Archive for July 21, 2013

Iran opposes Israeli-Palestinian peace talks

July 21, 2013

Iran opposes Israeli-Palestinian peace talks – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson predicts ‘Zionist regime’ will not agree to withdraw from territories, not ready to pay price for peace

AFP

Published: 07.21.13, 17:18 / Israel News

Iran on Sunday voiced opposition to a US-mediated resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, predicting the Jewish state would never agree to withdraw from occupied territories.

Tehran “along with Palestinian groups expresses its opposition to the proposed plan and it’s certain that the occupying Zionist regime will utterly not agree to withdraw from the occupied lands,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Araqchi said, quoted by Iranian media.

“Past experience shows that the occupying Zionist regime is basically not ready to pay the price for peace since war mongering and occupation lie at its very core,” he added.

US Secretary of State John Kerry announced on Friday that Israeli and Palestinian negotiators had agreed to meet to prepare a resumption of direct peace talks, stalled since 2010. The exact basis for Kerry’s plan remains unknown.

The last round of direct talks between the two sides nearly three years ago broke down over the issue of Israeli settlement building in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned ministers on Sunday that renewed peace talks with the Palestinians would be tough, and he said any draft treaty would be put to a referendum.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has repeatedly stressed that his demands for a freeze to Israeli settlement building and the release of prisoners held by Israel must be met before talks can resume.

The Iran-backed Islamist movement Hamas which runs the Gaza Strip rejected a return to talks, saying Abbas had no legitimate right to negotiate on behalf of the Palestinian people.

Iran rules out a two-state solution and has its own vision of how to resolve the six-decade-old conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

“The end of occupation … self-determination for the Palestinians, the return of all refugees to their ancestral land, and the creation of an integrated Palestine with Al-Quds (Jerusalem) as its capital,” Araqchi reiterated.

Germany backs away from EU settlement directives

July 21, 2013

Germany backs away from EU settlement directives | JPost | Israel

By BENJAMIN WEINTHAL, JERUSALEM POST CORRESPONDENT
07/20/2013 21:14
Merkel’s Bundestag spokesman says guidelines are “pure ideology and symbolic politics,” and will not help peace.

e1 stop 521

e1 stop 521 Photo: Ammar Awad/Reuters

Germany distances itself from the “controversial European Union guidelines” banning cooperation with Israeli entities beyond the Green Line, a foreign policy spokesman in the Bundestag announced on Friday.

In a statement issued by MP Philipp Missfedler, the Bundestag spokesman for German chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union party and its coalition partner the Bavarian Christian Social Union, he stated the guidelines are “pure ideology and symbolic politics” and will not contribute to finding a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Missfelder stated it is encouraging that the Federal Government has moved away from the new EU directives, which declared that from January 1 2014, Israeli projects in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, east Jerusalem and the Golan Heights will no longer be given European Union financial backing.

He added that the European regulations are not “objective requirements” because over the last seven years of the approximately 800 million Euros of financial aid from Brussels to Israel, only 0.5% was funneled into projects covering the disputed territories.

“Israel is the recognized administrative power in the territories without which approved development projects like solar energy or sewage works could not be installed,” Missfelder stated.

He continued that an implementation of the new EU guidelines could mean an “end of research cooperation with the Hebrew University in Jerusalem because some of their academics have an address in East Jerusalem.”

It is unclear if the German position will reverse the EU action and lead to backtracking among other countries within the 28 member EU body.

Missfelder said the EU guidelines have a similar quality to the recent legislative initiative of the Green Party in the Bundestag to label products from the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem.

The Green Party legislative initiative also fails to contribute to a” constructive solution of the conflict in the Palestinian territories,” said Missfelder.

He added that “instead of issuing statements hostile to Israel, the Green Party faction should concentrate on a solution to the essential questions of the Middle East conflict: Israel’s right to exist, an end to terrorism and fundamentalist violence, as well as the creation of a foundation for a two state solution, with final borders for both states.”

Missfelder’s disavowal of the product labeling measure appears to contradict Germany’s Ambassador to Israel, Andreas Michaelis, who defended in a June Jerusalem Post opinion article labeling Israeli products made in the West Bank.

“EU consumer protection law sets very detailed requirements for retail labeling.They exist to provide a level playing field for trade across Europe and to inform consumers on the origin of products,” wrote Michaelis.

Jewish organizations such as the Wiesenthal Center and the prominent German-Jewish journalist Henryk M.Broder declared the product labeling measure to be a de-facto boycott of Israeli merchandise, which recalls the Hitler movement’s boycott of Jewish businesses.

Michaelis, however, wrote, “Neither are we in the business of calling for boycotts.”

The German Greens have come under fire because of their aggressive legislative push to label Israeli products. The Neo-Nazi NPD party issued a similar demarcation measure to the Green Party in a East German state legislature last year. The Green party deputy Kerstin Müller played a critical role in the initiative targeting Israeli settlement products. She is slated to take over the reins of the German Green Party’s Heinrich Böll foundation office in Tel Aviv later this year.

“Obviously, a person who played a leading role in this initiative is uniquely unsuitable to represent the Böll Foundation in Israel, but perhaps they have an opening available in Ramallah,” Efraim Zuroff , the head of the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Jerusalem office, told the Jerusalem Post last month.

Müller has faced intense criticism over the last three years from Germany’s Jewish community. The Central Council of Jews in Germany said in 2010 Müller displays an “intolerably paternalistic tone” toward Israel and toward Jews in Germany. That year, she supported an anti-Israel parliamentary resolution and attacked the council in a letter because its leadership criticized the resolution. The resolution rebuked Israel for its interception of the Turkish vessel Mavi Marmara, which tried to break Israel’s legal blockade of the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip.

The head of the Berlin Jewish community, Dr. Gideon Joffe, said in June that Müller’s conduct is anti-Semitic because she singled out only the Jewish state for product labeling.

“Kerstin Müller is an experienced foreign policy politician and with her longtime involvement in German-Israeli relations and the Middle East peace process make her an ideal representative for the foundation in Tel Aviv,” Ralf Fücks, the head of the Heinrich-Böll Foundation, wrote the Post in an email response.

Prof. Gerald Steinberg, from the Jerusalem-based watchdog group NGO Monitor, told the Post at the time that“The Heinrich Böll Foundation irresponsibly channels German taxpayer funds to some causes and organizations that promote political warfare against Israel.”.

He cited the Greens support for “such radical Palestinian groups as the Applied Research Institute in Jerusalem.”

Michael Schroeren, spokesman for the Green party faction in the Bundestag, rejected the criticisms leveled at Müller.

News.