Archive for February 2013

Fars News Agency :: Iran’s Top Security Official to Leave for Damascus Today

February 2, 2013

Fars News Agency :: Iran’s Top Security Official to Leave for Damascus Today.

( And now a word from the enemies of civilization… – JW )

TEHRAN (FNA)- Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Saeed Jalili is slated to leave Tehran for Damascus later today to meet Syrian officials on bilateral ties and regional issues.

Heading a high-ranking security delegation, Jalili will embark on a visit to the Syrian capital later today to hold talks on the developments in the region.

The visit comes as Syria has been grappling with unrests for the last two years and came under an Israeli air raid three days ago. Israel attacked a Syrian scientific center in Jamraya, 25 kilometers (15 miles) Northwest of the Capital Damascus on Wednesday.

The Syrian Army said in a statement on Wednesday that two people were killed and five others injured in an Israeli airstrike on a scientific center in Jamraya, 25 kilometers (15 miles) Northwest of the capital Damascus.

Iranian Ambassador to Beirut Qazanfar Roknabadi rapped the Zionist regime for its recent aggression against Syria, and said Israel is following the Syrian developments greedily to find an opportunity to hit a blow at the Resistance Front.

“Since the onset of the crisis in Syria, the Islamic Republic of Iran has supported the popular demands, while warning against the plots which have been hatched on this path, and it has stressed that the usurper Zionist regime is looking greedily at the developments in Syria and their main goal is weakening the Resistance front,” Roknabadi said in a meeting with Head of Lebanon’s Syrian Social Nationalist Party (SSNP) Asa’ad Hardan in Beirut on Saturday.

He rapped the Zionist regime for its recent attack against Syria, and said, “It revealed their covert goal and meanwhile showed that the regime has failed to attain its objectives and consequently embarked on taking direct action.”

Hardan, for his part, said that Israel’s recent attack against Syria is an evidence of the enemies’ desperateness and hopelessness amid Iran’s strong support for Syria and the brave resistance of President Bashar al-Assad and the Syrian people against their plots.

Syria has been experiencing unrest since March 2011 with organized attacks by well-armed gangs against Syrian police forces and border guards being reported across the country.

Hundreds of people, including members of the security forces, have been killed, when some protest rallies turned into armed clashes.

The government blames outlaws, saboteurs, and armed terrorist groups for the deaths, stressing that the unrest is being orchestrated from abroad.

The US and its western and regional allies have long sought to topple Assad and his ruling system. Media reports said that the Syrian rebels and terrorist groups have received significantly more and better weapons in recent weeks, a crime paid for by the Persian Gulf Arab states and coordinated by the United States.

The US daily, Washington Post, reported in May that the Syrian rebels and terrorist groups battling the President Bashar al-Assad’s government have received significantly more and better weapons in recent weeks, a crime paid for by the Persian Gulf Arab states and coordinated by the United States.

The newspaper, quoting opposition activists and US and foreign officials, reported that Obama administration officials emphasized the administration has expanded contacts with opposition military forces to provide the Persian Gulf nations with assessments of rebel credibility and command-and-control infrastructure.

Opposition activists who several months ago said the rebels were running out of ammunition said in May that the flow of weapons – most bought on the black market in neighboring countries or from elements of the Syrian military in the past – has significantly increased after a decision by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other Persian Gulf states to provide millions of dollars in funding each month.

Off topic: ‘Fiercely proud’ Koch died on the exact anniversary of the murder of his hero, Daniel Pearl

February 2, 2013

‘Fiercely proud’ Koch died on the exact anniversary of the murder of his hero, Daniel Pearl – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

( Koch was mayor when I lived in NYC.  Last week he posted one of his almost weekly editorials supporting Israel.  The world is a poorer place without him. ז”ל  – JW )

Koch had Pearl’s last words – ‘My father is Jewish. My mother is Jewish. I am Jewish’ – engraved on his headstone several years ago. He will be buried on Monday at Manhattan’s Trinity Church Cemetery.

By | Feb.01, 2013 | 7:03 PM | 2
Koch

In this July 16, 1984, file photo, New York Mayor Ed Koch raises his hands with two thumbs up while addressing the opening session of the Democratic National Convention in San Francisco. Photo by AP
Koch's headstone

Koch’s headstone in Manhattan.

Former New York mayor Ed Koch, who died early Friday morning, decided a few years ago to have his headstone engraved with the last words of American-Jewish journalist Daniel Pearl who was slain by Islamic militants in Pakistan: “My father is Jewish. My mother is Jewish. I am Jewish.”

And in a coincidence that can only be described as startling, Koch passed away at New York’s Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia on the very same date that Pearl, who had dual American and Israeli citizenship, was beheaded 11 years ago near Karachi.

Koch’s funeral will take place on Monday at New York’s Temple Emanuel – but he will be buried at a cemetery belonging to Manhattan’s Episcopalian Trinity Church. Koch’s headstone, which also boasts a Magen David and the Shma prayer in Hebrew and English, was placed in the cemetery, which is located on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, three years ago.

Koch paid $20,000 for the cemetery plot five years ago, saying that he had chosen it because it was the only cemetery in Manhattan that was still active. “I don’t want to leave Manhattan, even when I’m gone,” Koch told The Associated Press. “This is my home. The thought of having to go to New Jersey was so distressing to me.”

Koch told the New York Times in 2008 that he had consulted with rabbis about his plan to be buried in a church cemetery. “I called a number of rabbis to see if this was doable,” he said. “I was going to do it anyway, but it would be nice if it were doable traditionally.” He said he had been advised to request that the gate nearest his plot be inscribed as “the gate for the Jews,” and the cemetery agreed. He also built rails around his plot, as instructed.

Koch was born in 1924 in the Bronx to parents who had come to New York as refugees from Poland. In his autobiography, Koch wrote “My parents would never be like the assimilated German Jews who looked down on us. Neither of my parents was very religious, but being Jewish was very important to them.”

So it was to Koch, who was often the victim of anti-Semitic bullies in Newark, where he grew up. Asked once about his proud attachment to – and uninhibited exhibition of – his Judaism”, Koch once said: “Jews have always thought that having someone elevated with his head above the grass was not good for the Jews. I never felt that way. I believe that you have to stand up.”

On his headstone he also had the following epitaph inscribed: “He was fiercely proud of his Jewish faith. He fiercely defended the City of New York, and he fiercely loved its people. Above all, he loved his country, the United States of America, in whose armed forces he served in World War II.”

A documentary about Koch’s life, entitled “koch” opened on Friday in New York theaters, on the very day that the colorful three term mayor passed away. Even in death, Koch retained the trait that is critical for any showman of his stature: impeccable timing.

Eiland: Israel attacked Syria ‘with good reason’

February 2, 2013

Eiland: Israel attacked Syria ‘with good reason’ | The Times of Israel.

Former security official praises Jerusalem’s decision to carry out unconfirmed strike on its northerly neighbor

February 2, 2013, 4:28 pm
Former National Security Adviser Major General (ret.) Giora Eiland (photo credit: flash90)

Former National Security Adviser Major General (ret.) Giora Eiland (photo credit: Flash90)

Two days after he told Channel 2 that he does not believe the tension between Israel and Syria is a thing of the past, former national security adviser Maj.-Gen. (ret.) Giora Eiland confirmed that it was Israel that carried out the strikes on several sites in Syria overnight Tuesday — “and with good reason.”

Speaking at an event in Kfar Saba Saturday, Eiland praised the Israeli government’s decision to carry out the strikes, saying it was “the right decision, despite all the risks.”

Israel has not officially acknowledged that it carried out the raids, although the US has indicated that Israel did so. Eiland’s comments marked the closest step yet toward Israeli confirmation, but since he is no longer in official government service, they still do not constitute a formal Israel acknowledgement..

He added that there were three things Israel could not agree to with regard to Lebanese-based Shi’ite terrorist organization Hezbollah — it could not be allowed to attain long-range missiles with large missile heads, advanced anti-aircraft missiles “which would restrict the movements of the Israeli Air Force,” and chemical weapons.

The fear that Syria’s unconventional weapons could fall into the hands of groups such as Hezbollah may have been what prompted the Tuesday strikes, according to a TIME magazine report Friday.

In his television interview Thursday, Eiland had said there was a chance that the situation between Israel and Syria could heat up, describing a symbolic Syrian missile launch against Israel as a possible trigger that could seriously worsen an already tense situation.

Eiland said for years there has been a red line, an almost “quiet agreement” between Syria and Israel, by which no anti-aircraft, Scud missiles or similar arms — or chemical weapons — would be transferred from Syria to Hezbollah in Lebanon. As far as actual intelligence, right now little is actually known about what is happening, he claimed.

If another attempt is made to move red-line weapons, Israel faces a dilemma, he said. Israel could act, but then faces the chance of escalation.

Turkish FM slams Assad for not responding to Israeli strike

February 2, 2013

Turkish FM slams Assad for not responding to Israeli strike | The Times of Israel.

( Wow… This goes beyond the usual self parody… Through the looking glass. .. Turkey begged for and received NATO patriots to defend against Assad.  Now Turkey attacks Assad for NOT attacking Israel.  Oh, and throws in a “conspiracy theory” for good measure.  I think it’s time NATO booted a country that claims to be more extreme than Assad. – JW )

Ahmet Davutoglu says his government will not stand by as Israel attacks a Muslim country

February 2, 2013, 3:02 pm
Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu attends a press conference in Davos, Switzerland, last month (photo credit: AP/Michel Euler)

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu attends a press conference in Davos, Switzerland, last month (photo credit: AP/Michel Euler)

Turkey’s foreign minister blasted embattled Syrian President Bashar Assad on Saturday for not responding to an alleged Israeli strike on targets in Syria.

On his way to Munich, where he will meet with world leaders to discuss developments in Syria, Ahmet Davutoglu asked reporters, ”Why didn’t Assad even throw a pebble when Israeli jets were flying over his palace and playing with the dignity of his country?”

Davutoglu suggested that the Syrian leader is conspiring with Israel: “Is there a secret agreement between Assad and Israel? The Assad regime only abuses. Why don’t you use the same power that you use against defenseless women against Israel, which you have seen as an enemy since its foundation,” he said, according to The Hurriyet news agency.

The foreign minister said that Turkey will not stand by as Israel attacks a Muslim country.

“Syria must do what a country under attack has to do,” Today’s Zaman quoted Davutoglu as saying, seemingly goading the Assad regime to retaliate.

Media outlets throughout the world have reported that the Israeli Air Force carried out several strikes against targets in Syria overnight Tuesday. Among the reported targets was a convoy presumably carrying  advanced weapons to the terror group Hezbollah in Lebanon, as well as a so-called research facility, where non-conventional weapons were reportedly stationed.

A report in TIME magazine on Friday claimed that Israeli jets also struck at a biological weapons research center.

The US government has given the “green light” for Israeli to conduct further similar strikes, according to the report.

Also on Friday, outgoing US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta appeared to confirm that it was in fact Israel that had stuck targets in Syria — the Israeli government has remained reticent on the matter. He suggested that Washington was fully behind Israeli efforts to prevent advanced weapons from landing in the hands of terrorists.

“We have expressed the concern that we have to do everything we can to make sure that sophisticated weapons like SA-17 missiles or, for that matter chemical biological weapons, do not fall into the hands of terrorists,” he told AFP.

Why We Won’t Secure Syria’s Chemical Weapons – The Daily Beast

February 2, 2013

Why We Won’t Secure Syria’s Chemical Weapons – The Daily Beast.

( A good example of ideology at work.  The leftist “Daily Beast” is anti-Israel instinctively.  The only time they’ll support Israel is when it can be used to undercut the US doing anything against radical Islam.  More “through the looking glass” stuff.  Curiouser and curiouser… – JW )

Gil Troy, responding to news that Israel may have struck Syrian chemical weapons—or SA-17 surface-to-air missiles (reports remain unclear)—recommends a “raid” to secure Syria’s chemical weapons. The complexity of such a venture’s actual requirements, combined with the exaggeration of the threat, make it an incredibly dangerous idea.

Israeli F-15 Eagle fighter jet

An Israeli F-15 Eagle fighter jet takes off from an Israeli Air Force Base on Nov. 19, 2012. (Jack Guez/AFP, via Getty)

Seizing Syria’s chemical weapons sites would require at least 75,000 ground troops, according to Pentagon estimates. Simply clearing Syrian airspace would require around six times as many aircraft as employed in Libya—and supporting ground troops would require yet more still. “Raid” or not, any incursion into Syrian territory, especially into weapons depots co-located with major population centers and Syrian military deployments, will resemble a full-fledged invasion. Any operation that requires sending thousands of troops into a hostile state, and leaving them there until a new regime emerges, is not just an invasion but also an occupation of discrete parts of Syria.

Not only that, but such an incursion would be heavily reliant on the U.S., since virtually no other country is currently prepared to conduct any kind of large-scale ground incursion deep into Syrian territory. In Libya, the U.S. disproportionately provided the sophisticated requirements of dismantling air defenses, providing surveillance and reconnaissance, and refueling and airlift. (The U.S. also assists even powerful militaries such as France’s with similar tasks in Mali.) In Syria, the lack of foreign militaries properly trained and equipped for dealing with chemical weapons would force U.S. ground capabilities into the lead, too. Potential ground allies, such as Jordan and Turkey, will not be able to independently launch deep operations into Syria. (Regardless, they have more pressing concerns with border security.)

Keeping troops deployed only until “some stable Syrian leadership emerges” is not a prophylactic against mission creep: it’s an invitation. Libya—again, the example—still lacks a government that can prevent arms trafficking. Guarding Syrian depots would provide potentially ripe targets for pro-regime insurgents, Lebanese Hezbollah, Iranian Pasdaran, and radical rebel groups such as Jabhat al Nusra which may sour to Western troops. Waiting until a Syrian government emerges is not a plan but a prayer, particularly if the invasion occurs before the rebels are actually strong enough to overthrow the Syrian government themselves.

Those difficulties aside, an invasion is out of proportion with Syria’s chemical weapons threat. While horrific and dangerous, chemical weapons’ value for non-state actors is more psychological than practical. Al Qaeda in London killed more people and wounded nearly as many with cheap, simple backpack bombs than Aum Shinrikyo did in the Tokyo Sarin attack. Chemical weapons are expensive to operate, dangerous to transport, and easier to track—and require massive use with artillery and aircraft to be truly effective. The thousands learning bombmaking and infantry tactics in Syria are a more probable threat to the U.S. and many of its allies than chemical weapons. Gas is dangerous, but hardly worth a ground campaign in Syria.

Israel is not taking out the world’s garbage—it is conducting limited airstrikes, as it has done in Sudan and elsewhere, to prevent weapons shipments to or within its borders. While conducting such strikes is arguably justifiable, it is hardly doing the rest of the world a favor worth repaying with a war of this scale. Instead, like Israel, the rest of the world ought make measured judgments about discrete threats beyond its borders. None of those require what would be the largest and most reckless military operation since the Iraq War. Given tightening defense budgets, expanding al Qaeda threats in North Africa, an ongoing war in Afghanistan, and rising tension in Asia, putting troops into Syria is the last thing the U.S. needs. In the eyes of history, what appears to be quick and decisive often becomes rash and reckless.

Biden says US ready for direct talks, if Iran is serious

February 2, 2013

Biden says US ready for direct talks, if Iran is serious | The Times of Israel.

American VP claims there’s still time for diplomacy; Russian FM says world must convince Iran that it doesn’t seek regime change

February 2, 2013, 1:18 pm
US Vice President Joe Biden speaks to reporters in Berlin, Germany, ahead of a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Friday (photo credit: AP/Markus Schreiber)

US Vice President Joe Biden speaks to reporters in Berlin, Germany, ahead of a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Friday (photo credit: AP/Markus Schreiber)

MUNICH (AP) — The United States is prepared to hold direct talks with Iran in the standoff over its nuclear ambitions, Vice President Joe Biden said Saturday — but he insisted that Tehran must show it is serious and Washington won’t engage in such talks “just for the exercise.”

Washington has indicated in the past that it’s prepared to talk directly with Iran, and talks involving all five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany have made little headway. Several rounds of international sanctions have cut into Iran’s oil sales and financial transactions.

Last month Iran, in a defiant move ahead of a new round of talks expected soon with the six powers, announced plans to vastly increase its pace of uranium enrichment. That can be used to make both reactor fuel and the fissile core of warheads.

Biden told an international security conference that “there is still time, there is still space for diplomacy backed by pressure to succeed.” He did not specify any timeframe.

He insisted that “the ball is in the government of Iran’s court” to show that it’s negotiating in good faith.

Asked when Washington might hold direct talks with Tehran, Biden replied: “when the Iranian leadership, the supreme leader (Ayatollah Ali Khamenei), is serious.”

The US has long made clear that it is prepared to meet directly with the Iranian leadership, he added — “that offer stands but it must be real and tangible and there has to be an agenda that they’re prepared to speak to.”

“We’re not prepared to do it just for the exercise,” Biden told the Munich Security Conference.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, whose country is a key player in the six-nation talks with Iran, said he “would strongly support what Vice President Biden said about the need for incentives to be clearly shown to Iran.”

“We have to convince Iran that it is not about the regime change,” he said.

Iran insists it does not want nuclear arms and argues it has a right to enrich uranium for a civilian nuclear power program, but suspicion persists that the real aim is nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic hid much of its nuclear program until it was revealed from the outside more than a decade ago. And defying UN Security Council demands that it halt uranium enrichment, Iran has instead expanded it.

“Iran should not wait any longer to take up the willingness Vice President Biden has stressed to hold substantial negotiations on its nuclear program,” said Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle of Germany, whose country has been one of those trying to resolve the issue. He added that 2013 would be “decisive” for hopes of a diplomatic solution.

“From our point of view, announcing an accelerated expansion of uranium enrichment in Iran is the wrong signal,” Westerwelle said.

Biden underlined that “our policy is not containment — it is to prevent Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.”

The conference — an annual gathering of top security officials — also gave Biden an opportunity to address the civil war in Syria. He planned to hold separate meetings with Lavrov, international peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, and Syria’s top opposition leader, Moaz al-Khatib. Russia is a longtime ally of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

Biden stressed the conviction of the US and many others that “President Assad — a tyrant hell-bent on clinging to power — is no longer fit to lead the Syrian people and he must go.” He said that “the opposition continues to grow stronger.”

Despite differences, “we can all agree on the increasingly deep plight of the Syrian people and the responsibility of the international community to address that plight,” he told an audience that included Lavrov.

But Lavrov fired back that “there are a lot of question marks about the Western approaches to those developments,” in the region, asking whether supporting antigovernment protesters justified terrorists, and questioning when it is “permissible to cooperate with regimes and when is it legitimate to argue for their removal.”

“We are all interested in the stability of the Mideast and the African continent,” and for governments to be democratic and peaceful, Lavrov said. “If we agree on these common objectives we could probably agree on some transparent and common rules for all actors to follow.”

Lavrov also suggested Biden’s statement that Assad must go was counterproductive.

“The persistence of those who say that priority number one is the removal of President Assad — I think it’s the single biggest reason for the continued tragedy in Syria.”

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.

Biden: U.S. prepared to hold direct talks with Iran only if regime ‘is serious’

February 2, 2013

Biden: U.S. prepared to hold direct talks with Iran only if regime ‘is serious’ – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

U.S. Vice president says Iran must prove it is negotiating in good faith; ‘our policy is not containment – it is to prevent Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.’

 

By | Feb.02, 2013 | 1:26 PM | 3U.S. Vice President Joe Biden.

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden gestures during his speech at the Security Conference in Munich, southern Germany, February 2, 2013. Photo by AP

 

The United States is prepared to hold direct talks with Iran in the standoff over its nuclear ambitions, Vice President Joe Biden said Saturday – but he insisted that Tehran must show it is serious and Washington won’t engage in such talks “just for the exercise.”

 

Washington has indicated in the past that it’s prepared to talk directly with Iran, and talks involving all five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany have made little headway. Several rounds of international sanctions have cut into Iran’s oil sales and financial transactions.

 

Last month Iran, in a defiant move ahead of a new round of talks expected soon with the six powers, announced plans to vastly increase its pace of uranium enrichment. That can be used to make both reactor fuel and the fissile core of warheads.

 

Biden told an international security conference that “there is still time, there is still space for diplomacy backed by pressure to succeed.” He did not specify any timeframe.

 

He insisted that “the ball is in the government of Iran’s court” to show that it’s negotiating in good faith.

 

Asked when Washington might hold direct talks with Tehran, Biden replied: “when the Iranian leadership, the supreme leader (Ayatollah Ali Khamenei), is serious.”

 

The U.S. has long made clear that it is prepared to meet directly with the Iranian leadership, he added – “that offer stands but it must be real and tangible and there has to be an agenda that they’re prepared to speak to.”

 

“We’re not prepared to do it just for the exercise,” Biden told the Munich Security Conference.

 

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, whose country is a key player in the six-nation talks with Iran, said he “would strongly support what Vice President Biden said about the need for incentives to be clearly shown to Iran.”

 

“We have to convince Iran that it is not about the regime change,” he said.

 

Iran insists it does not want nuclear arms and argues it has a right to enrich uranium for a civilian nuclear power program, but suspicion persists that the real aim is nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic hid much of its nuclear program until it was revealed from the outside more than a decade ago. And defying UN Security Council demands that it halt uranium enrichment, Iran has instead expanded it.

 

“Iran should not wait any longer to take up the willingness Vice President Biden has stressed to hold substantial negotiations on its nuclear program,” said Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle of Germany, whose country has been one of those trying to resolve the issue. He added that 2013 would be “decisive” for hopes of a diplomatic solution.

 

“From our point of view, announcing an accelerated expansion of uranium enrichment in Iran is the wrong signal,” Westerwelle said.

 

Biden underlined that “our policy is not containment – it is to prevent Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.”

 

The conference – an annual gathering of top security officials – also gave Biden an opportunity to address the civil war in Syria. He planned to hold separate meetings with Lavrov, international peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, and Syria’s top opposition leader, Moaz al-Khatib. Russia is a longtime ally of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

 

Biden stressed the conviction of the U.S. and many others that “President Assad – a tyrant hell-bent on clinging to power – is no longer fit to lead the Syrian people and he must go.” He said that “the opposition continues to grow stronger.”

 

Despite differences, “we can all agree on the increasingly deep plight of the Syrian people and the responsibility of the international community to address that plight,” he told an audience that included Lavrov.

 

But Lavrov fired back that “there are a lot of question marks about the Western approaches to those developments,” in the region, asking whether supporting antigovernment protesters justified terrorists, and questioning when it is “permissible to cooperate with regimes and when is it legitimate to argue for their removal.”

 

“We are all interested in the stability of the Mideast and the African continent,” and for governments to be democratic and peaceful, Lavrov said. “If we agree on these common objectives we could probably agree on some transparent and common rules for all actors to follow.”

 

Lavrov also suggested Biden’s statement that Assad must go was counterproductive.

 

“The persistence of those who say that priority number one is the removal of President Assad – I think it’s the single biggest reason for the continued tragedy in Syria.”

Is Turkey urging Syria to retaliate Israeli strike?

February 2, 2013

Is Turkey urging Syria to retaliate Israeli strike? – Israel News, Ynetnews.

En route to conference in presence of Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Turkish foreign minister slams Syria’s inaction after alleged Israeli strike: Why can’t Assad do anything against Israel?; , says his country will not stand by when a Muslim country is attacked

Ynet

Published: 02.02.13, 13:57 / Israel News

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu slammed Israel’s alleged strike in Syria, urging Damascus to retaliate, the Hurriyet news agency reported.

“Why didn’t (Bashar) Assad even throw a pebble when Israeli jets were flying over his palace and playing with the dignity of his country?” Davutoglu told reporters Saturday on his way to an international conference on Syria in Munich, which Defense Minister Ehud Barak is also expected to attend.

“Why didn’t the Syrian Army, which has been attacking its own innocent people for 22 months now from the air with jets and by land with tanks and artillery fire, respond to Israel’s operation? Why can’t Assad, who gave order to fire SCUD missiles at Aleppo, do anything against Israel?” Davutoglu added.

The foreign minister suggested there might exist a collaborative conspiracy between Israel and Assad’s regime. “Is there a secret agreement between Assad and Israel? The Assad regime only abuses. Why don’t you use the same power that you use against defenseless women against Israel, which you have seen as an enemy since its foundation,” he said.

The Turkish Minister insisted that Turkey will not stand by as Israel attacks a Muslim country.

On Friday, the American TIME magazine reported that Israeli warplanes struck several targets inside Syria in an alleged raid Tuesday night, including a biological weapons research center that was reportedly flattened out of concern that it might fall into the hands of Islamist extremists fighting to topple the government of the Syrian president.

A variety of news organizations reported that Israeli jets hit a convoy carrying advanced anti-aircraft defense systems toward Lebanon’s Beqaa Valley, presumably for delivery to Hezbollah.

‘Turkish FM slams Israel for strikes, Syria for inaction’

February 2, 2013

‘Turkish FM slams Israel for stri… JPost – Diplomacy & Politics.

( Wow… This goes beyond the usual self parody… Through the looking glass. .. Turkey begged for and received NATO patriots to defend against Assad.  Now Turkey attacks Assad for NOT attacking Israel.  Oh, and throws in a “conspiracy theory” for good measure.  I think it’s time NATO booted a country that claims to be more extreme than Assad. – JW )

By JPOST.COM STAFF
02/02/2013 14:19
Davutoglu questions why Assad didn’t “throw a pebble when Israeli jets were playing with the dignity of his country,” suggests failure to respond is due to “secret agreement” with Israel, according to ‘The Hurriyet.’

Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu in Greece

Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu in Greece Photo: REUTERS

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on Saturday slammed both Israel for reported strikes in Syria earlier in the week, as well as Syria for its failure to respond to the attacks, Turkish daily The Hurriyet reported.

“Why didn’t [Bashar] Assad even throw a pebble when Israeli jets were flying over his palace and playing with the dignity of his country?” The Hurriyet quoted Davutoglu as saying.

“Why didn’t the Syrian Army, which has been attacking its own innocent people for 22 months now from the air with jets and by land with tanks and artillery fire, respond to Israel’s operation? Why can’t Assad, who gave order to fire SCUD missiles at Aleppo, do anything against Israel?” the foreign minister said to reporters.

He further suggested that Assad’s inaction was due to “a secret agreement” with Israel and vowed that Turkey would not sit still in the face of an Israel attack on any Muslim country.

Time magazine on Friday cited Western intelligence officials as saying that IAF raids overnight Tuesday struck multiple targets in Syria.

Syria on Wednesday publicly accused Israel of striking a scientific research center northwest of Damascus, denying reports that the strike had targeted a suspected shipment of anti-aircraft missiles en route to Hezbollah in Lebanon. The description of the military research center that Syria claimed the IAF jets targeted fits the definition of Syria’s Scientific Studies and Research Center, which has been labeled a state organization responsible for developing biological and chemical weapons and transferring them to Hezbollah and Hamas.

Time quoted a Western intelligence official as saying that the IAF had targeted at least one or two more targets overnight Tuesday and that the US has given Israel a green light to carry out additional strikes.

Panetta suggests Washington fully backs Israeli strike on Syria

February 2, 2013

Panetta suggests Washington fully backs Israeli strike on Syria | The Times of Israel.

Outgoing US defense secretary says US intent on preventing transfer of sophisticated weapons to terrorists, warns of Iran’s export of manpads

February 2, 2013, 7:34 am Updated: February 2, 2013,US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta attends a ceremony in Lima, Peru, last October (photo credit: AP/Martin Mejia/File)

US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta attends a ceremony in Lima, Peru, last October (photo credit: AP/Martin Mejia/File)

In two interviews on Friday, outgoing US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said that the US fears instability in Syria could enable Hezbollah to obtain sophisticated weapons from Damascus, and warned of Iran’s attempts to destabilize the Middle East.

He referred to the reported Israeli strike on Syria earlier this week week — in which several targets, including an arms convoy believed to be heading to Lebanon, were allegedly hit by Israeli jets — and suggested that Washington “fully backed the move,” AFP reported.

“The chaos in Syria has obviously created an environment where the possibility of these weapons, you know, going across the border and falling into the hands of Hezbollah has become a greater concern,” Panetta said.

“Without discussing the communications that we have on a regular basis with Israel or the specifics of that operation, because that’s something they know more about,” the defense secretary added, confirming that it was in fact Israel who conducted the strike, “we have expressed the concern that we have to do everything we can to make sure that sophisticated weapons like SA-17 missiles or, for that matter chemical biological weapons, do not fall into the hands of terrorists,” he said.

TIME magazine reported Friday that the US was prepared to carry out raids of its own in the Aleppo area if it feared rebels might otherwise gain control of weapons of mass destruction in that area of Syria.

On Wednesday, US officials told The New York Times that Israel had notified the United States about an airstrike it carried out overnight Tuesday near the Lebanese-Syrian border. The officials said that they believed the target of the strike was a convoy carrying sophisticated anti-aircraft weaponry intended to reach Hezbollah forces in Lebanon.

An unnamed Western official told the Wall Street Journal that the convoy was carrying sophisticated Russian-made SA-17 anti-aircraft weapons, which could constitute a strategic game-changer were Hezbollah to possess them.

A former Syrian general said Friday that the facility reportedly struck by Israel produced non-conventional weapons, in addition to conventional arms. Maj. Gen. Adnan Sillu was previously in charge of the country’s chemical weapons training program.

Israel has yet to confirm or even officially comment on Tuesday’s alleged air raid.

During an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Panetta called Iran’s export of manpads — anti-aircraft missiles that can be carried by one person and that pose significant risks to airlines and military planes — an escalation.

“There is no question when you start passing manpads around, that becomes a threat, not just to military aircraft but to civilian aircraft,” Panetta said. “That is an escalation.”

Recent US intelligence has pointed to the Islamic Regime’s efforts to smuggle the manpads, such as a January 23-shipment of such weaponry, including surface-to-air missiles, that was intercepted by Yemen with US assistance.

“It’s one of the first times we have seen it,” Panetta told the newspaper.

The Pentagon chief said the US is stepping up its efforts to curb the threat emanating from Iran. He cited a planned February 7 multi-national exercise in the United Arab Emirates that would improve the ability of the Gulf states to halt Iranian arms transfers in the region.