Archive for the ‘Dog and Pony Show’ category

Obama negotiator says she didn’t see final Iran ‘side deals’

August 5, 2015

Obama negotiator says she didn’t see final Iran ‘side deals,’ The Hill, Kristina Wong, August 5, 2015

(Were the secret agreements on which Kerry, et al, were “fully briefed” and hence know “exactly” what they say also “rough drafts?” Unlike Ms. Sherman, Kerry testified that he had not seen the secret agreement(s).– DM)

shermanwendy_052715gettyGetty Images

[L]ater in the hearing, she walked back her comments about not seeing the final arrangements. 

“I was shown documents that I believed to be the final documents, but whether there were any further discussions…” she added before being cut off by another question by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.). Later, she said responded, “I have” when asked whether she saw the final versions of the deals.

****************

The only Obama administration official to view confidential “side deals” between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) admitted Wednesday she and her team have only seen rough drafts.

“I didn’t see the final documents. I saw the provisional documents, as did my experts,” said Wendy Sherman, a lead U.S. negotiator for the deal, at a Senate Banking Committee hearing.  

Sherman, undersecretary of State for political affairs, said she was only allowed to see the confidential deals “in the middle of the negotiation” when the IAEA “wanted to go over with some of our experts the technical details.” 

She maintained the deals — which focus on with Iran’s prior work on a bomb and access to Iran’s Parchin military site — are still confidential and can’t be submitted to Congress.

Sherman said the U.S. did not protest to the confidentiality of the agreements, despite the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act demanding all related agreements, because the administration wanted the IAEA to respect the confidentiality of their agreements with the U.S.

“We want to protect U.S. confidentiality … this is a safeguards protocol. The IAEA protects our confidential understandings … between the United States and the IAEA,” she said.

However, later in the hearing, she walked back her comments about not seeing the final arrangements.

“I was shown documents that I believed to be the final documents, but whether there were any further discussions…” she added before being cut off by another question by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.). Later, she said responded, “I have” when asked whether she saw the final versions of the deals.

She also argued they could not be submitted to Congress because the administration does not have the deals, and that the Senate had “every single document” the administration has.

Sherman emphasized she would brief Senators later Wednesday afternoon in a classified session on everything she knows about the deal.

A similar briefing for House lawmakers last week did not assuage concerns for Rep. Ed Royce (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who sent a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry on Monday calling on the administration to submit the deals.

She also noted that IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano was meeting with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee later in the afternoon.

Although she said the U.S. did not ask or pressure Amano to conduct the briefing, she suggested it was a gesture beyond what the IAEA is obligated to do.

Todd: No One Will Say The Iran Agreement Is A Great Deal

August 5, 2015

Todd: No One Will Say The Iran Agreement Is A Great Deal, Washington Free Beacon, August 5, 2015

NBC’s Chuck Todd said Wednesday that American sentiment about the Iran nuclear agreement is tepid because, while Americans want to engage in diplomacy, they do not trust Iran or the Ayatollah to keep his word.

“You haven’t hear anybody say this is a great deal,” Todd said on Morning Joe. “’This is a workable deal’ is about the best argument you hear for it.”

As the public opinion of the Iran deal suffers, President Obama has maintained that his deal is the only option to prevent war with the largest state sponsor of terrorism. Americans oppose the Iran agreement by a 2-1 margin.

“There is nobody excited about this deal,” Todd said.

Critics of the Iran deal point to Iran’s actions causing chaos in the Middle East as an indicator of why the deal is misguided. If Iran complies with the terms of the agreement, sanctions will be lifted giving the regime well over $100 billion of its own money that was previously frozen. Side deals between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Iran have also raised alarms, especially about the ability to inspect Iran’s nuclear facilities.

“I feel the president should be acknowledging that this isn’t a perfect deal more often,” Todd said. “I feel like they oversell the deal sometimes.”

 

Let’s Sign It So We Can See What’s In It

July 1, 2015

US prepares for ‘staggeringly consequential’ Iran deal

By MICHAEL WILNER 06/29/2015 Via The Jerusalem Post

ShowImage
Kerry: “Please allow me to direct your attention to page 2,563 in the English version. For those who wish to follow me in the Farsi version, please turn to page 2.” [Photo Credit: Reuters]

(Let see…probably thousands of pages long, English and Farsi versions, no outsiders allowed to see the document…hmmm. – LS)

The document is largely written, but the toughest negotiations come down to the wording of key annexes.

VIENNA – The deal at hand with Iran over its nuclear program will be a single, comprehensive text, annexes and all, in English and in Farsi, with “staggeringly consequential” effects on the security of the world, a senior US official said on Monday.

Entering a self-imposed deadline for that text, scheduled for Tuesday, the work of negotiators remained incomplete. Political decisions from all sides await. Lawyers still have to review the document once its finished.

But the American team hopes to adopt a final text within days – formally achieving agreement on a Comprehensive Joint Plan of Action.

The United States, Britain, France, Russia, China, and Germany say the CJPOA will adequately restrict Iran’s ability to obtain nuclear weapons.

The negotiations are in their final round here in the Austrian capital, where the foreign ministers of each nation are to arrive on Tuesday.

The entire US team, already here in Vienna, is preparing for the adoption of the text in two ways. First and foremost, they say, they are inspecting each provision with intricate care.

Each of those provisions, one official said, includes “a hundred details,” from the fate of heavy water in Iran’s plutonium facility in Arak to the precise language of a United Nations Security Council resolution that will codify the deal.

There are innumerable interwoven details, the official said, “not least of all, what technical experts tell us is real or not.”

While June 30 had been the deadline for a comprehensive deal, negotiators have been prepared to negotiate through the deadline for several weeks.

They are not, however, considering any long-term extension of the current round.

Phasing in a deal has become a negotiation in and of itself.

The Obama administration says to expect a multi-phase process that begins with the adoption of the agreement, then enters a period of procedural implementation, and is followed by a moment the deal “goes live” and all provisions activate.

“There wasn’t paper out of Lausanne. You didn’t have a text. You had parameters,” the senior US official said, on the condition of anonymity.

“You are going to have a text…it will be evident to everyone what has been agreed.”

The official said the US team expects a “roller coaster” entering the final days of their effort, similar to what they have experienced over two years of negotiations.

“We know what we need,” the official said, “and we’ll deal with what comes.”

US Secretary of State John Kerry held meetings internally on Monday, as well as one meeting with the head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, an independent body that will be tasked with monitoring Iran’s nuclear sites under the deal.

He is to meet Tuesday with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, who traveled to Tehran on Monday to consult on the deal’s final stage with the country’s supreme leader. Zarif plans to return from Iran early on Tuesday morning.

Also scheduled to arrive on Tuesday is Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who is to meet with Kerry at some point in the afternoon.

Over the weekend, one Chinese official said they expect the document to be “finalized on schedule, or maybe within a week.” The European Union’s high representative for foreign affairs, Federica Mogherini, said the parties are not considering an extension beyond that point.

Everyone at the table “feels the burden of the responsibility” for this deal, the US official said. “Making this decision to actually do the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action is a very, very, very big decision for everybody.”

It’s a decision that Israel hopes the negotiators will postpone.

One of the fundamental disagreements Israel and the US have over a possible deal is that, while Israel views Iran as the main problem in the region, the US views it as part of the solution, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon said on Monday.

Ya’alon, at a briefing with diplomatic reporters in his Tel Aviv office, said that world powers and Iran are headed to a nuclear agreement, even if Tuesday’s deadline is not met, and that despite some last minute delays, the negotiations are not on the verge of collapse.

“What is clear is that this is a bad agreement,” he said. “After it is signed, we will have a nuclear threshold Iran.”

He said that the agreement does not close any Iranian nuclear facilities or dismantle centrifuges, and only suspends the Iranian nuclear program, which he said clearly has a military element.

Ya’alon said that despite the disagreements with Washington, the close channels of communication and cooperation between Israel and the US remain open. He asserted that Israel has influenced the agreement being worked out, and wants to continue to do so as much as possible.

After the agreement is signed, he said, Israel will likely enter in talks with the US over what is needed to preserve its qualitative military edge, not only because of the threat from Iran, but also since Washington has promised state-of-the-art weapons systems to some Arab states in the region that also feel threatened by Iran.