Posted tagged ‘Saudi’

Saudi Funded Mosque Opens in Nice Before Attack

July 15, 2016

Saudi Funded Mosque Opened in Nice Two Weeks Before Attack

by Liam Deacon

15 Jul 2016

Source: Saudi Funded Mosque Opens in Nice Before Attack

An Islamic Mosque, funded and owned by a hardline, “fundamentalist” Saudi Arabian cleric, opened in the Nice just two weeks before the Southern French city was struck by a deadly terror attack.

Town Mayor Christian Estrosi had fought a bitter legal battle with the French state in an attempt to stop it opening, claiming the owner, Saudi Minister of Islamic Affairs Sheikh Saleh bin Abdul Aziz Al-Sheikh (pictured left) “advocates Sharia law and destroyed all the churches on the Arabian Peninsula.”

“Our intelligence agencies are worried about this place of worship,” the mayor said, before warned about “unregulated foreign funding,” according to French news site RTL.

Mr. Estrosi, mayor since 2008, argued that the project, which was initiated under his predecessor in 2002, was unauthorised. He took central government representative Prefect Adolphe Colrat to court but did not succeed.

Mr. Colrat accused Mr. Estrosi, who is a member of France’s centre-right The Republicans Party, of “feeding populism” and scapegoating the entire Muslim community to gain votes, AFP reported.

f746730783506e3f43cc156a547207c05a406bab

The Mosque, in an office district of Nice – AFP

The mosque opened at the beginning of this month, and was described as “a real joy” by Ouassini Mebarek, a lawyer and head of a local religious association.

“But there is no smug triumphalism,” he told AFP. “This is recognition of the law, and a right to freely practise one’s religion in France in accordance with the values of French Republic”.

Cleric Saleh bin Abdul-Aziz Al ash-Sheikh is perceived to be a strict adherent of Wahhabism – the dominant strain of Islam in Saudi Arabi and the state religion – which has been described, variously, as “ultraconservative”, “austere”, “fundamentalist” and even “extremist”.

The revivalist movement is closely related to the Salafism practices by Islamic State (IS) terrorists, with the two terms – Salafi and Wahhabi – often considered synonymous and interchangeable.

Last night, at least 84 people died in the city, including children, after a lorry slammed through a crowd celebrating Bastille Day, France’s national day.

Identification papers found in the truck point to a 31-year-old Nice resident that held duel French and Tunisian citizenship. French President François Hollande declared it an “undeniable” terrorist attack.

Suicide bomber strikes near Prophet’s Mosque in holy Saudi city of Medina (VIDEO)

July 4, 2016

Suicide bomber strikes near Prophet’s Mosque in holy Saudi city of Medina (VIDEO)

Published time: 4 Jul, 2016 17:11 Edited time: 4 Jul, 2016 17:27

Source: Suicide bomber strikes near Prophet’s Mosque in holy Saudi city of Medina (VIDEO) — RT News

A general view of the Prophet Mohammed Mosque in the Saudi holy city of Medina. © Mahmud Hams / AFP

A bomb exploded outside the Prophet’s Mosque in the Saudi city of Medina on Monday night, local state television reported.

Multiple videos flooding social media showed charred corpses lying next to the burning husk of a car in the mosque’s car park, as police and ambulance sirens blared, and hundreds of onlookers filmed footage on their smartphones.

Monday is the last night of the holy month of Ramadan, and marks the beginning of Eid, the biggest festival in the Muslim calendar.

Other explosions took place Monday in the port city of Jeddah, and Qatif, an eastern city populated by the predominantly-Sunni country’s embattled Shia minority.

UN’s Ban Ki-moon admits threats resulted in Saudi-led coalition being removed from blacklist

June 10, 2016

UN’s Ban Ki-moon admits threats resulted in Saudi-led coalition being removed from blacklist

Published time: 9 Jun, 2016 16:23 Edited time: 9 Jun, 2016 21:19

Source: UN’s Ban Ki-moon admits threats resulted in Saudi-led coalition being removed from blacklist — RT News

 

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has admitted that his decision to remove the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen from the organization’s blacklist came after threats from a number of countries. Human rights groups are urging him to backtrack on the decision.

Ban said on Thursday that temporarily removing the coalition from the blacklist was “one of the most painful and difficult decisions I have had to make,” and that it raised “the very real prospect that millions of other children would suffer grievously.”

“Children already at risk in Palestine, South Sudan, Syria, Yemen and so many other places would fall further into despair,” he told reporters.

The UN secretary-general added that “it is unacceptable for member states to exert undue pressure…scrutiny is a natural and necessary part of the work of the United Nations.”

Read more

FILE PHOTO © Anees Mahyoub

Ban did not specifically mention the Saudi-led coalition in his remarks.

It comes after a diplomatic source told Reuters on condition of anonymity that the UN was faced with “bullying, threats [and] pressure” from Riyadh, adding that it was “real blackmail.”

The source also said there was a threat of “clerics in Riyadh meeting to issue a fatwa against the UN, declaring it anti-Muslim, which would mean no contacts of OIC [Organisation of Islamic Cooperation] members, no relations, contributions, support, to any UN projects [or] programs.”

A fatwa is a legal opinion used in sharia law. In Saudi Arabia, they can only be issued by the group of top, government-appointed clerics and are sometimes commissioned by the ruling family to back up its political positions.

In addition, several diplomatic sources said the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) would be hit especially hard if the blacklisting were upheld. Saudi Arabia was the fourth-biggest donor to the UNRWA last year, supplying it with nearly US$100 million.

However, the Saudi Arabian government denied on Thursday that it had threatened the UN, Al Arabiya reported.

Saudi Arabia’s UN envoy, Abdallah Al-Mouallimi, also stated that “we don’t use threats or intimidation,” and Riyadh is “very committed to the United Nations.” He also denied any threat of a fatwa, calling the notion “ridiculous” and “outrageous.” 

The UN’s removal of the coalition from the blacklist came on Monday, despite releasing a report the same day which said its campaign had caused 60 percent of child deaths and injuries in Yemen last year, killing 510 and wounding 667. It also blamed the coalition for half the attacks on schools and hospitals.

Speaking to RT, human rights activist Lama Fakih, a senior crisis adviser at Amnesty International, also stressed that the coalition had been responsible for child deaths in Yemen.

“We have seen for example attacks against schools rendering them unusable so that children have not been able to start the academic year. We’ve seen the Saudis also use banned cluster munitions which act as landmines when they are left in civilian areas and are particularly problematic for children, who mistake them for toys and move them around and end up being causalities of these weapons,” she said.

But following the report’s release, Mouallimi called the UN’s figures “wildly exaggerated” and asked for the report to be “corrected immediately so it does not reflect the accusations that have been made against the coalition and Saudi Arabia in particular.”

Read more

Shi'ite Houthi rebels drive a patrol truck in Rada, Yemen. © Mohamed al-Sayaghi

“If there are any casualties from the coalition side, they would be far, far lower,” he added.

Meanwhile, rights groups including Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and Oxfam wrote a letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Wednesday, criticizing his decision to remove the coalition from the blacklist.

“If the Saudi-led Coalition wants to be removed from the list, it should stop killing and maiming children and bombing schools and hospitals in Yemen – the violations for which it was listed,” the groups wrote, as quoted by Reuters.

They went on to state that the removal undermines “an invaluable tool in efforts to curb violations against children in armed conflict.”

“The list creates pressure on parties to armed conflict to comply with international law. Over 20 governments and armed groups have signed UN action plans and taken steps to end violations against children in order to be considered for ‘de-listing,'” the groups continued.

The rights groups involved in the Wednesday letter said the move amounted to Ban capitulating to Saudi Arabia and tainting his legacy before stepping down at the end of the year.

Catherine Shakdam of the Shafaqna Institute of Middle Eastern Studies slammed the way the UN has acted with regards to Saudi Arabia as a double standard, adding that Saudis just don’t see the United Nations as an authority.

The UN is supposed to represent a political ideal and ensure countries abide by the rules of the international law. So far the Saudis have not played by the rules. Yemen is just holding a mirror to Saudi Arabia and to the kind of violations the Saudis feel they’re entitled to commit because no one will hold them accountable,” she told RT.
It’s not so much as the Saudi problem, we have a greater problem where the UN is completely [failing] the purpose of its creation which was to create a system in the society where people and countries would feel they have a higher authority.

Tensions in Yemen escalated after Shiite President Saleh was deposed in 2012 and his Houthi supporters, reportedly aided by Iran, eventually seized the capital city Sanaa in 2014. Houthi forces then advanced from Sanaa towards the south, seizing large parts of Yemen, and sending the current Sunni President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi into exile.

In March 2015, the Saudi-led coalition responded with airstrikes in order to stop Houthi advances and reinstate Hadi back into power. By late summer of that year, the Saudi-led forces had launched a ground operation.

Over 6,500 people were killed in the conflict, including 3,218 civilians, from March 2015 to March 2016, according to the UN.

White House Signals Veto of Senate Bill Allowing 9/11 Families to Sue Saudi Arabia

May 18, 2016

White House Signals Veto of Senate Bill Allowing 9/11 Families to Sue Saudi Arabia

by Charlie Spiering

17 May 2016

Source: White House Signals Veto of Senate Bill Allowing 9/11 Families to Sue Saudi Arabia – Breitbart

The White House is standing by their assertion that the president would likely veto the Senate-passed bill that would allow 9/11 families to sue the Saudi government — even though the Senate voted unanimously in favor of the bill.

“Given the concerns that we have expressed, it’s difficult to imagine the president signing this legislation,” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said. “That continues to be true.”

Earnest said the administration would continue to ”strongly oppose” the bill, citing “unintended consequences” of making the United States more vulnerable in international court systems.

He signaled sympathy for the 9/11 families, insisting that “Our heart breaks for those people.” Earnest added:

These are thousands of Americans who walk around everyday with a hole in their heart because they lost a loved one on that tragic day. And trying to make sense of that and trying to move with your — with one’s life is something that many of them have been challenged to do and they’ve demonstrated tremendous patriotism and heroism as they’ve moved on with their lives.

Although Sen. Chuck Schumer remained hopeful that Congress could successfully override the White House veto, Earnest remained skeptical that the the bill could be passed in the House.

“There are Democrats and Republicans in the House of Representatives that have raised concerns about the bill in the same way that the administration has,” he said. “So we’ll engage in a conversation with the House of Representatives and we’ll take it from there.”

Senate Passes Bipartisan Bill Allowing 9/11 Victims to Sue Saudi Arabia, Despite Veto Threats

May 18, 2016

Senate Passes Bipartisan Bill Allowing 9/11 Victims to Sue Saudi Arabia, Despite Veto Threats

by Adelle Nazarian

17 May 2016

Source: Senate Passes Bipartisan Bill Allowing 9/11 Victims to Sue Saudi Arabia, Despite Veto Threats – Breitbart

Sean Adair/Reuters

On Tuesday, the Republican-controlled Senate unanimously approved bi-partisan legislation that would allow for families of the victims of the devastating 9/11 terrorist attacks to sue the government of Saudi Arabia.

The move stands in stark defiance to veto threats and opposition from President Barack Obama’s White House, which is concerned about America’s relationship with the Sunni-dominated Kingdom.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) co-sponsored the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act and are calling upon the House of Representatives to follow suit.

“This bill is very near and dear to my heart as a New Yorker because it would allow the victims of 9/11 to pursue some small measure of justice,” Schumer said, according to the Hill.

It now rests upon the House of Representatives to pass the bill before it makes its journey to the president’s desk, where it will seek final approval.

Despite bipartisan ownership of and support for the bill, the Obama administration has threatened a veto. Also on Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest echoed the administration, warning of “unintended consequences” and saying, “It’s difficult to imagine the president signing this legislation.”

At a recent press conference, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) also voiced skepticism about the legislation, saying, “I think we need to review it to make sure we are not making mistakes with our allies and we’re not catching people in this that shouldn’t be caught up in this.”

Fox News notes that Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), who serves as the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, also warned that the legislation, if passed, would alienate the kingdom and undermine America’a relationship with their longstanding ally in the Middle East.

In spite of the reservations and veto threats from President Obama, Schumer said he believes the power of the Senate will be greater than the president’s. “I think we easily get the two-thirds override if the president should veto,” Schumer reportedly said.

Calls have been made by relatives of the 9/11 victims for the Obama administration to declassify and release U.S. intelligence reports that could include discussion of Saudi involvement in the attacks.

Last month, Breitbart News reported that Saudi Arabian and other Gulf press lashed out at President Obama prior to his visit to Riyadh over the potential passage of the bill, a accusing a “schizophrenic” Congress of being in cahoots with Iran in holding the kingdom responsible for involvement in the attacks.

Similar to sound bites coming out of the White House, they said the move will likely cause irreversible damage to U.S.-Saudi ties.

Iran’s role in the 9/11 attacks has been the subject of great debates over the past 15 years. The 9/11 Commission Report stated that some of the hijackers went through Iran but did not have their passports stamped there, suggesting the regime may have had knowledge about the attacks. Additionally, the report suggests that Hezbollah, which is a terrorist organization sponsored by Iran, had provided “advice and training” to al-Qaeda members.

Although none of the 19 hijackers who carried out the 9/11 attack were Iranian, this past March U.S. District Judge George Daniels in New York ordered Iran to pay over $10 billion in damages to families of victims who died that day. According to Russian television, that same judge had cleared Saudi Arabia earlier of culpability in the attack. Fifteen of the hijackers were Saudi Arabian citizens, two were from the United Arab Emirates, and one each were from Egypt and Lebanon.

 

Saudis braced for release of hidden pages of 9/11 report

May 12, 2016

Saudis braced for release of hidden pages of 9/11 report

May 11, 2016

Source: Saudis braced for release of hidden pages of 9/11 report

Washington (AFP) – Saudi Arabia is confident nothing in a secret 28-page section of a US congressional report on the September 11 attacks implicates its leaders.

But some officials worry its eventual publication — 15 years after the assault on New York and Washington — will stir suspicion at a time of tense ties.

In December 2002, a year after the attacks, the House and Senate committees on intelligence published a report into the US investigation into them.

But the then president, George W. Bush, ordered that 28 pages of the report be classified to protect the methods and identities of US intelligence sources.

Last month, former senator Bob Graham said the pages should be made public and alleged Saudi officials had provided assistance to the 9/11 hijackers.

Graham, who was the Senate intelligence committee chairman, said the White House had told him they will decide by June whether to declassify the pages.

The issue of alleged — and fiercely denied — Saudi involvement in the attacks has been brought up again by attempts to lodge a law suit against the kingdom.

Relatives of some of the American victims of the hijackers are lobbying Congress to pass a law lifting Saudi Arabia’s sovereign immunity from liability.

– Mystery pages –

But Riyadh insists it has nothing to fear from the mysterious 28 pages and that US investigators have thoroughly debunked all the allegations they contain.

“Our position, since 2002 when the report first came out, was ‘release the pages’,” Saudi foreign minister Adel al-Jubeir told reporters in Geneva last week.

“We know from other senior US officials that the charges made in the 28 pages do not stand up to scrutiny. And so yes, release the 28 pages.”

For most in Washington, the congressional report was superseded in July 2004 by the final report of the separate 9/11 Commission set up by Bush.

This found no evidence of official Saudi complicity — but the ongoing secrecy surrounding Congress’ earlier 28 pages has continued to stir suspicion.

“We can’t rebut charges if we’re being charged by ghosts in the form of 28 pages,” Jubeir said.

“But every four or five years this issue comes up and it’s like a sword over our head. Release it.”

Jubeir added that, thanks to multiple leaks in the years since the congressional report was locked away in a safe on Capitol Hill, he can guess what it says.

“Nothing stays a secret,” he said. “So we know that it’s a lot of innuendo and insinuations.”

So what exactly are the secret allegations?

The 28 pages are thought to include a claim that Princess Haifa, the wife of then Saudi ambassador Prince Bandar, sent money to the hijackers.

Princess Haifa sent thousands of dollars to Osama Basnan, a Saudi living in San Diego who befriended 9/11 hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar.

Investigators were told the money was to pay to treat Basnan’s wife for thyroid cancer. The 9/11 Commission found no evidence it was passed to the hijackers.

Another likely allegation in the missing pages concerns Omar al-Bayoumi, a Saudi civil aviation official who had been studying in California.

Bayoumi was arrested in England 10 days after the September 11 attacks and questioned by British and US authorities before being released without charge.

It is thought the missing pages cite allegations that he met Hazmi and Mihdhar at a Los Angeles restaurant.

– Clandestine ties? –

Later he helped the pair settle in San Diego, leading to suspicions that he was acting on behalf of Saudi paymasters to help prepare the Al-Qaeda attack.

But the 9/11 Commission report said FBI investigators found Bayoumi to be “an unlikely candidate for clandestine involvement with Islamist extremists.”

Whatever allegations are in the missing pages of the congressional report, Saudi Arabia’s defenders will point to the later 9/11 Commission report.

“Saudi Arabia has long been considered the primary source of Al-Qaeda funding,” it said.

“But we have found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization.”

But if Riyadh is so confident in its defense, why then the nervousness about the release?

Reports allege the kingdom threatened to withdraw $750 billion in investments from the United States if Congress strips it of its immunity in US courts.

This claim triggered outrage — the tabloid New York Daily News reported it under the headline “Royal Scum” — but Jubeir denies it amounted to a threat.

“Nonsense,” he declared, arguing Riyadh had simply warned the legislation being considered by Congress would overturn the idea of sovereign immunity.

“It’s a simple principle and it protects everybody, including the United States,” he said.

“We said a law like this is going to cause investor confidence to shrink, not just for Saudi Arabia but for everybody,” he added.

“But this idea that ‘Oh my God, now the Saudis are threatening us’? We don’t threaten things.”

Saudi has a nuke ! ? ! ?

February 20, 2016

Saudi Political Analyst Dahham Al-‘Anzi: KSA Has Obtained Nuclear Bomb. Test May Be Held Soon

Published on Feb 16, 2016

Saudi political analyst Dahham Al-‘Anzi spoke on Russia Today Arabic TV channel on February 15 and claimed that Saudi Arabia has obtained a nuclear bomb. Al-‘Anzi said that the Saudis have acquired the bomb two years ago and that a nuclear test is expected soon. “The superpowers know about this,” he added.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXuJkVPRjNI