Archive for July 19, 2012

No rush to war in Israel over Bulgaria bombing

July 19, 2012

No rush to war in Israel over Bulgaria bombing: Thomson Reuters Business News – MSN Money.

JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Israel signaled on Thursday it would not hasten into any open conflict with Iran or its Lebanese guerrilla ally Hezbollah despite blaming them for a deadly attack on its citizens in Bulgaria.

A suicide bomber killed eight people on a bus carrying Israeli tourists in Burgas airport, drawing a pledge by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to “react powerfully” to what he called “Iranian terror”.

Sofia officials have not publicly assigned blame for the bombing, nor has there been comment from Iran or Hezbollah.

Netanyahu’s assertion, based on Israel’s long-running suspicions that Iranian and Hezbollah agents are waging a covert campaign against its interests abroad, prompted speculation in local media that the Netanyahu government might strike now.

Israel has long threatened to resort to military force to curb Tehran’s disputed nuclear programme, but Defense Minister Ehud Barak sounded more nuanced on Thursday about a response to the Bulgaria attack.

Speaking on Israel Radio he said the country would “do everything possible in order to find those responsible, and those who dispatched them, and punish them” – language that appeared to suggest covert action against individuals.

Israel may be reluctant to cross Western partners by rushing into a long-range war which would stretch its military capabilities and possibly draw Iranian reprisals against U.S. interests and disruptions of the global oil supply.

A clash with Hezbollah, which the Israeli military says has stockpiled as many as 80,000 rockets in neighboring Lebanon, carries the risk of igniting Israel’s northern border while it watches with concern the turmoil in neighboring Syria.

“RISK MANAGEMENT”

Giora Eiland, a retired Israeli army general who served as national security adviser from 2003 to 2006, played down the possibility that the Bulgaria bombing would push Netanyahu into another war.

“I think that any response, whatever it may be, will not be an immediate response,” Eiland told Israel Radio separately.

“Any response, whatever it may be, will not be in the form of an air force operation, or strike – certainly not in Iran over this matter, nor in Lebanon.”

Barak, who focused on Hezbollah’s alleged role in the Bulgaria bombing, described it as the bloodiest of a series of recent plots against Israelis, including diplomats, abroad.

Iran denied involvement in previous attacks but some analysts believe it is trying to avenge the assassination of scientists from its nuclear programme, which it blamed on Israel and Western allies. Iran says its atomic ambitions are peaceful, denying foreign allegations of secret military designs.

Hezbollah has its own scores to settle with Israel. Two years after their 2006 border war, the Lebanese Shi’ite militia lost its commander, Imad Moughniyeh, to a Damascus car bomb it said was the work of Israeli spies, and vowed revenge.

Netanyahu’s national security adviser from 2009 to 2011, Uzi Arad, confirmed in a separate interview that Israel killed Moughniyeh – though the country has never formally claimed responsibility.

Arad described the Bulgaria bombing as part of a “dynamic of escalation” but counseled Israel to invest in better intelligence and security.

He said “risk management” was required and that Wednesday’s bloodshed may be an “unavoidable price” of internal and international pressure building on Iran and its allies.

(Writing by Dan Williams, Editing by Jeffrey Heller and Jon Boyle)

Bibi Blames Iran for Terror Attack While U.S. Navy Waits Offshore

July 19, 2012

Bibi Blames Iran for Terror Attack While U.S. Navy Waits Offshore | Danger Room | Wired.com.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For at least a year, the U.S. has tried to keep Israel from attacking Iran, usually by arguing that sanctions on Tehran are working and that American can hit harder if it comes to a fight. It’s a delicate balance, especially since President Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanhayu trust each other only slightly more than they trust Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Now Iran might have upset the balance — even though Iran has an entire arsenal of U.S. guns floating just off its shores.

On Wednesday, a terrorist attack killed at least seven Israeli civilians vacationing in Bulgaria. Netanyahu immediately blamed Iran, and promised a “strong response against Iranian terror.”

Maybe Iran pulled the trigger. Maybe it didn’t. Netanyahu’s defense minister, Ehud Barak, was far less categorical. He said the attack was saying “initiated probably by Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad or another group under the terror auspices of either Iran or other radical Islamic groups.” Regardless, he promised to “settle the account” with whoever was responsible for the strike.

If Iran actually was behind the attack, it did so in spite of having a massive amount of U.S. naval power aimed at it. The U.S. has quietly but persistently built up a massive naval presence around Iran that outclasses most of the world’s navies. It’s about to launch a huge exercise with over 20 nations that will demonstrate how to defeat an anticipated Iranian tactic. And this doesn’t even get into anything the U.S. does with Israel.

Even before word of the Bulgaria attack reached the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta gave Iran his best come-at-me-bro. Should Iran decide to close the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for global oil shipping, he said, “We’ve invested in capabilities to ensure that the Iranian attempt to close down shipping in the Gulf is something that we are going to be able to defeat.”

And how. On Monday, the Navy and U.S. Central Command announced that they’re going to call the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis back to the Mideast four months ahead of schedule, so the Navy can maintain two aircraft carrier strike groups near Iran for the foreseeable future. No other nation on earth has two full-sized aircraft carriers; the Navy is parking two of them near Iran as an unsubtle threat.

It’s not just the carriers. Over the past several months, the Navy has sent a lot of hardware to the Persian Gulf. Extra patrol craft retrofitted with Gatling guns and missiles. Littoral Combat Ships. Minesweepers. MH-53 Sea Stallion helicopters. Advanced torpedos. A new kind of underwater drone. A new kind of floating base. A new special-operations task force.

Beyond that, two months from now, 20 nations will come together for a ten-day naval drill practicing how to defeat mines placed in Mideast waterways. The Pentagon swears that the exercise has nothing to do with Iran, but that’s nonsense. Mining the Strait of Hormuz is a recent theme of Iranian rhetoric, and nothing will spur nearly two dozen countries into concerted action faster than the disruption of 20 percent of the world’s oil. For ten days in September, Iran will watch lots of militaries practice how to defeat it.

On the other hand, Iran might have good reasons for thinking an attack on Israel made sense. Its nuclear scientists — who are civilians, remember — keep getting killed. The Stuxnet worm targeting its nuclear infrastructure was all-but-officially outed as U.S.-Israeli collaboration, as was the complex piece of spyware known as Flame. Elements within the regime might think the U.S. doesn’t respond forcefully to Iranian provocations.

All of these things can be true. Nations miscalculate their interests all the time. But none of that changes the objective fact that the stronger party is floating off the coast of Iran, and it’s building strength in the region by the day.

Don’t hold back – it’s now or never

July 19, 2012

Don’t hold back – it’s now or never | Jerusalem Post – Blogs.

Don’t hold back. Now’s the time. There will never be a better one (with all due condolences and comfort to those who have already been wounded, maimed, or sacrificed).

It’s now or never. Hezbullah in Lebanon, the Syrian Air Force and its stock of WMD’s now being taken out according to reports – putting an end to that threat forever, while at the same time making the crucial contribution to ending in its tracks the horrific slaughter going on in the towns and villages among brave and innocent people there.

And finally Iran –  three in one (the opportunity presented by the uprising on the streets of Teheran three years ago was missed and further slaughter then proceeded there).

The planes should already be off and need no send-off from me, an outsider and non-combatant; but those who know are ready. We all know that.

Nor should anyone’s permission be asked or need to be asked. The opposite. It’s completely clear and any person with any sanity will completely understand. As for the others, what can or need one say?

This is the time – everyone knows that and neither you, nor your government need any advice or to hear it from the likes of or from anyone like me.

Therefore, I shall shut my mouth and have nothing more to say on this subject in this blog (which many will no doubt applaud) – originally I was going to leave the whole blog blank and rest my case on just the title. It’s all completely obvious anyhow.

Unfortunately, the Sarajevo moment has arrived – and the sooner the better. Don’t wait for Shabat – the Lord will understand the work that needs to be done. It has always been understood that saving a life (in this case a nation) outweighs the Shabat.

In closing, once more my condolences to all who are bereaved, in mourning, or in pain – not that that would make the slightest bit of difference or help anyone in their position a single jot.

One realizes that. But still, may they be comforted if they can be.

As for the rest, don’t hold back; it’s now or never – the time is now.

Analysis: Syrian civil war enters new phase

July 19, 2012

Analysis: Syrian civil war enters new phas… JPost – Middle East.

By JONATHAN SPYER
07/19/2012 02:56
The rebels are winning. But the latest events do not yet herald the beginning of the regime’s last stand.

Syrian residents gather in front of bodies

Photo: REUTERS

For most of the past 16 months, the insurgency against the regime of President Bashar Assad has been confined to certain specific areas of the country. Assad has also managed to keep the top levels of his own elite intact, and largely loyal.

The regime has done its utmost to preserve this situation, and above all to maintain quiet in the two largest cities of the country, the capital Damascus, and Aleppo.

But the regime has failed.

The clashes in Damascus this week, the growing stream of defections and yesterday’s bomb attack on the National Security Building in the capital, set the seal on the failure. The deaths of Defense Minister Daoud Rajiha, Assad’s brother-in- law Assef Shawkat and former chief of staff Hassan Turkmani in a bomb attack on a meeting of senior officials in Damascus exemplify the sharp erosion in the regime’s position in recent weeks.

The intelligence required for such an operation indicates that individuals close to the Assad regime’s inner sanctum are now providing information to its enemies. However, observation of the fighting in Damascus suggests the latest developments do not yet represent the climactic battle for the control of Syria.

The trend of events in the Syrian civil war is clear. Assad’s power and options are dwindling; those of the rebels are growing.

But the dictator is not yet finished.

While the outbreak of fighting in Damascus this week appeared to erupt out of nowhere, this was not the case. That misleading impression derives from the inadequacy of media coverage because of restrictions imposed by the regime. In reality, the security situation in Damascus has been deteriorating for some time.

Rebels fought government forces in the Kfar Soussa district in mid-June. These clashes were seen by many Damascus residents as the writing on the wall.

A large number of middle- and upper-middle-class Syrians have left the city over the past months. The overt security presence on the streets of the capital has sharply increased.

The immediate cause of the fighting this week, meanwhile, was a regime initiative, rather than one undertaken by the Free Syrian Army. The government wanted to drive out FSA fighters from a number of Damascus neighborhoods. It therefore began the shelling of the Tadamon area, close to downtown Damascus, as a first step.

The rebels fought back, challenging government armor, and the fighting spread to a number of other areas, most notably the Midan district.

The FSA rushed large numbers of fighters toward the capital, to take advantage of the breakdown of order in the city. The decision by the regime to abandon the last pretenses of normality, in order to try to prevent the erosion of its position in Damascus, is testimony to its increasingly beleaguered position.

Still, opposition fighters confirmed that despite the public proclamations, the FSA sees the current clashes in the city as a test of strength between the sides, rather than the final, climactic confrontation.

Two things should be noted regarding the latest events: First, the steeply improved performance of the rebels over the last three months is the result of increased aid to the FSA and other elements from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey. There are credible claims of US intelligence involvement in this process, and less clear rumors of involvement of Western special forces in the training of the rebels.

The improved capabilities of the rebels are being felt in the realities of the combat on the ground. They are now inflicting a steady toll on the government forces, averaging 150 killed and wounded daily. It also looks likely that the FSA was responsible for the bomb attack in Damascus.

Second, the pattern of regime activity suggests that Assad does not believe the battle will be decided in Damascus. Rather, the regime is currently engaged in a process of ethnic cleansing in the north-west of the country.

It is trying to carve out an area of purely Alawite population west of Homs and Hama cities.

The recent massacres in Tremseh and Houla appear to constitute elements of this plan.

Once this Alawite enclave is achieved, it will then form the baseline for further conflict between Alawites and Sunnis in Syria.

As Assad’s forces lose control of increasing parts of the country, they are attempting to consolidate their position in the areas still under their power, including the capital. They are doing so by all available means, including helicopter gunships and artillery fire on civilian neighborhoods. The pretense of normality is a luxury the regime can no longer afford.

So the outbreak of fighting in Damascus and the attack on Assad’s inner sanctum represent an important turning point in the Syrian civil war.

The rebels are winning. But the latest events do not yet herald the beginning of the regime’s last stand.

That moment has not yet arrived. When it does, it may well not take place in Damascus.

Will Israel respond now?

July 19, 2012

Will Israel respond now? – Israel Opinion, Ynetnews.

Op-ed: Given sensitive Mideast situation, Israel may put off response to Bulgaria attack

Published: 07.19.12, 00:43 / Israel Opinion

The terror attack at the Bulgaria airport is an almost exact repeat of the attack thwarted by Bulgarian security forces in January of this year. Back then, a bus full of Israeli tourists was supposed to be blown up using explosives snuck into it. Yet this time around there was no warning, and the murderous terror attack was not curbed. The flight in question was a Bulgarian charter, and such flights – as well as the buses that carry their passengers – are not secured.

By looking into the hallmarks of the bomb, it would be possible to determine who stands behind it. Apparently, it’s Hezbollah’s terror apparatus in conjunction with the al-Quds force of Iran’s Revolutionary guards. These elements tend to make use of local infrastructure, that is, collaborators who help people arriving from the outside or who carry out the attack.

The bombing thwarted in January of this year was the work of Hezbollah members planning to avenge the 2008 assassination of Imad Mugniyah, the group’s operational chief. Mugniyah murdered dozens of Israelis and hundreds of Americans, and his assassination constituted a grave blow for both Hezbollah and Iran. He was also one of Syrian President Bashar Assad’s loyalists.

Yet this time around, there was clearly an intelligence gap that must be looked into. This is not necessarily a failure, because in the field of counter-terrorism, as the case in other areas, some intentions and plans occasionally slip by spy agencies, including the most advanced ones.

We can also assume that Hezbollah’s international terror apparatus drew lessons from the failures it and Iran sustained in the past year, when they attempted to operate in Thailand, Tbilisi and in other sites in Asia in order to avenge the killings of Iranian nuclear scientists.

Unanswered questions

About two months ago, a terror warning was issued regarding a possible attack in Bulgaria, but it was withdrawn. It is also unclear whether Bulgarian police merely thwarted the January attack, or also detained and questioned the perpetrators – and if so, were they also questioned by other spy agencies. All of this must be examined in order to draw lessons.

The more burning question at this time is how Israel will respond to the attack. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promised to do it “in force,” and Jerusalem officials previously declared that they will hold Hezbollah responsible for any attack on Israelis overseas, which will be treated as if it targeted Israelis in Israeli territory.

However, given the current situation in the Middle East, which is both uncertain and sensitive, much thought should be invested here.

The elements that require reconsideration are the Iranian nuke issue currently on the agenda, including the possibility of a military operation; a possible collapse of the Syrian regime, which greatly concerns Hezbollah and Iran and may prompt both to act in an unpredictable manner; and, of course, the still unstable regime in Egypt and the sensitive situation in Jordan.

All of the above require Israel to carefully consider whether to respond now, or wait for an opportune time and then settle the score with the perpetrators via a surgical strike.

Anti-Israel attacks to mount in sync with Syrian war, looming strike on Iran

July 19, 2012

Anti-Israel attacks to mount in sync with Syrian war, looming strike on Iran.

DEBKAfile Special Report July 19, 2012, 9:54 AM (GMT+02:00)

 

Israeli victims of Bulgarian bus blast

The tactics Iran, Syria and Hizballah have set out for escalating their terrorist attacks on Israel differentiate between “local” and high-value “strategic” targets.

They have now decided to up the assaults on the latter to keep pace with the worsening war situation in Syria and the approach of an attack on Iran’s nuclear program. This is reported by debkafile’s intelligence and counter-terror sources.
Iranian terror planners classify the blowing up of the Bulgarian bus Wednesday, July 18 as “local” notwithstanding its “success” in killing at least seven Israelis and wounding more than thirty.
Destroying an Israeli passenger plane in Limassol, Cyprus, or assassinating an Israeli ambassador, in which they have failed so far, would have been “strategic” as would key Israeli security figures, politicians, business executives and Israel’s Mediterranean oil and gas fields.

Just by coincidence, two major episodes occurred on the same day only hours apart – a large hole was struck in Bashar Assad’s inner circle with the deaths in Damascus of half the management of his killing machine against the Syrian opposition and, soon after, the Israeli tour bus was blown up by means still under investigation.
This chance synchronicity heralds a new period of horrific Middle East violence which will reach not only Israel, but the United States and the West as well.
This realization was uppermost in the conversation between US President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Thursday morning, July 19. Neither doubted that Tehran and Damascus were hatching retribution for the assassination of top Syrian ministers.

They had information missing from media reports on the two events, including the news that straight after the deadly attack on Assad’s henchmen, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called an Iranian leadership conference which lasted most of Wednesday and was punctuated with frequent phone calls by Iranian officials to the Syrian President.
The content of those phone calls reaching reached Obama and Netanyahu showed clearly which way the wind was blowing in Damascus and Tehran: Neither intended pulling their punches.
The US and Israeli leaders agreed to work together in the investigation of the bus explosion in Bulgaria.
Our sources stress that this is just diplomaticspeak for holding off on action. Despite Netanyahu’s pledge of a “strong response” to the attack, it was decided that a proactive response to the attack by striking an Iranian or Hizballah target would exacerbate a situation which US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta described as “spinning out of control.”
Israelis have learned in the three years of Netanyahu’s tenure as prime minister that expressions like “strong,” “forceful,” “determined” “we cannot tolerate” etc. mean just the opposite. Israel’s enemies also understand him to mean that he will sit tight and do nothing.
However, an escalation of attacks on Israeli “strategic targets” predicted by intelligence experts in the coming days may make this do-nothing policy untenable. After all, talking to Obama won’t deflect Iran, Syria and Hizballah from their resolve to vent their urge for revenge on Israel.
Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah has often managed to stay a step or two ahead of US and Israeli thinking – especially in his propaganda campaigns – ever since he surprised Israel by launching the Second Lebanon War in the summer of 2006.
A few hours after the attacks in Bulgaria and Damascus, Nasrallah had found his tongue and was crowing:
“We know what your [Israel’s] first strike will be and we promise you a big surprise.”

His words were a warning to Israel and a message to Washington that anyone trying to reach the bunker in which he has been hiding since 2006 was in for a big surprise.

Israel was painfully reminded of the Iranian C-802 shore-to-ship missile fired from the Lebanese coast which surprised and crippled the unready INS Hanit missile ship exactly six years ago.

Israeli rescue crews to begin evacuating wounded from Bulgaria as death toll rises | The Times of Israel

July 19, 2012

Israeli rescue crews to begin evacuating wounded from Bulgaria as death toll rises | The Times of Israel.

Bulgarian PM says suicide bomber with American passport carried out attack; Hercules planes to be used to transport injured home

July 19, 2012, 6:00 am Updated: July 19, 2012, 7:36 am

An unidentified injured Israeli tourist is carried in front of Bourgas hospital after an explosion at Bourgas airport, Bulgaria on July 18, 2012 (photo credit: AP/Bulphoto Agency)

Israeli rescue teams flown to Bulgaria began evacuating wounded from the resort town of Bourgas Thursday morning, as reports emerged that the deadly attack on a bus of tourists was carried out by a man with a fake American passport.

 

The death toll in the bombing on a bus of Israelis at the airport in Bourgas rose in the early hours of Thursday as one of the seriously injured victims succumbed to their wounds. Six of the dead are Israeli, and the Bulgarian bus driver was also killed.

 

Two victims remain in serious condition at a hospital in the capital of Sofia. The rest of the 34 wounded are in a local hospital or still at the airport in Bourgas waiting to be flown home by Israeli rescue teams.

 

On Thursday morning, Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov said the attack was likely carried out by a suicide bomber who likely detonated as he boarded the bus. It was previously thought the bomb had been in a suitcase placed on the bus.

 

The suicide bomber is one of the eight dead, officials said.

 

The suicide bomber was reportedly carrying an American passport and a driver’s license from Michigan, both thought to be fake, the Sofia News Agency reported.

 

In security video, the Caucasian man is seen walking around the premises for at least an hour, dressed in sports attire, the agency reported.

 

The American security agencies FBI and CIA have joined the investigation into the attack, along with Israeli and Bulgarian officials.

 

Bourgas is a popular vacation spot among Israelis, especially teenagers. About 40 people were on the bus when the bomb ripped through it Wednesday afternoon.

 

A ZAKA emergency rescue and ritual burial team prepares for its flight to Bourgas, Bulgaria, on July 18, 2012. (photo credit: Yossi Zeliger/Flash90)

A ZAKA emergency rescue and ritual burial team prepares for its flight to Bourgas, Bulgaria, on July 18, 2012. (photo credit: Yossi Zeliger/Flash90)

 

A member of the Magen David Adom crew in Bulgaria said the wounded tourists would be flown back to Israel for treatment.

 

A number of large Hercules planes are being used to begin returning the injured to Israel Thursday morning. Bulgaria has also announced an airbus plane owned by the government would be used to fly Israelis home.

 

“Our goal is to return all the Israelis home in a matter of hours,” one MDA official told Ynet news.

 

Other Israelis who had been on the flight along with the bombed passengers complained Thursday morning that they were being held in the terminal, without being allowed to return to Israel or enter Bulgaria.

 

“They aren’t organized,” one passenger told Israel Radio. “We just want to go to our hotel and have a rest and then return to Israel.”

 

Smoke rising from the Sarafovo Airport in Burgas, Bulgaria, after a terror attack on an Israeli tour bus, July 18, 2012. (photo credit: JTA/Burgasinfo)

Smoke rising from the Sarafovo Airport in Burgas, Bulgaria, after a terror attack on an Israeli tour bus, July 18, 2012. (photo credit: JTA/Burgasinfo)

 

Others caught in the attack, including some of whom were lightly wounded in the blast in a bus next to the one that exploded, have refused to leave the airport for their hotels or undergo treatment in Bulgaria, saying they would rather return home to be checked out, according to Ynet news.

 

Also Thursday morning, a number of vacationers in Bourgas began returning to Israel as flights out of the Black Sea town resumed.

 

The returning vacationers were not caught in the bombing at the Bourgas airport, but their scheduled return flights were delayed by the closure of commercial flights after the terror attack.

The return of the black, burned out bus, Israel’s worst nightmare

July 19, 2012

West of Eden-Israel News – Haaretz Israeli News source..

The terror attack in Bulgaria ends an eight-year lull in bus bombings and is an ominous omen of worse that’s yet to come.

By Chemi Shalev | Jul.19, 2012 | 1:38 AM

A picture shows destroyed buses after a bomb explosion at Bourgas airport on  July 18, 2012.

For Israelis, the image of a black, burned out hull of a bombed passenger bus fills the same role as a photo of the Twin Towers engulfed in smoke and fire does for Americans: it is a satanic symbol of their worst nightmares, a dreaded icon of their most fearful days, a picture of pure evil that remains etched in their minds, no matter how hard they might try to erase it.

After an eight year lull since the last Israeli bus was bombed in Be’er Sheva in 2004, that terrifying token reappeared yesterday in Burgas, Bulgaria in a terrorist incident that immediately conjured, despite the fact that it took place abroad, those dark days of the Second Intifada that many Israeli had hoped, against their better judgment, would never return.  It was at once both a terrible personal tragedy for the casualties and their family, but also an ominous national omen that the relative respite is over, and that worse is yet to come.

It truly was only a matter of time, as most everyone realized but preferred to ignore.  Israeli counter terrorism experts repeatedly warned in recent months that the threat to Israelis abroad had never been greater. After the foiled or botched terrorist attacks in Cyprus and Kenya and Turkey and Thailand and Azerbaijan, one of the efforts was bound to “succeed” and to take its mortal toll. It was the wicked fate of the innocent tourists seeking a cheap summer deal in Bulgaria that they were the ones who had to pay the ultimate price for the murderous obsessions of Israel’s worst enemies.

Some criticized Prime Minister Netanyahu’s supposedly hasty accusation against Iran, but his mistake, if at all, was most likely one of appearances, not substance. In the past year, Israeli intelligence agencies have been swamped with reports of Iranian agents or their Hezbollah proxies roaming the globe in search of a weak spot in which they could strike. Only four days ago, such an agent was apprehended in Cyprus, in Kenya a few weeks before, and throughout the past few months in other locales where the interdictions were more decisive but did not necessarily make the headlines.

But everyone knew that the intelligence agencies and local police forces would eventually run out of fingers with which to plug the holes in the dike, and that some Israelis would be made to pay the price. With Iran obsessed with what it perceives to be appropriate retaliation for the killing of its nuclear scientists and Hezbollah hell bent on reprisal for the 2008 assassination of its hero Imad Mughniye, and both increasingly frustrated by their repeated failures, a successful attack was bound to happen and its tragic results were bound to be.

Appearing on Fox News, former American Ambassador to the UN John Bolton quickly predicted – some would say with barely disguised glee – that Israel would retaliate directly against Iran and that a “major escalation” was in the offing. Sooner or later, one suspects, Bolton will be proven right: the sky is darkening, the clouds are gathering and the bloody confrontation that most everyone fears – except for Bolton and his cohorts, perhaps – indeed seems closer than ever before.  Between the bomb that decapitated Syria’s security apparatus in Damascus and the one that left dead bodies near a charred emblem in Bulgaria, it is hard to escape the notion that wheels have been set in motion and that the writing is right there on the wall, clear and terrifying, for all to see.

Israel official: Suicide bomber attacked Israelis in Bulgaria, eighth body found

July 19, 2012

Israel official: Suicide bomber attacked Israelis in Bulgaria, eighth body found – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

New investigative direction counters previous estimates, according to which bomb was planted in Burgas tour bus; authorities say suspected perpetrator carried U.S. passport.

By Barak Ravid and Yaniv Kubovich | Jul.19, 2012 | 7:41 AM
A man and a woman react after an explosion at Bulgaria's Burgas airport July 18, 2012.

The bombing in Bulgaria on Wednesday was committed by a suicide bomber and not by a charge planted in the bus beforehand as believed at first, a senior official in the Israeli Foreign Ministry told Haaretz on Thursday.

Eight people were killed in the bombing, six of them Israeli tourists, one of them the Bulgarian bus driver, with authorities estimating that the eighth may be the terrorist who perpetrated the attack. An additional 32 Israelis were wounded in the attack.

The Bulgarian police said that footage from airport security cameras captured the suspect roaming the airport for at least one hour, the Bulgarian news agency Novinite reported. According to the report he was a long-haired Caucasian in sportswear.

The body suspected as belonging to the terrorist had a U.S. passport issued in Michigan – apparently fake.

During the night, two Israeli aircrafts carrying medical staff, a casualty identification team, a police forensic team, as well as, Israeli diplomats to assist in the return of Israelis who lost their identification in the attack.

Gideon Meir, deputy director of the Israeli foreign ministry, said that the governments of Bulgaria and Israel are closely cooperating to deal with the aftermath of the attack. Israel is involved in both the treatment of the wounded and in the investigation of the attack.

According to Meir, Bulgaria had agreed to send a plane from Burgas to Israel to aid in the return of Israelis stranded there.

During the night, all 32 of the Israeli wounded were checked by Israeli medical staff. Israeli embassy workers in Bulgaria contacted all Israelis that were on the flight and fell victim to the attack.

A large number of passengers are still in the airport, refusing to go to the hotel fearing an additional attack. They were provided water and blankets by the Israeli embassy.

Overnight, a team of 8 Israeli forensic experts was dispatched to Bulgaria, given the task of identifying the victims, and preparing the bodies for their return to Israel. At the head of the team is Uri Argaman, the head of the police’s forensic identification unit.

The delegation will arrive along with half a ton of police equipment, with police officials intending to set up a mobile lab, where all of the testing will take place.

No reconciliation with the butcher of Damascus

July 19, 2012

No reconciliation with the butcher of… JPost – Opinion – Op-Eds.

 

07/18/2012 23:07
Do they really think in their heart of hearts that a political solution is possible with Assad?

Syrian President Bashar Assad

Photo: Sana / Reuters

I must express my profound outrage regarding the behavior of the Western powers, Turkey, the Arab League and Kofi Annan, all of whom are still debating the likelihood of finding a political solution to end the merciless butchering of the Syrian people by the Assad regime.

Do they really think in their heart of hearts that a political solution is possible given the fact that Assad has defied all previous resolutions while his killing machine continues to erase one Syrian town after another? How ironic it is that the countries that preach the gospel of human rights have resorted to self-imposed paralysis while justifying it by the presumed lack of legitimacy of intervention.

WHAT LEGITIMACY is needed to intervene when thousands of men, women and children are massacred each month? When does hypocrisy end when politics trump moral obligation, and when great powers surrender their most precious values to the devil? I understand the pitfalls and the potentially regional repercussions resulting even from a carefully-planned military intervention. But this must be weighed not only against the systematic butchering of the Syrian people but also against the credibility and the standing of these powers in the eyes of those nations that look up to United States or NATO not to tolerate this kind of travesty, which transcends the cruelest human conduct imagined.

What do other despots learn from the Syrian experience and why should they behave any differently toward their own people when they can do so with immunity? For how much longer can those countries that can actually do something to stop the carnage wait? When is enough, enough? How many more Syrians must be killed in cold blood for the consciousness of the international community to be awakened to action? The most recent massacre, estimated to be between 120 and 200 people in the village of Tremseh near the city of Hama, attests not only to Assad’s utter ruthlessness but also to his fear that he is about to lose his grip on power.

Although Assad has moved some of his chemical weapons either to protect them from falling into the hands of the rebels or as a last-ditch effort to use them against the rebels to save his regime, it will be suicidal as he will be crossing a red line that invites immediate Western military intervention.

At the time of this writing, the United Nations Security Council will be at it again trying to pass yet another useless and insulting resolution designed to end the conflict peacefully. One would think that by now the United States and NATO members have learned their lessons from previous resolutions that have only allowed Assad to continue the unabated slaughter of his people.

THE FIRST draft resolution, sponsored by Russia, calls for extending the UN observer mission by an additional three months and supports a more political mission by cutting back the number of military observers. In addition, Russia urges both sides to observe a cease-fire, calls for the full implementation of the Annan Plan, and forcefully rejects a Chapter VII mandate which allows for the use of economic and diplomatic sanctions in any and all forms up to, but not including, military force.

This resolution is no different from the Annan plan that was dead on arrival and ignored from day one, forcing the UN observers to suspend their mission in the wake of the continuing killings and indiscriminate destruction.

The three Western powers (the US, Britain and France) drafted a more forceful resolution that would give Assad 10 days to comply with the full implementation of the Annan plan by first withdrawing troops from populated areas. Should he fail to do so, Syria would face diplomatic and economic punishment in addition to the threat of military force under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. Any effort to agree on a compromise between the two resolutions, if successful at all, will end once up again being a toothless resolution that will only give Assad license to continue his massacres without any fear of punishment or serious threats to his regime.

The Western powers might still offer their resolution for a vote through the UNSC even though they expect Russia to exercise its veto power. The advantage they would reap from such an exercise is to paint Russia as a complicit party to the abhorrent developments in Syria, which are sliding the state quickly toward full-fledged civil war, which the Red Cross has already characterized the bloodshed as. Although Russia’s position would be greatly undermined in the eyes of Arab states, the mass killing would continue.

The outcry of the Syrian people has been heard time and time again but the international community remains paralyzed, engaged in wishful thinking that somehow the Assad regime will heed their call. This obviously will not happen and now Western powers, along with Turkey, must muster the courage and decide on a course of action that will bring an end to a regime that has long since lost any remaining vestiges of humanity. Assad and his cronies must go. Under no circumstances can there be any reconciliation between the butcher of Damascus and the international community or Syria’s people.

The time has come for a coordinated military intervention, with or without Russian consent. A safe haven must be established in the north and south of the country, spearheaded by Turkey with the support of NATO. A no-fly zone should go into effect immediately, medical, financial and military aid should be provided to the opposition forces, and selected Syrian military targets should be bombed.

Simultaneously, a clear message should be sent to Assad that the bombing will escalate until he steps down from power. The West, along with the Arab League, should offer him and the hundreds of culprits from his military, police and intelligence services safe passage to a third country provided he makes the decision to leave within two weeks and on the condition that he immediately stops the onslaught against his people. In so doing the US, unlike Russia, could increase its leverage with the Syrians once Assad is deposed.

THE CONCERN that such a military intervention may plunge the Middle East into regional conflict is baseless.

The last thing that Assad would venture to do is challenge Turkey and its NATO allies. Moreover, to draw Israel into the conflict would invite counterattacks that could obliterate his power base.

Iran, which is under tremendous international pressure because of its defiance of the international community in connection with its nuclear program, will think twice before it directly interferes, fearing that this may provide the United States or Israel the pretext to attack its nuclear installations. Hezbollah will seek to preserve its position and is unlikely to come to Assad’s aid, knowing full well that the Assad regime has run its course.

FINALLY, RUSSIA can do nothing to prevent Western and Turkish interference with the support of the Arab League other than condemning their actions.

Moreover, Russia knows that for all intents and purposes the Assad regime is finished. It is not unlikely that if Russia also knows of the inevitable Western military intervention, it may decide to make a deal with the West and Turkey with the blessing of the Arab League and the Syrian opposition (as was recently discussed between the opposition and Russia) to ensure its strategic interests in the region and sacrifice the Assad regime in return.

As I have stated time and again, such a course of action will provide the West a momentous opportunity to extract Syria from Iran’s belly, which might force Iran to rethink its regional strategy as well as its nuclear ambition.

Time is running out. The longer Western powers wait, the more Syrians will die on the altar of international ineptitude.

There are no excuses left for the West to hide behind its contrived political calculations and lose what is left of its moral standing.

The writer is a professor of international relations at the Center for Global Affairs at NYU. He teaches courses on international negotiation and Middle Eastern studies. alon@alonben-meir.com