Archive for September 26, 2014

KRAUTHAMMER: A real Syria strategy

September 26, 2014

KRAUTHAMMER: A real Syria strategy – Odessa American: Opinion Columnist.

Charles Krauthammer | Posted: Friday, September 26, 2014 5:00 am

WASHINGTON Late, hesitant and reluctant as he is, President Obama has begun effecting a workable strategy against the Islamic State. True, he’s been driven there by public opinion. Does anyone imagine that without the broadcast beheadings we’d be doing anything more than pinprick strikes within Iraq? If Obama can remain steady through future fluctuations in public opinion, his strategy might succeed.

But success will not be what he’s articulating publicly. The strategy will not destroy the Islamic State. It’s more containment-plus: Expel the Islamic State from Iraq, contain it in Syria. Because you can’t win from the air. In Iraq, we have potential ground allies. In Syria, we don’t.

 The order of battle in Iraq is straightforward. The Kurds will fight, but not far beyond their own territory.

 A vigorous air campaign could help them recover territory lost to the Islamic State and perhaps a bit beyond. But they won’t be anyone’s expeditionary force.

From the Shi’ites in Iraq we should expect little. U.S. advisers embedded with a few highly trained Iraqi special forces could make some progress. But we cannot count on the corrupt and demoralized regular Shi’ite-dominated military.

 Our key potential allies are the Sunni tribes. We will have to induce them to change allegiances a second time, joining us again, as they did during the 2007-2008 surge, against the jihadists.

Having abandoned them in 2011, this won’t be easy. But it is necessary. One good sign is the creation of a Sunni national guard, a descendant of the Sons of Iraq who, fighting with us, expelled al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI) during the Anbar Awakening. Only they could push the Islamic State out of Iraq. And surely only they could hold the territory regained.

Syria is another matter. Under the current strategy, the cancer will remain. The air power there is unsupported by ground troops. Nor is anyone in Obama’s “broad coalition” going to contribute any.

Perhaps Turkey will one day. But Islamist President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is not just refusing to join the air campaign. He has denied us use of his air bases.

As for what’s left of the Free Syrian Army, Obama has finally come around to training and arming it. But very late and very little. The administration admits it won’t be able to field any trained forces for a year. And even then only about 5,000. The Islamic State is already approximately 30,000 strong and growing.

Not that air power is useless. It can degrade and disrupt. If applied systematically enough it can damage the entrenched, expanding, secure and self-financing Islamic State, turning it back to more of a fugitive guerrilla force constantly on the run.

What kind of strategy is that? A compressed and more aggressive form of the George Kennan strategy of Soviet containment. Stop them, squeeze them and ultimately they will be defeated by their own contradictions.

As historian David Motadel points out, jihadist regimes stretching back two centuries have been undone by their own primitivism, barbarism, brutality — and the intense hostility thus engendered among those they rule.

That’s what just eight years ago created the Anbar Awakening that expelled AQI. Mahdi rule in Sudan in the 1880s and ’90s was no more successful. As Motadel notes, half the population died of disease, starvation or violence — and that was before the British annihilation of the Mahdi forces at Omdurman.

 Or to put it in a contemporary Middle East context, this kind of long-term combination of rollback and containment is what has carried the Israelis successfully through seven decades of terrorism arising at different times from different places proclaiming different ideologies. There is no one final stroke that ends it all. The Israelis engage, enjoy a respite, then re-engage.

With a bitter irony born of ceaseless attacks, the Israelis call it “mowing the lawn.”

They know a finality may come, but alas not in their time. They accept it, and go on living.

Obama was right and candid to say this war he’s renewed will take years.

This struggle is generational. This is not Sudan 1898. There is no Omdurman that defeats jihadism for much of a century.

Today jihadism is global, its religious and financial institutions ubiquitous and its roots deeply sunk in a world religion of more than a billion people. We are on a path — long, difficult, sober, undoubtedly painful — of long-term, low intensity rollback/containment.

Containment-plus. It’s the best of our available strategies. Obama must now demonstrate the steel to carry it through.

SHOCKING: Barack Obama’s Implied Pact With ISIS-Backed Terror Group

September 26, 2014

SHOCKING: Barack Obama’s Implied Pact With ISIS-Backed Terror Group

via SHOCKING: Barack Obama’s Implied Pact With ISIS-Backed Terror Group – UlstermanBooks.com.

 

Will this be given the attention it deserves? Many already know Barack Obama’s allegiance to the Muslim Brotherhood, but few likely are aware of a pact signed in 2013 that directly linked the Obama White House, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the ISIS-backed Egyptian terror organization known as Ansar all-Bayt.

Reader, please share this with others you know.

WARNING: GRAPHIC IMAGE

The above image is the recent work of  Ansar all-Bayt, an ISIS-backed Egyptian terror group who beheaded four men suspected of spying for Israel.

In December of 2013, the Muslim Brotherhood signed a pact with Ansar all-Bayt, a Sunni fundamentalist terror organization with direct links to al-Qaeda and is also suspected of receiving significant funding from Saudi Arabia.

The above photo was taken inside the White House in April of 2014. It shows Barack Obama meeting with Anas Altikriti, a top Washington D.C. lobbyist for the Muslim Brotherhood, whose father heads the Muslim Brotherhood in Iraq. It was shortly after this meeting that ISIS forces began pushing into Iraq.

Just prior to his now infamous 2009 speech in Cairo, whispers generated of senior adviser Valerie Jarrett’s insistence that no fewer than ten members of the Muslim Brotherhood be invited to attend the speech. This demand was largely ignored by most news agencies, but the Atlantic did provide this blurb:

Various Middle Eastern news sources report that the administration insisted that at least 10 members of the Muslim Brotherhood, the country’s chief opposition party, be allowed to attend his speech in Cairo on Thursday.

When then-head of the Muslim Brotherhood, Mohamed Morsi, was brought to power in Egypt shortly after Barack Obama came to power in the United States, the Obama government was quick to push for an expansive arms deal for the Muslim Brotherhood regime.

And then there are these more recent (and shocking) words in praise of the U.S. branch of the Muslim Brotherhood from Barack Obama himself, where the president states how Muslims have contributed to America’s “national fabric”:

As you listen to the words of praise for the Muslim Brotherhood by Barack Obama, look again at the photo of the decapitated bodies above. Those deaths were carried out by an extension of the Muslim Brotherhood.  ISIS itself is an extension of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Our own media refused to report the fact that in 2013, Egyptian lawyers  actually charged Barack Obama for crimes against humanity for his support of what they deem a brutal terrorist organization. Those lawyers are correct in their linking of the Obama administration with the current and horrific violence now spreading throughout the Middle East and if the terrorists succeed, to your own backyard as well.

 

RELATED STORY:

ISIS Crisis: “THE LIE IS BEFORE YOU, AND THE GRAVE IN FRONT OF YOU.”

US considers new, softened nuclear offer to Iran

September 26, 2014

US considers new, softened nuclear offer to Iran

Compromise being weighed would allow Tehran to keep half of its centrifuges in exchange for various checks and balances

By George Jahn September 26, 2014, 10:11 am

via US considers new, softened nuclear offer to Iran | The Times of Israel.

As expected but faster than I thought

Illustrative photo of centrifuges enriching uranium (photo credit:
US Department of Energy/Wikimedia Commons)
 

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The US is considering softening present demands that Iran gut its uranium enrichment program in favor of a new proposal that would allow Tehran to keep nearly half of the project intact while placing other constraints on its possible use as a path to nuclear weapons, diplomats told The Associated Press.

The initiative, revealed late Thursday, comes after months of nuclear negotiations between Iran and six world powers that have failed to substantially narrow differences over the future size and capacity of Tehran’s uranium enrichment program. Iran insists it does not want atomic arms but the West is only willing to lift nuclear-related sanctions if Tehran agrees to substantially shrink enrichment and other activities that Iran could turn toward making such weapons.

The US, which fears Tehran may enrich to weapons-grade level used to arm nuclear warheads, ideally wants no more than 1,500 centrifuges left operating. Iran insists it wants to use the technology only to make reactor fuel and for other peaceful purposes and insists it be allowed to run at least the present 9,400 machines.

The tentative new US offer attempts to meet the Iranians close to half way on numbers, said two diplomats who demanded anonymity because their information is confidential. They said it envisages letting Iran keep up to 4,500 centrifuges but would reduce the stock of uranium gas fed into the machines to the point where it would take more than a year of enriching to create enough material for a nuclear warhead.

That, they said, would give the international community enough lead time to react to any such attempt.

The diplomats emphasized that the proposal is only one of several being discussed by the six powers — the US, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany — and has not yet been formally submitted to the Iranians.

Other ideas also include letting Iran have more than 1,500 machines but removing or destroying much of the infrastructure needed to make them run — wiring, pipes used to feed uranium gas and other auxiliary equipment.

 

A meeting at the P5+1 talks with Iran at UN headquarters in Vienna, on July 3, 2014 (photo credit: AFP/Joe Klamar)

A meeting at the P5+1 talks with Iran at UN headquarters in Vienna,
on July 3, 2014 (photo credit: AFP/Joe Klamar)

 

Both ideas would allow the Iranians to claim that they did not compromise on vows that they would never emasculate their enrichment capabilities, while keeping intact American demands that the program be downgraded to a point where it could not be quickly turned to making bombs.

The new proposals reflect Washington’s desire to advance the talks ahead of a November 24 deadline that was extended from July. The current round began a week ago on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, leading to speculation that foreign ministers of the negotiating nations would join in the talks. But the diplomats said that was no longer planned because of the lack of substantial progress.

The fates of a reactor under construction near the city of Arak and of an underground enrichment facility at Fordo are also contentious issues. The US and its Western allies want the reactor converted to reduce to a minimum its production of plutonium, an alternate pathway to nuclear arms. And they insist that the Fordo plant be shuttered or used for something else than enrichment because it is fortified and thought to be impervious to air attacks.

Unity Government Will Rule in Gaza

September 26, 2014

Unity Government Will Rule in Gaza

Both sides with intimate knowledge of recent Cairo talks have confirmed that progress has been made on previous points of contention.

According to a Hamas spokesperson, “an official statement will be released late today.” No details were revealed concerning the terms of the agreement

Sep 25, 2014, 08:02PM | Jacob Northbrook

via Israel News – Unity Government Will Rule in Gaza – JerusalemOnline.

Abu Mazen and Khaled Mashaal, archives Reuters
 

Is this the end of the fissure in Palestinian leadership? Arab news sources have reported that major ‘headway’ had been made in talks between Fatah and Hamas regarding a potential unity government. Among other things, it was agreed that the new government would rule in Gaza.

Egypt’s intelligence agency was heavily involved in the talks between the two parties, which began yesterday. Egyptian pressure was a catalyst for the recent breakthrough.

As part of the agreement, the Palestinian Authority will take responsibility in Gaza and will be responsible for rehabilitating the strip following Operation Protective Edge. What is more, Abu Mazen’s security forces will be those to patrol the entry and exit points of the Gaza Strip. According to sources, the agreement is meant to take effect immediately.

 

Will Rafah Crossing be controlled by Fatah? Archives Reuters

The talks were initiated in the midst of Israeli negotiations with Palestinian factions regarding a ceasefire following Operation Protective Edge. The unity government was first formed in July, however many crucial issues remained unresolved. Fatah claimed that Hamas continued to exercise unbridled authority in the Gaza Strip, while Hamas countered that Fatah had failed to pay Hamas’ civil servants their salaries.

“The salaries of civil servants will be paid by the unity government,” explained a senior Fatah source. “We are all Palestinian, and the unity government will represent all Palestinians,” he explained.