Archive for August 26, 2013

Israelis Flock to Gas Mask Distribution Stations

August 26, 2013

Israelis Flock to Gas Mask Distribution Stations – Defense/Security – News – Israel National News.

Requests for gas and chemical mask kits have quadrupled in the wake of increasing tensions in Syria

By David Lev

First Publish: 8/25/2013, 3:45 PM
Gas masks in Israeli school drill (file)

Gas masks in Israeli school drill (file)
Israel news photo: Flash 90

As tensions in Syria rise to unprecedented heights, Israelis, fearful of a possible chemical attack by its northern neighbor, have been flocking to gas mask distribution stations. Distribution of updated masks and chemical protection kits have been going on for several years, but on Sunday hordes of Israelis who have neglected to get their updated kits flocked to post offices, which are responsible for the distribution.

According to the Israel Post Office, requests for kits were quadruple those of a regular Sunday.

Israelis have also been cleaning out safe rooms and neighborhood bomb shelters, most of which serve older neighborhoods where houses were built without safe rooms. In many neighborhoods, the shelters have long been used for community activities, to run after-school programs, or as synagogues. In a recent campaign, the Homefront Security Ministry has been checking the status of shelters and found many of them to be wanting.

Israel, meanwhile, has called for international action to halt the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons. Speaking Sunday, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said that Israel “expects this to end. The most dangerous regimes on earth must not have the most dangerous weapons on earth.”

Speaking with French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius Sunday morning, President Shimon Peres said that “Syria has a ruler who kills people with no compunction, and in a horrible manner. No one can ignore the deaths of children. This is the time for an international effort to remove chemical weapons from Syria. We will not allow those weapons to remain there, not in the hands of Bashar al-Assad, or anyone else,” Peres said.

Syria: air attacks loom as Britain and US pledge to use force within two weeks

August 26, 2013

Syria: air attacks loom as Britain and US pledge to use force within two weeks – Middle East – World – The Independent.

Chemical weapons atrocity in Damascus marks a turning point  for Obama, Cameron and Hollande

Reuters

Western countries, including Britain, are planning to take unilateral military action against the Assad regime within two weeks in retaliation for its alleged use of chemical weapons on civilians in Syria.

David Cameron discussed launching missile strikes against key regime targets during a 40-minute telephone call with President Barack Obama on Saturday night and also with the French President François Hollande on Sunday. While Downing Street said Western powers had not ruled out seeking UN endorsement for military action they added that they were also prepared to unilaterally.

“We cannot in the 21st century allow the idea that chemical weapons can be used with impunity and there are no consequences,” the Foreign Secretary William Hague said. A Downing Street source added: “We intend to show that an attack of this nature will not pass without a serious response.”

Mr Cameron is expected to cut short his holiday in Cornwall and return to London to chair a meeting of the Government’s National Security Council tomorrow.  Downing Street said that the Prime Minister was also considering the recall of Parliament but added that it “all depends upon the timing”. Labour said it would expect” a recall “in advance of any decision being made”.

Any military action is likely to take the form of missile strikes from American naval forces in the region, which were ordered to move closer to Syria on Saturday.

Today, the new head of the UK armed forces General Sir Nick Houghton will meet with General Lloyd Austin, the US commander in the Middle East in Jordon. The pair are attending a pre-planned meeting of defence chiefs but are expected to discuss the planned action and possible targets “at the fringes” of the conference.

Government sources said it was too early to say whether British military personnel would take part in any of the attacks but would provide complete political support. “We are clear that there needs to be a serious response and our level of involvement is therefore clear on the political level,” they said. “On the military level it will be driven by operationally by what is needed.”

News of the planned attacks came on the day that Syria finally agreed to let UN inspectors visit the scene of the alleged chemical weapons attack, which the charity Médecins Sans Frontières said had killed around 350 people and left 3,600 needing treatment for “neurotoxic symptoms”.

However, Washington said the move was “too little, too late” and accused the Syrian government of having “something to hide” and delaying access for four days to cover up evidence.

The Western response it unlikely to be long lasting and is expected to consist of limited air strikes on key targets. It will allow Mr Obama to insist that America is capable and willing to take action over the use of chemical weapons which last year he described as a “red line” for the administration.

However, there are fears that any strike will inevitably drag the West further into the Syrian conflict and could lead to retaliation or terrorist attacks in the region either from Syria or its Iranian supporters. It is also likely to lead to condemnation from Russia and make any internationally brokered settlement that much harder. Significantly the Government said discussions with Russia over the response to the chemical weapons attack had so far only been at a “senior official” level.

A Downing Street source said that Mr Cameron would speak again to the American President either today or tomorrow and would also be engaging with other key European allies. He said: “If the Assad regime were innocent they wouldn’t have stopped UN inspectors from coming and they would have stopped shelling the area.

“Therefore we are into a scenario of, not has there been an incident and does the international community need to respond, but how should the international community respond? This is where our focus now is.

“The aim here is to have a clear, concrete response from the international community that deters further outrages and makes clear that we will stand up to the prohibition of chemical weapons. We need to show that their use will not go unchecked.”

Asked about getting a UN mandate from military action they said: “We are not excluding the UN route and we will keep engaging with UN partners and working the diplomatic machine. But we do not want the regime or its allies to use the UN to drag this all out. An attack of this nature passes without a serious response.”

They added that any attack would not be intended to sway the military balance between Assad forces and they Syrian opposition. “This is not about trying to shape the outcome of the Syrian conflict by military means. This is focused on the incident that happened on Wednesday.”

Mr Cameron may hope that the limited nature of the planned response may help him avoid having to hold a pre-emptive vote on military action in Parliament where he could face strong opposition not just from Labour but also his own backbenches who are concerned about the UK being increasing dragged into yet another Middle Eastern conflict.

A Downing Street spokesman said that Mr Cameron had “always been clear that MPs should have a chance to debate this type of issue” but he added: “He reserves the right for the Government to act and respond.”

However Douglas Alexander MP, Labour’s shadow Foreign Secretary said: “If the Prime Minister is now considering military options involving UK personnel then of course I would expect him to seek a recall of Parliament and to come to the House of Commons.”

Assad seen unlikely to hit at Israel if attacked

August 26, 2013

Assad seen unlikely to hit at Israel if attacked | The Times of Israel.

Rebels vow they’ll gain control of Syrian chemical weapons stockpiles

August 25, 2013, 9:52 pm
Israel's Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz looks across Israel's border with Syria, in May. (photo credit: IDF Spokesperson)

Israel’s Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz looks across Israel’s border with Syria, in May. (photo credit: IDF Spokesperson)

Jerusalem does not believe the Assad regime would retaliate against Israel if it were hit by the United States in the wake of last Wednesday’s alleged use of chemical weapons.

A Syrian analyst, Bil’al Mekdad, warned on Syrian television Sunday that the United States “may be about to make a foolish mistake” and strike at Syria in response to the alleged chemical weapons attack by forces loyal to President Bashar Assad, which killed hundreds of civilians outside Damascus last week. If the regime were attacked, he said, it would hit back “directly” against Israel, because “it is the hand of Israel that steers America.”

Nonetheless, Israeli military sources indicated they did not consider that scenario likely, Israel’s Channel 2 news reported. “Israel’s estimation is that Assad would not retaliate against Israel,” the report said, stressing that Israel was taking various unspecified security precautions just in case.

Were Assad to strike at Israel, he would be unlikely to survive the forceful Israeli response, the report said, and this had been clarified to Assad.

Israeli media analysts noted that although some Syrian commentators have directly threatened Israel, no such threats had been made to date by senior government officials in Damascus.

Syrian rebel spokesmen on Sunday, meanwhile, vowed to gain control of Assad’s chemical weapons stockpiles, saying they had only refrained from doing so thus far because of the desire to avoid “plunging the country into chaos.” After last Wednesday’s events, however, they said in a video announcement, there was no longer any reason to hold back.

Rebel forces were reported to be seeking to advance toward one such chemical weapons depot east of Aleppo, without much success as of Sunday night.

Israel has repeatedly expressed concern over Assad’s chemical weapons falling into even more dangerous hands than those of the Syrian president.

UN experts to hunt for chemical shell shrapnel – as West poised to strike Syria this week

August 26, 2013

UN experts to hunt for chemical shell shrapnel – as West poised to strike Syria this week.

DEBKAfile Special Report August 26, 2013, 9:51 AM (IDT)
Chemical shell shrapnel

Chemical shell shrapnel

Six days after the event, a United Nations team of experts Monday, Aug. 26, start scouring a site in eastern Damascus for shrapnel left over from the poison gas shells or rockets fired by the Syrian army’s 155th Brigade last Wednesday.

Given the low prospects of finding evidence at this late date, debkafile’s sources report that the UN Secretariat and the White House in Washington agreed Sunday night that the only chance of the chemical weapons experts finding evidence of their use was to examine one of the targeted sites or injured victims. The Assad regime has only offered to open one site to the UN team, not grant them access to the approximately 2,000 victims under treatment at the three hospitals. Therefore, the inspectors’ best bet was to go for shell shrapnel first.

Even after the alleged Syrian army’s exhaustive cleanup operation after its poison chemical attack, the UN experts still hope to turn up overlooked fragments, however microscopic.

The US and UN also agreed that the experts would submit their initial findings as soon as Tuesday or Wednesday morning, Aug. 28. The Obama administration made clear that it was not prepared to hang around and wait for the results of more extensive tests. The assumption in Washington is that the initial UN findings would suffice as the starting signal for the US and its allies, Britain, France, Canada, Turkey, and Germany, to go forward and launch planned targeted strikes on Syria.

Notwithstanding the official statements coming out of Washington that President Barack Obama has still not decided on his military options against Syria’s chemical attack, debkafile’s sources confirm that limited, targeted Western military action is scheduled for the coming week.

The position of the Gulf emirates and Saudi Arabia is less cut and dried. Riyadh doesn’t want a targeted strike but an early all-out offensive for overthrowing the Assad regime once and for all.

This opens up the possibility of a separate Saudi-Qatari-UAE assault in Syria, coordinated with Washington, but conducted in different regions from those targeted by the US-led lineup.
The result is potentially the pursuit of a broad-based pan-Arab offensive on the Syrian regime, alongside a surgical Western strike.
As the moment of reckoning for his regime approaches, Bashar Assad said Monday, Aug. 26 in an interview with the Russian Izvestia that a US attack on his country would end in “failure.”
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said he was deeply concerned over possible US action in Syria.

Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu commented that what is happening in Syria simply demonstrates what will happen if Iran gets even deadlier weapons. He told the weekly cabinet meeting that Israel’s “finger is on the pulse” of the situation in Syria and – if need be – its finger would move to the trigger.

Arab media push for US intervention in Syria

August 26, 2013

Arab media push for US intervention in Syria | JPost | Israel News.

08/26/2013 06:47
Gulf backed pan-Arab media leads media blitz; articles focus on shaming Obama into action using moral arguments.

A US Navy destroyer launches a cruise missile in the Mediterranean Sea [file]

A US Navy destroyer launches a cruise missile in the Mediterranean Sea [file] Photo: REUTERS

Arab media calls from the Sunni world for US intervention in Syria are at a fever pitch since pictures circulated last week of victims of an alleged Syrian chemical weapons attack. The Gulf backed pan-Arab media lead the media blitz.

The articles before and especially after the alleged Syrian chemical attack focus on shaming US president Barack Obama into action using moral arguments. The other kind of article that has appeared is one that shows Saudi Arabia as valiant for standing up to the US for its support for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, for its lack of support for the Syrian rebels, and for leaving it to face the Syria/Iran/Hezbollah axis alone.

In an article on Friday in the Saudi backed Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat, Haitham al-Maleh writes that “the Syrian revolution remains without real allies.”

He says that the West is equivocating on whether to come to the Syrians’ aid, but has still done nothing.

“No one in the world is willing to lend a hand. Everyone is discussing whether or not to provide military and humanitarian aid,” says Maleh.

He goes on to add that the Syrians are left alone to fight against Iran, Hezbollah, the Houthis (from Yemen), and Iraqi Shi’ites. And all the while “the West finds pretexts to refrain from arming the rebels,” such as the claim that radicals are part of the opposition.

“The West resorts to these pretexts to refrain from arming the rebels, ignoring the daily bloodletting of Syrians,” he says.

Saudi backed Al-Arabiya ran an article on Sunday by Faisal J. Abbas, which mentioned how Obama ignored his own red line over the use of chemical weapons by Assad’s regime. But in reality this is not the real issue, he says. The real issue is that far more people – over 100,000 – have been killed without the use of chemical weapons.

“Is the loss of life less significant when people are tortured to death in prisons, run over by tanks or fired at by Syrian regime fighter-jets?” he writes adding that despite this, intervention now would be “better late than never.”

Writing in the popular London-based Arab daily Al-Hayat on Sunday, Mostafa Zein is cynical about Obama’s motives for not intervening.

He writes that Obama is only interested in supporting his country’s interests and the current “chaos spreading in the Middle East secures such interests, without him having to pay a single dollar or lose a single soldier.”

The other argument presents Saudi Arabia as standing up against the Syria/Iran/Hezbollah axis and supporting the Syrian rebels without the required aid from the West.

Asharq al-Awsat ran an article by Abdul Rahman al-Rashed on Sunday, which was also reposted on the website of Al-Arabiya, arguing that Saudi Arabia is “surrounded” by enemies.

“As for Riyadh, the situation has become dreadful. Khomeini’s Iran is east of it, the Brotherhood’s Egypt was riding the Iranian wave west of it and Iranian Maliki’s Iraq is north of it. It’s a siege surrounding Saudi Arabia like never before in the region’s history,” writes Rashed.

He goes on to note that the failure of the Syrian rebels means that Iran is allowed to dominate the region through various countries: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, Egypt and Sudan. And the Saudis have been brave in confronting the challenge: “This is something that is impossible for Saudi Arabia to give in to, no matter how much tensions it would cause in its relations with the US.”

Michael Young, writing on the NOW Lebanon website, states that it is possible that at some point “the Obama administration will grasp the devastating impact of the fact that it has undermined in just five years the central role the United States played in the Middle East for over six decades, and that this will lead it to respond militarily in Syria.”

He notes that Saudi Arabia and other Gulf States stepped in to aid the Egyptian army after threats to cut off US aid began emanating from Washington. And in Syria, the Saudis are also taking the lead.

He goes on to conclude: “America has rarely seemed so indolent in the face of barbarism. Is Assad right in expecting no better than empty posturing from Washington? Or will the most overrated of American presidents be shamed into action, if only to salvage his collapsing reputation?”

Assad rejects chemical weapons allegations, warns US against attack

August 26, 2013

Assad rejects chemical weapons allegations, warns US against attack | JPost | Israel News.

By REUTERS, JPOST.COM STAFF
08/26/2013 08:38
Syrian president tells Russian paper that claims he used chemical weapons are politically motivated; warns Washington against striking Syria: “Failure awaits the United States as in all previous wars it has unleashed.”

Syria's President Bashar Assad

Syria’s President Bashar Assad Photo: REUTERS

MOSCOW – Syrian President Bashar Assad dismissed Western allegations that he used chemical weapons as politically motivated and warned Washington any US military intervention would fail in an interview published in a Russian newspaper on Monday.

“Failure awaits the United States as in all previous wars it has unleashed, starting with Vietnam and up to the present day,” he told the Izvestia daily when asked what would happen if Washington decided to strike or invade Syria.

Assad said Syrian government forces had been close to where rebel forces say chemical weapons were used last week during the country’s more than two-year-old civil war.

“Would any state use chemical or any other weapons of mass destruction in a place where its own forces are concentrated? That would go against elementary logic,” Assad told Izvestia, a pro-Kremlin newspaper.

Russia has been Assad’s most important international ally throughout the civil war, supplying his troops with arms and resisting pressure at the United Nations for tighter sanctions on Damascus.

Asked about the arms deliveries, Assad said: “I want to say that all contracts that have been concluded with Russia are being fulfilled.”

He gave no details and did not say whether Damascus had taken delivery of advanced S-300 sir defense systems from Russia which could vastly enhance its defense capabilities.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry said Monday that it is very concerned that Washington may respond militarily to the suspected chemical weapons attack by Syria’s government.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov urged restraint when talking to his US counterpart, John Kerry, the ministry said on Monday.

“The minister (Lavrov) stressed that the official announcements from Washington in recent days about the readiness of US armed forces to ‘intervene’ in the Syrian conflict have been received in Moscow with deep concern,” the foreign ministry said in a statement, referring to a conversation on Sunday.

The Times of London reported Monday that British Prime Minister David Cameron has allegedly been pressuring US President Barack Obama to launch a prompt military strike on Syria in response to the supposed chemical weapons attack.

British government sources said talks between Western leaders were ongoing and that any agreed upon military action could be exercised in the coming week.

US rebuffs Syrian access to chemical site as “too late to be credible”

August 26, 2013

US rebuffs Syrian access to chemical site as “too late to be credible”.

DEBKAfile Special Report August 25, 2013, 7:46 PM (IDT)
US seaborne Tomahawk cruise missile

US seaborne Tomahawk cruise missile

The US has little doubt the Syrian government used chemical weapons against civilians and any decision to open the site to UN inspectors comes “too late to be credible,” a senior US official said Sunday, Aug. 25.
The official made clear the Syrian government’s agreement to let United Nations inspectors visit the site of an alleged chemical weapons attack was inadequate.

“At this juncture, any belated decision by the regime to grant access to the UN team would be considered too late to be credible, including because the evidence available has been significantly corrupted as a result of the regime’s persistent shelling and other intentional actions over the last five days,” the official said.

“If the Syrian government had nothing to hide and wanted to prove to the world that it had not used chemical weapons in this incident, it would have ceased its attacks on the area and granted immediate access to the UN five days ago,” the senior Obama administration official said.
The White House appeared not to be deterred from military intervention by an effort by Damascus to ease tensions by allowing UN inspectors to finally visit the areas allegedly hit with chemical weapons.
Middle East tensions were further ratcheted up during the day by a warning from Tehran. Gen. Massoud Jazayeri, deputy chief of staff of Iran’s armed forces said Sunday: “America knows the limitation of the red line of the Syrian front and any crossing of Syria’s red line will have severe consequences for the White House.”  Iranian and Syrian spokesmen have said that a US attack on Syria would prompt a Syrian missile attack on Israel in retaliation.
The Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman also issued a statement late Sunday saying: “We again resolutely urge all those who are trying to force conclusions on the UN experts and who say that armed action against Syria is possible, to show common sense and avoid tragic mistakes.”
debkafile reported early Sunday morning:

Western and Middle East powers led by Washington began moving Saturday night and Sunday morning, Aug. 25, toward a first strike against Syria following the Assad regime’s large-scale chemical attack in eastern Damascus last Wednesday. The first targeted strike may well signal the start of a series of US-led attacks aimed at toppling the Assad regime, debkafile’s military sources report. They may consist of imposing a no-fly zone and the sealing off of sectors in northern and southern Syria against government forces.

Russian forces also went on war alert
President Barack Obama and UK Prime Minister David Cameron spent 40 minutes on the phone Saturday night amid the strongest indications to date from Washington that direct military intervention by the West was approaching, following a change in the US president’s posture. He has become convinced that the strike would have to be conducted outside the United Nations.

Military commanders from Western and Muslim countries are meeting Sunday in the Jordanian capital of Amman to coordinate action in Syria, with the participation of the US, Britain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, France, Italy and Canada. Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the US Chiefs of Staff chairs the meeting. Saturday night, four American destroyers were moving closer to Syria, armed with Tomahawk cruise missiles, which are capable of precision strikes.
While Western media are reporting at length on Western, Arab and Muslim military preparations, Israel’s armed forces are moving ahead in secrecy. Its officials spread soothing statements asserting Israel’s non-involvement in the Syrian turmoil, as Israel’s military and intelligence agencies get ready for Syria to counter an attack by loosing missiles against their country as well as Jordan and Turkey. All three also expect an explosion of terrorism.
Saturday night, Syrian information minister Omran al-Zoubi, while denying his government was responsible for Wednesday’s poison gas attack, stated over state television that if Syria came under attack, “a mass of flames will ignite the Middle East.”
debkafile’s military sources report that Moscow has placed on war alert Russia’s Mediterranean and Black Sea fleets as well as rapid deployment forces in southern and central Russia.

Three Syrian hospitals told the humanitarian group Médecins Sans Frontières Saturday that they had received around 3,600 patients suffering from symptoms related to a poison gas attack. Of these, 355 had reportedly died.
According to debkafile’s sources, Western demands for proof of the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons before taking action have been countered in the last few hours by the discovery that the forensic evidence will be all but impossible to obtain in view of the special mixture contained in the gas shells. Only tiny quantities of sarin were blended in with a large quantity of riot control agents, a formula developed by Iran to camouflage the use of chemical weapons.

Russia urges calm, but US says Syria chemical probe too late

August 26, 2013

Russia urges calm, but US says Syria chemical probe too late | The Times of Israel.

Moscow calls on West to await results of UN inspection of alleged gas attack site before military action, even as capitals say mounting evidence Assad regime to blame

August 26, 2013, 12:50 am Bodies being buried after the chemical attack in Damascus last week. (photo credit: AP/Shaam News Network)

Bodies being buried after the chemical attack in Damascus last week. (photo credit: AP/Shaam News Network)

The US believes the Syrian regime’s allowing of a UN chemical weapons inspection team to probe the site of an alleged attack is too little too late, even as Moscow has urged Washington and its allies to await the team’s findings before launching military action.

Moscow welcomed Syria’s decision to allow international experts to examine the area in a Damascus suburb where at least 100 people died in the suspected attack last week. Syrian and UN officials are working to finalize the timing of the visit.

However, a senior US official said the White House believes the Syrian government had denied the UN investigative team immediate access to the site in order to give the evidence of the attack time to degrade.

The official said the regime’s continuing shelling of the site also further corrupts any available evidence of the attack.

The Obama administration official said a belated decision to grant access to the UN team would be considered “too late to be credible.”

“At this juncture, any belated decision by the regime to grant access to the UN team would be considered too late to be credible, including because the evidence available has been significantly corrupted as a result of the regime’s persistent shelling and other intentional actions over the last five days,” the official told the Reuters news agency.

Washington and a number of Western European countries appear to be moving toward a decision to launch military action against the embattled regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

On Sunday, a rebel official said opposition forces had received word that a coalition of Western states had made the decision to strike, according to Israel Radio.

Republican Sen. Bob Corker called Sunday for the US to respond in a “surgical and proportional way, something that gets their attention.” The Tennessee lawmaker said conversations with administration officials led him to believe US president Barack Obama would approach Congress for authorization to launch a strike after the summer recess next month.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said however that all countries should wait for the results of the investigation and he encouraged other countries to “show prudence and avoid tragic mistakes” by rushing to a conclusion about the incident.

“Our American and European partners must understand what catastrophic consequences this kind of politics would have for the region, for the Arab and Islamic world as a whole,” Lukashevich said, advising the US and its allies against taking a “gamble” and using unilateral force in Syria.

Opposition figures say an early morning attack on Wednesday released chemical agents into neighborhoods east of Damascus, killing hundreds. Some rebel groups put the death toll at over 1,000 while Doctors Without Borders said Saturday that 355 people were killed and over 3,000 injured. The regime has denied carrying out the attack.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle spoke with UN disarmament chief Angela Kane about the agreement between the UN and Syria to allow experts to visit the site.

“This is an important agreement in a dramatic situation,” Westerwelle said in a statement. “I welcome that the examination will begin without delay.”

On Sunday, France and the US both said evidence suggested chemical weapons were used. Obama met with his national security team Saturday to assess the intelligence and consider a US military response, with US warships sent into the eastern Mediterranean.

Before the announcement of the UN-Syria agreement, British Prime Minister David Cameron and French President Francois Hollande discussed the situation in a telephone call Sunday morning.

“They agreed that a chemical weapons attack against the Syrian people on the scale that was emerging demanded a firm response from the international community,” a British government spokesman said on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to identify himself publicly. “This crime must not be swept under the carpet.”

In Paris, Hollande said a “body of evidence” suggests that chemical weapons were used during attacks on a Damascus suburb that killed hundreds, and that Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime was most likely behind it. In a statement from his office, Hollande said “everything” leads France to believe the regime was behind the attack.

At the same time a White House official said there was “very little doubt” that chemical weapons had been used, with Washington basing its assessment on “the reported number of victims, reported symptoms of those who were killed or injured” and witness accounts.

Francois Heisbourg, a special adviser at the Paris-based Foundation for Strategic Research think tank, said that Syrian authorities “may have actually come to believe that there is a risk of some American strike” — and thus agreed to let the inspectors visit the suspected site.

“Whether [Syrian authorities] came to that view on their own, or whether the Russians told them to become a bit more careful, I don’t know, but it certainly looks as if they were actually starting to take the Americans seriously,” he added. “I think the Syrians are getting scared.”

Even without Western military action, rebels forces are already enjoying increased support in the wake of the chemical attack, with reports of 400 tons of Gulf-financed arms being sent from Turkey to northern based opposition fighters over the past day, Reuters reported.

The shipment would be one of the biggest arms transfers to the rebels in the two-and-a-half year-old civil war, which has claimed the lives of over 100,000 people and made over 7 million people into refugees.