Source: The new Arab boycott
A major economic conference was supposed to take place last week. There was no international clamor, there were no demonstrations on campuses, the BDS anti-Israel brigade were nowhere in sight, but the conference still failed due to a boycott.
Surprisingly, this wasn’t a conference that was supposed to be held in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem—it was the Fourth Arab Economic and Social Development Summit, held in Beirut and boycotted by the leaders of the Arab countries, with the exception of Qatar and Mauritania.
Is the Arab world boycotting Lebanon? Officially, no. In practice, yes. Like so many problems in the Middle East, Iran was the reason this time as well. Lebanon could have been the most prosperous country in the Arab world, wrote Abdulrahman al-Rashed, former editor of the Asharq Al-Awsat daily and current director-general of Al-Arabiya, but that will never happen because Iran controls Lebanon.
Al-Rashed wrote: “The region is experiencing a series of crises, whose common denominator is a connection to Iran. Unfortunately Lebanon will not be stable, the Palestinians will achieve neither statehood nor normal life, in Yemen, Iraq and Syria there is no hope for a better future for as long as Iran continues with its policy of causing chaos there,” he said.
As opposed to former US president Jimmy Carter and Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom, who subscribe to the belief that everything wrong in the region is down to “the oppression of the Palestinians by Israel,” courageous elements in the Arab world, such as al-Rashid, are pointing the finger at Iran.
Iran, regardless of the bust that was the Beirut conference, is in trouble. Before the nuclear agreement of July 2015 was reached, the sanctions against Iran had led to a slump in the country’s GDP per capita, from $7,832 in 2012 to $4,862 in 2015 (for comparison, the Israeli GDP per capita in 2015 was $36,690). Two years on from the nuclear agreement and the easing of sanctions, that figure was $ 5,593 in 2017 (in Israel, it was $40, 270.) But because the US has decided to renew the sanctions, Iran’s situation is once again deteriorating.
For years, the country has been suffering from drought. The area surrounding Tehran itself is on the decline, which could cause an environmental disaster of an unknown magnitude. The only one of its neighbor with the ability to cope with the drought is Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu even offered help. It would have been wonderful for Iran to choose regional cooperation over developing nuclear weapons and financing subversion in every possible corner of the Arab world, but it didn’t.
Instead, the ayatollahs prefer to invest billions in the industry of death to solving the serious problem of it physically sinking. Admittedly, this is the eternal problem of radical Islam, Sunni and Shi’ite—it always chooses destruction over development and prosperity.
And this is where one of the global scams of the modern age comes in. The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement may dent Israel’s image, but it certainly does not upend reality as it claims to. Instead of the Western educated elite recognizing that the main problem in the Muslim world is religious extremism and jihad, those members of the elite are busy cultivating the conspiracy that Israel is the problem. This is of no help to Muslims in general and the Palestinians in particular. On the contrary, it transforms those westerners into the propaganda arm of Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas. While this is a great way to perpetuate the problem, it definitely is not the way to effect change.
From an Arab perspective, things look different. While the word “refugees” was bandied about repeatedly at the conference, this time it meant Syrians, and the Palestinians were not mentioned at all. The Palestinians have become a kind of chronic illness, with no real expectation that this issue will ever be resolved. But so that the Syrian refugees do not become refugees forever, the talk of them returning home—willingly or otherwise—is gaining momentum.
Al-Rashed correctly defined Iran as the region’s central problem. It is a definition accepted by most of the leaders of the Arab states, whose take a similar stance to Israel. It is a pity that something is becoming increasingly understood in the Arab world is less and less understood by the progressives of the West.
Source: Israel alerts UN to more Hezbollah tunnels in Lebanon, heading toward Israel | The Times of Israel
None of these tunnels has reached the Israeli border, unlike the six tunnels destroyed by the IDF in recent weeks
The Israeli government has passed information to the United Nations detailing the existence of additional “underground infrastructure” belonging to Hezbollah along the Israeli-Lebanese border, The Times of Israel has learned, including tunnels headed toward Israeli territory that were not destroyed in the IDF’s recent Operation Northern Shield.
Hezbollah’s construction work on these additional tunnels ceased last month when the terror organization realized its plans were known by the Israeli side. None of the new tunnels had reached the Israeli border, unlike the six tunnels that have been destroyed by Israel.
The additional tunnels, all of which are in Lebanese territory, are known to Israeli intelligence and are within Israel’s operational reach, an Israeli official said.
The official confirmed a similar claim to this effect made by the Israeli military earlier this month.
“The IDF is monitoring and is in possession of a number of sites where Hezbollah is digging underground infrastructure that has yet to cross into Israeli territory,” the army said on January 13.
On Sunday, former IDF chief Gadi Eisenkot said Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s assertion in a Saturday night interview that there are things Israel doesn’t know regarding Hezbollah’s tunnel program “is flat wrong.”
On December 4, Israel launched Operation Northern Shield to find and destroy Hezbollah cross-border attack tunnels, and on January 13, the military announced it had found all such passages and was working to demolish them.
In a three-hour-long interview with the pro-Hezbollah al-Mayadeen TV on Saturday, Nasrallah said that the tunnels project began before the 2006 Second Lebanon War, and, indeed, one tunnel destroyed by the IDF in its recent operation was started before 2006. The Shiite organization’s tunnels project was only exposed in 2014.
Nasrallah, in his interview, had claimed: “The uncovering of the tunnels does not affect by 10 percent our plans to take over the Galilee. If we decide to do it — even if they’ve destroyed the tunnels — can’t we rebuild them?” He also suggested there may be attack tunnels on the Israeli-Lebanese border which Israel has not yet discovered.
The Times of Israel has also confirmed that the rocket launched at Israel last week from Syria that was destroyed by the Iron Dome system over Mount Hermon was likely fired by troops belonging to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and not by a Shiite militia, and had been shipped to Syria from Iran. The missile was fired from one of the southern neighborhoods of Damascus, near Sayeda Zeinab, a Shiite holy site.
Israel believes Iran currently has some 2,000 IRGC personnel in Syria, and thousands more members of Shiite militias under their command. The government believes that the number of Iranians on Syrian soil has fallen to one-third of what it was a few years ago; Iran has reduced its presence in Syria, but not removed it. Hezbollah, too, has significantly reduced its forces in Syria.
Iran officially denies having a military presence in Syria; it says it has advisers there.
Judah Ari Gross contributed to this report.
Source: Iran general says Tehran aims to wipe Israel off the ‘global political map’ | The Times of Israel
Revolutionary Guard deputy leader Hossein Salami warns Israel that any war it starts ‘will end with its elimination’
The deputy head of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said Monday that Tehran’s strategy was to eventually wipe Israel off the “global political map.”
Asked by a reporter in Tehran about Israeli threats to strike Iranian forces deployed in Syria, Brig. Gen. Hossein Salami was quoted by Iranian news outlets as saying, “Our strategy is to erase Israel from the global political map. And it seems that, considering the evil that Israel is doing, it is bringing itself closer to that.”
He added: “We announce that if Israel does anything to start a new war, it will obviously be the war that will end with its elimination, and the occupied territories will be returned. The Israelis will not have even a cemetery in Palestine to bury their own corpses.”
Salami’s comments followed a series of reciprocal taunts by Israeli and Iranian leaders in recent weeks as tensions have risen on the Israeli-Syrian border between IDF and Iranian forces.
Last week, Israel reportedly conducted a rare daylight missile attack on Iranian targets in Syria. In response, Iran fired a surface-to-surface missile from Syria at the northern Golan Heights, which was intercepted by the Iron Dome missile defense system over the Mount Hermon ski resort, according to the Israel Defense Forces.
Hours later, in the predawn hours of January 21, the Israeli Air Force launched retaliatory strikes on Iranian targets near Damascus and on the Syrian air defense batteries that fired upon the attacking Israeli fighter jets, the army said.
Twenty-one people were killed in the Israeli raids in Syria on January 21, 12 of them Iranian fighters, a Britain-based Syrian war monitor said the following day.
According to Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, 12 of those killed were members of Salami’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, six were Syrian military fighters, and the other three were other non-Syrian nationals.
Israel sees Iranian entrenchment in Syria as a major threat and in recent years has carried out hundreds of airstrikes in Syria against targets linked to Iran, which alongside its proxies and Russia is fighting on behalf of the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Earlier this week, Iran’s military chief of staff indicated Tehran was preparing to adopt offensive military tactics to protect its national interests, an apparent reference to its posture in Syria toward Israel.
“Among the country’s broad strategies, there is a defensive strategy. We defend the independence and territorial integrity and national interests of the country,” Gen. Mohammad Bagheri was quoted as saying by Press TV on Sunday.
He said Iran did not intend to seize foreign territory, but “to protect our national achievements and interests, we may adopt an offensive approach.”
Also Sunday, the commander of the Iranian Army’s Ground Forces, Brig. Gen. Kiumars Heidari, said his troops had transformed into a “forward-moving and offensive” force.
“To protect Iran, the armed forces no longer need asymmetric approaches, and we are at a stage where we can defend our homeland… by using good offensive approaches,” he said, according to Press TV.
The announcements by top Iranian brass comes days after the Islamic Republic held its annual infantry drill, involving some 12,000 troops, fighter jets, armored vehicles and drones.
The exercise, which Iranian officials called “war games,” involved newly developed rapid redeployment units, and focused on combat against enemies and armed militants, Reuters reported on Thursday.
General Heidari told state TV last week the exercise exemplified Iran’s military capabilities, and demonstrated to its enemies that they would be dealt a “rapid and crushing blow” if they attacked the Islamic Republic, Reuters reported.
Iran regularly holds exercises to display its military preparedness and has vowed to respond strongly to any attack by Israel or the United States, both of which view it as a regional menace.
Source: Iran: We won’t negotiate over our missile program – Arab-Israeli Conflict – Jerusalem Post
IRGC Commander warns Israel over any military action against Iran, says Israel won’t have a cemetery left to bury corpses.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Bahram Qassemi stressed on Monday that the country would never negotiate over its missile program, saying that the country will continue to boost its deterrence power “to protect national security.”
“Our policy on missiles is clear and the issue as part of our country’s defense sector cannot be negotiated,” he was quoted as saying by Iran’s Tasnim news agency.
Qassemi also denied holding secret talks with France over the Islamic Republic’s controversial ballistic missile program after French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said it was ready to impose more sanctions if there was no progress in talks over the program.
Le Drian was quoted as saying on Friday that “we have begun a difficult dialogue with Iran… and unless progress is made we are ready to apply sanctions, firmly, and they know it.” He also demanded that Iran change its behavior in the region, specifically in Syria.
Despite new US sanctions placed on Iran meant to pressure Tehran over its military activity in the Middle East and its ballistic missile program, Tehran is continuing to improve its missile arsenal, defending the program as being purely defensive.
“There have been no talks, whether secret or not secret, about our missile program with France or any other country,” Qassemi said. “Our missile program is a defensive program that we only discuss inside the country. I cannot confirm holding any secret talks with France over our missile program.”
The Islamic Republic possesses over 1,000 short- and medium-range ballistic missiles and has the ability to proliferate weapons to countries and non-state actors such as Hezbollah on Israel’s northern border and Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
Israel is concerned that Iran is not only trying to consolidate its grip in Syria where it could establish a forward base to attack Israel, but that it is trying to build advanced weapons factories in Syria and Lebanon in order to manufacture GPS-guided missiles that could hit targets with greater accuracy.
Israel has reiterated its view several times that any transfer of advanced weaponry to Hezbollah as a “red line,” and it will work to prevent any such movement.
Earlier on Monday, a commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) said that the country’s strategy was to wipe “the Zionist regime” off of the political map.
“We announce that if Israel takes any action to wage a war against us, it will definitely lead to its own elimination and freeing of occupied territories,” Brig.-Gen. Hossein Salami, deputy head of the IRGC, was quoted by Iran’s Mehr news agency as saying.
“Israelis won’t even have a cemetery in Palestine to bury their corpses,” he added.
Obama, Bandar Bin Sultan said, “would promise something and do the opposite.” He spoke critically of the Iran nuclear deal and how the former president spoke about curbing Iran but failed.
Barack Obama (R) laughs as he meets with King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington June 29, 2010. (photo credit: LARRY DOWNING/REUTERS)
Former US president Barack Obama lied to Saudi Arabia when violating the redlines he famously declared regarding Syria’s use of chemical weapons and then not acting when they were used, a former senior Saudi official said in an interview with Independent Arabia.
Bandar bin Sultan served for years as head of Saudi intelligence as well as the Saudi ambassador to the United States. In the interview, he recalled a last phone call between the late Saudi King Abdullah and Obama, during which the Saudi leader told the US president: “I did not expect that [after] this long life, I would see [the day] when an American president lies to me.”
“A coincidence led me to getting to (see) Soleimani face to face,” bin Sultan said. “Until then, we had [only] heard of him without seeing him.”
Source: Iran: Russia prevented Syrians from using S-300 against Israel – Israel Hayom
“There appears to be a strange type of correlation between the Zionist regime’s airstrikes and the Russian air defenses not working,” says senior Iranian lawmaker • Israeli reports of destroyed Iranian infrastructure in Syria are totally false, he adds.
|
An S-300 air defense missile system in action
| Archives: Reuters
|
A senior Iranian lawmaker on Sunday condemned the Kremlin for allegedly preventing the Syrian army from using its Russian-supplied S-300 surface-to-air missile systems against Israeli warplanes earlier this month.
Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, said the Russians had made sure to disable the advanced S-300 systems during an Israeli airstrike.
“There appears to be a strange type of correlation between the Zionist regime’s airstrikes and the Russian air defenses not working,” he said.
Falahatpisheh also said Israeli reports of destroyed Iranian infrastructure in Syria were completely false.
“The Zionists aspire to undermine the stability of the regime in Syria, with the aim of causing Iran to respond and to push into a corner,” Falahatpisheh remarked, adding that he had visited the sites bombed by Israel.
Last week, Iran’s state-run news network reported that Russian air defenses had failed to function during an Israeli airstrike on Damascus. Russia and Iran have clashed in the past over Moscow’s refusal to transfer more advanced models of the S-300 to Syria.
On Friday, Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov denied Moscow had formed an alliance with Iran in Syria and said the Kremlin was deeply committed to Israel’s security.
Source: ‘Hezbollah claims of more cross-border attack tunnels are baseless’ – Israel Hayom
Former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkot says IDF unaware of additional Hezbollah attack tunnels • PM dismisses Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s threat to strike Israel, says Operation Northern Shield has left the group “embarrassed” and “in distress.”
|
Former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkot addresses a security conference in Tel Aviv, Sunday
| Photo: Gideon Markowicz
|
Former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkot has rejected Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s assertion that the IDF had not eliminated all the terrorist group’s cross-border attack tunnels.
Speaking at the annual Institute for National Security Studies conference in Tel Aviv, Sunday, Eizenkot, said, “There is no basis for his statement that there are other tunnels we are not aware of.”
In an interview with Beirut-based Al Mayadeen TV, Saturday, Nasrallah said Israel had only discovered some of Hezbollah’s tunnels and warned that Hezbollah could “at any moment” decide to respond differently to Israel’s actions in Syria, hinting that Tel Aviv might be a target.
Eizenkot said: “We were used to hearing him [Nasrallah] once a week. We haven’t heard from him in 10 weeks. We need to view his speech against the backdrop of the timing. Hezbollah is wrapping up five years of involvement in Syria with 2,000 killed, 9,000 wounded. The [Iranian expeditionary] Quds Force has transferred a billion dollars to [Hezbollah] over the years, and the [U.S.] sanctions [on Iran] are having an impact on Hezbollah.”
According to Eizenkot, Hezbollah “wanted to send in thousands of fighters to conquer the Galilee. That’s the plan they were working on, just as Nasrallah said over a decade ago. What would the State of Israel look like if even 10% of the plan had been a success, and they wouldn’t have sent in 6,000 fighters to Israel, but just 600?”
With Operation Northern Shield to expose and neutralize cross-border terror tunnels dug by Hezbollah under the Israel-Lebanon security fence now officially behind us, Eizenkot said, “This is an opportunity for the U.N. to demand the enforcement of [Resolution] 1701 [that ended the 2006 Second Lebanon War and calls for all armed organizations to remain north of Lebanon’s Litani River] in southern Lebanon and return Lebanon to the Lebanese. The Iranians in 2015 set out a grandiose vision to establish Iranian hegemony in Syria.”
Asked by the director of the Institute for National Security Studies and former Military Intelligence head Amos Yadlin about the erosion of Israel’s policy of ambiguity, Eizenkot said, “The policy of ambiguity that we adopted was the right [policy] and it remains the right [policy] today.”
Eizenkot noted that he recently told The New York Times that Israel has carried out thousands of strikes both inside and outside of Syria over the past four years.
“What we will reveal to the Israeli public is the fighting in Gaza and Judea and Samaria. All of this vast effort [against] the Iranian entrenchment, the high-trajectory weaponry, the underground threat, the contribution to the fight against Islamic State was concealed from the Israeli public, which can only judge what it sees. And it sees what is happening down south,” he said.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also dismissed Nasrallah’s threats, saying the Iranian-backed group is “in distress” and “very embarrassed.”
Netanyahu told his cabinet on Sunday that the Hezbollah leader “broke his silence” in a televised address on Saturday because the terrorist group faced major financial pressure due to U.S. sanctions against Iran, and because of Operation Northern Shield.
Nasrallah’s address was his first public appearance since November when Israel intensified strikes against suspected Iranian arms shipments to Hezbollah in Syria. He warned Netanyahu not to continue attacking Syria, lest he “drag the region into a war or a major confrontation.”
“Nasrallah has good reasons not to want to feel the might of our arm,” Netanyahu said.
Source: The false promise of peace – Israel Hayom
Dr. Edy Cohen
On Jan. 6, the Foreign Ministry released a statement in Arabic revealing that a number of delegations from Iraq had visited Israel, including influential Sunni and Shiite figures in the country, in 2018. The Foreign Ministry did not name names.
The news made waves in Iraq after it was leaked to the press that some of the officials that took part in the delegation were sitting members of parliament. Many lawmakers, including the head of Iraq’s parliament, demanded an investigative committee be established and officials who came into contact with the “Zionist entity” be punished to the full extent of the law. Everyone in the country was outspoken about their opposition to the normalization of ties with Israel, everyone that is, except for one former lawmaker. But we’ll get to him later.
A majority of Israelis would like to be at peace with our neighbors, but decades of experience have led us to seriously contemplate the concessions we are interested in making in return for a false peace. Peace with Egypt is very cold, and peace ties with Jordan are at a rough spot following Amman’s refusal to renew part of the Hashemite kingdom’s 1994 peace treaty with Israel that allows Israel to lease two small areas of land – Naharayim in the northern Jordan Valley and Ghamr in the south.
It Is evident that our neighbors are only interested in making peace with us because they are in distress. They have learned how to acquire Israeli aid through empty promises of future peaceful relations. The examples of this are many. In the 1980s, the Christians in Lebanon sold Israel the illusion of a future peace that would be made possible once the Palestinians were removed from Lebanon. This led Israel to show up in Beirut and expel the Palestinians, among other things. The outcome of all this is of course well-known.
With the help of social media networks and mass Syrian immigration to Europe, many Israelis have been able to communicate with members of Syria’s opposition in recent years. These opposition members have expressed interest in making peace with Israel, after it helps bring down President Bashar Assad’s regime. Well, Assad hasn’t been removed from power, and there is no peace with Syria.
Immediately after the fall of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, dozens of Iraqi parliamentarians arrived in Israel, a majority of them afraid to make their visit public. The most conspicuous of them was MP Mithal al-Alusi, who did not fear public knowledge of his Israel visit. Israeli commentators saw his bold stance as proof the winds of peace were blowing from Baghdad. Except a short while later, he was kicked out of parliament and his two children were murdered. Al-Alusi was never again elected to parliament. He wasn’t able to pass the electoral threshold.
Iraq is a failed state. Despite being one of the richest countries when it comes to natural resources, it is unable to provide its residents with electricity and drinking water. Iraqis are sick of living such lives. They are sick of standing idly by as their oil and other natural treasures are stolen by Iran, which has controlled Iraq through Shiite militias ever since Hussein’s fall from power. The Iraqis, who are interested in freeing themselves of the Iranians at any price, are now asking for Israel’s military assistance in return for empty promises of peace. Unfortunately, Israel is allocating substantial resources toward this hopeless end.
There are tens of thousands of Iraqi refugees in Europe who cannot return to their homeland. They hope Israel will help remove the Iranians from Iraq, and promise us peace when they return home and take control of the government. And so, let us add Iraq to the list of Arab countries that seek Israeli aid in return for promises of a future peace, and pay us the same kind of lip service we were paid by the Christians in Lebanon in the 1980s, and most recently with the opposition fighters in Syria.
Peace with Iraq is light years away. In October 2017, the Iraqi parliament passed a law prohibiting the raising of the Israeli flag in the country and punishing violators with jail time. If we haven’t learned from past experiences, let us at the very least read the present situation correctly.
Source: Iran, Hizballah, Hamas use threats of escalation to meddle in Israel’s election – DEBKAfile
On Monday, Jan. 28, the Palestinian extremist Hamas released photos of bulldozers clearing the ground along the Gaza-Israeli border to prepare for more of the mass riots that have plagued Israeli border forces for ten months. Its spokesmen moreover announced preparations to renew the incendiary balloon and glider attacks against Israeli border communities, as well as keeping up terrorist gang attempts to smash through the border.
By this tactic, Hamas sought to show up as wasted effort Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s deal for channeling Qatar’s Gaza funding to humanitarian needs rather than the Hamas payroll. The Palestinian terrorists had managed to outmaneuver this deal. Hamas now controls the Qatari allocations, while retaining the option for escalating its cross-border attacks, in breach of its ceasefire bargain with Qatar. Indeed, there is nothing to stop Hamas from reverting to rocket attacks at any time it chooses. Hamas therefore holds a strong lever for disrupting the Likud and Netanyahu’s campaign for re-election by exercising its initiative for generating violence.
Hizballah chief Hassan Nasrallah also laid claim to this lever when on Saturday, Jan. 26 he finally broke his silence over Israel’s November operation to destroy his cross-border tunnels. The Israeli minister Yuval Steinitz described Nasrallah as pale and faltering in this appearance and ex-chief of staff Gady Eisenkot insisted that every last tunnel had been destroyed or blocked.
But the fact remains that the IDF cannot know absolutely that there are no tunnels left. And, moreover, there was no Israeli response to the key element in the Hizballah chief’s long harangue: an explicit threat to use his new precise missiles, stressing that he has enough of them, if he so decides, to strike every target in Israel. Nasrallah went on to arrogantly confirmed as true the allegations by Netanyahu and Eisenkot. that Hizballah had a scheme for capturing parts of Galilee.
Tehran is also aware that Netanyahu and his party are fighting an election and is checking to see if threats can do some damage. On Sunday, Maj. Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, IRGC commander and Chief of Staff of Iran’s Armed Forces, threatened to switch from its “defense policy to offensive tactics” if its national interests came under threat. “We will attack first if we feel or see evidence that Iran may be under attack,” he said.
An effort to spark a major headline-grabbing outbreaks to coincide with the election campaign was staged on Saturday in another combustible sector: Judea and Samaria. It led to a Palestinian death in the village of Mughayyer near Ramallah, which is also next door to the Israeli outpost of Adel Ad. The two clashed after an attempt to ambush of a settler. He survived what he was sure was a Palestinian kidnapping attempt with a stabbed arm and injuries from blows. A police probe seeks to establish who fired the fatal shot after the incident descended into mob violence.
Recent Comments