Archive for July 2012

Congress approves expanded military aid to Israel

July 18, 2012

Congress approves expanded military aid to Israel – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act now awaits President Barack Obama’s signature before it can become law.

By Natasha Mozgovaya | Jul.18, 2012 | 2:54 PM]
An Iron Dome missile being launched.

The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act, which is meant to approve and expand military cooperation between the two countries, easily passed both houses of Congress on Tuesday and now awaits President Barack Obama’s signature.

The House version of the bill was passed in May. The Senate version, which was passed in June, extended the authority of the US to store weapons in Israel that could be used by Israel in case of emergency, which required an additional House vote.

AIPAC commended the House’s passage of the bill, saying in a statement, “The United States benefits greatly through enhanced cooperation with Israel. This bipartisan bill recommends new avenues to grow and strengthen the U.S.-Israel relationship in the fields of missile defense, homeland security, energy, intelligence, and cyber-security.”

Rep. Howard Berman said during the floor debate that “since its founding, Israel has faced innumerable challenges to its survival, but the serious threats it faces today are unprecedented…. This bill once again re-affirms our determination to support Israel’s qualitative military edge against any possible combination of regional threats.”

“Currently, there are only a handful of Iron Dome batteries operational in Israel.  More are needed in order to protect all of Israel’s eight million citizens. This bill also pledges to assist Israel with its ongoing efforts to forge a peaceful, negotiated settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that results in two states living side by side in peace and security. I applaud Prime Minister Netanyahu’s willingness to negotiate anywhere, any time.  The Palestinians should take him up on that offer, instead of pursuing a campaign to delegitimize Israel at the UN and elsewhere,” he said.

US gears up for Iran attack: Construction of missile defense station in Qatar:.

July 18, 2012

.:Middle East Online::US gears up for Iran attack: Construction of missile defense station in Qatar:..

Missile defense radar station in Qatar will be part of system intended to defend interests of US, its allies against Iranian rockets.

Is time for military option nearing?

 

WASHINGTON – The Pentagon is building a missile defense radar station at a covert location in Qatar, The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday.

The site will be part of a system intended to defend the interests of the United States and its allies against Iranian rockets, unnamed US officials told the newspaper.

The Journal also reported that Washington was preparing for its biggest-ever minesweeping exercises in the Gulf in September, calling them the “first such multilateral drills in the region.”

A similar radar has existed on Mount Keren in the Negev Desert since 2008 and another is installed in Turkey as part of NATO’s missile defense shield.

In addition, officials told the Journal that US Central Command, which oversees US military operations in the Middle East and South Asia, wants to deploy the first Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile system in the area in the coming months, possibly in the United Arab Emirates.

Tensions with Iran — which Western powers suspect of secretly striving to build nuclear weapons — are rife in the Gulf region.

An Indian fisherman was killed and three others wounded on Monday when a US navy ship opened fire on their vessel near the United Arab Emirates port of Jebel Ali in the southern Gulf.

US defense officials said the fishing boat had ignored warnings not to approach the refueling ship USNS Rappahannock, and that sailors on board the American vessel feared it could pose a threat.

The United States has warned Teheran about blocking the strategically important Strait of Hormuz, and has significantly bolstered its military presence there.

Fears of a closure of the strait — through which about a fifth of the world’s traded oil passes — intensified earlier this year after Iran threatened to close it if Western governments kept up efforts to rein in Tehran’s controversial nuclear program by choking off its oil exports.

Tehran says its nuclear activities are for peaceful purposes only.

The United States is trying to prevent military action by Israel against Iran.

In Israel on Monday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Washington would use “all elements of its power” to prevent Iran going nuclear and was working in “close consultation” with Israel over how to do so.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is also expected to visit Israel in the coming weeks, according to the Pentagon.

Assad trusts inner circle in fight for survival

July 18, 2012

Assad trusts inner circle in fight for sur… JPost – Middle East.

By REUTERS
07/18/2012 11:27
Insight: Assad sets up elite crisis group of family, clan and security aides as flames of conflict reach the seat of power in Damascus.

Syrian President Bashar Assad
Photo: Sana / Reuters

BEIRUT – As fighting rages in Damascus, and the Assad family that has ruled Syria for four decades struggles for its life against a growing rebellion, a picture is emerging of a tight inner group determined to fight its way out of the crisis, even as support for the government falls away.

At its head is Syrian President Bashar Assad, who inherited power from his father in 2000 and who friend and opponent alike say appears increasingly detached from reality, convinced he is fighting a conspiracy against him and Syria.

Around him is a tight circle of family and clan members, and a security establishment staffed mainly by adherents of the Alawite minority to which the Assads belong, a branch of Shi’ite Islam in a country that is three quarters Sunni.

“Even those who love him feel he can no longer provide security,” said Ayman Abdel-Nour, an adviser to Assad until 2007 and now an opposition figure. “They think he is useless and living in a cocoon.”

“He thinks of himself as God’s messenger to rule Syria. He listens to the sycophants around him who tell him ‘you are a gift from God.’ He believes that he is right and that whoever contradicts him is a traitor. Many of his close friends and advisers have either left him or distanced themselves from him.”

In response, Assad has taken charge of a military crisis unit and takes all the daily decisions, from the deployment of army units to tasks assigned to the security services, as well as mobilization of the Alawite Shabbiha, the feared militia accused of a series of massacres in the past two months.

“Bashar remains the center. He is involved in the day-to-day details of managing the crisis,” said a Lebanese politician close to the Syrian rulers. “He set up an elite unit led by him to manage the crisis daily.”

In this unit, intelligence chief Hisham Bekhtyar is responsible for security coordination, Dawoud Rajha is minister of defense, Assef Shawkat, the president’s powerful brother-in-law, is deputy chief of staff of the armed forces. Alongside them are Ali Mamlouk, special adviser on security, Abdel-Fattah Qudsiyeh, head of military intelligence, and Mohammad Nassif Kheyrbek, a veteran operator from the era of Assad’s father.

‘Kill or be killed’

Maher Assad, the president’s younger brother and Syria’s second most powerful man, commands the main loyalist strike forces.

“Maher is directly involved in the confrontation on the ground and is in direct contact with every one of them. He has direct military responsibilities,” the Lebanese politician said.

While there has been no shake-up in the leadership, its inner circle is beginning to realize it faces a serious crisis. “In the hierarchy of the authorities you don’t see a noticeable change,” he said. But “you hear more realistic language. The prestige and standing of the regime has been scratched.”

Abdel-Nour, the former Assad adviser, paints a darker picture of the inner circle. He stresses that there is nothing autonomous about the way government units operate, whether the shelling of opposition neighborhoods by Maher’s armored columns or the killing of villagers by the Shabbiha militia. All units are under Bashar’s command and many have family ties.

Each region has its own Shabbiha leader and many of the central cities are led by Shabbiha men related to Assad.

The 46-year-old Assad said last month that Syria was at war and ordered his government to spare no effort in pursuit of victory against rebels he has described as terrorists.

Drawing parallels with his earlier profession as an eye surgeon, he said: “When a surgeon performs an operation to treat a wound do we say to him: ‘Your hands are covered in blood’?”

“Or do we thank him for saving the patient?”

Some long-time observers of Syria’s secretive politics believe Assad’s attempt to keep tight control of his forces will not necessarily protect him from being toppled internally if it looks as though he cannot prevail militarily.

Patrick Seale, biographer of Assad’s father, Hafez Assad, said: “Assad is a front man for a big security establishment of 300,000 regular army. He has a small clique that supplies him with information.”

“They might still mount a coup against him and that remains his big threat.”

After 16 months, the conflict has reached the seat of Assad’s power in Damascus. Government forces and opponents are fighting with the ferocity of those who know what awaits them if they lose.

“There is war in Syria: either kill or be killed,” said the pro-Syrian Lebanese politician.

A Western diplomat added: “They are fighting like a pack of wolves.”

Civil war; proxy war

While facts on the ground often cannot be verified because independent media are largely excluded from Syria, the conflict is now seen by observers to have changed from an uprising in poor towns and villages to a civil war that has reached the streets of the capital.

It has also become a proxy war between Russia and Shi’ite Muslim Iran, which back Assad, one one side, and Sunni Muslim powerhouse Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar, which are arming and funding the Sunni rebels on the other. The rebels now include the Free Syrian Army, a group of army defectors joined by Sunni youths, al-Qaida style Jihadists, the Muslim Brotherhood, and local pro-democracy Sunni liberals.

Weapons are being smuggled across the borders from Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq and Jordan.

“Syria … is clearly right now a battleground for proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran, reflecting a centuries-old conflict between Shi’ite and Sunni powers,” said Ayham Kamel of Political Risk consultancy Eurasia.

While the rebels inside Syria are gaining ground, the Syrian political opposition in exile remains bogged down in factional divisions and is losing influence.

The government is meanwhile losing its ability to spread fear. Defections of senior officers and officials have accelerated in recent weeks although the backbone of the military remains intact due to Alawite solidarity.

“The Syrian regime is slowly and totally sinking. I don’t know what the timeline will be. It is becoming difficult for the state to control the country. It is like a fire engine, they extinguish one fire and find that another fire has started in another place,” said a senior Western diplomat.

“The army is overstretched, the government is under sanctions and there is erosion of power,” he added.

Government control slipping

Many Sunni officers, police and security staff have either defected or are not reporting for duty. Those manning traffic and police checkpoints are mainly Alawites, who can be recognized by their accent, residents say.

Responsibility for defending the Assads is falling on the mainly Alawite battalions led by Maher, Bashar’s brother.

In outlying cities and on the outskirts of the capital, residents say the only sign of any government presence is tanks and armored personnel carriers stationed on main roads. Traffic and ordinary police are nowhere to be seen.

Residents stood in disbelief at the sight of rebels manning checkpoints, blocking streets and clashing with government troops in Damascus. “A few days ago, we would have said this was impossible. It is a dangerous indication,” said a resident reached by telephone.

Government forces are scared of entering some rebel areas and they use artillery and helicopters gunships to bomb rebel positions, Syrians reached by telephone say.

Close watchers of Damascus say while the authorities’ power has been eroding they doubt that a lightly armed rebels can defeat an army, backed with Russian-made tanks, armored personnel carriers and warplanes.

“Bashar and his regime have been profoundly destabilized but there is some doubt whether he can be toppled by the rebels for all the following reasons: Russia’s protection, a divided opposition and no appetite for military intervention,” said Assad biographer Patrick Seale.

But he added: “No regime can last forever … I cannot see a peaceful settlement for the moment. I can see a bloody stalemate, more shooting, more killing. The situation is very bad, chaos and insecurity are everywhere. Kidnapping, killing and hostage-taking, ethnic-cleansing are rife,” Seale said.

He said Assad’s officer corps would not give up on him unless they feel they will have a role in a post-Assad Syria.

‘Zero chance’

Despite the carnage and the failure so far of international peace efforts, Western diplomats said a Libyan-style military intervention is off the table, because of geopolitical complications and fear of a regional conflagration.

“Libya is different from Syria … Russia (is) involved on the ground and backing Assad. Iran is providing a lot of financial and military help for the Assad regime,” the Lebanese politician said.

Russia and Iran, Abdel-Nour said, are not just supplying Assad with weapons. They are also providing equipment to intercept the communications of the Free Syrian Army.

The focus of the United Sates, Qatar and Saudi Arabia is to try and entice senior officials and officers to split from the Assad circle to weaken his hold on power.

“At some point, they will feel that there is no way out and they have to abandon the boat before it sinks,” said the Western diplomat.

Many observers say in the absence of outside military intervention, the conflict could slide into a full-scale civil war that would further weaken the Assads, bring in new players and force an internationally sponsored transfer of power.

“The regime has not lost full control. We will transition into civil war. The opposition has become a lot more powerful and capable at the military and financial level with the help of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey,” said Ayham Kamel of Eurasia.

“Incrementally, the regime will become weaker,” he said. “Change will come in two ways: either through a shift in the balance of power in the conflict, or though a prolonged civil war, or through a negotiated compromise and international transition plan sponsored by the US and Russia,” he added.

“Even if Bashar goes it doesn’t mean that someone will take over,” he added, suggesting that the country will collapse into sectarian anarchy.

In the meantime, the authorities have upped their game, using tanks, artillery and helicopter gunships against rebels waging what they call “The Battle of Damascus”.

“The question Damascenes ask has changed from before,” one resident said. “They no longer ask if the regime will fall but when?

Blast kills Syrian defense minister, Assad’s brother-in-law

July 18, 2012

Blast kills Syrian defense minister, Assad… JPost – Middle East.

By REUTERS
07/18/2012 13:31
Interior minister is injured in explosion at Damascus National Security building; Republican Guard troops seal off hospital where casualties were brought; overnight fighting breaks out near Damascus presidential palace.

Syrian Defense Minister Daoud Rajha

Photo: Sana / Reuters

Syrian state television said a “terrorist explosion” which struck a national security building in Damascus killed Syrian Defense Minister Daoud Rajha and critically injured the country’s interior minister on Wednesday.

“The terrorist explosion which targeted the national security building in Damascus occurred during a meeting of ministers and a number of heads of (security) agencies,” the television.

A security force told Hezbollah’s al-Manar television station that Assad’s brother-in-law Assef Shawkat was killed in the attack.

Activists at the scene said that Republican Guard troops sealed off Damascus’s Shami Hospital after ambulances arrived with casualties from the explosion.

A report from Lebanese-based news channel Al-Mayadeen said that several senior security officials were killed in the explosion.

Overnight, the revolt against Syrian President Bashar Assad came within sight of his presidential palace as fighting erupted in major Damascus neighborhoods for a fourth day.

An army barracks near the “palace of the people,” a huge Soviet style complex overlooking the sprawling capital from the western district of Dummar, came under rebel fire around 7.30 a.m. (0430 GMT), activists and a resident said.

“I could hear the sound of small arms fire and explosions are getting louder and louder from the direction of the barracks,” Yasmine, who works as an architect, said by phone from Dummar.

Video footage broadcast by activists purportedly showed fire in the barracks overnight as a result of an attack by mortar rounds, but residents who saw the fire said they had not heard explosions to indicate it was a result of an attack.

Dummar is a secure area containing many auxiliary installations for the presidential palace and the barracks is just hundreds of meters from the palace itself.

Fighting also erupted overnight in the southern neighborhoods of Asali and Qadam, and Hajar al-Aswad and Tadamun – mainly Sunni Muslim districts housing Damascenes and Palestinian refugees.

Assad and the ruling elite belong to the minority Alawite sect, an offshoot of Shi’ite Islam that has dominated power in Syria since a 1963 coup.

Government troops used heavy machine guns and anti-aircraft guns against rebels moving deep in residential neighborhoods, armed mostly with small arms and rocket propelled grenades.

Opposition is cautious

Rebels directed their fire overnight at a large state facility turned headquarters for pro-Assad militia, known as shabbiha, drawn mainly from Alawite enclaves in nearby hills.

Army tanks and anti-aircraft guns, used as an infantry weapon, took positions in the northern neighborhood of Barzeh, where hundreds of families from the neighboring district of Qaboun are seeking shelter.

“Anti-aircraft guns are firing at Qaboun from Barzeh. There are lots of families in the streets with no place to stay. They came from Qaboun and from the outskirts of Barzeh,” said Bassem, one of the activists, speaking by phone from Barzeh.

In the central neighborhood of Midan tanks and infantry fighting vehicles known as BDMs took positions in main thoroughfares and sporadic fighting was reported.

“Armour have not been able to enter the alleyways and old streets of Midan. The neighborhoods old Zahra and the old area near Majed mosque are in the hands of the rebels,” said Abu Mazen, an activist in the district.

Rebel fighters have called the intensified guerrilla attacks in recent days, which have targeted shabbiha buses, unmarked intelligence patrols and armored vehicles in the capital, the battle “for the liberation of Damascus” after 16 months of revolt.

But senior opposition figures took a more nuanced view.

“It is going to be difficult to sustain supply lines and the rebels may have to make a tactical withdrawal at one point, like they did in other cities,” veteran opposition activist Fawaz Tello said from Istanbul.

“But what is clear is that Damascus has joined the revolt,” Tello, a Damascene, told Reuters. “By hitting well known Sunni districts of the city, such as Midan, the regime is exposing the sectarian nature of the crackdown.”

Information Minister Omran Zoabi said on Tuesday security forces were fighting armed infiltrators in Damascus. He said many had surrendered while others “escaped on foot and by car and are firing randomly in the air to frighten people.”

Assad’s kinsman Shawqat and defense minister Rajiha killed by suicide bomber

July 18, 2012

Assad’s kinsman Shawqat and defense minister Rajiha killed by suicide bomber.

DEBKAfile Special Report July 18, 2012, 2:31 PM (GMT+02:00)

 

Bashar Assad’s survival is in serious question after the deaths of his top allies, his brother-in-law Security Chief Assif Shawqat and Defense minister Gen. Dawoud Raijiha by a suicide bomber, while holding a top-level meeting in the National Security building in Damascus, Wednesday, July 18. Interior Minister Maj. Gen. Mohammad Ibrahim Shaair is in critical condition.

This was the deadliest blow to the Assad regime in the 17-month Syrian uprising, striking deep inside the president’s inner circle and family: Shawqat was married to his sister.  It took place on the fourth day of fierce fights with rebel forces which seized parts of Damascus and are battling superior government forces backed by heavy tank, artillery and machine gun fire and helicopters.
The bomber must have had an inside track to the top level of the Assad regime to have come close enough to reach a cabinet meeting with security officials in the heavily fortified National Security building and blow himself up among them.
To ward off the rebel assault on the capital, the Syrian regime engaged in the high-risk tactic of letting them enter the southern districts of Damascus, to trap them and then finish them off with superior fire power.
Assad meanwhile scattered his key government departments in fortified buildings around Damascus: The General Staff was assigned the military complex on Shuhada Street and the cabinet met at the National Security building. Now the Syrian ruler is forced to believe that all his security arrangements are deeply penetrated by his enemies who knew exactly where and when to strike.

London braces for Israeli strike on Iran during 2012 Games

July 18, 2012

London braces for Israeli strike on Iran during 2012 Games | The Times of Israel.

Olympic planning committee fears a military showdown during the largest sporting event in the world

July 18, 2012, 11:57 am 1
The main Olympic Stadium in London. Security forces are working overtime on preparations for the games. (photo credit: AP/Sang Tan)

The main Olympic Stadium in London. Security forces are working overtime on preparations for the games. (photo credit: AP/Sang Tan)

Taking into account the possibility of an Israeli attack on Iran during the 2012 Summer Games, the Olympic committee in charge of the London event has formed a special team to prepare for the contingency.

According to the Hebrew daily Yedioth Ahronoth on Wednesday., the team — consisting of politicians, diplomats, security officials and organizing committee personnel — wrote in a report that such a strike was entirely possible.

Yedioth reported that the team was also preparing for the possibility of an earthquake or volcanic eruption.

England is thought to be within the range of Iranian missiles and UK officials believe that a military confrontation between Jerusalem and Tehran could involve the country against its will.

The special team listed a number of steps that would need to be taken in the event of such a conflict, among them: opening a special command center, providing secret safe houses for foreign leaders wishing to meet for diplomatic purposes, and preparing for emergency evacuations of dignitaries.

The team said England would have to guarantee the safety of the athletes and the continuation of the Games, as well as make sure Israeli and Iranian athletes are kept away from each other.

Yedioth reported that the recommendations were passed on to the police, who practiced dealing with the mass protests that could erupt if war broke out.

Syria Talks Near Showdown as Violence Grows – Businessweek

July 18, 2012

Syria Talks Near Showdown as Violence Grows – Businessweek.

Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan

As rebel fighters yesterday pushed deeper into Damascus, the heart of President Bashar al-Assad’s power base, talks on Syria’s future headed toward a showdown at the United Nations with a vote this week on sanctioning the regime.

Assad, fighting for the survival of his Alawite clan’s four-decade hold on power, has been unable to suppress a revolt that’s escalated over 18 months into an armed insurgency pitting the majority Sunni Muslims against his Alawite leadership.

Russia, a Soviet-era ally of Syria, has shielded Assad until now from international action by using its veto at the Security Council. That allegiance will be tested again as soon as today in a vote threatening sanctions in 10 days if Assad doesn’t comply with a UN peace plan he’s flouted for five months. During that time, violence has intensified as the country has plummeted into what the International Red Cross now calls a civil war.

“This is the last chance for the council to act responsibly, and we are seeking other options outside,” said Bassma Kodmani, a member of the opposition Syrian National Council, at a news conference yesterday in New York. No one wants military intervention, such as NATO’s bombing of Libya, “not even us,” she said.

Three Strikes

In New York, diplomats have been trying to persuade Russia, which twice has blocked measures against its longtime ally, not to use its veto a third time. A Western-drafted resolution seeks to punish Assad’s violence against opponents by imposing non- military measures such as an arms embargo and asset freezes.

UN envoy Kofi Annan, a former UN secretary-general whose efforts to end the conflict in Syria have foundered, met yesterday in Moscow with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

“I don’t see any reason we can’t reach an agreement based on similar principles in the Security Council,” Lavrov told reporters in Moscow.

At stake for Russia is its last toehold in the Arab world. Syria is an arms customer and hosts Russia’s only military base outside the former Soviet Union in the port of Tartus. Since returning to power, Putin also has presented a more assertive foreign policy.

While Russia re-submitted an amended version of its resolution, it calls only for a rollover of a UN monitor mission without adding any pressure to hold Assad accountable for human- rights abuses, according to Western diplomats who all spoke on condition of the anonymity because the text isn’t public.

Little Hope

In New York yesterday, there was little hope of a breakthrough, and as the debate at the UN drags on, Assad’s fate seems more likely to be decided on the Syrian streets.

“Even if Russia doesn’t use its veto, is there a workable outcome if he leaves?” said Anthony Cordesman, a military analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, in a telephone interview. “This is going to play out bloodily on the battleground. It’s difficult to imagine a brokered scenario where the Alawites give up and one that the Sunnis accept.”

The Free Syrian Army battled security forces in Damascus for a fourth straight day. Syrian security forces killed at least 43 people yesterday in the capital, the Syrian Revolution General Commission, an opposition group, said on its website.

Damascus and Aleppo, Syria’s largest cities, have been spared the worst of the violence until recently, as government forces mounted fierce attacks on opponents in predominantly Sunni provinces such as Homs and Hama.

Closing In

The two cities are home to merchants and wealthy Assad supporters who have benefited from their ties to the regime. In recent weeks, though, clashes in the suburbs of Damascus have encroached on the capital.

“There are organized military units who are testing the regime in and around Damascus,” Salman Shaikh, director of the Brookings Institution’s Doha Center in Qatar, said in an interview yesterday from Cairo. “I suspect this is now going to be a continuing,intensifying battle in Damascus. The regime having to use heavy armor in the environment of Damascus tells you how much trouble it’s in.”

The UN efforts to end the bloodshed in Syria could be headed to a dead end if Russia keeps its promise to veto sanctions and the three-month UN monitoring mission, which has failed to quell the violence, is allowed to expire on July 20.

Other forms of international pressure on Assad, such as a Libya-style no-fly zone, won’t work in Syria because “they are not flying,” said Cordesman. The creation of humanitarian corridors is also unrealistic because “if you want them to exist you have to fight your way and fight to stay,” he said.

Assad’s eventual exile remains a possibility. His possible destinations are probably limited to Russia or Iran, his last remaining allies, according to Cordesman. That would make him the fifth leader to be swept away by the Arab Spring movement that has ousted long-standing autocrats in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen.

The opposition, which began as a loosely connected group of army defectors and untrained dissidents, has morphed into a more compact and organized rebel army that’s grabbed control of more territory and can now attack Assad closer to his seat of power, according to three UN diplomats who all spoke on condition of anonymity because the information they cited is classified.

Porous Borders

With Syria’s borders increasingly porous, weapons from Qatar and Saudi Arabia are easier to smuggle in, the officials said. Chaos has engulfed a nation approximately the size of North Dakota that’s at the center of the Middle East and counts Turkey, Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan and Israel as neighbors.

While more than 70 percent of Syria’s population is Sunni, Assad and the ruling elite belong to an offshoot of the Shiite branch of Islam that stands to lose privileges, property, and even their lives if his regime falls.

Nawaf Fares, the most prominent Syrian politician to have defected since the start of the revolt, told the BBC yesterday that Assad was “a wounded wolf” and if cornered, would be prepared to use chemical weapons.

The former Syrian ambassador to Iraq cited unconfirmed reports that some of that arsenal had been used in Homs, Syria’s third-largest city, which has been shelled by Assad’s security forces for months.

Chemical Weapons

Concerns about Syria’s stockpile of Sarin nerve agent, mustard gas, and cyanide is adding a troubling new dimension to the conflict.

Obama administration officials have skirted questions on what U.S. intelligence knows about the possibility Assad might turn his large cache of advanced weapons against his opponents.

“There are certain responsibilities that go along with the handling and storage and security of those chemical weapons,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters on Air Force One yesterday as President Barack Obama headed to a fundraiser in San Antonio, Texas.

To contact the reporter on this story: Flavia Krause-Jackson in United Nations at fjackson@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: John Walcott at jwalcott9@bloomberg.net

Deputy FM predicts crippling US sanctions on Tehran within weeks

July 18, 2012

Deputy FM predicts crippling US sanctions on Tehran within weeks | The Times of Israel.

Danny Ayalon says Israel and US are on the same page, including on the use of force if necessary

Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon (photo credit: Miriam Alster/Flash90)

Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon (photo credit: Miriam Alster/Flash90)

Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon predicted Tuesday that within weeks Iran’s entire banking and insurance systems will be placed under crippling sanctions, further isolating the Islamic republic from the international economy.

Ayalon made the statement in an interview for Army Radio in the wake of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s visit to Israel, during which she met with senior Israeli officials, her meetings focusing primarily on the Iranian threat and the two countries’ efforts to thwart it. Clinton pledged Monday evening that the US would do “everything in its power” to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

“Last Thursday I held the semi-annual strategic dialogue meeting with US Deputy Secretary of State William Burns. A day later the US announced new steps to bring Iranian banks and insurance companies under sanctions,” said Ayalon, stressing the shared interests of the two countries. “The US too has a clear interest to prevent a nuclear Iran. [US President Barack] Obama himself called it a strategic threat just the other day.”

Ayalon said that once all the Iranian banks and insurance companies were placed under sanctions, the Iranian economy would be crippled. “Their economy is already suffering severely. These steps, along with the embargo on Iranian oil, are having an effect. I hope this proves to them just how determined Israel is,” said Ayalon.

The deputy foreign minister said that talks between Israel and the US on the Iranian issue were held in an open atmosphere with the two countries sharing similar perspectives, including on the future use of force if necessary. “We are on the same side on this issue. Not only are all options on the table, there are US plans and preparations underway.”

Ayalon expressed disappointment over Clinton’s estimate that Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard would not be released from prison, but said the government would continue to do its best to free him.

Clinton’s message to Israel: Don’t jump the gun

July 18, 2012

Clinton’s message to Israel: Don’t jump the gun | The Times of Israel.

As the summer goes by, Israel’s window of opportunity for a strike at Iran may slowly be closing. So be it, the US is signaling, according to Israeli experts. Hold your fire; we’ve got this

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Netanyahu's office in Jerusalem on Monday. (photo credit: Ohad Zwigenberg/POOL/Flash90)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Netanyahu’s office in Jerusalem on Monday. (photo credit: Ohad Zwigenberg/POOL/Flash90)

At the end of her record-breaking 13-day journey to nine countries, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton invited journalists to a press conference at her Jerusalem hotel on Monday night. The event was scheduled for 9 p.m., but Clinton ran an hour and a half late. In the meantime, some US embassy staffers who had worked on her visit took the opportunity for a little nap on the hotel floor.

“I’m sorry to keep you so late, but it’s been a very busy and active, productive day here in Jerusalem,” Clinton said when she finally arrived. Given the hour, Clinton only briefly talked through the meetings with senior government officials she had held throughout the day. She didn’t explain what had held her up in the hotel — long after she had returned from talks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his senior ministers. Had she been reporting back to the president? Or maybe she, too, had allowed herself a nap?

She also, unsurprisingly, did not definitively answer the questions on everybody’s mind: What is the US going to do about Iran? And how? And when?

The secretary did give some hints, however. She made plain it was not too late for Iran to respond to international pressure and mend its nuclear ways. She underlined America’s continued preference for economic pressure over military force. And she used the interesting formulation that Israel and the US “are on the same page at this moment” (emphasis added) regarding efforts to thwart the regime from going nuclear — which may have been an entirely insignificant choice of words, or might just have pointed to the fact that Israel is nearer to Iran than the US, feels more threatened by Iran than does the US, might have a more limited capacity to effectively intervene militarily in Iran than does the US, and therefore might not always be “on the same page” over Iran as the US.

For Israeli analysts, the thrust of Clinton’s message to Israel was clear: Don’t jump the gun.

The US sees sanctions as having a biting impact. It is preparing more. It regards Iran as having tried in vain to divide the P5+1 nations — the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany. And it therefore emphatically feels the point of no return, the moment that would justify the use of military force, has not been reached.

Summarizes Emily Landau, a senior research associate at the Institute for National Security Studies: “The Americans are probably saying to the Israelis, do not take military action yet, because the sanctions have led to a new dynamic in the international community’s efforts to curb the Iranians’ nuclear aspirations.”

If so, perhaps Clinton’s reference to a “productive” day of meetings — including with the overtly itchy-fingered Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak — spelled “mission accomplished.” Perhaps she persuaded Israel to hold its fire, that the US has this one covered. Or perhaps that word, too, should not be subjected to exaggerated analysis.

Steering by the secretary

President Barack Obama has repeatedly pledged that he will not allow the Islamic Republic to acquire nuclear weapon capabilities, and that “all options” are on the table. While Clinton acknowledged with striking candor that the P5+1 nuclear talks are deadlocked — indeed, Iranian documents obtained by The Times of Israel earlier this month suggest that the Islamic Republic intends to expand its nuclear program rather than curtail it — she gave no indication that a readiness to utilize those options is growing.

‘The choice is ultimately Iran’s. Our own choice is clear: We will use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon’

Earlier this week, Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns discussed the issue in Jerusalem with his Israeli counterpart, Danny Ayalon; National Security Adviser Tom Donilon was here at the same time on a secret visit, engaging in “in-depth strategic consultations,” as Clinton said; and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta is scheduled to arrive in Jerusalem this month. So are the Americans coming to dissuade the Israelis from launching a preemptive strike at Iran’s nuclear facilities? Or are they coming to brief their counterparts on the plans for an American attack?

Again, Clinton wasn’t specifying, but she was steering: “We all prefer a diplomatic resolution, and Iran’s leaders still have the opportunity to make the right decision,” she said at Monday’s press conference. “The choice is ultimately Iran’s. Our own choice is clear: We will use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”

She added, “I made very, very clear that the proposals we have seen from Iran thus far within the P5+1 negotiations are nonstarters. Despite three rounds of talks, it appears that Iran has yet to make a strategic decision to address the international community’s concerns and fulfill their obligations under the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] and the UN Security Council.”

At the same time, she said that, “We know the sanctions are biting. Israel and the United States agree on that.”

Some mileage to go

According to Brig. Gen. (ret.) Uzi Eilam, a former top Defense Ministry official, the question is not whether the Americans are determined to stop Iran from going nuclear, because they clearly are, but what they will do to achieve their goal. “As I understand it, there is a willingness on the American side to implement additional sanctions in addition to the existing sanctions,” he said.

Eilam, who also served as director-general of the Israeli Atomic Energy Commission, said the Americans feel sanctions are working but need to be intensified. “There’s some more mileage to go before they give up,” he said. Personally, Eilam added, “I am sure the Iranians are rational and that they are aware of the impact of the sanctions.”

Emily Landau said that not only are the sanctions crippling the Iranian economy in a way the regime can no longer ignore, but Tehran is also noticing a change in the way the international community is speaking in one voice regarding its demands. “The Iranians are feeling the heat,” she told The Times of Israel.

Iran was hoping that it could get the European Union and the US to ease the sanctions on its oil industries and its banks, but the P5+1 stood united and remained determined, she added.

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton (left) and chief Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili (right) at the third round of P5+1 talks, in Moscow in June (photo credit: AP/Kirill Kudryavtsev)

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton (left) and chief Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili (right) at the third round of P5+1 talks, in Moscow in June (photo credit: AP/Kirill Kudryavtsev)

“Iran is not yet willing to discuss its nuclear program as seriously as the P5+1 would like them to. But Iran also wasn’t able split the P5+1,” she said, noting that just two years ago, Russia and China adamantly opposed tougher sanctions. Iran has met a somewhat different approach of late, says Landau. “There is a noticeable shift in the overall dynamic: Iran noticed a new type of determination, a new sense of greater unity of these powers, who don’t always see eye to eye on these issues.”

While it is impossible to know what Clinton discussed with the Israeli leaders, Landau believes that the secretary, like the other senior US officials coming to Jerusalem, is urging restraint. The mere fact that the Iranians are willing to sit down and talk about their nuclear program proves that international pressure is working, she said.

And if all else fails

‘The American air force would know exactly how to launch an aerial attack — even in bad weather’

But what if sanctions ultimately don’t prove sufficient? Washington promises to prevent Iran from going nuclear – but what is the operational definition of that statement? Israeli analysts speak of a closing of the “window of opportunity,” as Tehran moves its facilities underground. In addition, some Israeli pundits speculate over a strike before the winter, as the air force requires clear skies to launch an attack.

“It’s easier to wage war in the summer,” said Eilam, “and many of the wars here in our regions, excluding the War of Independence which lasted for two years, took place in either in summer or at the end of the summer, around October.”

If the US wanted to strike, however, it could do so at any time, he added. “Nowadays, airplanes are equipped with so many advanced [technological] systems. The American air force would know exactly how to launch an aerial attack — even in bad weather.”

The Holy Grail of US-Israel Cyber war on Iran

July 17, 2012

The Holy Grail of US-Israel Cyber war on Iran | Joe Tuzara | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel.

Although the United States and Israel has not publicly acknowledged the covert war against Iran’s disputed nuclear program, in a sense, we are already at war with Iran.

On the other hand, it is understandable why Israel’s patience is wearing thin in the midst of security leaks and complicated loopholes on Iran sanctions regime.

For several years in a row, the mainstream media are rife with rumors, innuendos and speculation of an Israeli attack on Iran’s underground nuclear enrichment facilities, industrial-military complex sabotage and assassinations of nuclear scientists.

The hits have been widely attributed to the Israeli intelligence service, the Mossad and the People’s Mujahedin of Iran (MEK), an organization the US designates as “terrorist.”

Recent reports indicated however, that the cyber war on Iran has only just begun is simply untrue. Historically, the cyber war had been brewing up since the Olympic Games were initiated by the Bush administration.

As a matter of strategic security policy, Israel neither denies nor confirmed any offensive covert acts against Iran which repeatedly threaten the total annihilation of the Jewish state, . Henceforth, Israel’s plausible deniability and ambiguity as the only nuclear power in the Middle East, is significantly important and crucial to its survival as a nation.

While the world speculates as to the origin of the Flame virus found in Iranian computers, The New York Times confirmed that the US ordered a previous virus, Stuxnet, deployed against Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities in 2008.

Until quite recently, it is even foolhardy to admit the security leaks emanating from the Obama White House in an election year is both tragic and potentially damaging to the security of both the US and Israel.

‘Operation Olympic Games’

Prior to his departure from the Oval Office, President G.W. Bush had urged President-elect Obama to preserve two highly classified intelligence programs code-named Operation Olympic Games and the drone program in Pakistan – of course, with the help of Israel to disrupt Iran’s nuclear program.

The computer worm project started during the Bush years and expanded under Obama was meant to cause Iranian centrifuges to self-destruct, pushing the US into a new era of cyber warfare.

The complex worm previously reported as Stuxnet is credited with “achieving, with computer code, what until then could be accomplished only by bombing a country or sending in agents to plant explosives.”

Michael Hayden, the former chief of the CIA, stated that “this is the first attack of a major nature in which a cyber attack was used to effect physical destruction rather than just slow another computer, or hack into it to steal data.” “Somebody crossed the Rubicon,” he said.

Indeed, the US and Israel’s cyber warriors had reached the point of no return, when they created the most lethal cyber weapons of the future. For the record, the two allies partnering on cyber programs like Stuxnet, was an Israeli innovation, not an American one as recently reported.

It was the brainchild of Israel’s military intelligence agency Aman and Unit 8-200 — Israel’s equivalent of the eavesdropping, code-breaking National Security Agency — and endorsed by the White House at Israel’s suggestion.

Another cyber weapon called Flame that was recently discovered to have attacked the computers of Iranian officials, sweeping up information from those machines was not part of Olympic Games which is an entirely different type and sophistication.

The US is also suspected of being behind the Flame virus, spyware able to record keystrokes, eavesdrop on conversations near an infected computer, and tap into screen images. Besides Iran, Flame has been found in computers in the Palestinian West Bank, Lebanon, Hungary, Austria, Russia, Hong Kong, and the United Arab Emirates. Because “malware” seeks out undefended computers no matter where they are, it has a habit of spreading beyond its initial target.

With regards to Natanz enrichment plant, the US and Israel have to rely on engineers, maintenance workers and others — both spies and unwitting accomplices — with physical access to the plant. “That was our holy grail,” one of the architects of the plan said. “It turns out there is always an idiot around who doesn’t think much about the thumb drive in their hand.”

In fact, thumb drives turned out to be critical in spreading the first variants of the computer worm; later, more sophisticated methods were developed to deliver the malicious code that left Iranians confused partly because no two attacks were exactly alike.

Repercussions of cyber attacks are alarming

Researchers from the Department of Homeland Security who launched an experimental cyber attack dubbed “Aurora,” and conducted in March 2007 at the Department of Energy’s Idaho lab caused a generator to self-destruct, alarming the federal government and electrical industry about what might happen if such an attack were carried out on a larger scale, CNN has learned.

Watch the previously classified video of the test CNN obtained:Staged cyber attack reveals vulnerability in power grid.

Government sources said changes are being made to both computer software and physical hardware to protect power generating equipment. And the Nuclear Regulatory Commission said it is conducting inspections to ensure all nuclear plants have made the fix.

In general, a major disruption in the US, Britain or Israel, due to some form of worm, malware or malicious code could quickly incapacitate and destroy the electric power grid or compromise air traffic control system resulting in catastrophic deaths and destruction far more lethal than the September 11 attacks.

In lieu of conventional military attacks, cyber warfare at this stage of development and implementation of Olympic Games directed at Iran’s nuclear program is both a blessing and a curse – a necessary evil that spell disaster to the aggressor and the defender, so to speak.

Moreover, the prospect of similar Iranian cyber attacks against the US, Israel and West is a foreboding thought- the success or failure depends entirely to whomever can marshal great resources and technological superiority.

Iran more likely would deploy thousands of Lebanese Hezbollah, Hamas and Syrian missile attacks on Israel, Iranian naval and missile attacks on the US Fifth Fleet based in Bahrain, the Gulf States oil shipments, platforms and eventually mining the Strait of Hormuz – a red line which is tantamount to acts of war against the US and the West.

Not to be outdone, asymmetric warfare conducted through proxies Hezbollah, Hamas, Venezuela and Mexican drug cartels inside the US and surrounding Israel cannot be ignored or underestimated. Iran knows for sure, that their inferior military capabilities are no match to US and Israel technological superiority. Hence, Iran’s bluster of electronic warfare and missile technology is a dangerous fantasy that will haunt them forever unless they regain their commonsensical reality.

Besides, the deployment of electromagnetic pulse (EMP) or electronic warfare over Iran and the targeted destruction of its nuclear facilities including the inner sanctum of the mullah-led regime would certainly bring a lasting peace and security to the entire Middle East.

Likewise in the past, Israel had successfully managed the bombings of Osirak reactor in Iraq and the Iranian/North Korean supported nuclear reactor in Syria without a glitch.

What we do not know yet is the secret back-door diplomacy spear-headed by the Muslim Brotherhood-led Team Obama and Iran’s clerical regime to break down the Islamic republic’s isolation by re-thinking their strategy and enabling a deceptive diplomatic sideshow of ending Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons till Obama’s re-election comes to bear fruit.

While ineffective sanctions and flawed diplomacy failed, there is no doubt that the only viable option left short of war, is a messy preemptive digital strikes!

If carpet-bombing Iran’s economy, diplomacy, negotiations and cyber attacks don’t work, make no mistake there is always and will be a military solution if Iran does not back down.

Well it was an amazing waste of time, endlessly blaming negotiations after negotiations-albeit, there will be an all-out war.