Archive for May 2, 2018

Abbas says he rejected offer from Egypt’s Mursi to settle Palestinians in Sinai

May 2, 2018

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said on Monday that he had rejected an offer by former Egyptian President Mohammed Mursi to get a part of Sinai to settle the Palestinians there.

“When the Brotherhood ruled during Mursi’s presidential term, we were offered a part of Sinai but we turned down the offer,” he said while addressing the Palestinian National Council in Ramallah.

He added that this was an Israeli project dubbed “Giora Eiland” and aims to completely put an end to the Palestinian cause.

Abbas voiced his rejection to Mursi and told him that the Palestinians will not accept such proposals as they will not leave their land and will not live on someone else’s land.

The Palestinian president had revealed details of this proposal four years ago while meeting with reporters in Egypt as he said that he had refused an Israeli offer to take 1,000 kilometers of Sinai during Mursi’s era.

He added that back then, Hamas and Israel were discussing taking 1000 km from Sinai to expand Gaza but he refused the plan saying: “We will not even take one centimeter from Egypt’s land.”

According to Abbas, Mursi reprimanded him for not accepting the offer.

Military expert Major-General Hussam Soueilam told Al Arabiya.net that the “Giora Eiland document” is named after Giora Eiland, a reserve commander who works at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, and it was proposed as the “best solution” for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

“Eiland’s project stipulated that resolving the Palestinian cause is not only Israel’s responsibility but the responsibility of 22 other Arab states as Egypt and Jordan in particular must positively and effectively formulate a regional and multilateral solution,” he said.

According to the Israeli project, the Palestinians would be granted 720 km2 of North Sinai that extends from Rafah in the west until Arish borders and from west Kerem Shalom border crossing until the south alongside the Egyptian-Israeli borders.

Soueilam added that according to this project, Gaza’s area will be three times more than its current area which is only 365 km2. He noted that the Palestinians will have to give up 12% of the West Bank’s area to be included within Israeli territories and that Egypt will be compensated with an equal area from Israeli lands southwest of Negev.

Last Update: Wednesday, 2 May 2018 KSA 15:04 – GMT 12:04

UK, Germany, France allow for possibility of new nuclear deal with Iran

May 2, 2018

April 29, 18:18

The three leaders “discussed the importance of the Iran nuclear deal as the best way of neutralizing the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran”

http://tass.com/world/1002501

British Prime Minister Theresa May

© AP Photo/Geert Vanden Wijngaert

LONDON, April 29. /TASS/. Leaders of the United Kingdom, Germany and France have allowed for the possibility of a new deal with Iran over the elements of its nuclear program that the current deal failed to cover, says a press release issued by British Prime Minister Theresa May’s Office on Sunday.

On Saturday and Sunday, May had phone talks with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron.

“Acknowledging the importance of retaining the JCPoA, they committed to continue working closely together and with the US on how to tackle the range of challenges that Iran poses – including those issues that a new deal might cover,” the press release says.

The three leaders “discussed the importance of the Iran nuclear deal (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) as the best way of neutralizing the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran, agreeing that our priority as an international community remained preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon,” it reads.

“They agreed that there were important elements that the deal does not cover, but which we need to address – including ballistic missiles, what happens when the deal expires, and Iran’s destabilizing regional activity,” a Downing Street spokesperson said.

In July 2015, Iran, the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (Russia, Britain, China, the United States and France) and Germany agreed on a settlement of Tehran’s nuclear problem. Under the JCPoA they worked out the UN, US and EU sanctions were to be lifted. Its implementation began in January 2016. Washington lifted the restrictions.

US President Donald Trump has described the agreement with Iran as a “bad deal.” He argued that it did not eliminate the possibility Iran might make nuclear weapons, but merely postponed the moment. On January 12, Trump said the United States would quit the deal if certain amendments agreed on with the European countries were not made to it. At the end of April a US administration spokesman said the United States, France, Germany and Britain had achieved progress at negotiations on amendments to the agreement on Iran’s nuclear program, but a final solution had not been identified yet.

 

Palestinians: The Real Gaza Blockade

May 2, 2018

US troops to remain in South Korea even if peace treaty signed with North – Moon

May 2, 2018

Published time: 2 May, 2018 13:24

https://www.rt.com/news/425648-us-troops-korea-stay-moon/

A US army soldier stands guard in front of a F-22 stealth fighter jet at Osan Air Base in Pyeongtaek, South Korea. © Kim Hong-Ji / Reuters

South Korean President Moon Jae-in said on Wednesday that US troops will remain on the peninsula even if a peace agreement with the North is reached, saying their presence has “nothing to do with signing peace treaties.”

“US troops stationed in South Korea are an issue regarding the alliance between South Korea and the United States. It has nothing to do with signing peace treaties,” Moon’s spokesperson Kim Eui-kyeom said at a press conference.

The statement came in response to a Foreign Affairs magazine article written by presidential adviser, Moon Cung-in, in which he stated that it would be “difficult to justify [US forces] continuing presence in South Korea,” if peace is concluded with the North. The spokesperson warned the adviser “not to cause any more confusion” with such comments.

READ MORE: Trump considers Peace House on North-South Korea border for Kim Jong-un meeting

The discussion regarding US troops in Korea follows Friday’s historic meeting between Moon and North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, which resulted in the two signing an agreement in favor of the Korean peninsula’s “complete denuclearization.” The summit marked the first time leaders of the divided nation have met in 11 years, and the first time a North Korean leader has entered the South since 1953.

North Korea previously signaled its readiness to denuclearize at a meeting between Kim and Chinese President Xi Jinping last month, noting that it would require a “security guarantee,” according to a report by the Japanese newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun. What the guarantee implied remains unclear, as North Korea reportedly dropped its long-held demand for US troop withdrawal, at least according to Moon’s public statement in late April.

Read more

A poster with the image of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un during an anti-North Korea rally in central Seoul, South Korea, February 11, 2016. © Kim Hong-Ji

The US has already expressed its intention to make North Korea take “irreversible” steps towards denuclearization, without guaranteeing any concession in relation to its military presence.

CIA Director and newly appointed US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo identified the Trump administration’s “objective” with regard to North Korea as “complete, verifiable, irreversible denuclearization” in an ABC News interview.

In a separate interview with Fox News, US National Security Advisor John Bolton stated that the 2003 agreement to eliminate Libya’s weapons of mass destruction program could serve as a model for the North Korea negotiations.

“We have very much in mind the Libya model from 2003, 2004. There are obviously differences. The Libyan program was much smaller, but that was basically the agreement that we made,” Bolton said.

Former Libyan president Muammar Gaddafi agreed to dismantle the country’s nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of imposed Western sanctions. In 2011, he was killed by a NATO-led bombing of the country, which led to a civil war and Islamist terrorism groups rising in the region.

At the historic Korean summit, Kim and Moon agreed to establish a direct telephone line between their executive offices, through which they will “hold frequent and candid discussions on issues vital to the nation,” according to the declaration they signed. President Moon is also set to visit Pyongyang this fall, months after US President Donald Trump’s anticipated meeting with Kim in the coming weeks.

Tehran terrified, ex-Pentagon official says 

May 2, 2018

Source: Tehran terrified, ex-Pentagon official says – Middle East – Jerusalem Post

The Iranian regime is “humiliated” after a daring Mossad operation seized scores of secret documents, the former Pentagon official said.

BY YONAH JEREMY BOB
 MAY 2, 2018 04:20Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
 Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. (photo credit: AFP PHOTO / HO / KHAMENEI.IR)

The Iranian regime is “quaking in its boots,” after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu revealed secret nuclear-program documents appropriated by the Mossad, an ex-Pentagon Iran expert told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday.

Harold Rhode spent 28 years at the Pentagon and studied in Iran before the 1979 revolution there. The fluent Farsi speaker, who is now associated with the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, said his view stems from a wave of recent Iranian infighting.

He said when things are not going well in Iran, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps officials and rival ayatollahs start attacking each other in a public blame game that expresses how exposed and vulnerable they feel their rule has become.

Rhode named senior Ayatollah Abdollah Javadi-Amoli from northern Iran who has been lashing out at rivals, saying their corruption was bringing down the regime.

Play Video

Israel claims proof Iran “lied” about past nuclear program, April 30, 2018 (Reuters

Israel “humiliated the Iranian government by capturing all of this material,” Rhode said, and many Iranians were laughing at the Islamic regime on social media.

While the global media stopped covering protests against the regime months ago, he noted, the protests are still churning.

The former Pentagon official said that when he asked Iranian friends for a list of where the protests were happening, they said protests were so widespread it would be easier to make a shorter list of cities where they were not happening.

He also said the audacious Mossad raid, “proves what they think of Jews – that they are the smartest people on earth and can do anything.”

Rhode added a personal anecdote from when he lived in Iran decades ago. When asked about the Jews’ ability, he joked to some Iranian friends: “There was a Jewish technology of tiny little zippers between our foreheads and hairlines to send messages to conspiracy central where the… ‘Elders of Zion’ collected everything. They believed this was how things really worked.”

Last week, the body that likely was that of former Iranian ruler Reza Shah Pahlavi – which had been hidden by the regime since the revolution – was discovered. That, he noted, has led many Iranians, who often think superstitiously, to question whether the discovery is an omen indicating the revolution leading to the Islamic Republic was a mistake.

Rhode said the average Iranian “would like nothing more than to wake up and have this nightmare regime over with and again proudly be accepted as members of the international community.”

In that light, he said, it is now “the time to reassure the Iranian people that we stand with them against their brutal rulers,” and reassure the Iranian people that “after their terrorist regime is overthrown, we will gladly welcome them back into the community of nations.”

Iran ordered to pay billions to families of victims of 9/11 terror attacks

May 2, 2018

The ruling will probably turn out to be largely symbolic, as Iran is very unlikely to ever pay the damages.

By Juliane Helmhold May 2, 2018 12:13 Jerusalem Post

Source Link: Iran ordered to pay billions to families of victims of 9/11 terror attacks

{Obama the Bastard could have settled some of these claims with all the cash he sent to the Mullahs, but I guess doing the right thing was just not part of his forte. – LS}

By court order, Iran is to pay billions of dollars to the families of the September 11 terror attacks, The Hill reported on Tuesday evening.

US District Judge George Daniels ruled that the Islamic Republic and other institutions must pay $12.5 million per spouse, $8.5 million per parent, $8.5 million per child and $4.25 million per sibling killed in the incident, according to the report.

The lawsuit was first filed in 2004 and was joined by families of the over 1,000 victims of the attack. It accused Iran, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran for aiding the 2001 hijackers although the 9/11 Commission never found direct evidence for Iran’s involvement.

The lawsuit was only able to proceed in 2016, when Congress passed the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, permitting the families of the victims to sue state actors for the terror attacks. Then-President Barack Obama had vetoed the law, arguing it could set a dangerous precedent but Congress overrode that veto.

According to the report, the ruling will probably turn out to be largely symbolic, as Iran is very unlikely to ever pay the damages, which in total amount to 6 billion dollars. There would be no feasible way to force the Islamic Republic, which never even responded to the lawsuit, to make the payment.

However, the lawsuit sets a significant precedent which could be used to hold Saudi Arabia responsible for the 9/11 attacks. The Saudi government has previously denied providing aid to the hijackers, many of whom were Saudi nationals, and last month Riyadh filed a bid to toss the lawsuit. This bid, however, was rejected by Judge Daniels, leading to the successful ruling against Iran.

Netanyahu’s speech reawakens Iranian protests against their regime 

May 2, 2018

Source: Netanyahu’s speech reawakens Iranian protests against their regime – Middle East – Jerusalem Post

The Islamic Republic took us hostage. You have to differentiate between Iran, which has a history of 3,000 years, and the Islamic Republic, which is 39 years old.”

BY OZ ROSENBERG/MAARIV
 MAY 2, 2018 16:12
Thousands of people rally in support of Iranian anti-government protests in Los Angeles, California

  Thousands of people rally in support of Iranian anti-government protests in Los Angeles, California US January 7, 2018. (photo credit: MONICA ALMEIDA/REUTERS)

“The speech by Netanyahu reawakened something in the Iranian people that greatly disturbs them,” Dr. Thamar Eilam Gindin, an expert on Iran from the Shalem Academic Center and the Ezri Center said in her podcast “Enriched Uranium” on Wednesday.

Yet, however dramatic and sensitive the information Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented on Monday regarding Iran’s intentions to develop nuclear technology were, what was disturbing to the Iranians was not at all related to the content of his remarks.

“I saw a large number of people who asked not to call Iran the Islamic Republic,” said Eilam Gindin. “There were many calls from people who said: ‘They [the Islamic Republic of Iran] do not represent the Iranian people, they took us hostage. You have to differentiate between Iran, which has a history of 3,000 years, and the Islamic Republic, which is 39 years old.”

In a broader light, according to Dr. Eilam Gindin, these reactions reflect a mood currently prevailing in the streets of Iran in relation to the regime and the authorities in the republic, the United States and Israel and Netanyahu himself.

“At first the reactions were a bit hysterical,” she continued. “People in Iran feel insecure, their currency is weak and the economy is shaky. There are many who oppose the regime. Netanyahu’s speech, claiming that Israel caught their regime in a breach of agreements, put some pressure on them.

They also very much want their regime to fall. There are many keyboard warriors but when it comes to taking to the streets, they are scared. Recently the hashtag “We’re done!” was used a lot and it returned yesterday in the wake of Netanyahu’s speech.

On Monday, Prime Minister Netanyahu presented what he described as the reveal of a huge amount of intelligence material obtained by the Mossad proving that Iran lied to the superpowers while they were signing the 2015 nuclear agreement which lifted sanctions on the country.

Among other things, Netanyahu presented hundreds of binders containing copies of the material obtained by Israeli intelligence. “Here’s what we have in the files: incriminating documents, incriminating presentations, incriminating plans, pictures, clips and more,” Netanyahu said.

“We shared this information with the United States and shared it with the International Atomic Energy Agency,” the prime minister added. “We have known for years that Iran had a secret nuclear program – the ‘Amad’ project.”

Netanyahu’s speech was made in light of the United States threatening to withdraw from the nuclear agreement it signed in 2015, unless it is amended until May 12.

The disintegration of American Jewry 

May 2, 2018

Source: The disintegration of American Jewry – Israel Hayom

Isi Liebler

American Jewry, apart from the Orthodox and a minority of the committed secular, is demographically imploding.

Paradoxically, this is happening while American support for Israel is at an all-time high and traditional anti-Semitism at a record low. Non-Orthodox Jewish education is catastrophic. Intermarriage levels have reached 70%.

Although right-wing anti-Semitism makes headlines, the real threat emanates from the far Left and Muslim extremists.

In the past, liberal political forces were Israel’s strongest supporters and the penchant of American Jews for liberalism was justified.

However, over the past two decades, the far Left has become viciously anti-Israeli, even supporting terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.

This trend reached a peak under President Barack Obama, who made overtures to Iran and treated Israel politically as a rogue state. Not a single mainstream Jewish leader had the courage to protest Obama’s anti–Israel bias and, aside from African-Americans, Jews remained his greatest supporters.

When Donald Trump was elected president, hatred of him from the bulk of the Jewish leadership reached hysterical levels.

Many Jewish leaders falsely accused Trump of fascism and even anti-Semitism, despite his Jewish friends and family members and his outstanding support for Israel.

The Anti-Defamation League, headed by Jonathan Greenblatt, behaved like an extension of the anti-Trump opposition. The ADL frequently ignored or dismissed much of the left-wing anti-Semitism and soft-pedaled its criticism of Black Lives Matter, an organization that accused Israel of ethnic cleansing.

The Reform movement’s leader, Rabbi Rick Jacobs, behaved similarly, usually with the support of Conservative Jewish leaders.

In this environment, the anti-Israeli-government group J Street was absurdly portrayed as moderate and a legitimate vehicle to soften the more radical Jewish groups openly seeking the demise of Israel.

By remaining silent and appealing for tolerance toward anti-Israel groups like Jewish Voice for Peace, the Jewish establishment created a defeatist climate, paving the way for the current communal chaos.

This impacted large numbers of Jews, especially the young who had virtually no Jewish education and for whom Israel had already become marginal.

In turn, this strengthened the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement and created an atmosphere where it was considered chic for unaffiliated Jews to publicly condemn Israel.

Twenty years ago, it would have been inconceivable for anyone other than delusional Jewish fringe groups to attack Israel. Today, it requires courage to stand up against these radical anti-Israeli Jews.

These self-hating Jewish deviants have combined with Muslim extremists and the far Left to intimidate those Jews committed to Israel. They are at the forefront of the BDS movement, deny Israeli spokespeople the right to speak, and support the depiction of Israel as an “apartheid state.” The extent of the madness is reflected in groups of Jewish radicals publicly reciting Kaddish, the mourner’s prayer, for Palestinians killed by Israelis defending their borders.

Sadly, many Jewish leaders urge tolerance toward groups hostile to Israel and, rather than confronting them, entreat them to dialogue. Regrettably, many Hillel groups provide venues for such dialogue.

Whereas in the past, Jewish support for Israel was almost a given, today many liberal Jews – especially their leaders – at best feel awkward supporting Israel. Wishing to conform to their self-image as “enlightened,” many feel comfortable publicly condemning the Israeli government.

The current, almost unprecedented, unity of the Israeli people transcends politics over issues such as war and peace and defensive responses to terrorism, including the efforts by Hamas to breach Israel’s boundaries. Despite this, many liberal American Jews feel the need to condemn Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his democratically elected government. Often, they go further, even castigating the Israel Defense Forces for allegedly responding disproportionately to terrorists.

It is in this context that actress Natalie Portman’s outburst, a symptom of the current climate, was a public relations gift to Israel’s enemies despite her subsequent mealy-mouthed utterances. She would never have contemplated behaving in such a manner a few years ago, before the atmosphere had become so poisoned that criticism of Israel by Jews barely raises eyebrows.

Those committed to Israel must stand up and be counted. They should set aside the absurdity of promoting the “big tent” and seeking to engage in dialogue with Jews opposed to Israel’s right to defend itself.

They should publicly condemn and demand the resignation of leaders who criticize Israel’s security policies, which a broad Israeli consensus supports. They should call on their leaders to castigate those among them who denigrate Israel.

They should expel from their ranks those who support, defend, ally themselves with or tolerate BDS or those seeking Israel’s destruction.

Jews who ally themselves with Islamic extremists or the anti-Semitic far Left are equivalent to Jews who would have supported the Nazis had Hitler not turned on them. They should be rejected from Jewish gatherings or synagogues. They are equivalent to the “mosers” of the Middle Ages, who betrayed their communities and should be treated accordingly.

Until there are Jewish leaders who are fully committed to supporting Israel during these critical times, the ongoing disintegration of the bulk of the non-Orthodox American Jewish community will proceed unimpeded.

Isi Leibler’s website can be viewed at http://www.wordfromjerusalem.com. Email: ileibler@leibler.com.

As US deadline looms, PM says Israel not seeking war with Iran

May 2, 2018

Source: As US deadline looms, PM says Israel not seeking war with Iran – Israel Hayom

( Could have fooled me… – JW )

Just a fragment of Iran’s Atomic Archives released. Trump awaits more for his May 12 decision and Jerusalem visit 

May 2, 2018

Source: Just a fragment of Iran’s Atomic Archives released. Trump awaits more for his May 12 decision and Jerusalem visit – DEBKAfile

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu disclosed just a fraction of the purloined Iranian Atomic Archive in his presentation on Tuesday. More than 60pc of the 100,000 files are still unread, DEBKAfile’s intelligence sources reveal. By May 2, Farsi translators and nuclear experts in Israel were will working on the trove. The decision for Israel to go public on the small portion available was taken in Washington by President Donald Trump. Netanyahu asked US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, when they met in Tel Aviv on April 29, whether to go with the material processed thus far or wait for a more opportune moment when more content would be accessible. Pompeo put in a call to the White House and heard that the president preferred Israel to roll out everything it had thus far without delay. Netanyahu summoned the security cabinet into urgent session the next day to inform them about the bombshell he was about to drop in a televised press conference at prime time that evening.

Trump has marginalized Europe on his intentions regarding the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran on May 12,  in the absence of the “fixes” he demanded for an affirmative decision. Before deciding on whether to approve another sanctions waiver – and so determine whether the US stays in or quits the deal – Trump wants to see what is contained in the still unplumbed materials of the Atomic Archive. They may hold stronger evidence of Iran’s contravention of the accord than the lone violation of illicitly preserving the diagrams and charts of Project Amad for developing a nuclear weapon. If more compelling evidence of Iran’s post-2015 transgressions come to light, it will be passed immediately to the White House for Trump and his advisers for a final determination of the May 12 quandary.

Hanging on the revelations that the stolen nuclear documents may yet hold is another US presidential decision regarding his attendance at the dedication of the US embassy in Jerusalem on May 14. Our sources reveal that Trump has decided that if he clamps sanctions down on Iran two days earlier, he will not come to Jerusalem. But should he decide to hold off on sanctions to a later date, he will pop over to the Israeli capital for a few house, attend the embassy inauguration and fly straight back on the same day.
Our intelligence sources report additionally that most of the information published in Israeli outlets about how the Iranian archive reached the Mossad and was smuggled out to Israel is incorrect.