Archive for March 2016

Op-Ed: Why Trump and only Trump can beat Hillary

March 10, 2016

Op-Ed: Why Trump and only Trump can beat Hillary, Israel National News, Jack Engelhard, March 10, 2016

The crux of it is that Hillary Clinton is the most famous woman in America. To beat her in the general election you will need someone equally famous.

Does the name Kasich come to mind? Rubio? Cruz?

Americans don’t know these people. They’re good guys, as good as anyone, I suppose, but they are strangers and have no shot.

You and me – we watch Fox News, occasionally CNN and MSNBC for the laughs, but our neighbors are watching “Dancing with the Stars.”

So it’s Trump and only Trump and only Trump is as well-known as Hillary the crook.

It should not be that way, I know. It should be about issues and sometimes it is, but mostly it isn’t. It’s about fame.

Americans – we gravitate to fame. Maybe it’s the same all over, but in this country it’s like King Solomon said; a good name is more precious than silver and gold.

Don’t look to me for an endorsement. So this is not a pitch to Vote Trump. This is a pitch to vote for anybody except Hillary.

Anybody will do so long as that yenta doesn’t get it in. Imagine getting up in the morning to that scold! Four years of that? Eight years?

Republicans who say they are staying home if Trump gets the nomination, your peeve, your snit may well come crashing upon all our heads.

How stupid! How selfish!

So happens that I do like Trump; liked him from the start. He’s too brash, too unscripted? That’s what I like. No teleprompter for him.

We’ve already got the perfect politician sitting in the White House – how’s that working out?

Ditto Hillary the opportunist. She’ll say anything to make a sale. Even people who vote for her do not like her. Nobody likes her. Bill doesn’t like her and what a disgrace to find a former President of the United States, instead of sitting grandly retired, there he is, from coast to coast, reduced to pimping for votes.

No wonder. She needs all the help she can get, so in this age where everybody gets a gold star, she calls it a triumph even when she loses.

The other day she lost Michigan to Bernie Sanders, the Communist Senator from Vermont. Did she give a concession speech?

No, she gave a victory speech.

The Republicans do likewise. Kasich, Cruz and Rubio keep losing and keep explaining how it is they really won.

They give victory speeches for coming in second, third and fourth.

No guys, you lost. Trump won.

To keep him going and to save us from Hillary or any Democrat in the next White House – think Hollywood.

When the studios spend millions to bring out a picture they need a big name, a star, to “open.”

To “open” means to attract moviegoers with a familiar name, like say Tom Hanks, and thus guarantee automatic box office.

Yes, Tom Hanks can open for the movies.

Donald Trump and only Donald Trump can open for the White House.

Terrorist Groups Intensify Targeting of Children for Jihad

March 10, 2016

Terrorist Groups Intensify Targeting of Children for Jihad, Investigative Project on Terrorism, Abha Shankar, March 10, 2016

Children 1

Children have become a key target group for recruitment by terrorist groups who are increasingly turning to social media to showcase their successful efforts in indoctrinating them for jihad. In January, for example, Wilayat Khorasan (or “Khorasan Province”), the Islamic State (ISIS)’s branch in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region, released a propaganda video titled, “Cubs of the Caliphate Camp,” that showed young boys undergoing training for jihad.

Screenshots from the video showed young boys dressed in camouflage learning how to fire Kalashnikov assault rifles. The training center, likely located in Afghanistan’s eastern province of Nangarhar, is reported to be the fourth such Islamic State training facility in the region.

Similar camps are openly flourishing in Syria and Iraq, where children are being actively recruited by ISIS to serve as the next generation of fighters for the terrorist group. A new report published in the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point’s CTC Sentinel claims that in the past year, at least 89 male child soldiers were eulogized as “martyrs” on Twitter as well as the Islamic State’s official Telegram channel. The child soldiers hailed from countries as varied as Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Libya, and Nigeria, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Libya, the United Kingdom, France, and Australia.

Four percent of the child soldiers died conducting suicide missions and another 18 percent were inghimasis (meaning “to plunge” in Arabic) – that meant that the children fought alongside adults to attack enemy positions with light automatic weapons and subsequently killed themselves by detonating suicide vests, the report said.

The published photographs of the child martyrs showed a consistent “theme of happiness at the prospect of martyrdom.” Children could be seen “standing in orchards and meadows, scenery presumably chosen to echo the paradise to which they thought they were destined.”

Another important conclusion of the report was that, unlike other conflicts where child soldiers are a “strategy of last resort” and serve to replace adults in battle, ISIS’ child soldiers “are fighting alongside, rather than in lieu of, adult males.”

Children 2

Recruiting children not only ensures a next generation of fighters for a terrorist group but it’s also easier brainwashing young impressionable minds. “It’s been done for the same reasons that Hitler had the Hitler Youth,” Charlie Winter of the Quillam Foundation, a counter-terrorism think tank based in London, told NBC News.

“There’s no term better suited to it than brainwashing,” Winters added. “These children won’t have any point of reference other than jihadism so the ideology will be a lot more firm in their heads and lot more difficult to dislodge.”

In October, London-based Channel 4 News published a video that showcased examples of ISIS “nurturing a new generation for the Caliphate to fight infidels.”Children undergo rigorous physical training and pledge allegiance to the terrorist group by declaring: “I must listen and obey even if I have to die.”

A former instructor who escaped one such camp after being “disillusioned by the scale of violence” perpetrated by ISIS confessed that the terrorist group convinces children into jihad by telling them that “It’s written in the Quran you have to fight jihad” and that “all of us will die martyrs and reach heaven, all of us.”

Children who refuse to fight jihad on behalf of ISIS not only risk death, but also of torture and other punishment. In one horrifying example, ISIS chopped off a 14-year-old’s hand and foot with a butcher’s knife as a warning to other children not to resist taking up arms in support of the group. ISIS told the gathered children and teenagers, “This man is an infidel so we will cut off his hand and foot,” and “All those who fight against us will have their hands and feet cut off.”

Children also are encouraged to spy on their parents who, in turn, risk death if they object to their kids joining the terrorist group.

In July, ISIS released a video showing a young boy beheading a soldier serving in the Syrian Army under the watch of a senior militant near the ancient city of Palmyra. Earlier last year, ISIS released a video showing a boy who appeared to be younger than 15-years-old behead two alleged Russian spies. In another example, Khaled Sharrouf, who left Australia to join Islamic State fighters in Syria, posted a photo of his young son holding up a decapitated head of a man.

Groups such as ISIS have “aggressively targeted children for recruitment, providing free lectures and schooling that included weapons and other military training,” a Human Rights Watch report said.

This was confirmed by a United Nations report that asserted that children as young as 12 or 13 are being recruited by ISIS to undergo military training in Mosul, Iraq. Boys who had been forcibly recruited by the Islamic State but managed to escape confessedto their families that they had been “forced to form the front line to shield” fighters as well as coerced to donate blood for injured fighters. ISIS also uses children for propaganda purposes, and the report cited an example of militants forcing two sick children at a cancer hospital in Mosul to pose for pictures holding the Islamic State flag that were subsequently posted on the Internet.

Children 3

The Islamic State also has been using the Internet to ensnare young girls into jihad. Online chat rooms routinely advisegirls “on how to discretely disobey their parents and sneak away” to the Islamic State. When girls express concern at the financial cost of taking the trip, they’re told to “get in touch privately and we will help you out.” The terrorist group has also set up a “marriage bureau” in Aleppo province of northern Syria for “single women and widows who would like to marry ISIS fighters.”

Recruiting children for jihad is not restricted to just the Islamic State. A report on Jafrianews.com claims the Taliban has enlisted hundreds of children to wage jihad in Afghanistan and Pakistan since 2006. Several juvenile recruits join the Taliban willingly to avenge the killing of family members. The new volunteers then go through a “systematic motivation process” where “they are made to watch video films, showing physical torture and killing of Muslims [sic] women and children in Kashmir, Afghanistan, Chechnya and Somalia by what they call infidels,” the report said.

In a May feature story on child suicide bombers, the CBS News program 60 Minutesnoted that children as young as 7 are being recruited as suicide bombers in Afghanistan and Pakistan. “Children accept what you say after you talk to them just a couple of times,” a Taliban commander said. “They can be used in rickshaw, bicycle or motorcycle attacks.”

Training takes four to seven months, he added, and recruits were picked up for different tasks based on their abilities, including for the job of a suicide bomber.

Documents from the Joint Intelligence Group at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay included statements from detainees that detailed methods employed by the Taliban to indoctrinate children. “Taliban used hard-line interpretation of the Quran as a recruitment tool” and “[j]uveniles are more willing to martyr themselves due to their lack of reasoning on taking innocent lives,” the documents show.

In the PBS documentary Children of the Taliban, journalist Sharmeen Obaid Chinoyinterviewed Taliban commander Qari Hussain, who bragged recruiting children as young as five. “Children are tools to achieve God’s will. And whatever comes your way, you sacrifice it,” Hussain said.

Child recruitment also is widespread among terrorist groups operating in Africa. In Mali, jihadists recruit poor children from rural areas who have been sent to distant Islamic schools by their families, who cannot afford to pay for their school fees or to feed them. Sometimes the children volunteer to join the terrorist group for money or following indoctrination in religious schools.

In Nigeria, Boko Haram has been using girls between the ages of 11 and 15 as female suicide bombers to spread terror in the region. “It’s easier for women and girls to slip into crowds where they can carry out mass atrocities than for men,” Mausi Segun, a Nigerian researcher with Human Rights Watch in the capital city of Abuja, explained. “In northern Nigeria, the dressing of the woman gives her the ability to move about with all kinds of things undetected. She wears a long, voluminous head veil that reaches, sometimes, to the ankles – and also because security forces are not prone to searching women.”

Children 4

The Palestinian terrorist group Hamas has beenimparting military training to children in the Gaza Strip to fight against Israel through summer camps specifically set up for the purpose for several years. In March 2015, the Israel-based Center for Near East Policy Research (CNEPR)released a documentary, “Children’s Army of Hamas,” that shows extensive training and indoctrination footage from Hamas summer camps, including children engaging in target practice with combat rifles, rockets, and anti-aircraft equipment. Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh can be heard at the documentary’s conclusion saying: “Jews, beware! This generation is not afraid to confront you in your centers. This is the generation of the stones! This is the generation of the missiles! This is the generation of the tunnels! This is the generation of the suicide bombers!”

Hamas has used its media arm, Al-Aqsa TV, to indoctrinate Palestinian children and glorify jihad for years. In 2007, the television show, “Tomorrow’s Pioneers” featured a Mickey Mouse knockoff named Farfour. For several weeks, Farfour and his child co-host urged children to violently resist Israel while touting the supremacy of Islam. After Farfour refused to succumb to pressure from “authorities” to give up his land, his co-host Saraa informed viewers that he had been “martyred at the hands of the criminals, the murderers, the murderers of innocent children….”

Dangerous illusions about Iran

March 10, 2016

Dangerous illusions about Iran, Israel Hayom, Elliott Abrams, March 10, 2016

Last year’s Iran nuclear agreement was sold with several powerful arguments, and among the most important were these: that the agreement would strengthen Iranian “moderates” and thus Iran’s external conduct, and that it would allow us unparalleled insight into Iran’s nuclear program.

Both are now proving to be untrue, but the handling of the two differs. The “moderation” argument is being proved wrong but the evidence is simply being denied. The “knowledge” argument is being proved wrong but the fact is being met with silence. Let’s review the bidding.

The idea that the nuclear agreement was a reward for Iran’s “moderates” and would strengthen them is a key tenet of the defense of the agreement. If Iran remains the bellicose and repressive theocracy of today when the agreement ends and Iran is free to build nukes without limits, we have entered a dangerous bargain. It is critical that Iran change, so defenders of the agreement adduce evidence that it has. And the new evidence is Iran’s recent elections. Those elections were a great victory for “moderates” and hard-liners, it is said, and they help to prove that the nuclear deal was wise.

The problem here is that those elections were anything but a victory for Iran’s reformers. As Mehdi Khalaji wrote about the Assembly of Experts election, “If one understands ‘reformist’ as a political figure who emerged during the reform movement of the late 1990s and is associated with the parties and groups created at that time, then neither the candidates on the ‘reformist’ list nor the winners of Tehran’s sixteen assembly seats can credibly be called by that name.” To take one of the examples Khalaji cites, Mahmoud Alavi ran on what has been called a reformist ticket but he “is the current intelligence minister, and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei appointed him as head of the military’s Ideological-Political Organization from 2000 to 2009.” Khalaji concludes that “no new prominent reformists won seats, and the proportion of hardliners remained the same.”

Ray Takeyh and Reuel Gerecht draw a stark conclusion: This year’s elections “spelled the end of Iran’s once-vivacious reform movement” which has simply been crushed by the regime. “The electoral cycle began with the usual mass disqualification of reformers and independent-minded politicians,” they remind us. I’d cite another fact: that reformers of past election years, presidential candidates Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karoubi, have remained under house arrest for five years now, during the entire Rouhani presidency, demonstrating the true fate of reformers of even a mild variety.

What’s the point of the “reformist” charade? As Takeyh and Gerecht note, “Foreigners don’t have to confess that they are investing in an increasingly conservative and increasingly strong theocracy; rather, they are aiding ‘moderates’ at the expense of hardliners.” But this charade has in fact worked well, producing headline after headline in the Western media about “reformist” victories. You can fool most of the people some of the time, or at least most of the people who have a strong desire to be fooled — because they wish to protect the nuclear deal and its authors.

Iran’s conduct certainly suggests radicalization rather than moderation, and the past weeks have seen repeated ballistic missile tests. Ballistic missiles are not built and perfected in order to carry 500 pound “dumb” bombs; they are used to carry nuclear weapons. So Iran’s continued work on them suggests that it has never given up its nuclear ambitions, not even briefly for the sake of appearances.

The American response has been anemic, even pathetic; we threaten to raise the issue at the United Nations. Two missiles were test-fired today, with the phrase “Israel must be wiped out” written on them. These tests violate U.N. Security Council resolutions, but the American reaction is cautious: a speech, a debate in New York, perhaps some sanctions, but nothing that could possibly lead Iran to undo the nuclear deal. Because Iran knows that this will be the Obama administration’s reaction, expect more and more ballistic missile tests. Expect more conduct like the interception, capture, and humiliation of American sailors in the Gulf. Expect more Iranian military action throughout the region.

Some moderation.

The head of CENTCOM, Gen. Lloyd Austin, put it this way: “We see malign activity, not only throughout the region, but around the globe as well. … We’ve not yet seen any indication that they intend to pursue a different path. The fact remains that Iran today is a significant destabilizing force in the region. … Some of the behavior that we’ve seen from Iran of late is certainly not the behavior that you would expect to see from a nation that wants to be taken seriously as a respected member of the international community.”

Are we now, to turn to the second matter, gaining unparalleled insight into the Iranian nuclear program? Is this one of the achievements of the agreement? On the contrary, it seems. As the Associated Press put it, “The four Western countries that negotiated with Iran — the U.S., Britain, France and Germany — prefer more details than were evident in last month’s first post-deal [International Atomic Energy Agency] report. In contrast, the other two countries — Russia and China — consider the new report balanced, while Iran complains the report is too in-depth. IAEA chief Yukiya Amano feels he has struck the right balance, considering Iran is no longer in violation of U.N. and agency demands to curb its nuclear program. His report was much less detailed than pre-nuclear deal summaries.”

Much less detailed? Sure, because the U.N. Security Council resolutions under which the IAEA provided the detail, are gone, wiped out by the nuclear deal. The IAEA’s February 26 report was its first since the nuclear deal went into effect, and lacked details on matters such as uranium stockpiles, production of certain centrifuge parts, and progress by Iran toward meeting safeguard obligations. The Obama administration has wavered, sometimes saying there was enough detail, but then demanding more. The deal was sold, in part, as a way of providing transparency, but that does not appear to be accurate: it may in fact legitimize opacity. Earlier this week came a remarkable exchange between a reporter and State Department spokesman John Kirby, who defended the degree of knowledge we have.

Kirby said, “So we now know more than we’ve ever known, thanks to this deal, about Iran’s program.” The reporter, Matt Lee of AP, asked “How much near-20% highly enriched uranium does Iran now have?” Kirby replied, “I don’t know.” To which Lee noted, “You don’t know because it’s not in the IAEA report.”

So, the bases on which the nuclear agreement with Iran was sold appear to be crumbling. Moderates are not gaining power, Iran is not moderating its behavior, and we know less rather than more about what it is actually doing in its nuclear program. Some of those conclusions are denied by the administration and by credulous portions of the press, and others are ignored. But all those verbal games will not make us any safer.

From “Pressure Points” by Elliott Abrams. Reprinted with permission from the Council on Foreign Relations.

Iran’s Cash for Murder: Why is the UK Silent?

March 10, 2016

Iran’s Cash for Murder: Why is the UK Silent?

by Douglas Murray March 10, 2016 at 5:00 am

Source: Iran’s Cash for Murder: Why is the UK Silent?

  • The Iranian distribution of cash to families of terrorists is an open incitement to an ongoing campaign of murder. It should by now have not only been condemned by the whole world, but have caused a colossal rethink among the P5+1 nations that signed the ill-judged accord with Iran.
  • It is worth considering another recent Iranian development: the decision — allegedly by a conglomeration of media outlets, but hardly able to be separated from the government in a country whose press is more “government” than “free” — to increase the cash-bounty on the head of the British novelist Salman Rushdie.
  • The British government has been strangely mute on the matter. The “normalised” relations with Iran were meant to lead to business opportunities for Britain and an increase in decent behavior from Tehran. Instead, the first major test of Iranian-British relations in several decades turns out to be precisely the same test that the late Ayatollah Khomeini drew up in 1989.

Last year, when America, Britain and four other countries (the P5+1) signed their joint plan of action with Iran there was no shortage of people who warned of the consequences. They warned that the deal would merely delay rather than prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear-armed power. They warned of the increased grip the mullahs would have on the country they purport to govern. And in particular, those not caught up in the P5+1 jubilation warned of what Iran would do with the tens of billions of dollars’ cash bonanza it would receive once the deal was done. Would Iran use this windfall solely to improve the lives of its people? Or might it spend at least a portion of this cash doing what it has been doing for nearly four decades: that is, spreading terror?

There have already been some signs that the ill-judged deal is embedding Iran’s worst behaviour rather than elevating the regime to any higher behavioral level.

In recent days we have learned that Iran is already planning to use its windfall to encourage Palestinian terror against the State of Israel. Speaking at the end of last month, the Iranian Ambassador to Lebanon used a press conference with a number of Palestinian factions to announce a new bounty-scheme to be sponsored by Iran. This scheme promises to reward financially those who carry out terror against Israel. The reward includes — according to the Iranian ambassador — a payment of $7,000 to the families of suicide bombers and other terrorists who die in the process of attacking any Israeli. And it also includes a promised payment of $30,000 to any terrorists’ families whose homes are destroyed by the Israel Defense Forces. The demolition of the home of a terrorist’s family house is one of the only disincentives that Israel or any other country could think of to dissuade people intent on suicide attacks. Now the Iranian government is trying to re-incentivise anyone who might wish to commit such an attack.

Speaking in Beirut, Iran’s ambassador to Lebanon, Mohammad Mathali, said, “Continuing Iran’s support for the oppressed Palestinian people, Iran announces the provision of financial aid to families of Palestinian martyrs who were killed in the ‘Jerusalem Intifada.'” He is apparently referring to the lone-wolf knife-attack type of terrorism that has killed and wounded dozens of Israelis in recent months. As such, the Iranian distribution of cash is an open incitement to an ongoing campaign of murder. It should by now have not only been condemned by the whole world, but have caused a colossal rethink among the P5+1 nations that signed the ill-judged accord with Iran. But of course, Israel is always put in a different league in the stakes of international terror. Target Israelis and the “justifications” fly, and explanations deceitfully fill the air of why terrorism against Israelis is not quite the same as other terrorism.

So it is worth considering another Iranian development of recent days. Which is the decision — allegedly by a conglomeration of media outlets, but hardly able to be separated from the government in a country whose press is more “government” than “free” — to increase the cash bounty on the head of British novelist Salman Rushdie. The announcement was that an additional $600,000 had been added to the existing cash reward for whoever kills the author of a novel, The Satanic Verses. It is a cash-incentive to murder that was first issued twenty-seven years ago by the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

Iran’s then Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini put a cash bounty on the head of British novelist Salman Rushdie 27 years ago. Last month, a group of Iranian media outlets added $600,000 to the cash reward.

The additional bounty has been condemned by human rights activists and free speech defenders in the West such as Richard Dawkins and PEN.

But the British government has been strangely mute on the matter. It is strange because last summer when, against absolutely no public or political push-back in the UK, Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond signed Britain up to the P5+1 agreement, there was only official rejoicing over what our signature would do. Such “normalised” relations with Iran were meant to lead to business opportunities for Britain and an increase in decent behavior from Tehran. Instead, the first major test of Iranian-British relations in several decades turns out to be precisely the same test that the late Ayatollah Khomeini drew up in 1989. Certainly there are politicians of the right and left, including those who have themselves been “incentivised” by Iran, who have predicted a new dawn in relations between the two countries. But does it really it look as though, on the matter of whether or not a British novelist can be sentenced to death by a cleric in Iran, we are going to have to pretend to agree to disagree?

Britain’s silence on this matter is a shameful position for the government of any civilised country to find itself in, just as the silence on the terror being spread against Israel is a shameful position for the civilised world to find itself in. But in these twin events we can already see the Iran deal’s early results. The deal has done nothing to civilise a barbarian regime. All it has done is to spread that regime’s barbarism around what used to be the civilised world.

Douglas Murray, a leading British news analyst and commentator, is based in London.

Turkey’s Runaway Anti-Semitism

March 10, 2016

Turkey’s Runaway Anti-Semitism

by Burak Bekdil March 10, 2016 at 4:00 am

Source: Turkey’s Runaway Anti-Semitism

  • When it comes to diplomatic conflict between Turkey and Israel or Turkish anti-Semitism, there is always an unusual optimism in the official language chosen by Israeli officials or Jewish community leaders. Facts on the ground are a little bit different than the rosy picture.
  • If Turkish Jews are “safe and secure” in Turkey, why do they feel compelled to protect their schools and synagogues with heavy security? Why do most synagogues in Istanbul look almost like a U.S. embassy in Baghdad or Islamabad?
  • Anti-Semitism in Turkey reached such intensity that even anti-Semitic Islamists were not immune to anti-Semitic smear campaigns.

The 74th anniversary of an embarrassing tragedy took place in Turkey on February 24, 2016.

The MV Struma was a small iron-hulled ship built in 1867 as a steam-powered schooner, but was later re-engined with an unreliable second-hand diesel engine. In 1941, it was tasked with safely transporting an estimated 781 Jewish refugees from Axis-allied Romania to Britain’s Mandatory Palestine. Between its departure from Constanta on the Black Sea on Dec. 12, 1941 and arrival in Istanbul on Dec. 15, the vessel’s engine failed several times. On Feb. 23, 1942 with her engine still not running but the refugees aboard, Turkish authorities towed the Struma from Istanbul through the Bosporus out to the Black Sea. On the morning of Feb. 24, the Soviet submarine Shch-213 torpedoed the Struma, killing all but one of the refugees and 10 crew aboard.

Until this year Turkey, one of the main culprits, had only once commemorated the victims. This year, official Turkey decided, should be the second time. A wreath and carnations were hurled at the sea in the shadow of the horrible event that took place decades ago.

At the commemoration ceremony at Sarayburnu harbor on the Bosporus were the head of Turkey’s Jewish community, Ishak Ibrahimzadeh, Chief Rabbi Isak Haleva and Istanbul’s governor, Vasip Sahin. In his speech, Sahin said: “We observe that the necessary lessons were not drawn from such tragedies.” He was right, at least from a Turkish point of view.

When it comes to diplomatic conflict between Turkey and Israel or Turkish anti-Semitism, there is always an unusual optimism in the official language chosen by Israeli officials or Jewish community leaders.

For instance, Ibrahimzadeh praised “recent steps by the Turkish state to mend history with the Jewish community.” Echoing the same optimism, chairman Stephen Greenberg and executive vice chairman Malcolm Hoenlein of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, assured that Turkey’s small (less than 17,000-strong) Jewish community feels “safe and secure” despite being placed in the middle of a political feud between Turkey and Israel — sparked first in 2009 by then Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s clash with former Israeli President Shimon Peres at a World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

Such optimism in official narratives is normal, especially because Ankara and Jerusalem have been privately negotiating a deal to end their hostilities and normalize their diplomatic relations. Non-constructive, let alone explosive, speeches from any state or non-state actor will not help diplomats from either side in their efforts to reconcile. All the same, facts on the ground are a little bit different than the rosy picture.

If Turkish Jews are “safe and secure” in Turkey, why do they feel compelled to protect their schools and synagogues with heavy security? Why do most synagogues in Istanbul look almost like a U.S. embassy in Baghdad or Islamabad?

On Jan. 20, 2016, a Turkish synagogue in an old Jewish neighborhood in Istanbul was vandalized with anti-Semitic graffiti days after holding its first prayer service in 65 years. Vandals painted the external walls of the Istipol Synagogue with the script: “Terrorist Israel, there is Allah.”

“Writing anti-Israel speech on the wall [outside] of a synagogue is an act of anti-Semitism,” said Ivo Molinas, editor-in-chief of Turkish Jewish newspaper, Şalom. “Widespread anti-Semitism in Turkey gets in the way of celebrating the richness of cultural diversity in this country.”

Less than a month after that, a column in the radical Islamist Turkish daily Vahdet claimed that the evolutionary theory of “the Jew” Charles Darwin contradicts Allah’s word in the Koran and that in actual fact, monkeys evolved from perverted Jews whom Allah cursed and punished.

Unsurprisingly, the columnist, Seyfi Sahin, is a staunch supporter of President Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party. Sahin claims to be a physician, and argued that “Jews terrorize the world of science” and, “as a Jew, Darwin concocted his theory of evolution in order to turn Muslims away from their religion.” He further wrote:

“The aim of [Darwin’s] theory is to turn the non-Jews away from their religion, to harm their faith, and to make them suspicious about their religion. Darwin, being a Jew, believed, lived, and was buried according to his religion. His real targets were the Muslims … I believe that the gorillas and chimps living today in the forests of North Africa are cursed Jews. They are perverted humans that have mutated.”

There are no reports of Sahin being investigated or prosecuted under Turkey’s anti-racism laws. Not surprising. No such case has ever been heard of.

More recently, there was the curious case of Yusuf Kaplan, a Turkish Islamist columnist and a darling of Erdogan and his supporters — until he dared to criticize the government’s foreign policy. Kaplan a columnist for Yeni Safak, one of Erdogan’s favorite newspapers and one of his staunchest supporters, argued in a television appearance that the government’s foreign policy was incompatible with regional realities. So what? Not so difficult to guess.

Leading users on social media called for Kaplan’s death and accused him of killing another pro-government journalist, of being a British spy and of “collusion with the Jews.” Many called him a “Jewish stooge.” A Jewish stooge? The man has a remarkable record of making anti-Semitic statements, including his claim that “Jews rule the Western universities and world media and that their paranoia can reach barbaric, cruel and inhuman dimensions.”

Turkish newspaper columnist Seyfi Sahin (left), a staunch supporter of Turkey’s President Erdogan, wrote, “I believe that the gorillas and chimps living today in the forests of North Africa are cursed Jews. They are perverted humans that have mutated.” Yusuf Kaplan (right), another Turkish newspaper columnist, also has a record of making anti-Semitic statements. But when he criticized government policy, he was accused of being a “Jewish stooge.”

On the 74th anniversary of the Struma tragedy, anti-Semitism in Turkey reached such intensity that even anti-Semitic Islamists were not immune to anti-Semitic smear campaigns.

Burak Bekdil, based in Ankara, is a Turkish columnist for the Hürriyet Daily and a Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

Syrian Kurds accuse Turkey of aiding sarin gas delivery to rebels after fresh chemical attacks

March 10, 2016

Syrian Kurds accuse Turkey of aiding sarin gas delivery to rebels after fresh chemical attacks

Published time: 10 Mar, 2016 01:09 Edited time: 10 Mar, 2016 02:18

Source: Syrian Kurds accuse Turkey of aiding sarin gas delivery to rebels after fresh chemical attacks — RT News

In an interview with RT, a spokesman for the Kurdish YPG militia accused Turkey of providing a clear transit route for the chemical weapons that were deployed against them near the city of Aleppo on Tuesday.

READ MORE: ISIS shelled Kurdish-controlled Iraq village with ‘poisonous substances’ – governor

Read more

Aleppo, Syria © Hosam Katan

Syrian anti-government militants “took advantage of the ceasefire” to launch attacks against a Kurdish-controlled area near Aleppo in northern Syria, Redur Xelil told RT. The attackers targeted a civilian district of what was once Syria’s biggest city, and has since become a key battleground. According to Xelil, the shells emitted an “unnatural smell” and “yellow smoke” upon impact, indicating that chemical weapons were involved.

“Our sources inside the rebel groups have confirmed that toxic substances were used. We also have verified information that sarin gas was delivered to them from Turkey. All signs point to the fact that these factions were using banned weapons, but we cannot access the launching area, as it is located on the front between the Turkish and rebel forces,” Xelil told RT by Skype from Rojava in Syria.

Kurdish deputies in the Turkish parliament have previously accused Ankara of supplying Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) and other jihadist groups inside Syria with chemical weapons, which are used both in their fight against the Syrian government and to pin responsibility for their deployment on the regime of President Bashar Assad.

Tuesday’s attack, which also involved phosphorus, did not result in any severe casualties.

“This attack was a failure, but this doesn’t mean that there won’t be another one. We are convinced the enemy has improvised shells containing phosphorus and sarin gas,” said Xelil.

READ MORE: Who’s behind alleged Aleppo chemical weapons attack?

Last month, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) accused IS of using chemical weapons against Kurdish forces throughout 2015. Reports emerged on Wednesday revealing that the jihadist group had launched a new chemical attack on the Kurdish village of Zaza in northern Iraq, in which more than 40 civilians suffered chemical burns and lung damage.

 

US Presbyterian Church officials promote the BDS Movement

March 10, 2016

US Presbyterian Church officials promote the BDS Movement and justify Palestinian terrorism According to NGO Monitor, a new document published by the US Presbyterian Church promotes the BDS Movement against Israel and downplays Palestinian terrorism: “International law gives an occupied people the right to armed struggle to resist the occupier.”

Mar 10, 2016, 3:34PM

Source: US Presbyterian Church officials promote the BDS Movement | JerusalemOnline.com

 

image description
Photo Credit: Wikipedia Commons

According to NGO Monitor, a new document published by the US Presbyterian Church promotes the BDS Movement against Israel and downplays Palestinian terrorism. The report is titled “Israel-Palestine: For Human Values in the Absence of a Just Peace” and it was released by the Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy of the US Presbyterian Church. The report will be presented at the 2015 PCUSA General Assembly.

Other NGOs that were relied upon for this report include Sabeel, which leads church divestment campaigns, supports a one-state solution, and promotes liberation theology that displays Jesus as a modern-day Palestinian who is oppressed by Israel and the Jewish people; Christ at a Checkpoint, which promotes anti-Semitic themes such a replacement theology, utilizes Christian rhetoric in order to demonize Israel, and also makes comparisons between Jesus and the modern-day Palestinians; and Badil, which supports a Palestinian right of return, declared an anti-Semitic cartoon the winner of their cartoon contest in 2010, and whose representatives went on a speaking tour together with Zochrot in order to teach American college students about the Nakba.

US Presbyterian Church representatives also met with representatives of other highly politicized NGOs including B’tselem, which has been accused of misrepresenting international law, employing skewed statistics, and promoting inaccurate research in order to pursue their political agenda which is apparently against Israel as Tuvia Tenenbom interviewed a B’tselem researcher named Atef Abu A-Rub for his 2014 book ‘Catch the Jew’ and he referred to the Holocaust as a lie and accused Germany of giving money to the Jews; Breaking the Silence, who has donors who give money conditional upon them coming up with testimonies against the IDF and whose members partook in a Jews for Justice for Palestinians flotilla, and Rabbis for Human Rights, whose President Rabbi Arik Aschermwan was exposed by Tenenbom as holding anti-Israel positions despite claiming to be impartial, displaying ignorance about the Bible, as not interacting regularly with the people in the territories that he claims to care about and whose own wife claims: “No facts will persuade him.”

Based upon their consultations with such organizations without bothering to speak with others who hold a different point of view, the US Presbyterian Church document compares Israeli settlers to Hamas terrorists, portrayed Israeli strikes against Hamas as an attack upon the democratically elected leaders of the Palestinian Authority, and they argued that even though Israel claims the Palestinians implement terror attacks, “international law gives an occupied people the right to armed struggle to resist the occupier.” The report also claims that despite the rocket attacks and other violence that characterizes the Knife Intifada, Israelis live relatively secure lives, thus implying that Israeli arguments in favor of having strong security measures don’t hold validity.

Additionally, they noted “the traditional freedom of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and other religious, civic, and private organizations in the United States to determine their own practices of investment or divestment, boycott or selective purchasing.” They called upon General Assembly members to read documents like Christ at a Checkpoint and Kairos Palestine, which criticized Israel for imprisoning terrorists, supports a Palestinian right of return to Israel proper, blamed Israel instead of the Palestinian Authority for the shrinking Christian population in the territories even though the Palestinian territories had a positive Christian population growth rate under Israeli control and the population only started to shrink when the Palestinian Authority took over, and referred to Palestinian terror attacks as resistance to the occupation. Both the Christ at a Checkpoint and Kairos Palestine documents oppose Jewish self-determination and call for BDS against Israel. In conclusion, they called upon General Assembly members to hold hearings regarding US military aid to Israel, to enforce US laws on the labeling of Israeli settlement products and to bar Israelis from benefiting from the US Visa Waiver Program.

“This report, based on selective claims, myths and distortions from anti-peace NGOs promotes boycotts under the guise of religious responsibility,” Professor Gerald Steinberg said. “For years some factions of the Presbyterian Church have echoed calls by radical anti-peace NGOs promoting discriminatory attacks against Israel, while ignoring murderous Palestinian terror. Last year, these groups convinced the PCUSA to vote to join the BDS attack. Now, the ACSWP is again promoting this agenda, including the promotion of anti-Semitic theological themes. In order to advance peace between Israelis and Palestinians, PCUSA’s 2016 General Assembly must reject the blatant bias, distortions and immorality of the ACSWP report.”

 

Iranian official: “Iran’s missile program will not stop under any circumstances”

March 10, 2016

Iranian official says Iran never accepted UN Security Council resolutions regarding missile program The Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) claim that in light of the missile trials and the wave of international criticism of them, the Islamic Republic of Iran does not recognize the UN Security Council’s decisions regarding the country’s missile program.

Mar 10, 2016, 2:00PM Becca Noy

Source: Iranian official: “Iran’s missile program will not stop under any circumstances” | JerusalemOnline.com

For a few days, Iran has been testing ballistic missiles and today (Thursday), a senior level IRGC official said that “we never accepted the UN Security Council resolutions on Iran’s missile work.”

Yesterday (Wednesday), Israeli officials strongly condemned the trials that were conducted in Iran recently, in which long range missiles that can reach any destination in Israel were tested. In addition, threats against Israel were inscribed on some of the missiles.

Missing Clinton E-Mail Claims Saudis Financed Benghazi Attacks

March 10, 2016

Missing Clinton E-Mail Claims Saudis Financed Benghazi Attacks

William Reynolds

Source: Missing Clinton E-Mail Claims Saudis Financed Benghazi Attacks — Medium

Something that has gone unnoticed in all the talk about the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s e-mails is the content of the original leak that started the entire investigation to begin with. In March of 2013, a Romanian hacker calling himself Guccifer hacked into the AOL account of Sidney Blumenthal and leaked to Russia Today four e-mails containing intelligence on Libya that Blumenthal sent to Hillary Clinton.

For those who haven’t been following this story, Sidney Blumenthal is a long time friend and adviser of the Clinton family who in an unofficial capacity sent many “intelligence memos” to Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State. Originally displayed on RT.com in Comic Sans font on a pink background with the letter “G” clumsily drawn as a watermark, no one took these leaked e-mails particularly seriously when they came out in 2013. Now, however, we can cross reference this leak with the e-mails the State Department released to the public.

The first three e-mails in the Russia Today leak from Blumenthal to Clinton all appear word for word in the State Department release. The first e-mail Clinton asks to have printed and she also forwards it to her deputy chief of staff, Jake Sullivan. The second e-mail Clinton describes as “useful insight” and forwards it to Jake Sullivan asking him to circulate it. The third e-mail is also forwarded to Jake Sullivan. The fourth e-mail is missing from the State Department record completely.

This missing e-mail from February 16, 2013 only exists in the original leak and states that French and Libyan intelligence agencies had evidence that the In Amenas and Benghazi attacks were funded by “Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia.” This seems like a rather outlandish claim on the surface, and as such was only reported by conspiracy types and fringe media outlets. Now, however, we have proof that the other three e-mails in the leak were real correspondence from Blumenthal to Clinton that she not only read, but thought highly enough of to send around to others in the State Department. Guccifer speaks English as a second language and most of his writing consists of rambling conspiracies, it’s unlikely he would be able to craft such a convincing fake intelligence briefing. This means we have an e-mail from a trusted Clinton adviser that claims the Saudis funded the Benghazi attack, and not only was this not followed up on, but there is not any record of this e-mail ever existing except for the Russia Today leak.

Why is this e-mail missing? At first I assumed it must be due to some sort of cover up, but it’s much simpler than that. The e-mail in question was sent after February 1st, 2013, when John Kerry took over as Secretary of State, so it was not part of the time period being investigated. No one is trying to find a copy of this e-mail. Since Clinton wasn’t Secretary of State on February 16th, it wasn’t her job to follow up on it.

So let’s forget for a minute about the larger legal implications of the e-mail investigation. How can it be that such a revelation about Saudi Arabia was made public in a leak that turned out to be real and no one looked into it? Clearly Sidney Blumenthal was someone that Hillary Clinton trusted. Two months earlier, Secretary Clinton found his insights valuable enough to share with the entire State Department. But two weeks after her job as Secretary of State ends, she receives an e-mail from him claiming Saudi Arabia financed the assassination of an American ambassador and apparently did nothing with this information. Even if she didn’t have to turn over this e-mail to the commission investigating the Benghazi attacks, wouldn’t it be relevant? Shouldn’t this be information she volunteers? And why didn’t the Republicans who were supposedly so concerned about the Benghazi attacks ask any questions about Saudi involvement?

Did Secretary Clinton not tell anyone what she knew about alleged Saudi involvement in the attacks because she didn’t want to endanger the millions of dollars of Saudi donations coming in to the Clinton Foundation? These are exactly the kind of conflicts that ethical standards are designed to prevent.

Another E-Mail Turns Up Missing

Guccifer uncovered something else in his hack that could not be verified until the last of the e-mails were released by the State Department last week. In addition to the four full e-mails he released, he also leaked a screenshot of Sidney Blumenthal’s AOL inbox. If we cross reference this screenshot with the Blumenthal e-mails in the State Department release, we can see that the e-mail with the subject “H: Libya security latest. Sid” is missing from the State Department e-mails.

This missing e-mail is certainly something that would have been requested as part of the investigation as it was sent before February 1st and clearly relates to Libya. The fact that it is missing suggests one of two possibilities:

  1. The State Department does have a copy of this e-mail but deemed it top secret and too sensitive to release, even in redacted form. This would indicate that Sidney Blumenthal was sending highly classified information from his AOL account to Secretary Clinton’s private e-mail server despite the fact that he never even had a security clearance to deal with such sensitive information in the first place. If this scenario explains why the e-mail is missing, classified materials were mishandled.
  2. The State Department does not have a copy, and this e-mail was deleted by both Clinton and Blumenthal before turning over their subpoenaed e-mails to investigators, which would be considered destruction of evidence and lying to federal officials. This also speaks to the reason why the private clintonemail.com server may have been established in the first place. If Blumenthal were to regularly send highly sensitive yet technically “unclassified” information from his AOL account to Clinton’s official government e-mail account, it could have been revealed with a FOIA request. It has already been established that Hillary Clinton deleted 15 of Sidney Blumenthal’s e-mails to her, this discrepancy was discovered when Blumenthal’s e-mails were subpoenaed, although a State Department official claims that none of these 15 e-mails have any information about the Benghazi attack. It would seem from the subject line that this e-mail does. And it is missing from the public record.

In either of these scenarios, Clinton and her close associates are in violation of federal law. In the most generous interpretation where this e-mail is simply a collection of rumors that Blumenthal heard and forwarded unsolicited to Clinton, it would make no sense for it to be missing. It would not be classified if it was a bunch of hot air, and it certainly wouldn’t be deleted by both Blumenthal and Clinton at the risk of committing a felony. In the least generous interpretation of these facts, Sidney Blumenthal and Hillary Clinton conspired to cover up an ally of the United States funding the assassination of one of our diplomats in Libya.

Why A Grand Jury Is Likely Already Convened

After the final e-mails were released by the State Department on February 29th, it has been reported in the last week that:

  • Clinton’s IT staff member who managed the e-mail server, Bryan Pagliano, has been given immunity by a federal judge which suggests that he will be giving testimony to a grand jury about evidence that relates to this investigation and implicates himself in a crime. Until now, Pagliano has been pleading the fifth and refusing to cooperate with the investigation.
  • The hacker Guccifer (Marcel Lazar Lehel) just had an 18-month temporary extradition order to the United States granted by a Romanian court, despite being indicted by the US back in 2014. Is Guccifer being extradited now in order to testify to the grand jury that the screengrab with the missing e-mail is real?
  • Attorney General Loretta Lynch was interviewed by Bret Baier and she would not answer whether or not a grand jury has been convened in this case. If there was no grand jury she could have said so, but if a grand jury is meeting to discuss evidence she would not legally be allowed to comment on it.

This scandal has the potential to completely derail the Clinton campaign in the general election. If Hillary Clinton really cares about the future of this country and the Democratic party, she will step down now while there is still time to nominate another candidate. This is not a right wing conspiracy, it is a failure by one of our highest government officials to uphold the laws that preserve government transparency and national security. It’s time for us to ask Secretary Clinton to tell us the truth and do the right thing. If the United States government is really preparing a case against Hillary Clinton, we can’t wait until it’s too late.

IS Registration Forms Identify 22,000 Jihadis

March 10, 2016

IS Registration Forms Identify 22,000 Jihadis Thousands of documents detailing phone numbers and family contacts are handed to Sky News by a disillusioned convert to the group.

Source: IS Registration Forms Identify 22,000 Jihadis

See video,s in original article

Tens of thousands of documents, containing 22,000 names, addresses, telephone numbers and family contacts of Islamic State jihadis, have been obtained by Sky News.

Nationals from at least 51 countries, including the UK, had to give up their most personal information as they joined the terror organisation.

Only when the 23-question form was filled in were they inducted into IS.

A lot of the names and their new Islamic State names on the registration forms are well known.

Abdel Bary, a 26-year-old from London joined in 2013 after visiting Libya, Egypt and Turkey.

He is designated as a fighter but is better known in the UK as a rap artist.

His whereabouts are unknown.

:: Who Are The Britons In The Islamic State Files?

Another jihadi named in the documents, now dead after being targeted in a drone strike, is Junaid Hussain, the head of Islamic State’s media wing who along with his wife former punk Sally Jones, plotted attacks in the UK.

Her whereabouts are unknown.

Reyaad Khan from Cardiff, who also entered in 2013, is also among those found among the registration forms.

He was well known for appearing in a highly produced Islamic State propaganda video.

He was later killed.

But the key breakthrough from the documents is the revealing of the identities of a number of previously unknown jihadis in the UK, across northern Europe, much of the Middle East and North Africa, as well as in the United States and Canada.

Their whereabouts are crucial to breaking the organisation and preventing further terror attacks.

Many of the men passed through a series of jihadi “hotspots” – such as Yemen, Sudan, Tunisia, Libya, Pakistan and Afghanistan – on multiple occasions, but were apparently unchecked, unmonitored and able to both enter Syria to fight and then to return home.

One of the files marked “Martyrs” detailed a brigade manned entirely by fighters who wanted to carry out suicide attacks and were trained to do so.

:: IS Files: A ‘Goldmine Of Information’ For Intelligence Agents

Some of the telephone numbers on the list are still active and it is believed that although many will be family members, a significant number are used by the jihadis themselves.

The files were passed to Sky News on a memory stick stolen from the head of Islamic State’s internal security police, an organisation described by insiders as the group’s SS.

He had been entrusted to protect the organisation’s core secrets and he rarely parted with the drive.

The man who stole it was a former Free Syrian Army convert to Islamic State who calls himself Abu Hamed.

Disillusioned with the Islamic State leadership, he says it has now been taken over by former soldiers from the Iraqi Baath party of Saddam Hussein.

He claims the Islamic rules he believed have totally collapsed inside the organisation, prompting him to quit.

I met him in a secret location in Turkey, and he said IS was giving up on its headquarters in Raqqa and moving into the central deserts of Syria and ultimately Iraq, the group’s birthplace.

He also claimed that in reality Islamic State, the Kurdish YPG and the Syrian government of Bashar al Assad, are working together against the moderate Syrian opposition.

Asked if the IS files could bring the network down he nodded and said simply: “God willing”.

From the attacks in Tunisia and the Bataclan massacre in Paris, it is clear that IS is refocusing its base of operations abroad and is intent on carrying out high-profile attacks in Western countries, something that security chiefs across Europe are warning about right now.

Sky News has informed the authorities about the haul.