Archive for June 29, 2013

U.S urges dialogue as Egypt braces for protests; American Jewish student killed in Alexandria

June 29, 2013

U.S urges dialogue as Egypt braces for protests; American Jewish student killed in Alexandria – Middle East – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

Protest organizers say 22 million Egyptian signed petition to remove president Morsi; Andrew Pochter, 21, of Chevy Chase, Maryland, was stabbed to death on Friday.

By Reuters, and | Jun.29, 2013 | 5:50 PM
Egypt protests

A scene of the aftermath of a fire in Sedy Gaber in Alexandria, June 28, 2013; in small frame: Andrew Pochter of Chevy Chase, Maryland. Photo by AP, Reuters

U.S. President Barack Obama called on Egypt‘s government and opposition on Saturday to engage each other in constructive dialogue and prevent violence spilling out across the region.

Political violence on Friday killed three people, including an American Jewish college student, and mass rallies are planned for Sunday aimed at unseating Islamist President Mohamed Morsi. Obama said he was “looking at the situation with concern.”

Hundreds have been wounded and at least eight killed in street fighting for over a week as political deadlock deepens.

The U.S. citizen who was killed Friday was Andrew Pochter, 21, of Chevy Chase, Maryland. Pochter, who was active in his college’s Hillel, died after being stabbed in the chest in the coastal city of Alexandria.

A statement on a Facebook page entitled “R.I.P Andrew Driscoll Pochter”, which appeared to have been posted by his family, said Pochter had travelled to Alexandria for the summer to teach English to 7- and 8-year-old Egyptian children and to improve his Arabic.

The page had also been posted on by colleagues of Pochter at the U.S. educational non-profit organization where he was working.

The family statement read: “He went to Egypt because he cared profoundly about the Middle East, and he planned to live and work there in the pursuit of peace and understanding.”

The youth group leading the campaign against Egypt’s president says it has collected the signatures of 22 million Egyptians who want to remove the Islamist leader.

Mahmoud Badr, a leader of the Tamarod, or rebel, movement said Saturday that 22,134,460 Egyptians have signed the petition demanding Morsi’s ouster.

Badr did not say whether there had been an independent audit of the signatures. Morsi’s supporters have long questioned the authenticity of the collected signatures.”Every party has to denounce violence,” Obama said at the other end of Africa, in Pretoria. “We’d like to see the opposition and President Morsi engage in a more constructive conversation about how they move their country forward because nobody is benefiting from the current stalemate.” He added that it was “challenging, given there is not a tradition of democracy in Egypt.”

Morsi’s critics hope millions will march on Sunday when he marks a year in power to demand new elections. They accuse his Muslim Brotherhood of hijacking the revolution of 2011 and using its electoral majorities to monopolize power.

“Egypt is the largest country in the Arab world,” Obama said. “The entire region is concerned that, if Egypt continues with this constant instability, that has adverse effects more broadly.” U.S. missions would be protected, he said. Last year, a consulate in Libya was overrun and Americans killed.

The Egyptian army, heavily funded by Washington since before Hosni Mubarak was overthrown, is on alert. It warned politicians it may step in if they lose control of the streets – an outcome some in the diffuse opposition coalition may quietly welcome, but to which Morsi’s Islamist allies might respond with force.

It is unclear how big the rallies will be or when they may start. Protest organizers said on Saturday a petition calling on Mursi to quit had 22 million signatures – over 40 percent of the electorate and 7 million more than they announced 10 days ago.

The figure could not be verified, but independent analysts say there is a real prospect of very large demonstrations.

Some few thousand activists in Cairo were camping out at rival centers on Saturday. There was no sign of renewed trouble.

Several offices of Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood were attacked on Friday, including one in Alexandria where two men died, including 21-year-old American Andrew Procter. In Port Said on the Suez Canal, a home-made hand grenade killed a protester and wounded 15. The Health Ministry said 236 people were injured on Friday.

The U.S. embassy evacuated non-essential staff and warned citizens to avoid Egypt. An airport source said dozens of U.S. personnel and their families left Cairo for Germany on Saturday.

The U.S. ambassador has angered liberals by saying Morsi was legitimately elected and that protests may be counter-productive for an economy crippled by unrest that has cut tourism revenues.

In the capital, Islamist supporters were still camped outside a suburban mosque where they had gathered in the many thousands on Friday to vent anger and fear over a return of army-backed rule. Some speakers also urged reconciliation.

On Tahrir Square, seat of the uprising of early 2011, flags and tents formed a base camp for protesters. They hoped for millions on the streets under slogans accusing Morsi and the Brotherhood of hijacking the revolution against Hosni Mubarak to entrench their own rule. A rally was also planned outside the presidential palace, where some had already taken up position.

With short supplies of fuel adding to long-standing economic woes, many said they would turn out on Sunday, when Morsi marks his first year in office as Egypt’s first ever freely elected leader, to demand a new president who can bring them prosperity.

Liberal opposition leaders dismissed an offer of cooperation from Mursi this week as too little too late. The Brotherhood, which says at least five of its supporters have been killed in days of street fighting, accuses liberals of allying with those loyal to Mubarak to mount a coup against the electoral process.

The opposition says the Brotherhood are trying to monopolize power, Islamize a diverse society and throttle dissent. They cite as evidence Morsi’s broadsides against critical media and legal proceedings launched against journalists and satirists.

“Mursi is no longer the legitimate president of Egypt,” Mohamed Abdelaziz, a protest organizer, told a news conference where others called for peaceful sit-ins to last until Morsi made way for an interim administration led by a senior judge.

“Come June 30, the people will run Egypt!” chanted people attending the event. The opposition, which has lost a series of elections, wants to reset the rules that emerged in a messy process of army and then Islamist rule since early 2011.

Egypt’s leading religious authority warned of the risk of “civil war” after violence in the past week that left several dead and hundreds injured. The clerics backed Morsi’s offer to talk to opposition groups before Sunday’s protests.

A senior figure at Cairo’s Al-Azhar institute said Sunday should be a day of “community dialogue and civilized expression of opinion”, a “catalyst” for political leaders to understand their national duty – and the “dangerous alternative.”

Senior Brotherhood figure Essam el-Erian was dismissive of middle-class protest organizers in a Facebook post: “Millions of farmers will wake early, perform their morning prayers and go to their fields to harvest food for the people,” he wrote.

Warning again that Mubarak-era “thugs” would spread violence among peaceful protesters, he said government would continue: “President Mohamed Morsi will go to his office tomorrow to sign new planning and budget laws for the new financial year.”

Off Topic: Jewish college student stabbed to death in Egypt protests

June 29, 2013

Jewish college student stabbed to death in Egypt protests | The Times of Israel.

21-year-old Andrew Pochter, an intern at an educational NGO, killed in Alexandria as he watched clashes

June 29, 2013, 3:24 pm
21-year-old Andrew Pochter, the American college student who was killed in Alexandria on Friday, June 28, 2013. (photo credit: Facebook)

21-year-old Andrew Pochter, the American college student who was killed in Alexandria on Friday, June 28, 2013. (photo credit: Facebook)

An American Jewish college student, Andrew Driscoll Pochter, 21, a native of Chevy Chase, Maryland, was killed in Alexandria, Egypt on Friday as he watched clashes between supporters and opponents of the country’s Islamist president, it was confirmed Saturday.

Pochter, one of three people killed in Friday’s clashes, was stabbed to death by a protester, his family said.

Originally reported to have been an employee of the American cultural center in Alexandria, Pochter was later identified by his parents and university, Ohio’s Kenyon College, as an intern at AMIDEAST, a nonprofit organization devoted to promoting education in the Middle East and North Africa.

“Our beloved 21-year-old son and brother Andrew Driscoll Pochter went to Alexandria for the summer, to teach English to 7- and 8-year-old Egyptian children and to improve his Arabic. He was looking forward to returning to Kenyon College for his junior year and to spending his spring semester in Jordan,” Pochter’s parents told CNN.

“As we understand it, he was witnessing the protest as a bystander and was stabbed by a protester. He went to Egypt because he cared profoundly about the Middle East, and he planned to live and work there in the pursuit of peace and understanding. Andrew was a wonderful young man looking for new experiences in the world and finding ways to share his talents while he learned. Andrew cared deeply about his family and his friends. We won’t have any further comment and ask for privacy now at this difficult time for the family.”

Marcela Colmenares, a Venezuelan scholar at Kenyon College who was a friend of Pochter’s, paid tribute to him in her blog Saturday, saying he exemplified the “difference between a talker and a doer.”

Colmenares related her first meeting with Pochter in the college library, where they became caught up in a political argument and discovered their mutual interest in the Middle East.

“The last time we spoke, he was already in Egypt and we agreed to eat a falafel in August, when he would come back to Maryland. After a long discussion, he planned to prove that — against my predictions — the falafels in Adams Morgan were better than those in Berlin,” wrote Colmenares.

“But he is never going to come back, because he was killed in a protest in Alexandria, where he was — according to the news — teaching English during the summer. In fact, Andrew was doing much more than teaching English, he was absorbing every bit of the Egyptian culture, he was learning about the Middle East, and he was doing what so many people avoid — following his passion,” she wrote.

Andrew Pochter.  (photo credit: Facebook)

Andrew Pochter. (photo credit: Facebook)

In 2011, Pochter wrote an article for Al Arabiya on the effects of the Arab Spring on Moroccan society. He was an active member of a group of Kenyon students interested in the Middle East, was involved in Middle East activism on campus and took part in a forum Colmenares had created for students willing to discuss the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and collaborate to organize events.

Pochter was also active with Hillel, the Jewish campus organization.

“I don’t know the details about his death, and I don’t want to know them,” Colmenares wrote.

“But I know that it was provoked by an unreasonable amount of hate, a hate that does not have owners and that will never have a proper explanation –because it is irrational. This hate managed to kill an American who genuinely cared about the Middle East, and who would have had an extremely positive impact on the region. Violence is increasing in Egypt, especially towards Americans,” she lamented.

Late Friday, Alexandria security chief Gen. Amin Ezz Eddin told Al-Jazeera TV that an American later identified as Pochtor was killed in Sidi Gabr Square while photographing the battle. The US State Department later confirmed the death, in a statement from Patrick Ventrell, a press office director.

“We are providing appropriate consular assistance from our Embassy in Cairo and our Bureau of Consular Affairs at the State Department,” he said.

An Egyptian medical official, in an earlier unconfirmed report, had said Pochtor died of gunshot wounds at a hospital. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press.

In the aftermath of Friday’s deadly clashes, the US State Department issued a travel warning cautioning citizens to avoid Egypt.

“The US Department of State warns US citizens traveling to or living in Egypt to defer non-essential travel to Egypt at this time due to the continuing possibility of political and social unrest. On June 28, 2013, the Department of State authorized the departure of a limited number of non-emergency employees and family members. US citizens are urged to remain alert to local security developments and to be vigilant regarding their personal security,” the warning read.

Iran’s Rohani vows to moderate foreign policy

June 29, 2013

Iran’s Rohani vows to moderate foreign policy – Israel News, Ynetnews.

President-elect condemns extremism, states commitment to inclusive cabinet, moderate views, urges ‘effective, constructive interaction with world’

Reuters

Published: 06.29.13, 15:21 / Israel News

Iran’s president-elect Hassan Rohani said on Saturday he would appoint ministers from across its political spectrum as Iranian voters had chosen a path of moderation over extremism.

His victory in the June 14 vote has lifted hopes of a thaw in Iran’s antagonistic relations with the West that might create openings for defusing its nuclear dispute with world powers. Rohani has pledged a more conciliatory approach than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, under whose belligerent presidency the Islamic Republic drew ever more punishing international sanctions.

Rohani’s pledge of an inclusive cabinet could reassure conservative hardliners who look askance at the endorsement he was granted by reformists in the election.

In turn, reformists will hope to regain some political influence – with the aim of easing repression at home and Iran’s isolation abroad – after being sidelined under Ahmadinejad, who by law could not run for a third consecutive term.

“The future government must operate in the framework of moderation …(and it) must avoid extremism, and this message is for everyone,” Rohani, a former chief nuclear negotiator, said in a speech carried live on state television.

“The next cabinet will be trans-factional … This government is not obligated to any party or faction, and will work to choose the most qualified people from all sides and factions, under conditions of moderation and temperance.”

Analysts say Rohani, a mid-ranking Shiite Muslim cleric who has held sensitive security posts since the 1980s, enjoys an insider status and close relationship with theocratic Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and may be able to build bridges between factions to yield reforms.

But Khamenei will retain the final say on policies that most concern world powers, including Iran’s nuclear program and its support for Syrian President Bashar Assad against rebels trying to overthrow him.

Constructive Interaction

Rohani also urged moderation in Iranian policies towards the rest of the world and called for a balance between “realism” and pursuing the ideals of the Islamic Republic.

“Moderation in foreign policy is neither submission nor antagonism, neither passivity nor confrontation. Moderation is effective and constructive interaction with the world,” he said.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran, as a major regional power or the biggest regional power…, must play its role and for this we need moderation.”

Western powers suspect Iran of seeking to develop a nuclear weapons capability, which Tehran denies. The Islamic Republic is now languishing under increasingly tough sanctions limiting its oil sales, a crucial source of revenue, obstructing its foreign trade and stoking higher inflation and unemployment.

Iran’s friends and foes indicated shortly after Rohani’s election triumph they did not believe it would bring fundamental change in Iranian foreign policy.

Tehran is at loggerheads with Western powers on a range of foreign policy issues including its shadowy nuclear program and its support for Syria’s Assad, the Lebanese Shiite militant movement Hezbollah and

the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas .

US-allied Gulf Arab countries have also accused Iran of interfering in their affairs, though Tehran denies trying to subvert Saudi Arabia and its wealthy Gulf neighbors.

Rohani, who will take office in early August, said he was dedicated to “mutual relaxation of tensions” with other states.

IDF combat unit spies on Hezbollah in North

June 29, 2013

IDF combat unit spies on Hezbollah in North | JPost | Israel News.

LAST UPDATED: 06/29/2013 07:56
’Post’ joins intelligence battalion drilling for war in North; unit collects crucial data for would-be confrontation in Golan.

SOLDIERS FROM the Shahaf Battalion.

SOLDIERS FROM the Shahaf Battalion. Photo: Yaakov Lappin

Dressed in civilian clothing, Hezbollah members, the undisputed rulers of southern Lebanon, make every effort to cover their tracks, as they stash heavy weaponry and rockets in Lebanese village homes and prepare for the next war with Israel.

But their movements are being closely watched by the soldiers of the IDF’s Shahaf (Seagull) Combat Intelligence Collection Battalion, based on the northern border.

The battalion – the second-largest in the IDF – this week completed a grueling five-week training drill in the Upper Galilee, designed to prepare its members for all eventualities. During continuous security missions, the battalion expands the IDF’s target list, which will be activated during a future outbreak of war.

Once hostilities erupt, the battalion provides an instant intelligence picture of developments in the field, enabling the IDF to quickly direct devastating, accurate firepower at enemy positions.

The Jerusalem Post joined Lt.-Col. Yiftah Siboni, the battalion commander, during the last phase of the exercise in the Galilean hills this week.

“We monitor Hezbollah and update the list of targets for attack. We’re continuously adding targets to the list. This is the core aspect of our activities.

We are hunters, not fishermen. We don’t wait around for something to bite, but rather, seek out the targets,” Siboni said, as he trekked through dense forest.

The battalion’s soldiers had just completed an allnight 15-kilometer march through highly rugged and mountainous terrain, carrying 40 kilograms of equipment on their back.

In this kind of terrain, it takes 2 hours to cover 2 km., rather than the standard 20 minutes.

The soldiers do not merely locate targets. During hostilities, they must transmit the precise locations of enemy positions, in real time, to the 91st Division, which is based in the Galilee and which would coordinate front-line missions during a war with Hezbollah.

The information, painstakingly collected by the battalion, is passed on to a range of military forces that can direct precise fire on targets, from tanks, artillery and combat helicopters.

“During times of conflict, we can direct fire on targets within minutes of identification. Alternatively, targets are passed on to Military Intelligence,” Siboni said.

Gathering intelligence in the field is always a challenge, in light of the fact that Hezbollah’s members are disguised as civilians, and the terror organization’s facilities are often planted in the middle of civilian areas. “We see them from the border, all across the sector,” Siboni said.

Hezbollah has some 80,000 rockets pointed at Israel, most of them situated in the Shi’ite villages of southern Lebanon. The data being collected by the battalion today will be crucial in a potential future confrontation.

During routine surveillance missions, the soldiers work quietly, setting up forward, camouflaged posts. They can remain in their hidden position for anywhere between two to three days at a time, and spend many hours in the field every week.

Their efforts are backed by operators who monitor video feeds from remote controlled cameras dotted along the border.

The battalion is also equipped with “Raccoon” recon and observation vehicles, which have advanced sensors.

Invisible from even a close distance, one combat team crouched down under the shade of a large pine tree, simulating a wartime mission.

Every soldier was equipped with a map, while one soldier held a device linking him to a command and control system called Digital Ground Army.

The hi-tech system allows all of the IDF’s command levels to see the position of enemy cells, as well as the location of IDF units, in any given sector.

“What they do here is evaluate the targets,” Siboni explained, stressing the most unique aspect of the battalion’s mission. In the field, day or night, in all weather conditions, the soldiers must make quick decisions on the intelligence value of what they see.

During combat, those decisions could lead to a tank shell or a helicopter missile strike, if the soldiers conclude that the target poses an immediate threat. As they engage in such complex judgments, the soldiers have to be ready to engage threats themselves, if they come under fire.

The risk of coming under fire would grow if the battalion joins the IDF in a ground maneuver inside Lebanon. For that reason, the soldiers in recent weeks practiced live-fire exercises in open areas and urban environments.

In other drills, the soldiers practiced scrambling to jeeps and getting to new locations within 30 minutes, to ensure flexibility.

“The combat team must understand the entire division, and know what the brigade commander needs to know to win the battle, and what territory has to be covered.

They have to be aware of how best to provide an evaluation for the higher commanders,” Siboni explained.

In the exercise, soldiers from the Armored Corps played Hezbollah members seeking to take out the Combat Intelligence soldiers. The soldiers had to “neutralize” the enemy and continue in their mission.

Sgt. Yotam Wolf, commander of the combat team hidden under the tree, said, “Currently we’re identifying the enemy in the field. We’re creating a target list for the division commander. As soon as we identify something, we will send it directly onwards. We have to ensure that we’re not looking a UN vehicle or noncombatants.”

Once a hostile target is confirmed during a war, the team will monitor the IDF’s strike on it to ensure an accurate hit. “We categorize the targets – are they weapons storage facilities or lookout posts? What should be done? More surveillance? If we see an enemy unit with weapons, is this a new development?” Siboni added.

Among the soldiers under the pine tree was Cpl. Netzah Miller, a yeshiva student who emigrated to Israel three years ago from California.

“I see this as my duty. I feel that my role has an influence,” he said.

“Just one identification of a target can change the picture. This understanding makes me happy about my role,” Miller added.

To the east, on the Golan Heights, the IDF is setting up a new Combat Intelligence battalion, on the border with Syria.

As Israel’s northern frontiers continue to bristle with developing threats and instability, the IDF is investing advanced resources to enable it to keep close tabs on what takes place over the border. •

Rowhani’s double-edged nuclear strategy

June 29, 2013

Rowhani’s double-edged nuclear strategy – Alarabiya.net English | Front Page.

Saturday, 29 June 2013
Al Arabiya

One of the most controversial geopolitical and geostrategic issues in today’s international and regional affairs is Iran’s nuclear defiance towards the international community and its tensions with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Tehran’s crippling economy, four rounds of economic and political sanctions, high inflation, significant unemployment rate, and regional and international isolation are all directly and indirectly linked to Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The next president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, who in less than two months will replace the provocative and inflammatory President Ahmadinejad, will have to confront all these issues.

The major question raised asks whether Hassan Rowhani, as a moderate, will halt Iran’s nuclear program. In addition, speculation also concerns whether Iran’s newest president will suspend Tehran’s nuclear enrichment in various strategic cities such as Arak, Natanz, Isfahan, and Bushehr.

The diplomatic sheikh

The widespread belief is that since Rowhani is a reformist and well-known for his political initiatives as the “diplomatic sheikh,” he will bring about a change to Tehran’s nuclear defiance and will halt Iran’s nuclear program – or at least agree to suspend it. Moreover, it is also argued, and asserted by the Islamic Republic of Iran, that Rowhani will support a proposal to send Iran’s twenty percent enriched uranium abroad so that it can be transformed into fuel for the Tehran Research Reactor.-

However, it is crucial to pay a closer analysis to Rouhani’s political ideology and stance within the Islamic Republic of Iran. Hassan Rowhani, who during Iran’s three televised national debates attempted to project himself as a reformist to win votes, is in actuality from the centrist political camp. Iran’s centrist political camp has always attempted to juggle ties with both the hardliners – including the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – and the reformists. For example, Rowhani has had close political and personal connections with Ayatollah Khamenei as well as Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a political figure perceived as a rival to the supreme leader. Rowhani served for twenty-two years on the Expediency Council; an advisory body long chaired by Rafsanjani, and also serves as a member of the Supreme National Security Council, where he served as Ayatollah Khamenei’s personally appointed representative. He is also a member of the Assembly of Experts; a political body with close ties to the supreme leader.

Primarily, Iran’s centrist ideology supports using softer and more diplomatic tones on regional and international platforms. Nevertheless, and more fundamentally, the centrists strongly insist on pursuing Tehran’s current political status quo, foreign policy objectives, and continued assistance towards the survival of the Shiite cleric-ruled regime. While Rowhani is nicknamed the diplomatic sheikh and while he calls for applying less hostile language when dealing with the West, it is nevertheless unrealistic to argue that Rowhani will alter Tehran’s nuclear program and foreign policies or challenge the supreme leader.

Concrete evidence

The most concrete evidence supporting this argument is Rowhani’s recent writings and interviews in the Persian language. In a recent interview, Hassan Abedini, the host of one of Iran’s state media channels, IRIB, said that Iran’s nuclear work had been halted as a result of the negotiations that Rowhani took part in. Rowhani then immediately interrupted Abedini by exclaiming: “What you said is a lie. You know it’s a lie. This statement is what ignorant people say; you are taught in this….Maybe the person speaking to you in your earpiece doesn’t know, but you know.” After Iran’s state media host pressured Rowhani further, Rowhani said “we suspended the [nuclear] program? We completed the [nuclear] program. This is unethical act of the IRIB [channel] that has permeated into you. And the person who is talking with you into your earpiece, this unethical act has permeated into him, as well.”

In this interview, Rouhani supported his position that although the West and international community believe that Iran was halting its nuclear program, Rowhani – as the chief nuclear negotiator – was in fact further completing the program to achieve nuclear capabilities. In addition, at the Supreme Cultural Revolution Council, Rouhani made clear his position on Iran’s nuclear program: “While we were talking with the Europeans in Tehran, we were [simultaneously] installing equipment in parts of the [nuclear] facility in Isfahan, but we still had a long way to go to accomplish the project. In fact, by creating a tranquil environment, we were able to finfish the work in Isfahan.”

Furthermore, after Hassan Rouhani was elected as the Islamic Republic of Iran’s seventh president, he declared that the United States must recognize Iran’s nuclear rights and pledge not to interfere in its internal and domestic affairs. Additionally, in his press conference, the president-elect clearly stated, “the era of [enrichment] suspension is gone.”

Therefore, the major question actually surrounds what the political and ideological differences between Rowhani and Ahmadinejad will be regarding Iran’s nuclear program. On one hand, Rowhani will attempt to display on-the-surface semblance of “transparency,” “openness,” “dialogue,” and “communication” with the West. On the other hand however, Rowhani will also employ policies that will ensure the survival of the Shiite regime in the Islamic Republic of Iran. As a veteran politician and the regime insider who has proven his loyalty to the supreme leader and the ruling clerics, Rowhani will continue Tehran’s domestic and foreign policies geared towards Iran’s pursuit of nuclear capabilities. This is due to the fact that the regime and its beneficiaries, including Rowhani, strongly believe that nuclear weapons can serve as a strong deterrent to any foreign intervention in Iran, a powerful tool for the survival of the current clerical establishment, and can also serve as leverage for continuing regional hegemonic ambitions and tipping the balance of power in favor of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Obama’s war of ideas

June 29, 2013

Column One: Obama’s war of ideas | JPost | Israel News.

( In my opinion, Glick mistakenly attributes the failures of US foreign policy to Obama’s ideological bent.  I see it more as the product of ignorance and ineptitude. – JW )

06/27/2013 22:41
US foreign policy is failing worldwide.

US President Barack Obama, June 17, 2013.

US President Barack Obama, June 17, 2013. Photo: Reuters
US foreign policy is failing worldwide.The Russian and Chinese embrace of indicted traitor Edward Snowden is just the latest demonstration of the contempt in which the US is held by an ever increasing number of adversarial states around the world.Iran has also gotten a piece of the action.As part of the regime’s bread and circuses approach to its subjects, supreme dictator Ali Khamenei had pretend reformer Hassan Rohani win the presidential election in a landslide two weeks ago. Rohani has a long record of advancing Iran’s nuclear program, both as a national security chief and as a senior nuclear negotiator. He also has a record of deep involvement in acts of mass terror, including the 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people and wounded hundreds.

Yet rather than distance itself from Rohani the phony, the Obama administration has celebrated Iranian democracy and embraced him as a reformer. Obama’s spokesmen say they look forward to renewing nuclear talks with Rohani, and so made clear – yet again – that the US has no intention of preventing Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

Rohani responded to the administration’s embrace by stating outright he will not suspend Iran’s nuclear enrichment activities. In other words, so great is Iran’s contempt for President Barack Obama and his administration, that it didn’t even pay lip service to the notion of cutting a deal.

And that makes sense. Obama only has one card he is willing to play with Iran – appeasement. And so that is the card he plays. His allies are already talking about containing a nuclear Iran. But that’s not an option.

A government’s ability to employ a strategy of nuclear containment is entirely dependent on the credibility of its nuclear threats. Obama is slashing the US nuclear arsenal, and Snowden reportedly just gave the Russians and the Chinese the US’s revised nuclear war plans. Obama has no credibility in nuclear games of chicken. He has no chance of containing Khamenei and his apocalyptic jihad state.

Iran, its Russian ally and its Lebanese Hezbollah proxy now have the upper hand in the Syrian civil war. In large part due to Obama’s foreign policy, the war is spilling into Lebanon and threatening Jordan and Iraq – not to mention Israel. In response to this state of affairs, Obama has decided to begin arming the al-Qaida-dominated Syrian opposition forces. Now it’s true, Obama is planning to transfer US arms to the Supreme Military Council of the Free Syrian Army that is recognized by the US. But that is no reason not to worry.

The Free Syrian Army is dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood. It condemned the US’s decision to designate the Syrian al-Qaida affiliate, Jabhat al-Nusra, a foreign terrorist organization. FSA fighters and commanders regularly collaborate with (and sometimes fight) Al-Nusra. At a minimum, there is no reason to believe that these US arms will not be used in conjunction with al-Qaida forces in Syria.

In truth, there is little reason from a US perspective to view a Syria dominated by any of the warring parties – including the FSA – as amenable to US interests or values. There is no ideological distinction between the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood and those of al-Qaida, or Hamas or a dozen other jihadist armed groups that were formed by Muslim Brotherhood members. Like Iran and its proxies, they all want to see Western civilization – led by the US – destroyed. And yes, they all want to destroy Israel, and Europe.

But for the Obama administration, this ideological affinity is not relevant.

The only distinction they care about is whether a group just indoctrinates people to become jihadists, or whether they are actively engaged – at this minute – in plotting or carrying out terrorist attacks against the US. And even then, there are exceptions.

For instance, the Taliban are actively waging war against the US in Afghanistan. But since the Obama administration has no will to defeat the Taliban, it is begging them to negotiate with US officials.

Obama’s default position in the Muslim world is to support the Muslim Brotherhood. Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood is the wellspring of the Sunni jihadist movement. And Obama is the Brotherhood’s greatest ally. He facilitated the Brotherhood’s rise to power in Egypt, at the expense of the US’s most important Arab ally, Hosni Mubarak.

He even supported them at the expense of American citizens employed in Egypt by US government- supported NGOs. Forty-three Americans were arrested for promoting democracy, and all the administration would do was facilitate their escape from Egypt. Robert Becker, the one US aid worker who refused to flee, was abandoned by the State Department. He just escaped from Egypt after being sentenced to two years in prison.

The Obama administration supports the Morsi government even as it persecutes Christians. It supports the Muslim Brotherhood even though the government has demonstrated economic and administrative incompetence, driving Egypt into failed state status. Egypt is down to its last few cans of fuel. It is facing the specter of mass starvation. And law and order have already broken down entirely. It has lost the support of large swathes of the public. But still Obama maintains faith.

Then there are the Palestinians.

Next week John Kerry will knock on our door, again in an obsessive effort to restart the mordant phony peace process. For its part, as The Jerusalem Post’s Khaled Abu Toameh reported this week, the supposedly moderate Fatah-ruled Palestinian Authority has adopted a policy of denying Jews entrance to PA-ruled areas. Jewish reporters – Israeli and non-Israeli – are barred from covering the PA or speaking with Fatah and PA officials.

Jewish diplomats are barred from speaking to PA officials or joining the entourage of diplomats who speak with them. Jewish businessmen are barred from doing business in the PA.

As for the radical Hamas terror group that rules Gaza, this week Hamas again reiterated its loyalty to its covenant which calls for the obliteration of Israel and the annihilation of world Jewry.

But Kerry is coming back because he’s convinced that the reason there’s no peace process is that Israelis are too rich, and too happy, and too stingy, and too suspicious, and too lacking empathy for the Palestinians who continue to teach their children to murder our children.

You might think that this pile-on of fiascos would lead Obama and his advisers to reconsider their behavior.

But you’d be wrong. If Obama were asked his opinion of his foreign policy he would respond with absolute conviction that his foreign policy is a total success – everywhere. And by his own metrics, he’d be right.

Obama is a man of ideas. And he has surrounded himself with men and women who share his ideas. For Obama and his advisers, what matters are not the facts, but the theoretical assumptions – the ideas – that determine their policies. If they like an idea, if they find it ideologically attractive, then they base their policies on it. Consequences and observable reality are no match for their ideas. To serve their ideas, reality can be deliberately distorted. Facts can be ignored, or denied.

Obama has two ideas that inform his Middle East policy. First, the Muslim Brotherhood is good. And so his policy is to support the Muslim Brotherhood, everywhere. That’s his idea, and as long as the US continues to support the Brotherhood, its foreign policy is successful. For Obama it doesn’t matter whether the policy is harmful to US national security. It doesn’t matter if the Brotherhood slaughters Christians and Shi’ites and persecutes women and girls. It doesn’t matter if the Brotherhood’s governing incompetence transforms Egypt – and Tunisia, and Libya and etc., into hell on earth. As far as Obama is concerned, as long as he is true to his idea, his foreign policy is a success.

Obama’s second idea is that the root cause of all the problems in the region is the absence of a Palestinian state on land Israel controls. And as a consequence, Israel is to blame for everything bad that happens because it is refusing to give in to all of the Palestinians’ demands.

Stemming from this view, the administration can accept a nuclear Iran. After all, if Israel is to blame for everything, then Iran isn’t a threat to America.

This is why Fatah terrorism, incitement and anti-Semitism are ignored.

This is why Hamas’s Deputy Foreign Minister Ghazi Hamad reported that he met with senior US officials two weeks ago.

This is why Kerry is coming back to pressure the rich, stingy, paranoid, selfish Jews into making massive concessions to the irrelevant Palestinians.

Obama’s satisfaction with his foreign policy is demonstrated by the fact that he keeps appointing likeminded ideologues to key positions.

This week it was reported that Kerry is set to appoint Robert Malley to serve as deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs. Malley has built his career out of advancing the ideas Obama embraces.

In 2001, Malley authored an article in The New York Times where he blamed Israel for the failure of the Camp David peace summit in July 2000. At that summit, Israel offered the Palestinians nearly everything they demanded. Not only did Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat refuse the offer. He refused to make a counteroffer.

Instead he went home and ordered his deputies to prepare to initiate the terror war against Israel which he started two months later.

As Lee Smith wrote in a profile of Malley in Tablet in 2010, Malley’s article, and subsequent ones, “created a viable interpretative framework for continuing to blame both sides for the collapse of the peace process even after the outbreak of the second intifada. If both sides were at fault, then it would be possible to resume negotiations once things calmed down. If, on the other hand, the sticking point was actually about existential issues – the refusal to accept a Jewish state – and the inability, or unwillingness, of the Palestinians to give up the right of Arab refugees to return to their pre- 1948 places of residence, then Washington would have been compelled to abandon the peace process after Clinton left office.”

In other words, Malley shared the idea that Israel was to blame for the pathologies of the Arabs. Stemming from this view, Malley has been meeting with Hamas terrorists for years. He belittled the threat posed by a nuclear Iran and accused Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu of exaggerating the Iranian nuclear threat to divert attention away from the Palestinians. He has also met with Hezbollah, and has been an outspoken supporter of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

After the September 11 attacks, the US pledged to wage a war of ideas in the Muslim world. And in Obama’s foreign policy, we have such a war of ideas.

The only problem is that all of his ideas are wrong.

caroline@carolineglick.com