Archive for April 2013

US lawmakers demand action on Syria chemical weapons

April 26, 2013

US lawmakers demand action on Syria chemical weapons – Israel News, Ynetnews.

After White House says Assad regime used chemical weapons in civil war, members of Congress urge Obama to act. ‘We do not want them to fall into the wrong hands,’ McCain says. Democrat Dianne Feinstein: Red lines have been crossed

Ynet, AFP

Published: 04.26.13, 00:45 / Israel News

Members of Congress urged US President Barack Obama on Thursday to take action to “secure” Syria’s chemical weapons after he warned that strongman Bashar Assad used them against his own people.

Republican Senator John McCain led the revulsion and anger in Congress, saying it was now up to Obama to coordinate a response that prevents such weapons, including the agent sarin, from falling into the hands of terrorists or extremist groups.

Obama “said that if Bashar Assad used chemical weapons, it would be a game-changer, that it would cross a red line. I think it’s pretty obvious that a red line has been crossed,” McCain told reporters.

“We have to have operational capability to secure these chemical weapon stocks,” he added. “We do not want them to fall into the wrong hands, and the wrong hands are a number of participants in the struggle that’s taking place in Syria.”

For months the veteran Republican has urged Obama to take a more pro-active role in the Syrian conflict and pressed him to help arm Syrian rebels and ensure safe havens in the country.

On Thursday he called for increased White House pressure on Russia and Iran to stop supplying weapons to Assad, and greater commitment to aid Syria’s rebel groups fighting Damascus.
חיות מתות בחאן אל-אסל שליד חלב. לטענת התושבים, הן מתו מחומר כימי שפיזרו כוחות אסד (צילום: רויטרס)

Dead animals in Khan al-Assal. Rebels say they died from chemical agent (Photo: Reuters) 

“The situation on the ground today is stalemate, with the Iranians and the Russians all in, and the United States of America gives them (Syrian rebels) flak jackets. That is not comforting when Scud missiles are hitting you.”

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Thursday that US intelligence has concluded “with some degree of varying confidence” that the Syrian government has used sarin gas as a weapon in its two-year-old civil war.

Following Hagel’s comments, US Secretary of State John Kerry said on Capitol Hill that there were two instances of chemical weapons use.
על פי דמשק, אלה הם פצועים בהתקפת נשק כימי של המורדים בחלב (צילום: EPA)

People Damascus claims were injured in rebel chemical attack in Aleppo (Photo: EPA) 

Democrat Dianne Feinstein, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, concurred that “red lines have been crossed” in Syria.

“Action must be taken to prevent larger scale use. Syria has the ability to kill tens of thousands with its chemical weapons,” she said in a statement.

“The world must come together to prevent this by unified action which results in the secure containment of Syria’s significant stockpile of chemical weapons.”
על פי המורדים, אלו אזרחים שנפגעו בהתקפת נשק כימי מצד המשטר

Man rebels claim was injured in chemical attack by Assad forces

Republican Howard “Buck” McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said Assad’s use of chemical weapons on the Syrian people, if true, is “an astounding violation of human rights,” and triggers a “national security imperative.”

Obama now has “a deep moral imperative” to act, McKeon said.

Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss said the chemical weapons revelation “changes the game.”

Asked what the next US step should be, Chambliss told AFP: “That’s for our military folks to tell us.”

Republican Senator Marco Rubio of Florida issued a statement urging US military action against the Assad regime.

“It’s clear the ‘red line’ drawn by President Obama has now been crossed. The time for passive engagement in this conflict must come to an end.

“It is in the vital national security interest of our nation to see Assad’s removal,” Rubio continued. “He is Iran’s closest ally in the region and a tyrant who has been murdering his own people for more than two years, while threatening regional stability. We must not allow Assad to continue violating all international norms by using these vile weapons and allowing Syria to descend further into chaos and instability. This will have disastrous consequences for US interests for decades to come.

“I urge President Obama to explain to Congress and the American people how he will ensure Syria’s chemical and biological weapons stockpiles are secured, how we’ll work with our allies to prevent further use of these deadly weapons, and what additional measures he is ready to take to follow through on his previous statements,” the senator said.

Policy disputes and individual options

April 26, 2013

Policy disputes and individual options | Jerusalem Post – Blogs.

This week’s headlines have featured two separate quarrels of the kind that fascinate policy mavens, even while they cause us simpletons to scratch our heads and wonder who, if anyone, is right.

One of them–or actually two separate but closely related quarrels–is of the kind that stirs interest and concern among those who worry about an escalation of Middle East tensions.
Another was more purely Israeli, although for a short time it caused problems for some thousands wanting to come or leave.
The highest profile quarrels pit Israeli and American analysts and politicians against one another around hot button weapons of mass destruction being or not being used by Syria, and close to being developed or not so close in Iran.
Two of Israel’s highest ranking military intelligence analysts–one in active service and one retired–announced in public forums that Syrian forces had used poison gas against rebels and civilians, and that Iran has crossed Israel’s “red line” with respect to its development of nuclear weapons.
Americans are not so sure about either of those problems. The President himself had said that the United States could not tolerate Syrian use of poison gas or Iran’s creation of nuclear weapons. More recent official announcements from on high are that the United States cannot rely on any foreign government’s assessment of what is happening in Syria as a reason to act, and that its own analysis have yet to establish conclusively that Syria has used its forbidden weapons. Commentators are describing a “diplomatic incident” between Washington and Jerusalem, and the Prime Minister’s embarrassment that his chief intelligence official went public about Syrian gas during the visit of Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.
Prominent during that visit was an airing of US and Israeli conceptions of what it would take to deal more forcefully with Iran. Israel is holding to a standard of Iran preparing the ingredients for a nuclear weapon, relevant to what the former head of military intelligence announced this week, while the US seems to be concerned only about the actual assembling of the ingredients into a deliverable weapon.
Among the events of Hagel’s visit was the announcement of a new arms agreement between Israel and the United States, including the eventual delivery of more tools of increased sophistication that will–in American terms–“assure Israel’s capacity to defend itself.” Local cynics view the same deal as the price the United States is paying for Israel’s cooperation, i.e. not acting against Iran without an American agreement that is not likely to come.
Some of those same cynics are saying that if the US is avoiding the obvious signs of Syrian use of poison gas, it is never likely to find “conclusive evidence” of Iran’s intentions and capacity with respect to nuclear weapons.
Other Israelis are wondering why anyone in their government is making an issue of Syria. Let the Syrians continue to kill themselves–who cares how–but keep the focus on the more serious problem of Iran.
Somewhere in the American calculations may be a memory of Israeli intelligence on Iraq. It was one of the sources that convinced George W. Bush that Iraq was close to having/using/developing weapons of mass destruction, including gas and nuclear. That was one of the reasons for the US invasion of 2003, which toppled Saddam but did not find what Israelis and others had described.
Of lesser interest to policy mavens fascinated by things military was an Israeli flap over open skies. The government approved an agreement with the European Union to a mutual deregulation of air traffic despite a strike of Israeli air carriers and a threatened strike of airport workers against all takeoffs and landings. Airline personnel claimed that they would lose out in competition with the richer and better connected European airlines, while government officials promoting the deal said that it would greatly increase tourism and provide many more jobs overall than might be lost by Israeli airlines becoming more efficient or succumbing to the competition..
Involved in the dispute were conflicting assessments about current realities and prospects. Government officials claimed that El Al was greatly overstaffed, and had to slim down. Labor officials asserted that El Al had more personnel per plane than European competitors because El Al did its own servicing of aircraft.
Several thousand Israelis and tourists wanting to leave the country or come to the country found themselves stranded, until the government agreed to the deal that commentators had said was obvious, i.e., to increase its payment of the costs of security (i.e., screening passengers above the standards applied elsewhere) that it demands of Israeli airlines.
Involved in open skies here and elsewhere are quarrels about the importance or threat of tourism.
For property developers and the people involved in hotels, tour buses, guiding, restaurants, airlines, and shopping, tourism is the holy grail of economic expansion.
It is something else for environmentalists and ordinary Israelis worried about the crowds in their small country, with its old cities, narrow streets,  and limited parking.
Elsewhere as well there are debates about excessive tourism spoiling sites for locals and tourists alike. The doubters employ the concept of “overbooking” to emphasize the garbage off-loaded by cruse liners and their inundation of scenic ports by day tourists, the competitive barking of guides to their groups, each in their own language at iconic sites, and the distortion of economic priorities in Third World countries blessed or cursed by tourist attractions. Neither Greece nor Italy are Third World, but there are limited pleasures visiting the Acropolis or Florence. Bangkok’s temples and canals are fascinating, but require a huge outlay in one’s tolerance of the traffic jams in getting to them. Africa’s animals make for great pictures, providing you succeed in cropping out the competing Land Rovers.
Israel’s government has mechanisms to balance demands for development and preservation, with limited satisfaction about the results. It is difficult to enjoy the Old City of Jerusalem while shuffling along with the crowds, but Acre is less crowded for those wanting to visit and shop in an old walled city, there is room on the Mediterranean beaches, the water is usually clean, there is likely to be a table at one of the Tel Aviv coffee houses, Eilat’s hotels provide air conditioned refuge from the heat, and the Galilee has decent roads and great sites, when not crowded during Israeli weeks of vacation (Passover and Succoth).
Perhaps the greatest problem associated with a treaty of peace with Palestinians and other Muslim countries is not defining borders and moving people here and there, but the flooding of  the country and especially Jerusalem with millions of Muslims who will be competing with millions of Christians and Jews at the same or very near by holy places.
Look out for yourself is the guiding principal.
Us pensioners should avoid traveling in high season. We have the government provided gas kits likely to be effective against whatever Syria sends against us. The bomb shelter downstairs should be sufficient when Iran retaliates, if Israel gives up on the US and does what it is threatening to do in response to the crossing of Bibi’s red line.
Hebrew University Political Science professor Ira Sharkansky evaluates the latest happenings in Israel.

Ex-Hezbollah leader: Iran told us to join Syrian war

April 26, 2013

Ex-Hezbollah leader: Iran told us to join Syrian war | JPost | Israel News.

By BLOOMBERG
04/25/2013 17:27
Disaffected former leader of terrorist group, Sobhi al-Tofaili, says Hezbollah split over involvement in Syria conflict.

Flags of Hezbollah, Assad's Syria

Flags of Hezbollah, Assad’s Syria Photo: REUTERS/Ali Hashisho

Iran pressed Hezbollah fighters to join the civil war in Syria to bolster President Bashar Assad’s armed struggle, according to Sobhi al-Tofaili, a disaffected former leader of the militant group.

The allegation, made on Lebanon’s Future Television, echoes similar comments by George Sabra, interim leader of the Syrian National Coalition, at a press conference in Turkey on April 22.

The former Hezbollah secretary said that at least 138 militiamen had died in Syria and scores had been wounded. The organization is split over its involvement, he said.

Lebanese Sunni Muslim clerics called on April 23 for a holy war to defend co-religionists in Syria from Hezbollah, amid concern that Lebanon is being sucked into its neighbor’s increasingly sectarian conflict. Lebanon’s President Michel Suleiman dismissed the calls. The uprising against Assad began with peaceful protests in March 2011 that turned violent when the government forces turned their guns on demonstrators.

“Hezbollah fighters have crossed the border and started to kill our people to support the murderer Bashar Assad,” Sabra said at a televised press conference. The group is “occupying Syrian villages, murdering civilians, preventing them from peacefully expressing their views.”

Hezbollah has denied it is backing Assad in the fighting, saying it’s helping Lebanese Shi’ites living in Syrian border towns and villages to defend themselves against rebel assaults. It has remained largely silent amid a wave of recent accusations by Syrian opposition leaders and Lebanese groups about its involvement in Syria.

“Hezbollah has not denied the claims and does not appear very concerned about how its involvement will be interpreted,” said Paul Salem, director of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Middle East Center in Beirut.

After the protests evolved into armed conflict and the al- Nusra Front’s involvement was highlighted, both Iran and Hezbollah had a “convenient excuse — that they are fighting against militant jihadis and not an Arab Spring uprising,” he said.

They may have concluded that “Assad is not about to fall and that they’re not on the Titanic but on the side that’s going to be around for a long time,” he said.

Syria’s conflict is rapidly deteriorating and is threatening the stability of its neighbors, particularly Lebanon, Susan Rice, the US ambassador to the United Nations, told the Security Council Wednesday.

“Hezbollah not only continues to undermine Lebanon from within by violating the government’s policy of disassociation, but actively enables Assad to wage war on the Syrian people by providing money, weapons, and expertise to the regime in close coordination with Iran,” she said.

In a letter to Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah from Moaz al-Khatib, former SNC leader, he said: “Is it satisfying to you that the Syrian regime shells it citizens with fighter planes and Scud missiles?

‘‘I demand that you withdraw all Hezbollah troops from Syria,’’ al-Khatib said.

Analysis: Hezbollah drone a dangerous publicity stunt

April 26, 2013

Analysis: Hezbollah drone a dangerous publicity stunt | JPost | Israel News.

LAST UPDATED: 04/25/2013 23:53
Sending a drone into Israeli air space is meant to remind the Lebanese public that Hezbollah is still defined by its jihad against Israel and not by its large-scale and bloody involvement in the Syrian civil war.

IAF shoots down UAV that entered Israeli airspace

IAF shoots down UAV that entered Israeli airspace Photo: IDF Spokesman’s Office

Hezbollah’s attempt – likely Iranian-backed – to fly a drone into Israeli air space on Thursday is a dangerous publicity stunt designed to distract attention from its large-scale and bloody involvement in the Syrian civil war.

As the Shi’ite terror organization sends more and more fighters to kill Sunni Syrian rebels, and to try and save the regime of Bashar Assad, it is struggling to justify its involvement to Sunni Lebanese, who are growing increasingly outraged and are openly challenging Hezbollah’s role in their country and the region. Sending a drone into Israeli air space is meant to remind the Lebanese public that Hezbollah is still defined by its jihad against Israel.

Despite being an exercise in PR, the drone incident remains a serious provocation – an attempted breach of Israeli air space near Haifa, home to sensitive petrochemical plants that Hassan Nasrallah has threatened to target.

The air force’s swift reaction represents a significant improvement from the October drone infiltration, when Hezbollah managed to fly a drone deep into Israeli territory, before it was shot down. The lessons of last year’s incident have been learned well, judging by the early detection and interception of the hostile craft on Thursday.

The navy will now begin the tedious task of hunting for the drone’s pieces in the Mediterranean Sea, and the IDF will seek to answer questions such as: What type of drone was involved? Did it managed to record video footage, and could it transmit any of that footage to a base station in Lebanon in real time? The drone is only the most recent and visible aspect of a covert war raging between Iran and Hezbollah on one side, and Israel on the other.

Hezbollah agents, together with Iranian Quds Force members, continue trying to attack Israeli civilians and state targets overseas.

On occasion, there are unexplained blasts at Hezbollah weapons storage areas in southern Lebanon, as occurred last December, when a mysterious explosion tore through a suspected Hezbollah weapons depot at Tair Harfa in southern Lebanon.

Further away, Iran’s nuclear centrifuges continue to spin. All of these arenas – Lebanon, Syria, Iran (and Gaza) are interlinked.

These are tense times, and any miscalculated step can trigger a wider confrontation.

‘Syria’s chemical weapons in Hezbollah’s reach’

April 25, 2013

‘Syria’s chemical weapons in Hezbollah’s reach’ | The Times of Israel.

Israeli UN envoy says European Union ignoring Lebanese group’s terror activity, Iran ‘spinning lies’ while racing toward the bomb

April 24, 2013, 7:19 pmIsrael's UN Ambassador Ron Prosor addresses the United Nations General Assembly, Thursday, Nov. 29, 2012. (photo credit: AP/Richard Drew) 4
Israel’s UN Ambassador Ron Prosor addresses the United Nations General Assembly, Thursday, Nov. 29, 2012. (photo credit: AP/Richard Drew)

Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Ron Prosor, on Monday warned the UN Security Council that Hezbollah was close to getting its hands on Syria’s massive stockpile of chemical weapons.

“In Lebanon, Hezbollah is building an army equipped with 50,000 missiles — more than many NATO members. Now they might have access to one of the largest stockpiles of chemical weapons in the world,” said Prosor, a day after the IDF’s top intelligence analyst said that President Bashar Assad was in possession of more than 1,000 metric tons of chemical weapons and had deployed sarin nerve gas against civilians.

Prosor blamed the European Union for ignoring Hezbollah’s terrorist actions and stubbornly refusing to brand the group a terror organization.

“Hezbollah doesn’t feel the need to limit its brand of terrorism exclusively to the Middle East,” he said. “Last month, a court in Cyprus jailed a member of Hezbollah for planning terrorist attacks against civilians. Yet this still isn’t enough for some EU members to call Hezbollah what it is – a terrorist organization. It operates with impunity on European soil, yet some European lawmakers continue to insist it is a social-services organization.

“It doesn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to understand the obvious facts of this case,” Prosor added.

The Security Council was deliberating new ways to advance the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians, and Prosor listed “three pillars” of any future agreement, echoing demands often set out by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Those pillars — Palestinian recognition of Israel’s Jewish character, a cessation of anti-Israel incitement in the PA, and security assurances for Israelis — “are the foundation that must remain standing in the shifting sands of the Middle East,” he said.

When it came to the international community’s ongoing effort to engage Iran in order to curb its nuclear program, Prosor warned that Tehran was playing for time to keep the West at bay while it scrambles to reach atomic weapons capability.

“The Iranian regime spins lies almost as quickly as they are spinning centrifuges,” he said. “The Iranian nuclear program continues to advance at the speed of an express train. The international community’s efforts to stop them are moving at the pace of the local train, pausing at every stop for some nations to get off and on.”

US, Britain now believe Assad used chemical weapons

April 25, 2013

US, Britain now believe Assad used chemical weapons | The Times of Israel.

Two days after Israeli bombshell, US defense secretary says intelligence confirms, ‘with varying degree of confidence,’ small-scale use of nerve agents

April 25, 2013, 7:09 pm
Chuck Hagel speaking with reporters after reading a statement on chemical weapon use in Syria during a press conference in Abu Dhabi on Thursday. (photo credit: AP/Jim Watson, Pool)

Chuck Hagel speaking with reporters after reading a statement on chemical weapon use in Syria during a press conference in Abu Dhabi on Thursday. (photo credit: AP/Jim Watson, Pool)

US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Thursday that the US intelligence community now believes Syria has likely used chemical weapons on a “small scale” against its civilians.

Hagel added that the use of chemical weapons “violates every convention of warfare.”

Get The Times of Israel’s Daily Edition by email
and never miss our top stories
  Free Sign up!

The statement came on the heels of a public declaration Tuesday by the Israeli army’s top intelligence analyst that forces loyal to President Bashar Assad had used sarin gas against rebel forces and civilians, and may push the US closer to intervening in the two-year-old conflict.

US Secretary of State John Kerry said the Syrian regime had launched two chemical attacks.

Hagel, speaking to reporters in Abu Dhabi, said the White House has informed two senators by letter that, within the past day, “our intelligence community does assess, with varying degrees of confidence, that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons on a small scale in Syria, specifically, the chemical agent sarin.”

Britain followed the statement by saying London also believed there had been chemical attacks.

“We have limited but persuasive information from various sources showing chemical weapon use in Syria, including sarin,” a statement by the Foreign Office said. “This is extremely concerning. Use of chemical weapons is a war crime.”

Sarin, used by Saddam Hussein in aerial strikes against Iraqi Kurds in 1988 and in a Japan terror attack in 1995, is a nerve agent that cripples the respiratory system. It is hundreds of times more toxic than cyanide and is considered a weapon of mass destruction.

No information was made public on what quantity of chemical weapons might have been used in Syria, or when or what casualties might have resulted.

A victim of an alleged chemical attack in Jobar, Syria, earlier this month. (Screenshot via YouTube)

A victim of an alleged chemical attack in Jobar, Syria, earlier this month. (Screenshot via YouTube)

Hagel and US President Barack Obama have said in the past the use of chemical weapons would be a “game-changer” in the US position on intervening in the Syrian civil war.

White House legislative director Miguel Rodriguez, who signed the letter cited by Hagel, wrote that “because the president takes this issue so seriously, we have an obligation to fully investigate any and all evidence of chemical weapons use within Syria.”

The letter went to Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Carl Levin, D-Mich.

The assessment, Rodriguez said, is based in part on “physiological samples.”

He also said the US believes that the use of chemical weapons “originated with the Assad regime.” That is consistent with the Obama administration’s assertion that the Syrian rebels do not have access to the country’s stockpiles.

Earlier in the week, Hagel and Secretary of State John Kerry had said they could not confirm a report by Israeli Brig. Gen. Itai Brun that the IDF was quite certain that President Bashar Assad deployed chemical weapons against rebel forces in Syria on March 19.

Speaking at a security conference in Tel Aviv on Tuesday, Brun said further that based on the pictures of the victims — the size of their pupils, “and the foam coming out of their mouths” — the army believed that Assad’s troops had used sarin.

Brun also claimed that in Syria today there are over 1,000 tons of chemical weapons, including sarin and VX, both of which can be deployed from artillery rounds and long-range ballistic missiles.

Chemical weapons have been used on more than one occasion in Syria, and the world’s persistent reluctance to act in response to the use of those weapons is typical of the major powers’ current approach to the tremors shaking the Middle East, Brun said.

“We should be very, very worried about [chemical weapons] falling into the hands of those who do not conduct gain-loss considerations,” he said.

Kerry responded to Brun’s comments by saying he had spoken to Israeli prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who could not confirm them.

On Wednesday, Hagel said he had not been briefed on the Israeli assessment during consultations with Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon.

He added then that Washington was looking for “real intelligence” on the issue of Syrian chemical weapon use. “Suspicions are one thing. Evidence is another,” Hagel said. “I think we have to be very careful here before we make any conclusions, draw any conclusions, based on real intelligence.”

Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.

We are almost alone

April 25, 2013

We are almost alone – Israel Opinion, Ynetnews.

( Almost? I love optimists…. JW )

Op-ed: US will only go to war for its own interests. Against Iran and Syria, Israel almost on its own

Eitan Haber

Published: 04.25.13, 20:05 / Israel Opinion

Even if as we speak American aircraft are preparing to attack the nuclear facilities in Iran, and even if as we speak American Tomahawk missiles are searching for the chemical weapon storage facilities in Syria, the truth should not be concealed: In this war we are (almost) on our own.

America will only go to war for its own interests. In the current atmosphere in the United States, as it is withdrawing from its current wars, Washington will not go to war for Jerusalem. Israeli government officials will say that, allegedly, there is no greater contradiction: The Sunni world is closer to the State of Israel more than ever before these days. The Sunni world is terrified of the Shiite world representing Iran, and like the State of Israel – Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the Gulf states (perhaps apart from Qatar) and even Egypt see Iran and its satellites as enemies for all intents and purposes. These countries would gladly join a strike in Iran if it were possible.

But the Americans are not hiding their intentions in regards to Iran and likely in regards to Syria as well. They are still very far from dipping their fingers in the nuclear and chemical mud. President Obama did say publicly, in Israel, and in clear Hebrew, “You are not alone,” but the Americans are looking for every excuse to avoid risking their people’s lives on the road to Tehran.

The Americans are saying to themselves: We survived the Cold War and the Soviet nuclear threat, which has dozens and maybe hundreds of nuclear facilities, and we have nothing to be afraid of when it comes to the Iranian nukes. We got past Stalin, we got past Khrushchev (even with a series missile crisis in Cuba), and we’ll successfully get past Ahmadinejad too.

US constantly trying to clear the table

This is exactly what the Israelis are not thinking. Israel is not as spacious as the US; neither is it a world power unlike any other. Israel can estimate correctly the concern over any nuclear activity, after “foreign sources” have been claiming for years and generations that it has nuclear facilities. Israel also knows how the Iranians can deceive the entire world. Israel did it too and it can teach the Iranians every single trick.

It’s for a reason that the Americans are trying to delay the inevitable by arguing about timetables. On the Iranian issue, the timetable gap is pretty big and crosses every red line proudly drawn at the time by Benjamin Netanyahu in front of the UN General Assembly. On the Syrian issue, the Americans are searching everywhere for excuses not to recognize and admit the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime. The Americans know very well that admitting the use of chemical weapons in Syria means, most likely, war – or at least a long “day of battle” in which Syria will turn over and will never be the same again.

Indeed, America has promised Israel that “all options are on the table,” but it is constantly trying to clear the table. And so the apparent picture, in the days to come and at least in the near future, is that Israel, and the great IDF, are in this front against Iran and Syria almost on their own. The Americans, who understand Israel’s fears, are covering the thorny road to Tehran and Damascus with major purchase deals, which will likely be executed only after the “deluge.”

Iran says it’s ready to resume talks with world powers

April 25, 2013

Iran says it’s ready to resume talks with world powers – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Deputy nuclear negotiator Bagheri says Iran needs 20%-enriched uranium for Tehran research reactor, four others being built. ‘We are waiting for Ashton’s call,’ he adds

Reuters

Published: 04.25.13, 18:37 / Israel News

Iran is ready to resume talks with world powers on its disputed nuclear program and awaits word from the European Union on timing and details, Iran’s deputy nuclear negotiator said on Thursday.

Ali Bagheri, in an interview with Reuters in Geneva, said Iran needed 20%-enriched uranium for its Tehran research reactor and four others being built, and was continuing to convert some of its stockpile into reactor fuel.

“We are waiting for Lady Ashton to call Dr. Jalili, and Dr. Jalili is obviously ready to take the call,” Bagheri said.

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton oversees diplomatic contacts with Iran on behalf of the the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany. Saeed Jalili is Iran’s chief negotiator.

The world powers and Iran failed in talks in the Kazakh capital Almaty this month to end the deadlock in a decade-old dispute over Tehran’s nuclear program, prolonging a standoff that could yet spiral into a new Middle East war.

Previous nuclear talks in Kazakhstan (Archive photo: EPA)
Previous nuclear talks in Kazakhstan (Archive photo: EPA)

Iran says its nuclear work is entirely peaceful and that it is only refining uranium to power a planned network of nuclear energy plants and for medical purposes. Critics accuse it of covertly seeking the means to produce nuclear weapons.

A report by the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in February said Iran had in December resumed converting to oxide powder some of the uranium it has enriched to 20% fissile concentration, for the production of reactor fuel.

That helped restrain the growth of Iran’s higher-grade uranium stockpile, a development that could buy more time for diplomacy.

In a potentially encouraging sign for the powers, Bagheri said on Thursday this conversion continued.

“We produce 20% uranium to provide fuel for Tehran’s research reactor, also four other reactors in four different parts of Iran which are under construction. With this in mind, plans have been drawn up to convert 20% uranium to 20% oxide,” Bagheri said.

“This is very much going according to plan. This activity is ongoing,” he added.

Embarrassment all around

April 25, 2013

Israel Hayom | Embarrassment all around.

“For those who still need more evidence, the U.S. simply does not want to use military force in the region.”

Both the U.S. and Israel have been embarrassed following comments by the head of the Research Division at IDF Military Intelligence that the Syrian army used chemical weapons against rebel forces. The public differences of opinion with the U.S. administration have painted Israel into an uncomfortable, and mainly unplanned, corner. All this amid the flourishing strategic relations the two countries have enjoyed recently.

Brig. Gen. Itai Brun’s comment needs to be viewed in two ways: The visible and the essential. On the visible level, Brun erred egregiously. As someone who is privy to all the state’s secrets and decisions, he should have known he was crossing a red line and walking into a minefield. The fact that his superiors — the head of military intelligence (currently abroad), the chief of staff, the defense minister and the prime minister — were taken by surprise only made things worse, and his attempts behind closed doors Wednesday to clarify that his comments were only based on his own judgment and analysis were akin to putting out a forest fire with a few buckets of water.

One can assume that officials in Washington were not the only ones following this matter: It’s reasonable that Syrian officials were also wondering how Israel knows what weapons have been used and against whom. Offering a public appraisal of the situation, which normally takes place only behind closed doors, did not help solve the chemical weapons problem in Syria at all and merely served to create unnecessary suspicion between Washington and Jerusalem (which was forced to work overtime yesterday to reassure the Americans that they weren’t being manipulated into taking military action).

However, alongside the visible fallout, there is also a fundamental aspect underlying Brun’s comments — namely, for those who still need more evidence, the U.S. simply does not want to use military force in the region.

The rhetoric still seems to be clear: We won’t allow chemical weapons to be used in Syria or for a nuclear armed Iran. The translation of these words into action, however, is lacking. The Obama administration, which has just pulled out of Iraq and is still bleeding in Afghanistan, doesn’t want to be dragged into another conflict zone. It is searching for any excuse to avoid military action, even if this means casting doubt on a trustworthy ally’s seemingly solid intelligence information.

Israel must now navigate between these two levels in the hopes that Washington acts, but while avoiding unnecessary head-butting with it. The way to do this is to be synchronized, operationally, with intelligence information, and also with words.

Ya’alon: Diplomacy, sanctions haven’t stopped Iran’s centrifuges

April 25, 2013

Israel Hayom | Ya’alon: Diplomacy, sanctions haven’t stopped Iran’s centrifuges.

Israeli Ambassador to U.N. Ron Prosor: The Iranian nuclear program continues to advance at the speed of an express train, while the international community’s efforts to stop them are like a local train, pausing at every stop for nations to get off and on.

Israel Hayom Staff and News Agencies

 

Defense Minister Moshe (Bogie) Ya’alon says a viable military option for Iran’s nuclear program is required, even as a last resort.

|

Photo credit: Ziv Koren