Archive for February 2013

Defense minister: Iran’s cruise, ballistic missiles capable of striking U.S. warships in region – Trend.Az

February 21, 2013

Defense minister: Iran’s cruise, ballistic missiles capable of striking U.S. warships in region

inShare2

Defense minister: Iran’s cruise, ballistic missiles capable of striking U.S. warships in region

18 February 2013, 17:52 (GMT+04:00)

See Also:

Iran’s Defense Minister threatens Israel

Iran to unveil new 1,000-3,000 km radars soon

Iran’s defense minister: Life of current hegemonic countries to end by 2035

China protests US sanctions on companies over alleged arms deals with Iran, North Korea, Syria

U.S. lists new Iran sanctions on several Chinese firms

Khamenei: Policy of U.S. in Middle East failed, so it wants to negotiate with Iran

Iran-US direct talks unavoidable

Iran FM spokesman: direct U.S. talks with sanctions and pressure are meaningless

E-mail.

Print.

Azerbaijan, Baku, Feb.18 / Trend S. Isayev/

Iran’s Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi said Iran’s cruise and ballistic missiles are capable of striking U.S. warships that are located in the regional waters, Fars news agency reported.

He noted that Iran’s deployment of anti-ship missiles on its Southern coast is a blow to U.S. strategic goals in the region.

Vahidi also stressed on the importance of Iran’s naval forces in securing the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz.

Previously Vahidi said that the Asian countries would rule the world after the hegemonic powers collapse.

“The countries that have naval and marine control, will take on major role in administration at the world arena,” he noted.

Vahidi noted that despite that the Western nations want to keep their domination over the international community, in the future Iran would play a strong role in the world, regarding its strategic position among the nations.

Do you have any feedback? Contact our journalist at agency@trend.az

via Defense minister: Iran’s cruise, ballistic missiles capable of striking U.S. warships in region – Trend.Az.

Nigeria nabs terrorists planning attacks on Israelis

February 21, 2013

Nigeria nabs terrorists planning attacks on Is… JPost – Defense.

By JPOST.COM STAFF
02/20/2013 23:05
Security forces arrest three members of an Iranian-linked terror cell allegedly planning to launch attack against Israelis.

People and traffic move along a busy street in Lagos, Nigeria, May 24,2005.

People and traffic move along a busy street in Lagos, Nigeria, May 24,2005. Photo: REUTERS
Nigerian security forces on Wednesday evening arrested three people belonging to an Iranian-linked terror cell that was reportedly planning to launch an attack against Israeli and American targets, Army Radio reported.

According to the report, the group planned attacks in the largest Jewish center in Nigeria, Lagos, as well as in American development agencies.

Army Radio reported Nigerian police are still searching for a fourth suspect.

Iran installs uranium enrichment accelerators

February 21, 2013

Iran installs uranium enrichment accelerators | The Times of Israel.

Diplomats say Tehran upgrading fissile material production, nearing ability to outfit nuclear warhead

February 20, 2013, 10:44 pm Updated: February 21, 2013, 12:34 am Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves to the crowd after speaking in Tehran on Saturday (photo credit: AP/Office of the Supreme Leader)

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves to the crowd after speaking in Tehran on Saturday (photo credit: AP/Office of the Supreme Leader)

VIENNA (AP) — In a disheartening signal to world powers at upcoming Iran talks, Tehran has started installing high-tech machines at its main uranium enrichment site that are capable of accelerating production of reactor fuel and — with further upgrading — the core of nuclear warheads, diplomats said Wednesday.

Iran already announced last week that it had begun mounting the new enriching centrifuges, but one diplomat said at the time that the announcement was premature with only a “small number” on site and not yet installed.

Diplomats told The Associated Press on Wednesday, however, that installation was now well on its way, with inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency seeing close to 100 or more machines mounted when they toured the site a few days ago. Depending on experts’ estimates, the new-generation centrifuges can enrich uranium three to five times faster than Iran’s present working model.

The Islamic Republic insists it is not working on a nuclear weapons program, but rather is enriching uranium only to make reactor fuel and for scientific and medical purposes — as allowed by international law.

But many nations are suspicious because Iran went underground after failing to get international help for its uranium enrichment program in the 1980s, working secretly until its activities were revealed a decade ago. More recent proposals for international shipments of reactor fuel in exchange for Iranian enrichment concessions have foundered, with each side blaming the other.

Shrugging off demands to mothball enrichment — and growing international sanctions — Iran has instead vastly expanded the program to where experts say it already has enough enriched uranium for several weapons if the material is further enriched.

The start of the centrifuge upgrade at Natanz, Iran’s main enrichment site southeast of Tehran, flies in the face of world-power efforts to induce Iran to scale back on enrichment. As such, it is likely to hurt chances of progress at Feb. 26 talks in Kazakhstan between the two sides — adding to a string of negotiating failures.

When Iran announced its intentions last month, Western diplomats downplayed the proclamation’s significance, noting Tehran did not say when it would start populating Natanz with the new machines. But any start of an upgrade is sure to increase international concerns, particularly if verified as expected in an IAEA report later this week.

The three diplomats speaking to the AP on Wednesday all are involved in the Vienna-based IAEA’s attempts to monitor Iran’s nuclear program. They demanded anonymity because they were not allowed to discuss confidential information.

Meeting Iran in Kazakhstan are the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany.

Russia and China often are at odds with the West on how harshly Iran’s nuclear activities should be censured, and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said recently that Iran was within its legal rights to install new generation centrifuges. At the same time, he called for a suspension of uranium enrichment during negotiations to improve the political atmosphere.

While moving to increase the potency of its enrichment program with the new centrifuges, however, Tehran also has recently resumed converting some of its higher-level enriched uranium at its Fordo enrichment site into reactor fuel plates after suspending the activity last year. That is likely to provide some reassurance to nations concerned about Iran’s nuclear aims because the plates are difficult to reconvert back into weapons usable material.

About 700 of the old machines at Fordo are churning out higher-enriched material that is still below — but just a technical step away — from weapons-grade uranium. Iran says it needs that higher-enriched level to fuel a research reactor

With higher-enriched uranium their immediate concern, the six powers over the past months have inched toward meeting Iranian demands of sanctions relief but say Tehran must first suspend its output at Fordo. Iran, in turn, wants sanctions eased before it commits to even a discussion of an enrichment cutback.

The diplomats said Iran was also upgrading its enrichment capabilities at Fordo but declined to provide further details ahead of the release of the IAEA report.

In first revealing plans to update last month, Iran indicated that It could add more than 3,000 of the new-generation centrifuges to the more than 10,000 older models it has at Natanz turning out enriched uranium at grades lower than at Fordo. The lower the grade, the harder it would be to turn into weapons-grade material.

Olli Heinonen, the former IAEA deputy director general in charge of Iran, told the AP last week that Iran could install 3,000 or more of the high-tech centrifuges at Natanz within six to nine months, assuming that Tehran had the material to make the machines.

Iran, in its dealings both with the six powers and the IAEA, has continually acted as if it were in the position of strength. On Saturday, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, asserted that his country was not seeking nuclear weapons, but that if Tehran intended to build them, “the US could in no way stop the Iranian nation.”

David Albright, whose Institute for Science and International Security is a source for the US government on proliferation issues, said Iran’s hopes that the new centrifuges could strengthen its hand at the Kazakhstan talks could backfire.

“Given the low expectations for negotiations during the next several months, Iran risks giving the impression to the West that it is racing to the bomb rather than strengthening its negotiating position,” he said Wednesday.

But analyst Yousaf Butt, professor and scientist-in-residence at the Monterey Institute of International Studies, said that — with Iran legally entitled to enrich —the six powers first “should consider rolling back some sanctions” if they want Iran to respond.

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.

Syria claims to down Israeli drone over Lebanon | The Times of Israel

February 21, 2013

Thursday, February 21, 2013 Adar 11, 5773 2:15 am IST Site updated 7 minutes ago About Us Send us content Get our newsletter The Jewish world’s fastest-growing news siteHome Israel & the Region Jewish Times Israel Inside Ops & Blogs The Jewish Planet Start-Up Israel Daily Edition SpotlightHome >Israel & the RegionSyria claims to down Israeli drone over LebanonEyewitnesses in the village of Deir Al-Ashayer report spotting burning wreckage fall from the skyBy Elhanan Miller and Ilan Ben Zion February 20, 2013, 10:17 pm 0 Email Print ShareAn Israeli drone Photo credit: Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash 90An Israeli drone Photo credit: Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash 90Related Topics drone Lebanon SyriaSyrian air defenses reportedly shot down an Israeli drone near the Syrian-Lebanese border, a Syrian news site reported Wednesday evening.Eyewitnesses were quoted by Damas Post saying they saw burning wreckage fall from the sky over the village of Yanta in eastern Lebanon, causing no damage.The event was not reported on Syria’s official news agency SANA. There was no immediate Israeli comment.A resident of Deir al-Ashayer posted on a local Facebook group shortly thereafter that he saw a surface to air missile fired from Syria, and that the aircraft crashed on the Lebanese side of the border.Earlier in the day the Lebanese government news agency reported Israeli warplanes conducting multiple overflights and “mock raids” over southern Lebanon.The Deir Al-Ashayer area is about 15 miles west of Damascus and not far from the site of a reported Israeli strike on a Syrian arms convoy near a research site last month.Israel has been keeping a close eye on the Lebanese-Syria border to watch for any attempt to transfer arms between Damascus and Lebanese terror group Hezbollah.

via Syria claims to down Israeli drone over Lebanon | The Times of Israel.

Thanks from all of us JW

February 20, 2013

I have to say that after helping with this site for a week,the workload is of unprecedented Scale,We should all take are hats off to J W,it puts a huge strain on his life,He has managed this site on his own for three years,Thank you “Joseph wouk” for your dedication and time,Enjoy your vacation in full, Cheers and a million loves to you ,N G  J FI

Beware: Obama’s Iran War Talk is Israel’s Suicide Walk – Op-Eds – Israel National News

February 20, 2013

Beware: Obama’s Iran War Talk is Israel’s Suicide Walk – Op-Eds – Israel National News.

Op-Ed: Beware: Obama’s Iran War Talk is Israel’s Suicide Walk

Published: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 7:08 AM
Obama has created for himself a perfect PR stunt to blame Israel for Iran getting nukes.

 

The Sunday Times recently, I believe, likely correctly framed Obama’s general plan for his upcoming Israel visit, when it wrote: “[US President] Barack Obama will visit Israel next month for the first time as US president armed with the outline of a deal balancing the promise of tougher American action against Iran with fresh Israeli overtures to the Palestinians.”

But unfortunately, Obama’s March 2013 game is exactly Obama’s May 2009 game when the new President Obama stated:
“[I]f there is a linkage between Iran and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, I personally believe it actually runs the other way. To the extent that we can make peace with the Palestinians – between the Palestinians and the Israelis – then I actually think it strengthens our hand in the international community in dealing with a potential Iranian threat.”

In essence, Obama wants to trade Obama’s empty “Iranian ‘war’ talk” for Israel’s “suicide ‘peace’ walk.” Obama will only making explicit what has been his implicit policy since 2009. Obama’s ‘West Bank for a US Iran attack’ “trade” is insane on its face, and should be rejected outright. Further, Obama’s very “linkage” of the Iran’s nukes with Israel coughing up a Palestinian State only means Obama intends to allow Iran to get nukes, and wants Israel to be the his “scapegoat” cover for the failure of Obama’s own catastrophic Iranian nuclear appeasement.

Obama’s Iran nuclear policy can be summed up as “Speak softly, and carry no stick.”

First, why is Obama’s “”talk” for “walk”” scam insane for Israel?

Simple, been there done that! The exact reason Bibi caved in 2009 to Obama and agreed to a settlement freeze on November 25, 2009 was that Bibi had, very likely, under-the-table agreed to Obama’s Iran-West Bank linkage. And where did that get Israel? Iran exponentially accelerated its U235 enrichment and Abbas infinitely escalated the Palestinian’s demands. So, Obama is doubling down on a lose-lose policy for Israel and a win-win for him.


Obama is doubling down on a lose-lose policy for Israel and a win-win for him.
In 2009, Obama made Bibi look like a ‘Booby’ and enabled Iran to enrich 1000s of kilograms of UF6 gas containing enriched U235 Uranium. In 2013, Bibi’s caving to Obama will give Iran just the window it needs to breakout with a nuke. Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, Iran gets a nuke.

Next, in short, Israel will be forced to immediately give up the concrete ‘West Bank Palestinian Arab State’, so Obama can jabber on with Iran for another 4 years with Iran. Great! So now, Iran only has to have Hamas lob chemical-tipped katyushas from Judea and Samaria into Tel Aviv in order to annihilate Israel, in addition to Iran having and delivering a nuke!

Net-net, Obama is really offering Israel “immediate suicide for bupkis.” (“Bupkis” mean “absolutely nothing” in Yiddish.) For even if Obama actually physically attacked Iran in return for a “Palestinian Arab West Bank state”, that state would still steal all of Israel’s water, and would still fire ball-bearing war-headed rockets into Ben Gurion airport.

So, it’s still Israeli suicide.

Third, Iran is the world’s problem, not Israel’s. Everyone in the Middle East but Middle East pundits knows that Iran’s nukes represent a greater immediate totally existential threat to Saudi Arabia.

So, Obama’s deal is a super lose-lose for Israel. Israel will get blamed by everybody for any deaths of American soldiers or pilots who “got killed for saving Israel’s butt.” Even though a US attack on Iran saved Saudi Arabia and the world. The pundits will scream, “Israel pushed America into an Iranian war it didn’t need.” And for what, hasn’t US defense secretary and Chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff for years told us and sworn under oath to the US Congress that “at best a US attack on Iran will only delay, NOT eliminate Iran’s nukes.”

So, Israel will get hysterically blamed in the American media, for American body bags from an American attack on Iran and get, at best, a two year delay. And for a two year delay, Israel gives Iran an immediate “West Bank” beachhead from which it can easily genocidally murder 70 percent of Israel’s population, and lay waste to 80 percent of her industrial base.

Finally, by Obama’s suggestion of US -Iran-attack-for-Palestinian-Arab-state deal, he knows no Israel Prime Minister can be that totally stupid, and take it. Consequently, Obama has created for himself a perfect PR stunt to blame Israel for Iran getting nukes. What’s more, Obama gets a perfect shield to dodge Israel’s demands for an attack on Iran.

Just imagine Obama complaining to his American Jewish donors (who will eat it up like the liberal sycophants they are), “I tried my best to help Israel with Iran, but I needed their help with the Arabs, and Israel outright rejected my help. So, my hands were tied. Israel didn’t know what’s best for itself.” To the world-at-large Obama’s blame will be a harsher, “Israel’s rejection of Peace caused the Iranian nuclear bomb.” So, Obama will lie and claim Israel caused an Iran’s bomb, not his insane nuclear appeasement of a new Islamo-Nazi world threatening menace.

In conclusion, Israel must publicly, but politely, expose Obama’s Orwellian linkage of a Palestinian Arab state in Judea and Samaria for a US Iranian war talk or even for a US Iranian attack for the perverse scam it truly is.

The Iran Nuke/PA state linkage must be publicly denuded as a policy hoax before President Obama lands on the Ben Gurion Tarmac. In fact, the more such nuke linkage Obama creates, the more Iran has an actual incentive, and cover, to accelerate its nuclear bomb program. Iran will have the perfect “Obama-approved” excuse for building a nuclear bomb: “Israel made me do it.” The Europeans and Obama’s left-wing Jewish donors will swallow it whole.

For more information about Mark Langfan’s 3-Dimensional Topographic Map System of Israel, please go to Http://www.marklangfan.com

Morsi to Send Security Delegation to Israel – Defense/Security – News – Israel National News

February 20, 2013

Report: Morsi to Send Security Delegation to Israel

For the first time since Morsi took office, Egypt will be sending a security delegation to Israel, reports Channel 10.

AAFont Size

By Elad Benari

First Publish: 2/19/2013, 5:43 AM

Mohammed Morsi

Mohammed Morsi

Israel news photo: Flash 90

For the first time since Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated President Mohammed Morsi took office, Egypt will be sending a security delegation to Israel.

Channel 10 News reported on Monday that the Egyptian delegation will discuss issues such as the situation in Gaza and other matters of mutual interest with Israeli officials. The delegation is scheduled to arrive in Israel in the near future, the report said, but no exact date was given.

While Morsi has repeatedly said he would continue to maintain the peace with Israel and uphold international documents signed by prior Cairo administrations, he has mostly given Israel the cold shoulder since taking office.

In November, Morsi recalled the Egyptian ambassador to Israel in protest of Israel’s counterterrorism Operation Pillar of Defense in Gaza.

Last October, Egypt rejected an Israeli request to upgrade the relations between the countries, after the Jewish State expressed interest in expanding the cooperation between the two countries and raising it to a level of ministerial talks between Defense Minister Ehud Barak and his Egyptian counterpart.

Last week, a four-man Israeli security delegation reportedly arrived in Cairo to take part in talks about the peace process between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Some reports indicated the Israeli delegation had come to hold indirect talks with Hamas about understandings reached after the ceasefire which ended Pillar of Defense.

Sending a security delegation to Israel would be the first time that Morsi’s regime publicly acknowledges the relations and cooperation between the two countries, noted Channel 10.

Shortly after he took office, Morsi decided to order the retirement of Egypt’s top generals, including Defense Minister Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, with whom Israel had enjoyed close ties during the Mubarak regime.

While the generals were not replaced with members of the Muslim Brotherhood, the replacements were certainly approved by the movement, said the Channel 10 report.

via Morsi to Send Security Delegation to Israel – Defense/Security – News – Israel National News.

Israel’s infrastructure exposed to cyber-risk | The Times of Israel

February 20, 2013

Israel’s infrastructure exposed to cyber-risk | The Times of Israel.

 

 

Israel’s infrastructure exposed to cyber-risk

Though less talented than the Chinese, Iranian and Arab hackers may be able to get to electrical and water systems, expert says

February 20, 2013, 1:52 pm 0

 

The Syrian Electronic Army (Screenshot)

The Syrian Electronic Army (Screenshot)

 

 

Israelis are — with good reason — concerned about the possibility that Iran will attain nuclear weapons. But perhaps they should be more worried that Iran will be able to take over the country’s basic infrastructure, wreaking havoc with the gas, water, and electricity systems, as well as the banking system.

 

“If nuclear weapons were the ‘judgment day’ weapon of the 20th century, computer infrastructure hacking is the 21st century equivalent,” said Tal Pavel, an expert on Internet usage and crimes in the Middle East.

 

“In some ways, the threat of hacking major infrastructure systems is even worse than the nuclear threat,” he told The Times of Israel. “Only governments can afford to purchase and deploy nuclear weapons, so you know who is attacking you and how to deal with them. But anyone can develop or buy their own super-virus, potentially capable of a cyber-attack that could shut down a country for days, create panics or riots, or release dangerous substances, such as gas and sewage, that can kill people in the victim country.”

 

This is a problem for Israel, too, he said, as the country’s enemies become more cyber-capable. In fact, Arab or Iranian hackers may have already gone after Israeli infrastructure systems.

 

Pavel was speaking in the wake of a major exposé Monday that showed how groups of Chinese hackers — almost certainly working on behalf of China’s military forces — have been systematically invading major corporations and infrastructure systems in the United States. Among the companies attacked by the Chinese hackers, according to US security firm Mandiant, were several with access to information about gas, oil, and electrical infrastructure throughout the US, Canada, Mexico, and elsewhere.

 

One company, Telvent Canada, had blueprint designs for more than half of the oil and gas pipelines in North and South America; it was only some quick thinking by an employee that prevented the hackers from swiping the documents.

 

China, of course, has denied that it was involved in any attacks on the US, and unfortunately for Washington, there is no way to prove that the Chinese government was behind the attack – although, an expert told The New York Times, which broke the story Monday, “the totality of the evidence” leaves the Chinese army as the sole suspect.

 

Cyber-attacks against infrastructure are nothing new, said Pavel. “Just because we haven’t heard about something doesn’t mean it’s not happening,” he said. “Such attacks take place on a regular basis, but unless you are privy to the real-time events, you can’t know if an infrastructure failure is due to a hack attack or some other reason.”

 

A good example of this was the recent outage at Israel’s Pelephone cellphone service provider, with service shut down for millions of customers for the better part of a day. “I don’t know if this was due to a hacking attack,” Pavel said. “Only the company knows, and of course they won’t tell. But it certainly could have been, just like the Stuxnet attack on Iran’s computers several years ago could have been conducted by Israeli and US hackers, as rumor has it. But for the vast majority of us, that will always remain an open question, just like the question of whether it was hackers who attacked Pelephone will remain open.”

 

Fortunately for Israel, said Pavel, the countries most likely to attack in a major cyberwar are unlikely to be able to take on Israel’s electrical, gas, and water infrastructure. “Iran, Syria, and the other likely cyber-attackers are not China, which has billions of people and high levels of computer sophistication. Nevertheless, it’s certainly possible for Iran to get top-flight training for its hackers, raising their skills to the point where they can successfully attack Israel’s considerable cyber defenses.” Or, he said, they could hire hackers who do have the capability to write viruses and Trojans that can worm their way into Israel’s infrastructure.

 

And even without the money, computer resources, and talent of Chinese hackers, Arab and Iranian hackers can inflict plenty of damage on Israel, said Pavel. “Just a few weeks ago, we saw how Syrian hackers were able to compromise the email system of Haaretz.” The attack, by a group called the Syrian Electronic Army, was very simple (using a password to get into Haaretz employee mailboxes), but caused plenty of inconvenience for the paper and its employees.

 

Dr. Tal Pavel (Photo credit: Courtesy)

Dr. Tal Pavel (Photo credit: Courtesy)

 

“With all the fighting in Syria they barely have an Internet infrastructure in place these days, but despite the unrest there these hackers were able to pull off an attack,” said Pavel. It’s just a matter of time before Iranian or Arab hackers will be able to reach secure Israeli infrastructure systems, as they grow in sophistication and capabilities, Pavel said.

 

How were the hackers able to get access to Haaretz employee accounts? The same way Mandiant said that Chinese hackers were able to gain access to American infrastructure systems — by “phishing” for victims, using a convincing-looking email and getting the victim to click on a link or open an infected document. In the case of Haaretz, victims received an email with an ostensible link to an article in The British Guardian newspaper about the peace process. But the link instead led to a hacker site, which, when connected to the victims computer, required their username and password for access. Once they typed that in, the connection was broken; the hackers had what they needed, so there was no reason to continue the pretense.

 

The Chinese hackers did something similar, sending an email to an employee of Telvent with a link to a document. The document, in perfect English, bore the email address of the employee’s manager. It’s only because the employee remembered the company’s policy on email links — i.e., not to click on them — that the Chinese hackers did not gain access to the company’s servers. “Phishing is a form of social engineering,” said Pavel. “The hackers search for the ‘weakest link,’ matching a message with a potential victim, using threats, rewards, fear or other psychological tactics to get the victim to click on a link or open a document that will install a virus or Trojan, giving them access to servers.”

 

Phishing messages, said Mandiant, are among hackers’ most successful tactics; the only way to avoid these attacks is to set policies regarding document attachments and links in emails and on non-secure websites, and to ensure that employees and their family members follow those policies, said Pavel. “Israelis in general need to be more aware of this,” he said.

Iran: Nuclear talks are an ‘opportunity’ for West – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

February 20, 2013

Iran: Nuclear talks are an ‘opportunity’ for West

Foreign Ministry spokesman says Iran would be willing to ease concerns over its nuclear program if West recognizes its right to enrich uranium.

By The Associated Press and DPA | Feb.19, 2013 | 11:04 AM

Ashton and Jalili meet in Moscow for Iran nuclear talks – AFP – June 18, 2012

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and chief Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili meet in Moscow, on June 18, 2012. Photo by AFP

Text size

Comments (0)

Print Page

Send to friend

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share

this story is by

The Associated Press

DPA

related tags

Iran nuclear

Iran

Iran US

Iran sanctions

related articles

Biden: U.S. prepared to hold direct talks with Iran only if regime ‘is serious’

By The Associated Press | Feb.19,2013 | 11:04 AM | 11

Iran rejects U.S. offer for direct talks, says won’t be frightened by ‘gun threats’

By Reuters | Feb.19,2013 | 11:04 AM | 51

Iran escalating efforts to destabilize region, says Panetta

By Reuters | Feb.19,2013 | 11:04 AM | 15

Hagel: Window is closing on Iran and possibility of diplomacy

By The Associated Press | Feb.19,2013 | 11:04 AM | 16

Iran says it is willing to ease Western concerns about Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for pledges from the Unites States and others about its ability to enrich uranium.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast says an “opportunity” awaits at the nuclear talks next week between Iran and world powers in Kazakhstan.

Mehmanparast told reporters on Tuesday that Iran seeks a “show of goodwill” by the U.S. and its allies to recognize Iran’s nuclear “rights,” which include enriching uranium.

The five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Germany are to restart nuclear negotiations with Iran in Almaty, Kazakhstan, on February 26.

“There would be a swift solution if the 5+1 group came up at the next nuclear meeting with goodwill as well as suitable and balanced initiatives, such as acknowledgment of Iran’s nuclear rights,” Mehmanparast said.

“Just as we are committed to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, we also want to maintain our rights according to the same treaty. Therefore any threats or pressures in the talks would be irrelevant and definitely not work,” he added.

Mehmanparast says Iran would respond with proposals to address Western concerns.

Earlier this month, Vice President Joe Biden said Washington was prepared to talk directly to Iran. Tehran rejected the offer.

The West suspects Iran’s enrichment program could eventually produce material for a nuclear weapon, a charge Iran denies.

via Iran: Nuclear talks are an ‘opportunity’ for West – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

U.S. think tank: Iran nuke unlikely to start Mideast arms race – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

February 20, 2013

U.S. think tank: Iran nuke unlikely to start Mideast arms race – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

 

U.S. think tank: Iran nuke unlikely to start Mideast arms race

While some analysts see Saudis, Egypt, Turkey seeking to build their own bombs, a report by a non-partisan institute believes the conventional wisdom is wrong.

By Reuters | Feb.20, 2013 | 2:18 PM

 

 

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei gives a speech

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei gives a speech in a mosque inside the leader’s housing compound, in Tehran, Iran in February, 2013. Photo by AP

 

this story is by
Reuters

 

Fears that an Iranian nuclear weapon might trigger an atomic arms race across the Middle East are overplayed, a U.S. security think tank said on Tuesday, arguing that countries like Saudi Arabia face big disincentives against getting the bomb.

 

Western powers believe Iran is trying to develop a nuclear weapon under cover of a civilian atomic electricity program, a charge Tehran denies.

 

Sunni Muslim Saudi Arabia, the world’s biggest oil exporter, is engaged in a fierce rivalry with Shi’ite power Iran and is seen in Western countries as the most likely Middle Eastern state to seek an atomic weapon if Iran did the same.

 

Analysts have also said an Iranian nuclear weapons capability might persuade Egypt and Turkey to seek a bomb too.

 

Israel, which has never declared its atomic weapons capability, is thought to be the Middle East’s only nuclear-armed power now although Iran’s eastern neighbor Pakistan has atomic weapons.

 

In December 2011, former Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki al-Faisal said that if Tehran did gain nuclear weapons capability, Saudi Arabia should consider matching it.

 

Riyadh has also announced plans to build 17 gigawatts of atomic energy by 2032 as it moves to reduce domestic oil consumption, freeing up more crude for export.

 

However, a report by the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) says that although there is some risk that Saudi Arabia would seek an atomic bomb, it would more likely rely on its ally, the United States, to protect it.

 

“The conventional wisdom is probably wrong,” the report said.

 

Even if Saudi Arabia wished to acquire a bomb, “significant disincentives would weigh against a mad rush by Riyadh to develop nuclear weapons”.

 

CNAS, based in Washington, was set up in 2007 as a non-partisan think tank aiming to develop U.S. security policy.

 

The report’s authors include Colin Kahl, a former deputy assistant U.S. Secretary of Defense for the Middle East, and Melissa Dalton, a foreign affairs specialist with the secretary.

 

The difficulty and expense of embarking on a nuclear arms programme in defiance of international law and the wishes of the kingdom’s most important ally, Washington, would be a powerful argument against such an undertaking, it said.

 

Riyadh is a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Some analysts have aruged that instead of attempting to build its own atomic weapon, Riyadh might try to buy a fully developed nuclear bomb from ally Pakistan.

 

However, the report said this was also unlikely.

 

“Instead, Saudi Arabia would likely pursue a more aggressive version of its current conventional defense and civilian nuclear hedging strategy while seeking out an external nuclear security guarantee,” they said.

 

The report said Egypt did not see Iran’s nuclear ambitions as an existential threat and that Turkey already has a nuclear deterrent in the form of its NATO security guarantees.