Archive for July 23, 2012

Iran in “open war” with Israel – CNN

July 23, 2012

EXCLUSIVE: Iran in “open war” with Israel – CNN Security Clearance – CNN.com Blogs.

By Elise Labott and Michael Schwartz, reporting from Jerusalem

Iran is in an “open war” with Israel, President Shimon Peres said Monday, as he pointed the finger at Iran and Hezbollah for last week’s bombing in Bulgaria that killed five Israelis.

In an exclusive interview with CNN, Peres said Israel would act to prevent further attacks.

Peres said Israel had “enough” hard intelligence to link the Bulgaria attack to Iran and its proxy Hezbollah and believes more attacks are being planned as part of what he called an “open war against Israel.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that Iran and the Lebanon-based Hezbollah movement were responsible for a number of attacks and attempted attacks against Israeli targets in Thailand, Georgia, India, Greece, Cyprus and other countries.

Asked whether the Bulgaria bombing and the other attempted attacks were revenge for the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists, which Iran blames on Israel, Peres said that Israel has never claimed responsibility for the killings. But he noted that Israel has a right to prevent killing of its citizens.

Security Clearance: Your source for national security news and analysis

“We don’t have an initiative of terror,” Peres said. “We don’t do it. But self-defense is the right and the must of every people.”

He said Israel’s policy was one of “prevention,” rather than “retaliation.”

“If you have enough information about a certain person which is a ticking clock that can explode a bomb that can endanger civilian life, clearly you have to prevent him from doing so,” Peres said, citing reports that the United States has killed as many as 3,000 people in drone strikes aimed at terrorist enclaves.

With neighboring Syria in a spiral of violence, Peres said Israel will be forced to seize Syria’s chemical weapons if there is a risk President Bashar al-Assad would use them against Israel or that the arsenal could fall into terrorist hands.

RECOMMENDED: U.S. talking to Israel, others about Syria’s chemical weapons

Over the weekend, Defense Minister Ehud Barak said he ordered the military to prepare contingency plans to attack Syria’s chemical weapons arsenals, should the need arise.

“The use of chemical weapons is internationally forbidden… and what do you do when somebody violates the law? You fight against it,” Peres said.

“You stop them. We shall not remain indifferent and tell them, ‘Do what you want.'”

When asked how far Israel would go to secure Syria’s chemical arsenal, Peres simply said: “Until it will stop being a danger.”

With Israel facing a potential influx of refugees, Peres said although no Syrians have tried to enter the country, Israel would not help any refugees who want to cross the border and would use force against any armed individuals.

“If they will come by force, we shall stop them by force,” Peres said. “If they shall come in without force, we shall stop them the way any country defended her border with civilian means.”

Peres spoke a day after Israel marked the 40th anniversary of the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich, Germany, where 11 Israeli athletes and coaches were killed.

While he wouldn’t go into details, Peres said Israel was taking precautions to ensure Israeli athletes would not be targeted at the London Olympic Games, which start later this week. He argued, however, that if Israeli intelligence services been at Munich, they would probably have been able to prevent the attack.

‘Israel won’t allow chemical weapons to reach Hezbollah’

July 23, 2012

Israel Hayom | ‘Israel won’t allow chemical weapons to reach Hezbollah’.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tells Fox that terror attack in Burgas “is a reminder … that the world’s most dangerous regime must not be allowed to have the world’s most dangerous weapons,” in reference to Iran • Israel files complaint with U.N. Security Council over Syrian troops entering demilitarized zone.

Shlomo Cesana, Yoni Hirsch, Lilach Shoval, News Agencies and Israel Hayom Staff
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tells Fox News he is less concerned with what replaces the regime in Syria and more with what happens to Syria’s chemical stockpiles.

|

Photo credit: Screenshot Fox News.

U.S. Mounts Quiet Effort to Weaken Assad’s Rule – WSJ.com

July 23, 2012

U.S. Mounts Quiet Effort to Weaken Assad’s Rule – WSJ.com.

The U.S. has been mounting a secret but limited effort to speed the fall of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad without using force, scrambling spies and diplomats to block arms and oil shipments from Iran and passing intelligence to front-line allies.

A centerpiece of the effort this year focused on getting Iraq to close its airspace to Iran-to-Syria flights that U.S. intelligence concluded were carrying arms for Assad loyalists—contrary to flight manifests saying they held cut flowers. The U.S. has also tried to keep ships believed to carry arms and fuel for Syria from traversing the Suez Canal, with mixed results.

The behind-the-scenes efforts by the Central Intelligence Agency, the State and Treasury departments and the military point to a broader American role in the campaign against Mr. Assad than previously acknowledged. The efforts have ramped up recently as relations with some in the Syrian opposition have warmed and as Mr. Assad has grown more desperate for supplies.

Skeptics within the Obama administration and on Capitol Hill, however, say U.S. pressure is hit-or-miss and comes too late to ensure U.S. influence over any post-Assad future. Many Syrian opposition leaders complain the U.S. hasn’t done enough and say the efforts of regional allies such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, in some cases to ship arms, are more significant.

U.S. officials acknowledge the limitations that come from the Obama administration’s unwillingness to get entangled in the conflict. While some weapons flights to Syria have been stopped, officials say intelligence is hard to obtain and overseas governments can be balky about cooperation. Some shipments of arms and fuel for Syria have slipped through.

image

Syrian opposition leaders acknowledge stepped-up contacts in recent months with State Department and CIA officials, mostly in southern Turkey. But rebel leaders say the U.S. could have pressed for a more concerted campaign to close down air and sea routes that resupply Mr. Assad’s forces, including the Suez Canal, earlier on.

“The Americans say to us that they have allowed the regional players to help us, but if they think this is an achievement…then they should know this is weak and inadequate support,” said Louay Mokdad, a logistics coordinator for the rebel Free Syrian Army. He and two rebel commanders offered examples of requests they said weren’t met, including for satellite images and an operations room.

A senior U.S. intelligence official said the administration recently decided to ramp up efforts to counter the Syrian regime.

“There is a renewed effort to crack down in any way possible,” another senior U.S. official said, pointing to stepped-up efforts to block certain shipments through the Suez Canal, which is controlled by Egypt.

That U.S. effort, described by officials familiar with it, is among the few concrete measures the administration is taking to bring to an end one of the last and bloodiest battles of the Arab Spring. It is symbolic of a broader shift in the U.S. approach to hot spots, away from expensive ground campaigns and toward covert and diplomatic operations.

Some administration and military officials believe they are putting pressure on Mr. Assad. Others expressed doubt about the strategy’s effectiveness, with one skeptic likening it to trying to dam a stream by standing in the middle of it.

House intelligence committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R., Mich.) said the effort “stops far too short of really having an impact” because there are so many ways to get arms into Syria, including smuggling routes through Lebanon.

“We’re just nowhere near where we need to be,” Mr. Rogers said.

A spokesman for the White House National Security Council declined to comment on specific efforts. “It’s clear that the Assad regime is losing control of Syria,” said the spokesman, Tommy Vietor, pointing to a bombing in Damascus last week that killed top Assad advisers.

Officials said the U.S. has been providing intelligence about developments in Syria to the Turkish and Jordanian militaries working closely with the rebels.

Imagery from military-controlled satellites and other surveillance equipment includes details about Syrian military sites that could help rebels in targeting as well as in tracking the regime’s chemical weapons, officials said.

They also said the CIA has provided limited intelligence to some opposition groups and used its informants to work with opposition elements. The CIA declined to comment.

One example of the U.S. approach—and of its limitations—came earlier this year when the U.S. sought to pressure Iraq to curtail flights between Iran and Syria across Iraqi airspace. That supply route opened wide after the U.S. completed its troop withdrawal from Iraq in December, U.S. administration and military officials say.

The next month, the CIA picked up detailed intelligence that Iran was using an Iranian private cargo airline, Yas Air, to fly arms over Iraq to Syria, according to U.S. officials.

With U.S. warplanes no longer patrolling Iraqi skies, the U.S. had few options except to cajole the Iraqis to act. In an official complaint to Baghdad called a démarche, the U.S. demanded an end to the flights, said officials briefed on the discussions. “You’ve got to stop this,” the Americans told Iraqi leaders, according to one senior U.S. official.

The démarche appeared to persuade the Iraqis to act, according to American officials; the flights stopped.

But in late January and early February, the CIA began to track flights of Syrian government AN-76 cargo planes between Syria and Iran, a new tactic.

According to U.S. officials, Syria and Iran sought to disguise the cargo of flights leaving Iran, in some cases with manifests citing flowers and farm equipment. CIA analysts concluded the manifests were false and pointed to the involvement of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps in the flights, said people briefed on the intelligence.

Iran denies providing arms to Syria. A Syrian foreign ministry spokesman called the notion of arms shipments from Iran “baseless.”

In a series of démarches in February and March, U.S. diplomats warned Iraq its failure to act against the flights ran counter to Iraq’s obligations under U.N. Security Council resolutions.

Iraqi leaders were initially dismissive of U.S. intelligence but said they would investigate.

Iraq sent its minister of transportation, Hadi Ameri, to Tehran to discuss the flights, according to U.S. officials. The Iranians said the flights weren’t carrying arms, a message the Iraqis relayed to skeptical U.S. officials. Mr. Ameri couldn’t be reached for comment.

While U.S. and Iraqi officials went back and forth on the issue, several Syrian cargo planes made the trip to Iran and back without interference.

As Iraq prepared to play host to an Arab League meeting at the end of March, which would showcase its emergence from American occupation, U.S. officials raised the possibility Iraq would face disclosures about the flights—an embarrassment because most Arab nations had turned against Mr. Assad.

The warning appeared to get through. Iraqi leaders told the U.S. they might search the suspect flights. Two weeks before the Arab League summit, the flights of the Syrian AN-76 cargo planes abruptly stopped, U.S. officials say.

A spokesman for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said Iraqi authorities routinely stop cargo planes that fly over Iraq to Syria or leave directly from Iraq to Syria to make sure they aren’t carrying arms.

U.S. officials said the effort to block resupply flights continues and includes a renewed focus on Suez Canal traffic.

One ship currently seeking permission to enter the canal is owned by a subsidiary of Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, according to U.S. officials.

The ship, the Amin, has already passed through the canal once, to the chagrin of the U.S. It traveled last month to the Syrian port of Banias, where it is believed to have unloaded gasoline for the Syrian regime and then picked up Syrian crude oil to take to Iran. Now the ship is seeking approval to pass back through the Suez Canal.

U.S. officials tracking the shipment said a subsidiary of Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines has repeatedly changed the Amin’s shipping flags to continue operating despite U.S. and European Union sanctions.

U.S. officials are in negotiations with the Egyptian government in an effort to block the Amin’s return, arguing that it isn’t properly flagged and that it doesn’t have internationally recognized insurance.

—Siobhan Gorman, Jay Solomon and Ali A. Nabhan contributed to this article.

Analysis / Iran and Hezbollah’s terror escalation against Israel

July 23, 2012

Analysis / Iran and Hezbollah’s terror escalation against Israel – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

The strategic goal behind Iran’s present terrorist campaign against Israel is to provoke a regional conflict between Israel and its neighbors which would divert international attention from Iran’s nuclear program.

By Ely Karmon | Jul.22, 2012 | 9:26 AM
Israeli soldiers carry the coffin of Bulgaria terror victim

After a series of failed or foiled terror attempts against Israeli targets this year, Iran and Hezbollah finally staged a “successful” attack. The suicide bombing in Burgas, Bulgaria killed five Israeli tourists and a Bulgarian citizen, and wounded some 30 Israelis.

The current campaign, which began more or less four years ago, is not the first wave of Iran-Hezbollah attacks against Israeli and Jewish targets abroad. The terror campaign of 1994-’95 included a failed March 1994 truck bombing of the Israeli embassy in Bangkok; the July 1994 bombing of the Buenos Aires Jewish community’s AMIA building, in which 85 people were killed and 300 wounded; the July 1994 suicide bombing on a commuter aircraft in Panama, 12 of whose 21 victims were Jews and a Hezbollah cell in Singapore’s 1995 plan to attack Israeli (and American) ships and the Israeli Embassy.

Contemporary assessments viewed the earlier campaign of terror as retaliation to the Israeli bombing of a Hezbollah training camp in Lebanon in which 40 members of the organization were killed. Israeli author-journalist Ronen Bergman claims Tehran retaliated because Israel foiled important Iranian financial negotiations with Europe. Argentinian prosecutors who worked for several years on the AMIA case suggested that Iran ordered the 1994 bombing as a response to Argentina’s suspension of a contract to transfer nuclear technology to Tehran.

The 2006 Second Lebanon War

The connection between Iranian strategic priorities and attacks on Israel itself, as well as Israeli targets abroad, was well-illustrated by the events of 2006. It is likely that the July 2006 escalation on Israel’s Lebanese border, set off by Hezbollah, was the result of six years of strategic planning, as Iran armed its Shi’ite ally with long-range artillery and rockets. Its goal: To trigger a major Middle Eastern military clash which would relieve pressure on Iran and divert international attention from the Islamic Republic’s s nuclear program. It was intended to signal the West, the United States and Israel before that year’s G-8 summit, which took place on July 15, of the results of serious international sanctions or destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities in a U.S. or Israeli attack.

In an interview aired in April 2007, Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem described Iran’s role in his organization’s strategy on all major issues: “When it comes to matters of jurisprudence pertaining to its general direction, as well as to its jihad direction, Hezbollah based itself on the decisions of the supreme legal authority [i.e. Iran’s Ayatollah]. It is he who permits, and it is the supreme legal authority who forbids. Therefore, we covered our jihad position with regard to fighting Israel with the decision of the supreme legal authority…Even with regard to the firing of missiles on Israeli citizens, when they were bombing citizens on our side… even that required general permission based on Islamic law.”

Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader, made it clear in August 2007 that Hezbollah was following Iranian instructions. “In the course of the war and jihad in Lebanon [the Hezbollah leaders] visited the [Iranian supreme] leader [Ayatollah Khamenei] several times. At those meetings, he emphasized time and again the spiritual connection with God, the reliance on God, the connection with the Koran, and prayer,” he said.

The current terrorist campaign

The current terrorist campaign started after the February 2008 assassination in Damascus of senior military-terrorist leader Imad Mughniyeh, who had been linked to major attacks on American, Israeli and Arab targets around the world. Accusing Israel of the assassination, Hezbollah and Iran vowed to extract a painful revenge. (Remarkably, Syrian authorities have never published the results of their investigation of the Mughniyeh assassination or even formally accused Israel of responsibility for it).

Attempts to strike back at Israel were not long in coming. In May of that year, authorities in Azerbaijan uncovered a plan to blow up the Israeli embassy in Baku with a suicide truck. Two Lebanese citizens and four Azeris were sentenced to 15 years in prison for planning the attack, which would also have endangered the Japanese Embassy, located in the same Baku building. Members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRCG) who helped organize the plot escaped to Iran.

Plans to bomb the Israeli embassy and Jewish targets in Baku actually began in 2007, long before Mughniyeh’s assassination. The same Hezbollah cell also intended to bomb the Russian Qabala radar station in Azerbaijan, which Moscow offered to the U.S. in order to monitor Iran.

Terror attacks targeting Israelis abroad since January 2012

However, the wave of attacks appears to have intensified in recent months. Numerous foiled and failed attacks against Israeli targets involving Iranian, Lebanese and local citizens have taken place since January 2012.

Bulgaria The Burgas attack wasn’t the first time this year that Israeli tourists were targeted. In January a suspicious package was spotted on a bus carrying Israeli ski tourists from Turkey to Bulgaria.

Azerbaijan Three men were detained in January after planning to attack two Israelis employed by the Chabad Jewish school in Baku. The trio — Rasim Farail Aliyev, Ali Alihamza Huseynov and Balaqardash Dadashov, an Azeri citizen who lives in the Iranian city of Ardabil – were given smuggled arms and equipment by Iranian agents.

Thailand On January 12, Thai authorities arrested Hussein Atris, a Swedish citizen of Lebanese descent linked to Hezbollah. A month earlier, at the end of 2011, Israeli intelligence alerted Thai officials that two or three suspects with Swedish passports could be planning an attack in Thailand. Atris led Thai police to four tons of explosive precursor in Samut Sakhon province in a commercial building which had been rented since January 2010.

Several weeks later, an Iranian team planning to attack the Israeli ambassador and other Israeli representatives in Bangkok was uncovered after Iranian citizen Saeid Moradi was seriously wounded in a “work accident.” Mohammad Hazaei, whom Thai authorities suspect headed the Iranian operational group, was captured. Other suspects fled: Masoud Sedaghatzadeh managed to reach neighboring Malaysia and a woman, Leila Rohani, escaped. A fifth Iranian, Nikkhahfard Javad, is thought to be an instructor in making bombs authorities said were “strikingly similar” to devices used in later attacks on Israeli diplomats in Georgia and India. Thai police later arrested a sixth operative, Madani Seyed Mehrded, who entered Thailand back in July 2011. A seventh suspect, Norouzi Shaya Ali Akbar, wanted on charges of possessing and making explosives, fled to Iran.

Singapore A plot to assassinate Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak during a mid-February visit was foiled by Singapore authorities in cooperation with the Mossad. Singaporean security agencies arrested three members of a Hezbollah-Iranian terror cell.

India New Delhi Police arrested Indian journalist Syed Mohammed Ahmad Kazmi, a Shi’ite with long-standing Iranian connections who was employed part-time by an Iranian broadcaster, for allegedly facilitating the February 13 bombing of an Israeli Embassy car in which the wife of the Israeli defense attaché was wounded. An Indian court issued arrest warrants for Iranians Housan Afshar, Syed Ali Mehdi Sadr and Mohammed Reza Abolghasemi in connection with the attack. Irani, who had visited Delhi twice and left for Malaysia shortly after the Delhi attack, was in contact with Masoud Sedaghatzadeh, one of the Iranian suspects in the January Bangkok bomb plot, who was later named on an Indian arrest warrant for his role in the New Delhi attack.

Georgia On February 13, the same day that the Israeli diplomatic car was bombed in New Delhi, local police defused a similar device in a car belonging to an Israeli embassy staff worker in Tbilisi, the Georgian capital.

Turkey In mid-March, based on information provided by Israel, Turkish security authorities reportedly foiled an Iranian terror plot against Israel’s diplomatic missions in Istanbul. Four members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Quds Force who entered Turkey from Iran were in possession of weapons and materials to be used in the attacks on Turkish soil.

Kenya In mid-June, Kenyan authorities arrested two Iranians suspected of planning attacks on Israeli and Western targets. Ahmad Abolfathi Mohammad and Sayed Mansour Mousavi were charged with preparing to commit acts of terror and led officials to a 15-kilogram cache of in RDX explosive in Mombasa. This resort city had been the scene of a two-pronged 2002 attack in which a car bomb killed 13 people, including three Israelis, at a local hotel and an anti-aircraft missile was fired at, but missed, an Israeli airliner leaving the local airport. Most of the 100 kg of explosives the two 2012 suspects shipped from Iraq have not been recovered.

South Africa No details are currently available on an Iranian terrorist plot foiled by South African authorities, a plot that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu referred to in passing in his televised comments denouncing the Burgas attack last week.

Cyprus Cypriot authorities on July 7 arrested a 24-year-old Lebanese man traveling on a Swedish passport. The suspect, who admitted he was a Hezbollah operative, had photographs of Israeli targets in his possession, including information on tour buses carrying Israeli tourists and Israeli flights to and from the island.

Bulgaria The identity of the suicide bomber who blew up the bus carrying Israeli tourists at the Burgas airport on July 18 (exactly 18 years after the AMIA bombing in Buenos Aires) has not yet been officially determined. The perpetrator used a fake Michigan driver’s license, and a senior U.S. official has confirmed Israel’s assertion that he was a member of a Hezbollah cell operating in Bulgaria.
Israeli sources calculate that over the past year there had been 20 terrorist attacks or attempts abroad in which Iranians and/or Hezbollah operatives have been involved directly.

Modus operandi

The Iranian/Hezbollah foiled or failed attacks took place in what could be defined as “soft countries” in Asia and Africa, countries where the intelligence and law enforcement agencies are not sufficiently professionally trained to challenge this kind of threat, and where the Iranian and Hezbollah activities are in any event low priority for the local security forces. Additionally, some of the attacks have been aimed at “soft targets” like Israeli tourists or local Jewish facilities where the level of security may be even lower.

Moreover, the Tehran regime apparently has calculated, based on past experience, that the governments of these countries will react leniently and that Tehran will pay only a minimal political price. And indeed, no country where these recent attacks occurred has openly accused the Tehran government of involvement, and no country has taken open and strong diplomatic measures against Iran.

In this respect, the experience of the failed 1994 Bangkok embassy bombing is illustrative: The Iranian citizen involved was sentenced to death by a Thai court – and released after serving four years in jail after Iran applied heavy pressure. So far there has been no serious Thai diplomatic response to Iran regarding this year’s attack, despite the clear involvement of seven or eight Iranian citizens in two planned terror attempts against Israelis this year.

Indian reaction to the February 13 bombing of an Israeli diplomatic car has been lukewarm  at best. A foreign ministry spokesman in New Delhi said that India “will seek the cooperation of the Iranian authorities in bringing those involved in this dastardly attack to justice.” And though the defense relationship between New Delhi and Jerusalem has flourished in recent years, India, the Islamic Republic’s second-biggest oil customer (after China) rushed to buy more Iranian oil, and paid in gold. There were even demonstrations in India after the arrest of Syed Mohammed Ahmad Kazmi, the local journalist accused of involvement in the terror plot.

In Kenya, a country that is on very friendly terms with Israel, a judge released the two would-be terrorists on bail of only $23,000. It will be interesting to see if they appear in court at their trial due to start this week.

According to Reuters, Saudi Arabia last year warned Argentina of a possible Iran-backed plan to attack the Saudi and Israeli embassies in Buenos Aires. The reaction was not what might have been anticipated: Argentina, which indicted six high level Iranian leaders for the 1994 AMIA bombing, reportedly reached out quietly to Iran in an attempt to close the file on the incident.

Only in the case of the United States has a projected attack been targeted at a country Iran does not regard as “soft.” In October 2011, two men, including a member of Iran’s Quds Force unit, were charged in a New York federal court with conspiring to kill the Saudi ambassador to the U.S., using a hired member of the Mexican Zeta drug cartel, perhaps in the hope that the use of a criminal gang would obscure Iranian fingerprints.

Interestingly, Senegal and Gambia, two African countries which had excellent economic and political relations with Iran, cut diplomatic ties with Tehran in late 2010. It was not against a background of terrorist plots against Israel, but due to the fact that it became clear that 13 shipping containers of Iranian arms discovered in the harbor of Lagos, Nigeria, were headed for the Movement of Democratic Forces of Casamance (MDFC) insurgency. The insurgency, in southern Senegal near the Gambian border, posed a threat to the security interests of both countries.

The strategic goal of the Iranian terrorist plots

A U.S. official cited by the New York Times called the Burgas suicide bombing a tit-for-tat retaliation against the assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists over the last couple of years, for which Iran blames Israel and the U.S.

There are also signs that in ordering recent terror attacks, Iranian leaders have been acting under pressure and motivated by emotion. Haaretz military expert Amir Oren recently remarked that “the most worrying aspect of the recent string of Iranian terror attacks in Asia was the evident drive to commit them even though they hadn’t been properly prepared,” not typical of Tehran’s previous deliberate decision-making.

Stress may explain the clumsy way that Iran has mounted these operations as well as Tehran’s apparent disregard for the effect they might have on the countries where they were carried out, through death or injury to their citizens and their negative effect on local tourism.

In this author’s opinion, the real Iranian strategic goal is to provoke a regional conflict between Israel and its neighbors which would divert international attention from Iran’s nuclear program. Tehran realizes that while such attacks might not provoke an Israeli strike on Iran itself, a large number of casualties might prompt an Israeli military response against the home base of Iranian surrogates such as Hezbollah in Lebanon or Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza. The pressure is certainly increasing as Iran loses partners in its “coalition”: Hamas has deserted it in favor of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, the Bashar Assad regime is on its way out in Syria.

The conflict could involve Lebanon, with the willing support of Hezbollah, already massively armed by Iran and Syria, or it could involve Gaza, where a massive missile attack by Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Iran’s proxy, or other minor groups could lure Israel into a major land operation and a possible crisis with Egypt. It could also involve Egypt itself, triggered by border attacks by Iranian-sponsored networks like a Hezbollah group discovered in 2009, or with the help of Palestinian or Bedouin surrogates.

In view of the indiscriminate Iranian terrorist activities on all continents, the international community should act strongly in the diplomatic arena. It should also take practical steps against an Iranian physical presence that could exacerbate existing dangers, including to the upcoming London Olympic Games. In this context, it should be recalled that after Saddam Hussein’s troops occupied Kuwait in 1991, on the eve of the first Gulf War, many countries sought to prevent terror attacks by expelling Iraqi diplomats and suspected intelligence agents who were using diplomatic or business cover.

Dr. Ely Karmon is senior research scholar at the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism in Herzliya.

Assad’s forces overrun two Damascus districts

July 23, 2012

Assad’s forces overrun two Damascus distri… JPost – Middle East.

 

By REUTERS

 

07/23/2012 04:25
Witnesses say young men summarily executed; Rebels seize border post with Turkey, army infantry school.

Smoke is seen rising over Damascus

Photo: REUTERS

BAB AL-SALAM, Syria – Syrian troops have driven rebel fighters out of two districts of Damascus a week after the insurgents launched a major assault on the capital.

Government troops retook control of the Damascus neighborhood of Mezzeh on Sunday and executed at least 20 unarmed men who they suspected of aiding rebels, opposition activists in the district said.

In Barzeh, members of the Syrian army’s Fourth Division under the command of President Bashar Assad’s brother executed several young men during an operation to regain control of the northern Damascus district, a witness and activists said.

Government forces have launched a determined counter-offensive since rebels brought their battle to overthrow Assad to the capital and killed four of the president’s closest associates in a bomb attack last Wednesday.

In a further escalation of a conflict rapidly becoming a civil war, fighting raged around the intelligence headquarters in Syria’s biggest city, Aleppo, and in Deir al-Zor in the east.

Syrian forces regained control of one of two border crossings seized by rebels on the frontier with Iraq, Iraqi officials said, but rebels said they had captured a third border crossing with Turkey: Bab al-Salam, north of Aleppo.

“Seizing the border crossings does not have strategic importance but it has a psychological impact because it demoralizes Assad’s force,” a senior Syrian army defector in Turkey, Staff Brigadier Faiz Amr, told Reuters by phone.

“It’s a show of progress for the revolutionaries, despite the superior firepower of Assad’s troops.”

Rebels also seized an army infantry school in the town of Musalmiyeh, 16 km (10 miles) north of Aleppo, and captured several loyalist officers, while others defected, a senior military defector in Turkey and rebel sources inside Syria said.

“This is of big strategic and symbolic importance. The school has ammunition depots and armoured formations and it protects the northern gate to Aleppo,” Brigadier General Mustafa al-Sheikh told Reuters by phone from the town of Apayden on the Turkish border.

Revenge

The bombardments in Damascus and Deir al-Zor were some of the fiercest yet and showed Assad’s determination to avenge the bomb attack, the most spectacular blow in a 16-month-old uprising against four decades of rule by the Assad family.

Rebels were driven from Mezzeh, the diplomatic district of Damascus, residents and opposition activists said, and more than 1,000 government troops and allied militiamen poured into the area, backed by armored vehicles, tanks and bulldozers.

Government forces executed at least 20 men, aged approximately 20 to 30, several activists said by phone from Mezzeh.

“Most had bullet holes, one with as many as 18. Three had their hands tied behind their back. Some of the men were in their pajamas. Several had their legs broken or fingers missing. Others were stabbed with knifes,” said Bashir al-Kheir, one of the activists.

The early morning bombardment of the neighborhood killed three people and 50 others, mostly civilians, were wounded, said Thabet, a Mezzeh resident. “The district is besieged and the wounded are without medical care,” he said.

“I saw men stripped to their underwear. Three buses took detainees from al-Farouk, including women and whole families. Several houses have been set on fire.”

Opposition and rebel sources say the guerrilla fighters in the capital may lack the supply lines to remain there for long and may have to make tactical withdrawals.

The neighborhood of Barzeh, one of three northern areas hit by helicopter fire, was overrun by troops commanded by P resident Assad’s brother, Maher Assad, 41, who is widely seen as the muscle maintaining the Assad family’s Alawite minority rule.

“At least 20 Fourth Division tanks and hundreds of its members entered Barzeh this afternoon,” opposition activist Abu Kais said by phone from the district.

“I saw troops go into the home of 26-year-old Issa al-Arab. They left him dead with two bullets in his head.”

He said people sheltering from the fighting had told him of the summary execution of a 17-year-old, Issa Wahbeh, who was pulled from the shelter and beaten and killed.

Mazen, another opposition activist in Barzeh, said the bodies had been found of four young men who appeared to have been shot at point blank range.

Syrian state television quoted a media source denying that helicopters had fired on the capital. “The situation in Damascus is normal, but the security forces are pursuing the remnants of the terrorists in some streets,” it said.

Crucial Role

Maher’s role has become more crucial since Assad’s defence and intelligence ministers, a top general and his powerful brother-in-law were killed by the bomb on Wednesday, part of an assault by rebels seeking to turn the tables in a revolt inspired by Arab Spring uprisings in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt.

Assad has not spoken in public since the bombing, but the Israeli military said it believed he was still in Damascus and retained the loyalty of his armed forces.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said 1,261 people had been killed across Syria since last Sunday, when the fighting escalated in Damascus, including 299 of Assad’s forces.

This made it by far the bloodiest week in an uprising that has claimed the lives of 18,000 people. A total of 79 civilians and 24 soldiers were killed on Sunday, the observatory said.

Elsewhere, Iraqi officials said Syrian forces had regained control of the Syrian side of the Yarubiya border crossing, briefly seized by rebels on Saturday.

Iraq has said it cannot help Syrians fleeing the violence, and the border was sealed by the Iraqi army on Friday.

Regional and Western powers fear the conflict might become a full-blown sectarian war that could spill across borders, but have yet to find a coherent strategy to prevent this.

Arab League ministers meeting in Doha urged the opposition and the rebel Free Syrian Army to form a transitional government, Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani told a news conference in Doha.

He said Arab countries would help to ensure safe passage out of Syria for President Assad if he stepped down quickly – something he has shown no inclination to do.

Syrian civil war boosts Israeli-US defense ties

July 23, 2012

Syrian civil war boosts Israeli-US defense tie… JPost – Defense.

07/23/2012 05:01
Officials deny reports that Israel under pressure from DC to refrain from taking unilateral steps against Assad’s chemical weapons.

Chemical WMDs (illustrative)

Photo: Reuters

Israeli-US intelligence and defense ties have reached new heights due to the uprising in Syria and fears the country’s chemical weapons will fall into terrorist hands, defense officials said on Sunday.

The officials denied reports that Israel was under pressure from Washington to refrain from taking unilateral steps – such as military action – to destroy Damascus’s chemical weapons.

“We are working very closely together and there is very close coordination,” one official said, adding that the situation in Syria was at the heart of talks with administration officials, including US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and National Security Adviser Tom Donilon.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, in an interview with the Fox News Sunday program, said his concern in regard to Syria was less about who would replace President Bashar Assad, and more about what could happen to the country’s stockpile of chemical weapons in the chaotic “seamline” when there was no government in control.

“This is a real problem,” the prime minister said. “Can you imagine Hezbollah – the people who are conducting, with Iran, all these terror attacks around the world – [if] they would have chemical weapons? It’s like al-Qaida having chemical weapons.”

Netanyahu said this scenario was unacceptable to Israel, as it was to the US.

“I think that this is something we’ll have to act to stop if the need arises,” he said. “And the need might arise if there is a regime collapse but not a regime change, that is you go into some chaos and these sundry sites are left basically unguarded. Hezbollah can come and pick at it, or some other terror organizations or groups can come and pick at it.

“It’s a great threat,” the prime minister said of the possibility of chemical weapon “leakage.”

Asked whether Jerusalem would act alone or would prefer that the US take the lead, Netanyahu said, “We’ll have to consider our action. But do I seek action? No. Do I preclude it? No.”

Defense Minister Ehud Barak had a similar message earlier in the day, saying that Israel “cannot allow” Syria’s chemical weapons to fall into rogue hands.

“We are watching for the possibility that Hezbollah will try to move advanced weapon systems,” Barak said during a visit to the IDF’s Tel Hashomer induction center to meet with new recruits to the Golani Brigade. “More than this, we cannot know, including when we will act, how we will act and if we will act.”

Barak predicted Assad would fall soon but insisted that it would happen without Israeli involvement.

“The Syrian people will topple him and the only ones who are helping him are Iran and Hezbollah – and despite that assistance he will still fall,” Barak said.

Barak’s senior subordinate, Maj.-Gen. (res.) Amos Gilad, said on Sunday that Assad’s forces were still in control of the chemical weapons facilities. But on Friday, Barak told Israeli TV stations that he had ordered the IDF to prepare operational contingency plans to prevent the proliferation of chemical weapons in Syria.

Syria is said to have one of the largest chemical weapons arsenals in the world, with thousands of bombs that can be dropped from the air alongside dozens of warheads that can be installed on Scud missiles. In addition, in the late ’90s, the US warned that Damascus was developing warheads that could detonate in midair and disperse smaller bomblets packed with various nerve agents.

Israel has several options. One possibility could be to attack from the air convoys of chemical weapons or bases where the weapons are stored. The fear though is that such a strike, even if conducted in the twilight of Assad’s regime, would spark an all-out war with Syria, Hezbollah and possibly Iran.

Two hours for Syrian chemical weapons to reach Lebanon. Four armies prepared

July 23, 2012

Two hours for Syrian chemical weapons to reach Lebanon. Four armies prepared.

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report July 22, 2012, 10:47 PM (GMT+02:00)

 

Syrian WMD-capable missiles

The IDF, the Turkish and Jordanian armies and US Middle East forces have switched to preparedness mode in the last few hours in case the Syrian chemical weapons arsenal starts moving west toward Lebanon, debkafile’s military sources report.

Acting in unison, those armies are on the ready for instantaneous action because it would take no more than two hours to cover the distance from Syria to the Hizballah-controlled Bakaa Valley of east Lebanon. Their arrival there, unless thwarted, would mean a war on Hizballah.

Therefore Israeli and US military chiefs prefer to stop the arsenal in its tracks before it moves across the border. This would call for surgically precise, rapid action against a target going to extreme lengths to stay concealed.

In the view of a senior US military source quoted by debkafile, the risk is solid but it comes from a different direction. He stressed that “President Assad has not decided to hand over his chemical weapons to Hizballah, nor has Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah decided to accept them.”

The chemical stockpile is kept at the al-Safira base northwest of Damascus in the care of the president’s personal guard unit which takes orders from Bashar Assad and no one else. If the heads of that guard saw the regime suddenly collapse – as it was expected to do last Wednesday when assassins murdered the men closest to the president – the American official says, “It is impossible to predict how they will act or what use they will make of the weapons systems under their guard.”

“They may decide to sneak out of Syria to Lebanon and take with them the entire arsenal as insurance for their safety and future,” he suggested.
According to our military sources, the arsenal which could be spirited across to Lebanon contains a lot more than chemical weapons. It also includes Scud C and Scud D surface missles capable of delivering chemical warheads and also the Russian-made advanced Pantsyr-S1 (NATO codenamed SA-22 Greyhound) anti-air missiles, which have been guarding the chemical stocks.

This background accounts for the words used by Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak Sunday, July 22, to make their intentions clear:
“Israel would have to act if the Syrian regime collapsed without changing and if there’s a risk Syria’s chemical weapons and missiles could fall into the hands of military groups,” such as Hizballah or al Qaeda, Netanyahu said.

Asked if Israel would act alone, he said that Syria’s stockpile was a “common concern” – hinting at the coordination in place between the Israeli, Turkish and Jordanian armies and US regional forces.
Barak was more specific:  “I’ve ordered the Israeli military to prepare for a situation where we would have to weigh the possibility of carrying out an attack against Syrian weapons arsenals.” He told reporters.

”The state of Israel cannot accept a situation where advanced weapons systems are transferred form Syria to Lebanon.”

Why Bibi won’t go ‘Michael Corleone’

July 23, 2012

Why Bibi won’t go ‘Michael Corleone’ – NYPOST.com.

Benny Avni

Last week’s deadly terrorist attack against Israelis in Bulgaria may indeed prompt a “strong” response, as top Jerusalem officials warned — but not quite yet.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu immediately blamed Iran for last Wednesday’s bombing at a Bulgarian airport of a bus carrying Black Sea-bound vacationers. It killed five Israelis and the driver, and wounded dozens more.

Israeli officials say that forensic “fingerprints” of Tehran and its terrorist arm, the Lebanese-based Hezbollah, were clearly at the scene, and US intelligence officials backed them up.

Netanyahu: Now juggling multiple dire threats to Israel.

AP
Netanyahu: Now juggling multiple dire threats to Israel.

Tehran and its pawns had failed in several recent attempts to retaliate for the killing of Iran’s top nuclear scientists. Plus, every year in the four since the assassination of its legendary terror master Imad Moughniyeh, Hezbollah has tried a revenge attack on the anniversary.

It finally pulled off a successful hit.

True, these weren’t military officials, diplomats or other “quality” targets. All Iran’s terror operation could manage was the softest of targets, tourists. Still, Hezbollah and Iran did finally evade intelligence and tightening defense procedures to slaughter some Israelis. And they did it with much fanfare.

Nor is it over. London’s Sunday Times reported yesterday that the terror masters are planning to hit Israeli athletes arriving in Britain this week for the Olympics.

So Israel — after long warning that it would act, perhaps militarily, to end Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons — now has a clear justification for war. And Netanyahu has already drawn a direct line between Burgas and Iran’s nuclear facilities. “Just imagine what the consequence would be if these people [Hezbollah] and if this regime [Iran] got ahold of nuclear weapons,” he said on CBS yesterday.

So what will he do? “Expose the terrorists, stop the terrorists, and make sure that the world’s most dangerous regime doesn’t get the world’s most dangerous weapon.” Thus speculation is again rife that an attack on Iran is just around the corner.

But Netanyahu has reason for caution — and not just the possible impact of the strike on US or Israeli politics.

Before attacking Iran, for example, he must neutralize Tehran’s planned retaliation — specifically, the tens of thousands of rockets and missiles that Hezbollah (with Iran’s aid) has amassed in Lebanon, weapons that can hit every Israeli city.

But even that formidable task now must await other developments, mostly in Syria.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is in Israel today; last week it was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and National Security Adviser Tom Donilon — all suddenly rushing to “coordinate” with Israel on Syria.

After months of ignoring Jerusalem while trying to solve the Syria crisis through the United Nations (where Israel remains “feh”), Team Obama has realized Israel can help in the aftermath of Bashar Assad’s impending fall.

But the administration’s top goal seems to be dissuading Israel from taking out Syria’s chemical and biological stockpiles, fearing they might soon fall into the hands of Hezbollah or al Qaeda types with designs on targets in the lands of “Crusaders and Zionists.”

Washington’s worried about these weapons of mass destruction, of course — but it fears the Arab reaction to any Israeli strike.

To review: Before attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities, Israel must disable Hezbollah’s war machine. But even before that, it must make sure Syria’s WMDs don’t fail into the wrong hands. And all the while, it must take into account heavy pressure from a White House eager to put the world on hold until November.

With so much going on, the most likely immediate action (if any) would be a well-chosen, pinpoint target.

Sure, there’s always the Michael Corleone approach: Take out all your enemies at once. In a very dangerous neighborhood, such holistic approach can be an attractive option.

Still, at least until things in Syria clear up a bit, Israel will likely sit on its hands a while.

But not forever.

For Israel, winds of war in Syria are blowing aside other issues – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

July 23, 2012

For Israel, winds of war in Syria are blowing aside other issues – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

There’s no doubt that Israel is facing a complex reality, with more varied and serious threats than we’ve seen before.

By Zvi Bar’el | Jul.23, 2012 | 1:39 AM
Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak touring IDF outpost in the Golan Heights, July 19, 2012.

The endless debate over attacking Iran notwithstanding, in recent days Israel’s attention has been primarily focused on what’s going on in the northern arena.

Evidence of this is the frequency with which the senior defense brass has been paying visits to the Northern Command divisions. Chief of General Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz toured the 91st Division on the Lebanon border yesterday, and Defense Minister Ehud Barak visited the 36th Division on the Golan Heights this past Thursday.

Barak and Gantz are in agreement that the Assad regime’s days are numbered; what’s uncertain is when it will fall. Israel has publicly declared its concern for what might happen to Syria’s stockpile of chemical weapons and missiles when President Bashar Assad loses control.

The second cause for worry is Hezbollah (which would presumably be the primary recipient of arms transferred from Syria ). There is concern the Shi’ite group might try another terror attack at an Israeli target abroad, following the suicide bombing of the tourist bus in Bulgaria. Another “success” by Hezbollah, or even an effort to deter the group from trying again, could spur an Israeli operation against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was criticized last week for first blaming Iran for the bus bombing and then switching the blame to Hezbollah. But when it comes to terror abroad, the two are essentially one. The Quds Force of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and Hezbollah’s terror infrastructure are in close cooperation. Nearly all the 20 attempted attacks that were foiled over the past few years were co-productions.

Less understandable are the declarations by Israeli leaders regarding the events in Syria and Bulgaria. Barak, who spoke yesterday to new recruits at the Israel Defense Forces Induction Center at Tel Hashomer, declared yet again that “the State of Israel cannot accept the transfer of advanced weapons systems from Syria to Lebanon,” and added that we were facing “a worldwide campaign of increased terror,” led by Hezbollah, inspired by Iran.

Netanyahu, at the start of yesterday’s cabinet meeting, promised to “vigorously fight terror.” He was interviewed by Fox News and warned that Hezbollah with chemical weapons is akin to Al-Qaida with chemical weapons and swore to “expose those who stand behind terror.”

All this raises the question of whether Israeli leaders want to act against the potential threats from its enemies, to deter those from carrying out any of their dastardly plans, or just to talk about doing so. There’s no belittling the recent developments in the region. There’s no doubt that Israel is facing a complex reality, with more varied and serious threats than we’ve seen before.

But the question is whom all these public remarks are serving (will Netanyahu and Barak’s words really deter Hezbollah from another terror attack?). Or is the main purpose of these comments to keep the eternal flame of security worries burning and distract Israelis from other issues? It’s hard to miss, for example, how the storm over the draft of yeshiva students seems to have suddenly dissipated.