Archive for February 2013

Netanyahu urges “military sanctions” threat against Iran – Yahoo! News UK

February 27, 2013

Netanyahu urges “military sanctions” threat against Iran

ReutersReuters – 1 hour 45 minutes ago

 

JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged the international community on Wednesday to threaten Iran with “military sanctions”, saying economic measures are failing to curb Tehran’s nuclear drive.

“I believe it is incumbent upon the international community to intensify the sanctions and clarify that if Iran continues its programme, there will be military sanctions,” Netanyahu said.

He did not, in a statement released by the prime minister’s office, specify what military measures he envisages.

“I don’t think there are any other means that will make Iran heed the international community’s demands,” he said, in his first remarks on the issue after two days of nuclear talks between Tehran and world powers in the Kazakh city of Almaty.

Netanyahu has long said that only a credible military threat, coupled with tough economic sanctions, could dissuade Iran from acquiring what Israel and the West believe is a capability to build atomic weapons.

Iran says it is enriching uranium for peaceful purposes only.

In Almaty, the first negotiations between Iran and six world powers in eight months ended without a breakthrough on Wednesday. They agreed to meet again at expert level in Istanbul next month and resume political talks in Kazakhstan on April 5.

Israel, widely believed to be the Middle East’s only nuclear-armed power, has strongly hinted it might attack Iran if diplomacy and sanctions fail to halt its nuclear programme.

Netanyahu, setting a “red line” at the United Nations last September, has said Iran could by the middle of this year reach the point where it has enriched enough uranium to move quickly toward building an atomic bomb.

(Writing by Jeffrey Heller, Editing by Ori Lewis)

via Netanyahu urges “military sanctions” threat against Iran – Yahoo! News UK.

Report: Nasrallah’s deputy hurt in Syria explosion – Israel News, Ynetnews

February 27, 2013

Report: Nasrallah’s deputy hurt in Syria explosion

Published: 02.27.13, 13:01 / Israel News

Lebanon’s al-Mustaqbal newspaper, affiliated with the anti-Hezbollah camp, quoted the Free Syria Army as saying that Naim Qassem, Hezbollah’s second in command, was injured in a convoy explosion together with several high ranking Syrian officers.

The report was not confirmed by other sources. On Tuesday, the rebels reported they attacked a Hezbollah convoy of senior officers in the outskirts of Damascus. (Roi Kais)

via Report: Nasrallah’s deputy hurt in Syria explosion – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Iran hails ‘more realistic’ nuclear talks | SBS World News

February 27, 2013

Iran hails ‘more realistic’ nuclear talks27 Feb 2013, 9:28 pm – Source: AAPShare This0 0 0 The world powers are offering Iran permission to resume its gold and precious metals trade as well as some international banking activity which are currently under sanctions, Western officials told AFP. AAPThe world powers are offering Iran permission to resume its gold and precious metals trade as well as some international banking activity which are currently under sanctions, Western officials told AFP. AAPIran’s chief negotiator says world powers are taking a “more realistic” approach to the nuclear stand-off.RELATED Offers exchanged at Iran nuclear talks Iran selects 16 nuclear sites Iran installing new nuclear equipment: UNWorld powers are taking a “more realistic” approach to the Iranian nuclear stand-off, Tehran’s chief negotiator said, announcing a resumption of talks in March and then at a higher level in April.”Some of the points raised in their the world powers’ response were more realistic comparing to what they said in the past,” Saeed Jalili told reporters after two days of talks wound down over the decade-old nuclear impasse in the Kazakh city of Almaty.He said all sides agreed to meet in the same city on April 5-6 after first gathering their nuclear experts for consultations in Istanbul in March.”It was agreed to convene an expert level meeting in Istanbul on March 18, which would be followed by the 5+1 meeting with Iran on April 5-6 in Almaty,” Jalili told reporters.The world powers offered Iran to ease some of the sanctions imposed against it in exchange for some curbs on uranium enrichment that the powers believe Iran is pursuing to develop a nuclear bomb.Jalili said he viewed the overall tenor of the meeting as “positive.””We consider these talks as a positive step which could be completed by taking a positive and constructive approach and taking reciprocal steps,” he said.Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov confirmed Iran and world powers will hold their next talks over the Iranian nuclear crisis in Istanbul on March 17-18 at an expert level.The expert-level meetings usually involve senior civil servants ranking below the top negotiators from both sides.

via Iran hails ‘more realistic’ nuclear talks | SBS World News.

After talks end, Netanyahu calls for ‘military sanctions’ on Iran

February 27, 2013

After talks end, Netanyahu calls for ‘military sanctions’ on Iran | The Times of Israel.

Prime minister says credible threat needed after world powers unable to reach agreement with Tehran; John Kerry calls talks useful

February 27, 2013, 5:47 pm
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking earlier this month. (photo credit: Dave Bender, Jewish Agency for Israel)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking earlier this month. (photo credit: Dave Bender, Jewish Agency for Israel)

The international community should threaten Iran with “military sanctions” if the regime doesn’t stop pursuing its nuclear program, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Wednesday, after another round of talks between six world super powers and Tehran ended without tangible progress.

“We have the problem of Iran that is continuing to defy the international community, doesn’t seem to seek an end to its military nuclear program,” he said during a meeting with Sri Lankan Foreign Minister G.L. Peiris in Jerusalem. “Like North Korea, it continues to defy all the international standards and I believe that this requires the international community to ratchet up its sanctions and make clear that if this continues there will be also a credible military sanction. I think no other means will make Iran obey the wishes of the international community.”

Earlier on Wednesday, a fourth round of negotiations between Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Germany ended in Kazakhstan. The so-called P5+1 offered Tehran a “revised proposal, which we believe is balanced and a fair basis for constructive talks,” the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton, said after the talks.

However, the meeting’s only concrete result was an agreement that technical experts from both sides will meet in Istanbul on March 18 and then again, with the P5+1 political officials, on April 5 in Kazakhstan.

US Secretary of State John Kerry said Wednesday the talks had been useful and left the door open for future bilateral talks between Washington and Tehran.

“Iran knows what it needs to do. The president has made clear his determination to implement his policy that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon,” Kerry said, according to Reuters.

UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said he looked forward to “further progress by experts in March on the revised and credible proposal” the P5+1 put to Iran.

“It is vital that progress is now made on addressing our most immediate concerns about Iran’s nuclear program,” Hague said. “Iran has much to gain from a diplomatic resolution to the nuclear issue and we are clear on the need for talks to deliver results.”

Hague said the most recent report by the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran continues to expand its enrichment capacity and has failed to cooperate with its demands. Therefore, “Iran must show it is prepared to take the urgent action needed to address the international community’s serious concerns,” he said.

‘Ahmadinejad set to challenge Iran’s ayatollahs’

February 27, 2013

‘Ahmadinejad set to challenge Iran’s ayatollahs’ | The Times of Israel.

( Please join me in wishing the protagonists in this drama complete success in their mutual endeavor to destroy the other.  To both sides: GO ! GO ! – JW )

Iranian president and his would-be successor aim to ‘dismantle the theocratic structure of the Iranian government,’ report says

February 27, 2013, 2:10 pm
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad flashes the victory sign as he attends the 12th summit of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in Cairo, Egypt, Wednesday, Feb. 6 (Photo credit: AP/Amr Nabil)

Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad flashes the victory sign as he attends the 12th summit of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in Cairo, Egypt, Wednesday, Feb. 6 (Photo credit: AP/Amr Nabil)

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is planning an “extraordinary attack” on the political power of Iran’s clerics in an attempt to “separate mosque and state,” the Times of London reported.

Ahmadinejad, whose second and final presidential term ends in August, and his chief of staff and would-be-successor, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, intend to “effectively dismantle the theocratic structure of Iranian government that has stood since the revolution,” if Mashaei proves able to win the upcoming presidential election, Tuesday’s report said.

Mashaei, who is regarded as an opponent of the religious establishment, reportedly said during a recent planning meeting that he has “the deepest respect for the clerics, but they are not politicians. Their presence is damaging Iranian politics. Their role should be spiritual only. In the next four years we have an opportunity to change the constitution.” The quote was cited by an anonymous source who told the paper that Mashaei’s “implication was clear — he was endorsing a separation of mosque and state.”

Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei (photo credit: CC BY Kremlin.ru, Wikipedia)

Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei (photo credit: CC BY Kremlin.ru, Wikipedia)

However, winning the presidency in the June elections will not be an easy task for Mashaei. The list of candidates must be approved by a council controlled by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, whose relationship with the Ahmadinejad administration has been strained at the best of times and who is expected to support a candidate of his own choosing.

Even if Mashaei is approved to stand for election, he is not a nationally known figure and his close ties to Ahmadinejad could be detrimental to his chances.

Iran, West wrap up latest round of nuke talks

February 27, 2013

Iran, West wrap up latest round of nuke talks | The Times of Israel.

Russia confirms Tehran was offered eased sanctions, says new round of negotiations will take place in early April
February 27, 2013, 12:30 pm
Iran's heavy water nuclear facilities near the central city of Arak 150 miles (250 kilometers) southwest of Tehran. (photo credit: AP/ISNA,Hamid Foroutan, File)

Iran’s heavy water nuclear facilities near the central city of Arak 150 miles (250 kilometers) southwest of Tehran. (photo credit: AP/ISNA,Hamid Foroutan, File)

A Western official on Wednesday said the latest round of talks between world powers and Iran over Tehran’s nuclear program have ended.

It was not immediately clear what, if anything, was resolved during the two days of negotiations that ended Wednesday.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov confirmed that the West had offered to ease sanctions on Iran if the Islamic Republic agreed to limit uranium enrichment to below 20 percent, “a short technical step from weapons grade,” Reuters reported.

Technical experts from both sides will meet in Istanbul in the coming weeks to discuss the latest proposals, Iranian state TV reported. The Istanbul meeting will be conducted March 17-18, while another round of negotiations is scheduled for April 5-6, Ryabkov was quoted as saying.

Iran’s top negotiator, Saeed Jalili, and EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton were expected to talk to reporters later.

The Obama administration is pushing for diplomacy to solve the impasse but has not ruled out the possibility of military intervention in Iran to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

“Our proposal includes reciprocal measures that encourage Iran to make concrete steps,” US Secretary of State John Kerry told reporters in Berlin on Tuesday. “My hope is Iran will make its choice to move down the path to a diplomatic solution.”

Israel has threatened it will use all means to stop Iran from being able to build a bomb, potentially as soon as this summer, raising the specter of a possible Mideast war.

In Jerusalem, former foreign minister Avigdor Liberman called Tuesday on the international community to take more “significant” steps to dislodge Iran from its nuclear program. Liberman, who is acting head of the Knesset’s influential Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, did not elaborate.

“Sanctions alone will not be enough to rein in those same extremists from their goal to achieve nuclear capabilities and the time has come to move toward steps that are much more significant than the talks and sanctions that we’ve seen to date,” said Liberman.

Off-and-on talks between Iran and the world powers — the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany — began after the six offered Tehran a series of incentives in 2006 in exchange for a commitment from Tehran to stop enrichment and other activities that could be used to make weapons.

Talks with Iran

February 27, 2013

Editorial: Talks with Iran – JPost – Opinion – Editorials.

By JPOST EDITORIAL
02/26/2013 21:10
The military option, which still “remains on the table,” may ultimately be the only effective way of halting the Iranians’ stubborn march toward their goal of nuclear weapons.

Demonstrators wave Iran's flag, February 11, 2012

Demonstrators wave Iran’s flag, February 11, 2012 Photo: REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi
Iranian officials were in a decidedly defiant mood ahead of talks Tuesday in Almaty, Kazakhstan, with negotiators representing the P5 + 1 – the US, Russia, China, Britain, Germany and France.“If they want constructive negotiations, it’s better this time they come with a new strategy and credible proposals,” Saeed Jalili, the top Iranian nuclear negotiator, told reporters before he left for Almaty.Iranian officials were continuing their long record of intransigence. Last week they turned down a Western proposal to gradually lift sanctions on trading in gold in return for the closing of a mountain bunker enrichment facility called Fordow. The officials said the site would never be closed because it afforded protection against attacks, particularly from the “Zionist regime.”And the Islamic Republic continues to move ahead with its nuclear program. Just last week, inspectors from the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency counted nearly 200 advanced machines fully or partially installed at Iran’s main uranium enrichment site, confirming fears that Tehran continues to upgrade its nuclear program to the point where it will have nuclear arms capability.

Indeed, since the last talks between Iran and the P5+1 in Moscow last June, the Mullah regime has continued to increase its stockpile of uranium to 20 percent purity.

The total stockpile of 20% enriched uranium has grown to 167 kilograms, according to the IAEA, still below the 240 to 250 kilograms experts consider necessary – once enriched further – to produce nuclear weapons.

In addition, the Iranians have yet to complete an agreement on inspection of suspect military sites with the IAEA. In February 2010, the IAEA stated for the first time bluntly that Iran was indeed actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability.

The P5+1’s objective is to get Iran to obey UN Security Council resolutions ordering it to suspend enrichment and open itself up fully to IAEA inspectors, to ensure there is no effort to build a nuclear weapon.

Attempts to get Iran to comply via dialogue are doomed to failure. In October, ahead of the US presidential elections, The New York Times reported that the US and Iran had agreed to direct negotiations. But Iran has since rejected such an option.

The mullah regime is so antagonistic to the “Big Satan” that even Michelle Obama’s announcement of Argo as the Best Picture winner by video at the Oscars was spun as a direct affront to the Islamic Republic. The Revolutionary Guard-affiliated Fars news agency, which edited the photo to cover up the first lady’s shoulders, went out of its way to attack Obama for announcing the “anti-Iran film which is produced by the Zionist company Warner Bros.” The Iranian government even organized a conference to discuss the ideology behind films like Argo, and their use in promoting an anti-Iranian, Islamophobic agenda.

With dialogue unlikely to lead to a breakthrough, the Security Council, the US and the EU have created an increasingly painful set of economic sanctions. Just this week in a bipartisan effort, the US Congress called on the European Central Bank to sharply tighten its sanctions regime against the Islamic Republic by denying Iran access to Euro-denominated foreign exchange reserves.

In a letter, 36 senators, including Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee and 2016 Republican hopeful Marco Rubio, called on the ECB to stop Iran from using the “Target2” clearing system for global Euro transactions.

Iran’s use of Target2 was enabling it to circumvent new sanction rules that came into force on February 6, forcing Tehran to keep the proceeds of all oil sales in local currencies.

Yet despite their deteriorating economy, Iran remains defiant as it prepares for elections in June. Ayatollah Khamenei, the Islamic Republic’s supreme spiritual bully, vowed that his nation would never back down.

“If the Iranian people had wanted to surrender to the Americans, they would not have carried out a revolution,” Khamenei said in a meeting at his home earlier this month that was broadcast by the Iranian news media.

Unfortunately, the military option, which still “remains on the table,” may ultimately be the only effective way of halting the Iranians’ stubborn march toward their goal of nuclear weapons.

Israel warns Iran just buying time in Kazakhstan

February 27, 2013

Israel warns Iran just buying ti… JPost – Iranian Threat – News.

02/26/2013 23:07
J’lem “skeptical to the extreme” over Iranian claims it is prepared to make offer to major powers in talks on nuclear program.

Participants sit at a table during talks on Iran's nuclear program in Almaty

Participants sit at a table during talks on Iran’s nuclear program in Almaty Photo: REUTERS/Stanislav Filippov

Israeli officials on Tuesday dismissed as a “ploy” claims by Iran that it was prepared to make an offer to the major powers during talks in Kazakhstan, after the US proposed limited sanctions relief in return for a halt to the Islamic Republic’s most controversial nuclear work.

Tuesday marked the first meeting in eight months between Iran and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany – the P5+1. Three rounds of talks last year – in Istanbul, Moscow and Baghdad – led to no progress, and Iran has used the last eight months to expand its uranium enrichment activity.

A second day of talks in Almaty, Kazakhstan, is expected Wednesday.

Although “skeptical in the extreme” that the current round would lead to any progress, Israeli officials were careful not to say that the talks were a mistake or counterproductive.

“The Iranian strategy is clear: to draw out diplomacy and continue to engage, but in parallel to continue enriching uranium,” one official said. “They are engaged in a consistent strategy to draw out the talks. Their ultimate goal is to keep talking, and one day to surprise the world with nuclear tests.”

The official reiterated that for Israel what was important was not the means to the end – that Iran not be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons – but rather the end result itself.

With that, he said, diplomacy has so far not been effective, sanctions are not working and the Iranians are galloping ahead despite diplomatic pressure.

Jerusalem, the official said, believes the pressure has to be dramatically upgraded, coupled with convincing the Iranians that there is a credible military option. He said the international community must also clearly state what the “or else” part of the “stop the bomb or else” equation is.

Yisrael Beytenu leader Avigdor Liberman, the new chairman of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, wished the P5+1 luck in their talks with the Iranians.

But, he said, “we have no illusions about Iran’s intentions to drag out the process and waste time.”

Liberman then called for the powers to take “more practical steps” to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

“The international community must rely on its experience with North Korea and understand that sanctions alone are not enough,” he said.

With the Islamic Republic’s political elite preoccupied with worsening infighting before a presidential election in June, Israeli officials are not the only ones doubting the meeting will yield a quick breakthrough.

“It is clear that nobody expects to come from Almaty with a fully done deal,” a spokesman for EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who oversees contacts with Iran on behalf of the world powers, said shortly after talks started.

A US official said on Monday that the powers’ updated offer to Iran – a modified version of one rejected by Iran last year – would take into account its recent nuclear advances, but would also take “some steps in the sanctions arena.”

This would address some of Iran’s concerns but not meet tions be lifted, the official said.

In Almaty, a source close to the Iranian negotiating team said on Tuesday that Iran would put up a counterproposal.

“Depending on what proposal we receive from the other side, we will present our own proposal of the same weight,” the source told reporters. “The continuation of talks depends on how this exchange of proposals goes forward.”

At best, diplomats and analysts say, Iran will take the joint offer from the US, Russia, France, Germany, Britain and China seriously and agree to hold further talks soon on practical steps to ease the tension.

“We are looking for flexibility from the Iranians,” said Ashton’s spokesman, Michael Mann.

But Iran, whose chief negotiator Saeed Jalili is close to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and is a veteran of Iran’s 1980s war against Iraq and the Western powers that backed it, has shown no sign of willingness to scale back its nuclear work. Tehran refuses to close its underground Fordow enrichment plant, a condition the powers have set for any sanctions relief.

A UN nuclear watchdog report last week said Iran was for the first time installing advanced centrifuges that would allow it to significantly speed up its enrichment of uranium, which can have both civilian and military purposes.

Tightening Western sanctions on Iran over the last 14 months are hurting Iran’s economy, slashing oil revenue and driving the currency down, which in turn has pushed up inflation.

The central bank governor was quoted on Monday as saying Iran’s inflation was likely to top 30 percent in coming weeks as the sanctions contribute to shortages and stockpiling.

But analysts say they are not close to having the crippling effect envisaged by Washington and – so far at least – they have not prompted a change in Iran’s nuclear course.

Israeli officials maintain there is room to “dramatically upgrade” the sanctions.

Western officials said the powers’ offer would include an easing of sanctions on trade in gold and other precious metals if Tehran closes Fordow.

The facility is used for enriching uranium to 20% fissile purity, a short technical step from weapons-grade.

Iran’s stockpile of highergrade uranium has grown to about 167 kg., an increase of roughly 18 kg. since mid- November. While the pile is still approaching the level of 240 kg. that Israel has set as its “red line,” the growth rate has slowed sharply.

The news website Al Monitor said on Tuesday that the powers’ offer could also include some relief for the petrochemical industry and in banking. Officials present in Almaty declined to comment on the report.

The fact that the meeting is taking place in Kazakhstan – which gave up its nuclear arsenal after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s – has symbolic resonance. A US official said the Central Asian state could serve as a “role model” for the benefits of making “certain choices.”

What will Chuck Hagel do about Iran’s plutonium production at Arak?

February 27, 2013

What will Chuck Hagel do about Iran’s plutonium production at Arak?.

DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis February 27, 2013, 6:38 AM (GMT+02:00)

 

Iran's heavy water plant at Arak
Iran’s heavy water plant at Arak

Chuck Hagel was swept into office Tuesday, Feb. 26 by a Senate majority as Barack Obama’s new defense secretary atop a cloud of disinformation which aimed to confirm that Iran’s nuclear program has gone too far to stop – like Iran’s grip on Syria and Lebanon. This message was accentuated by what the London Telegraph called Iran’s Plan B, signified by “…a cloud of steam that indicates heavy-water production for… a nuclear reactor that can produce plutonium, which could then be used to make a bomb.”

debkafile: The “cloud of steam” is no proof of an active plant; it could be just a trial run, but the timing of the British paper’s publication on the day of Hagel’s Senate endorsement and the Six-Power meeting with Iran in Kazkahstan to discuss its nuclear program, underscored the view of British Prime Minister David Cameron. He has said in private conversations that US President Obama, French President Francois Hollande and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu are pursuing an unrealistic policy on Iran and should accept the reality that Iran has achieved a nuclear bomb capacity. Sanctions are therefore pointless and futile and should be lifted.
The point contributed by the Telegraph – for the benefit of the incoming US defense secretary – was that Iran has achieved a dual track to an atomic bomb, which only goes to strengthen Cameron’s argument.

Just as unrealistically, the Kazakhstan talks focused on curtailing Iran’s uranium enrichment up to weapons grade, while Tehran was creeping up on the six powers (US, UK, France, Russia, China and Germany) with its Plan B for producing a plutonium bomb.
It must also be said that the Arak plant and Iran’s plan for a plutonium weapon have been around for some time and were only brought into play now to support these arguments..
As for the rumors of Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah coming down with cancer and being flown to a hospital in Tehran – broadcast Tuesday, Feb. 26 – even assuming they were confirmed – prove nothing. HIzballah in fact strenuously denied the rumor Tuesday night.
If Nasrallah were to disappear tomorrow, Hizballah’s military, political, intelligence and terrorist arms,which are managed totally by Tehran, would simply carry on as before in Lebanon and Syria. And whatever fate may overtake even Syrian President Bashar Assad, Iran is too deeply entrenched in both countries to be dislodged.
The rumors of Nasrallah’s terminal illness come one month after the assassination of Gen. Hassan Shateri aka Hossam Khosh-Nevis, who was Iran’s overlord for Syria and Lebanon. They look very much like an attempt to undermine morale in Damascus and Beirut ahead of the March 5 negotiations opening in Moscow between the Assad regime and the Syrian opposition.
It is hardly likely that the Moscow-Tehran initiative for ending the Syrian war will be affected any more than images of a head of steam over Arak will halt Iran’s nuclear program.

Iran’s ‘Plan B’ for a nuclear bomb – Telegraph

February 27, 2013

Iran’s ‘Plan B’ for a nuclear bomb – Telegraph.

Iran is developing a second path to a nuclear weapons capability by operating a plant that could produce plutonium, satellite images show for the first time.

Water vapour, circled, is seen being emitted from forced air coolers at the Arak heavy water production plant earlier this month, showing that the facility is operational

Water vapour, circled, is seen being emitted from forced air coolers at the Arak heavy water production plant earlier this month, showing that the facility is operational Photo: DigitalGlobe Inc/McKenzie Intelligence Ltd

The Telegraph can disclose details of activity at a heavily-guarded Iranian facility from which international inspectors have been barred for 18 months.

The images, taken earlier this month, show that Iran has activated the Arak heavy-water production plant.

Heavy water is needed to operate a nuclear reactor that can produce plutonium, which could then be used to make a bomb.

The images show signs of activity at the Arak plant, including a cloud of steam that indicates heavy-water production.

Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency have been unable to visit the facility since August 2011 and Iran has refused repeated requests for information about the site, which is 150 miles south-west of the capital, Tehran.

Western governments and the IAEA have held information about activity at Arak for some time.

But today’s exclusive images are the first to put evidence of that activity into the public domain.

The details of Iran’s plutonium programme emerged as the world’s leading nations resumed talks with Tehran aimed at allaying fears over the country’s nuclear ambitions.

The new images also show details of the Fordow complex, which is concealed hundreds of feet beneath a mountain near the holy city of Qom. At talks in Kazakhstan yesterday, world leaders offered to relax sanctions on Iran in exchange for concessions over Fordow, which is heavily protected from aerial attack.

Iran insists that its nuclear facilities are for peaceful use, but Western governments fear that Tehran is seeking a nuclear weapon – or at least the ability to build one.

The striking image of steam over the Arak heavy-water complex is a vivid demonstration that the regime has more than one pathway to a potential nuclear weapon.

Previously, international talks on Iran’s nuclear programme have focused on the Islamic Republic’s attempts to enrich uranium at plants including Fordow.

But the new images of Arak highlight the progress Iran has made on facilities that could allow it to produce plutonium, potentially giving the country a second option in developing a nuclear weapon.

An Iranian bomb would allow the regime to

dissuade any Western challenge and extend its influence in the Middle East.

Israel fears that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose a mortal threat and encourage more attacks on its territory by Hizbollah militants.

Western intelligence agencies have made covert attempts to set back the

Iranian nuclear programme through sabotage. Some Israeli politicians want to go further and destroy Iran’s nuclear plants from the air before the country can build a bomb.

Other images of the area around Arak show that numerous anti-aircraft missile and artillery sites protect the plant, more than are deployed around any other known nuclear site in the country.

The missile defences are most heavily concentrated to the west of the plant, which would be the most direct line of approach for any aircraft delivering a long-range strike from Israel.

The Arak complex has two parts: the heavy-water plant and a nuclear reactor.

Unlike the heavy-water plant, the reactor has been opened to examination by inspectors from the IAEA. During a visit earlier this month, the inspectors noted that cooling and “moderator circuit” pipes at the reactor were “almost complete”.

Iran has told the IAEA that it will begin operating the reactor at Arak in the first three months of 2014.

The country still lacks the technology to reprocess plutonium and use it for a weapon.

But North Korea has successfully developed that technology, and some analysts speculate that Iran could do the same.

Mark Fitzpatrick, a former US State Department official at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, suggested that Arak could be part of a process that might trigger Western strikes on Iran.

One option for the Iranian regime would be to acquire the necessary reprocessing technology from North Korea, he said.

“By then, the option of a military strike on an operating reactor would present enormous complications because of the radiation that would be spread,” he explained.

“Some think Israel’s red line for military action is before Arak comes online.”

Amid growing concerns about the Iranian nuclear programme, The Daily Telegraph commissioned today’s images from commercial satellite operators. The Arak image was recorded on Feb 9.

The IAEA, which is responsible for inspecting Iran’s nuclear sites, says that its inspectors are forced to rely on similar satellite images to monitor Arak.

The Telegraph’s images were analysed by Stuart Ray of McKenzie Intelligence Services, a consultancy firm.

He said: “The steam indicates that the heavy-water plant is operational and the extent of the air defence emplacements around the site make it suspicious.”

Based on its own analysis of satellite images, the IAEA has reached a similar conclusion. In a report distributed to its board last week, the agency reported “ongoing construction” at the Arak site and active heavy water production.

According to the Institute for Science and International Security, a US think tank, if the heavy-water plant reaches full capacity, it would produce about 20lb of plutonium a year.

That could be enough for two nuclear warheads if the plutonium was reprocessed.