Archive for September 24, 2013

Israeli minister warns West: Don’t be fooled by Iran’s shifted rhetoric

September 24, 2013

Israeli minister warns West: Don’t be fooled by Iran’s shifted rhetoric – Diplomacy and Defense Israel News | Haaretz.

Strategic and Intelligence Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz likens Iran’s nuclear program to Syria, where it took threats of a U.S. attack to convince the regime to give up chemical weapons.

By | Sep. 24, 2013 | 10:43 AM
Iranian President Hassan Rohani shakes hands with his predecessor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Iranian President Hassan Rohani shakes hands with his predecessor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad June 18, 2013. Photo by AP

The world must not let up pressure on Iran’s nuclear program simply because President Hassan Rohani has shifted the Islamic Republic’s rhetoric toward the West, Israeli Strategic and Intelligence Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz said Tuesday.

“We’re seeing an attack of smiles, moderation and pleasantry from the new president, Rohani,” Steinitz, who is responsible for Israel’s international relations, told Army Radio. “As of now, we’re not seeing any change in substance.”

Steinitz said that despite the reconciliatory words, Iran has yet to honor UN Security Council resolutions calling on Iran to stop enriching uranium, dismantle the installation in Qom and stop construction of the heavy-water reactor.

The current talks on Iranian nuclear program could turn out to be like “Munich Agreement,” Steinitz said, alluding to the deal among European powers before World War II now seen as an act of appeasement toward Nazi Germany.

“We definitely prefer a diplomatic solution to a military solution, but we can reach it only through a great deal of [economic and military] pressure,” he said.

The lesson from the crisis over chemical weapons use in Syria is applicable to Iran, Steinitz said.

“The moment the United States announced it was going to attack – when the military threat was real – the Syrians announced that they were willing to give up their chemical weapons,” he said. “Without a doubt, Syria’s policy underwent a dramatic change the moment there was an actual military threat.”

Steinitz also warned Western powers not to repeat the mistake made during attempts to contain North Korea’s nuclear program. He said that though a deal was signed and “everyone applauded,” and within a few years they manufactured nuclear weapons.

“Rohani is out to fool us, and part of the world wants to be fooled,” Steinitz said. “It’s tiny Israel’s job to open their eyes. It’s a long struggle, and it won’t be over in a day.”

Gunfire continues even as Kenyan forces say they control mall

September 24, 2013

Gunfire continues even as Kenyan forces say they control mall | The Times of Israel.

Government claims to have freed hostages, but source says at least 10 people still being held by attackers at besieged Nairobi shopping center

September 24, 2013, 7:50 am
A plume of black smoke billows rising over the Westgate Mall, following large explosions and heavy gunfire, in Nairobi, Kenya Monday, Sept. 23, 2013. ( photo credit: AP Photo/Riccardo Gangale)

A plume of black smoke billows rising over the Westgate Mall, following large explosions and heavy gunfire, in Nairobi, Kenya Monday, Sept. 23, 2013. ( photo credit: AP Photo/Riccardo Gangale)

NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — Kenyan security forces battled al-Qaeda-linked terrorists in an upscale mall for a fourth day Tuesday in what they said was a final push to rescue the last few hostages in a siege that has left at least 62 people dead.

Despite Kenyan government assurances of success on Twitter, another explosion and more gunfire could be heard coming from the mall at around 6:30 a.m. local time on Tuesday, Associated Press reporters at the scene said. Security forces carried a body out of the mall, which remained on fire, with flames and smoke visible.

While the government announced Sunday that “most” hostages had been released, a security expert with contacts inside the mall said at least 10 were still being held by a band of attackers described as “a multinational collection from all over the world.”

Kenay’s Citizen TV said that six of the remaining attackers had been killed, Reuters reported. The TV report was unsourced and gave no further information.

Kenyan Foreign Minister Amina Mohamed said “two or three Americans” and “one Brit” were among those who attacked the mall.

She said in an interview with the PBS “NewsHour” program that the Americans were 18 to 19 years old, of Somali or Arab origin and lived “in Minnesota and one other place” in the US. The attacker from Britain was a woman who has “done this many times before,” Mohamed said.

US officials said they were looking into whether any Americans were involved. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Monday that the department had “no definitive evidence of the nationalities or the identities” of the attackers.

The security expert, who insisted on anonymity to talk freely about the situation, said many hostages had been freed or escaped in the previous 24-36 hours, including some who were in hiding.

However, there were at least 30 hostages when the assault by al-Shabab militants began Saturday, he said, and “it’s clear” that Kenyan security officials “haven’t cleared the building fully.”

Somalia’s al-Qaeda-linked rebel group, al-Shabab, which claimed responsibility for the attack, said the hostage-takers were well-armed and ready to take on the Kenyan forces.

Flames and dark plumes of smoke rose Monday above the Westgate shopping complex for more than an hour after four large explosions rocked the surrounding neighborhood. The smoke was pouring through a large skylight inside the mall’s main department and grocery store, where mattresses and other flammable goods appeared to have been set on fire, a person with knowledge of the rescue operation told The Associated Press.

The explosions were followed by volleys of gunfire as police helicopters and a military jet circled overhead, giving the neighborhood the feel of a war zone.

By Monday evening, Kenyan security officials claimed the upper hand.

“Taken control of all the floors. We’re not here to feed the attackers with pastries but to finish and punish them,” Police Inspector General David Kimaiyo said on Twitter.

Kenya’s Interior Minister Joseph Ole Lenku said the evacuation of hostages had gone “very, very well” and that Kenyan officials were “very certain” that few if any hostages were left in the building.

But with the mall cordoned off and under heavy security it was not possible to independently verify the assertions. Similar claims of a quick resolution were made by Kenyan officials on Sunday and the siege continued. Authorities have also not provided any details on how many hostages were freed or how many still remain captive.

Three attackers were killed in the fighting Monday, Kenyan authorities said, and more than 10 suspects arrested. Eleven Kenyan soldiers were wounded in the running gun battles.

An al-Shabab spokesman, Sheik Ali Mohamud Rage, said in an audio file posted on a militant website that the attackers had been ordered to “take punitive action against the hostages” if force was used to try to rescue them.

The attackers have lots of ammunition, the militant group said in a Twitter feed, adding that Kenya’s government would be responsible for any loss of hostages’ lives.

A Western security official in Nairobi who insisted on not being named to share information about the rescue operation said the only reason the siege hadn’t yet ended would be because hostages were still inside.

Westgate mall, a vast complex with multiple banks that have secure vaults and bulletproof glass partitions, as well as a casino, is difficult to take, the official said. “They are not made for storming,” he said of the labyrinth of shops, restaurants and offices. “They’re made to be unstormable.”

At least 62 people were killed in the assault Saturday by some 12 to 15 al-Shabab militants wielding grenades and firing on civilians inside the mall, which includes shops for such retail giants as Nike, Adidas and Bose and is popular with foreigners and wealthy Kenyans.

The militants specifically targeted non-Muslims, and at least 18 foreigners were among the dead, including six Britons, as well as citizens from France, Canada, the Netherlands, Australia, Peru, India, Ghana, South Africa and China. Nearly 200 people were wounded, including five Americans.

Fighters from an array of nations participated in the assault, according to Kenya’s Chief of Defense forces Gen. Julius Karangi. “We have an idea who these people are and they are clearly a multinational collection from all over the world,” he said.

Al-Shabab, whose name means “The Youth” in Arabic, said the mall attack was in retribution for Kenyan forces’ 2011 push into neighboring Somalia. It was the deadliest terrorist attack in Kenya since the 1998 al-Qaeda truck bombing of the US Embassy in Nairobi, which killed more than 200 people.

An extremist Islamic terrorist force that grew out of the anarchy that crippled Somalia after warlords ousted a longtime dictator in 1991, al-Shabab is estimated to have several thousand fighters, including a few hundred foreigners, among them militants from the Middle East with experience in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. Others are young, raw recruits from Somali communities in the United States and Europe.

For years Minnesota has been the center of a federal investigation into the recruiting of fighters for al-Shabab. Authorities say about two dozen young men have left Minnesota since 2007 to join the group. Minnesota’s Somali community is the largest in the U.S.

Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud said the attack showed that al-Shabab was a threat not just to Somalia but to the international community.

Mohamed, the Kenyan foreign minister, said her country needs to work with other governments to fight the increasing terrorist threat and “much more with the US and the UK, because both the victims and the perpetrators came from Kenya, the United Kingdom and the United States.

“That just goes to underline the global nature of this war that we are fighting,” she said.

Reports that some of the attackers may have been Somalis who lived in the United States illustrate the global nature of the militant group, the Somali leader said in a speech at Ohio State University. “Today, there are clear evidences that Shabab is not a threat to Somalia and Somali people only,” he said. “They are a threat to the continent of Africa, and the world at large.”

As the crisis passed the 48-hour mark, a video emerged that was taken by someone inside the mall’s main department store when the assault began. It showed frightened and unsure shoppers crouching as long, loud volleys of gunfire could be heard.

Kenyans in many parts of the country stood in long lines Monday to donate blood to aid the nearly 200 people injured in the attack. Fundraisers raised hundreds of thousands of dollars, though government officials warned of scam artists taking advantage of the tragedy.

Israelis to boycott Rohani’s UN address

September 24, 2013

Israelis to boycott Rohani’s UN address – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Minister Yuval Steinitz, Israel’s current most senior representative to General Assembly, tells Ynet he and Ambassador Ron Prosor will not listen to Iranian president’s speech Tuesday. Officials waiting for PM’s instructions on whether to walk out of auditorium when address begins or just stay away

Yitzhak Benhorin

Published: 09.24.13, 09:13 / Israel News

WASHINGTON – Israel‘s official representatives will boycott Iranian President Hassan Rohani‘s address at the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday.

Minister Yuval Steinitz, who is currently Israel’s most senior representative to the General Assembly and Israel’s Ambassador to the UN Ron Prosor have confirmed that they will not sit in the auditorium during the speech.

The two officials are now waiting for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu‘s instructions on whether to leave the auditorium when Rohani starts speaking, or just stay away altogether.

The Iranian president is expected to deliver a moderate address and not to reiterate the statements made by his predecessor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, which included threats to wipe Israel off the map, Holocaust denials and a variety of accusations against the United States and the West.

Steinitz told Ynet that his meetings with European foreign ministers in recent weeks, in Europe and at the UN, have revealed that they are also expecting actions and not just talk from Rohani.

“British Foreign Secretary Hague has also stated that he is not impressed by Rohani’s rhetoric,” the minister noted. He said the European diplomats “are waiting for Rohani’s address to see if he is just declaring his desire for a dialogue, or is actually willing to implement the Security Council resolutions.”

Western reps to remain in their seats

The Israeli delegation will likely be alone in its decision to leave the auditorium or boycott the speech. In recent years, when former Iranian President Ahmadinejad addressed the UN, dozens of Western representatives had walked out of the auditorium during his speeches, but this is not expected to repeat itself this time.

Rohani will deliver his first address in New York on Tuesday evening, several hours after US President Barack Obama. On Thursday, on the sidelines of the General Assembly, the foreign ministers of the six world powers – including US Secretary of State John Kerry – are expected to hold a historical meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad-Javad Zarif.

Zarif, who served as Iran‘s ambassador to the UN last decade, began his first day in New York on Monday with meeting with the foreign ministers of the United Kingdom, Italy and the Netherlands, and with European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton.

Zarif conveyed to the Europeans that his country was interested in entering serious negotiations and quickly solving the nuclear crisis. After the meeting, Ashton told reporters that she was impressed by his “energy and determination.”

It’s time to define Islamism as a crime against humanity

September 24, 2013

Terra Incognita: It’s time to define Islamism as a crime against humanity | JPost | Israel News.

( This article is so true and so important that I implore you to read it. –  JW )

_________________________________________________________________________

09/23/2013 21:46
The attacks at Nairobi, Kenya’s Westgate shopping mall follow a familiar pattern to other attacks that occurred in the last few days: in Pakistan, where 81 were killed in the bombing of a church, and in Nigeria where 159 people were slaughtered by Islamists near Maiduguri.

The Westgate shopping mall during a shootout between armed men and the police in Nairobi Sept. 22

The Westgate shopping mall during a shootout between armed men and the police in Nairobi Sept. 22 Photo: REUTERS
The attacks at Nairobi, Kenya’s Westgate shopping mall follow a familiar pattern to other attacks that occurred in the last few days: in Pakistan, where 81 were killed in the bombing of a church, and in Nigeria where 159 people were slaughtered by Islamists near Maiduguri.
The media and political reactions also follow a neatly crafted script we have all become accustomed to. First Islamist terrorists attack civilians, attempting to sort out the Muslims from the non-Muslims so as to kill only one group. There are the condemnations of “senseless acts of violence” and appeals for “calm and unity.” Then all is forgotten.
Those terrorists captured alive will be put on trial and perhaps executed. And life goes back to normal with the refrain, “terrorism will not prevail.” The problem is that this script misses a central facet of Islamist terrorism: We must stop treating it as a simple isolated crime; even the word “terrorism” has begun to downplay its actual horror; rather it must be defined as a worldwide crime against humanity.
When the al-Shabaab attack began in Kenya, witnesses related that Muslims were permitted to leave. “They came and said: ‘If you are Muslim, stand up. We’ve come to rescue you,’” Elijah Lamau told the BBC.The Muslims put their hands up and walked past the gunmen. “One man with a Christian first name but a Muslim-sounding surname managed to escape the attackers by putting his thumb over his first name on his ID. However… an Indian man standing next to him who was asked for the name of the Prophet Muhammad’s mother was shot dead when he was unable to answer.”Similarly, in 2004, 17 al-Qaida terrorists attacked the Oasis compound housing oilcompany employees in Khobar, Saudi Arabia.Upon entering the compound, the terrorists waylaid the first Arab looking man they saw and said: “Are you Muslim or Christian? We don’t want to kill Muslims.Show us where the Americans and Westerners live.” The killers then came upon a US citizen from Iraq named Abu Hashem.He later told reporters that the attackers were polite; “They gave me a lecture on Islam and said they were defending their country and ridding it of infidels.” “Don’t be afraid,” they told him, “we won’t kill Muslims, even if you are an American.”

The murderers then proceeded to hunt down non-Muslims from the US, South Africa, Sri Lanka, India, the Philippines, Egypt and Sweden. After a 24-hour siege, 22 of the residents were murdered and many others wounded.

In another instance, on November 27, 2008, in the midst of the Mumbai terror attacks, the perpetrators received a call from their Pakistan-based masters, asking, “How many hostages do you have?” The terrorist responded that they had killed a Belgian hostage but had others.

“I hope there is no Muslim among them.”

“No, none,” replied the killer.

Later the Pakistani handlers called the terrorists at the Oberoi Trident Hotel and spoke to those located on the 10th floor. The intercepted conversation goes as follows: “Kill all the hostages, except the two Muslims, keep your phone switched on so we can hear the gunfire.”

They reply, “We have three foreigners, including women from Singapore and China.”

Then the terrorist can be heard telling the hostages to line up, asking the two Muslims to stand to one side. Gunfire reverberates, followed by cheering from the terrorists.

IT IS interesting how quickly reports of these attacks downplay the guilt of the attackers and filter references to the focus on non-Muslims and the allowing some Muslims to escape the carnage.

In November 2009 Fareed Zakaria at CNN did a special on the Mumbai transcripts. Zakaria claims the men were sent from Pakistan with “instructions simply to kill.” After playing one clip in which any reference to letting Muslims live is absent, he notes that “they were told to go to Mumbai and kill as many people as they could.” Actually they were told to go to Mumbai to kill non-Muslims.

Zakaria emphasizes that the terrorists were poverty-stricken children. “These are peasant boys,” he says. To his credit, he does play a transcript from the terrorist attack at Nariman house, where the Chabad center was targeted. The CNN host mentions the “animus against Jews” but then claims, “in the ’60s and ’70s most Indian Muslims would not even know where Palestine was.”

He compares the actions of the terrorists to “brainwashing… it’s sort of the Manchurian Candidate writ large.” Later in the program the presenter again attempts to emphasize how young the terrorists were “these are peasant boys… these kids seem like teenagers… it [their action] seems almost mercenary.”

Note how often Zakaria stresses that these were “boys” – he calls them “boys” twice, “kids” twice and “teenagers” once.

The only terrorist captured alive, Ajmal Kasab, was 21 at the time of the attacks.

The oldest attacker, Nasir Abu Umar, was 28, while the youngest was 20.

Why the conscious effort to redefine these men as children? Why the conscious decision not to include the part of the transcript including the instructions not to kill Muslims, and to paint the attack as indiscriminate? The real story was that these men set out to kill as many non-Muslims as possible.

The media seeks to hide this facet to foster the narrative of “unity,” yet presenting Muslims and non-Muslims as the victims of terror obscures the genocidal nature of the crime. When the radical, right wing Golden Dawn party gained popularity last year, the media highlighted the “antiimmigrant violence” it was involved in.

There was no downplaying the members as “peasant boys” or obscuring of who the violence was directed at.

THESE THREE examples – Mumbai, Khobar and Nairobi – are only the tip of the iceberg. From southern Thailand, to Mindanao in the Philippines, to Syria and beyond, the Islamist or jihadist mentality leads to the mass killing of either non- Muslims, or sometimes to the sectarian slaughter of Muslims, usually Shi’ites.

Hundreds of Shi’ites are massacred every year in Pakistan by the Taliban, for instance.

In many cases the terrorists separate Shi’ites from non-Shi’ites, usually identifying them by their first names. For instance, on August 17, 2012, it was reported that “gunmen wearing army uniforms checked the identification cards of the passengers, lined up the Shi’ite passengers on the roadside, tied their hands and then opened fire on them.” Sound familiar?

Many over the years have identified Islamism as “Islamo-fascism” and argued that it champions a form of genocide. But it has not sunk in. We don’t prosecute terrorists as war criminals committing crimes against humanity. Instead, we often obfuscate the nature of terrorist attacks, pretending that terrorists are “misguided youth” who “set out to kill as many as possible.”

The genocidal nature of this type of terror is downplayed. The New York Times described the Nairobi perpetrators as “Shabaab militant attackers.” Really? When they killed 78-year-old Ghanian poet Kofi Awooner and Kenyan radio host Ruhila Adatia-Sood, was that part of a “military” operation? The scenes of piles of dead women sprawled on the floor of the mall; is that “militant?”

In a Times article on the anniversary of the Ku Klux Klan bombing of a church in 1963 the perpetrators are not called “militants.” Yet the objectives and methods of the KKK were no different than the Shabaab or Taliban: the killing of specific groups. No one pretends the KKK “set out to kill indiscriminately.”

The KKK is estimated to have killed 4,743 people between 1882 and 1968. The number of primarily sectarian targeted killings in Iraq in 2012 was 4,574.

That’s just Iraq.

Adding up the number of victims from attacks patterned along the lines of the one carried out in Kenya, or the ethnic cleansing of non-Muslims in places such as Egypt and Northern Nigeria, would bring the number up to tens of thousands in the past decade – millions in the past century. This is a “soft” genocide, embodied by the firebombing of a church in Egypt or the shooting of Alawite truck drivers in Syria.

It is time to stop hiding what connects Mumbai to Westgate and Khobar. It is a worldwide campaign of ethnic cleansing and murder, and the world community must define this as a crime against humanity and not just as “terrorism.”

Between US and Iran, a long-sought breakthrough

September 24, 2013

Between US and Iran, a long-sought breakthrough | JPost | Israel News.

By MICHAEL WILNER, JERUSALEM POST CORRESPONDENT
09/24/2013 07:16
Secretary of State John Kerry says the United States must show Iran, at a UN meeting in NYC, that the American government is ready and willing to use force to enforce what it considers a pillar of international order.

Iran nuclear talks in Istanbul

Iran nuclear talks in Istanbul Photo: REUTERS/Tolga Adanali/Pool
NEW YORK – Direct talks between the United States and Iran have eluded their governments for more than three decades, but that will come to an end this week in New York as their top diplomats meet to discuss a negotiated settlement over Iran’s controversial nuclear program.

When US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Muhammad Javad Zarif meet on Thursday during the 68th United Nations General Assembly, the two parties will be breaking ground simply by sitting at the same table together.

Kerry has spent the past month warning members of Congress that Iran is watching Washington’s response to the use of chemical weapons in Syria, which crossed a well established, oft-repeated American redline on the production, proliferation and use of weapons of mass destruction.

Kerry said the US must show Iran that its government is ready and willing to use force to enforce what it considers a pillar of international order.

But he will have to reinforce that in person with Zarif, who recently took over Iran’s nuclear portfolio and has, in the past, displayed a compatibility with his Western counterparts.

“Iran is hoping you look the other way,” Kerry told senators last month during the Syria crisis, as he pressed for military strikes against the regime of President Bashar Assad.

Hoping for another, perhaps more intentional diplomatic breakthrough than the Russian-brokered deal on Syria – on an issue US President Barack Obama has called more urgent to American national security interests – Kerry is expected to press Zarif on an immediate suspension of uranium enrichment to 20 percent and the closure of the Fordow nuclear facility, burrowed in a mountain and naturally fortified from attack.

Zarif is expected to approach talks with an openness to an interim deal that would keep Iran’s extensive program intact while providing sanctions relief after punishing financial restrictions have taken a devastating toll on Iran’s economy.

Iran’s diplomatic gestures thus far, leading up to the General Assembly since the inauguration of President Hassan Rouhani in August, have been peripheral to the nuclear program itself.

Iran has released prisoners, exchanged letters with the US and delayed the fueling of their plutonium reactor in Arak, but it made no moves to slow down its uranium centrifuges; in fact, it has installed more advanced devices that can enrich uranium at a more efficient pace.

If its government so chooses, Iran could produce enough weaponsgrade uranium for one or two nuclear bombs, experts say.

Zarif’s stance going into Thursday’s meeting will likely be outlined in Rouhani’s speech on Tuesday, much anticipated by US officials.

In years past, former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmedinejad would prompt a walkout by US and Israeli diplomats.

Washington and Europe rush headlong towards accepting a nuclear Iran

September 24, 2013

Washington and Europe rush headlong towards accepting a nuclear Iran.

DEBKAfile Special Report September 24, 2013, 9:49 AM (IDT)
Iranian president Hassan Rouhani lands in New York

Iranian president Hassan Rouhani lands in New York

The Iranian delegation arrived at the UN General Assembly in New York this week to an enthusiastic Western welcome led by the Obama administration, without having rescinded one iota of its aggressive policies or nuclear ambitions.

“We welcome an Iran ready to engage seriously through that (diplomatic) process given that it represents the international community’s commitment to hold Iran accountable, but also being open to a diplomatic resolution.”

This convoluted message was how Ben Rhodes, US Deputy National Security Adviser, referred Monday, Sept. 23, to the US Secretary of State John Kerry’s get-together with Iranian Mohammad Javad Zarif Thursday, along with foreign ministers of the five world powers.

Their acclaimed purpose is to test Tehran’s willingness for progress in nuclear negotiations. But before this test, the Obama administration agreed to the highest-level face-to-face contact between the US and Iran since the 1979 Iranian revolution.
Rhodes did not shut the door on a meeting, even a brief one, between President Barack Obama and President Hassan Rouhani at this week’s annual gathering of world leaders in New York.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague and European Union Foreign Executive Catherine Ashton had already met the new Iranian foreign minister Monday, after which Ashton commented that she had found him resolved to go forward with talks (on Iran’s nuclear program) and “many things flow from that.”

How to account for this burst of eagerness in Washington and Europe for a rapprochement with the Revolutionary Republic of Iran?
Has Tehran agreed to give up its nuclear weapon program? The new president and even supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei say their government will never develop a nuclear bomb. So what if they said so? Have their words caused Iran’s nuclear facilities, open and concealed, to suddenly vanish like a desert mirage?

Has Iran announced itself ready to open up all its nuclear facilities to international watchdog inspections? Will Rouhani make this offer when he addresses the UN Assembly Wednesday?
Has Iran promised to stop developing ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear warheads?
And what about the Islamic Republic’s long sponsorship of state terrorism against Israeli and Jewish targets across the world? Have those death-dealing networks been recalled home?

And has Tehran started pulling its troops out of Syria and terminated its partnership in butchery with Bashar Assad, given up its control of Lebanon or stopped sending rockets to Hizballah?

Has anyone noticed that Iran is building a Red Sea Naval base at Port Sudan facing the coast of Saudi Arabia? Or that a large-scale munitions production and distribution center for supplying Iran’s Middle East allies is going up in Sudan?

And finally, has Iran abandoned its ambition to wipe Israel off the map, or stopped denying the Nazi Holocaust?

The slick new president easily ducked the second question by saying: “I’m not a historian.”
He and members of his regime have suddenly been given free license to fill the op-ed pages of important Western media with smooth propaganda for Western audiences.
But while polishing his civilized aspect towards the West, Rouhani made sure the day before he flew to New York to display Iran’s steel teeth with its largest display ever of missiles with a range of 2,000 kilometers. The 30 weapons on show included 12 Sejil and 18 Ghadr missiles which can reach Israel and US Gulf bases – although Rouhani stated with a straight face that they were “for defensive purposes only.”

The turbaned Iranian president has an obvious motive for gulling the West into accepting the Islamic Republic’s conversion from a regime bent on “exporting the Islamic revolution” to a lover of peace: He was elected to end the sanctions crippling the country, without giving up the regime’s objectives.
It is less clear what moves President Obama to swallow the Iranian bait and go for a historic US rapprochement with the revolutionary republic. On every occasion, he protests that Israel’s security is his overriding concern. Yet he is rushing to accept a nuclear Iran whose avowed ambition is to destroy Israel.

Under their slick new façade, the ayatollahs have not changed their spots. Washington has.
Sources close to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu say he is determined to tear the false veil off Iran’s face – even if he is a lone voice, when he addresses the UN later this month.

Last Thursday, Netanyahu tried throwing water on Rouhani’s claims that Iran’s nuclear program was peaceful, calling them fraudulent. He dismissed Iran’s offer to engage in diplomacy as false “media spin,” which should not fool anyone.
But no one in the West was listening. And at home, people were asking what happened to Netanyahu’s solemn pre-election pledge to stop Iran attaining a nuclear bomb.

Quran Translation Banned By Russian Court; Top Islamic Cleric Ravil Gainutdin Protests ‘Outrageous’ Order

September 24, 2013

Quran Translation Banned By Russian Court; Top Islamic Cleric Ravil Gainutdin Protests ‘Outrageous’ Order.

quran banned russia

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, right, and Russia’s top Muslim Cleric Ravil Gainutdin meet in a central mosque in Moscow, Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010. | AP

MOSCOW — Russia’s top Islamic cleric has protested a provincial court order to declare a translation of the Quran as extremist and to destroy it.

Ravil Gainutdin, the head of the Council of Muftis of Russia, said in an open letter to President Vladimir Putin released Monday that the ruling was “illiterate” and “provocative.”

The Quran is available in Russian translation, but the court last week ruled that the translation by Elmir Kuliyev published in Saudi Arabia in 2002 violated federal law banning extremist materials.

Gainutdin said that the “Russian Muslims were appalled by the neglect of law shown by the court” in the Black Sea port of Novorossiisk and demanded that the verdict be revoked. He said the court’s order to destroy the Muslim holy book was particularly outrageous.

Netanyahu Warns Against Iran-U.S. Nuclear-Weapons Deal | New Republic

September 24, 2013

Netanyahu Warns Against Iran-U.S. Nuclear-Weapons Deal | New Republic.

The U.N. General Assembly in September is one of two times each year that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can virtually guarantee himself space in the U.S. media, the other being the AIPAC Conference every spring.

Several times in past years, his government has used the weeks preceding these events to drum up concern over his top priority, which is halting Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program, so that he can then come to America, put a capper on the weeks of chatter, and then, hopefully, extract promises from President Barack Obama—who, for the record, has pledged to prevent an Iranian nuclear bomb. To take just two examples: Israeli government sources provided ample quotes for two different articles, one in August 2010 and another in January 2012, suggesting that Israel was close to attacking Iran, kicking off much talk stateside and ending in renewed vows of U.S. support, roughly, for the Israeli position.

But this year, Bibi speaks in a climate not of his own making. The election of relatively moderate Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and subsequent diplomatic overtures between him and President Barack Obama have people really talking of a diplomatic deal. Mainstream validators like The New Yorker’s Laura Secor and Abbas Milani in The New Republic counsel cautious optimism, and former hawks like Kenneth Pollack suggest that containment is a viable option for a nuclear Iran.

This state of affairs, in a phrase, freaks Netanyahu out. He considers a nuclear-armed Iran an existential threat to his country, and has spent the past several years threatening to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, both because he really just might and in order to pressure the Obama administration into making its own plans for a future attack. And he does not trust the prospect of a deal with Iran’s new president because Iran’s top leaders are unelected clerics who believe part of the purpose of the Islamic Republic is to “liberate” Jerusalem from “the Zionist entity.” In other words, there are many good reasons to be skeptical of a deal, even if it is probably worth trying to secure one anyway; distrust of Iranian diplomacy is one of Netanayahu’s more reasonable positions.

On Monday, Bibi tried to take some control of events in advance of his U.N. speech a week from Tuesday. An “Israeli official involved in drafting the speech” revealed to The New York Times that in his speech, Bibi will warn, “A bad agreement is worse than no agreement at all.” The official—who, if you met him, would probably bear a strong physical resemblance to Bibi’s right-hand man, future Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer—also said that Netanyahu will compare a hypothetical Iranian bargain to the various ones the U.S. has struck with North Korea, all of which turned out to be worth not even the paper they were written on.

The key paragraph in the Times article, actually, is the final one:

This year, Israeli officials fear, the highest drama may be Mr. Obama greeting Mr. Rouhani on the sidelines of the General Assembly, something that has not happened for decades and which they worry would leave Israel more isolated in dealing with Iran.

Much of the ideological disagreement between the Israeli and U.S. governments over how far Iran should be allowed to progress in its nuclear program and whether there should be an attack comes down to decidedly non-ideological differences. Chiefly: Israel is much closer to Iran, and therefore would be more threatened by a nuclear Iran; and Israel’s military ability to launch an effective strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities pales in comparison to the U.S.’s. (This is why Israel is especially activated over an underground enrichment facility called Fordo: It is buried so deep underground that it would likely withstand Israel’s most powerful bombs. But U.S. bunker-busters are believed capable of destroying it.)

Bibi does not want Israel to attack Iran—he wants the U.S. to attack Iran. And he is right to prefer that. But in order to urge the U.S. toward an attack, he needs to execute a delicate balancing act whereby he pushes the U.S. toward greater strictness while ultimately staying on the same page. Over the past four-and-a-half years, he has done an altogether exceptional job. But he was helped in no small part by the combination of cartoonishness and anti-Semitism of former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, an ideal enemy. And now Iran has this new guy making nice noises and even bringing Iran’s Jewish parliament member (Democrat from Great Neck?) to the U.N. Suddenly a deal does not seem so far-fetched.

And a deal is terrifying to Bibi because, of course, a bad agreement is worse than no agreement. Besides, he will ultimately almost certainly have to accept whatever deal gets made—remember, it is important that he stay on the same page as the U.S. So even though the best possible outcome is a legitimately good deal that conclusively ends the Iranian path to a nuclear weapon, it is cheaper (and, arguably, wiser) for Netanyahu instead to warn against a deal and implicitly advocate the continued threat of an American military strike.

Depending on how for-real Rouhani is, Netanyahu should be wary of doing this. A real deal would be great for Israel, too. If a nuclear Iran is Israel’s number-one nightmare, the aforementioned state of “more isolated” ought to be a close second.

Terrorist: Nairobi Mall Hit Over ‘Jewish Shops’

September 24, 2013

Terrorist: Nairobi Mall Hit Over ‘Jewish Shops’ – Defense/Security – News – Israel National News.

Member of terrorist group that took over a mall in Nairobi said it was targeted because of its ‘Jewish shops,’ among other reasons.

By David Lev

First Publish: 9/23/2013, 8:05 PM
Kenyan soldiers fight terrorists in Westgate Mall

Kenyan soldiers fight terrorists in Westgate Mall
Reuters

As Kenyan military forces moved to liberate Nairobi’s Westgate Mall from the hands of Islamist terrorists, a representative of Al-Shabaab, the Somali terror group behind the attack, told Arab satellite network Al Jazeera that the attack was overdue, and that the mall was chosen for the attack because “it is a place where there are Jewish and American shops.”

The attack, which began Saturday, was still underway Tuesday, with the terrorists holed up in the building, holding a number of hostages. At least 69 people have been killed so far, as Kenyan soldiers try to remove the Islamists who are occupying the building.

The Islamist group attacked the mall – a place where innocent civilians shop – because “it is a place where tourists from across the world come to shop, where diplomats gather. It is a place where Kenya’s decision-makers go to relax and enjoy themselves.” As the group demands the imposition of Islamic law in Kenya and the removal of all Western influences – and tourists – Al Shabaab felt justified in attacking the site, the terrorist spokesperson said.

In addition, he said, the attack was justified revenge against the Kenyan government for its actions against other Islamists.

“On civilian deaths, Kenya should first be asked why they bombed innocent Somali civilians in refugee camps, why they bombed innocent people in Gedo and Jubba regions. They should be asked that first before us,” he said, adding that the group had freed all Muslims before taking over the mall.

The Westgate mall is owned by an Israeli group, as are several of the stores; the attackers first entered the mall through an Israeli-owned coffee shop.

“We have been late in attacking Nairobi. We did not attack before because they were expecting us to attack. Our aim is to attack our enemy when they least expect us to attack. This time they were not expecting us to attack. We choose when to attack, and best time to attack,” the spokesperson said.

Iranian Jews Reject Invitation to Meet Rouhani

September 24, 2013

Iranian Jews Reject Invitation to Meet Rouhani – Jewish World – News – Israel National News.

Members of the Iranian Jewish community in the U.S. refuse meeting with new Iranian president despite his recent moderate comments.
By Elad Benari

First Publish: 9/24/2013, 5:45 AM
Iranian president Hassan Rouhani

Iranian president Hassan Rouhani
Reuters

Members of the Iranian Jewish community in the United States have refused an invitation to meet with the new Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, despite his recent moderate comments, reports the Jewish Week.

The decision to reject Rouhani’s invitation for a meeting during his visit to New York for the UN General Assembly came after considerable discussion among the leadership of the Iranian Jewish community in New York and Los Angeles over the weekend.

“The impetus of our decision was that when the president had a chance to redeem himself on the question of the Holocaust, he did not do that,” a leader of the Iranian American Jewish Federation in New York told the Jewish Week.

He was referring to Rouhani’s response, when asked by an American journalist whether he believed the Holocaust was a historical fact. The president chose to avoid a direct reply, saying he was a politician, not a historian.

In addition, Sam Kermanian, senior adviser to the Iranian American Jewish Federation in Los Angeles, noted that Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, when asked a similar question about the authenticity of the Holocaust, responded by saying that Iran condemns all murders, including “the murder of Palestinians by Israelis.”

“To compare accidental deaths to systematic murder shows that they don’t understand the world’s sensitivities to such a horrific event,” Kermanian said.

The New York and Los Angeles groups, made up primarily of prominent businessmen, are separate but seek consensus on major issues.

A third factor, Kermanian added, was Rouhani choosing to bring to the U.S. with him Iran’s only Jewish member of parliament, Siamak Moreh Sedgh, a 48-year-old doctor who has been an outspoken critic of Israel.

The concern was that Sedgh would be used as a propaganda tool, castigating Zionism and Israel’s policies toward PA Arabs, noted the Jewish Week.

American-Jewish Iranians are in a delicate position, deeply concerned about the fate of the 20,000 Jews still in their homeland, noted the report. The leaders in the U.S. do not want to offend Tehran by rejecting the meeting with Rouhani, but they are unwilling to hold a meeting with him for fear that it would be misinterpreted and actually used to mislead the Obama administration and U.S. public into thinking the Iranian Jewish community has fallen for Rouhani’s charm initiative.

Rouhani, who the West as described as a moderate, has hinted since his election that he would be willing to reach a deal regarding his country’s nuclear program. He recently surprised Jews around the world by tweeting a Rosh Hashanah greeting. Foreign Minister Zarif later tweeted a greeting of his own but, when asked whether Iran’s new government would stop denying the Holocaust, replied by saying, “Iran never denied it. The man who was perceived to be denying it is now gone. Happy New Year.”

The Iranian Jewish leaders told the Jewish Week they had hoped Rouhani would offer some specific proposals or expand the freedom of the Iranian people.

“But we have not seen anything yet,” a local leader said.

The decision not to meet with Rouhani was endorsed by Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, who told the Jewish Week that Rouhani was “a master of charm and deception.”

“He had an opportunity to send a strong signal simply by answering [the Holocaust question] in a different way. The fact that he wouldn’t say it was an historical fact sends a clear signal to everybody,” said Hoenlein.

Hoenlein noted that despite Rouhani’s more benign rhetoric, asserting that he seeks dialogue with the U.S. and a peaceful resolution to the confrontation with Washington, “he and his officials have said they are not going to stop their nuclear program.”

The local Iranian Jewish leaders said that if invited, they might, under certain conditions, agree to meet with Sedgh, the Jewish parliament member, but as one said, “We are hoping he won’t ask.