Archive for January 2013

Steinitz to press US on Iran sanctions loopholes

January 8, 2013

Steinitz to press US on Iran san… JPost – Iranian Threat – News.

By BLOOMBERG, JPOST.COM STAFF
01/08/2013 05:17
Finance minister says Iran questioning whether nuclear program worth cost as Tehran admits oil exports down 40% amid sanctions.

Finance minister Steinitz with Timothy Geithner.

Finance minister Steinitz with Timothy Geithner. Photo: Courtesy Ministry of Finance

Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz on Monday became the latest member of Israel’s cabinet and national security establishment to visit Washington to press senior US officials to lay out a tougher line on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear activities.

The time has come for US President Barack Obama to give Iran a “very clear ultimatum, very clear deadline combined with a very credible also military threat” Steinitz told a group of reporters Monday before planned meetings with Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and other administration officials.

Steinitz said he would tell Geithner that Israel views the financial sanctions imposed on Iran by the Obama administration as “very serious and very effective and the Iranian economy is in bad shape already now.”

The finance minister said he would discuss with Geithner and other White House and State Department officials what Israel perceives as loopholes in sanctions and Iran’s efforts to subvert legal restrictions. He declined to provide examples.

Steinitz said he is encouraged by the sanctions that are crippling Iran’s economy, and said it appears that “for the first time maybe at least some Iranians” are questioning whether the nuclear program is “worth the cost.”

Steinitz said Israel’s government is “not confident” to say that the sanctions alone will be sufficient to deter Iran from nuclear-weapons ambitions. The US needs to make clear that Iran will never be allowed to build nuclear weapons, so that any reasonable Iranian leaders should conclude that it is pointless to “suffer from the sanctions,” he said.

Asked if he thinks negotiations between Iran and six world powers, including the US, may yield a durable deal to avert any military action, he said he hopes “a sound and credible diplomatic solution” is possible.

Still, he said, sanctions alone — or sanctions combined with negotiations — are “insufficient” to stop Iran from continuing to pursue an atomic-bomb capability. The US must issue “a credible military threat” to persuade Iran’s leadership to abandon any nuclear military ambitions, he said.

“It seems they need something else” to “convince them to change their behavior, to make significant compromises at least for several years,” Steinitz said.

Iran’s oil exports down 40 percent

Steinitz’s visit came as Iranian oil minister Rostam Qasemi told the country’s budget and planning parliamentary commission on Monday that Iran’s oil exports have declined by 40 percent due to intensifying Western sanctions implemented over Tehran’s illicit nuclear program.

Oil exports have historically accounted for a large percentage of Iran’s national budget. In 2011, the Islamic republic relied on approximately $100 billion brought in by oil exports to cover 60% of its budget.

Over the last 9 months “there has been a 40% decline in oil sales and a 45% decrease in repatriating oil earnings,” Qasemi said. He previously had insisted that Western economic pressure was not significantly impeding Iran’s crude exports.

In July of last year, Western nations began leveling heavy sanctions against Iran’s energy sector, with the European Union prohibiting buying oil from Tehran. Iran’s crude sales to Asia, meanwhile, have been hit by an EU insurance ban on Iranian oil shipping and US sanctions against Tehran’s central bank.

As a result, according to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the International Energy Agency (IEA), Iranian oil exports have fallen from around 2.4 million barrels per day (mbpd) in 2011 to around 1.0 mbpd by the end of 2012.

Iran, once the second-biggest crude exporter in OPEC after Saudi Arabia, has slipped to fourth place, now trailing Iraq and Kuwait as well, according to the cartel’s figures.

Israel: State of Syrian chemical weapons could change in a moment

January 8, 2013

Israel: State of Syrian chemical weapons could change in a moment.

DEBKAfile Special Report January 8, 2013, 6:36 PM (GMT+02:00)

 

Syrian chemical weapons site
Syrian chemical weapons site

“Syria’s chemical weapons are under control for now, but no one in America or Israel can tell what the situation will be five minutes from now,” a senior Israeli defense official told debkafile Tuesday, Jan.8. The situation is dangerously fluid because there is no certainty about who is in control, or when some Syrian chemical unit commander may take it into his head to use it.”

There were two touch-and-go moments in the last two months – first, when Assad was on the verge of directing chemical arms to be used against the rebels; second, when Al Qaeda’s Jabhat al-Nusrah front fighting in rebel ranks came close to getting hold of them. The first occurred in the last week of November and the second in the last ten days of December.
The New York Times Tuesday reported that, in the first instance, Israel’s top military commanders called the Pentagon to discuss troubling intelligence showing up on satellite imagery that “Syrian troops appeared to be mixing chemicals at two storage sites, probably the deadly nerve gas sarin, and filling dozens of 500-pound bombs that could be loaded on airplanes.”

American sources then mobilized international forces, Russia, China, Turkey, Jordan and other Arab nations for sharply worded messages to the Syrian ruler Bashar Assad and his senior commanders to stop the mixing of chemicals and preparation of bombs. The sources did not say what persuaded Assad to halt the process. According to debkafile’s military sources, there was no direct threat of US or NATO military action in Syria.
Our sources add that, among the messages’ recipients, were commanders of the top secret Chemical Weapons Unit 450 of the Syrian Air Force. This brought to light for the first time that the US has developed direct channels of communications to Syrian unit commanders, including a top-secret air force outfit which has not so far taken part in the fighting.
According to debkafile’s American sources, the bombs filled with sarin were not dismantled and they are still sitting in stores at – or in close proximity to – Syrian air forces bases, ready for operational use at short notice.

This means that the Syrian ruler in effect flouted the American demand, although it was backed by Moscow, to dismantle the bombs.  In his defiant speech Sunday, Jan. 6, Assad made it clear that he “no longer takes dictation from anyone” – especially the West.

It is important to note that sarin nerve gas once mixed has a life of 60 days, after which it must be destroyed. More than half of this period has elapsed and so the Syrian ruler has until the end of January to decide how he wants to dispose of those deadly bombs.
The German newspaper Die Welt recently quoted the head of the BIND external intelligence service as estimating that he Syrian Air Force was able to have chemical weapons ready for operation within four to six hours from receiving an order. The New York Times believes that two hours would be enough.
Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, in a rare comment on the Syrian chemical weapons question, told a cabinet meeting that the Syrian regime is very unstable and “the question of chemical weapons here worries us.” He said that Israel was coordinating with the United States and others “so that we might be prepared for any scenario and possibility that could arise.”

Then, in an interview Monday, Netanyahu warned that world peace is under grave peril from the nuclear weapons under development in Iran and Syria’s chemical arms arsenal, which could reach the wrong hands. A senior security official told debkafile that the prime minister was referring to the repeated rebel assault on Syria’s largest chemical weapons depot at a=Al Safira near Aleppo, which has been repulsed by the Syrian army – for now.

Hezbollah sent 5,000 fighters to help Assad, daily reports

January 8, 2013

Hezbollah sent 5,000 fighters to help Assad, daily reports | The Times of Israel.

According to Al-Watan, members of the Shiite Lebanese militia have already killed 300 Syrian rebels

January 8, 2013, 3:19 am 2
Lebanese Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah, center, speaks to the crowd in a rare public appearance July 16, 2008 (photo credit: Ferran Queved)

Lebanese Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah, center, speaks to the crowd in a rare public appearance July 16, 2008 (photo credit: Ferran Queved)

Some 5,000 Hezbollah combatants entered Syria in December to aid the faltering regime of Bashar Assad, a Saudi daily reported on Monday.

According to Al-Watan, a government daily, four “support battalions” comprising at least 1,300 soldiers each had succeeded in killing some 300 rebel soldiers in recent weeks as battles raged between government and opposition forces around the capital Damascus. The fighters reportedly entered Syria through the border town of Madaya, located northwest of Damascus.

Hezbollah has remained staunchly allied with the Assad regime throughout the popular uprising in Syria that began in March 2011. Syria has served as a conduit of logistical support and weapons sent to Lebanon from Iran.

A number of Lebanese bloggers have reported funerals conducted by Hezbollah recently for fighters killed in action in Syria, Jordanian daily Al-Ghad reported on Monday.

In early October, a Hezbollah commander, Ali Hussein Nassif, was reportedly killed by an opposition ambush near the Syrian city of Homs along with a number of other fighters when a roadside bomb destroyed the vehicle he was driving.

Iran’s nuclear bomb program complete

January 8, 2013

Iran’s nuclear bomb program complete.

Source reveals secret site; last obstacle is to arm missiles

Published: 11 hours ago

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/irans-nuclear-bomb-program-complete/#6UqQJS5fyqhd6t2R.99

Israeli Intel to Obama Stopped Syrian Chemical War

January 8, 2013

Israeli Intel to Obama Stopped Syrian Chemical War – Defense/Security – News – Israel National News.

Israeli surveillance spotted Syria preparing chemical bombs. Israel alerted Obama, who gained Russian support to stop Assad.

By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

First Publish: 1/8/2013, 11:00 AM
Chemical attack drill (file)

Chemical attack drill (file)
Israel news photo: Flash 90

Israeli surveillance that spotted Syria preparing chemical bombs to load them on airplanes spurred President Barack Obama into action to win rare support from Russia to stop the plan, The New York Times reported Tuesday.

The report follows bits of information published over the past several weeks, according to which Syrian soldiers were spotted mixing chemicals, but details of Israeli surveillance and American involvement were not previously disclosed.

IDF commanders informed Washington in November, according to the newspaper, after satellite imagery showed Syrian soldiers filling 500-pound bombs with a substance that may have been the deadly “sarin” nerve gas.

Further reports by Israeli revealed that the bombs has been loaded onto vehicles near Syrian air bases, where Assad’s planes could use them within two hours, too late for the United States to intervene militarily.

The New York Times reported that “a remarkable show of international cooperation” over the civil war in Syria found Russia and China agreeing with the United States and working to stop Assad through diplomatic channels.

The report may explain analysts’ statements that Russia has taken control of Assad’s chemical weapons stockpiles.

The immediate threat of a chemical attack on Syrians has been averted, but the threat remains as Assad continues to follow the path of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and murdered Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, both of whom denied the reality of revolutions against their power.

One senior defense official told the New York newspaper that while Russia may have finally understood that Washington is prepared to intervene in the civil war if Assad uses chemical weapons, it is “ anyone’s guess” if Assad got the message.

Israeli civilians would be under a direct threat of a deadly chemical attack if Assad unleashes the weapons. Shifting winds could blow the chemicals over the Israel border.

Syrian opposition forces have shown vivid photos and videos of Syrians already having been exposed to chemical gas attacks.

Israel media have reported that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu recently traveled to Jordan to discuss how to deal with the chemical war threat from Syria, which could easily transfer the chemical bombs to Hizbullah, if it already has not done so.

Jeremy Binnie, a terrorism and insurgency specialist at IHS Jane’s Defense Weekly, was quoted by the Times as saying that Hizbullah terrorists “who got their hands on such munitions would find it difficult to deploy them effectively without the associated aircraft, artillery or rocket launcher systems. That said, Hizbullah would probably be able to deploy them effectively against Israel with a bit of help.”

Iran says it’s hopeful on Hagel nomination

January 8, 2013

Iran says it’s hopeful on Hagel nomination – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Tehran says Hagel’s appointment as US defense secretary could improve relations between Iran and US; expects ‘practical changes’ to US policy

Associated Press

Published: 01.08.13, 11:14 / Israel News

Iran‘s Foreign Ministry says it is hopeful the appointment of former Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel to lead the Pentagon would improve relations between Tehran and the US.

Asked about Hagel’s nomination, ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said Tuesday that Tehran was hopeful that there would be “practical changes” to US foreign policy, and that nations would change their attitude towards the US if it respected their rights.

Hagel was nominated Monday and faces tough confirmation hearings. Critics have said he is hostile toward Israel and soft on Iran.

Washington and Tehran have no diplomatic relations since 1979 when Iranian militants stormed the US embassy and took American diplomats hostages.

Tensions have spiked over America’s belief that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapon, a charge Iran denies.

Shortly after being nominated as the next US secretary of defense, Hagel said his record shows “unequivocal, total support for Israel,” insisting that critics have misrepresented his views on the Jewish state.

In an interview with the Lincoln Journal Star, Hagel also dismissed claims that he was soft on Iran.

Chemical Weapons Showdown With Syria Led to Rare Accord – NYTimes.com

January 8, 2013

Chemical Weapons Showdown With Syria Led to Rare Accord – NYTimes.com.

Muzaffar Salman/Reuters

The violence in Syria continued on Monday. Above, Syrians went to the aid of a man who was wounded when a missile hit the al-Mashhad district of Aleppo.

 

 

WASHINGTON — In the last days of November, Israel’s top military commanders called the Pentagon to discuss troubling intelligence that was showing up on satellite imagery: Syrian troops appeared to be mixing chemicals at two storage sites, probably the deadly nerve gas sarin, and filling dozens of 500-pounds bombs that could be loaded on airplanes.

 

Within hours President Obama was notified, and the alarm grew over the weekend, as the munitions were loaded onto vehicles near Syrian air bases. In briefings, administration officials were told that if Syria’s increasingly desperate president, Bashar al-Assad, ordered the weapons to be used, they could be airborne in less than two hours — too fast for the United States to act, in all likelihood.

 

What followed next, officials said, was a remarkable show of international cooperation over a civil war in which the United States, Arab states, Russia and China have almost never agreed on a common course of action.

 

The combination of a public warning by Mr. Obama and more sharply worded private messages sent to the Syrian leader and his military commanders through Russia and others, including Iraq, Turkey and possibly Jordan, stopped the chemical mixing and the bomb preparation. A week later Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta said the worst fears were over — for the time being.

 

But concern remains that Mr. Assad could now use the weapons produced that week at any moment. American and European officials say that while a crisis was averted in that week from late November to early December, they are by no means resting easy.

 

“I think the Russians understood this is the one thing that could get us to intervene in the war,” one senior defense official said last week. “What Assad understood, and whether that understanding changes if he gets cornered in the next few months, that’s anyone’s guess.”

 

While chemical weapons are technically considered a “weapon of mass destruction” — along with biological and nuclear weapons — in fact they are hard to use and hard to deliver. Whether an attack is effective can depend on the winds and the terrain. Sometimes attacks are hard to detect, even after the fact. Syrian forces could employ them in a village or a neighborhood, some officials say, and it would take time for the outside world to know.

 

But the scare a month ago has renewed debate about whether the West should help the Syrian opposition destroy Mr. Assad’s air force, which he would need to deliver those 500-pound bombs.

 

The chemical munitions are still in storage areas that are near or on Syrian air bases, ready for deployment on short notice, officials said.

 

The Obama administration and other governments have said little in public about the chemical weapons movements, in part because of concern about compromising sources of intelligence about the activities of Mr. Assad’s forces. This account is based on interviews with more than half a dozen military, intelligence and diplomatic officials, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the intelligence matters involved.

 

The head of Germany’s foreign intelligence service, the BND, warned in a confidential assessment last month that the weapons could now be deployed four to six hours after orders were issued, and that Mr. Assad had a special adviser at his side who oversaw control of the weapons, the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel reported. Some American and other allied officials, however, said in interviews that the sarin-laden bombs could be loaded on planes and airborne in less than two hours.

 

“Let’s just say right now, it would be a relatively easy thing to load this quickly onto aircraft,” said one Western diplomat.

 

How the United States and Israel, along with Arab states, would respond remains a mystery. American and allied officials have talked vaguely of having developed “contingency plans” in case they decided to intervene in an effort to neutralize the chemical weapons, a task that the Pentagon estimates would require upward of 75,000 troops. But there have been no evident signs of preparations for any such effort.

 

The United States military has quietly sent a task force of more than 150 planners and other specialists to Jordan to help the armed forces there, among other things, prepare for the possibility that Syria will lose control of its chemical weapons.

 

Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was reported to have traveled to Jordan in recent weeks, and the Israeli news media have said the topic of discussion was how to deal with Syrian weapons if it appeared that they could be transferred to Lebanon, where Hezbollah could lob them over the border to Israel. But the plans, to the extent they exist, remain secret.

 

American, Israeli and other allied officials remained fixed on this potential crisis, especially as the opposition appears to have gained more momentum, seizing several Syrian military bases and the weapons stored there, and have been closing in on Damascus, the Syrian capital.

 

In response, Syria has reached deeper into its conventional arsenal, including firing Scud ballistic missiles at rebel positions near Aleppo. Over the past week a new concern emerged: Syrian forces began shooting new, accurate short-range missiles, believed to have been manufactured in Iran. None had chemical warheads. But their use showed that the Syrian military was now deploying a more accurate weapon than the notoriously inaccurate Scud missiles they have used in previous attacks.

 

As the fighting has escalated, American and other allied officials have said that government troops have moved some of the chemical stockpiles to safer locations, a consolidation that, if it continues, could actually help Western forces should they have to enter Syria to seize control of the munitions or destroy them.

 

Syria’s chemical weapons are under the control of a secretive Syrian air force organization called Unit 450, a highly vetted outfit that is deemed one of the most loyal to the Assad government given the importance of the weapons in its custody.

 

American officials said that some of the back-channel messages in recent weeks were directed at the commanders of this unit, warning them — as Mr. Obama warned Mr. Assad on Dec. 3 — that they would be held personally responsible if the government used its chemical weapons.

 

Asked about these communications and whether they have been successful, an American intelligence official said only, “The topic is extremely sensitive, and public discussion, even on background, will be problematic.”

 

Allied officials say whatever safeguards the Syrian government have taken, there remains great concern that the weapons could fall into the hands of Islamist extremists fighting the government or the militant group Hezbollah, which has established small training camps near some of the storage sites.

“Militants who got their hands on such munitions would find it difficult to deploy them effectively without the associated aircraft, artillery or rocket launcher systems,” said Jeremy Binnie, a terrorism and insurgency specialist at IHS Jane’s Defense Weekly.

The Hagel litmus test – Washington Post

January 7, 2013

The Hagel litmus test.

By Jennifer Rubin , Updated: January 6, 2013

If Republicans had nervy firebrands like the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, someone would rise up to declare, “Chuck Hagel’s America is a land in which gays would be forced back in the closet and Jews would be accused of dual loyalty. Chuck Hagel’s world is one in which devastating defense cuts become a goal, not a problem; we enter direct talks with the terrorist organization Hamas; and sanctions on Iran wither.”

The Hagel nomination expected to come on Monday is so outrageous and the rationale for his nomination so weak that it becomes an easy no vote for all Republicans. Phillip Terzian aptly sums up the problems with Hagel that go beyond his extreme views: “Simply stated, there is no evidence that Chuck Hagel has the experience or temperament to master the gigantic defense establishment, or deal effectively with Congress on delicate issues. On the contrary, there is every indication that he would quickly suffocate in the details of running the Pentagon, and run afoul of his political masters in the White House.”

Unlike the Democratic Party, support for the U.S.-Israel relationship has become a positive litmus test for national office in the GOP, in large part due to the intensely pro-Israel Christian conservatives. The opposition to Hagel will be fierce. At the very least the battle will potentially suck up much of the oxygen in the Senate, put other issues like gun control on hold and threaten to become the blockbuster hearing of the Obama presidency as the Judge Robert Bork hearing was in the Reagan administration.

But this is not merely about Israel or Iran policy or defense spending. It is about the acceptability of the worst expression of anti-Semitism, the accusation of disloyalty. There is no other meaning to Hagel’s phrase “Jewish lobby.” The declaration from Hagel that he is not “the senator from Israel” (Who said he should be?) is again a direct attack on Jews’ fidelity to the United States. For decades this kind of venomous language has been gaining acceptance in Europe. But never in America. In elevating Hagel the president in a real and troubling way moves us closer to Western Europe. Indeed the most disturbing aspect of Hagel’s nomination is not his impact on policy (President Obama has and will continue to make one blunder after another), but what it says about the U.S. president’s willingness to embrace a man espousing the world’s oldest hatred.

The nomination will trigger a batch of litmus tests for various political groupings:

The 2016 GOP presidential contenders. Who will move boldly not to say he or she has “concerns” but he or she will do whatever it takes to block the nomination?

The 2016 Democratic presidential contenders. The Hagel pick becomes a burden for Vice President Biden and even for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when they are forced to defend him publicly. Why didn’t they use their good offices to urge the president take another tact? And will savvy pols like New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley take the opportunity to step into the national limelight to speak out against a nominee who questioned the loyalty of Jewish Americans?

Jewish organizations. Many like the Anti-Defamation League, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the American Jewish Committee have already spoken up and will continue to pan the choice. AIPAC almost certainly will remain quiet on the theory that to do otherwise would destroy the appearance of bipartisan support for Israel. But would it really invite senators who vote yes to be honored at its March national convention? If the organization will remain officially neutral, individual members certainly will not.

Pro-Israel Democrats. They’ve defended the president and turned out in huge numbers to reelect him. But now the president embraces a man who has accused American Jews of standing apart from their country and at odds with its best interests (“Jewish Lobby”). There is no way to countenance a nominee who speaks of Jews as a Fifth Column. If the president were to declare opposition to late-term abortions or embrace an nominee who repeatedly spoke in disparaging terms about African Americans, they would be up in arms. Do they mutely accept this outrage and  line up behind the president? (One recalls the Jewish “leaders” of the 1930′s too afraid of making a fuss to take on FDR when it came to rescuing the Jews of Europe.)

Pundits. Mainstream media pundits and cable talking heads would go ballistic if a Republican president nominated a cabinet secretary who was so overtly anti-Israel, went to battle against gays serving in government or opposed Iran sanctions. In fact they’ve done just that when the provocateur was Rick Santorum or Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.). So what do they do now? Be obedient spinners for the president or show some intellectual consistency (for once)? Will any TV interviewers grill the president, his advisers or Senate Democrats on the Hagel pick?

Senate Democrats. Senate Democrats, especially those up for re-election in 2014 (e.g.,  Minnesota’s Al Franken, Michigan’s Carl Levin, Illinois’ Dick Durbin, Virginia’s Mark Warner) will face a vote that can’t be fudged. It is a binary choice: Do they approve Hagel’s rhetoric and extremist views or not? He is far out of the mainstream of both parties on everything from Russian anti-Semitism (his 99 colleagues implored Russia to cease anti-Semitic conduct, but not he!) to Hamas to Iran sanctions.  In addition, potential Democratic candidates (e.g., Massachusetts’s Ed Markey, New Jersey’s Cory Booker) will come under tremendous heat to stand up to the president on this one.

Republican candidates. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has often felt the heat from the right for going easy on Democratic presidents’ nominees, but here is a chance for him to stand tall, engage in ferocious questioning and lead the opposition. Likewise, if Scott Brown is going to make it back to the Senate, he will likely feel compelled to weigh in.

In short the nomination will confirm suspicions the right harbors about Obama (he doesn’t like Israel, he takes Jewish voters for granted, he is weak on defense). They can with much justification claim that Obama is revealing his true preferences and instincts, which lead him to go to the mat for the most anti-Israel nominee in recent memory (in either party). Because it is such a powerful bit of evidence in the right’s favor, a Hagel nomination then forces an early decision in the second Obama term for Senate Democrats: Do they tie themselves to the fate of a lame-duck president who no longer needs to keep up the pretense of moderation or do they put some daylight between themselves and Obama?

A final note: Republicans should be circumspect about tossing around the word filibuster. In this case, the real pressure is on Senate Democrats, who ideally should be compelled to vote, not be spared by shifting the argument to one about process and denying the president an up-or-down vote. On the contrary, Republicans should insist that the hearings be exhaustive and timely. Unlike the budget, this will be a distasteful vote Senate Democrats cannot ignore. And most of all it will settle the argument about the president’s attitudes toward Israel and the American Jewish community.

The approaching Hagel storm

January 7, 2013

Israel Hayom | The approaching Hagel storm.

The sound of swords being sharpened is resounding throughout the Capitol as U.S. President Barack Obama appoints former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel as secretary of defense in place of Leon Panetta. Senators are anticipating a great confirmation battle.

The signs of an impending storm are already visible. Hagel’s highly critical stance toward Israel stands out as one of the central arguments of those senators from both parties who oppose the appointment. Another key argument revolves around Hagel’s opposition to military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities, and his preference that the U.S. negotiate with Iran rather than bomb it.

Only last week, President Obama publicly voiced his admiration of Hagel, a twice-decorated soldier in the Vietnam War. The two men see eye-to-eye on the need to make extensive cuts to the defense budget, and Obama expects Hagel can pull off such cuts in a time of economic crisis. In everything concerning U.S. involvement overseas, Hagel can be described as an isolationist and dove.

Pro-Israel lobbyists in Washington are already preparing for the big showdown over Hagel’s appointment. They have no qualms about urging senators to vote against Hagel at the end of the critical, likely fascinating confirmation hearing. Some Israel advocates will even judge a senator’s pro-Israel bona fides on the basis of how they vote on this appointment. The moment of truth is approaching, and mere words of support for Israel will not cut it.

It is no surprise that one of the most enthusiastic supporters of Hagel’s candidacy is Pat Buchanan — a conservative media personality and politician who has run for president in the past. Over the years, including in an interview I conducted with him, Buchanan has opposed all American economic aid to Israel, no matter the political stripe of the government in Jerusalem. Buchanan also supports dialogue between the United States and Hamas or Hezbollah.

On the other side of the divide stands Abe Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League, who has openly opposed Hagel’s appointment. At the same time, many important American media commentators enthusiastically favor the Hagel nomination, including Thomas Friedman of The New York Times.

Obama had to pass over his first choice for secretary of state, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice. Strong opposition in Congress nixed the nomination, despite Rice being very close to the president.

Was Rice’s rejection a preview of what we can expect to see with Hagel’s nomination? Unlikely. At the beginning of his second term, Obama will not accept another defeat and will do everything in his power to make sure Hagel is appointed.

Ahead of Chuck Hagel, John Brennan nominations, US intel official in Cairo

January 7, 2013

Ahead of Chuck Hagel, John Brennan nominations, US intel official in Cairo.

DEBKAfile Special Report January 7, 2013, 5:27 PM (GMT+02:00)

 

Chuck Hagel nominated US Defense Secretary

As Washington prepared for new appointments to the Obama cabinet, the US president dispatched US Undersecretary for Defense Intelligence Michael Vickers to Cairo Sunday, Jan. 12 on a two-day mission to try and revitalize the counter-terror war on two key fronts: post-Qaddafi Libya and Egyptian Sinai. debkafile’s Washington sources report that President Barack Obama hastened to address these fronts, because he expected the five-month old murder of US Ambassador Christ Stevens in Benghazi by al Qaeda to come up at congressional hearings and hamper the endorsement of ex-Senator Chuck Hagel as defense secretary and John Brennan as Central Intelligence Director. Their appointments were to be announced Monday, Jan. 7.
Hagel faced a preliminary storm over his attitudes on Israel and Iran, whereas Brennan, as counterterrorism adviser to the president, has been responsible for shaping administration policy in this sphere in Libya, Egypt and the Sinai Peninsula.
The United States has still not taken steps against the Libyan Ansar al-Sharia group, which assassinated the ambassador and three US staffers on Sept. 11. 2012, and numbered Egyptian al Qaeda jihadis who came in from Cairo.

This cross-alliance still functions with impunity as the Libyan group enforces its control over large areas of Benghazi and eastern Libya, funded by the smuggling of arms from Libya and pumping them into the big smuggling pipelines running through Sinai via Egypt.

Jihadist terror is also rampant in Sinai.  On Nov. 21, President Obama, in a phone call to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, pledged the immediate deployment of US troops for leading a comprehensive Egyptian campaign against the al Qaeda and Salafist Bedouin extremists who have settled in northern and central Sinai after driving the Egyptian administration out. This pledge was part of the ceasefire deal which ended Israel’s Gaza Strip operation. But so far, according to our military and counterterrorism sources, very little has been done except for a visit to Sinai by a small study group of American officers and servicemen.
The delay is accounted for mainly by the weighty challenges confronting Egyptian President Mohamed Mors in the last couple of months. Morso is practically the only office-holder in Cairo ready to endorse an covert military US operation in Sinai for eradicating the terrorist bane. Egyptian Defense Minister Gen. Abdel-Fattah Al-Sissi was his only ally, but in recent weeks the Egyptian army has come out against an anti-al Qaeda expedition in Sinai.

The security situation there is constantly deteriorating as Egypt struggles to retain some grip on the territory. In mid-December, the defense minister in Cairo quietly issued an order, with made hardly a ripple outside Egypt, “restricting the right to buy property in Sinai to second-generation Egyptian citizens.”

This prohibition was made necessary, our sources disclose, by the land grab in force by partnerships of Persian Gulf tycoons, mainly Qatar, and Gazan Palestinian, mostly Hamas adherents. They were quietly snapping up choice coastal strips of Sinai to gain control of the peninsula’s Mediterranean and Gulf of Aqaba shores, as well as the western and eastern regions.

The Egyptian military passed the new law to save the territory from slipping out of its hands to Palestinian Hamas and Gulf oil interests.  Hamas is also believed to be in cahoots with allies in the armed terrorist groups of Libya and Sinai.

Delayed American action in Sinai has produced three results:

1.  The Sinai arms smuggling route (which also serves Iran) is thriving as never before. The expanded earnings of Ansar al-Sharia are bolstering its grip on power in Libya;
2.  Sinai has been allowed to evolve into al Qaeda’s primary operational-logistical hub for Africa and the Middle East, its jumping-off base for action in Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Somalia, Saudi Arabia and Yemen;
3.  In the absence of any resistance, al Qaeda is bringing its positions close to the Israeli border. All Egyptian military efforts to curtail the terrorist creep into the northern Sinai towns of El Arish and Rafah have had no effect.
Sunday, Jan. 6, a band of Salafist Bedouin came up to a parked car on the El Arish main street and shot the driver dead. debkafile reports that the victim, one of the top men in Egypt’s counter-terror campaign in northern Sinai, was on a surveillance mission in civilian dress. The terrorists knew who he was – indicating they have established a clandestine presence inside Egypt’s security services.