Posted tagged ‘YPG’

Erdoğan to US: Choose either Turkey or the PYD as your partner

February 7, 2016

Erdoğan to US: Choose either Turkey or the PYD as your partner

February 07, 2016, Sunday/ 10:51:35/

Source: Erdoğan to US: Choose either Turkey or the PYD as your partner

Erdoğan to US: Choose either Turkey or the PYD as your partner

President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. (Photo: Reuters)

In one of his strongest remarks to date, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has lambasted the US after a senior official’s visit last week to the northern Syrian town of Kobani, which is under the control of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD), and called on Washington to choose either Turkey or “terrorists in Kobani” as a partner.

Erdoğan directed severe criticism at the visit to the town by Brett McGurk, US President Barack Obama’s special envoy for the anti-Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) coalition. The visit came at a time where Geneva peace talks were taking place, and the Turkish president declared that the US should make a choice between the PYD and Turkey.

Erdoğan has called on the US and the European Union to list the major Syrian Kurdish political party and its armed wing as terrorist organizations over their affiliation with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which is fighting against the Turkish state and which is regarded as a terrorist group by Washington and Brussels.

“Do you accept the PKK as a terrorist organization? Then why don’t you list the PYD and [People’s Protection Units] YPG as terrorist organizations, too?” Erdoğan asked while speaking to reporters on Friday on board a plane en route to Turkey from a week-long Latin America tour

This is not the first time Erdoğan has made such a call. His and other senior Turkish leaders’ calls reflect a split between Ankara and its allies over how to treat the Syrian Kurdish party and its armed faction.

The Kurdish militia the YPG has been a reliable ally in the fight against ISIL on the ground and has benefited from the US arms supply on several occasions.

While the US and EU share Turkey’s view toward the PKK and sees it as a terrorist organization, they differ in their views regarding the PYD and YPG.

During his visit, McGurk met with senior PYD and YPG officials and pledged further support for Syrian Kurds. He also visited a cemetery and paid his respects to YPG fighters killed during a months-long battle with ISIL in Kobani.

It was the first time a top US official has visited the YPG-controlled town, reflecting the type of relationship the US and the PYD enjoy. The US airdropped weapons and munitions during the siege of Kobani.

“We discovered advanced Russian, US and European weapons in PKK cells during military operations in southeastern Turkey. Where do these weapons come from?” the Turkish president asked, revealing Turkey’s growing anxiety that some of the weapons provided by the US and EU to the YPG end up in PKK hands.

“The PKK is a terrorist organization and the YPG is too. The PYD is what the PKK is. [US Vice President] Joe Biden came with an official. A national security official [Obama’s envoy]. He visits Kobani at the time of the Geneva talks and is awarded a plaque by a so-called YPG general. How can we trust [you]?” Erdoğan said, expressing his dismay over McGurk’s visit.

McGurk was given a plaque by YPG official Polat Can, a former PKK member. It sparked a harsh reaction from Ankara as Erdoğan called on the US to choose, saying, “Am I your ally or are the ‘terrorists’ in Kobani?”

Erdoğan also repeated his criticism of Russian air strikes in Syria. The Turkish president said on Friday that Russia must be held accountable for the people it has killed in Syria, arguing that Moscow and Damascus were together responsible for 400,000 deaths there.

While speaking at a joint press conference with his Senegalese counterpart during a brief stopover in the West African country on Friday, Erdoğan also dismissed a Russian statement that Turkey was preparing for an incursion in Syria, saying he is “laughing” at the claim.

Ankara has dismissed this as propaganda intended to conceal Russia’s own “crimes.”

Erdoğan said Russia was engaged in an invasion of Syria and accused it of trying to set up a “boutique state” for its longtime ally President Bashar al-Assad.

“Russia must be held accountable for the people it has killed within Syria’s borders,” the Doğan news agency quoted him as saying. “By cooperating with the regime, the number of people they have killed has reached 400,000.”

His comments are likely to further anger Moscow. Relations between Turkey, a NATO member, and Russia hit their worst low in recent memory last November after Turkey shot down a Russian warplane Ankara said had violated Turkish airspace from Syria.

Report: Turkey suspects Russia building air base near border with Syria

January 22, 2016

Report: Turkey suspects Russia building air base near border with Syria

January 22, 2016, Friday/ 14:41:44/ TODAY’S ZAMAN

Source: Report: Turkey suspects Russia building air base near border with Syria

 Report: Turkey suspects Russia building air base near border with Syria

Turkish troops and military vehicles are seen on the Turkish-Syrian border near the Syrian town of Qamishli in this May 2015 file photo. (Photo: DHA)

Turkish authorities reportedly have intelligence suggesting that Russia might be preparing to establish an air base close to Turkey’s border with Syria, a step likely to deepen tensions that flared between the two countries after Turkish warplanes downed a Russian fighter jet in November last year, according to a report.

A Russian delegation led by a lieutenant general flew to the northern Syrian town of Qamishli, right across the border from Nusaybin in southeastern Turkey, on Jan. 16, a news report published in the Hürriyet daily said, quoting unnamed security sources.

Qamishli is being controlled by the Democratic Union Party (PYD), a Syrian Kurdish group that is linked to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) terrorist group. Ankara opposes PYD efforts to expand its influence in northern Syria, saying it is a terrorist organization that is no different from the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).

The Russian delegation conducted extensive inspections in and around the airport in Qamishli, according to the sources. The delegation, which included officials from Russian military intelligence, was accompanied by representatives from the PYD.

Turkish sources suspect that the delegation’s visit is a part of Russian plans to renovate the airport in the town so that it can be turned into a base for warplanes and military cargo planes. This would also entail the installation of radars that would be able to closely monitor Turkish military activities in the area.

After reports that Russia deployed troops to YPG-controlled Qamishli, the Turkish military reinforced the Syrian border with additional tanks and armored vehicles and has started to dig trenches on the border as a security measure.

The Turkish armed forces are now digging trenches on the Turkish side of the border opposite an airport in Qamishli. A large minefield lies between Nusaybin, a Turkish border town in the southeastern province of Mardin, and Qamishli in Syria.

The deployment of Russian troops and military experts to conduct examinations in Kurdish-controlled Qamishli has brought tension between the two countries to a dangerous new level, increasing the prospect of an inadvertent encounter in the area.

These events come after media reports yesterday of an agreement between the US and the YPG for the US to use an airfield in the YPG-controlled part of Hasakah province in northeastern Syria. US military experts are now working to expand the airfield so as to deploy American aerial vehicles, including UAVS, for strikes against ISIL.

The recent developments reveal the complicated nature of geopolitics and the rapidly shifting alignments in Syria’s combustible battlefield, with countless numbers of actors seeking to carve out zones of influence for themselves. Syrian Kurds, who have adopted a non-aligned stance in the Syrian civil war, have cultivated close ties with both the US and Russia to further their own interests, which involve establishing a separate political zone for the Kurdish people.

Speaking in a parliamentary session on Thursday, Deputy Prime Minister Tuğrul Türkeş confirmed Russia’s deployment of a small contingent force in Qamishli. But he played down the nature of the development, saying that a small-scale Russian military presence near the Turkish border is not a significant threat to NATO-member Turkey.

Russia’s foray into Syria’s prolonged war created a new conundrum both for Turkey and the US-led international coalition against the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).

When a Russian bomber jet violated Turkish airspace after two previous incursions, it prompted Turkish air forces to shoot it down. Subsequently a major dispute broke out between the two nations, triggering a series of sanctions imposed by Moscow on Turkish trade goods.

Following the jet crisis Russia deployed cutting-edge S-400 air defense systems to Syria. This was a move meant to keep Turkish air forces out of Syrian airspace, and one which practically ruled out any Turkish contribution to Western coalition air strikes against ISIL targets in Syria. To avoid another incident, the US urged Turkey to suspend all its flights over Syria.

On Thursday, the US-led coalition carried out new air strikes against ISIL targets in Syria. On the same day, according to Turkish military sources, Russian jets pounded Turkmen positions in western Syria and rural Aleppo, in an intensifying campaign to uproot Western-backed moderate Syrian rebel groups, including Turkmen forces, to the dismay and fury of Turkey and the West.

Russia’s selective targeting of moderate groups has complicated the fight against ISIL, leading to renewed accusations from the West and Turkey, who say Moscow intends to destroy non-ISIL opposition groups rather than fighting the extremist ISIL militants.

Moscow denies charges of watering down its fight against ISIL.

Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova accused Turkey of sending militants to Syria to join terrorist groups such as the “al-Nusra Front.” She went on to claim that the recent Turkish efforts to build a wall are not intended to boost border security, but rather serve as shelter for terrorists and position from which terrorists can cross the border.

Turkey and Russia frequently engage in tit-for-tat accusations and recriminations over each other’s stance in the Syrian conflict, exacerbating the state of discord among them.

 

Column One: Obama strikes again

July 31, 2015

Column One: Obama strikes again, Jerusalem Post, Caroline Glick, July 30, 2015

ShowImage (5)US President Barack Obama (L) and Vice President Joe Biden. (photo credit:OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE PHOTO BY PETE SOUZA)

Most of the antiquities that ISIS plunders in Iraq and Syria make their way to the world market through Turkey. So, too, most of the oil that ISIS produces in Syria and Iraq is smuggled out through Turkey. According to the US Treasury, ISIS has made $1 million-$4m. a day from oil revenue.

Instead of maintaining its current practice of balancing its support for Turkey with its support for the Kurds, under the agreement, the West ditches its support for the Kurds and transfers its support to Turkey exclusively.

************************

While Israel and much of oficial Washington remain focused on the deal President Barack Obama just cut with the ayatollahs that gives them $150 billion and a guaranteed nuclear arsenal within a decade, Obama has already moved on – to Syria.

Obama’s first hope was to reach a deal with his Iranian friends that would leave the Assad regime in place. But the Iranians blew him off.

They know they don’t need a deal with Obama to secure their interests. Obama will continue to help them to maintain their power base in Syria though Hezbollah and the remains of the Assad regime without a deal.

Iran’s cold shoulder didn’t stop Obama. He moved on to his Sunni friend Turkish President Recep Erdogan.

Like the Iranians, since the war broke out, Erdogan has played a central role in transforming what started out as a local uprising into a regional conflict between Sunni and Shiite jihadists.

With Obama’s full support, by late 2012 Erdogan had built an opposition dominated by his totalitarian allies in the Muslim Brotherhood.

By mid-2013, Erdogan’s Muslim Brotherhood- led coalition was eclipsed by al-Qaida spinoffs. They also enjoyed Turkish support.

And when last summer ISIS supplanted al-Qaida as the dominant Sunni jihadist force in Syria, it did so with Erdogan’s full backing. For the past 18 months, Turkey has been ISIS’s logistical, political and economic base.

According to Brett McGurk, the State Department’s point man on ISIS, about 25,000 foreign fighters have joined ISIS in Syria and Iraq. All of them transited through Turkey.

Most of the antiquities that ISIS plunders in Iraq and Syria make their way to the world market through Turkey. So, too, most of the oil that ISIS produces in Syria and Iraq is smuggled out through Turkey. According to the US Treasury, ISIS has made $1 million-$4m. a day from oil revenue.

In May, US commandos in Syria assassinated Abu Sayyaf, ISIS’s chief money manager, and arrested his wife and seized numerous computers and flash drives from his home. According to a report in The Guardian published last week, the drives provided hard evidence of official Turkish economic collusion with ISIS.

Due to Turkish support, ISIS has become a self-financing terrorist group. With its revenue stream it is able to maintain a welfare state regime, attracting recruits from abroad and securing the loyalty of local Sunni militias and former Ba’athist forces.

Some Western officials believed that after finding hard evidence of Turkish regime support for ISIS, NATO would finally change its relationship with Turkey. To a degree they were correct.

Last week, Obama cut a deal with Erdogan that changes the West’s relationship with Erdogan.

Instead of maintaining its current practice of balancing its support for Turkey with its support for the Kurds, under the agreement, the West ditches its support for the Kurds and transfers its support to Turkey exclusively.

The Kurdish peshmerga militias operating today in Iraq and Syria are the only military outfits making sustained progress in the war against ISIS. Since last October, the Kurds in Syria have liberated ISIS-controlled and -threatened areas along the Turkish border.

The YPG, the peshmerga militia in Syria, won its first major victory in January, when after a protracted, bloody battle, with US air support, it freed the Kurdish border town of Kobani from ISIS’s assault.

In June, the YPG scored a strategic victory against ISIS by taking control of Tal Abyad. Tal Abyad controls the road connecting ISIS’s capital of Raqqa with Turkey. By capturing Tal Abyad, the Kurds cut Raqqa’s supply lines.

Last month, Time magazine reported that the Turks reacted with hysteria to Tal Abyad’s capture.

Not only did the operation endanger Raqqa, it gave the Kurds territorial contiguity in Syria.

The YPG’s victories enhanced the Kurds’ standing among Western nations. Indeed, some British and American officials were quoted openly discussing the possibility of removing the PKK, the YPG’s Iraqi counterpart, from their official lists of terrorist organizations.

The YPG’s victories similarly enhanced the Kurds’ standing inside Turkey itself. In the June elections to the Turkish parliament, the Kurdish HDP party won 12 percent of the vote nationally, and so blocked Erdogan’s AKP party from winning a parliamentary majority.

Without that majority Erdogan’s plan of reforming the constitution to transform Turkey into a presidential republic and secure his dictatorship for the long run has been jeopardized.

As far as Erdogan was concerned, by the middle of July the Kurdish threat to his power had reached unacceptable levels.

Then two weeks ago the deck was miraculously reshuffled.

On July 20, young Kurdish activists convened in Suduc, a Kurdish town on the Turkish side of the border, 6 kilometers from Kobani. A suicide bomber walked up to them, and detonated, massacring 32 people.

Turkish officials claim that the bomber was a Turkish Kurd, and a member of ISIS. But the Kurds didn’t buy that line. Last week, HDP lawmakers accused the regime of complicity with the bomber. And two days after the attack, militants from the PKK killed two Turkish policemen in a neighboring village, claiming that they collaborated with ISIS.

At that point, Erdogan sprang into action.

After refusing for months to work with NATO forces in their anti-ISIS operations, Erdogan announced he was entering the fray. He would begin targeting “terrorists” and allow the US air force to use two Turkish air bases for its anti-ISIS operations. In exchange, the US agreed to set up a “safe zone” in Syria along the Turkish border.

Turkish officials were quick to explain that in targeting “terrorists,” the Turks would not distinguish between Kurdish terrorists and ISIS terrorists just because the former are fighting ISIS. Both, they insisted, are legitimate targets.

Erdogan closed his deal in a telephone call with Obama. And he immediately went into action.

Turkish forces began bombing terrorist targets and rounding up terrorist suspects. Although a few of the Turkish bombing runs have been directly against ISIS, the vast majority have targeted Kurdish forces in Iraq and Syria.

Moreover, for every suspected ISIS terrorist arrested by Turkish security forces, at least eight Kurds have been taken into custody.

Then, too, Erdogan has called on AKP lawmakers to begin criminalizing their counterparts from the HDP. Kurdish lawmakers, he urged them, must be stripped of their parliamentary immunity to enable their arrests.

As Erdogan apparently sees things, by going to war against the Kurds, he will be able to reestablish the AKP’s parliamentary majority. Within a few weeks, if the AKP fails to form a governing coalition – and it will – then new elections will be held. The nationalists, who abandoned the AKP in June, will return to the party to reward Erdogan for fighting the Kurds.

As for that “safe area” in northern Syria, as the Kurds see it, Erdogan will use it to destroy Kurdish autonomy. He will flood the zone with Syrian Arab refugees who fled to Turkey, to dilute the Kurdish majority. And he will secure coalition support for the Sunni Arab militias – including those still affiliated with al-Qaida – which will be permitted by NATO to operate openly in the safe area.

Already the Kurds are reporting that the US has stopped providing air support for their forces fighting ISIS in the border town of Jarablus. Those forces were bombed this week by Turkish F-16s.

For their part, despite Erdogan’s pledge to fight ISIS, his forces seem remarkable uninterested in rolling back ISIS achievements. The Turks have no plan for removing ISIS from its strongholds in Raqqa or Haskiyah.

The Obama administration is presenting the deal with Turkey as yet another great achievement.

In an interview with Charlie Rose on Tuesday, McGurk explained that the deal was a long time in the making. It began with a phone conversation between Obama and Erdogan last October and it ended with their phone call last week.

In October, Obama convinced Erdogan not to oppose US air support for the Kurds in Kobani and to enable the US to resupply YPG fighters in Kobani through Turkey. In the second, Obama agreed not to oppose Erdogan’s offensive against the Kurds.

Two years ago, in August 2013, the world held its breath awaiting US action in Syria. That month, after prolonged equivocation amidst mountains of evidence, the Obama administration was forced to acknowledge that Iran’s Syrian puppet Bashar Assad had crossed Obama’s self-declared redline and used chemical weapons against regime opponents, including civilians.

US forces assembled for battle. Everything looked ready to go, until just hours before US jets were scheduled to begin bombing regime targets, Obama canceled the operation. In so doing, he lost all deterrent power against Iran. He also lost all strategic credibility among America’s regional allies.

To save face, Obama agreed to a Russian proposal to have international monitors remove Syria’s chemical weapons from the country.

Last summer, the administration proudly announced that the mission had been completed.

UN chemical weapons monitors had removed Syria’s chemical weapons arsenal from the country, they proclaimed. It didn’t matter to either Obama or Secretary of State John Kerry that by that point Assad had resumed chemical assaults with chlorine-based bombs. Chlorine bombs weren’t chemical weapons, the Americans idiotically proclaimed.

Then last week, the lie fell apart. The Wall Street Journal reported that according to US intelligence agencies, Assad not surrendered his chemical arsenal.

Rather, he hid much of his chemical weaponry from the UN inspectors. He had even managed to retain the capacity to make chemical weapons – like chlorine-based bombs – after agreeing to part with his chemical arsenal.

Assad was able to cheat, because just as the administration’s nuclear deal with the Iranians gives Iran control over which nuclear sites will be open to UN inspectors, and which will be off limits, so the chemical deal gave Assad control over what the inspectors would and would not be allowed to see. So, they saw only what he showed them.

Obama has gone full circle in concluding his deal with Erdogan. Since entering office, Obama has sought to cut deals with both the Sunni jihadists of the Muslim Brotherhood ilk and the Shi’ite jihadists of the Iranian ilk.

His chemical deal with Assad and his nuclear deal with the ayatollahs accomplished the latter goal, and did so at the expense of America’s Sunni Arab allies and Israel.

His deal last week with Erdogan accomplishes the former goal, to the benefit of ISIS, and on the backs of America’s Kurdish allies.

So that takes care of the Middle East. With 17 months left to go till Obama leave office, the time has apparently come for the British to begin to worry.