Archive for August 12, 2014

Iraq crisis: ‘It is death valley. Up to 70 per cent of them are dead’

August 12, 2014

Iraq crisis: ‘It is death valley. Up to 70 per cent of them are dead’On board Iraqi army helicopter delivering aid to the trapped Yazidis, Jonathan Krohn sees a hellish sight

via Iraq crisis: ‘It is death valley. Up to 70 per cent of them are dead’ – Telegraph.

 

Mount Sinjar stinks of death. The few Yazidis who have managed to escape its clutches can tell you why. “Dogs were eating the bodies of the dead,” said Haji Khedev Haydev, 65, who ran through the lines of Islamic State jihadists surrounding it.

On Sunday night, I became the first western journalist to reach the mountains where tens of thousands of Yazidis, a previously obscure Middle Eastern sect, have been taking refuge from the Islamic State forces that seized their largest town, Sinjar.

I was on board an Iraqi Army helicopter, and watched as hundreds of refugees ran towards it to receive one of the few deliveries of aid to make it to the mountain. The helicopter dropped water and food from its open gun bays to them as they waited below. General Ahmed Ithwany, who led the mission, told me: “It is death valley. Up to 70 per cent of them are dead.”

Two American aid flights have also made it to the mountain, where they have dropped off more than 36,000 meals and 7,000 gallons of drinking water to help the refugees, and last night two RAF C-130 transport planes were also on the way.

However, Iraqi officials said that much of the US aid had been “useless” because it was dropped from 15,000ft without parachutes and exploded on impact.

Handfuls of refugees have managed to escape on the helicopters but many are being left behind because the craft are unable to land on the rocky mountainside. There, they face thirst and starvation, as well as the crippling heat of midsummer.

Hundreds, if not more, have already died, including scores of children. A Yazidi Iraqi MP, Vian Dakhil, told reporters in Baghdad:

“We have one or two days left to help these people. After that they will start dying en masse.”

The Iraqi Army is running several aid missions every day, bringing supplies including water, flour, bread and shoes.

The helicopter flights aim to airlift out refugees on each flight, but the mountains are sometimes too rocky to land on, meaning they return empty.

Even when it can land, the single helicopter can take just over a dozen refugees at a time, and then only from the highest point of the mountain where it is out of range of jihadist missiles. Barely 100 have been rescued in this way.

 

Displaced Yazidi people rush towards an aid helicopter (RUDAW)
 

The flights have also dropped off at least 50 armed Peshmerga, Kurdish forces, on the mountain, according to Captain Ahmed Jabar.

Other refugees have made their way through Islamic State lines, evading the jihadists to reach safety, or travelling through

Kurdish-controlled sections of Syria to reach the town of Dohuk. So far the Yazidi refugees left behind have survived by hiding in old cave dwellings, drinking from natural springs and hunting small animals, but with families scattered across Mount Sinjar, a barren range stretching for around 35 miles near the border with Syria, there are fears aid will not reach them all unless the humanitarian relief operation is significantly stepped up .

Hundreds can now be seen making their way slowly across its expanse, carrying what few possessions they managed to flee with on their backs. Exhausted children lie listlessly in the arms of their parents, older ones trudging disconsolately alongside while the sun beats down overhead.

The small amount of relief the peshmerga militia can bring up into the mountain is not simply enough.

One pershmerga fighter, Faisal Elas Hasso, 40, said: “To be honest, there’s not enough for everyone,” he said. “It’s five people to one bottle.”

The refugees who made it out described desperate scenes as they awaited help from the outside world.

“There were about 200 of us, and about 20 of that number have died,” said Saydo Haji, 28. “We can live for two days, not more.”

Emad Edo, 27, who was rescued in an airlift on Friday at the mountain’s highest point explains how he had to leave his niece, who barely had enough strength to keep her eyes open, to her fate.

“She was about to die, so we left her there and she died,” he said.

Others shared similar stories. “Even the caves smell very bad,” Mr Edo added. According to several of the airlifted refugees, the Geliaji cave alone has become home to 50 dead bodies.

Saydo Kuti Naner, 35, who was one of 13 Yazidis who snuck through Islamic State lines on Thursday morning, said he travelled through Kurdish-controlled Syria to get to Kurdistan.

He left behind his mother and father, too old to make the rough trip, as well as 200 sheep. “We got lucky,” he said. “A girl was running [with us] and she got shot.” He added that this gave enough cover for the rest of them to get away.

Mikey Hassan said he, his two brothers and their families fled up into Mount Sinjar and then managed to escape to the Kurdish city of Dohuk after two days, by shooting their way past the jihadists. Mr Hassan said he and his family went for 17 hours with no food before getting their hands on some bread.

The Yazidis, an ethnically Kurdish community that has kept its religion alive for centuries in the face of persecution, are at particular threat from the Islamists, who regard them as ‘devil worshippers’, and drove them from their homes as the peshmerga fighters withdrew.

There have been repeated stories that the jihadists have seized hundreds of Yazidi women and are holding them in Mosul, either in schools or the prison. These cannot be confirmed, though they are widely believed and several Yazidi refugees said they had been unable to contact Yazidi women relatives who were living behind Islamic State lines.

Kamil Amin, of the Iraqi human rights ministry, said: “We think that the terrorists by now consider them slaves and they have vicious plans for them.”

Tens of thousands of Christians have also been forced to flee in the face of the advancing IS fighters, many cramming the roads east and north to Erbil and Dohuk. On Thursday alone, up to 100,000 Iraqi Christians fled their homes in the Plain of Ninevah around Mosul.

 

Refugees said the American air strikes on IS positions outside Erbil were too little, too late. They said they felt abandoned by everyone – the central government in Baghdad, the Americans and British, who invaded in 2003, and now the Kurds, who had promised to protect them.

“When the Americans withdrew from Iraq they didn’t protect the Christians,” said Jenan Yousef, an Assyrian Catholic who fled Qaraqosh, Iraq’s largest Christian town, in the early hours of

Thursday. “The Christians became the scapegoats. Everyone has been killing us.”

The situation in Sinjar has irreparably damaged the notion of home for the Yazidis. For a large portion of them, the unique culture of the area will never return, and they will therefore have nothing to go back for.

“We can’t go back to Sinjar mountain because Sinjar is surrounded by Arabs,” said Aydo Khudida Qasim, 34, who said that Sunni Arab villagers around Sinjar helped Islamic State take the area. Now he as well as many of his friends and relatives want to get out of Iraq

altogether. “We want to be refugees in other countries, not our own,” he said.

*Additional reporting by Richard Spencer, Erbil

Bennett: Salary transfer to Hamas is calm for money to terrorism

August 12, 2014

Bennett: Salary transfer to Hamas is calm for money to terrorism

Senior minister slams agreement taking shape in Cairo, calling it a ‘dangerous euphemism’; ‘It’s a diplomatic protection: Pay us – we’ll shoot at your later, don’t pay us – we’ll shoot at you now,’ Bennett says.

Roi KaisLatest Update: 08.12.14, 16:10 / Israel News

via Bennett: Salary transfer to Hamas is calm for money to terrorism – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Economy Minister and member of the Security Cabinet, Naftali Bennett, has gone on the offensive on Tuesday against an agreement taking shape in Cairo with the Palestinian factions, the details of which were published for the first time on Ynet on Monday night.

Details of an agreement obtained by Ynet show Israel has agreed to ease the blockade on Gaza, but not lift it entirely. In contrast, there is no agreement to demilitarize Gaza, as demanded by Israel.

Ynet has learned that Israel will agree to transfer the Hamas government salaries through a third party – facilitating the payment of Hamas officials’ salaries. It was further agreed that Israel would gradually expand the fishing area off the Gaza coast, initially expected to be six nautical miles. It was also decided that construction materials will enter Gaza under close supervision.

Bennett called the expected salary transfer “a dangerous euphemism. It’s a diplomatic protection: Pay us – we’ll shoot at your later, don’t pay us – we’ll shoot at you now.”

Bennett said that if this proposal goes to a vote in the cabinet, he will work with all of the tools at his disposal to convince the other ministers to reject it.

“The money will be transferred to the terrorists who are digging under our feet, to the rocket manufacturers, and to those who shoot at us. It’s very simple. It’s a ‘calm for money to terrorism’ formula,” he said.

The economy minister claimed this would “both leave the state of Israel with the continuation of Hamas’ strengthening, and harm our deterrence.”

“You can’t fight Hamas with one hand, and fund it with the other. The claim the money won’t go to terrorism when you give it to Hamas is false, to say the least, and this is exactly why Hamas is insisting on getting this funding,” he added.

Another issue close to agreement is that Israel will double the number of trucks entering Gaza through the Kerem Shalom crossing to approximately 600 trucks per day. Similarly, a decision by Israel to increase the monthly quota of permits for entry into the Gaza Strip through the Erez crossing is also close to being finalized. At the same time, criteria for entry into Israel from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank will be broadened.

A member of the Palestinian delegation told a Islamic-Jihad affiliated news site on Tuesday that a long-term ceasefire agreement could be reached by Wednesday.

The source claimed the agreement would include the lifting of the Gaza blockade, but failed to provide any details on that.

Islamic Jihad spokesman Yusef al-Hasayina told the site the Palestinian delegation is halfway through discussions on the major issues on the table.

“The Egyptian side has agreed to significant easing on the Rafah border crossing. There’s great determination among the Palestinian delegation to reach a real agreement that will bring to the end of the aggression and removal of the siege. Things in the Cairo talks will become clearer during the next 24 hours,” al-Hasayina said.

An Israeli official, on the other hand, was quoted by the media on Tuesday morning as saying no progress has been made in the talks.

“The gaps between the sides are big and there is no progress in the negotiations,” said an Israeli official, who declined to be named. There was no immediate comment from Hamas, the Islamist group that dominates Gaza.

A Palestinian official with knowledge of the Cairo talks told Reuters, on condition of anonymity: “So far we can’t say a breakthrough has been achieved … Twenty-four hours and we shall see whether we have an agreement.”

In the negotiations held Monday, the parties did not reach an understanding regarding the Gaza ports. Hamas sources in the Gaza Strip said Monday evening that it would be possible to delay in dealing with the airport and seaport if Israel agrees to the rest of their requirements. The sources noted that such a situation would still require an agreement in principle for the establishment of the ports.

Attila Somfalvi and Reuters contributed to this report.

Hamas Says Truce Would Only Be to Plan Next War

August 12, 2014

Hamas Clarifies Truce Would Only Be to Plan Next War

Hamas leadership in Gaza and Qatar reportedly divided over continuing terror war or stopping to ‘plan next campaign.

‘By Ari YasharFirst Publish: 8/12/2014, 3:55 PM

via Hamas Says Truce Would Only Be to Plan Next War – Defense/Security – News – Arutz Sheva.

 

Hamas Al-Qassam Brigades terrorist Reuters
 

Even as Israeli representatives are in Cairo to discuss a truce with Hamas on Tuesday, the terrorist group is taking pains to clarify it has no intentions of desisting from trying to wipe Israel off the map.

Hamas’s “military wing,” the Al-Qassam Brigades, released a statement presenting its position on the ongoing talks in Egypt.

“The warriors in Gaza are waiting with Allah’s help to renew the fighting, or to return to planning the next campaign. There’s no escape. Either jihad or planning (for the next jihad),” declared the statement.

The remarks leave no doubts that even in the case of a truce, from Hamas’s perspective the lull in fighting would only be an opportunity to rearm for the next terror war on the Jewish state. This facet is particularly concerning in light of reports of Israel agreeing to finance Hamas’s officials in Gaza as part of an agreement.

Slamming this proposal, Economics Minister Naftali Bennett (Jewish Home) stated Monday “this is political protection money: you pay us, then we’ll shoot you later; you don’t pay us, then we’ll shoot you right now. …It is impossible to fight our enemy with one hand and to fund it with the other.”

Further demonstrating how Hamas appears to view the talks as a chance for financial gains and to prepare for the next round of fighting is analysis suggesting that Hamas agreed to the current 72-hour ceasefire, which began on Sunday night at 12 a.m., as a means to gain Saudi and UAE funds.

Hamas divided over ending or continuing the war

Azzam al-Ahmed, the head of the Palestinian Authority (PA) delegation in Cairo for the truce talks, told Walla! on Tuesday that the talks are advancing, but “the gaps are still wide.”

The PA official, who represented Fatah in the Hamas unity deal in April and led negotiations in forming the unity government, insisted that Hamas’s period of controlling Gaza is over, and called for Israel to concede to Hamas demands for a sea and airport while supporting the PA in taking control of the Hamas enclave.

Another senior official from the PA delegation told Walla! that there are estimations that the current ceasefire may be extended by an additional 72-hour period.

Revealing Hamas’s position on the talks, the official commented “I’m still not sure that there’s a decision by Hamas to end this war.”

“There’s a great disagreement now between the Hamas leadership in Qatar headed by Khaled Mashaal, and between the senior members of the organization in Gaza. Doha (Qatar’s capital – ed.) is urging Mashaal all the time not to agree to Egypt as an intermediary,” disclosed the official.

The Gaza branch of Hamas also seems to hold enmity towards Egypt; just this week a senior Hamas leader, Mustafa Sawaf, urged the Palestinian Arab negotiating team to reject Egypt as an intermediary and find another third-party country to help Hamas realize its demands.

Liberman to ‘Post’: First get rid of Hamas, then hold PA elections, then pursue regional accord

August 12, 2014

Liberman to ‘Post’: First get rid of Hamas, then hold PA elections, then pursue regional accord

By HERB KEINONLAST UPDATED: 08/12/2014 15:34

As long as Hamas is strong on the ground, controls Gaza, and is popular in Judea and Samaria, a diplomatic process is simply impossible,” foreign minister says.

via Liberman to ‘Post’: First get rid of Hamas, then hold PA elections, then pursue regional accord | JPost | Israel News.

 

Avigdor Liberman Photo: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST
 

Getting rid of Hamas is a necessary condition for any wider diplomatic breakthrough, Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman told The Jerusalem Post in an interview on Tuesday.

“In order to make a diplomatic process possible, we have to get rid of Hamas,” he said. “As long as Hamas is strong on the ground, controls Gaza, and is popular in Judea and Samaria, a diplomatic process is simply impossible.”

Liberman’s comments came following skeletal diplomatic plans presented recently by two of his colleagues on the eight-person security cabinet: Justice Minister Tzipi Livni and Finance Minister Yair Lapid. Each of those plans leaned heavily on the Palestinian Authority, with Livni calling for a renewal of negotiations with the PLO (of which the PA is an organ), and Lapid calling for an international conference.

The foreign minister, during the interview conducted in his Jerusalem office, said it would be a mistake to build any process right now based on PA President Mahmoud Abbas.

“Abu Mazen’s [Abbas’s]legitimacy does not exist,” he said. “After we get rid of Hamas, the next stage is elections… We have to sign an international agreement with somebody with whom there is no doubt whether he has the authority to sign an agreement with us.”

Abbas does not have that legitimacy or authority, because there has not been an election in the PA since 2006, Liberman said.

“First topple Hamas, then elections, then a diplomatic process,” he said.

But the diplomatic process Liberman envisions is not a return to Oslo-style separate negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. Rather, he envisions something much larger, which he termed a “regional comprehensive solution.”

“It is important to emphasize that our conflict is not a conflict with the Palestinians. Therefore, all the attempts to solve the conflict with the Palestinians failed,” he said.

The failure on the Palestinian track time after time was because of a faulty diagnosis, he stressed.

Israel’s conflict is not with the Palestinians, but rather with the Arab world, and has three dimensions: the Arab countries, the Palestinians, and the “split identity” of the Israeli Arabs, Liberman said. What was needed was one package that would solve – or as he said, “arrange” – Israel’s “relations with all three dimensions at one time.”

“This is the only way it will work,” he said. “The Palestinians alone do not have the critical mass to finish a deal with Israel that will demand many difficult decisions. If they do not feel that the Arab world is with them, they will not do it.”

In a departure from his position in the past, Liberman said the 2002 Saudi initiative could form a “basis” for arranging Israel’s relations with the Arab world, as long as it does not include any reference to a Palestinian right of refugee return.

“I think the Saudi initiative is much more relevant today than it was previously,” he said, adding that the central idea behind the initiative was not only an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, but also an arrangement with the entire Arab world.

Asked what has changed to make him more amenable to the Saudi initiative, the foreign minister said there was a greater commonality of interests than there was a decade ago between Israel and the moderate Arab world.

Liberman pointed out that at the summit in Riyadh in March between US President Barack Obama and Saudi King Abdullah, the Saudi monarch – according to media reports – raised three issues: Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the spillover effect of the conflict in Syria on the region.

“These are exactly the three problems bothering us,” he said. “So where there is a commonality of interests that is clear to everyone, there is an opportunity.”

While a separate agreement with the Palestinians would only be a “headache” for Israel, since there would be constant demands and friction over issues such as border crossings and taxes, there would be benefits in a wider arrangement that includes ties with Saudi Arabia and the moderate states in the Persian Gulf, Liberman said. “I think they understand now that no one from the outside will solve the problems of the Middle East,” he said.

He stressed that such an arrangement would have to include arrangements regarding the Israeli Arabs, and that he would insist on redrawing borders to transfer land and populations.

“When talking about [land] swaps, the [Arab] Triangle [east of Kfar Saba] needs to be part of a future Palestinian state,” he said, restating a position he has long advocated.

Liberman said he could not countenance a situation whereby Israeli citizens hold a sympathy strike with Hamas in Gaza during a time of war, while Israelis – both Jews and Muslims – were being killed by Hamas.

“From my perspective, those who identify with Hamas during a time of war should not be Israeli citizens,” he said, adding that the “dividing line” was not whether one was Jewish, Christian or Muslim, but rather whether one was loyal to the state, its symbols and values.

Studies were under way to check the feasibility of his ideas, Liberman said. An international conference would be the last stage of this “regional comprehensive solution,” and numerous understandings would have to be drawn up beforehand, he said.

Liberman said the commonality of interests he spoke of was not only recognized by governments, but was trickling down to the people as well.

“In order to understand what is happening in the Arab world, to see the difference in the Arab world, turn on Al Jazeera and Al-Arabiya to see how things are broadcast,” he said. “ It is like night and day.

While he characterized the Qatar-backed Al Jazeera as a “brainwashing tool” for global terrorist movements, he said the Saudi-supported Al-Arabiya “understands that the central problem is the Muslim Brotherhood, and that the suffering in Gaza is not because of Israel, but because of Hamas.”

While extremely critical of the role Qatar is playing by funding terrorist groups not only in the Middle East, but also in Africa, Asia and even Europe, he did not exaggerate the leverage the country has over Hamas.

Qatar was hosting Hamas and other terrorist organizations in Doha, and funding them handsomely, to ensure that they only operate outside Qatar, the foreign minister said. He characterized this as Qatar paying “protection money” to the terrorist organization.

“It is paying protection money in order to ensure security and quiet and calm inside Qatar, so they would work only outside,” he said. “I don’t know how much they are able to influence Hamas. I think Hamas has more influence on Qatar, than Qatar does on Hamas.”

Liberman was not optimistic about the outcome of the cease-fire talks being held in Cairo, saying that Hamas’s minimum demands were much more than Israel could give – in both the short and long terms. In the short term, he said, Hamas will stymie Israel’s demands for disarmament of Gaza, and also the introduction of any effective supervisory mechanism to ensure that money and construction materials pouring into the Strip after the conflict will not be diverted for Hamas’s use.

Furthermore, certain long-term goals of Hamas – such as a sea port – are things that Israel could never agree to.

“Hamas’s ultimate demand for a sea port is designed to bypass all the supervisory mechanisms we want to set up,” Liberman noted. “It is clear that the whole idea of a sea port is to smuggle in weapons, construction materials, terrorists and advisers from Iran and other places.”

Regarding the composition of the UN Human Rights Council commission named to investigate the Gaza operation, Liberman would not say whether Israel would cooperate with the probe, saying “We don’t have to say what we are going to do.”

He did, however, blast the appointment to the panel of Canadian professor William Schabas, whom he said not only thinks that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu – but also former president Shimon Peres – needed to face charges at the International Criminal Court.

Considering Schabas’s record, Liberman said, he was surprised the UNHRC did not appoint Hamas head Khaled Mashaal to lead the inquiry, since their ideas about Israel are “more or less the same.”

On another issue, Liberman – when asked what he meant recently when he said that Israel would respond to Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s anti-Semitic comments if they continued after Sunday’s presidential elections – said that while Israel was not looking for any conflict or friction with anyone, “we cannot accept a situation where we are someone’s punching bag.”

“We are trying to preserve correct ties with Turkey,” Liberman said. “We have no interest in creating a conflict.”

He pointed out that trade with Turkey has increased over the past few years, and that the Foreign Ministry approved recent requests from Ankara to send drugs and humanitarian aid to Gaza, as well as to fly injured Palestinians to Turkey for medical treatment.

Bennett: Giving Hamas money in exchange for quiet is ‘political extortion’

August 12, 2014

Bennett: Giving Hamas money in exchange for quiet is ‘political extortion

‘By JPOST.COM STAFF 08/12/2014 14:08

Bennett says money given to pay salaries to Hamas employees will be used to fund more tunnels, rockets and terror; MKs say any deal must include return of bodies of IDF soldiers killed in Gaza.

via Bennett: Giving Hamas money in exchange for quiet is ‘political extortion’ | JPost | Israel News.

 

Naftali Bennett Photo: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST
 

As reports emerged Tuesday of a possible deal being crafted between Israeli and Palestinian negotiators to end more than a month of hostilities on the Gaza front, right-wing politicians began speaking out against making concessions to Hamas.

Economy Minister Naftali Bennett (Bayit Yehudi) addressed reports that Israel was considering agreeing to a Hamas demand to pay the back salaries of thousands of its employees in Gaza. “The ‘money for Hamas in exchange for quiet’ formula is political extortion,” he wrote on his Facebook page.

“Let’s tell the truth: the money will go to terrorists who are digging [tunnels] beneath us, to those producing missiles and to the people shooting at us,” the minister warned.

Bennett argued that the Hamas “extortionists,” were essentially saying, “Pay us, and we will shoot at you later; don’t pay us, and we will shoot at you now.”

He said that the “money to terrorists in exchange for quiet” formula would allow Hamas to recuperate after Operation Protective Edge and rearm itself for the next round of fighting.

“We can’t fight Hamas with one hand and fund them with the other,” he argued.

Bennett said that he was fighting to prevent Israel from agreeing to such cease-fire terms in the security cabinet’s discussions of the issues and he called on the other government ministers to do the same.

“You don’t pay Hamas, you defeat them,” he stated.

Deputy Transportation Minister Tzipi Hotovely (Likud) said that the emerging truce deal would “cancel out all the achievements of Operation Protective Edge and turn Hamas into the victor.”

She said that rather than give Hamas more benefits, Israel should worsen conditions in Gaza immediately. Hotovely called for Israel to halt shipments of goods to Gaza and to stop supplying electricity to the Strip.

Likud MK Miri Regev said that any cease-fire deal would have to require Hamas to return the bodies of St.-Sgt. Oron Shaul and Lt. Hadar Goldin, the two IDF soldiers killed in Gaza whose place of burial remains unknown. She said that an agreement would also have to include the understanding that Hamas will be held responsible for all rocket fire from Gaza and expect a heavier response from Israel to the fire.

Bayit Yehudi MK Orit Struck said that Israel “must staunchly oppose any deal that allows for money and building materials to enter Gaza without tight supervision that will completely prevent the development of new tunnels, weapons and terror.”

Struck added that Israel should not agree to allow any salaries to be paid to Hamas employees before the bodies of the IDF soldiers are returned.

Swedish politician quits after ‘Jewish pigs’ slur online

August 12, 2014

Politician quits after 'Jewish pigs' slur online

A soldier near Gaza. Photo: Tsafrir Abayov/TT

Politician quits after ‘Jewish pigs’ slur online

Published: 05 Aug 2014 11:28 GMT+02:00
Updated: 05 Aug 2014 14:28 GMT+02:00

Omar Omeirat, Social Democrat candidate for the town council of Filipstad, central Sweden, gave a speech in the town on Friday evening advocating diversity and openness.

On Saturday he sang a very different tune.

“The entire Muslim world is sitting and watching while our brothers and sisters in Palestine are slaughtered by the Jewish pigs,” Omeritat wrote on his Facebook page.

“May Allah strengthen those who defend Palestine, and be merciful towards the dead Muslims. Amen.”

His Facebook page also included a flag used by the Islamist group Isis, local paper NWT reported.

The post quickly became public knowledge, and the young politician came under fire for his choice of words.

“I called Omar about what he had written, and he said that he had watched a film where Palestinian women and children were murdered by Jews,”  Åsa Hååkman Feldt, Social Democrat spokeswoman in Filipstad, told The Local.

Omeirat quickly regretted the post, and updated his Facebook status to an apology.

“He never meant to judge people who are Jews, Christians, or anything else,” Feldt explained. “He just meant to judge Israel as a state.”

On Tuesday it was announced he would be stepping down from his position.

“I regret what I said,” Omeirat told Sveriges Television. “It was the wrong choice of words and no one should say something like that.”

Feldt confirmed that Omeirat had decided to leave politics, and said it was entirely his own choice.

“Of course we condemn his statement,” Feldt told The Local. “But it is Omar himself who has decided that he should take the consequences for his actions and leave the party.”

Feldt called the situation “unusual”, saying that the most common reason to step down is sickness. She explained that the town’s voting slips are already printed and that Omeirat’s name will still be on the list, but that he will not be eligible for a position in autumn elections.

“You really have to think about what you write on Facebook, especially as a politician,” Feldt added. “It’s a public record and there are consequences.”

Last month Social Democrat party leader Stefan Löfven was criticized for expressing his thoughts about Gaza, when he wrote on Facebook that “Israel has the right to defend itself”.

—-

 

Löfven: Israel has the right to defend itself

Stefan Löfven meets a member of the Jewish community to discuss anti-Semitism during a recent visit to Malmö. Erika Oldberg/TT

Löfven: Israel has the right to defend itself

Published: 13 Jul 2014 14:31 GMT+02:00
Updated: 13 Jul 2014 14:31 GMT+02:00

The election favourite posted the comment on Saturday night and within minutes he was on the receiving end of angry replies from users of the social network.

“Israel must respect international law but obviously has the right to defend itself. It is a huge tragedy that the violence escalates,” Löfven wrote.

Most of the comments were critical of the political party leader’s stance with one user posting; “Israel kills right now Palestinian children every day. Is that self-defence?”

Several other people said they had no intention in voting for Löfven in September following the remark.

Others said he was letting the Social Democrats down by not maintaining the stance of the late Olof Palme and Anna Lindh, who were critical of Israel when they were in office.

“It is fairly modest wording but that makes no difference, it is an issue where there is only room for two opinions,” political scientist Stig-Björn Ljunggren told Aftonbladet.

Löfven’s comment appears to clash with a statement released by the Social Democrats’ foreign policy spokesperson Urban Ahlin. In a press release issued on Thursday Ahlin stated that the party needed to be clear in its reaction against the Israeli bombing of Gaza.

He also condemned the Hamas rocket fire against Israel and called for a peaceful two-state solution.

“It’s very surprising (what Löfven wrote) as it differs from what the party’s foreign policy spokesperson Urban Ahlin said the other day,” Ulf Bjereld, a professor of political scientist at Gothenburg University, told Aftonbladet.

On Saturday several demonstrations were held across Sweden in protest over the Gaza bombings. A manifestation in Stockholm attracted over a 1,000 people with many carrying signs which were critical of Israel.

At the time of writing Löfven’s post has attracted more than 2,300 comments. He has yet to speak publicly on the furore surrounding his remark.

The Local/pr

Gaza ceasefire talks: Easing of blockade, but no demilitarization

August 12, 2014

Gaza ceasefire talks: Easing of blockade, but no demilitarization

Details of agreement obtained by Ynet show Hamas to receive overdue salary payments, construction materials will enter under close supervision.

Attila SomfalviPublished: 08.12.14, 00:47 / Israel News

via Gaza ceasefire talks: Easing of blockade, but no demilitarization – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Israel has agreed to ease the closure on the Gaza Strip, according to information obtained by Ynet regarding an apparent agreement between Hamas and Israel, achieved via Egyptian mediation at the negotiations currently underway in Cairo. In contrast, there is no agreement to demilitarize Gaza, as demanded by Israel.

Ynet has learned that Israel will agree to transfer the Hamas government salaries through a third party – facilitating the payment of Hamas officials’ salaries. It was further agreed that Israel would gradually expand the fishing area off the Gaza coast, initially expected to be six nautical miles. It was also decided that construction materials will enter Gaza under close supervision.

 

palestinian delegation in Cairo
 

Another issue close to agreement is that Israel will double the number of trucks entering Gaza through the Kerem Shalom crossing to approximately 600 trucks per day. Similarly, a decision by Israel to increase the monthly quota of permits for entry into the Gaza Strip through the Erez crossing is also close to being finalized. At the same time, criteria for entry into Israel from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank will be broadened.

In the negotiations held Monday, the parties did not reach an understanding regarding the Gaza ports. Hamas sources in the Gaza Strip said Monday evening that it would be possible to delay in dealing with the airport and seaport if Israel agrees to the rest of their requirements. The sources noted that such a situation would still require an agreement in principle for the establishment of the ports.

Israel is at present opposed to the establishment of air and sea ports in Gaza for fear they would be used by Hamas and other factions to smuggle weapons.

“The problem is not just the port,” said former Military Intelligence chief Major General (res.) Amos Yadlin several days ago. “If it were only the port, I think it could be stipulated that only monitored, civilian arrivals would be allowed. It would take four years to build, and Israel has already agreed in the past to a port in Gaza, during Yasser Arafat’s time.”

Regarding the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt – not a direct issue for Israel – it seems that the Egyptians and the Palestinians are moving toward handing control over to Palestinian Authority forces loyal to Mahmoud Abbas.

A source close to the Palestinian delegation in Cairo said Monday night that the talks between the Palestinian delegation and Israeli delegation had been continuously ongoing since 1 pm, with Egyptian mediation, with no set schedule. According to the source, the negotiations have been thorough and difficult, but the common denominator is that all parties are interested in reaching agreement and not returning to a further escalation of violence.

Israel’s delegation returned home Monday evening, and is expected to head back to Cairo Tuesday for further talks. The delegation includes Shin Bet chief Yoram Cohen; Defense Ministry Director of Policy and Political-Military Affairs Amos Gilad; Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s envoy Yitzhak Molcho; Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories Gen. Yoav Mordechai and Head of the IDF Planning Directorate Major General Nimrod Shefer.

No demilitarization, no port

Meanwhile, the Security Cabinet was to convene at noon Tuesday to hear the details of the agreements reached so far. A political source said that the issue of demilitarization, although it became a key talking point for Netanyahu during the fighting, was not expected to be included in the final agreement, and certainly not by Hamas.

“Hamas cannot say that it agreed to demilitarization, but the important thing is that the issue was raised,” the source said. While Israel wanted rehabilitation in return for demilitarization in Gaza, it is will likely to have to make do with making life easier for the Gazans without Hamas giving any guarantees it will decommission its weapons.

It seems that during the talks in Cairo, the demilitarization requirement was shelved along with Hamas’ demands for a seaport and airport. Cabinet ministers have made it clear that a port will be built if Hamas agrees to extreme demilitarization.”

Several ministers have expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that the talks in Cairo were conducted without informing them of their progress.

“When the agreements are presented, the ministers will rubber-stamp them because it would be very difficult to change any items,” said one minister.

It has not yet been clarified whether there will be a Cabinet vote on the agreements reached in Cairo.

Elior Levy and Roi Kais contributed to this report

Political crisis roils Baghdad as Maliki refuses to cede power

August 12, 2014

Political crisis roils Baghdad as Maliki refuses to cede power

By MICHAEL WILNERLAST UPDATED: 08/12/2014 01:16

Iraq’s president nominates successor to longtime PM; US warplanes conduct bombing campaign on Islamic State fighters at base of Mount Sinjar; Obama wants unity gov’t in Baghdad “as quickly as possible.”

via Political crisis roils Baghdad as Maliki refuses to cede power | JPost | Israel News.

 

US President Barack Obama delivers a statement on the situation in Iraq from his vacation home at Martha’U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a statement on the situation in Iraq from his vacation home at Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts August 11s Vineyard, Massachusetts August 11 Photo: REUTERS
 

WASHINGTON – In a political challenge to a country already under assault by an extremist Sunni army, Iraq’s longtime prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, is refusing to cede control as his term of office nears its end, suggesting over the weekend a willingness to use force to stay in power.

The power struggle in Baghdad is compounding a military crisis in northern Iraq, where the Islamic State, a radical religious militia holding swaths of Iraqi and Syrian territory, has challenged the control of the government.

At the invitation of that government and citing a moral imperative, the United States continued a military assault on Islamic State assets on Monday, including targets outside the city of Erbil as well as its first airstrikes against targets near Mount Sinjar. One series of bombings, at the base of the mountain refuge for religious minorities, included checkpoints, trucks, and US-made humvees commandeered and operated by the terrorist network.

Earlier on Monday, Iraq’s President Fouad Masoum nominated Haider al-Abadi as Maliki’s successor, after strong encouragement from Washington to abide by the country’s decade-old constitution.

Speaking to reporters from Martha’s Vineyard, US President Barack Obama congratulated Masoum and Abadi, encouraging the leadership to “unite Iraq’s different communities” and to “form a new cabinet as quickly as possible.”

Reiterating America’s commitment to the Iraqi people, Obama repeated his belief that a diverse, representative government in Baghdad was a necessary partner to meet the difficult task of confronting the Islamic State.

Abadi is a Shi’ite and a member of Maliki’s Dawa Party.

But Abadi’s own party colleagues publicly rejected his appointment on Monday, charging that his nomination had “no legitimacy” and that Abadi “only represents himself.”

In a demonstration of his anger, Maliki – still technically prime minister after eight years in power – ordered a show of force on the streets of Baghdad on Sunday leading up to the announcement, which was welcomed by the US, United Kingdom and United Nations.

The US has noticed “no discernible change” in the security presence in Baghdad, State Department deputy spokeswoman Marie Harf told reporters in Washington, adding that Maliki is still the country’s prime minister.

Abadi has 30 days to form and present a new government before Maliki officially steps down.

US Vice President Joe Biden called Masoum and Abadi on behalf of the United States, to congratulate them on the step forward.

“The prime minister-designate expressed his intent to move expeditiously to form a broad-based, inclusive government capable of countering the threat of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, and building a better future for Iraqis from all communities,” the White House said.

US Secretary of State John Kerry came out with a statement congratulating Abadi — and warning Maliki not to “stir the waters” with violence in the streets of the Iraqi capital.

UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon extended his congratulations, but with a rare critique of the internal politics of a member state.

Ban “is concerned that heightened political tensions coupled with the current security threat of Islamic State could lead the country into even deeper crisis,” his spokesman said.

The US, meanwhile, continued its aid airdrop on Mount Sinjar, where thousands of members of the Yazidi religious minority remain trapped by IS fighters bent on their extermination.

A fourth US airdrop of ready-to-eat meals, tents and thousands of gallons of water successfully landed on the mountaintop overnight, as London committed to the effort with fighter jets to guide its own cargo planes full of aid.

The greater question of how to secure safe passage for the Yazidis is still challenging the US military, however, which is “right now gripped by the immediacy of the crisis,” in the words of one Pentagon official.

“We’re currently assessing what we can and can’t do,” a Pentagon spokesman said.

“What is most important right now is that we deliver the much-needed water and shelter and food.”

But the White House reiterated its commitment to the prevention of genocide against the Yazidis, which was one of two primary justifications Obama cited last week as he authorized the use of force against the Islamic State.

“We’re reviewing options for removing the remaining civilians off the mountain,” deputy US national security adviser Ben Rhodes said. “Kurdish forces are helping, and we’re talking to the [United Nations] and other international partners about how to bring them to a safe space.”

The UN mission in Iraq said it is preparing a humanitarian corridor to permit the Yazidis to flee to safety.

Yazidis are followers of an ancient religion derived from Zoroastrianism. They are viewed as “devil worshipers” by the Islamic State’s Sunni extremists, who ordered them to convert to Islam or face death.

US fighter jets continued firing on the Islamic State on Sunday, striking several vehicles en route to Erbil, where the US maintains a consulate.

The State Department said the US has begun to arm Kurdish fighters in “full cooperation and coordination” with Baghdad, to help defend the northern territories with ground forces.

Reuters contributed to this report.