Archive for June 9, 2014

Hamas Spokesman: Abbas Lying to Americans

June 9, 2014

Hamas Spokesman: Abbas Lying to Americans, The Jewish PressMeir Halevi Siegel, June 9, 2014

(SHOCKING! Absolutely shocking! Who would ever have thunk such a thing? — DM)

Former spokesman for terror group says Abbas lied to Americans, tells group not to ‘harp on everything I tell the media’

Barack-Obama-and-Mahmoud-Abbas-275x174Obama and Abbas. One of them is lying and one of them won’t listen to the truth.

Conventional American wisdom has it that bringing Hamas into a Fatah-led government will be a moderating force on the terror group. Give them something to lose, they say, and they won’t be so fast to give it up.

It appears, unfortunately, that the opposite is actually true. Ihab al-Ghussein, a former spokesman for the Hamas government in Gaza, said Sunday that Abu Mazen has assured Hamas leaders that he has no intention of fulfilling his commitments to the United States. Instead, al-Guyessein said that Abu Mazen’s public statements have been constructed “in order to ‘trick the Americans’”.

According to Palestinian Media Watch al-Ghussein posted a note on his Facebook page poking fun at Palestinians who trust Abbas and the reconciliation. “You know what Mahmoud Abbas says behind closed doors?? He says: ‘Guys, let me [continue] saying what I say to the media. Those words are meant for the Americans and the occupation (i.e., Israel), not for you [Hamas].

“What’s important is what we agree on among ourselves. In other words, when I go out [publicly] and say that the government is my [Abbas] government and it recognizes ‘Israel’ and so on, fine – these words are meant to trick the Americans. But we agree that the government has nothing to do with politics (i.e., foreign relations). The same thing happened in 2006,’ he [Abbas] said: ‘Don’t harp on everything I tell the media, forget about the statements in the media,’” al-Ghussein wrote.

Off Topic: ‘Hamas Aiming to Boost West Bank Support, Terror Via Charity Groups’ Shin Bet Warns (VIDEO)

June 9, 2014

Hamas Aiming to Boost West Bank Support, Terror Via Charity Groups’ Shin Bet Warns (VIDEO), Algemeiner, Dave Bender, June 8, 2014

Gaza-based terror group Hamas is planning to encourage attacks against Israel as well as sap support in the West Bank from the Palestinian Authority (PA) by exploiting the Islamist “Dawa” social and cultural movement, a security source told the Ma’ariv daily on Sunday.

“In the long run, Hamas intends to create an alternative civilian infrastructure that will enable the replacement of the PA’s secular government with an Islamic government whose ideology will be similar to that of Hamas,” according to the Israel Security Agency (ISA) – aka the Shabak.

“The Dawa network – Hamas’ socio-economic infrastructure – is a central element in Hamas’ activity and a principal method employed to achieve its goals,” according to the ISA, who contend that “Hamas’ Dawa activity appears to bequeath Islamic education and values to the Palestinians in order to make them more religious.”

hamas-video-300x166The final scene of a new Hamas video published to coincide with Israeli Independence Day. Photo: Screenshot.

Gaza-based terror group Hamas is planning to encourage attacks against Israel as well as sap support in the West Bank from the Palestinian Authority (PA) by exploiting the Islamist “Dawa” social and cultural movement, a security source told the Ma’ariv daily on Sunday.

The PA had actively sought to stymie Hamas inroads in areas under it’s control, prior to the recent unity agreement between the two former rivals, but since then, all bets are off, Israeli security officials caution.

“In the long run, Hamas intends to create an alternative civilian infrastructure that will enable the replacement of the PA’s secular government with an Islamic government whose ideology will be similar to that of Hamas,” according to the Israel Security Agency (ISA) – aka the Shabak.

“The Dawa network – Hamas’ socio-economic infrastructure – is a central element in Hamas’ activity and a principal method employed to achieve its goals,” according to the ISA, who contend that “Hamas’ Dawa activity appears to bequeath Islamic education and values to the Palestinians in order to make them more religious.”

“Hamas’ goal is to expand and strengthen its status among the Palestinians, bring them closer to its ideology, including the notion of Jihad against Israel, and even recruiting on its behalf supporters and partakers in terrorist activities,” according to the ISA.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday slammed the Fatah-Hamas alliance, in opening comments at the government’s weekly cabinet session.

“Anyone hoping that the Palestinian Union of Fatah and Hamas will make Hamas more moderate is wrong,” Netanyahu charged.

“Instead of the PA taking control in Gaza, there are more and more signs that the exact opposite will happen,” he said, adding that “This means Hamas will increase its control over the PA in Judea and Samaria.”

While the security official admitted to the newspaper that, “we can’t shut down a Hamas kindergarten in Nablus, and there’s not a lot we can do about it,” he added that Israel must “keep tabs on and raise awareness of such activities.

“We view it as an important question, since such civilian activities are likely to strengthen the organization, and increase the likelihood of terror attacks.”

The ISA notes that Hamas’ activities are offered to the general Palestinian public, and not only to its followers. “As a result, the Palestinians are committed to Hamas in terms of ideology and values, and even in financial dependency on the assistance it provides,” the ISA said.

View a video (Hebrew) of recent Hamas activities among Palestinian students:

 

Battle to establish Islamic state across Iraq and Syria

June 9, 2014

Battle to establish Islamic state across Iraq and SyriaThe Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant now controls vast stretch of land

Patrick Cockburn Author Biography Amman
Monday 09 June 2014

via Battle to establish Islamic state across Iraq and Syria – Middle East – World – The Independent.

Islamic fundamentalists have opened new fronts in their battle to establish an Islamic state across Iraq and Syria as they launch attacks in cities which were previously under the control of the Baghdad government.

A multi-pronged assault across central and northern Iraq in the past four days shows that the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isis) has taken over from the al-Qa’ida organisation founded by Osama bin Laden as the most powerful and effective extreme jihadi group in the world.

Isis now controls or can operate with impunity in a great stretch of territory in western Iraq and eastern Syria, making it militarily the most successful jihadi movement ever.

Led since 2010 by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, also known as Abu Dua, it has proved itself even more violent and sectarian than what US officials call the “core” al-Qa’ida, led by Ayman al-Zawahiri, who is based in Pakistan. Isis is highly fanatical, killing Shia Muslims and Christians whenever possible, as well as militarily efficient and under tight direction by top leaders.

In Iraq in the past four days, it has fought its way into the northern capital of Mosul, sent a column of its fighters into the central city of Samarra and taken over Iraq’s largest university at Ramadi, in the west of the country. In addition, it launched devastating bombings targeting Shia civilians in Baghdad that killed at least 52 people.

The creation of a sort of proto-Caliphate by extreme jihadis in northern Syria and Iraq is provoking fears in surrounding countries such as Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey that they will become targets of battle-hardened Sunni fighters.

The well-coordinated attacks appear designed to keep the Iraqi security forces off balance, uncertain where the next attack will come. They started on Thursday when Isis fighters in trucks with heavy machine guns stormed into the city of Samarra, which is mostly Sunni but contains the golden-domed al-Askari shrine sacred to Shia. Destruction of this shrine by al-Qa’ida bombers in 2006 led to wholesale massacres of Sunni by Shia.

The Isis tactic is to make a surprise attack, inflict maximum casualties and spread fear before withdrawing without suffering heavy losses. On Friday, they attacked in Mosul, where their power is already strong enough to tax local businesses, from family groceries to mobile phone and construction companies. Some 200 people were killed in the fighting, according to local hospitals, though the government gives a figure of 59 dead, 21 of them policemen and 38 insurgents.

This assault was followed by an early-morning attack on Saturday on the University of Anbar at Ramadi that has 10,000 students. Ahmed al-Mehamdi, a student who was taken hostage, told a news agency that he was woken up by the sound of shots, looked out the window and saw armed men dressed in black running across the campus. They entered his dormitory, said they belonged to Isis, told everybody to stay in their rooms but took others away.

An undated picture released by Iraq’s Interior Ministry claiming to show Isis leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

One leader told female students:

“We will teach you a lesson you’ll never forget.” They turned the science building into their headquarters, but may later have retreated. On the same day, seven bombs exploded in an hour in Baghdad, killing at least 52 people.

Isis specialises in using militarily untrained foreign volunteers as suicide bombers either moving on foot wearing suicide vests, or driving vehicles packed with explosives. Often more than one suicide bomber is used, as happened yesterday when a vehicle exploded at the headquarters of a Kurdish party, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan in the town of Jalawla in the divided and much fought-over province of Diyala, north-east of Baghdad. In the confusion caused by the blast, a second bomber on foot slipped into the office and blew himself up, killing some 18 people, including a senior police officer.

The swift rise of Isis since Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi became its leader has come because the uprising of the Sunni in Syria in 2011 led the Iraqi Sunni to protest about their political and economic marginalisation since the fall of Saddam Hussein. Peaceful demonstrations from the end of 2012 won few concessions, with Iraq’s Shia-dominated government convinced that the protesters wanted not reform but a revolution returning their community to power. The five or six million Iraqi Sunni became more alienated and sympathetic towards armed action by Isis.

Isis launched a well-planned campaign last year including a successful assault on Abu Ghraib prison last summer to free leaders and experienced fighters. This January, they took over Fallujah, 40 miles west of Baghdad, and have held it ever since in the face of artillery and air attack. The military sophistication of Isis in Iraq is much greater than al-Qa’ida, the organisation out of which it grew, which reached the peak of its success in 2006-07 before the Americans turned many of the Sunni tribes against it.

Isis has the great advantage of being able to operate on both sides of the Syrian-Iraq border, though in Syria it is engaged in an intra-jihadi civil war with Jabhat al-Nusra, Ahrar al-Sham and other groups. But Isis controls Raqqa, the only provincial capital taken by the opposition, and much of eastern Syria outside enclaves held by the Kurds close to the Turkish border.

Isis is today a little more circumspect in killing all who work for the government including rubbish collectors, something that alienated the Sunni population previously. But horrifically violent, though professionally made propaganda videos show Isis forcing families with sons in the Iraqi army to dig their own graves before they are shot. The message is that their enemies can expect no mercy.

The violence continued yesterday as at least 18 people were killed in two explosions at the headquarters of a Kurdish political party in Iraq’s ethnically mixed province of Diyala. Isis claimed responsibility.

Most of the victims of Sunday’s attack were members of the Kurdish security forces who were guarding the office of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) party in the town of Jalawla.

The explosions were the latest in a show of strength by militants who in recent days have overrun parts of two major cities, occupied a university campus in western Iraq and set off a dozen car bombs in Baghdad.

Jalawla lies in disputed territory, and is one of several towns where Iraqi troops and Kurdish peshmerga regional guards have previously faced off, asserting their claims over the area. Both are a target for Sunni Islamist insurgents.

PM’s office: Israel will not unilaterally withdraw from West Bank

June 9, 2014

via PM’s office: Israel will not unilaterally withdraw from West Bank | The Times of Israel.

PM’s office: Israel will not unilaterally withdraw from West BankDenouncing Lapid peace plan, officials say you don’t make concessions for nothing in return; Herzog urges Yesh Atid to leave coalition
By Marissa Newman June 8, 2014, 10:45 pm

 

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks in the plenum hall of the Knesset on May 28, 2014. (photo credit: Flash90)
 

Israel will not make unilateral withdrawals from the West Bank, particularly if Hamas continues to hold sway, officials from the Prime Minister’s Office said Sunday. The officials were responding to Finance Minister Yair Lapid’s new peace plan that called for evacuation of parts of the area.

Get The Times of Israel’s Daily Edition by email
and never miss our top stories Free Sign up!

Officials also dismissed the finance minister’s demand that the Israeli government produce maps outlining future borders, saying “Any map that is presented will become the point of departure for the Palestinians’ demands.”

“Anyone with political experience knows that you don’t make concessions without [getting] anything in return, especially with a government partnered with a terror organization that wants to destroy Israel,” officials said. The sources also referred to the 2005 disengagement from Gaza as proof of the futility of these measures.

“We saw in Gaza the results of unilateral withdrawal,” they said.

“The prime minister will continue to lead the State of Israel responsibly, while preserving the national interests of the citizens of Israel, starting with its security.”

In a far-reaching speech at the Herzliya conference, an annual national security gathering, Lapid issued an appeal to return to negotiations with the Palestinians — despite the new Fatah-Hamas unity government — and outlined a new framework for peace that would draw borders and progress in three separate stages of Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank.

The finance minister also threatened to topple the government if right-wing calls to unilaterally annex areas of the West Bank are implemented.

Opposition leader Isaac Herzog appealed to Lapid to act on his threats and establish a coalition with the Labor party. “Go, get out of the government, it’s not too late,” he said, following Lapid’s speech. “Join us, and I promise you I will bring the other partners.”

 

Labor Party Leader Isaac Herzog speaks during a plenum session on the peace process, Monday, April 7, 2014 (photo credit: Flash90)
 

Housing Minister Uri Ariel of the Jewish Home party responded derisively to the finance minister’s threats, saying, “Israeli governments existed in the past without the Yesh Atid party, and will continue to exist without it.”

Tehran’s Chinese Missile Man

June 9, 2014

Tehran’s Chinese Missile ManAs Iran and the West resume nuclear talks, the Chinese engineer who helped Tehran develop its ballistic missiles is one of America’s most wanted, with a $5 million reward on his head.

via Tehran’s Chinese Missile Man – The Daily Beast.

 

 

Chinese businessman Li Fangwei, known as “Karl Lee,” is one of the most wanted men on the planet, with a bounty of $5 million on his head.

Li’s alleged offense: flouting the international ban on trading with Iran. But, according to an indictment unsealed in April, Li and his associates were doing business in New York City as recently at 2011—five years after U.S. officials in Beijing had first urged the Chinese government to take action against him, and two years after New York state authorities had indicted him on 119 counts of fraud and deception (PDF) in connection with his Iran dealings.

As international negotiators meet in Geneva on Monday for the next round of talks on the future of Iran’s nuclear program, Li’s career is testimony to the Islamic Republic’s success in building its conventional military power while enduring international sanctions for its nuclear program. The inability to rein him in—or bring him to justice—is a reflection of the enormous complications and conflicting interests that surround Iran’s weapons program.

Li, a 42-year-old metallurgical engineer and entrepreneur in the northeastern Chinese city of Dalian, has been “a principal contributor” to Tehran’s ballistic missile program for years, according to prosecutors. With Li’s assistance, Iran’s Ministry of Defense obtained high-strength metals that can be used to build ballistic missiles and gas centrifuges used in uranium enrichment. Iran’s missile arsenal (shared with Hezbollah in Lebanon) serves as its chief deterrent to oft-threatened attack by Israel or the United States.

Earlier this year Washington adopted Israel’s position that the ongoing nuclear talks should include discussion of Iran’s ballistic missile program, a demand that Iran spurned.

If the current negotiations break down, Israel and its allies in the U.S. Congress are sure to renew the call for a pre-emptive attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. If that were to happen, Iran might well fire the missiles manufactured with Li’s help at U.S. Navy vessels in the Persian Gulf, Israel’s cities, and its nuclear weapons facility at Dimona.

China has supported sanctions to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions, while insisting the sanctions be enforced multilaterally. The Chinese government objected to Li’s indictment in April saying it “resolutely opposes” the use of U.S. law to enforce a ban on trading with Iran.

In fact, the State Department has been trying—and failing—to get Beijing to take action against Li since the Bush administration.

In February 2013, Li told a Reuters reporter that he had not violated any laws and said he no longer accepted orders from Iran.

But in the world of Western arms control policymakers, Li remains notorious.

“Not since AQ Khan has a manufacturer of proliferation-sensitive technologies so brazenly and repeatedly sold their goods for use in prohibited programmes despite ongoing attention from national and international authorities,” according to British intelligence analysts Daniel B. Salisbury and Ian J. Steward of the Centre for Science and Security Studies in London in a recent article about Li’s career.

(Abdul Qadeer Khan is the Pakistani nuclear scientist who covertly shared nuclear technology with Iran and North Korea in the 1980s.)

The indictment of Li is “unprecedented for non-proliferation purposes and can be taken as a sign that the US government is still not satisfied with the responses received from the Chinese government,” wrote Salisbury and Stewart.

Former U.S. official David Albright and two colleagues called Li a “serial proliferator” in a May 8 analysis (PDF) for the Institute for Science and International Security.

“China’s lack of action over the years to shut down Li’s operations shows that it is willing to tolerate high levels of criminal behavior in violation of UN sanctions on Iran and the international export control regimes to which it belongs,” they wrote.

Not only has Li allegedly violated sanctions on Iran. He did so under the nose of U.S. authorities.  He is alleged to have used his front companies to conduct 165 transactions worth $8.5 million in the United States since 2006. While under indictment, he sold one unidentified U.S. firm 20 tons of graphite, according to prosecutors.

Li transferred money in and out of accounts with at least six banks located in New York, including Citibank, Morgan Chase, American Express Bank, Well Fargo, Bank of America, and Bank of China.

Five years ago, when U.S. diplomats complained that that Li had supplied Iran with a machine capable of manufacturing re-entry vehicle shells and solid rocket motor cases, a Chinese Foreign Ministry official spurned the demarche, according to an April 2009 cable published by Wikileaks.

“China’s business is its own business,” the official said, and Li’s firm would be regulated in accordance with China’s “very strict export control laws.”

Li’s dealings with Tehran continued through “an outsized network of front companies,” according to the indictment.

A September 2009 cable from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton blamed “a lack of political will by Chinese authorities.” She said some of them “probably continue to view ballistic missile related transfers as less of a priority than nuclear, chemical, or biological weapon-related transfers.”

After the U.S., China and other world powers imposed stiffer sanctions on Iran in 2009, Li “went underground.”  In 2011, he is said to have hosted several Iranians at his factory where he builds machinery to produce aramid fiber, which is used in ballistic missiles and gas centrifuges. Between 2010 and 2013 he “repeatedly traveled” to Iran for “extended periods” to conduct his business, according to the indictment.

He provided world-standard metal products specifically barred by the sanctions regime. In 2012, Li allegedly supplied the Iranians with 20,000 kilos of steel pipe and 1,300 aluminum alloy tubes. According to a September 2009 Wikileaks cable, Li provided tungsten, gyroscopes, and accelerometers to the Amin Industrial Complex, an Iranian weapons manufacturer.

Li’s story “leaves many unanswered questions,” wrote Salisbury and Stewart, whose institute is funded by the British government.

“What has allowed him to continue his activities for so long, whilst leaving such an extensive open-source trail?” they asked. “Perhaps, more importantly in the present, what is the full extent of his network? Are there more companies which Li is involved with, and what other technologies are they involved in manufacturing?”

As the Iranian and international powers seek to draft an agreement by July 20 to limit Iran’s nuclear program and end the sanctions, the saga of Li Fangwei suggests that Iran has well-placed allies in China. Washington wants to put Tehran’s engineering ally out of business, but Beijing doesn’t care to help

Steinitz: A bad deal will lead to an Iran with dozens of nuclear bombs 10 years from now

June 9, 2014

By JPOST.COM STAFFLAST

UPDATED: 06/09/2014 10:36

Strategic affairs minister warns world powers against signing deal that allows Iran to remain a threshold nuclear power while granting it legitimacy; says extending talks better than rushing to sign deal at any cost.

via Steinitz: A bad deal will lead to an Iran with dozens of nuclear bombs 10 years from now | JPost | Israel News.

 

Photo: EREZ HARODI – OSIM TSILUM
 

Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz on Monday laid out a stark scenario in which he described an Iran in possession of dozens of nuclear warheads ten years from now.

Speaking at the Herzliya Conference at the Interdisciplinary Center, Steinitz said that the nightmare scenario would likely be the result of Western powers signing a “bad deal” with Iran on its nuclear program.

 

Hezbollah Most Heavily Armed Force in Region Besides Israel

June 9, 2014

A second front is also developing with Iranian proxies ready to launch mid-to-long range missiles from Gaza.
By: Hana Levi JulianPublished: June 9th, 2014

via The Jewish Press » » Hezbollah Most Heavily Armed Force in Region Besides Israel.

 

IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz at ceremony to honor Harel Brigade, May 30, 2014
Photo Credit: Flash 90
 

The Lebanon-based Hezbollah guerrilla fighting force is among the most heavily armed in the region, according to IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz, who told the 2014 IDC Herzliya Conference on Monday that Israel is facing a lethal threat.

Israel’s military chief said just Israel and the top five nations of the world currently have more firepower today than Hezbollah. According to Gantz, the only nations more heavily armed than Hezbollah – which is supplied by Iran – are “the U.S., China, Russia, Israel, France, [and] the UK.”

It was a sobering moment for the audience at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, who heard that Israel is facing a new type of threat, one that originates from underground. Terrorists in Lebanon and in Gaza use bunkers, where they store their arms – in much the same way Israelis used underground facilities to produce bullets during the British Mandate to prepare for the 1948 War of Independence.

Attendees also heard the army chief explain that Israel’s neighbor to the north, Syria, is disintegrating. Regardless of what happens on the other side of the border, none of the options will be particularly good for Israel, Gantz explained. He added that “decades of conflict” are likely to continue in Syria, “perhaps more.” Hezbollah is actively involved in that war, fighting to defend President Bashar al-Assad; the experience gained in that fight may well aid the terrorist organization later in a future war against Israel, Gantz warned.

Moreover, a second front is again developing in the south with Gaza, where mid-to-long range missiles have again been stockpiled for a future war with Israel as well. Both the ruling Hamas terror organization and its allied Islamic Jihad terrorist group are fully backed by Iran, as is Hezbollah. All three would function as proxies for Iran, which has not given up its dream of annihilating Israel.

Nor has Iran abandoned its goal of developing a nuclear weapon of mass destruction, Gantz said.

Israel will take whatever action is deemed appropriate to neutralize that existential threat against the Jewish State, he said.

Bibi: Unilaterally Separate from Your ‘Two State’ Negotiations

June 9, 2014

By: Batya MedadPublished: June 8th, 2014

via The Jewish Press » » Bibi: Unilaterally Separate from Your ‘Two State’ Negotiations.

 

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu at a government meeting.
Photo Credit: Emil Salman / POOL / Flash 90
 

The entire concept of “two state solution” must be eradicated from the policy lexicon of the Israeli Government. Prime Minister Netanyahu is pushing us in the wrong direction.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday told the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that Israel “must separate from the Palestinians,” Bloomberg News reported on Friday, citing an unnamed official source.

No further details were provided by the source, but the news agency noted that the language “was reminiscent of the term ‘disengagement’ that Israel used to refer to its 2005 withdrawal of settlers and soldiers from the Gaza Strip, carried out unilaterally under then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in the absence of peacemaking.”

Netanyahu’s still trying to solve Israel’s security problems by recognizing and negotiating with the terrorists. This crazy distinction between Hamas and Fatah is totally fictional. They are really the same and playing the world for suckers, which unfortunately is too easy when it comes to anything antisemitic. Pretending that Fatah is fundamentally different from Hamas is like trying to cure skin cancer with make-up. And pretending that there can be a “peaceful” Palestinian state sic in the midst of the Land of Israel is the greatest lie of all.

This Israeli attempt to “achieve peace” by “negotiating with the Palestinians” sick reminds me of those who died of lung cancer, because they kept trying to alleviate back pain without having a proper checkup to determine the cause of the back-pain.

The Arab terrorism isn’t due to the fact that Jews are living in Judea, Samaria, Jordan Valley, Jerusalem, Haifa, Tel Aviv-Jaffa etc. It’s because the Arab leadership, including Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah want to destroy the State of Israel. Listen carefully to this clip on the PMW site

 

IDF chief: Dramatic armament taking place in Gaza

June 9, 2014

IDF chief: Dramatic armament taking place in GazaSpeaking at Herzliya Conference, Benny Gantz says region unstable, but Israeli deterrence keeping war at bayBy Aron Dónzis June 9, 2014, 10:28 am

via IDF chief: Dramatic armament taking place in Gaza | The Times of Israel.

Despite a period of relative calm between Israel and Gaza, terrorists in the Palestinian enclave are arming themselves with missiles that can reach deep into Israel’s heartland, IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz declared Monday.

Speaking at the Herzliya Conference, an annual national security gathering at the Interdisciplinary Center in the central coastal town, Gantz gave a sweeping overview of Israel’s security situation, saying instability was everywhere, but military deterrence was working to keep war at bay.

Gantz said Hamas in the Gaza Strip was not looking for another war with Israel, but terrorists there were still undertaking a “dramatic” replenishing of their missile stockpiles.

In Gaza there was has been “a dramatic increase in medium- and long-range rockets,” he said.

His statement came hours after two rockets were fired out of Gaza at southern Israel, causing no damage.

Gantz said that the Lebanon-based terror group Hezbollah also had no immediate plans to attack Israel, given the potential consequences.

“Hezbollah is deterred,” he said. “It knows what will happen if it enters a war against us, and that it will push Lebanon dozens of years backward.”

On Iran and its nuclear program, Gantz commented that “Iran’s desire to negotiate with the West is a result of its isolation and the newfound power of the street in the Middle East.”

He sounded relatively optimistic about the P5+1′s ongoing negotiations with the Islamic Republic, asserting that “with enough resolve, it’s possible to prevent Iran from getting nukes, whether with force or without.”

But what was a repeated theme throughout his address was the instability and unpredictability of the region.

“Jihadists are remaking the Sykes-Picot borders of old,” Gantz noted, referring to the World War I-era secret lines dividing the Middle East between British and French spheres of influence.

“We must remain vigilant and prepared, but we also cannot tell you what the story will be tomorrow. If we are sitting and enjoying a cup of espresso at 9:30 a.m., by 10:30 a.m. we could be at war.”

Gantz also touched upon Syria, with considerably less optimism: “It is like a deck of cards which has collapsed. As long as [President Bashar] Assad is in power, there will be no effective solution. I expect we could see another decade of violence there.”

He also warned against cutting Israel’s defense budget. According to Gantz, “We have no alternative but to stand here as a strong and united nation.”

The Obama Doctrine

June 9, 2014

Articles: The Obama Doctrine.

President Obama thought trading a deserter for five top terrorists would be a PR coup.  What does this tell us about our president as a person? 

At the most basic level, it shows that Obama does not share Americans’ visceral reaction to Bergdahl’s betrayal of his fellow soldiers and country.  Obama, and no doubt Kerry, thought a deserter could be palmed off as a perfectly fine hero.

Before rushing on to the usual chatter about Obama’s incompetence, his wanting to get attention off the VA, and his grandiose belief in his brilliance at negotiating with Islamist regimes, it is important to pause and consider why Obama’s gut reaction is so off.

Obama didn’t have a normal visceral reaction to the 9/11 attack in Benghazi, either.  Any normal person would have rushed to his post in the Situation Room to oversee a rescue attempt.  On that one, Obama skipped the Situation Room entirely, and the rescue attempt, and went to bed to get his beauty sleep for a Vegas fundraiser.  Something is off. 

Obama does not have a normal visceral reaction to Iran’s mullahs armed with nuclear weapons.  Just as the economic sanctions on Iran were beginning to bite, Obama lifted them entirely, restored Iran’s frozen assets, left their nuclear weapons program intact, and told Israel there will be “negative consequences” if they take out Iran’s nuclear facilities.  He is obviously comfortable with a nuclear Iran.  That is strange.

Obama does not have normal visceral reactions to jihadi groups.

Our president worked to install terrorists in power in Egypt, where they had been successfully suppressed for sixty years.  He helped depose our ally Mubarak and did his best to hand over Egypt to the Muslim Brothers, a Nazi-jihadi group dedicated to sharia law, the worldwide caliphate, and killing all the Jews on the planet.  Obama is still punishing Egypt for rising up and getting rid of the Brothers, by withholding military aid.  This is not appeasement; it is not even collaboration – it is working for your enemy’s cause.

Barack Obama doesn’t have a normal reaction to the Palestinians, who are busy lobbing 8,000 missiles into Israel from Gaza – murdering, maiming and terrifying men, women, and children.  Our president has once again chosen to flout American law, which bans aid to Hamas, and announced we will be funding Hamas as part of a “unity” government.

Obama does not recoil at Arab villagers sneaking into Jewish homes to bash a baby’s head against the wall.  President Obama understands and sympathizes with the Islamic cause.  He is proud of that.  He thinks the Arabs are the aggrieved party, and that the Israelis should “walk a mile in Palestinians’shoes.”  Obama’s gut check on the Israelis and the Palestinians is off.

Obama wants the terrorists to win.  He mistakes them for a civil rights group.

He is not unique in this, which is why the left-wing media are happy to cover for him and promote his anti-American policies as normal politics.  The left wing of the Democratic Party, including Hillary Clinton, doesn’t believe that Islamists are implacable enemies.  There is no violent, organized, widespread supremacist Islamic movement based on the mainstream teachings of Islam.  The problem is America and Israel.  We are too successful, too powerful, too white, and too Western for the left’s taste.  Frustrated Muslims are justified in wanting to kill Americans and Israelis.  It is we who need to change our ways.

His progressive base applauds Obama as community organizer to the world, fighting for social justice for the poor, angry Muslims who only hate and kill because they are mistreated by colonialists and bullying cowboys.

To leftists like our president, we are the bad guys.  Sharia law is a right.  Israeli’s self-defense and sovereignty are wrongs.  Islam is a beautiful religion; Judaism and Christianity are backward and hateful.  Islamophobia is real.  The jihadi threat is not real.

Steven Emerson, head of The Investigative Project on Terrorism, lists numerous cases of jihad in America, including the mass murders by Army Major Hasan and the Boston Marathon bombing, where he believes Obama’s pro-jihadi homeland security policies hobbled the FBI from successful pre-emptive action.

“Numerous experts on Islamic terrorism like myself – and I had given 143 lectures at the FBI, CIA – were banned from speaking to any U.S. government counterterrorism conferences,” Mr. Emerson told The Washington Times.  “Instead, these agencies were ordered to invite Muslim Brotherhood front groups.”

The Obama administration has invited Muslim Brotherhood front groups, CAIR and others, to control FBI counter-terrorism training.  The FBI has been forced to never mention the term Islamic extremist.  The FBI is not allowed to describe the Koran as the teachings of Mohammed – it is the revealed word of God.  The Obama administration won’t allow the FBI to mention young Middle Eastern males.  The FBI is not allowed to link al-Qaeda to the first World Trade Center and Khobar Tower bombings. 

Calling this political correctness is to trivialize it.  If these policies were limited to discussions in the faculty lounge, they could be called political correctness.  When our president hands power over our homeland security to jihadi groups, it is collaboration with the enemy.

Obama has a pattern of promoting terrorist goals.  Obama knows his approach, if honestly reported to the public, would be hugely unpopular.  That is why he does it secretly and relies on his Democrat lapdog Congress and media to back him up.  Until Bergdahl, they covered successfully for him every time.

Perhaps Obama really does think Bergdahl served with honor.  Obama himself has carved out a gray zone with the jihadis, partaking equally of capitulation and treason.  The Obama Doctrine:  enable jihadis to dominate the West.