Archive for the ‘Iran / Israel War’ category

Defense minister makes unannounced visit to Azerbaijan

September 10, 2014

Defense minister makes unannounced visit to Azerbaijan
Moshe Ya’alon to meet with top officials, inaugurate Israeli pavilion at international defense industry exhibition
BY GAVRIEL FISKE September 10, 2014, 1:28 pm

Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in Baku, Azerbaijan, on September 10, 2014. (photo credit: Ariel Harmoni/Defense Ministry)Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in Baku, Azerbaijan, on September 10, 2014. (photo credit: Ariel Harmoni/Defense Ministry)NEWSROOM
Email the NewsroomFacebookTwitter

RELATED TOPICS
MOSHE YA’ALONISRAEL-AZERBAIJAN RELATIONSILHAM ALIYEV
Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon made an unannounced visit to Baku, Azerbaijan, on Wednesday, the first-ever visit by an Israeli defense minister to the central Asian nation.

Get The Times of Israel’s Daily Edition by email
and never miss our top stories FREE SIGN UP!

Ya’alon, in the country for two days, is to meet with top Azeri officials, including Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov and Defense Minister Zakir Hasanov, for discussions on strengthening Israel-Azeri bilateral relations and strategies for regional issues, the Israeli Defense Ministry said in a Wednesday statement.
The trip was only announced after Ya’alon had arrived.

Israel and Azerbaijan have long maintained cordial ties, which are sometimes a source of tension between Azerbaijan and its neighbor Iran.

The country is seen by some analysts as a linchpin in any possible Israeli military action against Iran’s nuclear program, though Baku has denied it allows Israel to use its bases.

While in Baku, Ya’alon is to attend and inaugurate the Israeli pavilion at the “Adex” international defense industry exhibition. The Defense Ministry is to be represented at the pavilion, along with 15 Israeli defense companies.

“I am happy to be hosted here in the historical first visit of an Israeli defense minister to Azerbaijan,” Ya’alon said upon arrival. “Bilateral relations between us are fruitful, and there is a strategic relationship between the countries and joint endeavors in various fields.”

The arms exhibition represented “another opportunity to show the world the strength and capabilities of Israel’s defense industry and its contribution to security and economy,” he added.

The defense minister is also slated to meet with representatives of Azerbaijan’s small but ancient Jewish community, which Ya’alon said has a “glorious history who has enjoyed wonderful treatment, allowing it to exist in honor.”

 

Henry Kissinger: Iran is a bigger problem than ISIS

September 9, 2014
September 06, 2014 7:50 AM ET
Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger celebrates his 90th birthday, last year in Berlin. In a recent interview with Scott Simon, he gave his thoughts on ISIS, Ukraine and Iran.

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger celebrates his 90th birthday, last year in Berlin. In a recent interview with Scott Simon, he gave his thoughts on ISIS, Ukraine and Iran.

Gero Breloer/AP

Henry Kissinger was a Harvard scholar before he became a mover and shaker in the world of foreign policy. And in his new book, World Order, the former secretary of state under Presidents Nixon and Ford gives a historian’s perspective on the idea of order in world affairs.

Nations are always trying to establish systems to make the world a more orderly place, but they rarely last for long. His book stretches from China under the emperors, Rome surrounded by barbarians and Islam encircled by infidels, to the treaties of Europe and the pivotal positions of Russia and Iran.

On current affairs, Kissinger tells NPR’s Scott Simon why a conflict with the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, is more manageable than a confrontation with Iran, what he would do about the Islamic State, and what he thinks the best solution is for the crisis in Ukraine.


Interview Highlights

On why he views Iran as a “bigger problem than ISIS”

There has come into being a kind of a Shia belt from Tehran through Baghdad to Beirut. And this gives Iran the opportunity to reconstruct the ancient Persian Empire — this time under the Shia label.

From a geo-strategic point of view, I consider Iran a bigger problem than ISIS. ISIS is a group of adventurers with a very aggressive ideology. But they have to conquer more and more territory before they can became a geo-strategic, permanent reality. I think a conflict with ISIS — important as it is — is more manageable than a confrontation with Iran.

On what he would do about ISIS

They have cut the throat of an American on television. This is an insult to the United States, which requires that we demonstrate that this is not an act that is free. I would strongly favor a strong attack on ISIS for a period that is related to the murder of the American.

Then, we have to go into the long-range problem. I think when we are dealing with a unit like ISIS, we should not get into a position where they can lead us by establishing ground forces. But we should set strategic objectives where we thwart any goal they set themselves, which we should be able to do by superior air power. And then, if we can enlist other countries, or other more local groups to do the ground fighting, we might actually destroy them.

On the “Russian enigma” and what he thinks Putin’s Russia wants

The attitude of the West and of Russia towards a crisis like Ukraine is diametrically different. The West is trying to establish the legality of any established border. For Russia, Ukraine is part of the Russian patrimony.

A Russian state was created around Kiev about 1,200 years ago. Ukraine itself has been part of Russia for 500 years, and I would say most Russians consider it part of Russian patrimony. The ideal solution would be to have a Ukraine like Finland or Austria that can be a bridge between these two rather than an outpost.

Kissinger’s reaction to naysayers because of his role during the war in Vietnam, especially the bombing of Cambodia and Laos

They should study what is going on. I think we would find, if you study the conduct of guerrilla-type wars, that the Obama administration has hit more targets on a broader scale than the Nixon administration ever did. …

B-52s have a different bombing pattern. On the other hand, drones are far more deadly because they are much more accurate. And I think the principle is essentially the same. You attack locations where you believe people operate who are killing you. You do it in the most limited way possible. And I bet if one did an honest account, there were fewer civilian casualties in Cambodia than there have been from American drone attacks.

The Vietnam War was a great tragedy for our country. And it is now far enough away so that one can study [it] without using the slogans to see what really happened. And I believe you would find — my position was that of the chief of staff of the president — that the decisions that were taken would almost certainly have been taken by those of you who are listening, faced with the same set of problems. And you would have done them with anguish, as we did them with anguish.

On whether he thinks Hillary Clinton would be a good president

I know Hillary as a person. And as a personal friend, I would say yes, she’d be a good president. But she’d put me under a great conflict of interest if she were a candidate, because I intend to support the Republicans. …

Yes, I’d be comfortable with her as the president.

Disturbing comment by Federica Mogherini “A solution for Syria should include Iran” – And this communist will be EU’s next foreign policy chief!

September 5, 2014

 

Italian Foreign Minister Federica Mogherini

 
Italian Foreign Minister Federica Mogherini
 
Fri Apr 4, 2014 5:6AM GMT

Italian Foreign Minister Federica Mogherini has underscored the need for Iran’s participation in any effort aimed at settling the crisis in Syria.

Speaking at a seminar organized by the Aspen Institute in Rome on Thursday, Mogherini said that the Syrian crisis worries her the most, as it has lingered for three years, with the humanitarian situation getting worse.

Ways should be found to involve Iran and all regional actors, the Italian foreign minister said, adding that ‘otherwise, we do not go forward.’

She further noted that the Syrian conflict should not be overshadowed by the West’s tension with Russia in the wake of Crimea’s integration into the Russian Federation.

Mogherini warned that focusing on new conflicts and forgetting about the old ones would be a historic mistake.

On March 15, the UN secretary general highlighted Iran’s role in resolving the Syrian crisis, urging Tehran to use its influence on Damascus to help revive the talks aimed at ending the conflict in the Arab country.

“Iran is one of the important regional countries who can play an important role, including impressing upon the Syrian authorities to come to the Geneva conference in a more constructive way,” Ban Ki-Moon said after an informal meeting of the UN General Assembly attended by UN-Arab League Special Representative for Syria Lakhdar Brahimi.

The second round of the talks between delegations representing the Syrian government and the foreign-backed opposition in Geneva hit a deadlock in mid-February with both sides sticking to their positions.

The Syrian delegation said fighting terrorism should be the top priority, but the opposition insisted that the formation of a transitional government and resignation of President Bashar al-Assad must come first.

Syria has been gripped by deadly violence since 2011. Some sources say over 140,000 people have been killed and millions displaced due to the violence fueled by Western-backed militants.

Iran has said that it will engage in any diplomatic efforts to bring an end to the crisis in Syria. However, due to opposition by the US and the so-called Syria opposition, Tehran has been excluded from the two rounds of international talks on the crisis.

MP/HJL/HMV

BBC: Why Iran has finally let go of Maliki

August 13, 2014

Why Iran has finally let go of Maliki

File photo of Nouri Maliki and Ayatollah Ali KhameneiPM Nouri Maliki was seen as being close to Iran during his time in office

Less than two months ago, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, spelled out his position on Iraq.

Iran was against US intervention, he said, and the world should respect the results of Iraq’s April election which saw victory for Nouri Maliki’s alliance.

But the ayatollah has been overtaken by events.

“Start Quote

When Maliki started losing and alienating Kurds and Sunnis, Iran didn’t like it”

Ghassan AttiyahAnalyst

The past week has seen the US launch air strikes against Islamic State (IS) militants in northern Iraq, while in Baghdad Mr Maliki has failed in his bid to return to the prime minister’s office.

Although this all goes contrary to Iran’s stated wishes, officials in Tehran have said almost nothing.

“Iran’s silence shows they are happy with what’s happening in Iraq,” says Ghassan Attiyah, president of the Baghdad-based Iraqi Foundation for Development and Democracy.

Mr Attiyah says that Iraq’s new Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi has strong ties to Iran and for this reason the Iranians have not tried to block his nomination.

“They were not happy with Maliki from the beginning but they accepted him because the Shia bloc supported him in parliament,” he says.

“But when he started losing and alienating Kurds and Sunnis, Iran didn’t like it.”

Weapon handlers carry an air to air missile on the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. BushThe US has carried out air strikes in Iraq – but there has been no angry respnse from Iran

Change in tone

Iran has also confounded expectations that it would issue an angry condemnation of the US air strikes this week on IS positions in northern Iraq.

In fact, in a striking change of tone, an advisor to Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said on Monday that Iran and the US should work together to counter IS in Iraq.

Observers say the realisation that the militants are now just 25km (16 miles) from Iran’s western border may well have influenced thinking in Tehran.

It is clear that the threat posed by the Islamic State is another factor in Iran’s decision not to actively oppose the appointment of Mr Abadi as Iraq’s new prime minister.

Unlike US President Barack Obama, Iran’s president has yet to congratulate Mr Abadi on his appointment.

But in a phone call on Monday to congratulate another newly elected leader in the region, Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said a government must be formed in Iraq “as soon as possible”, and that Iran would support “the person who is approved by the majority of Iraqi lawmakers”.

It was the first clear indication that Iran was not intending to stand firmly behind Mr Maliki as it has done for its other regional protege, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Supporters of Iraqi Hezbollah brigades Groups supported by Iran hold considerable sway in Iraqi politics and society

Time’s up

There was more bad news for Mr Maliki on Tuesday when the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Ali Shamkhani, also voiced support for the move in Baghdad to choose a new prime minister.

“Start Quote

Maliki won’t leave easily”

Mohsen MilaniDirector of the Center for Strategic and Diplomatic Studies

Mr Shamkhani’s call for all Iraqi groups and coalitions to keep united and work together to protect national unity seemed like a coded message to Mr Maliki that his time was running out.

The hardline Javan newspaper, affiliated to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, adopted a similar tone.

In an editorial, it called on him to show “selfless compliance” to the Iraqi president’s decision.

The final nail in the coffin was Ayatollah Khamenei lending his support to Mr Abadi’s appointment on Wednesday.

“I hope the designation of the new prime minister in Iraq will untie the knot and lead to the establishment of a new government and teach a good lesson to those who aim for sedition in Iraq,” Ayatollah Khamenei said in a speech to foreign ministry officials and diplomats.

“Maliki won’t leave easily,” says Mohsen Milani, the Iranian-born director of the Center for Strategic and Diplomatic Studies in Washington.

“But if both Iran and the US support the new government, he has to go.”

Mr Maliki said Mr Abadi’s nomination was a “violation of the constitution” but for Iran what is important at the moment is to see a unified Shia bloc in Iraq and a new government formed without further delay.

And if Mr Maliki cannot deliver either of these things, then as far as Iran is concerned, his time is up.

Israel fears Gaza tunnels ‘child’s game’ compared to Hezbollah’s

August 6, 2014

 

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE: לגרסה המקורית בעברית

 

Israel fears Gaza tunnels ‘child’s game’ compared to Hezbollah’s

The Hamas tunnels in the Gaza Strip are “a child’s game” compared with what the Lebanese Hezbollah built during the last two decades, judging by reports published in recent years in the Arab press. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) first encountered the Hezbollah tunnels in southern Lebanon during the Second Lebanon War in 2006. However, according to reports, the tunnels have been upgraded and expanded since, in both equipment and range. It is thus naturally feared that they already reach into Israeli territory, and Iranian experts have been involved in the massive development of the tunnels.

The tunnels dug in southern Lebanon extend south of the Litani River, all the way to the Israeli border. In an article published earlier this year, the Arab news magazine Al Watan Al Arabi reported — apparently, based on bragging by a Hezbollah source — that the tunnels under discussion were most sophisticated, and that “quality-wise, they are on par with the metro tunnels in the major European cities.” These are well-lined tunnels, equipped with highly advanced communication, lighting, control and surveillance means, and with whatever it takes to enable a lengthy stay and battle management over long periods of time, including war rooms.

As far as is known, the Iranians have built underground missile launching sites for Hezbollah that can be operated either manually or by computer. It is one of the lessons learned by Hezbollah in the wake of the Second Lebanon War, when the Israeli Air Force succeeded in destroying vehicle-mounted missile launchers.

It seems that the Iranians and Hezbollah have thought of every detail, leaving nothing out. The tunnels have thus been equipped not only with weapons-storage facilities and command and control equipment, but also with kitchens, bathrooms, clinics and everything needed for a few hundred fighters staying at any given moment inside the tunnels.

Hezbollah has already threatened to take over settlements in the Galilee

It is not clear whether Hezbollah has continued digging the tunnels into Israeli territory. Yet, two factors may be cited in corroboration of this assumption: One of these is the threats made by Hezbollah that in the next confrontation with Israel, its fighters will be able to take over towns and villages in the Galilee in northern Israel. The other factor is the Hamas attack tunnels along the Gaza Strip border. After all, it’s from Hezbollah that Hamas learned the tactics of tunnel warfare.

According to sources in Lebanon, since the Second Lebanon War, Hezbollah has reinforced the “tunnel city” in the Bekaa Valley, being concerned that this could be one of the organization’s weak points. And, in fact, its reasoning has proven true, all the more so since 2011, following the uprising against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Supervised by Iranian experts, and with a large financial investment, Hezbollah has developed a system of tunnels in the Bekaa Valley. One can only imagine what the organization tried to haul through the tunnels or what was actually transferred by the Syrian army through the tunnels in support of Hezbollah since the rebels managed to gain a foothold in the regions controlled by Assad.

The funding for the Hezbollah tunnels comes from Iran, as well as from the income sources of the Shiite organization itself. It is estimated that Iran used to allocate on behalf of Hezbollah a budget of $200 million per year. And following the Second Lebanon War, Iran has reportedly increased this aid budget, through special grants designed to accelerate the restoration of Hezbollah’s power. In addition, there are other government-related agencies in Iran that transfer aid funds to Hezbollah. However, according to various reports, in view of the huge Iranian investment in Syria following the uprising against the Assad regime, which flared up about three and a half years ago, the financial aid granted by Tehran to Hezbollah has been cut.

Over the years, Hezbollah has developed its own independent sources of income. These include, among others, donations — not only from the Arab and Islamic world, but also the West. In Lebanon itself, Hezbollah operates a network of economic interests, including trade, service and investment companies. At the same time, Hezbollah conducts extensive business activity overseas, specifically in the diamond sector. What’s more, Hezbollah has been reported to be involved in drug trafficking and also in document-forgery networks — both inside and outside Lebanon.

The aforementioned article in Al Watan Al Arabi cites a senior Hezbollah official as stating, “International intelligence agencies from time to time send agents to areas where they believe tunnels have been dug, for surveillance and information-gathering purposes. We are aware of that activity; they are welcome to try [to do] whatever they want.”

Completely different terrain, but can be tunneled

Experts approached by Israeli daily Calcalist do not rule out the existence of tunnels in the north, although, as they point out, it is obviously completely different terrain from that in the south. If such infrastructure actually exists or is under construction, Israel should start looking for tunnel location means, not only along its southern border but also in the northern part of the country. Yet, according to the experts, it is not the detection and location means per se that pose the problem, but rather, and above all, the concept adopted by the Israeli security establishment, which relies primarily on military specialists and fails to consult geology professionals.

Yair Rotstein, executive director of the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation and former CEO of the Geophysical Institute of Israel, believes that it is much harder, although quite possible, to dig tunnels in the northern part of the country. “I think that tunnels in the north may be detected sooner than in the south,” he says, but adds in the same breath, “If the tunnels have already been excavated, it could be much more difficult to locate them in the north.”

Dov Frimerman, a geologist who formerly served as a senior executive at the Geophysical Institute of Israel, agrees with Rotstein. “The northern part of the country is characterized by a rocky terrain, which is quite different from the southern terrain, and therefore, it cannot be excavated using simple means, the way it has been done in the south. Hence, excavation activities in the north can be more easily detected.”

As to the ability to detect and locate tunnels, Frimerman notes that quite a number of solutions have been developed for the detection and location of tunnels at the various stages of excavation. He maintains, however, that the major problem currently facing Israel is not the location of tunnels, but rather the concept adopted by the security establishment. “Instead of seeking advice from terrain professionals — whether geologists or physicists, and there are many of those in Israel — specialists who developed the Iron Dome are consulted. However, they are not dealing with the terrain — their field of expertise is optical and electronic sensors. I cannot figure it out; Israel has two institutions dedicated to the exploration of the terrain, boasting an array of experts and vast experience, but neither of them has been tapped.”

Yiftah Shapir, senior research fellow and head of the Middle East Military Balance Project at the Institute for National Security Studies, maintains otherwise. In his opinion, there is currently no technological solution capable of locating all the tunnels. “Everything has been considered and everything has been tried at one time or another — trenches and tunnels were dug, and iron piles were driven into the ground; however, they just dug underneath. Here, they have dug as far deep as 25 meters [82 feet]; in Mexico, they have dug tunnels 40 meters [just over 131 feet] deep; and in [North] Korea, they have already reached 70 meters [close to 230 feet] below ground level.”

Shapir says in conclusion, “It may well be that there is a tunnel shaft near some northern community. Alas, at present, there is no solution. What’s left is intelligence, and in fact, many of the tunnels [in the south] were discovered thanks to intelligence activity.”

Israel will do its best to prevent the restoration of the tunnels in the south

Now that the IDF has reported the destruction of all tunnels leading from Gaza into Israel, Israel and Hamas are bound to start an arms race. Hamas would of course be interested in rebuilding the destroyed tunnels, while Israel will do its best to detect the tunnels before they are dug across the border. Frimerman believes that Israel has time enough to place multiple means of geophonic detection capable of tracing various vibrations in the ground, and thus thwart the excavation of any tunnels along or across the border with Gaza. “The cost of such detection means is not that high, and a surveillance network may be set up in no time along the entire length of the border with Gaza, even before Hamas manages to complete the construction of the tunnels,” he explained.

It is assessed that at the moment, Hamas is capable of building one meter [about 3 feet] of tunnel per day. Hence, the completion of an approximately 2 km [about 1.25 mile] length of tunnel would take quite some time — which Israel could use to position an adequate lineup of alert and detection means. “The State of Israel has no need to look for new means for tunnel detection and location; it just has to convert the means already at its disposal,” said Rotstein. “The technology required to detect tunnels is there, and converting it to meet the IDF’s needs is neither complicated nor costly.”

Frimerman, who acquired vast experience in the location of sinkholes in the Dead Sea region, said that those very means used to locate sinkholes could now be applied to detect tunnels in Gaza.

 

Ahmadinejad: Obama made a big mistake

June 12, 2010

Ahmadinejad: Obama made a big mistake.

SHANGHAI — US President Barack Obama made a “big mistake” in seeking to punish Iran  over its nuclear program, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Friday, slamming Washington but glossing over China’s decision to back new UN Security Council sanctions.

Ahmadinejad, visiting China’s financial hub to tour the Shanghai World Expo, said the latest United Nations resolution, approved Wednesday, was “a worthless piece of paper” and would have little impact.

The effect, if any, he told reporters at a news conference at the Expo, would be to accelerate Iran’s own development.

“The US president thinks by accusing the nation of Iran he can undermine the role of our country in the world. I think President Obama has made a big mistake,” Ahmadinejad said, accusing the US of hypocrisy for leading the drive to censure his country.

Obama “came to power by the motto of change. He said he would abandon the bullying of the former administration. Now he is marching on the same path as Bush did,” Ahmadinejad said.

Iranian president glosses over Chinese about-face

Ahmadinejad’s visit comes two days after host China yielded to international pressure to back a fourth round of nuclear sanctions targeting Iran’s powerful Revolutionary Guard, ballistic missiles and nuclear-related investments in a bid to compel Teheran to cooperate with international inspectors.

As an ally of Iran and permanent member of the Security Council, China could have exercised its veto power to block the sanctions. China’s Foreign Ministry said Thursday that its support should not block efforts to coax Iran back into negotiations.

But Ahmadinejad said such talks could happen only in a “friendly atmosphere.”

“Having dialogue under a hostile atmosphere has no meaning,” he said.

Ahmadinejad skipped Thursday’s summit in Uzbekistan of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which was attended by Chinese President Hu Jintao and was not scheduled to meet Chinese leaders while in China.

But the Iranian leader deflected suggestions that China’s about-face on the sanctions issue might drive a rift between the two countries.

Beijing was apparently satisfied that the sanctions would not harm its economic ties with Iran, with whom bilateral trade reached at least $36.5 billion last year. China relies on Iran for 11 percent of its energy needs and Chinese companies have major investments in Iranian energy extraction projects and the construction of roads, bridges and power plants.

“We have very good relations with China and we have no reason to weaken our relations with China,” Ahmadinejad said. “We are confronting the United States. The main problem is the US administration. We have no problem with others.”

‘The Zionist regime is doomed, Obama does not know the world well’

He accused the US and other nuclear powers of intimidating other Security Council members into siding against Iran, and lashed out at the West for supporting Israel.

“The Zionist regime is doomed,” said Ahmadinejad, who has repeatedly called for Israel’s destruction and denied the Holocaust.

The Iranian leader insisted that efforts to stop his country from enriching uranium were unjustified and aimed at preventing it and other developing countries from acquiring needed nuclear power technology.

“The nuclear issue is just a pretext. The government of the US is going to swallow the entire Middle East region. Under that context, they are going to control the whole world,” he said. “I should say Iran will never allow the United States to do so.”

“Even if they tear out our throats, it will not happen,” he said.

Ahmadinejad returned repeatedly to the issue of Obama’s role in the sanctions issue, saying the move was an insult.

“I think Mr. Obama does not know the world very well,” he said. “We will never be shaken by people like President Obama.”

Ahmadinejad: Obama must seize ‘historic opportunity’ for improved Iran cooperation

May 26, 2010

Ahmadinejad: Obama must seize ‘historic opportunity’ for improved Iran cooperation – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

Iran President urges U.S. to accept nuclear swap deal, warns that if Obama reaches point of no return, his ‘path to friendship with Iran will be blocked forever.’

By The Associated Press

Iran’s president on Wednesday urged U.S. President Barack Obama to accept a nuclear fuel swap deal, warning the U.S. leader will miss a historic opportunity for improved cooperation from Tehran if the offer is rejected.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad waving to the media in  Tehran Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
waving to the media in Tehran on May 18, 2010.
Photo by: AP

Mahmoud Ahamdinejad also issued a stern warning to Russia, saying Moscow’s support for the U.S.-led push for a new round of United Nations sanctions against Iran was contrary to the two countries’ neighborly and friendly relations.

Washington has denounced the Iranian offer – brokered last week by Brazil and Turkey – as a ploy by Tehran to avoid a new round of UN sanctions over its controversial nuclear program, which the West fears is geared toward nuclear weapons.

“There are people in the world who want to pit Mr. Obama against the Iranian nation and bring him to the point of no return, where the path to his friendship with Iran will be blocked forever,” Ahmadinejad said during a rally in the southern town of Kerman.

Iran proposed last week to ship much of its low-enriched uranium to Turkey in return for nuclear fuel rods needed for a Tehran medical research reactor. The fuel swap would diminish Iran’s stockpile of low-enriched uranium that can possibly be used in making atomic bombs, if the uranium is enriched to a higher, weapons-grade level.

But the proposal did not deter U.S., Russia, China, Britain and France – the five permanent Security Council members – from agreeing on a draft fourth set of sanctions against Iran for refusing to completely halt uranium enrichment, as demanded by the United Nations.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Tuesday said in the Chinese capital Beijing, that Tehran’s offer, submitted on Monday to the UN’s nuclear watchdog, was inadequate and did not address international concerns about Iran’s atomic ambitions.

Tehran’s offer is similar to a UN-drafted plan that Washington and its allies last year pressed Iran to accept, but which the Mideast nation rejected at the time.

“If they [U.S. and its allies] are truthful when they say they seek cooperation … they should accept this offer,” Ahmadinejad said. But if they seek excuses, they should know that the path to any interaction will be closed.

“Mr. Obama must know that this proposal is a historic opportunity … [Obama should] know that if this opportunity is lost, I doubt the Iranian nation will give a new chance to this gentleman in the future,” he added.

Ahmadinejad also singled out Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, saying the neighboring country’s leader had caved in to U.S. pressure for new sanctions on Tehran.

“Justifying the behavior of Mr. Medvedev today has become very difficult,” he said. “The Iranian nation doesn’t know whether [Russians] ultimately are friends, whether they stand by us or are after other things. This is not acceptable.”

The unusually harsh words for Russia reflect a strain in Tehran’s relations with Moscow, a longtime trade partner of Iran with more leverage over it than Western nations. Ahmadinejad said Moscow had no excuse for giving in to U.S. pressure, and urged Medvedev to change his stance.

“I hope Russian leaders and officials pay attention to these sincere words and correct themselves, and not let the Iranian nation consider them among its enemies,” he said.

Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful, and that uranium enrichment is meant exclusively for power generation. Tehran needs the fuel rods to power the research reactor, which also produces medical isotopes to treat cancer patients.

Ahmadinejad warned the reactor is running out of fuel, and stressed that the International Atomic Energy Agency has a responsibility to supply nuclear fuel needed by member countries.

IAF Targets Terror Tunnels in Southern and Northern Gaza Strip

May 21, 2010

IAF Targets Terror Tunnels in Southern and Northern Gaza Strip.

21 May 2010 , 10:26

Approximately 50 rockets have landed in Israeli territory since the beginning of 2010. photo:

In a joint IDF- ISA activity, The Israel Air Force struck two terror tunnels in the southern Gaza Strip and one terror tunnel in the northern Gaza Strip overnight. The tunnels were dug one kilometer from the security fence and were intended for infiltrating into Israel and executing terror attacks against Israeli civilians or IDF soldiers. Direct hits were identified.

The attack is in response to the two rockets that hit Israeli territory in the past two days, landing in the Eshkol Regional Council and the Hof Ashkelon Regional Council.

Approximately 50 rockets have landed in Israeli territory since the beginning of 2010, and over 330 rockets were fired from the Gaza Strip into Israel since the end of operation Cast Lead. .

Link to file :
Title :
Url :

White House Mends Fences with Israel

May 21, 2010

DEBKA.

Midterm Elections and Cold War Reinstate Israel as Key Player
C-130 “Hercules”

US President Barack Obama plans to dramatize his new appreciation of Israel as America’s long-trusted friend and strategic ally for the benefit of the American-Jewish and Israeli public.
One possible action, according to DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s sources in Washington, is a second visit to Jerusalem by Vice President Joe Biden as a gesture of goodwill toward Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, in sharp contrast to his disastrous visit in March, when Israel’s announcement of a construction project in East Jerusalem was used to inflame a deep crisis in relations.
Biden will be taxed with explaining that such incidents as the insulting reception afforded the Israeli prime minister on his White House visit on April 23 were a thing of the past and the administration was intent on putting relations back on track, with emphasis on the president’s unshakable commitment to Israel’s security.
Certain important gestures have already been forthcoming from Washington, although they received far less media play than the crisis.
In the first week of April, Obama ordered the Pentagon to release C-130J air transports to Israel. He had previously embargoed these aircraft because they could be used to drop Israel commando forces inside Iran in case of a decision to attack its nuclear facilities. The President had $98.6 million transferred to Lockheed Martin to pay for the delivery of the first nine transports.

Smart bombs for Israel and pursuit of American-Jewish leaders

On May 9, the President released a shipment to the Israeli Air Force of various types of smart bombs – most of them effective against the fortified locations and the weapons systems used by the Lebanese Hizballah, the Palestinian Hamas in Gaza and the Syrian army. The consignment also included Laser-Guided Joint Direct Attack Munitions system, called LJDAM, which was developed jointly by the US Boeing company Israel’s Elbit for improving the accuracy of bombs fired from a maximum distance of 28 kilometers in all weathers.
On May 20, US Congress overwhelming endorsed President Obama’s request for $205 million to help Israel build the new rocket defense system “Iron Dome.
Thursday, May 13, top White House aides, led by the President’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, Senior Advisor to the President on Iranian Affairs Dennis Ross, and NSC Middle East desk chief Dan Shapiro (whose brief includes Israel), addressed a delegation of 15 leading American rabbis.
Rahm admitted the administration had “screwed up the messaging” to Israel and said “it will take more than one month to make up for 14 months.”
The White House fielded its top officials to show American-Jewish community leaders that the president was wholehearted in revising his attitude toward Israel and this group had been entrusted with following through on his directives.
Tuesday, May 18, Jewish Democratic members of the House and Senate were invited to a private meeting with President Obama and heard him admit he got “some toes blown off” making missteps in sensitive US-Israel relations. The lawmakers praised the administration’s effort to put forward tough sanctions against Iran and put to rest White House recriminations against Israel.
“It was a good meeting, but it was not a feel-good meeting – everyone spoke their minds and from the heart,” said Eliot Engel (D-Bronx & Westchester). “The President wants to see peace. We all want to see peace as well.”
The unprecedented 90-minute meeting took place in the Eisenhower Old Executive Office Building.

Stop badgering Israel, make Palestinians pull their weight

Between the two meetings with American Jewish leaders, senior administration emissaries were dispatched to Israel with orders to secretly meet Israel figures seen by Washington as influential and convey three messages:
1. President Obama was burying the hatchet with Israel – less to get out the Jewish vote and boost his Democrats’ hopes for Nov. 2 midterm elections, and more out of new strategic needs arising from the outbreak of a virtual Cold War between Washington and Moscow.
Middle East envoy George Mitchell had been instructed by the president in person to refrain from pressuring Israel to be the only side constantly badgered for concessions in the proximity talks with the Palestinians. He was told to accept Israel’s limits and starting leaning hard on the Palestinians to make them pull their weight too.
2. The President’s messengers reported that he had come to understand that as long as there was no one he could count on in the Arab world, the US and Israel must work together on ways to counteract the Iranian-Turkish-Syrian bloc and its input from Moscow.
Egypt’s president Hosni Mubarak is too busy transferring the reins of government to his son Gemal Mubarak to be called on, while Saudi Arabia’s loss of Lebanon and Hamas to the Syrian-Iranian orbit has made its king indifferent to outside events.
Moscow was capitalizing on is reputation for cooperating with Washington, but the White House knew this was an act to cover up its return to Cold War tactics against the United States.
Without saying so explicitly, DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s sources report that the American officials implied that the Obama administration would soon turn to Israel to talk about resuming the intelligence partnership which was so fruitful in the Cold War years of the 1960s and 1970s.
For the moment, Prime Minister Netanyahu is taking Obama’s gestures of friendship with great caution and refraining from referring publicly to the new face the White House appears to be presenting to Jerusalem. He is waiting to see what steps come next and, above all, keeping an open mind until after the November 2 elections before deciding on his response.

Handling Tehran’s Brazil-Brokered Fait Accompli

May 21, 2010

DEBKA.

It May Not Be All Bad, Say Obama’s People
Susan Rice

The coup pulled off in Tehran by Brazil and Turkey with Russian backing was contrived too deftly for US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice to unravel – even by lightning diplomatic sleight of hand.
To rescue the administration’s Iran policy from total collapse, the two worked at top speed to cobble together a sanctions motion feeble enough to command a broad front and have it tabled at the UN Security Council on Tuesday, May 18 – a bare 24 hours after Brazilian and Turkish leaders had Iran sign a 10-point commitment to deposit less than half of its low-grade enriched uranium in Turkey in exchange for fuel rods.
To gain Russian and Chinese endorsement, the draft’s content was heavily watered down with hardly any new measures proposed. This process finally cut short Washington’s serpentine efforts to get Moscow and Beijing to collaborate on tough sanctions for halting Iran’s acquisition of a nuclear bomb. So, to keep the vestigial draft motion moving along the rutted path up to Security Council approval, there will have to be more chops and changes.
All the same, the week’s debacles over Iran prompted a new, hopeful line of thinking in Washington. Administration officials told DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s Washington sources the cloud may have a silver lining, after all. They argued that, in the end, Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva “Lula” and Turkish prime minister Recep Erdogan undeniably managed to extract three concessions which Iran denied in former rounds of talks with the Six-Power bloc of the US, Russia, China, France, the UK and Germany.

Obama officials see a silver lining

1. After endless haggling, Iran has agreed to ship a total of 1,200 kilograms of its lightly enriched uranium overseas for further enrichment.
2. It has also consented to shipping the entire quantity all in one batch abroad, after long insisting on dribs and drabs. Washington’s main consideration was and is that it is safe to leave Iran with enough enriched uranium for building one or two bombs because it was sure Tehran would not cross that threshold until it had enough weapons-grade uranium in hand for assembling an arsenal of 10 to 12 warheads.
3. Tehran had always objected to the enriched uranium swap taking place outside Iran. Now, Turkey was accepted as a clearing house for the exchange.
Those sources go on to argue that if Tehran could be prevailed upon to give way on those three points, why not go for more? More concessions might be going with the right kind of pressure – not necessarily from the United States. US officials accordingly drafted a set of demands which they believe are worth presenting to Tehran in the hope of a substantial reward. If they are met, then a US-Iranian nuclear showdown might be delayed by a year – or even two – and the risk averted of an Israeli military attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.

The three concessions as building blocks for more

These are the new demands:
A. Iran must abandon its announced intention of continuing to enrich uranium at home from a low 3.5 percent to 19.5 percent grade. Since the Iranian-Turkish-Brazilian agreement allows for overseas processing to 19.5 percent, Iran has nothing to lose by halting the centrifuges spinning at its plants since February. According to our Iranian sources, some 300 kilograms of uranium enriched to 20- percent are already in stock.
B. If Iran complies with A., Washington will guarantee a regular supply of fuel rods for the light water reactor at Bushehr which the Russians have promised to have up and running by late summer. This would entail the US withdrawing its strong objections to Russia finishing the reactor, while at the same time internationalizing the supply of fuel rods and taking it out of Moscow’s hands.
C. Iran’s consent to the reprocessing of low-grade enriched uranium outside its borders must be extended to further quantities. Since negotiations began last year, the 1,200 kilos of low-enriched uranium to be exported – then three-quarters of Iran’s total stock – has almost doubled.
The Americans will ask Tehran to split future amounts into batches of predetermined size for overseas upgrading to 19.5 percent, and insist that the reprocessing take place in Russia, France or Holland, the only countries with the technology for making the product unusable for military purposes.
In this way, Iran would never accumulate enough of this product for further enrichment to weapons-grade.
D. Iran must fully comply with the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency’s demand to open up more nuclear facilities to monitors and admit more inspectors to its suspected military projects.
E. Iran must give part with answers to long years of IAEA queries about the military aspects of its nuclear industry.
Who will put these demands to Iran? Its Brazilian or Turkish chums? Or why not let the IAEA take this starring role in future nuclear diplomacy and recover some of its lost relevance? But first, the Obama administration needs to find out if there are any real grounds for its sudden upbeat mood after a lousy week – in other words, will Tehran play along and meet those five demands?
The answer is brutally clear: Not a chance, say DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s Iranian sources. Tehran will never negotiate on – or lay to rest – any queries about the military nature of its nuclear program.
Transparency there is not an option.