An ironic lesson for Iran — the reality behind the rhetoric | Ottawa Citizen.
The lesson couldn’t be more obvious.
Even as the destroyerUSS Kidd, wasrescuing 13 Iranian fishermen from the Al Molai who’d been held for weeks by Somali pirates, Iran announced plans for yet another round of war games as it ratcheted up tensions in the Persian Gulf.
Real Admiral Ali Fadavi, naval commander of the Revolutionary Guards Corps, said Friday military exercises next month would focus directly on the Strait of Hormuz, which leads out of the Gulf and provides the outlet for most oil from the Middle East. On Monday, Iran concluded a similar 10-day drill in neighbouring seas. “Today theIslamic Republic of Iran has full domination over the region and controls all movements within it,” Fadavi said.
Oh really? Then why didn’t the Iranian navy rescue the fishermen if it control so much the area. After all, the pirates and their hostages had been bobbing around the North Arabian sea, near the Strait of Hormuz, for more than a month.
U.S. Navy rescues Iranian fishermen
Fadavi’s rhetoric echoes that of Iranian army chief General Ataollah Salehi, who earlier this week warned the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis and its strike group “not to return to the Persian Gulf” after having transited the waterway in late December. Add this to Fadavi’s braggadocio and you have to wonder whether the Iranians fully realize the dangerous game they are playing.
But then I don’t imagine either the naval commander or the army chief appreciate the irony of having Iranian fishermen freed by the very carrier group that Iran insists shouldn’t return to the Gulf.
What strikes me about the Iranian rhetoric is how similar it sounds to that used by former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. As some may remember, Hussein bragged constantly about possessing weapons of mass destruction, and regularly warned how he’d rain down hell on American troops – and Israel, too — should the Americans invade.
We all know what happened to Saddam. Everybody believed him, including his own military commanders who were stunned to find there were no WMD available when the U.S. did invade in 2003. It had all been a big bluff on Saddam’s part.
If the Iranians do attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz that would be a casus belli for war, as I argued in a previous blog (see below).
No doubt, the Iranian navy could do considerable damage in a war situation, particularly if they got in a few surprise attacks. There are numerous U.S. targets within range of Iranian missiles. As well, the Iranian navy has many small boats that could attack ships near the shore. And then, of course, the mullahs would probably order their allies – Hamas and Hezbollah – to strike at Israel. (That, of course, would provoke an Israeli response, so things would really get nasty.)
The reality, however, is that U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet, which is based in the area, is far more powerful than Iran’s naval forces. The carrier USS Stennis is accompanied by a guided-missile cruiser and flotillas of destroyers – including the USS Kidd — and submarines.
The Combined Maritime Force protecting Gulf shipping also includes other countries such Britain, France, Canada, Australia and the Gulf Arab states, under the command of a U.S. admiral.
There are also several U.S. air bases in the region.
American officials have said the U.S. will ensure the international waters of the strait stay open, and, unless the Obama administration goes all wobbly, there is little doubt about the outcome of any conflict.
For the Iranians, the lesson should be obvious: When you talk loudly, have big sticks to back up your rhetoric.
Perhaps Fadavi and Salehi should have a chat with the captain of the Al Molai. He might have some intelligence about the capabilities of the U.S. Navy.
(Come to think of it, I wonder what the captain’s fate will be for allowing himself to be rescued by infidels.)






Recent Comments