Archive for September 23, 2013

Iran president brings ‘charm offensive’ to U.N.; will Obama buy it? – CNN.com

September 23, 2013

Iran president brings ‘charm offensive’ to U.N.; will Obama buy it? – CNN.com.

(CNN) — This week’s United Nations meeting could mark a turning point in the acidic relationship between Iran and the United States.

Will U.S. President Barack Obama shake the hand of newly elected Iranian President Hassan Rouhani? Will the two presidents even hold a meeting?

Those are key questions after Rouhani’s “we must work together” opinion piece published by the Washington Post’s website last week.

His comments have sparked optimism on the streets of Iran’s capital, where residents are hopeful as they take note of their new president’s unprecedented charm offensive pushing for better relations with Washington.

But the Iranian president’s new approach hasn’t played as well in Israel.

The New York Times reported Sunday that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is stepping up an effort to blunt Iran’s diplomatic offensive, and plans to warn the United Nations that overtures toward a nuclear deal could be a trap.

Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful energy, but the United States and others suspect it’s for atomic bombs.

The dispute about why Iran is seeking nuclear capability has prompted international sanctions and escalated concerns about additional warfare in the Middle East.

In his op-ed, Rouhani wrote that he wants “a constructive approach” between his country and the world, including about Iran’s nuclear program.

“We must work together to end the unhealthy rivalries and interferences that fuel violence and drive us apart,” Rouhani said.

Analysts are divided about Rouhani and his sincerity in addressing his country’s nuclear program. But there’s one thing all analysts agree on: the op-ed was a jumping off point for a very high-profile public relations push.

And this week, Rouhani could take things a step further.

Analyst: Rouhani needs to strike a deal quickly

In many ways, Rouhani’s recent election is like Obama’s in 2008: Rouhani enjoys enormous political capital, offering an opportunity to renew U.S.-Iran relations.

Rouhani overcame hard-line conservatives by campaigning as a centrist and a reformer, using a “hope and prudence” slogan.

To keep hard-liners at bay, Rouhani now must deliver something — namely, economic relief as Iran strains under global sanctions — or his critics will prevail as they did against Obama in 2009 when his own venture on U.S.-Iran diplomacy foundered, one analyst said.

“Now the roles are reversed: Rouhani needs to strike a deal quickly,” said Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, who authored “A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama’s Diplomacy with Iran.”

This week’s U.N. General Assembly meeting “could be quite decisive,” Parsi said.

“That’s going to be the moment where the two sides have to invest the political capital needed. Otherwise it will go nowhere. It’s going to be costly politically to strike a deal. There’s going to be critics on both sides,” Parsi said. “There is a need for a huge dose of political will to be injected into the process.”

Will the two presidents meet?

Obama and Rouhani are both scheduled to deliver speeches at the U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday. But it’s unclear whether the two presidents will meet.

Elliott Abrams, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said Obama shouldn’t meet with Rouhani during the U.N. gathering, though shaking hands in a corridor would be appropriate.

Abrams says that’s because while Rouhani is Iran’s president, he is not the country’s leader. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is the supreme leader of Iran.

“They are not counterparts, they are not equal,” said Abrams, who also supervised U.S. policy in the Middle East under former President George W. Bush. “So for the president to meet with him, I think confers too great a recognition on him.”

Abrams said Rouhani was a skilled political tactician when he was the country’s chief nuclear negotiator from 2003 to 2005.

“Remember this is the guy — Rouhani — who wrote several years ago with pride how he tied us up in negotiations while the nuclear program (of Iran) was going forward,” Abrams said. “So we should approach this with skepticism.”

White House weighs in

The Obama administration has welcomed Rouhani’s published column.

“But the fact of the matter is actions are what are going to be determinative here,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said. “The Iranians, for a number of years now, have been unwilling to live up to their obligations to the international community as it relates to their nuclear program.”

The international community’s economic sanctions against Iran has “taken a significant toll on their economy and put pressure on them to come back to the bargaining table,” Earnest said.

He did acknowledge that Rouhani now enjoys a window of opportunity against his hard-line adversaries at home, but Iran must “demonstrate their seriousness of purpose” and show “their nuclear program is for exclusively peaceful means.”

For now, Obama’s schedule this week doesn’t contain any meetings with Iranian representatives, Earnest said.

Asked if the United States is willing to ease sanctions against Iran, Earnest said such economic pressure “is what has brought the Iranians to the table.”

Optimism in Tehran

On the streets of Iran’s capital, many appear to be hopeful that their president’s overtures toward the United States are a good sign. But they’re also realistic that 34 years of mistrust will not disappear overnight.

“I am 99% sure things will be better,” said Tehran resident Syed Ali Akbar. “I can just feel it.”

Barber Hassan Ahmadi said he wants sanctions to end.

“I want to see better relations,” he said, “so we can live a little easier.”

Ali Hayati wasn’t even born the last time Iran and the United States had diplomatic relations. But now, he feels like there’s a chance for change.

“I want to see Mr. Rouhani and Mr. Obama sit in front of each other and speak about life,” he said.

At the House of Persian Carpets in the famous Tehran Bazaar, merchant Sadegh Kiyaei said he’s optimistic.

“We believe that two nations — Iran and America — they realize that they need each other. They like each other,” he said. “And they feel that it’s the right time to get together and to start talking at least.”

CNN’s Reza Sayah contributed to this report from Tehran. CNN’s Catherine E. Shoichet contributed from Atlanta.

US Secretary of State Kerry and Iranian FM Zarif to meet at UN nuclear talks

September 23, 2013

US Secretary of State Kerry and Iranian FM Zarif to meet at UN nuclear talks | JPost | Israel News.

By REUTERS
09/23/2013 20:27
Highest level meeting in years to take place during talks between Islamic Republic and 6 world powers; US State Department says ready to work with Iran if it engages seriously on nuclear program.

Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif (C) arrives at Baghdad International Airport Sept. 8

Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif (C) arrives at Baghdad International Airport Sept. 8 Photo: REUTERS
UNITED NATIONS – Iran’s new government on Monday agreed to new talks with six world powers at the United Nations – including the United States – on its nuclear program during this week’s gathering of world leaders in New York.

That meeting with Iran’s new Foreign Minister Mohammad Zarif will involve US Secretary of State John Kerry, which is highly unusual given that the United States has not maintained diplomatic relations with Iran since 1980.

The announcement of the planned talks, after a meeting between EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Zarif, raised hopes that the annual United Nations General Assembly could bring a thaw in relations between arch-enemies Iran and the United States.

Ashton told reporters that Zarif would join the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany at a meeting that has been scheduled for Thursday to discuss the Iranian nuclear program, which is at the heart of tensions between Tehran and the West.

The West believes Iran has been trying to develop nuclear weapons and is determined to stop this, imposing tough economic sanctions. Iran says it is not trying to produce a bomb but has insisted on its right to enrich uranium for the purpose of peaceful energy production.

High-level contacts between both the United States and Iran are extremely rare. The last time that a US secretary of state and an Iranian foreign minister spoke face-to-face appears to have been more than six years ago.

In May 2007, then-US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made clear she was open to talking to her Iranian counterpart, Manouchehr Mottaki, at an international conference in Egypt, but the encounter amounted to pleasantries over ice cream.

US officials have said a meeting is also possible on the sidelines of the UN assembly between President Barack Obama and Iran’s newly elected centrist President Hassan Rouhani, who has shown an apparent desire to take a more conciliatory approach towards the West since taking office last month.

If it happens, it would be the first between US and Iranian government heads since before the 1979 Islamic revolution that toppled the US-backed Shah, and could help ease tensions in the Middle East that have been worsening given the crisis in Syria.

Iran is a key ally of Syrian President Bashar Assad, a US foe whose country has been torn by civil war since 2011.

US State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the United States is ready to work with Rouhani if his government engages seriously in efforts to resolve the standoff over Iran’s nuclear program.

“Secretary Kerry welcomes the Foreign Minister’s commitment to a substantive response and to his agreement to meeting in the short term with permanent U.N. Security Council members and Germany coordinated by EU High Representative Ashton to discuss the nuclear program,” Psaki said.

The EU, led by bloc’s top diplomat Ashton, has chaired the talks between Iran and the so-called P5+1 – Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, as well as Germany – which have made little headway in spite of years of negotiations.

Ashton said the meeting in New York would be “short discussions,” and added that she would represent the P5+1 in a meeting with Zarif in Geneva in October.

‘ENERGY AND DETERMINATION’

Ashton said she had “a good and constructive discussion” in what was the first face-to-face meeting with Zarif.

Asked about the possibility of a relaxation of sanctions on Iran – which some analysts see as the reason for a more conciliatory approach from the Iranians – Ashton said: “What I saw today was energy and determination to try and move forward in our talks.”

“Many things go from that. But this was a first meeting in order to establish how we would work together. I don’t add any more to it than that,” Ashton added.

Asked if Zarif had made any mention of the possibility of Iran suspending its uranium enrichment as the West has demanded – and whether the negotiating effort could be on the verge of a breakthrough – Ashton said: “We didn’t talk about the detail of what we would do.”

Ashton added, “In terms of whether we are on the verge of breakthrough, I would put it like this: I was struck, as I said, by the energy and determination that the foreign minister demonstrated to me.”

She said she looked for every opportunity to resolve the issue of Iran’s nuclear program, adding: “I hope this will be one.”

Speaking before his trip to New York, Rouhani said on Monday he would use his visit to the United Nations to present the “true face of Iran” and to pursue talks and cooperation with the West to end the nuclear dispute.

“Unfortunately in recent years the face of Iran, a great and civilized nation, has been presented in another way,” Rouhani said, according to comments published on his official website.

“I and my colleagues will take the opportunity to present the true face of Iran as a cultured and peace-loving country,” he added.

Rouhani did not make clear who he blames for any distortion of Iran’s image. But the comments suggest he is intent on distancing himself from the controversial, outspoken approach to the West adopted by predecessor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

But Rouhani, a former nuclear negotiator under reformist former President Mohammad Khatami, also targeted the West over sanctions he said had resulted in suffering.

“On this trip, I will try to deliver the voice of the oppressed people of Iran to the world, and we should say that sanctions are an illegal and unacceptable path,” he said.

“The West should opt for the path of talks and cooperation and consider mutual interests.”

Rouhani has vowed to improve Iran’s ailing economy, which has suffered deeply as a result of the sanctions.

Last week, his tone was endorsed by Iran’s most powerful figure, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who spoke of “heroic flexibility,” suggesting a new willingness to engage in diplomacy with Iran’s adversaries.

Iranian media reported on Monday that authorities in Iran have pardoned 80 prisoners ahead of Rouhani’s visit to the United Nations. In a tentative sign that hardline policies are starting to soften following Rouhani’s inauguration last month, authorities freed prominent human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh and at least 10 other prisoners last week.

Kenya: Forces in control of all mall floors

September 23, 2013

Kenya: Forces in control of all mall floors | The Times of Israel.

Interior ministry says operation underway to end standoff — in its 3rd day — with al-Shabab terrorists as two gunmen killed; death toll mounts to 62

September 23, 2013, 6:58 pm
A group of Kenyan soldiers run across the outside of the Westgate Mall as large explosions and heavy gunfire are heard in Nairobi, Kenya Monday, Sept. 23, 2013. Four large blasts rocked Kenya's Westgate Mall on Monday, sending large plumes of smoke over an upscale suburb as Kenyan military forces sought to rescue an unknown number of hostages held by al-Qaeda-linked militants. (Photo credit: AP/Ben Curtis

NAIROBI, Kenya — The Kenyan police said Monday that special forces involved in ending the siege of the Westgate Mall in Nairobi by al-Qaeda-linked terrorists have taken control of all the floors in the shopping center.

The inspector general of the national police service tweeted Monday forces are now in “control of all the floors,” adding “we’re not here to feed the attackers with pastries but to finish and punish them.”

Earlier, four thunderous explosions rocked the mall as top Kenyan officials said two hostage takers, part of “a multinational collection from all over the world,” had been killed, as the standoff entered its third day Monday.

Kenya’s interior minister said the evacuation of hostages “has gone very, very well” and that Kenyan officials are “very certain” that there are few if any hostages left in the building.

Interior Minister Joseph Ole Lenku also revised the death toll to 62. Kenyan officials earlier said 59 people have died since the siege on Westgate Mall began on Saturday, while the Red Cross had put the toll at 68, then in a tweet lowered it to 62, saying some bodies had been counted twice.

Dark plumes of smoke rose from the mall for more than an hour after four large explosions rocked the upscale Westlands neighborhood. A person with knowledge of the rescue operation told The Associated Press that the smoke was rising up and out of a large skylight inside the mall’s main department and grocery store, Nakumatt, where goods like mattresses may have been lit on fire.

Kenya Chief of Defense forces Gen. Julius Karangi said fighters from an array of nations participated in the attack claimed by al-Shabab, a Somali group allied with al-Qaeda.

“We have an idea who these people are and they are clearly a multinational collection from all over the world,” he said.

Karangi said Kenyan forces were in charge of all floors inside the mall, though terrorists could still be hiding inside. Earlier witness reports had indicated that a woman was among the estimated 10 to 15 attackers. Lenku said that instead some male attackers had dressed up like women.

The four explosions were followed by volleys of gunfire, then a thick, dark column of smoke that burned for roughly 90 minutes. Military and police helicopters and one plane circled over the Nairobi mall, giving the upscale neighborhood the feel of a war zone.

Westgate Mall is at least partially owned by Israelis, and reports circulated that Israeli commandos were on the ground to assist in the response. Four restaurants inside the mall are Israeli-run or owned, including a branch of Arcaffe, which was reportedly the first location inside the mall targeted by the terrorists.

In Israel, a senior defense official said there were no Israeli forces participating in an assault, but said it was possible that Israeli advisers were providing assistance. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was discussing a classified military issue, would not elaborate.

Gilad Millo, a Nairobi-based Israeli, said two Israeli men and a woman who were in the mall when the attack began were unharmed and safe.

Yariv Kedar, one of the three Israelis who was in Arcaffe at the time, told Channel 2 he “heard the gunfire getting closer” and bullets whizzed “over our heads” before he managed to escape.

“We started by hearing gunshots downstairs and outside. Later we heard them come inside. We took cover. Then we saw two gunmen wearing black turbans. I saw them shoot,” said Patrick Kuria, an employee at Artcaffe.

President Shimon Peres, in a Sunday letter to Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, said, “I wish to extend my deepest condolences to the people of Kenya on the horrific terror attack in Nairobi. From the Holy Land we pray for the release of the hostages, the full recovery of the injured, and comfort for the families of the victims.”

Israel has close ties to Kenya going back many years. In recent years, Israel has identified East Africa as an area of strategic interest and stepped up ties with Kenya and other neighboring countries, due to shared threats posed by al-Qaeda and other extremist elements. In 2002, militants bombed an Israeli-owned luxury hotel near Mombasa, killing 13 people, and tried to shoot down an Israeli airliner at the same time.

On Sunday, Kenyan officials announced that “most” hostages had been rescued. But no numbers were given. Kenyan officials have never said how many hostages they thought the attackers had, but have said preserving the hostages’ lives is a top priority, greatly complicating the final fight against the attackers.

Kenyans and foreigners were among those confirmed dead, including British, French, Canadians, Indians, a Ghanaian, a South African and a Chinese woman. The UK Foreign Office said Monday it has confirmed the deaths of four British nationals.

From neighboring Somalia, spokesman Sheik Ali Mohamud Rage for al-Shabab — the militant group that claimed responsibility for the attack — said in an audio file posted on a website that the hostage takers had been ordered to “take punitive action against the hostages” if force was used to try to rescue them.

At the Oshwal Centre next to the mall, the Red Cross was using a squat concrete structure that houses a Hindu temple as a triage center. Medical workers attended to at least two wounded Kenyan soldiers there on Monday.

Al-Shabab said on a Twitter feed, an account that unlike some others appears to be genuine, that the attackers had lots of ammunition. The feed said that Kenya’s government would be responsible for any loss of hostages’ lives.

A large military assault began on the mall shortly before sundown on Sunday, with one helicopter skimming very close to the roof of the shopping complex as a loud explosion rang out, far larger than any previous grenade blast or gunfire volley. Officials said the siege would soon end and said “most” hostages had been rescued and that officials controlled “most” of the mall. But on Monday the standoff remained.

As the crisis surpassed the 48-hour mark, video taken by someone inside the mall’s main department store when the assault began emerged. The video showed frightened and unsure shoppers crouching as long and loud volleys of gunfire could be heard.

The al-Shabab extremists stormed the mall on Saturday from two sides, throwing grenades and firing on civilians.

Kenyan authorities said they would do their utmost to save hostages’ lives, but no officials could say precisely how many people were being held captive. Kenya’s Red Cross said in a statement, citing police, that 49 people had been reported missing. Officials did not make an explicit link but that number could give an indication of the number of people held captive.

Al-Shabab said the attack, targeting non-Muslims, was in retribution for Kenyan forces’ 2011 push into neighboring Somalia.

Muslim Brotherhood banned by Egyptian court

September 23, 2013

Muslim Brotherhood banned by Egyptian court | World news | theguardian.com.

( So much for the best laid plans of mice and Obama… – JW )

Court rules that Islamist party’s assets should be confiscated as crackdown on supporters of Mohamed Morsi escalates

theguardian.com, Monday 23 September 2013 15.35 BST

Muslim Brotherhood supporters

Muslim Brotherhood supporters protesting in Cairo, Egypt, this month. Photograph: Khaled Elfiqi/EPA

The Egyptian authorities have banned the Muslim Brotherhood, sealing the marginalisation of the Islamist movement that was the country’s most powerful political group until as recently as the July overthrow of Mohamed Morsi.

A court on Monday ordered the freezing of the Brotherhood’s assets and also banned its spin-off groups, state media reported.

In practice, the group had almost been forced underground already by the arrest this summer of thousands of its members – including most of its leaders – and the killing of about 1,000 more.

It is a familiar predicament for the Brotherhood, which has been banned for most of its 85-year history and has successfully fought off every threat to its existence.

Originally banned under Gamal Abdel Nasser, it was tacitly tolerated under his successor, Anwar Sadat. During the last years of Hosni Mubarak’s regime, several of its members were allowed to be elected to parliament in an independent capacity.

“I don’t think it will have an effect,” Abdel-Rahman Daour, a pro-Morsi activist close to several leading Brotherhood members, said of the new ban.

“People think the Brotherhood can be dissolved through governmental decisions. But it has existed for 85 years and survived far worse.”

The group’s London-based spokesman, Abdullah al-Haddad, tweeted: “The Muslim Brotherhood are part and parcel of Egyptian society. Corrupt illegitimate judicial decisions cannot change that … [The Muslim Brotherhood] will continue to be present on the ground: they cannot kill an idea, they tried before and failed – they are trying again and they will fail.”

Brotherhood members who remain at liberty say that the arbitrary arrests and state-led killings of their colleagues remain a far more serious threat to the organisation’s operational capacity.

Only a handful of senior Brothers dare live in the open, and two recently told the Guardian that they were unsure of who was now in charge of the group, following the arrest of its leader, Mohamed Badie, and his deputies.

Young members say this breakdown in communication has made the group more fragmented, and also finally given them the chance to have more say in the activities of the group, which is usually highly hierarchical.

“Now the youth are just by themselves,” said Daour. “And they work together far better than when the leaders are involved. Now that the leadership is gone, no one needs to ask permission for anything any more.”

In an example of the Brotherhood’s current organisational chaos, a group of younger members spent over two months drafting an apology for some of the mistakes the movement made during the post-Mubarak period. But when the statement was released on a Brotherhood-linked website, one of the remaining Brotherhood leaders instantly ordered its removal, claiming it did not represent the group.

Daour said this had frustrated young members but claimed they still wanted to remain part of the group. “No one is going to leave. But it’s going to get more revolutionary,” Daour argued.

Thought to number between 300,000 and 1 million members, the Brotherhood remains highly unpopular among much of the rest of Egypt‘s population of 85 million, who blame the group for trying to grab too much power following Morsi’s election in 2012.

John Kerry to meet with Iranian FM at UN

September 23, 2013

John Kerry to meet with Iranian FM at UN | The Times of Israel.

UN chief negotiator Catherine Ashton says Iran, six key nations to hold nuclear talks in New York on Thursday

September 23, 2013, 7:02 pm US Secretary of State John Kerry meets with European Union High Representative Catherine Ashton before the Meeting of EU Ministers of Foreign Affairs at the National Gallery of Art in Vilnius, Lithuania, Saturday, Sept. 7, 2013. (photo credit: AP/Susan Walsh)

US Secretary of State John Kerry meets with European Union High Representative Catherine Ashton before the Meeting of EU Ministers of Foreign Affairs at the National Gallery of Art in Vilnius, Lithuania, Saturday, Sept. 7, 2013. (photo credit: AP/Susan Walsh)

Iran’s new foreign minister will join talks with six key nations trying to rein in the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program later this week, the European Union’s foreign policy chief said Monday.

The Thursday meeting is to include US Secretary of State John Kerry, and will be the highest level meeting between US and Iranian officials since 1979, according to a Wall Street Journal report. 

Catherine Ashton, the chief nuclear negotiator, told reporters after meeting Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif that she saw “energy and determination” for talks with the US, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany to move forward. Foreign ministers of the six nations are scheduled to meet on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly on Thursday.

The meeting, Ashton said, would likely be a ”short discussion,” but she hoped it would pave the way for a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear issue.

Ashton said she and her team will meet with Zarif again in October to follow up on Thursday’s meeting to continue their discussion on reviving long-stalled negotiations.

“We had a good and constructive discussion,” she said of her half-hour meeting with Zarif. “We didn’t talk about the details of what we would do. The purpose of this meeting was to establish how we would go forward.”

The election of Iran’s new president, Hasan Rouhani, considered a relative moderate in Iran’s hard-line clerical regime, has sparked speculation about possible movement on the nuclear issue.

On Friday, the White House intimated that a meeting between President Barack Obama and Rouhani could be a possibility when both leaders at the UN General Assembly. It was revealed last week that the two leaders have exchanged correspondence.

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, White House deputy spokesman Josh Earnest said the US would be ready to engage in talks “on the basis of mutual respect” with Iran over its disputed nuclear program. Earnest said the White House wants Tehran to prove that its program is only for civilian purposes.

Earnest’s signals came after similar statements by White House spokesman Jay Carney, who said that Obama would be willing to sit down with Rouhani if he got the impression that Tehran was serious about its intention to curb its nuclear program. 

The UN Security Council has imposed four rounds of sanctions against Iran because of concerns it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons and its refusal to suspend uranium enrichment. The US and its Western allies have imposed even more punishing sanctions which have severely affected Iran’s economy and drawn criticism from its citizens.

Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful, aimed only at producing energy and isotopes for medical use.

Asked if she thought a breakthrough was imminent on restarting negotiations, Ashton replied, “I was struck, as I said, by the energy and determination that the foreign minister demonstrated to me.”

“I have worked, I think, very hard to find a way in which we can address this issue of great concern, and I will take every opportunity to try and do that — and I hope this will be one,” she said.

Rohani told NBC last week that Iran has “never pursued or sought a nuclear bomb, and we are not going to do so.”

He said last month that the Foreign Ministry — not the Supreme National Security Council — will lead nuclear talks with world powers, a shift away from security officials being in control.

Assad: Syria will allow access to chemical sites

September 23, 2013

Assad: Syria will allow access to chemical sites – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Syrian president says his government will allow international experts access to its chemical weapons sites but that rebels might block them from reaching locations

Reuters

Published: 09.23.13, 14:46 / Israel News

In an interview with Chinese state TV broadcast Monday, Bashar Assad said Damascus was dedicated to implement a Russia-US agreement to surrender its chemical weapons to international control.

He noted that though his government won’t have “any problem” taking experts to sites where the weapons are kept and will allow international experts access to its chemical weapons sites, rebels might block them from reaching some of the locations.

Some places might be difficult to reach due to ongoing fighting or the “local security situation,” the Syrian president added, stressing: “I’m referring to places where militants exist. Those militants might want to stop the experts’ arrival.”

Nevertheless, Assad denounced the United States, France and Britain for submitting a draft resolution to the UN Security Council to place Syrian chemical weapons under international control, saying they were fighting an “imaginary enemy”.

Assad, who was interviewed by China’s state television CCTV in Damascus, the Syrian capital, said he was not concerned about the draft resolution and that China and Russia would “ensure any excuse for military action against Syria will not stand.”

An article posted on the CCTV website on Monday quoted Assad as saying, “I am not concerned. Since its independence, Syria has been committed to all the treaties it has signed. We will honor everything that we have agreed to do.

“And more importantly, I want to say, by submitting the draft to the UN Security Council, or by urging the US and Russia to agree on a deal, the US, France, and Britain are just trying to make themselves winners in a war against a Syria which is their imaginary enemy.”

Russia and the United States brokered the deal to put Assad’s chemical arms stockpiles under international control to avert possible US military strikes that Washington said would punish Assad for a poison gas attack last month.

Washington has blamed Assad’s forces for the attack, which it said killed more than 1,400 people. Assad blamed rebels battling to overthrow him, saying it made no sense for his forces to use chemical weapons when they were gaining the upper hand and while UN chemical inspectors were staying in central Damascus.

Under the US-Russian deal, Assad must account for his chemical weapons stockpiles within a week and see them destroyed by the middle of next year.

Envoys from the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China – met last Thursday for a third straight day to discuss a draft resolution Western powers hope will make the deal legally binding.

Russia, a key ally of Assad, is unhappy with the draft’s references to possible punitive measures against Syria under Article 7 of the UN charter, which talks about UN authorization for sanctions and military force.

In the interview, Assad said gunmen could hinder the access of chemical weapons inspectors to sites where the weapons were stored and made.

He added, “We know that these terrorists are obeying the orders of other countries and these countries do drive these terrorists to commit acts that could get the Syrian government blamed for hindering this agreement.”

Asked whether Syria had lots of chemical weapons, Assad said: “Syria has been manufacturing chemical weapons for decades so it’s normal for there to be large quantities in the country.

“We are a nation at war, we’ve got territories that have been occupied for more than 40 years, but in any case, the Syrian army is trained to fight using conventional weapons.”

He said the chemical weapons were stored “under special conditions to prevent any terrorist for other destructive forces from tampering with them, that is, destructive forces that could come from other countries.”

“So there is nothing to worry about. The chemical weapons in Syria are in a safe place that is secure and under the control of the Syrian army.”

Separately, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi told UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon that China was willing to send experts to help in the Syrian chemical weapons destruction process, and reiterated that a political solution was the only way to solve the crisis in Syria.

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) said on Saturday Syria had handed over information about its chemical weapons arsenal, meeting the first deadline of the disarmament operation.

Russia’s Putin warns of Islamic militant spillover from Syria into ex-Soviet bloc

September 23, 2013

Russia’s Putin warns of Islamic militant spillover from Syria into ex-Soviet bloc | JPost | Israel News.

By REUTERS
09/23/2013 17:18
Assad’s strongest backer, Putin warns ex-Soviet allies, some with Muslim majorities that Syria violence could reach them; Russian officials express fears of Russian-born Islamic militants returning home.

Vladimir Putin speaking at CSTO meeting in Sochi, September 23, 2013.

Vladimir Putin speaking at CSTO meeting in Sochi, September 23, 2013. Photo: Reuters

SOCHI, Russia – Russian President Vladimir Putin warned ex-Soviet allies on Monday that Islamist militancy fuelling the war in Syria could reach their countries, some of which have Muslim majorities.

Russia, which has a large Muslim minority of its own and is fighting an Islamist insurgency, has accused the West of helping militants by seeking Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s removal without paying enough attention to the potential consequences.

Putin told leaders of the six-nation Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) that militants fighting Assad could eventually expand attacks beyond Syria and the Middle East.

“The militant groups (in Syria) did not come out of nowhere, and they will not vanish into thin air,” Putin said.

“The problem of terrorism spilling from one country to another is absolutely real and could directly affect the interests of any one of our countries,” he said, citing the deadly attack on a shopping mall in Nairobi as an example.

“We are now witnessing a terrible tragedy unfold in Kenya. The militants came from another country, as far as we can judge, and are committing horrendous bloody crimes,” Putin said at a CSTO summit in the Russian Black Sea resort city of Sochi.

His words appeared to be a warning about violence spreading from both Syria and Afghanistan, which shares a long border with CSTO member Tajikistan in Central Asia. The security alliance also includes Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia and Belarus.

Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan all have mostly Muslim populations.

Russian officials have expressed concern that Russian-born militants fighting in Syria could return to Russia’s North Caucasus and join an insurgency that claims lives almost daily.

They have also voiced worries that violence could spread into former Soviet Central Asia and Russia after the withdrawal of most Western troops from Afghanistan by the end of next year.

Russia has been one of Syria’s strongest backers in a conflict that has killed more than 100,000 people since it began in March 2011, delivering arms to Assad’s forces and joining China in blocking Western-backed initiatives in the UN Security Council.

Russia, which has echoed Assad’s contention that he is fighting al-Qaida-inspired Islamists rather than a popular revolt against his autocratic rule, has warned the West that military intervention in Syria would play into the hands of the militants.

Decentralized Islamic terror

September 23, 2013

Israel Hayom | Decentralized Islamic terror.

Dr. Reuven Berko

The contours of African nations have been shaped by ethnic and tribal factors, as well as historical influences and geographical and climatic boundaries. The countries of Africa have also been influenced by the colonial and religious heritage, which molded their collective identities in the modern age.

A part of this heritage is buried in the remnants of Christian missions, which bequeathed their legacy to the Christian communities spread across the continent that live alongside Muslim populations. These latter communities, most of which are poor, are undergoing a process of radicalization, fostered by the penetration of and exhortations to religiosity by Islamic proselytizers. These imams belong mainly to al-Qaida-affiliated terrorist organizations, which aspire to seal their occupation of Africa and cement the Islamization of its inhabitants.

This inter-religious struggle — fanned by the Muslim Brotherhood-indoctrinated incitement of religious sheikhs — puts these communities, residing in divided nations and comprising millions of Christians, on the defensive. The events at the shopping center in Nairobi, Kenya are part of a longer chain of terrorist attacks, carried out within the framework of a religious war being waged by al-Qaida-affiliates against Christians to eradicate their communities while simultaneously expanding their control across the African “puzzle.” In the Kenyan case, Somali, Islamist terrorists penetrated deep into the heart of Kenya, which has a majority Christian community living alongside a largely impoverished and embittered Muslim minority.

The murderous fingerprints of the Muslim Brotherhood’s terrorist doctrine — grown on the Egyptian petri dish (and squashed recently by Col. Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi and his people) — pave the way for an advance. Such headway is the ultimate ambition of jihadist organizations, progenies of the Brotherhood, namely to spread across the globe, especially in Asia and Africa. These areas are defined by the Brothers as the “close enemy;” they are a priority for Islamic terror.

Jihadist movements derived from the Muslim Brotherhood are oriented from the beaches of Morocco and North Africa — Libya, Tunisia and Algeria — to Egypt, Jordan, Syria and eventually Turkey; from Sudan and Somalia by way of Yemen and Iraq, all the way to Pakistan and Afghanistan. Each zone is bled once it is decided that it will become an Islamic emirate, ultimately joining the global, Islamic caliphate.

The Muslim Brotherhood doctrine does not need international, centralized leadership to implement its campaign of terror. Like the story of Goethe or creation in the Paul Dukas musical “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice”: each Islamic terrorist is a fragment of the same fractured broom, each operates off the same violent code, all with the same goal: imposing Islam on the world by force.

The African continent is easy prey. Resource-rich states are predisposed to attempts at overthrow by political and economic factors across the globe — by the wealthy and the powerful. Such elements do not shy away from employing corruption and bribery to co-opt Africa’s riches.

Alongside Western governments and massive corporations, remnants of Chinese and Iranian meddling are evident. These countries’ motives — creating chaos — is more hidden than visible.

Everyone is digging rapaciously into the tortured soils of Africa, sweeping them clean of uranium and other damaging materials. They strip the lands of their valuable minerals with the assistance of corrupted ministers from the continent’s poverty-stricken nations. Everyone is celebrating; the Africans are hungry and sick.

Bold mobility in the name of jihad is one of the main characteristics of Islamic terror’s activities. Within the framework of such portability (such as in Syria), al-Shabab, the Somali Islamic terrorist group that launched the attack in Nairobi, struck the Westgate shopping center — which is partly owned by Jews. The Somali president’s evasive statements failed to cover up the terrible aspect of the attack, which is a process of “selection.”

Somali terrorists demand “selection.” They call on their fellow Muslims to pursue and kill Christians and other infidels (Jews). This brings to mind the selection of Jews by former Ugandan President Idi Amin Dada and Palestinians on the eve of Operation Entebbe, or the selection of Jews by Nazis in the extermination camps.

Burning churches in the Middle East — especially in Egypt — underlines this trend of selection. Islamic terror is not content selecting Jews alone. The message to U.S. President Barack Obama is clear: If you flee terrorism, it will follow you home.

By way of deception shalt thou make peace?

September 23, 2013

Israel Hayom | By way of deception shalt thou make peace?.

Boaz Bismuth

Then-President of Iran Mohammad Khatami arrived in Paris in the fall of 1999 to take part in a UNESCO conference. Khatami, who gained a surprise victory in the election two years prior, defeating the ultra-conservative Ali Akbar Nateq-Nouri, drew the most attention when he adopted the slogan “dialogue among civilizations.” He was perceived as the Iranian Mikhail Gorbachev — the leader who was a product of the system, but who would destroy the system.

Hasan Rouhani, Iran’s new president, is currently headed to New York to take part in the annual U.N. General Assembly. He, too, defeated an ultra-conservative candidate — Said Jalili — in the last presidential election. He, too, is drawing the most attention right now. Rouhani, who coordinated Iran’s nuclear program during the Khatami era, is supposed to be the one who will ultimately destroy it, or so the optimistic world hopes. At least partially. As far as the international community is concerned, when it comes to uranium, it is all about the percentages (of enrichment).

It is still unclear what is in store for us as the Iranian festival unfolds at the U.N. headquarters. But one thing is clear: The similarity between Khatami’s Iran and Rouhani’s Iran cannot be denied — at least on the surface; at least judging by what we are hearing. How different, however, is the Islamic republic under the rule of former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad than it is today! It was only yesterday that New York hotels refused to accommodate the affected Holocaust denier Ahmadinejad. Suddenly, New York City is welcoming Iran. Judging by the planned meeting schedule, Rouhani is starting to be seen as the star attraction.

The Iranian economy is in tatters. Rouhani genuinely wants to bring results. There is no doubt that he coordinates every move with Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who is also well aware of the rage on the Iranian streets. They both want to prompt the West to lift sanctions while holding on to their nuclear program. In their minds, it is possible, and they are playing for time.

Not everyone in Iran is enthusiastic about Rouhani’s moderate line. It is enough to observe the reactions of the generals and the commanders of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to understand how difficult it is for Iran to suddenly change its tune. But even if it is all a ruse, everyone has agreed to keep mum and portray a different kind of Iran at the U.N.

In the meantime, the French media is already reporting on the upcoming meeting between Rouhani and French President Francois Hollande — the first meeting between a French president and his Iranian counterpart since Khatami. The British foreign secretary and the EU foreign policy chief are also supposed to meet with Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif — a senior diplomat who speaks Oxford English and once served as ambassador to the U.N. It is safe to assume that by some coincidence, Zarif will also meet with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and the two will not miss an opportunity to shake hands. Just a month ago, the U.S. and France were threatening to launch a military strike on Damascus, and tomorrow we might be in for an Iranian love affair. Everyone wants results, everyone wants photo ops. In a world that fears a bombing of Iran more than an Iranian bomb, anything is possible.

The Persians have always had a gift for sensing diplomatic nuances. They understood very well that Rouhani suits today’s world like a glove. It is not clear what will become of the Iranian nuclear program, but there is no doubt that Rouhani has accurately identified the world’s fears and is likely to coin a new turn of phrase: “By way of deception shalt thou make peace.”

UN General Assembly could see real breakthroughs on peace process, Syria and Iran

September 23, 2013

UN General Assembly could see real breakthroughs on peace process, Syria and Iran | JPost | Israel News.

By MICHAEL WILNER, JERUSALEM POST CORRESPONDENT
09/23/2013 07:19
US is looking at the prospect of diplomatic advances, and, given the stakes, words will finally matter at the upcoming international summit in New York.

Binyamin Netanyahu addresses the UN General Assembly, September 2011.

Binyamin Netanyahu addresses the UN General Assembly, September 2011. Photo: Reuters
NEW YORK – Statesmen descend once again on UN headquarters in New York this week, but the 68th General Assembly might prove different than sessions in the recent past.

After several years of speechifying, sanctioning and pre-negotiating, the United States faces the prospect of real diplomatic breakthroughs on three of the Middle East’s most daunting crises.

Syria’s stunning declaration of its chemical weapons stockpiles and its vow to destroy them, in a deal brokered by Russia to void off US military strikes against the Syrian regime, has reminded Washington of the power of the stick: Even accidentally, the mere threat of military force can disrupt diplomatic stasis, delivering a possible negotiated end to a decades-old problem.

Perhaps so can sanctions, as the Iranian regime signals serious interest in an interim agreement on its nuclear program that will ease economic constraints imposed by the West on their country’s key financial sectors.

And as the crisis over Syria abated, the State Department reminded journalists that Secretary of State John Kerry still considers a final-status agreement between Israel and the Palestinians one of his top priorities. So does US President Barack Obama, who will meet with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas on Tuesday to discuss ongoing direct peace talks.

The coming week is key for all three crises here in New York, making this year’s General Assembly uniquely important. Diplomacy is having its moment in the spotlight, properly highlighted at the UN, a body that rarely proves its mission true that peace can be achieved through dialogue.

Unlike in the past, speeches presented by the presidents of the United States, Iran and the Palestinian Authority will not be aimed primarily at domestic audiences.

They will now be aimed at each other, in a deliberate effort to send messages to adversarial governments of their willingness to negotiate and settle.

The Security Council will face a true test as both Obama and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon publicly challenge its effectiveness after the gassing of over 1,400 civilians in a Damascus suburb in August went unanswered, and effectively ignored, without even a resolution condemning the use of chemical weapons passing through the paralyzed body.

Calls for true reform will likely fall on deaf Russian ears, but a resolution on Syria might finally make its way through the council holding Syrian President Bashar Assad responsible for the destruction of his chemical arms.

Iran’s new president, Hassan Rouhani, will have his first chance to show the US, Israel and the rest of the international community that Iran intends to recognize the Holocaust, the right of Jews to exist in the region without threat of mass attack, and international laws governing the use and limitations of nuclear power. That opportunity cannot go unmissed, with stakes truly high for him both at home and abroad: Conservatives in Iranian politics have been sidelined to give the relative moderate president a chance, and US and Israeli officials have clarified that, after the Syrian crisis, their patience with Iran’s nuclear program is wearing thin as time runs out on alternative options to talks.

Most difficult will be the Israeli- Palestinian conflict, which, compared to the crises posed by Iran and Syria, feels less pressing and has fewer parties directly invested in a swift solution. Nevertheless, this week will be a rare opportunity for the leaders of both peoples to choose words of conciliation over words of aggression; overtures with heft, instead of empty gestures. Whether the Palestinians choose to use this General Assembly to further entrench the conflict with its natural UN allies, or allow the peace process to breathe, will be a major test of its leadership and the faith it has in the talks that are still under way.

Speechifying is guaranteed and outcomes are certainly not. But at this UN gathering, given the stakes and the conditions created by true pressures, the words will finally matter.