Archive for January 10, 2012

‘Monitors only ‘buying time’ for Assad’s crackdown’

January 10, 2012

‘Monitors only ‘buying time’ for Assad’s c… JPost – Middle East.

Arab League monitors in Syria inspect  damages

   

Arab League monitors are only giving Syrian authorities more time to crack down on opponents, opposition figures said Monday after the League opted to keep the mission in place despite Syria’s failure to comply fully with an Arab peace plan.

After a meeting in Cairo to review progress, the Arab League said the government had only partly implemented a pledge to stop the repression, free detainees and withdraw troops from cities. It said it would add more monitors to the 165-strong team, ignoring calls to pull the plug on what critics say is a futile effort that provides a fig leaf for Assad to suppress opponents.

“I never expected anything good from the Arab League, so it’s not a real disappointment,” a US-based Syrian journalist told The Jerusalem Post. “Anyone watching the League’s actions over the past 10 months knows it’s not interested in helping Syria, but only in appearing to be carrying out its responsibilities.

“All Arab countries are dictatorships – who are we kidding?” he said.

“Why would they want a neighboring dictatorship to be toppled? It would spread like wildfire… These dictators are threatened by the Arab Spring. They don’t want this to reach their countries.”

Rima Fleihan, a member of the Syrian National Council, a leading opposition group in exile, said the initial Arab League report “is too vague, and it essentially buys the regime more time.”

“We need to know what the League will do if the regime continues its crackdown in the presence of the monitors. At one point it needs to refer Syria to the UN Security Council,” she said.

The observers, whose mission began two weeks ago, have failed to stop a crackdown on protests against President Bashar Assad in which the UN says more than 5,000 people have been killed in 10 months.

The Arab League appears reluctant to defer the matter to the UN Security Council, which in the case of Libya led to foreign military intervention that helped rebels topple Muammar Gaddafi.

Russia and China have opposed any Security Council move on Syria, while Western powers hostile to Assad have so far shown little appetite for Libya-style intervention in a country that sits in a far more combustible area of the Middle East.

“The costs and risks are too high,” Aram Nerguizian, a visiting fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told the Post. “The risks of unintended consequences to neighboring states like Israel, Jordan and Lebanon are critical – the parallel with Libya just doesn’t stand.”

Nonetheless, Syrian opposition factions are increasingly calling for foreign intervention. On Monday details emerged that a deal between the two main opposition factions had collapsed, apparently signaling that voices calling for intervention to topple Assad have gained the upper hand over those rejecting it.

Ten days ago Burhan Ghalioun, head of the mostly exiled Syrian National Council (SNC), signed an accord with the mainly Syrian-based National Coordination Body (NCB) outlining a transition to a democratic post-Assad Syria.

The agreement rejected “any military intervention that harms the sovereignty or stability of the country,” while leaving the door open for an Arab role to stop Assad’s crackdown.

But members of Ghalioun’s own council denounced the deal, forcing him to disavow it. Many grassroots protesters inside Syria also rejected it, saying they had lost hope that 10 months of peaceful demonstrations – now accompanied by an armed insurgency in some regions – would bring down Assad.

“The paper has been canceled after pressure from members of the council. Some threatened to resign,” SNC member Khaled Kamal said.

“Ghalioun signed it without the knowledge of council members, so after consultation he withdrew his signature.”

Kamal said many SNC members had originally shared the NCB’s rejection of an intervention such as a no-fly zone or buffer zone to protect civilians. “But now all roads are blocked and the political solution did not work,” he said.

“After 10 months and after we knocked on all doors… foreign intervention is the only choice before us,” he said, adding that the SNC would begin a campaign to get recognition as the only opposition group representing the mass demonstrations.

Opposition leaders meeting in Istanbul on Monday reinstalled Ghalioun as head of the SNC.

Sinai missile threat leads to change in Eilat flight routes

January 10, 2012

Sinai missile threat leads to change in Eilat … JPost – Defense.

airplane, smoke [illustrative]

    Due to fears of a growing shoulder-to-air missile threat from Sinai, passenger planes landing in Eilat have changed their final approach, cutting short the time they spend along the border with Egypt, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

Eilat has one airport with one runway. Planes coming from the north land there by flying past Eilat until they are over the Red Sea. The planes then make a U-turn, fly back north and land.

Concern among the defense establishment is that the planes could be targeted by man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) while passing over the sea, since they fly alongside several mountains that are in Egypt.

In August, a missile was fired at two Israel Air Force Cobra attack helicopters as part of a multi-stage attack from the Sinai Peninsula that killed eight Israelis. The helicopters detected the launching and immediately diverted from their flight path. They were not hit.

The IDF is disturbed by the growing presence of MANPADs in Sinai and the Gaza Strip. Israeli intelligence also believes that stockpiles of Libyan MANPADs have been smuggled into Sinai and possibly into Gaza.

Since the attack in August, the IAF has instituted new safety regulations for flights along the border. Such regulations have already been in place for almost two years for flights over the Gaza Strip.

Due to the growing threat, the government might consider moving up plans to construct a new Eilat airport. In July, the government approved a plan to build a new facility north of Eilat, near Timna Park. According to the plan, the Airports Authority will finance construction and operate the airport.

The cost of the project is estimated at approximately NIS 1.6 billion, with construction expected to take three years. An estimated 1.5 million passengers are forecas

Ahmadinejad, Chavez mock US, joke about bomb

January 10, 2012

Ahmadinejad, Chavez mock US, jok… JPost – Iranian Threat – News.

Venezuela's Chavez welcomes Iran's Ahmadinejad

    CARACAS – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez lavished each other with praise on Monday, mocked US disapproval and joked about having an atomic bomb at their disposal.

“Despite those arrogant people who do not wish us to be together, we will unite forever,” the Iranian president told socialist leader Chavez at the start of a visit to four left-leaning Latin American nations.
Khamenei: Iran won’t yield to Western sanctions

Despite their geographical distance, the fiery anti-US ideologues have forged increasingly close ties between their fellow OPEC nations in recent years, although concrete projects have often lagged behind the rhetoric.

Ahmadinejad was in Venezuela at the start of a tour intended to shore up support as expanded Western economic sanctions kick in over the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program.

“The imperialist madness has been unleashed in a way that has not been seen for a long time,” Chavez said in a ceremony to welcome Ahmadinejad at his presidential palace in Caracas.

Both men hugged, beamed, held hands and showered each other with praise.

As he often does, the theatrical and provocative Chavez stuck his finger right into the global political sore spot, joking that a bomb was ready under a grassy knoll in front of his Miraflores palace steps.

“That hill will open up and a big atomic bomb will come out,” he said, the two men laughing together.

“The imperialist spokesmen say … Ahmadinejad and I are going into the Miraflores basement now to set our sights on Washington and launch cannons and missiles … It’s laughable.”

US officials from President Barack Obama down have expressed disquiet over Venezuela’s close ties with Iran. They fear Chavez will weaken the international diplomatic front against Iran and could give Tehran an economic lifeline.

The United States and its allies believe Iran’s nuclear policy is aimed at producing a weapon. Iran says it is only for peaceful power generation.

As well as Venezuela, Ahmadinejad plans to visit Nicaragua, Cuba and Ecuador — a visit that Washington has said shows its “desperation” for friends.

Brazil notably absent from Ahmadinejad’s agenda

Those nations’ governments share Chavez’s broad global views, but do not have Venezuela’s economic clout and are unable to offer Iran any significant assistance.

Regional economic powerhouse Brazil, which gave the Iranian leader a warm welcome when he visited during the previous government of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, was notably absent from his agenda this time.

Analysts are watching closely to see if Chavez will back Iran’s threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most important oil shipping lane, or how much he could undermine the sanctions by providing fuel or cash to Tehran.

Ahmadinejad, who is subordinate to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on foreign policy, has said little about the rising tensions with the West, including the sentencing to death of an Iranian-American man for spying for the CIA.

The Venezuelan and Iranian leaders mostly limited their comments on Monday to mutual adulation and anti-US snipes.

“President Chavez is the champion in the war on imperialism,” Ahmadinejad said.

“The only bombs we’re preparing are bombs against poverty, hunger and misery,” added Chavez, saying 14,000 new homes had been built recently in Venezuela by Iranian constructors.