Archive for September 5, 2014

Disturbing comment by Federica Mogherini “A solution for Syria should include Iran” – And this communist will be EU’s next foreign policy chief!

September 5, 2014

 

Italian Foreign Minister Federica Mogherini

 
Italian Foreign Minister Federica Mogherini
 
Fri Apr 4, 2014 5:6AM GMT

Italian Foreign Minister Federica Mogherini has underscored the need for Iran’s participation in any effort aimed at settling the crisis in Syria.

Speaking at a seminar organized by the Aspen Institute in Rome on Thursday, Mogherini said that the Syrian crisis worries her the most, as it has lingered for three years, with the humanitarian situation getting worse.

Ways should be found to involve Iran and all regional actors, the Italian foreign minister said, adding that ‘otherwise, we do not go forward.’

She further noted that the Syrian conflict should not be overshadowed by the West’s tension with Russia in the wake of Crimea’s integration into the Russian Federation.

Mogherini warned that focusing on new conflicts and forgetting about the old ones would be a historic mistake.

On March 15, the UN secretary general highlighted Iran’s role in resolving the Syrian crisis, urging Tehran to use its influence on Damascus to help revive the talks aimed at ending the conflict in the Arab country.

“Iran is one of the important regional countries who can play an important role, including impressing upon the Syrian authorities to come to the Geneva conference in a more constructive way,” Ban Ki-Moon said after an informal meeting of the UN General Assembly attended by UN-Arab League Special Representative for Syria Lakhdar Brahimi.

The second round of the talks between delegations representing the Syrian government and the foreign-backed opposition in Geneva hit a deadlock in mid-February with both sides sticking to their positions.

The Syrian delegation said fighting terrorism should be the top priority, but the opposition insisted that the formation of a transitional government and resignation of President Bashar al-Assad must come first.

Syria has been gripped by deadly violence since 2011. Some sources say over 140,000 people have been killed and millions displaced due to the violence fueled by Western-backed militants.

Iran has said that it will engage in any diplomatic efforts to bring an end to the crisis in Syria. However, due to opposition by the US and the so-called Syria opposition, Tehran has been excluded from the two rounds of international talks on the crisis.

MP/HJL/HMV

A shadow of a doubt

September 5, 2014

Israel Hayom | A shadow of a doubt.

Dror Eydar

They never let up. The geniuses who marketed the Oslo Accords as though they would make all our dreams come true; who promised in every possible media outlet that the withdrawal from Gaza and the destruction of Gush Katif would improve Israel’s security, who laughed off the sobering forecasts of rocket fire on Ashkelon and Ashdod; who actively supported an Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights in order to convince Syrian President Bashar Assad to sign a peace agreement with us, because it would improve our security, obviously.

It was those same geniuses who watched the riots in Tahrir Square and saw an “Arab Spring” involving only Facebook activists; who criticized the Israeli government for staying back and neglecting to applaud the calls for freedom and democracy at the Muslim Brotherhood demonstrations there; who could easily read on well-known sites (MEMRI, Palestinian Media Watch and more) about flagrant incitement not just among Hamas but in the Palestinian Authority as well — incitement against Israel’s right to exist; who saw with their own eyes that Hamas prefer killing Jewish children over the welfare of their own people; who learned, like we all did, of the monstrous terrorist plan to infiltrate Gaza-vicinity Israeli communities over the upcoming holidays and execute a mega-terror attack involving kidnappings and possible conquest of the area by Hamas murderers.

It is the same very smart people who are now looking around to see the Islamo-fascist madness of the Islamic State group in Iraq and Syria, and now on the outskirts of Jordan; the Nusra Front in the Syrian Golan; global jihadist groups and al-Qaida in Sinai; Hezbollah in Lebanon and Iran with its accelerated pursuit of nuclear weapons. They have all come to the realization that the United States, under President Barack Obama, has almost entirely disappeared from the leadership of the free world. (In the videos released by the Islamic State group, it is not the act of beheading that is new, it is the fact that they are not in the least afraid of the U.S. On the contrary: They are challenging the U.S. to a duel, as humiliating as that is.)

These smart people are seeing how worthless U.N. peacekeepers are as buffers or as enforcers of agreements, especially in this region. (This week, Ban Ki-moon’s troops fled from the fighters belonging to the “peaceful religion” of Islam and sought refuge in our “apartheid” state.) Unlike the dim-witted foreign media, which is not familiar with the geography of the region, these smart people know exactly how far it is from Samaria to Kfar Saba, Tel Aviv or Ben-Gurion International Airport. They know that behind the friendly grandfatherly facade that has been created for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (he’s so cute, that grandpa, whose grandson declared to the whole world that he and his family would never relinquish the demand to return to Safed), there are Hamas murderers. They know that if it weren’t for the IDF guns, the Palestinian Authority wouldn’t survive one hour, and neither would the Hashemite Kingdom in Jordan.

Despite it all, these geniuses are still talking about a Palestinian state, just a stone’s throw from Tel Aviv, which would mean the establishment of an insane Islamic caliphate within western Israel. These people claim that they are guided by morals, and that is why they are willing to risk the lives of millions of Jews in the name of their flaccid ideologies, not to mention the millions of Arabs who would be forced to spend their lives in an Islamic state where beheadings are considered entertainment.

How many lies and how much hypocrisy is the public expected to consume? Who even still believes these claims? No one but a small cult of fanatic, orthodox leftists who worship diplomatic gods that have nothing to do with any rational observation of reality. Why are the same people invited to the television and radio studios time and again even after their forecasts have been disproven over and over by reality? How can anyone seriously listen to them?

* * *

This week, I spoke to a well-known media personality who told me that for years he had voted for left-wing parties (Labor and Meretz) but the recent war in Gaza convinced him to cross over to the Right. I had a similar conversation two weeks ago with another media personality. Let’s hope that they, and others like them, will have the courage to come out of the closet. It would be an important contribution to the disillusionment of many among us who are still captivated by diplomatic fantasies. They understand that they are dealing with people at home who have trouble judging reality accurately. For example, they just heard that Israel was going to expropriate 1,000 acres of land and the doomsday prophets on the Left clamored to cry out: “a knife in Abbas’ back” (Peace Now); “now is not the time” (when was it ever the time?) and much worse.

Zionism (and before then, the Jewish Enlightenment movement in the 18th and 19th centuries) signaled the return of the Jewish people to history, from a ghost-like state to national and diplomatic resurrection. Until then, we had been swirling around in a mix of nationalities and peoples. Not living and not dead, existing nowhere, outside time and the normal rules of history, wandering, desirable for a time and then viciously expelled, constantly searching for a place to rest our feet.

Over the last 200 years, the pendulum of history changed direction from exile to redemption; from destruction to independence. The direction taken by the Jews is clear: a return to Zion — to our ancient homeland. Some parts of the world do not accept the change and wish to put the Jewish genie back into the bottle for another 2,000 years.

The war against the Jews’ return to Zion is being waged on several fronts: Consistent prevention of Jewish establishment and sovereignty in Israel, vocal opposition to Jews actively defending themselves in their land, and a growing new breed of anti-Semitism disguised as anti-Israel and anti-Zionist activism. You can’t blame them: after all, over the course of hundreds of years they had become accustomed to Jews who submissively accepted pogroms, murders and bitter religious persecution, as well as expulsions starting with Spain and ending with the gates of Auschwitz. So how dare we change the rules now and defend ourselves? We Jews must have gone crazy.

The war is also against our sovereignty in our land. The name “Palestine” for Judea/Israel is the result of a Roman ploy during the second century, meant to sever the Jews’ historic, religious and national link to their land. During the seventh century, Muslims came here and continued the destruction and expulsion of Jews. In an ironic twist of history,”Palestina” was the name given to the land of Israel, and specifically to Judea, by the Roman Emperor Hadrian after the Bar Kokhba revolt (132-135 C.E.). He chose to name it after the Philistines — a sea people who had disappeared from the region hundreds of years earlier. And if we look at the Bible, we will find that the Philistines’ main role was to prevent the tribes of Israel, and later the kings of Israel, from gaining sovereignty over the land of Israel.

The use of the term Palestine is a perpetuation of Hadrian’s plan. It is not Palestine that the Arabs of the region seek. Neither is it what the nations of the world seek. They don’t care if there is one more or one less Arab state in this world just like they don’t care that millions of Muslims have been slaughtered by other Muslims over the last ten years. It is not Palestine that they seek, but rather to erase the Jewish people from the tangible form of history. They seek to combat the Jews’ return to Zion. “The name of Israel may be no more in remembrance” (Psalms 83:5).

In the face of doubt and despair it is important to look back and see where we were only 70 years ago, and what we have achieved since. This is sure to cheer us up. “Lift up thine eyes round about, and behold: all these gather themselves together, and come to thee. As I live, saith the lord, thou shalt surely clothe thee with them all as with an ornament, and gird thyself with them, like a bride” (Isaiah 49:18). We need patience. And faith.

Syrian air bombardment of Raqqa kills at least 18 foreign ISIS fighters – Americans and Europeans

September 5, 2014

Syrian air bombardment of Raqqa kills at least 18 foreign ISIS fighters – Americans and Europeans.

Debka

At least 18 foreign ISIS fighters including Americans and Europeans were killed Thursday, Sept. 4, in a Syrian air raid of the Al Qaeda-ISIS’ northern Syrian headquarters in the Gharbiya district of Raqqa. The raid caught a number of high Al Qaeda commanders and a large group of foreign adherents assembled at the facilty.

A second group of high ISIS officers were killed or injured in another Syrian air raid over their base in Abu Kamal near the Iraqi border.
debkafile’s military and intelligence sources report that top men of the Islamist terrorist group were holding meetings at both places Thursday to coordinate IS strike plans in Syria and Iraq.  For Syria, these plans center on the Deir a-Zor and Al Qaim areas, while in Iraq, they focus on targets in the east and center of the country.

The twin Syrian air offensive coincided with the opening of the two-day NATO Summit outside the Welsh town of Newport .

The information about the two Al Qaeda meetings at Raqqa and Abu Kamal could have come from only two sources: US surveillance satellites and aircraft or Iranian agents embedded at strategic points across Syria.

Syria does not have the necessary intelligence capabilities for digging out this kind of information. Nor does its air force normally exhibit the surgical precision displayed in the two strikes on Al Qaeda bases.

It is therefore more than likely that they owed their success to the widening military and intelligence cooperation between the United State and Iran in Iraq and Syria.

President Barack Obama will have taken his seat at the NATO summit to discuss ways of fighting ISIS after word of the successful Syrian strikes was already in his pocket. While they must be credited to top-quality US aerial surveillance over Syria and Iraq, they were undoubtedly made possible by the Obama administration’s deepening military and intelligence ties with Iran.

Many of the allies present at Newport will not welcome these tidings – Britain, Germany and Australia, in particular. They deeply resent being displaced as America’s senior strategic partners by the Revolutionary Republic of Iran, after their long partnership with the US in fighting terror in Afghanistan and Iraq.

But they will find it hard to argue with success.

On Aug. 31, our military sources reveal, US and Iranian special forces fighting together, broke the 100-day IS siege of the eastern Iraqi town of Amerli, 100 km from the Iranian border, to score a major victory in their first joint military ground action.

Then, Wednesday, Sept. 3, US jets struck an IS base in the northern Iraqi town of Tal Afar, killing its commander, Abu Hajar Al-Sufi, and two lieutenants of the IS chief Abu Baker Al-Baghdadi.
While President Obama has denied having a strategy for fighting ISIS, a working mechanism appears to have been put in place to support a trilateral military offensive against al Qaeda’s Islamist State. The successful attacks in the last 24 hours were apparently made possible by this mechanism: Iranian intelligence collected US surveillance data from the Americans and passed it on to Syria for action.

Raid on the Reactor ! – YouTube

September 5, 2014

Raid on the Reactor ! – YouTube.

Operation Opera (Hebrew: אופרה‎),[1] also known as Operation Babylon,[2] was a surprise Israeli air strike carried out on 7 June 1981, that destroyed a nuclear reactor under construction 17 kilometers (10.5 miles) southeast of Baghdad, Iraq.[3][4][5] This operation was after Iran’s Operation Scorch Sword that damaged this nuclear facility months before.

In 1976, Iraq purchased an “Osiris”-class nuclear reactor from France.[6][7] While Iraq and France maintained that the reactor, named Osirak by the French, was intended for peaceful scientific research,[8] the Israelis viewed the reactor with suspicion, and said that it was designed to make nuclear weapons.[3] On 7 June 1981, a flight of Israeli Air Force F-16A fighter aircraft, with an escort of F-15As, bombed and heavily damaged the Osirak reactor.[9] Israel claimed it acted in self-defense, and that the reactor had “less than a month to go” before “it might have become critical.”[10] Ten Iraqi soldiers and one French civilian were killed.[11] The attack took place about three weeks before the elections for the Knesset.[12]

The attack was strongly criticized around the world and Israel was rebuked by the United Nations Security Council and General Assembly in two separate resolutions.[13][14] The destruction of Osirak has been cited as an example of a preventive strike in contemporary scholarship on international law.

US Foreign Policy: Keeping Nobody Happy, All The Time!

September 5, 2014

 

No one should be surprised at ISIS’ brutality because the world rewards terrorism

September 5, 2014

No one should be surprised at ISIS’ brutality because the world rewards terrorism, Jerusalem Post OpinionAlan Dershowitz, September 4, 2014

A fighter of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) stands guard at checkpoint near the city of BijiISIS fighter. (photo credit:REUTERS)

In the end, the only way to defeat terrorism is to reverse the cost-benefit calculus.  This would require an international agreement whereby every country in the world would pledge to refuse to give in to terrorists, to pay ransom to terrorists, to legitimate terrorist organizations or to treat them as morally and politically equivalent to the democracies they are fighting.  It would also require that no country release captured terrorists from custody and that they place them on trial or extradite them to a country that will.

We are doing exactly the opposite today.  World leaders, such as Jimmy Carter and Desmond Tutu, demand that we treat Hamas, which is indistinguishable in its overall brutality from ISIS, as a legitimate political organization.  The United Nations General Assembly grants statehood to a group that began as a terrorist organization and continues to honor terrorists who murdered children.  The Nobel Peace Prize Committee honors Yassir Arafat, the Godfather of terrorism, who persisted in this tactic until the day he died.  European countries pay ransom to terrorists.  Any many European nations—Italy, Germany, Great Britain and others—have freed terrorists, including mass murderers, who have returned to lives of terror.  Even Israel has engaged in prisoner exchanges with terrorist groups.

********************

The international community seems to have been caught off guard by the brutality of ISIS.  The beheading of two Americans, the murder of many Christians and Muslims, and the widespread support for these brutal killers has taken the world by surprise.  But we should have anticipated this, because for the last half century, the international community has rewarded precisely the kind of behavior by ISIS we now condemn.  In brief, terrorism has proved to be a successful tactic.  It works.  That’s why ISIS engages in it.  That’ why Al Qaeda engages in it.  That’s why Boko Haram engages in it.  That’s why the Taliban engages in it.  And that’s why Hamas engages in it. 

Compare the visibility and success of groups that employ terrorism as the main tactic for responding to their grievances, with comparably aggrieved groups that reject terrorism.  Hamas is more popular than ever among Palestinians following their kidnapping and murder of three Israeli schoolchildren, their brutal slaughter of the Fogel family, and their deployment of rockets and tunnels against civilians from civilian areas.  The same is true of Hezbollah.

Now comes ISIS which is quickly becoming the terrorist group of choice for disaffected radicals, because their brutality is now in the headlines.

Contrast these successes with the failure of the Tibetan people to achieve any progress in their quest to end an occupation even longer than the one Israel is accused of maintaining.  The world demands statehood for the Palestinians, while allowing the Kurds to remain stateless despite treaty obligations and other promises.  Why?  Is it because the Kurds have rarely engaged in terrorism, whereas the Palestinians have specialized in it since the establishment of the Palestine Liberation Organization in the early 1960s—and even before that?

Success begets emulation, and the success of terrorist organizations is spreading quickly.  No one should be surprised.

ISIS has already achieved success as a result of their brutal terrorist acts.  Millions of dollars has been paid to them as ransom for hostages.  They have used this money to recruit more members.  Now other Muslim terrorist groups want to join forces with them, because they have shown that within the world of brutal terrorism, they stand out for their unmitigated and televised brutality.

Consider the following hypothetical situation.  A new group with a serious grievance hires an immoral or amoral consulting firm to advise them on the most effective tactic for achieving their goals.  Such a consulting group might well recommend that they emulate Hamas, ISIS, Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups, rather than the Tibetans or Kurds.  This advice would of course be immoral but it would be truthful as a matter of simple cost-benefit analysis.

In the end, the only way to defeat terrorism is to reverse the cost-benefit calculus.  This would require an international agreement whereby every country in the world would pledge to refuse to give in to terrorists, to pay ransom to terrorists, to legitimate terrorist organizations or to treat them as morally and politically equivalent to the democracies they are fighting.  It would also require that no country release captured terrorists from custody and that they place them on trial or extradite them to a country that will.

We are doing exactly the opposite today.  World leaders, such as Jimmy Carter and Desmond Tutu, demand that we treat Hamas, which is indistinguishable in its overall brutality from ISIS, as a legitimate political organization.  The United Nations General Assembly grants statehood to a group that began as a terrorist organization and continues to honor terrorists who murdered children.  The Nobel Peace Prize Committee honors Yassir Arafat, the Godfather of terrorism, who persisted in this tactic until the day he died.  European countries pay ransom to terrorists.  Any many European nations—Italy, Germany, Great Britain and others—have freed terrorists, including mass murderers, who have returned to lives of terror.  Even Israel has engaged in prisoner exchanges with terrorist groups.

It is one thing to negotiate—directly or indirectly—with terrorists who hold innocent people as hostages.  Such negotiation may be a necessary evil.  Democratic nations are sometimes forced to negotiate with the Mafia, the Ku Klux Klan and other criminal gangs.  But we should never honor or legitimate them, as we have done with Palestinian terrorists.  Nor should the world condemn and place on trial democracies that fight against terrorist organizations which use their own civilians as human shields.  The current misguided approach to terrorism is a prescription for emulation and repetition of terrorism as the tactic of choice.

So let’s not be surprised when a group like ISIS learns the tragic lesson of history and emulates success and visibility rather than failure and invisibility.  ISIS is doing exactly what the immoral consulting firm would advise it to do.  So we shouldn’t be surprised.  Instead we should reverse course and develop responses to terrorism that never allow this tactic to succeed.  Terrorists must never be allowed to win, as they are, unfortunately, doing today.