Archive for April 2013

Explosives Detonated in Massachusetts Standoff – NYTimes.com

April 19, 2013

Explosives Detonated in Massachusetts Standoff – NYTimes.com.

Brian Snyder/Reuters

Police officers with guns drawn investigated in Watertown, Mass., early Friday morning.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Save
  • E-mail
  • Share
  • Print
  • Reprints

Two young men, armed with guns and explosives in what appeared to be backpacks, engaged in a violent standoff with dozens of police on a street in Watertown, Mass., Thursday night, police and residents said.

The New York Times

 

Dominick Reuter/European Pressphoto Agency

Police officers blocked off the scene of a shooting at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Mass.

At around 1 a.m., two residents said they heard what sounded like firecrackers began going off in Laurel St. When they looked out of their windows, they saw two young men taking cover behind a black Mercedes sports utility vehicle, in a shootout with dozens of police about 70 yards away. It marked the second violent episode late Thursday night and into early Friday morning. The chaos that descended on the residential streets came as the community was still reeling from Monday’s bombings at the Boston Marathon that killed three and wounded more than 170.

Andrew Kitzenberg, 29, said he looked out of this third floor window to see two young men of slight build in jackets engaged in “constant gunfire” with police officers. A police SUV “drove towards the shooters,” he said, and was shot at until it was severely damaged. It rolled out of control, Mr. Kitzenberg said, and crashed into two cars in his driveway.

The two shooters, he said, had a large and unwieldy bomb. “They lit it, still in the middle of the gunfire, and threw it. But it went 20 yards at most.” It exploded, he said, and one of the two men ran towards the gathered police officers. He was tackled, but it was not clear if he was shot, Mr. Kitzenberg said.

The explosions, said Loretta Kehayias, 65, another resident, “lit up the whole house. I screamed. I’ve never seen anything like this, never, never, never.”

Meanwhile, the other young man, said Mr. Kitzenberg, got back into the SUV, turned it toward officers and “put the pedal to the metal.” The car “went right through the cops, broke right through and continued west.”

The two men left “a few backpacks right by the car, and there is a bomb robot out there now.” Police had told residents to stay away from their windows, he said.

A police spokesman, Dave Procopio, told reporters that two suspects were accounted for in Watertown, but that it is not clear if there were others still at large. Explosives were involved, he confirmed, and bomb disposal units were active. He declined to comment on whether the incident was related to the bombs at the Boston marathon. The F.B.I. has officers on the scene and had spoken to two suspects who were in handcuffs.

At least two people were being taken from the scene in ambulances, said a resident who declined to give his name.

The standoff came days after two bombs had exploded at the Boston marathon, killing three and injuring more than 170. There was speculation that the two incidents were linked but, amid the chaos early Friday morning, there was no confirmation of that. The F.B.I. released new images of the men early Friday as part of a campaign to try and identify them.

The incident in Watertown came just minutes after a third explosion of violence in Boston — a campus police officer was shot and killed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The officer, who was not named, responded to a report of a disturbance near Vassar and Main Streets, the Middlesex County District Attorney Michael Pelgro said in a statement early Friday. He was found, the statement said with “multiple gunshot wounds” and taken to Massachusetts General Hospital where he was pronounced dead.

At the campus, helicopters whirred overhead, and police cars were dotted through the streets. A crime scene was cordoned off, and at least one dog unit was on the scene.

Jess Bidgood, Joan Nassivera, Anastasia Economides, and Jeremy Zilar contributed reporting.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: April 19, 2013

Police officer shot dead at MIT in attack suspected tied to Boston bombing

April 19, 2013

Police officer shot dead at MIT in attack suspected tied to Boston bombing.

DEBKAfile Special Report April 19, 2013, 9:39 AM (GMT+02:00)

 

The two Boston bombing suspects on film

An officer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus in Watertown near Boston was killed early Friday, April 19, when he responded to a disturbance caused by the appearance of two men armed with guns, explosives and wearing body armor. It is suspected they were preparing to seize a university building in a terror attack. After initial gunshots were heard at Building 32 on Vassar Street, dozens of SWAT teams, police moved toward the building, soon joined by FBI agents and a police helicopter. Gunfire and explosions were heard during the hunt for the killer indicating a gun battle in progress. One suspect is reported injured and taken to hospital under heavy guard. An MIT alert described the situation as active and extremely dangerous. One man is in custody, but it is not known whether he was involved. The situation remains unclear.

The incident occurred hours after the FBI released filmed images of two suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing on Monday with a request to the public for assistance in identifying them. A possible link between the two events is being intensely investigated.
debkafile reported earlier:

The FBI released Thursday images of two suspects filmed on the move at the site of the Boston Marathon bombings of Monday, April 15. The footage with stills has been widely distributed and an FBI Tipline set up. Public assistance in identifying the two youngish men is considered critical to the investigation.
Suspect 1 is shown wearing a black cap and, walking fast close behind him, Suspect 2 in a white cap. Both carry large black packages and both have Middle East complexions.
FBI Agent Richard Deslauriers who is in charge of the investigation said Suspect 1 planted the first bomb, while a few seconds later, Suspect 2 was filmed placing a package at the site of the second, more powerful bomb, and walking away very fast.
Both men are dangerous, he said, and should not be approached by the public

The images the FBI released of the two suspects have been floating around the Internet for the past 36 hours. And so the suspects must know they are being hunted. debkafile’s counterterrorism sources add that both have either gone to ground in a pre-arranged hideout or have left the United States. The way they walk behind each other as they pass through crowds without losing contact strongly recalls the formation maintained by the suicide bombers who blew up the London Tube train on July 7, 2007

Former top US officials: Lift Iran sanctions

April 19, 2013

Former top US officials: Lift Iran sanctions – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Thomas Pickering, Lee Hamilton, General Michael Hayden among former top officials who back report claiming US policies ‘may have narrowed the options for dealing with Iran by hardening the regime’s resistance to pressure’

Yitzhak Benhorin

Published: 04.19.13, 08:12 / Israel News

WASHINGTON – A panel of former senior American officials and outside experts expressed their support on Thursday for a document which calls on President Barack Obama to reconsider the harsh economic sanctions imposed on Iran.

The report, published by a panel called the Iran Project, said US policies “may have slowed but they have not stopped the advancement of Iran’s nuclear program. They have not led to a breakthrough in nuclear talks (sanctions have weakened Iran’s economy but not yet led to changed policies or actions); nor have they improved Iran’s human rights practices.”

According to the paper, titled “Strategic options for Iran: Balancing pressure with diplomacy,” US policies “may have narrowed the options for dealing with Iran by hardening the regime’s resistance to pressure… After 30 years of sanctioning and trying to isolate Iran, it seems doubtful that pressure alone will change the decision of Iran’s leaders… A strengthened diplomatic track that includes the promise of sanctions relief in exchange for verifiable cooperation could help to end the standoff and produce a nuclear deal.”
מצעד צבאי באיראן. "הסנקציות כבר לא עובדות" (צילום: AFP)

‘Balance has been misaligned.’ Military procession in Iran (Photo: AFP)

The former officials, including several who recently left the Obama administration, said in the letter of support that they “applaud the drafters of this paper and their goal of contributing an objective, nonpartisan analysis to a complex and important policy discussion.” However, they stressed they “do not necessarily agree with every word in this properly detailed and balanced report.”

Among those who signed the letter of support are Thomas Pickering, one of the most revered ambassadors in the history of US diplomacy; former Congressman Lee Hamilton, who served as the vice chairman of the 9/11 Commission; General Michael Hayden, who headed the CIA during George W. Bush’s presidency; and former Republican senator Richard Lugar.

Pickering, who served as ambassador to Israel, among other countries, told the New York Times “I fundamentally believe that the balance between sanctions and diplomacy has been misaligned,” and urged Obama to review the covert program against Iran – which has included computer sabotage of its nuclear facilities – to “stop anything that is peripheral, that is not buying us much time” in slowing Iran’s progress.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in a statement that the administration was sticking with its approach.

“We just completed a series of diplomatic talks” with America’s allies in dealing with Tehran, she said, “including three recent rounds of meetings that included Iran.” She added that a “dual track approach of rigorous sanctions and serious negotiations is the right approach. However, the onus is on Iran to take the next steps and move the process forward.”

Israel seeking to buy $2.67 billion in fuel from U.S.

April 19, 2013

Israel seeking to buy $2.67 billion in fuel from U.S. – Diplomacy & Defense – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

News comes in U.S. Department of Defense announcement.

 

By Gili Cohen | Apr.19, 2013 | 4:16 AM

 

An IAF plane flies over Sardinia.

An IAF aircraft flies over Sardinia. U.S. fuel will keep it flying. Photo by IDF Spokesman

 

The Israeli government is seeking to buy 864 million gallons of petroleum products from the United States, including jet and diesel fuel, at an estimated cost of $2.67 billion, the U.S. Department of Defense has announced.

 

The fuel is to be used mostly by Israel Air Force planes as well for the Israel Defense Forces’ land-based equipment.

 

Word of the request came in a U.S. Department of Defense notice stating, in part, that stated in part that “due to volatility in the oil market” the official notice of the purchase contained a request for “a total quantity of these various fuels rather than specific quantities of individual fuels.”

 

Israel has been buying jet fuel from the United States for years in connection with the American foreign aid program. In 2010, for example, Israel bought about $2 billion in jet fuel.

 

The quantity of jet fuel Israel has bought for the air force has risen substantially over the years. In 2008, for example, 186 million gallons were purchased as part of a $1.3 billion transaction that included other fuels.

 

In other defense developments, at his Independence Day reception earlier this week, referring to Iran’s nuclear program, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon said Israel had to plan for the possibility of defending itself alone.

 

IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz echoed this sentiment in radio interviews for Independence Day, saying the IDF was capable of attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities on its own.

 

U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is scheduled to arrive in Israel on Sunday for the first stop of a Middle East trip that will last about a week. He is slated to meet with President Shimon Peres, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and with Ya’alon, his Israeli counterpart.

 

Hagel is expected to pay a visit on Sunday to the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial and museum in Jerusalem. On Monday he is slated to take an aerial tour of Israel with Ya’alon.

 

The U.S. Defense Department has called Hagel’s visit a continuation of contacts following President Barack Obama’s trip here last month. The Iranian nuclear issue will be front and center in Hagel’s defense-related meetings here, along with the changing situation in Syria.

 

From Israel Hagel will travel to Jordan, where the implications of the civil war in Syria on that country will be discussed, before proceeding on to Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates.

Missiles fired into Israel from Gaza; no casualties recorded

April 19, 2013

Missiles fired into Israel from Gaza; no casualties recorded – Diplomacy & Defense – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

Less than a day after Eilat was hit by two missiles launched from across the Egyptian border, Eshkol Regional District was hit by missiles launched from within the Gaza Strip.

 

By | Apr.19, 2013 | 2:31 AM

 

 

A rocket in the Eshkol Regional Council.

A rocket in the Eshkol Regional Council. Photo by Eliyahu Hershkovitz

Two missiles were fired into Eshkol Regional Council and landed in open areas just before 11:00 P.M. The early warning system did not kick in, but no injuries were caused.

 

The attack came less than a day after Eilat was hit by missiles; on Wednesday morning, slighly after 9:00 A.M., a city-wide alam was heard in the southern city, calling residents to take cover. Moments later, loud explosions rocked the city. Security forces combed the city searching for the landing sites, and about half an hour later they were both located. One projectile hit the backyard of a construction site, and another landed in a minefield located near the Jordan border. These missiles, too, did not cause injuries or damage.

 

Flights were delayed at the Eilat international airport.

 

IDF personnell stated said that the Iron Dome defense system located within the city limits detected the incoming missiles, yet failed to operate against them.

 

A Salafi organization active in the Sinai peninsula took responsibility for the shootings.

‘Israel has right to prevent WMDs from falling into wrong hands’

April 19, 2013

Israel Hayom | ‘Israel has right to prevent WMDs from falling into wrong hands’.

Netanyahu tells BBC: Nonconventional weapons in the hands of terrorists would be regional game changer; Israel must defend itself against Syria’s chemical arms • Stopping militants from obtaining such weapons is “in other countries’ interest as well.”

Israel Hayom Staff
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu talking with the BBC on Thursday.

|

Photo credit: BBC (screen capture)

Will Khamenei make the same mistakes as Hitler?

April 19, 2013

Israel Hayom | Will Khamenei make the same mistakes as Hitler?.

Zalman Shoval

Has the time to make the final decision on a possible strike against Iran finally come? Judging by the evasive answers provided by the West and Russia following the recent round of nuclear talks in Kazakhstan — the answer is a resounding “no.” But if we listen to the undertone of the recent statements made by the White House and Congress the opposite may be true, as they suggest that in the absence of true progress in the diplomatic efforts vis-à-vis Iran, the United States is willing to consider realizing its military options.

Public opinion in the U.S. is also supportive, for the most part, of a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities, either by Israel or by the U.S. despite the general battle fatigue felt by the American public over the prolonged campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan and the objections noted in Washington to any intervention in Syria.

Even New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, whose opinion pieces often reflect the administration’s positions, recently wrote that U.S. President Barack Obama was “losing patience” with Tehran. The Washington Post claimed in a recent editorial that if there is still any “time and space for diplomacy with Iran” then Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s “red line” speech at the U.N. General Assembly in September should be credited. The speech, it said, “appears to have accomplished what neither negotiations nor sanctions have yielded: concrete Iranian action to limit its enrichment.”

This, of course, is relevant only if the regime in Tehran sees eye to eye with the international community and the U.S., which is highly unlikely.

Hitler’s biggest mistake during World War II was underestimating his enemies, especially the U.S., and having advisers who only told him what he wanted to hear. He believed the Americans would be reluctant to fight and that Britain would follow France and surrender. It is possible that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is making the same mistake.

It is not hard to imagine how a fictional intelligence officer briefing Khamenei on the chances of the West waging a military strike on Iran, would halfheartedly tell him that the moves made by the Americans after each round of talks, such as having an aircraft carrier sail through the Strait of Hormuz, or appointing John Kerry and Chuck Hagel (who opposed military action in the past) to the positions of state and defense secretaries, indicate that there is only a 20 percent chance of a military offensive.

As for Israel, the fictional intelligence officer would hedge that the introduction of a new government and the fact that various internal issues are now considered a higher priority than Iran’s nuclear ambitions, can also indicate that Israel’s determination is waning.

We cannot rule out the possibility that the Iranian leadership would take such intelligence assessments at face value, since they correspond with their beliefs. This may very well lead Khamenei to make the same mistakes as Hitler.

Public discourse in Israel over internal affairs is important, but it is safe to assume that Mrs. Cohen of Hadera and the people of Sderot know the difference between urgent internal affairs and the existential threat posed by a nuclear Iran. Israel must therefore make it absolutely clear that it is determined to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

Netanyahu’s statement on Holocaust Remembrance Day that “we will not leave our fate in the hands of others, even the best of our friends,” is a clear indication of that. Obama, during his visit in Israel in March reiterated that “the U.S. won’t stand back and allow Tehran to acquire such a nuclear weapon.” This was an important statement that cannot be taken lightly and in a few months, maybe even before the end of the year, both Israel and Iran will know what Obama meant.

Iran triples installations of centrifuges at Natanz

April 19, 2013

Israel Hayom | Iran triples installations of centrifuges at Natanz.

Tehran moves to speed up nuclear program despite sanctions, further fueling Western concerns over its nuclear advances • “A decade of diplomatic efforts has failed,” Western diplomat says.

Eli Leon, news agencies and Israel Hayom Staff
Iranian news reports the country’s nuclear progress.

|

Photo credit: Press TV screen grab

Iran’s army able to destroy Israel ‘alone’

April 19, 2013

Iran’s army able to destroy Israel ‘alone’ | News24.

2013-04-18 15:01

(File, AFP)

(File, AFP)

Tehran – Iran’s army “alone” is able to destroy Israel, army commander General Ataollah Salehi said on Thursday, responding to boasts by the Jewish state that its military that could attack its arch foe on its own.

“Our message to this illegitimate regime [Israel] is the same, we do not need to utilise all of Iran’s military forces,” Salehi said on the sidelines of the Islamic republic’s annual Army Day. “The army … alone is able to destroy Israel.”

His comments come after Israeli chief of staff Lieutenant General Benny Gantz on Tuesday said the Jewish state’s military was capable of attacking Iran on its own without foreign support.

Asked in an interview on public radio if the military could wage attacks on Iran “alone” – without the support of countries such as the United States – Gantz replied: “Yes, absolutely.”

Israel believes the Islamic republic, which has issued many bellicose statements about the Jewish state, is working to achieve a military nuclear capability and has not ruled out a military strike to prevent this happening.

Iran denies it is developing an atomic bomb and says it needs its nuclear programme of uranium enrichment for peaceful medical and energy purposes.

Drones

Israel is widely believed to be the Middle East’s sole nuclear-armed state, albeit undeclared.

Since the 1979 Islamic revolution Iran has had two military forces – the regular army and the elite Revolutionary Guards Corps, which controls the ballistic missile programme is believed by Western military experts to be the more powerful and the better equipped of the two.

During Thursday’s military parade, Tehran displayed what it said were three newly-developed unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones.

“The Sarir [throne] drone is a stealth, with a long range flight capability and is equipped with cameras and air-to-air missiles,” air defence commander Brigadier General Farzad Esmaili said as the aircraft went on display along with two other new drones, the Hazem-3 (firm) and Mohajer-B (immigrant).

Iran says it is developing drones to be used for surveillance as well as for attacks.

The Islamic republic regularly boasts of advances in the military and scientific fields, but western military experts often cast doubt on its claims.

At Ahmadinejad’s last army parade, Iran dismisses Israel as ‘a barking dog’

April 19, 2013

At Ahmadinejad’s last army parade, Iran dismisses Israel as ‘a barking dog’ – Middle East – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

Israeli threats to attack Iran’s nuclear sites are the harmless barking, Iran’s military said yesterday, marking the last Army Day ceremony of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s presidency with trademark anti-Israel rhetoric.

 

By Reuters | Apr.19, 2013 | 3:44 AM

 

 

Iranian soldiers marching during the Army Day parade in Tehran. April 18th, 2013.

Iranian soldiers marching during the Army Day parade in Tehran. April 18th, 2013. Photo by AFP

Israeli threats to attack Iran’s nuclear sites are the harmless barking of a dog, Iran’s military said yesterday, marking the last Army Day ceremony of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s presidency with trademark acerbic rhetoric against the Jewish state.

 

Ahmadinejad, who steps down at elections in June after eight years at the helm of the Islamic Republic’s government, has used the podium at previous Army Day parades to lash out at the United States and its allies.

 

Yesterday Ahmadinejad confined himself to praise of the country’s armed forces, and it was Iran’s ground forces commander Ataollah Salehi who spoke up against Iran’s sworn foe.

 

“A dog does nothing more than bark and we have no confidence in these threats,” Iran’s state news agency quoted him as saying.

 

With little progress reported at talks this month between Iran and world powers, Israel has reiterated that it reserves the right to resort to military operations to stop what it says is Iran’s attempt to build nuclear weapons. Iran has responded to Israel’s threat with regular combat drills, announcements of new advances in military technology and threatening statements of its own.

 

Iran denies it is seeking nuclear arms and says its atomic work is peaceful and aimed at generating electricity.

 

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who as commander in chief has ultimate authority over the armed forces, said last month the Islamic Republic would raze Tel Aviv and Haifa to the ground if Israel “made the slightest mistake.”

 

New hardware unveiled at yesterday’s parade included a radar-evading attack drone called Sarir, and updates to its air defense systems. The Iranian air force also put on display an air-refueling maneuver by Russian-made Sukhoi 24 fighter jets, Fars news agency reported.

 

Iranian officials regularly emphasize the country’s ability to develop and construct its own military hardware and announce sophisticated new equipment, but Western analysts say their real capabilities cannot be independently verified.

 

Sanctions have prevented the Islamic Republic from buying U.S. and European weaponry, and so the basis of Iran’s military hardware remains U.S. and Soviet equipment purchases made by the Shah of Iran before the 1979 revolution.