Posted tagged ‘Palestinians’

Day 40: Egypt warns there will be no more truce proposals

August 16, 2014

Day 40: Egypt warns there will be no more truce proposalsHamas threatens Israel with war of attrition if demands not met, says many more issues to be resolved in Cairo negotiations; Palestinian delegation says progress made but chances for ceasefire deal no higher than 50%By Yifa Yaakov and Ricky Ben-David August 16, 2014, 12:13 am Updated: August 16, 2014, 3:03 pm

via Day 40: Egypt warns there will be no more truce proposals | The Times of Israel.

 

Palestinian boys with Hamas supporters hold toy guns and shout slogans
during a demonstration in the West Bank city of Nablus
on Friday, Aug. 15, 2014. (photo credit: AP Photo/Nasser Ishtayeh)

 

$1,000 of Qatari money to be paid to Gazans who lost homes

The Hamas social affairs ministry tells Palestinians in Gaza that in two day’s time, it will pay — using donations from Qatar — $1,000 to each person whose home was destroyed during Operation Protective Edge, Ynet reports.

‘Hamas has not agreed to the Egyptian proposal’

A senior Hamas official says the terror group has not agreed and will not agree to what the Palestinian delegation has been offered before leaving Cairo, Ynet reports

“The stance of the [Palestinian] delegation is clear. We will not accept what has been offered to us before we leave. We object to any formula [of a proposal] that does not go hand in hand with the demands of the Palestinian people. There are several issues [in the 11-point Egyptian proposal] that are unacceptable to the delegation,’ says Issat a-Rishq, a close associate of Hamas political chief Khaled Mashaal.

No more ceasefire proposals, says Egypt

Egypt says it will not submit any more ceasefire proposals to either side, after Cairo offered an 11-point proposal yesterday, Israel Radio reports.

Hamas has said the bid did not meet the needs of the Palestinian people.

14:45

Head of Palestinian delegation has ‘high hopes’ for truce deal

Azzam al-Ahmad, who heads the Palestinian delegation at the Cairo talks, tells AFP he is quietly optimistic that an agreement for a longer-term truce could be reached.

“We have high hopes of reaching an agreement very soon, before the end of the truce, and perhaps even, very quickly, for a permanent ceasefire,” he says.

But Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri struck a hardline, insisting that there can be no return to peace without a lifting of Israel’s blockade, which it imposed together with Egypt in large part to prevent Hamas from importng weapons, after it violently seized control in 2007.

“We can reach an agreement if the Israeli side accepts all the demands of the unified Palestinian delegation, in particular the end of any aggression against our people, the war on Gaza and the complete lifting of the siege,” Abu Zuhri said.

Israel has spoken little in public about the negotiations.

The five-day truce is set to end Monday night.

‘Moderate’ Palestinian Authority Claims U.S. Created ISIS To Divide Muslims

August 16, 2014

Moderate’ Palestinian Authority Claims U.S. Created ISIS To Divide Muslims

The US, whose most advanced pawns include Israel and its new creation, ISIS, whose goal is to destroy the Arab world and eliminate the Palestinian cause.”

8.15.2014Israel RevoltJeff Dunetz

via ‘Moderate’ Palestinian Authority Claims U.S. Created ISIS To Divide Muslims | Truth Revolt.

 

 

he supposedly “moderate” Palestinian Authority led by President Abbas is rewarding the billions of dollars provided by this country by inciting its citizens to hate the United States, claiming America has established the radical Islamic movement Islamic State (ISIS or IS) with the long-term goal of controlling the Arab-Muslim states by dividing them through conflict and wars.​

On August 7th, the official Palestinian Authority TV Station, the “Palestine News Network,” reported Fatah Central Committee Member Abbas Zaki made the claim:

Fatah Central Committee Member and Commissioner of Arab Relations and Relations with China Abbas Zaki said the Palestinian language and terminology [employed] with the Zionist enemy must be changed, as whoever has seen the extent of the destruction, the ruins and the limbs torn from the pure bodies of our people in Gaza understands the goals of the Zionist attack (i.e., Operation Protective Edge) – [namely,] to exploit the terrible situation in the Arab world that has resulted from the lack of bravery, enthusiasm and willpower among those [countries] who have made subjugation to the US their way [of life]… [The US,] whose most advanced pawns include Israel and its new creation, ISIS, whose goal is to destroy the Arab world and eliminate the Palestinian cause.

Additionally five times in the past six week the official Palestinian Authority Newspaper “Al-Hayat Al-Jadida” published an op-ed slandering America with the same claim. Below are three examples:

A July 10th Op-ed by Adli Sadeq, PLO Ambassador to India and regular columnist for Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, said, in part:

It is Israel that, whenever it gets bored, returns to Gaza with military aircraft to destroy homes and facilities and kill children. Where is the help, you [Hezbollah] sectarian liars who collaborate with the Persian Ayatollahs… hostile [ones], and your ilk – the CIA’s collaborators from the ISIS -who destroy revolutions and give nations a bad name?

Palestinian Youth Union General Director Muharram Barghouti wrote on July 16th:

The ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq), Islamic Front, and Al-Nusra Front (i.e., all radical Islamists) are Muslims from various countries the US is using to fight in Iraq and Syria, in order to fragment the unity of these two Arab countries…

We are now more aware that the Americans – who want to fight for their own interests using Islamic, Jewish and Christian believers – are truly the head of the snake… ISIS’s declaration that it will fight Israel only after it has finished with the infidels merely proves that ISIS in Syria and Iraq will not fight the Jewish ISIS, because the plot is the same plot, the boss is the same boss, and the goal is the same goal: to tear [apart] the Arab homeland and gain control of its resources – through the blood of others.”

Palestinian Author Ibrahim Abd Al-Majid​’s op-ed on August 3rd:

This [ignorance] has peaked in [recent] years, with the radical terrorists of ISIS and those like them, who were created by Israel and the US, and are paving the way for Israel to act like them.”

These as well as the remaining examples were originally posted at Palwatch

Hamas to Israel: Accept our terms or brace for war of attrition

August 16, 2014

Hamas to Israel: Accept our terms or brace for war of attrition

While Cairo ceasefire talks expected to resume tomorrow, Hamas official says that if demands of Palestinian delegation are not met, Israel should prepare itself for a prolonged war.

YnetnewsPublished: 08.16.14, 10:34 / Israel News

via Hamas to Israel: Accept our terms or brace for war of attrition – Israel News, Ynetnews.

 

Senior Hamas and Islamic Jihad members say that the proposals that Palestinians received during the negotiations in Cairo, including those detailed in the latest Egyptian draft, do not meet their demands, Israel Radio reported. Hamas’ foreign affairs spokesman Osama Hamdan said during a visit to Sudan that Israel has a choice: accept the terms of the Palestinian people or prepare for a prolonged war of attrition.

According to the report, a senior Islamic Jihad operative in Gaza said that the Palestinian delegation will not sign a degrading agreement and would prefer to return to the Strip without any agreement. However, he added that his organization would give Egypt enough time to conduct successful negotiations on a permanent ceasefire.

 

Palestinian delegation to Cairo talks
 

Speaking ahead of the renewal of the talks in Cairo on Sunday, Khaled al-Batesh, member of the Palestinian envoy in Cairo and leader of the Islamic Jihad Movement stressed that “the Palestinian factions have put forward reasonable and limited aims for the current campaign, and didn’t ask for the release of the city of Ramla.” Al-Batesh also criticized the Egyptian efforts, saying the country “could have done more for the Palestinians.”

Meanwhile, Bassam Salhi, a Palestinian delegation member, said that progress is being made in the talks but that the chances of reaching an agreement in the upcoming round of talks are no greater than 50% due to differences of opinion on several issues, the report added. According to Salhi, the Palestinians are prepared to postpone the discussion of operating a seaport and airport in Gaza, but only by several weeks.

Two-pronged formula

On Friday, a report from an Egyptian news source published additional details of the current ceasefire draft from talks in Cairo, saying that the document stipulates that organizations in Gaza will concede to cease the construction of new smuggling tunnels in and out of the Strip.

Palestinian officials expressed optimism regarding the proposal currently on the table, meant to reach a long-term ceasefire in Gaza, as Israel’s Cabinet convened, presumably to discuss the looming deal.

Palestinian source close to the talks spoke with Ynet and said the current ceasefire deal was based on two simple formulas which together formed the agreement: (1) A ceasefire deal in return for Gaza’s rehabilitation, and (2) redevelopment of Gaza in return for demilitarization of the Strip.

The two pronged deal will be gradually implemented, the sources said.

Economy Minister Naftali Bennett seemed to hint a deal existed, but said that Israel should make unilateral concessions to Palestinians in Gaza without actually reaching an agreement with Hamas, which he claimed would empower the terror group.

Speaking at the end of Cabinet meeting Friday morning, Bennett said Israel should open Gaza’s border crossings and expand the Strip’s fishing zone unilaterally, without reaching a deal with Hamas, which he said “harms our right to target (terror) tunnels.”

Palestinian officials: War behind us, Gaza ceasefire deal imminent

August 15, 2014

Palestinian officials: War behind us, Gaza ceasefire deal imminent

Deal reportedly reached to see calm in Gaza extended based on two-pronged formula: Ceasefire in return for rehabilitation of Gaza and redevelopment in return for demilitarization; meanwhile, Israeli Cabinet convenes, Islamic Jihad says: War has ended.

Elior Levy, Roi Kais

Published: 08.15.14, 14:50 / Israel News

via Palestinian officials: War behind us, Gaza ceasefire deal imminent – Israel News, Ynetnews.

 

A Ceasefire , a redevelopment, a demilitarization ,  BUT NO PEACE TREATY , who can believe this ?

It is just impossible for them to sign peace with Jews and unbelievers, it is a religious thing ! The Islaam !

A ceasefire can be broken any time as proven in the past, a peace treaty NOT , according islamic laws .

Just to fool Israel and the rest of the world, they have a word for it .

Taqiyya and Kitman

 

Palestinian officials expressed optimism Friday regarding current diplomatic attempts to reach a long-term ceasefire in Gaza, as Israel’s Cabinet convened, presumably to discuss the looming deal.

Palestinian source close to the talks spoke with Ynet and said the current ceasefire deal was based on two simple formulas which together formed the agreement: (1) A ceasefire deal in return for Gaza’s rehabilitation, and (2) redevelopment of Gaza in return for demilitarization of the Strip.

The two pronged deal will be gradually implemented, the sources said.

 

Palestinian delegation to Cairo talks (Photo: AFP)
 

Economy Minister Naftali Bennett seemed to hint a deal existed, but said that Israel should make unilateral concessions to Palestinians in Gaza without actually reaching an agreement with Hamas, which he claimed would empower the terror group.

Speaking at the end of Cabinet meeting Friday morning, Bennett said Israel should open Gaza’s border crossings and expand the Strip’s fishing zone unilaterally, without reaching a deal with Hamas, which he said “harms our right to target (terror) tunnels.”

Speaking to Israel Radio, Environmental Protection Minister Amir Peretz said Friday before the meeting that that Israel “in the midst of the final stages of negotiations.”

The Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s second-in-command, Ziad Nahala, said Friday that the “war was over.”

 

Ziad Nahala (Photo: Reuters)

Speaking to Al Hayat, Nahala said that “at this point we have no choice but to reach a truce. That stands at the head of our priorities. I believe that we are approaching an agreement.”

“The great destruction caused by the war obligates us,” he said, adding that though the majority of the Palestinian delegation’s demands were not met, “Our achievements are acceptable.”

Photo: AP

Two-pronged deal: From ceasefire to demilitarization

The ‘ceasefire for rehabilitation’ and ‘redevelopment for demilitarization’ formula will be gradually implemented, and each will be conditioned on the other.

In the first stage, a deal will be signed promising a calm period during which time Gaza will go massive rehabilitation efforts, and stipulates a number of international projects for rebuilding the Strip.

In the second stage, in return for a demilitarization of Gaza, larger infrastructure development projects will begin, also under international oversight.

Nonetheless, it is far from certain a Palestinian commitment to a demilitarization of Gaza will include a complete disarming of all of the terror factions in Gaza.

Moreover, the relative level demilitarization will influence the level of redevelopment, and therefore, as Hamas will retain some of its arms and military capabilities, there will not be a sea or air port in Gaza; however, movement from sea and land will be permitted under international oversight.

Israel’s goal in such a deal is to block potential rearming by terror factions, first and foremost by Hamas and the Islamic Jihad.

Egypt for its part wants to create a situation in which Hamas cannot create its own arms and rockets through materials smuggled Rafah tunnels, diverting these materials to international forces working on reconstructing the Strip. Thus Egypt, with the support of Israel, is de facto tightening its hold over Hamas.

Palestinians claim that the current five day lull is not a sign of progress, but only a sign that the sides believe that a deal can be reached given more time. They further claim that the discussion regarding sea and air ports – one of the Palestinians central demands – have been postponed to next month.

A Palestinian involved in talks told Asharq Al Awast that the chances of reaching a deal were more than 50 percent, but noted that “a number of issue remains.” According to him the chances of reaching a deal were contingent on “Israel’s desire to reach a long term accord.”

Speaking to the paper, Palestinian Prime Minister Rami Hamadallah reuitered that the Palestinian delegation is unified, after initial talks exposed anger at Hamas by more moderate Palestinian factions.

“These are not Hamas’s conditions, Hamadallah said, “they are Palestinian demands. There is a unified delegation in Cairo which represents all political factions, even of those in the diaspora.

“The demands are the lifting of the blockade and the opening of the crossings, among others. And these are not the requirements of a particular faction but the Palestinian people and leadership.”

PA: Benefits to Palestinian Businesses that Boycott Israel

August 15, 2014

PA: Benefits to Palestinian Businesses that Boycott Israel

Israel supplies the Palestinian Authority with electricity, and this is nothing new.

But this electricity has recently become a weapon against Israel.

The PA decided to boycott Israeli goods sold in the West Bank and granted numerous benefits to businessmen, including discounts on electric bills, in order to encourage them to stop selling blue and white.

Aug 15, 2014, 02:45PM | James McIntosh

via Israel News – PA: Benefits to Palestinian Businesses that Boycott Israel – JerusalemOnline.

 

Poster Channel 2 News

First publication: the trend of boycotting Israeli products has really made its way to us, over the fence. The Palestinian Authority has called on Palestinian businessmen to boycott all goods made in Israel in exchange for economic incentives.

“Shops free of Israeli goods will be eligible for a full exemption from the business license fee for a year, as well as a 10% discount on their electric bill for six months,” said an official letter from the PA Ministry of Local Government to West Bank businessmen. It must be noted that Israel provides the PA with the electricity serving as an incentive for the shop-owners.

In another poster making the rounds on social media and the Palestinian street, the logos of Israeli companies can be seen adorning missiles with an Israeli Star of David. The poster includes a call to buy only Palestinian products.

“Objective: promote the boycott among the entire Palestinian people”

The PA used to have a law prohibiting the purchase of goods made in the settlements. Former PA prime minister Salam Fayyad was filmed burning goods produced beyond the Green Line. But this time it seems that they really have taken a step up.

Exports from Israel to the PA are valued at approximately NIS 5 billion. Food exports are estimated to be more than a fifth of this sum, which would be a difficult blow to Israeli food companies.

In the meanwhile, the Palestinian street has seen considerable cooperation with the boycott by citizens, and even private initiatives to label Israeli goods have emerged. “Our objective is to promote the principles of the boycott among the entire Palestinian people, which could economically influence the occupation’s products and factories,” said Ammar al-Zatari, one of the leaders of the boycott.

It seems that the battle over the land has become the battle over the wallet, and when the PA boycott merges with the world boycott, it seems that it will be very difficult for Israel to win this war as well.

Islamic Jihad official: There will be a cease-fire, even without an agreement

August 15, 2014

Islamic Jihad official: There will be a cease-fire, even without an agreement

By JPOST.COM STAFFLAST UPDATED: 08/15/2014 12:35

Ziad al-Nakhaleh says Palestinians have put aside Gaza airport and seaport discussions;

Israeli delegation to return to Cairo Saturday night; Amir Peretz: We’re in the most important phase now.

via Islamic Jihad official: There will be a cease-fire, even without an agreement | JPost | Israel News.

 

Prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu at weekly cabinet meeting
Photo: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM
 

he Palestinian delegation indicated Friday that a lasting cease-fire could be imminent.

“From our point of view, we’re heading toward a cease-fire, even if there isn’t an agreement,” Islamic Jihad’s Ziad al-Nakhaleh said. In media reports, he confirmed that Palestinian groups have agreed to delay negotiations over the airport and seaport, signifying what could be a step towards both sides coming to a compromise.

Senior Hamas official Izzat a-Rishak said that the next steps in the negotiation process are still up in the air, in terms of a decision in Cairo. “Talks are ongoing between Hamas officials in Qatar, in the Gaza Strip and in the West Bank,” he said.

Israel’s security cabinet convened in Tel Aviv on Friday morning to discuss the cease-fire agreement and negotiations taking place between Israel and the Palestinians in Cairo.

The meeting is the second of its kind in 24 hours, as the cabinet also discussed matters on Thursday night.

The Israeli delegation is currently not in Cairo and is set to return on Saturday night.

Also on Friday morning, Environmental Protection Minister Amir Peretz said on Israel Radio that the country is “in the midst of the final stages of the negotiations, the most important stages.”

He also said that the results of Operation Protective Edge remain to be seen and will only be visible once the negotiations conclude.

On Thursday, the prime minster convened the eight-member security cabinet to brief it on the talks in Egypt and what seems to be an emerging agreement that will be based on the accord reached after 2012’s Operation Pillar of Defense, which called for an end to the rocket fire, the opening of border crossings under Egyptian and Israeli supervisions, and the funneling of money into Gaza through Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, to ensure that it does not go into Hamas’s coffers.

Khaled Abu Toameh and Yasser Okbi contributed to this report.

Netanyahu Updates Cabinet on Obama’s Weapon Ban and Hamas Negotiations

August 15, 2014

By: Shalom Bear

Published: August 15th, 2014

via The Jewish Press » » Netanyahu Updates Cabinet on Obama’s Weapon Ban and Hamas Negotiations.

 

Netanyahu meets with southern Israel mayors on August 14, 2014.
Photo Credit: Haim Zach/GPo/FLASH90
 

The Israeli Cabinet met again for a second time in 24 hours to discuss ongoing negotiations with Hamas in Cairo. Talks are set to resume again on Sunday in the hopes of reaching and signing a long-term ceasefire agreement with the terror organization.

It is believed that basis for the negotiations now appears to be the 2012 accord reached after Operation Pillar of Defense, which among other things called for an end to rocket fire on Israel (never happened), the opening of border crossings under Egyptian and Israeli supervision (did happen), and the transfer of money to Gaza through PA President Mahmoud Abbas (which is more of an internal Palestinian Authority problem).

But much of the negotiations remain shrouded in secrecy and rumor, as some reports say that Israel agreed to a Gaza sea port in exchange for Hamas’s demilitarization – terms which Hamas turned down, and other reports saying that Israel made no such offer.

What is clear is that the demilitarization of Gaza and Hamas no longer even appears to be seriously under discussion.

Other reports say that Israel agreed to the transfer of money to Hamas clerks, as long as there is oversight that it doesn’t go to Hamas terrorists, presuming one can tell the difference between the Hamas agent who fires a rocket, and the Hamas clerk who pays for the rocket to be built in the first place.

Netanyahu also updated the cabinet on the latest tensions between US President Obama against the Jewish State, specifically Obama’s new ban (or delay) on weapon sales to Israel – including those related to Iron Dome.

Netanyahu’s strategy seems to be to push the problems down the road – wait until Obama is no longer president, and then fight the next fight with Hamas then too.

Terror finance trial plaintiffs: Arab Bank records show funds were transferred to Hamas

August 15, 2014

Terror finance trial plaintiffs: Arab Bank records show funds were transferred to Hamas

By YONAH JEREMY BOB, FRANK G. RUNYEON 08/15/2014 01:57

One of the lead plaintiffs’ lawyers said evidence would show that the bank required “all employees to donate 5 percent of their salaries” to the second intifada.

via Terror finance trial plaintiffs: Arab Bank records show funds were transferred to Hamas | JPost | Israel News.

 

Peace flags are reflected on the Arab Bank window during anti-wardemonstration in Rome. Photo: REUTERS
 

Plaintiffs told the jury in the Arab Bank terror financing trial on Thursday that “you will see bank records in black and white that say ‘Hamas’” as proof the bank knew it was being used to fund terrorism.

One of the lead plaintiffs’ lawyers, Mark Werbner said that evidence would show that the bank required “all their employees to donate 5 percent of their salaries” to the second intifada.

The plaintiffs allege that Arab Bank, Jordan’s sovereign bank with branches in 30 countries, facilitated massive transfer of funds to Hamas leaders and institutions, as well as to the families of imprisoned Hamas members and suicide bombers, via Saudi Arabia and Hezbollah’s al-Shahid Foundation.

It is alleged that Arab Bank knew the transfered funds were not solely related to terrorists and terrorist groups, but used in attacks – a charge that the Jordanian institution denies.

Werbner added that the funds that passed through the bank “is the oxygen that feeds these kinds of organizations.”

Tab Turner, another plaintiff’s lawyer, said that the evidence would show “millions, literally millions” of dollars “flowed right down the middle of Madison Avenue.”

Turner also said that the applicable US anti-terrorism financing law on the issue says, “thou shalt not provide financial services to foreign terrorist organizations.”

He accused the bank of serving “as the paymaster” for an alleged terror-funding Saudi Arabia-related committee.

Aside from the accusations, the plaintiffs displayed photographs, bank records, bank letters and internal memoranda to prove their case while opening with a description of a March 28, 2001, terrorist attack connected to the case, and allegedly to the bank.

Werbner said that the bank had not made a mistake but that “it was a choice.”

He added that the bank assisted with terror financing because it was “the ideology of the bank,” which made public statements characterizing Israel as the enemy.

The plaintiffs outlined payments from the bank to 24 suicide bombers’ families, 145 operatives families and 11 living operatives, 92.5% of which were paid in cash.

They mentioned advertisements in newspapers asking for martyrs’ families to come to the bank to collect payment.

Shand Stephens, representing the bank, said, “our hearts go out to the victims,” but that “we’re not here with Hamas as a defendant,” distinguishing the bank as having no knowledge that funds were being wired through it to terrorists.

He added that the plaintiffs unfairly argued that “every neighbor knew every neighbor” and that the bank, which conducts millions of transactions a year, genuinely did not know that terrorists were the recipients of the funds.

Stephens, in trying to humanize the bank, noted that the brother of bank chairman Sabih al-Masri was killed in a terrorist attack – without making a direct link to the case.

Rather than the emotional underpinnings of the case, the defense lawyers highlighted that the technical workings of the bank’s compliance systems checked watch-lists for electronic fund transfers.

The case has massive diplomatic implications.

A critical issue, which brought the US State Department, Justice Department and Treasury Department to loggerheads over what official US policy should be, is an April 2013 sanctions order imposed by a New York federal court which significantly penalized the bank for refusing to disclose key documents that the plaintiffs said they need to prove their case.

The bank had refused to turn over certain documents, saying it could incur criminal sanctions from Jordan and Lebanon for violating bank secrecy laws, but a lower US court rejected this rationale.

Arab Bank maintained its claim that the transfers were made with no knowledge of wrongdoing at the time – despite the terrorism-connected persons the transfers were made to, including Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, arch-terrorist commanders (now deceased) Salah Shehada and Ahmed Jabari, and Hamas founder Ibrahim al-Muqadama.

No change in policy on weapons deliveries to Israel, US says

August 14, 2014

No change in policy on weapons deliveries to Israel,US says

By MICHAEL WILNER, HERB KEINON 08/14/2014 21:46

Without issuing full denial of report that White House ordered halt of delivery of Hellfire missiles, administration officials say claims were a mischaracterization of inter-agency procedure, unchanged policy.

via No change in policy on weapons deliveries to Israel, US says | JPost | Israel News.

 

US President Barack Obama.
Photo: REUTERSWASHINGTON — The Obama administration denied on Thursday that it was surprised by the processing of a munitions delivery by the Pentagon to Israel during its operation in Gaza last month.
 

Without issuing a full-throated denial of a report that the White House issued a halt on the delivery of Hellfire missiles, administration officials said the claims, first surfacing in the Wall Street Journal, were a mischaracterization of inter-agency procedure, and of a policy unchanged.
Related:

Report: US halted weapons transfer to Israel during Gaza offensive
Politicians weigh in on ‘crisis in US-Israel relations’

“Let me be clear: there has been no change in policy, period,” State Department deputy spokeswoman Marie Harf said. “Given the crisis in Gaza, it is natural that agencies take additional care with deliveries as part of an inter-agency process.”

During Operation Protective Edge, the Pentagon said that the delivery was standard, and part of the United States’ commitment to Israel’s qualitative military edge, both through their maintaining broad defensive and offensive capabilities.

Harf said that the “additional care” taken by the administration does not represent a “permanent change in process.”

At the initial revelation of the July sales, media outlets in the Middle East slammed the administration for the timing of the deliveries, in the heat of the crisis.

But Harf also pushed back strongly at the notion that the US reviewed its process due to media pressures. “This has nothing to do with publicity,” she said.

Earlier Thursday, Israeli officials reaffirmed the oft-repeated mantra Thursday that under the Obama administration US-Israel security ties have never been better, even as the Wall Street Journal reported that the White House is holding up the sale of precision Hellfire missiles to Jerusalem.

According to the piece, the Obama administration has tightened its control of arms transfers to Israel, requiring White House and State Department approval for even routine munitions requests by Israel.

“Instead of being handled as a military-to-military matter, each case is now subject to review—slowing the approval process and signaling to Israel that military assistance once taken for granted is now under closer scrutiny,” the story said.

The report came out on the same day that the Hurriyet Daily News reported that the US cleared a potential $320 million advanced medium-range air-to-air missiles (AMRAAM) sale to Turkey “amid increasing security risks in the region.”

The decision for White House and State Department oversight over arms requests by Israel is the seeming culmination of a series of very public disagreements between the two allies over the Gaza conflict, with Israel unhappy with the way the US tried to bring Qatar and Turkey into cease-fire negotiations last month, and Washington upset at what it considered the often “heavy-handed” way Israel fought the war and caused civilian casualties.

The Wall Street Journal piece was just the latest in a series of stories over the last few weeks reporting of a “new low” in relations between Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama.

Other incidents in recent weeks that added fuel to the sense of a crisis in the ties were the following

* Netanyahu allegedly telling US envoy Dan Shapiro earlier in the month, after Hamas violated a cease-fire and killed three IDF soldiers in Rafah, that the US should never “second guess” him on Hamas.

* The leak of an alleged transcript of an Obama-Netanyahu conversation where an angry Obama demanded that Israel agree to a cease-fire

* The White House calling the shelling of a UN facility that lead to innocent deaths as “disgraceful.”

* Israeli anger at a US cease-fire proposal that would have given an enhanced Turkish and Qatari role, followed by US anger that Israel allegedly leaked the draft proposal and was disrespectful in its criticism of US Secretary of State John Kerry.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the phone conversation between Netanyahu and Obama on Wednesday was also “combative,” a characterization denied in Jerusalem.

The paper said that the Gaza conflict has convinced many administration officials that Netanyahu and his national security team were “both reckless and untrustworthy.” Israeli officials were quoted as saying that the Obama administration was weak and naive, and that they were trying to bypass the White House in favor of allies in Congress and elsewhere in the administration.

A senior Obama administration official was quoted as saying “We have many, many friends around the world. The United States is their strongest friend. The notion that they are playing the United States, or that they’re manipulating us publicly, completely miscalculates their place in the world.”

Israeli officials denied the allegations that it was going around the White House to secure arms deliveries. Regarding the Hellfires, the officials said that “we’ve made a request, and we believe the request will be fulfilled.”

At a press conference earlier this month with the foreign press, Netanyahu said that the US has been “terrific” during the current crisis.

Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon’s office, meanwhile, would not commenting on the report, saying only that there was a conversation on Wednesday between Ya’alon and US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel that went well.

In a statement released on Thursday, Ya’alon’s office quoted him as saying “we very much appreciate our relations with the United States. The relations between our security establishments are very good.”

He said that relationships like that between the US and Israel are made even more important because of the challenges posed by extremists in the region, which he listed as Hamas, ISIS, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah and Iran.

Obama and Netanayhu have worked together – some say have had to “deal with each other” – longer than any other US president and Israeli prime minister in history. Charges that the Netanyahu’s famously rocky relationship with Obama is harming the vital Israel-US relationship has been a common theme of his opponents and critics both in Israel and the US over the last six years.

Finance Minister Yair Lapid responded to the Wall Street Journal report by saying it represented a “worrisome trend, and we cannot let it continue.

“The relationship with the US,,” he said, was a “strategic asset that must not be harmed. Sometimes we simply have to know how to say thank you.”

Former president Shimon Peres, during a meeting with visiting New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, also related to the report, saying that he was “full of thanks and appreciation to the US, as are all Israel’s citizens, for firmly standing beside Israel for the 66 years of its existence.”

Meanwhile, a Fox News poll on Wednesday found that 38% of the American public does not think Obama has been supportive enough of Israel. Another 33% think his support has been “about right,” and 18% believe he has been “too supportive.” Eleven percent said they did not know.

Ben Hartman contributed to this report

History of Cease-Fires Shows Israel as the Big Loser

August 14, 2014

A course in Israeli cease-fire 101: Agree to UN and US promises and hold the bag when they are broken.

By: Tzvi Ben-Gedalyahu

Published: August 14th, 2014

via The Jewish Press » » History of Cease-Fires Shows Israel as the Big Loser.

 

Obama to the rescue – of himself.
Photo Credit: White House Photo/Pete Sousa
 

President Barack Obama’s direct contact with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to devise a long-term cease-fire plan follows a long history of American and U.N. ventures that have flopped, all of them at Israel’s expense.

Egypt has been the power broker in trying to maintain a cease-fire between Hamas and Israel, and Obama is trying to put his foot in the Middle East door to reclaim American influence based by whittling down the popularity of Netanyahu.

His “poll numbers are a lot higher than mine” and “were greatly boosted by the war in Gaza,” Obama told Thomas Friedman of The New York Times last week. . “And so if he doesn’t feel some internal pressure, then it’s hard to see him being able to make some very difficult compromises, including taking on the settler movement.”

It’s always the fault of the settlers. If it rains on the picnic, it is because of the settlers. If Obama’s popularity drops, it is because of the settlers who are an obstacle to his illusions.

The war against terror n Gaza has made Netanyahu even more popular. A Knesset Channel poll released this week shows that the Likud party that he heads would win almost 50 percent more seats than it now has in the Knesset if elections were held today. That translated into 28 mandates compared with 19.

Obama must be politically jealous of Netanyahu, considering the president’s dismal ratings.

Jealous or not, Obama has the habit of most previous presidents to pressure Israel, often by blocking or threatening to block military aid. That is what happened during the war, when Obama stopped the United States from shipping missiles to Israel, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Obama’s phone conversation with Netanyahu was reported as “combative,” nothing new for the two leaders who have distrusted each other during the president’s two terms of office.

The American government’s one-track mind for the “peace process” blocks out all reality, which is a lot different in the Middle East than in the United States. The Jewish Home party’s Housing Minister Ur Ariel said it in a matter of fact way on Thursday – “Americans don’t understand what is happening in the region.”

But that doesn’t stop Obama from throwing his weight around and bullying himself into Iraq, Syria and Egypt only to look like a fish out of water.

Like Carter, Clinton and even Regan, Obama has the freedom to exploit Israel’s democracy and run roughshod over the government to “make peace” with cease-fires that make war.

That is what happened in 2012 to conclude the Pillar of Cloud campaign against Hamas terror, and that is what happened in 2009 to conclude the Operation Cast Lead campaign against terror.

That is what happened in 2006, when the United Nations and the United States brokered a cease-fire that ended the Second Lebanese War and promised the moon, whose location has not moved since. Hezbollah was supposed to be dis-armed under United Nations supervision, which is like Hamas agreeing to dis-arm under Mahmoud Abbas’ supervision.

“For proxies such as the Palestinian Sunni faction Hamas and the Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah, the centuries old Islamic jurisprudence of Hudna (tactical truce) and Tahadiya (temporary calm) serve as a plausibly regrouping tactic that is continuously reshaped amid the changing face of modern warfare in the Middle East,” Israel Defense noted during the war.

Enter U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, whose “peace process” and ceasefires self-destruct.

He and U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon orchestrated a humanitarian cease-fire last month. It lasted for 90 minutes. At least five other cease-fires failed.

Israel Defense reported, “Following the inability to transmute any ceasefire, Hudna or Tahadiya over the last decade into encompassing political progress, the tone is that ceasefires only exasperate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the medium-to long-term. Paradoxically, it is the achievement of these bitesize ceasefires as a short term benefit that has trampled on the utility of ceasefire.”

And that is one of the reasons Netanyahu cannot stomach Obama, who in his words knows what is best for Israel, more than Israel knows, just as he and his foreign policy advisers knew what is best for Egypt, Syria and Iraq.

“How can you create a State of Israel that maintains its democratic and civic traditions.” He rhetorically asked Friedman in last week’s interview.

“How can you preserve a Jewish state that is also reflective of the best values of those who founded Israel? And, in order to do that, it has consistently been my belief that you have to find a way to live side by side in peace with Palestinians. … You have to recognize that they have legitimate claims, and this is their land and neighborhood as well.”

That is why Obama wants a cease-fire. He is not concerned about Hamas, he is not concerned about Israel

He is concerned about the “peace process,” which for years has proven to be the “war process.”