Archive for September 17, 2014

This is What Happens When You Attack Israel

September 17, 2014

For too long the media and international community have been preaching that “Palestinians” bear no responsibility for the consequences of their decisions and they are passive victims of the conflict.

By: Shalom Bear
Published: September 17th, 2014

via The Jewish Press » » This is What Happens When You Attack Israel.

 

A Gaza building, reportedly used by Hamas, destroyed by the IDF on August 26, 2014.
Photo Credit: Emad Nassar/Flash90
 

Leftwing websites love to play up the photos of destruction of Gaza. The poor, suffering, innocent “Palestinians”, victims of Israeli aggression and collective punishment, are their front page stories.

Their bottom line is always the same, the Gazans (or the “Palestinians”) are not responsible for their actions and decisions; they’re passive victims of the conflict.

But it’s not true.

Even before their violent takeover of Gaza, Hamas received the largest block of votes in Gaza, giving them the majority, in fact Hamas secured 76 out of 132 seats – that’s 58% – in the Palestinian Authority’s parliament.

The people of Gaza, knowing full well the genocidal charter of Hamas, voted Hamas in. There’s no getting around that.

It’s both immoral and patronizing to say Gaza’s residents (or the Arabs in Judea and Samaria) voted Hamas in because Hamas’s social programs are more important to them than Hamas’s plans for genocide.

It is now well documented that the destruction in Gaza by the IDF was limited to areas that Hamas was using to attack Israel, whether it be for their command centers, missile silos, terror tunnels, or terrorist positions. For the most part, areas that were not involved in the fighting emerged from the war mostly unscathed.

Even within terror-infested neighborhoods, there are buildings that were hit, and buildings that weren’t.

Owners of many of the hit buildings were profiting from Hamas, charging them rent and receiving payment for letting Hamas store their weapons there, build terror tunnels entrances underneath their homes, or to set up rocket launchers in their orchards and backyards.

Unfortunately, there were also other civilian locations which Hamas illegally decided to use during the war, to attack Israel from.

The problem is that the international community refuses to report on the Arab civilian’s complicity and collusion with the terrorists, preferring to always portray them as the innocent victims, stuck in a situation out of their control.

Last week a Hamas official accidentally let it slip that Gazans are not letting Hamas back into their homes.

So much for the myth of the innocent and oppressed Gazans who can’t stand up to Hamas.

What was missing until now was any incentive for the Gazans to stand up to Hamas.

After all, the media and the UN teach them that there are absolutely no consequences to their actions – so why not let part of your house be converted into a missile silo to wipe out the Jews.

But now, the Gazans have learned an important life lesson. If you participate in any way in the genocidal attempt to destroy Israel, there are significant consequences to your actions.

The media should keep showing these photos of the destruction in Gaza.

Some day, the Gazans and the Arabs in Judea and Samaria will demand the right to vote from their leaders in the Palestinian Authority and Hamas.

They will once again need to decide whether they want the corrupt terrorists to take over, or if they want the ruthless terrorists to take over.

Unfortunately, a poll right after the war showed that Hamas was more popular than ever.

But perhaps, just perhaps, with a little retrospection, they’ll look at these pictures from Gaza and say, “We want a third option.”

Steinitz ahead of nuclear talks: Iran is Israel’s greatest threat, not ISIS or Hezbollah

September 17, 2014

Steinitz ahead of nuclear talks: Iran is Israel’s greatest threat, not ISIS or Hezbollah.

After returning from Washington, strategic affairs minister stresses that he does not see any hope in Iran making compromises.

 

Israel is deeply concerned, Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz said on Wednesday, on the eve of the new round of nuclear talks between the P5+1 group of world powers and Iran.

Steinitz, who returned over the weekend from strategic dialogue in Washington that focused largely on Iran, said that the Iranians have shown “no real flexibility.”

The positions of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and nuclear negotiator Abbas Araqhchi are no different than the positions of former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and former chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili. “The only thing that has changed is the tone,” Steinitz said.

“The Iranians continue in their insistence now as they did under Ahmadinejad, to retain most of the centrifuges and the heavy water reactor in Arak. There is no real difference.”

Steinitz said that Israel is “disturbed” and that “no deal is better than a bad deal.”

Steinitz also said that with the increased focus on the Islamic state, it is important for the international community to keep priorities correct, and “although it is important to defeat ISIS, if Iran gets nuclear weapons, it’s a different world for decades. This is the main threat to global security and should be the priority,” he relayed.

Steinitz, in apparent reference to the fact that EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who has been running the negotiations, will end her term at the end of the year, stressed that “the lack of agreement is not a failure” and that “if the P5+1 stands by its principles and commitments, its not a failure but a success.”

Asked whether he came back from Washington more or less concerned, he answered “I went concerned and I came back concerned. I didn’t hear anything that the Iranians had made concessions that gave me hope.”

Pravda: Russia to build up troops in Crimea due to growing foreign military presence

September 17, 2014

Russia to build up troops in Crimea due to growing foreign military presence

17.09.2014
Russia to build up troops in Crimea due to growing foreign military presence. 53582.jpeg

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said that due to increased foreign presence in Ukraine, “the deployment of complete and self-sufficient group of forces in the Crimean direction” has become one of Russia’s priorities.

“The military and political situation in the south-western strategic direction has changed a lot since the beginning of the year. This is largely due to the expansion of the territory of the Southern Military District after the Crimea became a part of Russia,” said the minister.

In addition, Shoigu said, the situation in Ukraine “has sharply escalated.” According to the head of the Defense Ministry, foreign military presence in the immediate vicinity of the Russian border has increased.

NATO responded to Shoigu’s statements by saying that increasing the positions of the Russian army in the Crimea would be a step to increase tension in Europe. “The increasing presence of Russian armed forces in the Crimea is a step to increase tension in Europe,” the press service of the military alliance told Itar-Tass.

The statement was made ten days after the NATO summit in the UK, where the participants of the bloc agreed to help Ukraine in the fight against militia forces in the Donbass region.

Advisor to the President of Ukraine Yury Lutsenko said later that weapons would be supplied from the United States, France, Poland, Norway, and Italy, although the authorities of those countries did not confirm the information. Nevertheless, Ukrainian Defense Minister Valery Geletey has recently announced the start of  arms shipments from abroad.

As for the “military presence,” which Sergei Shoigu mentioned, Ukrainian, Western and NATO officials have set forth similar accusations against Russia before. According to NATO officials, about 20,000 Russian soldiers were stationed near the Ukrainian border as of September 11. Representatives of the alliance noted that approximately one thousand Russian soldiers were already located on the territory of Ukraine.

The Russian authorities, in turn, refute such accusations. NATO has not been able to provide one single proof in support of its accusations against Russia.

Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov believes that the West is waging a media war against Russia with its statements of Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine. In an interview to Russia Beyond the Headlines, Mr. Lavrov stated that Russia regarded such statements as a manifestation of the information war. “Accusations of Russia’s military intervention in the conflict have been voiced before. From the very beginning of the crisis, they accuse us of practically everything, without presenting any facts ever,” said the minister.

Lavrov said that “the absence of evidence, concealment and distortion of truth is a characteristic feature of the position of the United States and several European countries.” “This goes for the statements about the movements of our troops, the investigation of the Malaysian Boeing disaster, as well as for the tragedies on Maidan, in Odessa, and many other situations,” he explained.

Noteworthy, when visiting Estonia on September 3, US President Obama announced that Russian troops entered Ukraine. According to Obama, there was evidence to prove it. The same day, President’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov rebutted Obama’s statements and said that with that such statements the West was trying to assign a destructive role on Russia. According to Peskov, such statements from Western leaders only speak of “unwillingness to operate with facts.” The undeniable evidence of Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine has never been provided, which suggests that there is no evidence at all, and the West simply prefers to publicly demonize Russia.

Sergey Lavrov, in the above-mentioned interview, also expressed his point of view regarding the sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union against Russia because of the Ukrainian crisis. According to him, the West needs to break the vicious circle of “an eye for an eye” action.

“We believe that the attempts to influence crises by unilateral measures that go beyond UN Security Council decisions and contradict to the norms and principles of international law, threaten international peace and stability,” said the minister.

The head of the Russian diplomatic mission stressed out that such measures are double-edged and often more dangerous to those who initiate them. “It is clear that the continuation of the sanctions pressure on Russia will not help resolve the internal Ukrainian crisis, but will only deepen the confrontation and complicate dialogue,” says Sergey Lavrov.

“The United States, the European Union and other countries need to finally listen to the voice of reason and interrupt the vicious cycle of pointless action based on the principle of “an eye for an eye,” which they started themseves,” said Lavrov.

In the interview, Sergei Lavrov also said that although the relations between Russia and the European Union undergo a serious test in connection with the “the destructive policy of European partners due to the Ukrainian internal crisis, the point of no return has not yet been reached.” “To return to the path of cooperation, it is necessary to overcome the vicious logic of sanctions and threats and switch to constructive and pragmatic search for solutions of accumulated problems,” the minister said.

“There is no reasonable alternative to the continuation of mutually beneficial cooperation between Russia and the EU. There are too many things that connect us in terms of geography, economy, history, in human terms,” Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said.

Pravda.Ru