Archive for May 27, 2019

Syria attempts to hit Israeli aircraft, IDF attacks in response

May 27, 2019

Source: Syria attempts to hit Israeli aircraft, IDF attacks in response – Breaking News – Jerusalem Post

The missile didn’t hit the Israeli aircraft, which was conducting a routine flight over northern Israel, and fell within Syrian territory.

BY JERUSALEM POST STAFF, SETH J. FRANTZMAN
 MAY 27, 2019 22:28An old military vehicle can be seen positioned on the Israeli side of the border with Syria, near th

Syrian forces shot an anti-aircraft missile at an Israeli fighter jet Monday evening, in response to which Israel attacked Syrian targets, the IDF spokesperson reported.

The missile didn’t hit the Israeli aircraft, which was conducting a routine flight over northern Israel, and fell within Syrian territory. The mission was completed as planned, the IDF said.

In response to the attempt, the IDF attacked the location from which the anti-aircraft missile was launched.

Arab media, meanwhile reported of air strikes near Quneitra.

Syria’s SANA reported that “a military source confirmed that at 2110 hours the Israeli enemy targeted one of our military positions east of Khan Arnabeh in rural Quneitra.”

The source explained that the aggression resulted in the “martyr’s death and wounding another fighter.”

According to Syrian media the strike took place near Khan Arnabeh which is very close to the Golan border and right next to line Bravo of the demilitarized zone near UNDOF areas. UN observers returned last summer after the Syrian regime retook this area near the border. An IDF statement said that Israel views with severity any threat to its aircraft and takes measures to defend them.

Last August Russia also deployed military police in southern Syria as part of the Syrian regime’s efforts to reconcile with the former rebel-held areas.

The attempt represents an escalation on the Syrian side. It is not the first time that Syria anti-aircraft missiles have targeted Israel, or the first time they have been detected heading toward Israeli airspace.

In January, Iron Dome was activated on Mount Hermon to intercept a rocket. In December 2018, a Syrian anti-aircraft missile was fired toward Israel from Syria. In November of 2018, fragments of a Syrian rocket were found in the Golan.  An F-16 crashed in the Galilee after being targeted by Syrian air-defense in October 2018. Rockets from Syria fell inside Israeli territory in July 2018.

David’s Sling was used operationally for the first time that month to defend against the rockets. In March 2017, Israel used its Arrow defense system against Syrian air defense.

In late March, Syrian media claimed Israel attacked a site near Aleppo and on April 13 and May 18, Syrian state media made similar claims.

Israel said last year that it had struck hundreds of targets in Syria, primarily Iranian targets related to weapons shipments. In January, former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot told The New York Times that Israel had struck thousands of targets in Syria.

But for Syria to target a routine patrol inside Israel is unusual. Syria is already embroiled in new air raids in Idlib against Syrian rebels and the US and Iran are involved in major tensions in the region.

 

Iran could hold referendum on nuclear program, Rouhani suggests 

May 27, 2019

Source: Iran could hold referendum on nuclear program, Rouhani suggests – www.israelhayom.com

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani tells state news that he proposed a referendum back in 2004 and that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei supported the idea at the time.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani implied Sunday that the Islamic Republic could hold a referendum over the country’s nuclear program.

Rouhani was quoted by the state-run IRNA news agency saying he proposed a referendum on the issue in 2004 to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who initially accepted the idea. However, Rouhani said, former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad “changed the situation and things went on another path.”

Last week semi-official Fars and Tasnim quoted an official at the Natanz nuclear facility saying that Iran had quadrupled its production of low-enriched uranium.

Earlier this month, Rouhani said Tehran would enrich uranium and stop some of its commitments under the 2015 nuclear deal if the European signatories did not live up to their parts of the deal.

Tehran’s announcement caused friction with the European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal, who all urged Iran to stick to the agreement.

 

Peace and Annexation are not Mutually Exclusive

May 27, 2019

Judith Bergman | 23/04/2019

President Trump appears to recognize that the conflict is not about specific borders, but about the Arabs’ total opposition to Israel’s existence. Israel could be on its way to a full annexation of Judea and Samaria.

Trump and Netanyahu. (Credit photo: A. Ohayon, Flash90)

Shortly before the Israeli elections, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to extend Israeli sovereignty to all Israeli settlements in Judea and Samaria: “I am going to apply Israeli sovereignty, but I don’t distinguish between settlement blocs and isolated settlements. From my perspective, each of those settlement points is Israeli. We have responsibility [for them] as the government of Israel. I don’t uproot any, and I won’t transfer them to the sovereignty of the Palestinians. I take care of them all,” he said.

Netanyahu also told Trump regarding the peace plan that “… there can’t be the removal of even one settlement, and [that Israel insists on] our continued control of all the territory to the west of the Jordan”.

Netanyahu’s pledge caused a meltdown among certain American Jewish groups, nine of whom wrote a letter to Trump, pleading with him to stop Netanyahu from fulfilling his pledge of annexation.

However, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was recently asked whether he thought that Netanyahu’s pledge of annexation would hurt Trump’s peace plan and he said that he did not think so.  “I think that the vision that we’ll lay out is going to represent a significant change from the model that’s been used,” said Pompeo. Already in late March, US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman said about the current administration’s concern for Israeli security, “How can we kick the can down the road and leave this to our successors?  … Can we leave this to an administration that may not understand the existential risk to Israel if Judea and Samaria are overcome by terrorism in the manner that befell the Gaza Strip after the IDF withdrew from this territory? Can we leave this to an administration that may not understand the need for Israel to maintain overriding security control of Judea and Samaria and a permanent defense position in the Jordan valley?” Pompeo’s indication that there is no contradiction between a potential Israeli annexation of Jewish communities beyond the green line and Trump’s peace plan represents a groundbreaking paradigm shift in US-Israeli relations. For decades, the international community, including the US, as well as the left in Israel and abroad, insisted that a Jewish presence in Judea and Samaria undermines peace. For the first time ever, a US president appears to think differently. This is a fact that could shift decades of perceptions on the topic.

“Pompeo’s remarks are the latest signal that the Trump peace plan, if it’s ever presented, will bear no resemblance to previous models of a two-state solution. Instead, the plan seems designed to perpetuate isolated areas of limited Palestinian autonomy under overall Israeli control, including annexed settlements,” said Dan Shapiro, former US ambassador to Israel and currently a fellow at Tel Aviv University’s Institute for National Security Studies.

Shapiro makes it sound as if that is a bad thing. It is not:

Most main Israeli settlement blocs are adjacent to the narrow 1949 ceasefire lines and are important components of Israel’s security. A complete Israeli withdrawal to the 1949 ceasefire lines (pre-1967 green line) in the context of a two-state solution would greatly expose Jerusalem, metropolitan Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion airport to terrorists taking advantage of the commanding heights of Judea and Samaria. Critics demand that Israel exposes itself to security threats that no other country in the world would accept.

Unlike its predecessors, the Trump administration appears to recognize that the conflict is not about specific borders, but about the Arabs’ total opposition to Israel’s existence within any boundaries. Unlike the rest of the international community, the Trump administration seems to understand that the two-state solution has failed because the Palestinian Authority (PA) is not prepared to accept Israel’s existence and shoulder the responsibilities of statehood. The two-state mantra itself has become an obstacle to peace and a political weapon to put constant pressure on Israel. A fully independent PA state would become a terrorist state threatening Israel’s security. In 2018, Netanyahu said that the PA Arabs should have all the powers to govern themselves but no power to threaten Israel. Instead of labels, Netanyahu stressed the need for content with solutions that do not undermine Israel’s security.

What many international observers deliberately ignore is that full national independence is not an automatic right for anyone, as evidenced by the experience of stateless peoples such as the Kurds, for example. The same international community that rejects the establishment of the world’s first Kurdish state hypocritically demands the establishment of a 22nd Arab state.

The PA Arabs have rejected statehood more than any other group in the world. By consistently prioritizing Israel’s destruction over its own independence, the PA has effectively disqualified itself as a candidate for full statehood. It can only be hoped that the US is only the first of many to realize this fact.

________________

Judith Bergman is a columnist and political analyst and a fellow with the Gatestone Institute.

Trump on Iran: ‘If they’d like to talk, we’d like to talk’ 

May 27, 2019

Source: Trump on Iran: ‘If they’d like to talk, we’d like to talk’ | The Times of Israel

US president tells Japan’s PM: ‘Nobody wants to see terrible things happen, especially me’; says he feels good about North Korea; Pyongyang calls Bolton a ‘defective human product’

US President Donald Trump speaks during a bilateral meeting with Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (not pictured) at Akasaka Palace in Tokyo on May 27, 2019. (Eugene Hoshiko / POOL / AFP)

US President Donald Trump speaks during a bilateral meeting with Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (not pictured) at Akasaka Palace in Tokyo on May 27, 2019. (Eugene Hoshiko / POOL / AFP)

US President Donald Trump on Monday held out the possibility of negotiations with Iran as he met with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who is reportedly weighing a trip to Tehran.

“I do believe that Iran would like to talk, and if they’d like to talk, we’d like to talk also,” Trump said.

“We’ll see what happens, but I know for a fact that the prime minister (Abe) is very close with the leadership of Iran… nobody wants to see terrible things happen, especially me.”

Earlier this week, the United States said it was deploying 1,500 additional troops to the Middle East to counter “credible threats” from Iran in a move denounced by Tehran on Saturday as “a threat to international peace.”

The escalation of the US military presence follows a decision in early May to send an aircraft carrier strike force and B-52 bombers in a show of force against what Washington’s leaders believed was an imminent Iranian plan to attack US assets.

The flight deck of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea, on May 19, 2019. (Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Garrett LaBarge/US Navy via AP)

The new deployment includes reconnaissance aircraft, fighter jets and engineers. Six hundred of the personnel belong to a Patriot missile defense battalion that had its deployment in the region extended.

Pentagon officials said the move was necessary after multiple threatening actions and several small-in-scope attacks in May by Iranian forces, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, and “proxy” forces.

Those include a rocket launched into the Green Zone in Baghdad, explosive devices that damaged four tankers in Fujairah near the entrance to the Gulf, and a Houthi drone attack against a Saudi oil installation.

Iran has denied involvement in any of the attacks.

Pentagon officials have stressed that the US does not seek war with Iran.

“We do not see these additional capabilities as encouraging hostilities. We see them as defensive in nature,” said acting Assistant Secretary of Defense Katie Wheelbarger.

“Our policy remains an economic and diplomatic effort to bring Iran back to the negotiating table to encourage a comprehensive deal that addresses the range of their destabilizing behavior in the region.”

Trump said he had a good feeling that the nuclear standoff with North Korea will be resolved.

“I may be right, I may be wrong. But I feel that we’ve come a long way. There’s been no rocket testing, there’s been no nuclear testing,” he said.

People watch a TV showing a news program reporting North Korea’s missile launch, at the Seoul Railway Station in Seoul, South Korea, May 5, 2019 (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)

North Korea has not tested long-range missiles that could hit the United States. But earlier this month, North Korea fired off a series of short-range missiles that alarmed U.S. allies in closer proximity to North Korea. National Security Adviser John Bolton said violated UN Security Council resolutions. The tests broke a pause in North Korea’s ballistic missile launches that began in late 2017.

North Korea on Monday called Bolton a “war monger” and “defective human product” after he called the tests on May 4 and May 9 a violation of UN Security Council resolutions.

US President Donald Trump, left, meets with South Korean President Moon Jae-In in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, as national security adviser John Bolton, right, watches. May 22, 2018. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

Pyongyang’s official Korean Central News Agency on Monday carried a statement by an unnamed spokesman of North Korea’s Foreign Ministry who said that Pyongyang was rightfully exercising its rights to self-defense with the launches.

The tests have been seen as a way for North Korea to pressure Washington to soften its stance on easing sanctions against it without actually causing the negotiations to collapse.

“We’ll see what happens,” Trump said in Tokyo. “There’s a good respect built — maybe a great respect built — between certainly the United States and North Korea. We will see what happens.”

 

A Swiss diplomat & Iraq’s President – go-betweens for first, US-Iranian talks – DEBKAfile

May 27, 2019

Source: A Swiss diplomat & Iraq’s President – go-betweens for first, US-Iranian talks – DEBKAfile

The two back-channels through which the Trump team sought to initiate exploratory talks with Tehran have run into a blank wall, DEBKAfile’s exclusive sources report. Interpreting this silent treatment as an Iranian ploy for time to prepare more attacks, the administration last week boosted its military deployment in the Gulf with another 1,500 troops.

Plenty of politicians are volunteering to mediate efforts to bring the US and Iran together, notably, Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi and Omani Foreign Minister Yusuf bin Alawi – who is an old hand as this. The Trump administration has not taken up any of their offers.  Instead, our intelligence sources reveal, White House advisers have turned to a senior Swiss diplomat and the Kurdish president of Iraq. Arnold Henninger, a high-ranking member of the Swiss foreign service, has long being involved in the interaction between the two governments since the Swiss embassy has represented US interests in Tehran for decades. Iraq’s president Barham Salih has good contacts in the right circles in both Washington and Tehran.

On Saturday, May 25, shortly before Salih boarded a flight fo Saudi Arabia and Turkey, he was confronted by Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif who had popped over to Baghdad. They held a long conversation.

The main catch in both channels is that no one knows how high in the Islamic regime the two brokers have reached, and on whose desks the US messages addressed to the highest echelons have landed.

The Swiss diplomat Henninger has come closest to supreme ruler Ayatollah Ali Khamenei through Ali Velayati, Khamenei’s senior adviser on international affairs. But he can’t say whether Velayati passed the Trump administration’s messages to his boss.

President Salih is known to be in contact with Zarif and talks regularly with deputy foreign minister Abbas Aragchi. Iranian officials are ambiguous about the final destination of the messages he relayed, although some admit that Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani is in the picture. Without con formation that those messages reached the all-powerful supreme leader or some authoritative affirmation, the American bid to open initial exploratory talks with Tehran is up against an immovable obstacle.

 

Herman Wouk and the Jew in the public square 

May 27, 2019

Source: Herman Wouk and the Jew in the public square – www.israelhayom.com

At a time when American Jews rose to prominence by shedding their Jewish identity, Herman Wouk was an author with different ideals.

The novelist, who died on May 17, just 10 days short of his 104 birthday, was among the most prolific authors of his era. He wrote best-selling novels like The Caine Mutiny, which won a Pulitzer Prize and was subsequently made into a hit play and movie made immortal by Humphrey Bogart’s portrayal of the doomed and mentally unstable Captain Queeg. Marjorie Morningstar has been loved by generations of American girls and women who identified with the title character. His narrative epics about World War II, The Winds of War and War and Remembrance, were read by millions and made into popular television miniseries in the 1980s that Americans watched with bated breath. Wouk continued writing popular works until the end of his long, productive life, unfazed by the disdain of literary critics and the contempt of cultural elites who put him down for championing the values of middle-class morality, faith and patriotism they deplored.

There is much to say about Wouk the author. But what was just as remarkable, especially in the context of his time, was Wouk the very publicly observant Jew.

Born in the Bronx in 1915 to Russian Jewish immigrant parents and a graduate of Columbia University, Wouk wrote jokes for radio comedian Fred Allen, though left the entertainment world to serve as an officer in the U.S. Navy during World War II. His time fighting in the Pacific not only served as the basis for some of his writing, but also profoundly influenced his outlook on life.

Literary critics may have preferred Jewish writers like Norman Mailer and Philip Roth, who regarded the lifestyle most Americans aspired to as empty and hypocritical. Yet Wouk’s innate conservatism expressed the ethos of postwar America, and the ambitions of the generation of upward-striving second-generation Americans in particular.

In stark contrast to other Jewish writers and prominent American Jews was the way Wouk treated Judaism and Jewish identity.

While Jews were prominent figures in American popular culture throughout the first half of the 20th century, this was due in large measure to their shedding of their Jewish identity or at least keeping it under wraps. The same was true of films, plays and books written for popular audiences. To the extent that Jewish religious observance or traditions were presented to the public, it was shown as exoticism rather than normal.

But Wouk had very different ideals.

In his books, Jews weren’t stereotypes or merely Americans with Jewish surnames and backgrounds, but living, breathing Jews who were engaged in one way or another with their traditions and faith.

His character Barney Greenglass, the navy attorney in The Caine Mutiny, isn’t afraid to speak about being Jewish or to reference the threat of the Holocaust. In Marjorie Morningstar, the heroine’s family is authentically Jewish, celebrating Passover and a child’s bar mitzvah – something that helped introduce Jewish life to the vast mainstream non-Jewish audience that read Wouk’s books. Marjorie’s story arc, in which she drops her Jewish-sounding name and pursues fame as an actress, as well as rejecting the strict sexual mores of her family only to ultimately settle happily for life as a typical Jewish suburban wife and mother, may not sit well with some readers today. But it exemplified faith in the value of tradition, as well as middle-class morality.

But Wouk was more than just a Jewish author unafraid to write about Jews and Judaism. He was also an Orthodox Jew who, even while immersed in the creative process, refused to compromise on the observance of Shabbat and kashrut.

That was remarkable in an era when, if they were celebrities like Wouk, Jews simply didn’t behave that way in public. When he appeared on the cover of Time magazine in 1955, the article noted his Jewish observance as something of a curiosity: “He is a devout Orthodox Jew who had achieved worldly success in worldly-wise Manhattan while adhering to dietary prohibitions and traditional rituals which many of his fellow Jews find embarrassing.”

But Wouk wasn’t merely unashamed to be a practicing Jew. He also sought to educate the public about Judaism. In 1959, he published This Is My God, a primer on Judaism that opened up the world of Jewish study and faith to a vast audience. It was more than a defense of traditional Jewish faith; it presented the religion as an attractive, normative lifestyle, rather than something restricted to those presumed to be living in an unenlightened past. His books also gave us insight into his own life, in which Torah study, observance, celebration of Jewish identity and support of Israel remained a constant throughout his nearly 104 years.

Wouk would go on writing best-selling books with a special emphasis on historical fiction. Those two-volume epics – Winds of War and War and Remembrance – were especially influential in teaching many about the Holocaust.

Those books sparked comparisons to Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace from some of his admirers. Suffice it to say that neither his prose nor his historical insights justified that analogy, but Wouk thought of himself as a storyteller, not a literary immortal. At his best, his straightforward narrative style remains both entertaining and educational. Our world would be much poorer without his vast body of work.

As an American and a veteran, Herman Wouk was a sterling example of why we call the men and women who lived in his era and had similar experiences “the greatest generation.” But he was also a role model who showed us that it was possible to be a faithful Jew in the American public square. May his memory be a blessing.

This article is reprinted with permission from JNS.org.