner support for the White House’s latest push to foster peace between Israel and the Palestinians. The plan presents a roadmap the administration can follow to achieve a two state solution for the parties.

Officials are focused on pressuring the Palestinian Authority government to rein in its support for terrorism and accept a good faith offer that could alter the regional balance for both the Israeli and Palestinian people, sources said.

Those who have reviewed the plan told the Free Beacon that SSG is laying the groundwork to counter the Obama administration’s efforts to pressure Israel into accepting a plan many said would compromise the Jewish state’s security. “This is the first comprehensive survey of what the diplomatic terrain looks like now that Trump has reversed many of Obama’s anti-Israel moves,” said one senior GOP congressional staffer familiar with the paper. “American diplomats have a range of new opportunities but also new challenges, because the Palestinians got used to having America slap around Israel for them, and since we’re now back in the business of supporting Israel they’ve been throwing a global temper tantrum and holding their breath until they turn purple.”

“This study lays out a lot of that, including what more can to be done to reverse the anti-Israel UN resolution Obama’s diplomats generated,” the source said.

In addition to outlining multiple failed attempts by past administrations to ink a peace plan, SSG’s paper provides a fresh pathway forward for the Trump administration on the heels of its decision to relocate the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, a move met with fanfare in Israel but with consternation by many Arab nations.

The paper, authored by Middle East expert Matthew RJ Brodsky, recommends the Palestinians be given the entirety of the Gaza Strip and around 96 percent of the territory linked to it by the West Bank.

The West Bank would subsequently be annexed by Israel by up to 10 percent to account for housing communities and other territory where Israelis have been living for decades. This would include critical land points such as the corridors along the Jordan Valley, according to the plan.

The plan also addresses the refugee issue, which has been a sticking point for some time as Israel seeks to retain the Jewish nature of its country. Accepting a mass wave of Palestinians into the country would fundamentally alter Israel’s population composition.

“The establishment of an independent Palestinian state will provide a national homeland for all Palestinians, including the refugees, and thereby bring an end to the historic Palestinian refugee issue and the assertion of any claims against Israel arising from it,” according to the plan.

Palestinian citizens would be permitted to resettle in a new Palestinian state or continue living in their host countries or other locales that would accept them. Israel would also be pressed to accept Palestinians for humanitarian reasons.

Jerusalem would remain Israel’s undivided capital city under the plan.

“This is a monograph that details the evolution of the conflict’s core issues and tracks their treatment in the three previous U.S.-led negotiating efforts that led to offers to end the dispute,” SSG said in a statement to the Free Beacon. “Entitled, ‘Resolving the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict,’ the SSG also offers what it believes could serve as a negotiating framework for a final status agreement that meets the goal of two states for two peoples with a Palestinian state for Palestinians alongside a secure state of Israel recognized as the nation-state of the Jewish people.”

Brodsky, the report’s author, told the Free Beacon that the Palestinians must be convinced to abandon violence and come to the negotiating table in earnest.

“The bottom line is that the Palestinian Authority needs to get a handle on its mythology, come to the table, and accept a reasonable statehood offer,” Brodsky said. “It will be good for the Palestinian people, the Israelis, and the region. For far too long they have not been honest with their own people, let alone themselves. The peace process isn’t like a fine bottle of wine that improves with age.”

“Each time they turn toward violence and away from the negotiating table, they spoil their future prospects,” he said. “Luckily, America’s regional allies recognize this and can hopefully provide some direction should [PA President Mahmoud] Abbas find himself lost in his own rhetoric again.”

The White House and State Department did not respond to requests for comment on the progress in peace talks over the past months.

Progress in law to withhold terrorist salaries

Posted June 27, 2018 by Peter Hofman
Categories: Uncategorized

Committee approves in second and third readings law to withhold terrorist salaries from tax revenues Israel transfers to PA.

Committee vote Im Tirtzu

The Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee approved in second and third readings the law to withhold terrorist salaries from tax revenues Israel transfers to the PA.

Only MK Robert Ilatov of Yisrael Beiteinu voted against the bill, which will be voted on in the Knesset plenum next Monday.

The bill was approved by the committee without the clause requested by Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Liberman, a clause that conditions the withholding on a decision of the political-security cabinet.

Bereaved families attending the meeting asked to transfer the funds allocated to a special fund for terror victims, but the committee’s legal advisor explained the move was legally improper.

Law initiator MK Maj. Gen. (res.) Elazar Stern (Yesh Atid) said “the insistence on principles and persistence paid off. The law was approved according to the original wording we submitted. What’s important to me is that no more families join the club of the bereaved and that the Palestinian Authority understand that supporting terror doesn’t pay.”

Knesset Member Avi Dichter (Likud) said, “This is a moral law that sends a clear message to us, to the Palestinian Authority as well as to the entire world: Israel will not be a conduit for transferring money to terrorists.”

Im Tirtzu movement Policy Department head Alon Schwartzer, whose movement is accompanying the bereaved families, welcomed the bill’s approval: “Approval of the bill in second and third readings despite the difficulties is an historic move.

“The State of Israel must do its utmost to stop Arab terror and this law is another step forward in creating a complete deterrence package against terrorism. We’ll continue to accompany the bereaved families who courageously and resolutely lead an uncompromising struggle against terror and for justice,” he added.

MK Robert Ilatov (Yisrael Beiteinu) explained his opposition to the law. “Committee members are celebrating and the bereaved families are crying outside the committee hall. The scandalous clause approved today, that I was the only one who opposed it, says that the money will not really be withheld from the Palestinian Authority, but will be kept on the side in a ‘savings fund’ with compound interest.

“Instead of sending populist messages and making videos for Twitter, I’d expect MKs who approved this clause to look the Israeli public in the eye and explain why at the end of the process, which was accompanied by many congratulations and smiles, the terrorist’s salaries will still reach the Palestinian Authority and eventually the terrorists.”

Erdogan win sets up prolonged stand-off with US

Posted June 27, 2018 by Joseph Wouk
Categories: Uncategorized

Source: Erdogan win sets up prolonged stand-off with US

Dave Clark

,

AFP
Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and US President Donald Trump, in New York in September 2017
Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and US President Donald Trump, in New York in September 2017 (AFP Photo/Brendan Smialowski)
More

Washington (AFP) – Washington’s chilly reaction to Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s election victory and consolidation of his presidential powers reflect expectations that no thaw in US-Turkish ties is imminent.

Erdogan’s position as Turkey’s leader remains strong, but his parliamentary majority now depends not just on his own AKP party but also on the nationalist MHP — no friend to America.

So in the medium term, despite opposition gains, he will have little room to compromise on the long list of issues that have hurt ties with NATO and with US President Donald Trump’s administration.

And in particular, Erdogan is now even less likely to bend on his key beef with Washington: Turkey’s determined opposition to the Pentagon’s continued support for Kurdish militia inside Syria.

“The fact that he had to enter a formal coalition with ultranationalists is very important,” said Asli Aydintasbas, political columnist and a fellow of the European Council on Foreign Relations.

“That dependency is going to be a difficult thing to manage at times,” she added, in a call with US-based journalists.

Soner Cagaptay, head of the Turkish Research Program at The Washington Institute, was also pessimistic about US-Turkish ties.

“If you thought Turkey’s foreign policy already had little room to maneuver on issues of Kurdish nationalism, you’re going to be surprised how that room is going to narrow down,” he said.

Warning that Erdogan’s tough stance has “near universal support” at home, he said: “Turkey is going to voice its opposition to US support for the YPG more frequently and more forcefully.”

As part of its strategy to defeat the jihadist Islamic State group in Syria and northern Iraq, the US-led anti-IS coalition has co-opted the Kurdish YPG militia into the so-called Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).

Turkey’s government — and a large majority of Turkish voters — see the YPG as little more than an offshoot of the “terrorist” PKK, with which Ankara has been at war for decades.

Turkish troops and allied Syrian Arab rebels have stormed one YPG enclave in northern Syria and now Ankara and Washington are in talks to defuse a stand-off around the town of Manbij.

Kemal Kirisci of the Brookings Institution noted that opposition calls for better relations with the European Union had not impressed voters as much as Erdogan’s “anti-Western narrative.”

– ‘Hostage diplomacy’ –

Nevertheless, he wrote, Turkey’s main challenges in its region and in Syria especially will come from Russia and Iran, suggesting Ankara may have to mend fences with its traditional allies.

But Syria is only one of a raft of issues complicating US-Turkish relations.

Under Erdogan, after a July 2016 coup attempt, dozens of Western citizens were arrested and many charged with terrorism offenses, in what some in Washington do not hesitate to call “hostage diplomacy.”

The case of Andrew Brunson, a Christian pastor who had been in Turkey for more than two decades has become a cause celebre and Trump’s administration has repeatedly demanded that he be freed.

Turkey, conversely, has demanded that the United States send home 77-year-old Fethullah Gulen, the exiled Islamic preacher and leader of a global movement who now lives in Pennsylvania.

Erdogan accuses Gulen of being behind the failed coup and some of the corruption allegations that had dogged his rule, but US authorities have requested evidence to back the extradition bid.

Yet another bone of contention concerns arms sales.

Despite being a leading NATO ally, Turkey has entered into an understanding to buy Russia’s advanced S-400 air defense system, in defiance of US sanctions on Moscow.

The State Department has protested and US lawmakers have suggested the deal could endanger a sale of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to Turkey.

Still more issues cloud ties — such as the behavior of Erdogan’s bodyguards, who have twice brawled with peaceful demonstrators in Washington — but things work out better behind the scenes.

– ‘Prickly nationalists’ –

US officials speaking on condition of anonymity say that when Erdogan is not playing up to his anti-American base work can be accomplished.

But they note that, while former secretary of state Rex Tillerson and national security adviser H.R. McMaster built a rapport with Ankara, their successors Mike Pompeo and John Bolton have yet to do so.

Colonel Rich Outzen, a US army and State Department policy advisor, said he hadn’t expected the election to make ties any easier, given the Turkish electorate’s 45 to 50 percent block of “prickly nationalists.”

Speaking in a personal capacity at a think tank event, he admitted that none of the outstanding disputes are “made any easier” by the result.

But he said talks on resolving Turkey’s concerns about Manbij and the border, while a “difficult process”, had left him “reasonably upbeat.”