Archive for January 20, 2013

France’s involvement in Africa – victory or defeat?

January 20, 2013

France’s involvement in Africa – victory or defeat? | David Altman | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel.

France’s military involvement in Africa should concern us all, not because of their involvement, but because of France’s lack of decisiveness, and, moreover, the absence of broad support from its European partners and the from United States in France’s involvement. From time to time, the world awakens to the growing threat of Islamist terrorism to the West, its culture, its independence, and its way of life. However, following such awakenings, the West, in the end, displays a lack of willingness to conduct a real battle and take  an unequivocal stand on issues of civilian security.

Durin the Clinton administration, America engaged in an “adventure” in Somalia. Somalia returned the threat of maritime piracy to the global agenda. Somalia is an anarchic state with no respect for international law and order, wholly dedicated to terrorism, which it forced upon the Indian Ocean. Somalia brought the world back to an era of piracy, which is generally associated with fantastic Holywood films. America’s involvement in Somalia failed miserably, as President Bill Clinton directed the American forces to pack their bags and flee by the skins of their teeth, fearing defeat at the hands of the terrorist organization that had taken over in 1993.

Clinton’s behavior in Somalia is reminiscent of the behavior of the United States during the seizure of hostages in Tehran in 1979. The American Embassy in Tehran was occupied by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, a sign of complete disrespect to America. The hesitancy of President Carter brought about 444 days of humiliation and daily disgrace of the great superpower, and keep silent in the face of events culminating in U.S. army landing in the Iranian desert, destroyed before real battle could ensue, due to unwillingness to engage in true military combat.

Going to war against Afghanistan and Iraq following the events of September 11, returned a certain pride to the American public, as the people felt that their leadership was prepared to take the front to enemy territory, particularly following shock and horror of massive terror attacks on the most important symbols of the American way of life. But with the passage of time and the difficulties of these wars,  American isolationism increased, and the United States began its retreat from  Afghanistan and Iraq, even though these countries continue to threaten her as before.

Furthremore, North Korea is challenging the United States and its allies in Asia, but West seemed hesitant in its ability to respond, as North Korean provocations remain unchallenged.

More recently, the United States was dragged by Turkey and Qatar to overthrow Gaddafi, but has since refrained from interfering in any way in the continuing post-Qadafi civil war that is taking place there. The United States previously attempted to court Bashar Assad , and supported Turkey’s attempt to impose a peace settlement on Israel, but in the end took the side of an Islamist coalition which has revolted against the Assad regime, in order to end minority rule over Syria, and enable what will surely turn out to be Islamist rule. However, again in Syria, the West has lacked the unequivocal determination in order to end the bloodshed and facilitate a new future for Syria.

Africa has become an international arena for extremist Islamic forces, as the fingerprints of radical Islamic organizations are evident across the continent. Algeria, which held a democratic election in which Islamists were victorious, is conducting a long, bloody war against fundamentalist organizations. Hundreds of thousands of casualties on all sides continue to flood the country with rivers of blood. The West observes with anxiety, but does nothing. Although the Islamists won democratic elections in Algeria, the military and secular forces have denied their victory, and civil war has ensued.

Islamic forces’ control of Mali, a country with an area larger than France, is a threat not only to West Africa, but also the whole of Europe. Islamists do not pretend that lovers of freedom, democracy or peace, but show their true faces to the world without fear or prejudice, and attempt to destroy all the values that the West holds dear, arguing that these values are contradictory to Islam. France faces this enemy alone, as its Western allies have yet to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with France in the face of this challenge.

It would appear that the West hesitant when engaging in self-defense. In areas occupied by radical Islam, Mali has become a terrorist state, where terrorists which kidnap civilians and ransom the West, while serving as an intermediary between South America, the Middle East and Europe in drug trafficking. Despite Islamic terror posing an existential threat to the West, its opposition is hesitant and equivocal.

The West only threatens countries where it is confident of victory, but fearful of getting involved other areas where success is not guaranteed.

Therefore, allies of the West must be concerned, as Mubarak and even Gaddafi, who agreed to disband his assets nuclear and weapons of mass destruction, understood in their last moments that Western support could not be counted on, as terrorism and fundamentalists raise their heads in the face of a weakened West, which was once considered all-powerful, and today appears limp and frightened.

The West appers to be repeating the policies of Chamberlain at the onset of the Second World War, who preached concessions, and believed that willingness to compromise was indicative ofreal power, and that defeatism is the way to world peace, termed by Chamberlain “peace in our time.”

The Mali crisis should serve as a warning to the West and the free world, and such “writing on the wall” often serves as prophesy of events in the not-too-distant future.

Israel, Iran and Iraq

January 20, 2013

Israel, Iran and Iraq | Tuvia Book | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel.

As Israel readies itself for its general election in two days time a lot of Israelis are thinking about the Iranian threat.  In 1981, Thirty-two years ago, Iraq, the country adjacent to Iran, was extremely close, with enthusiastic help from both France and Italy, to completing a nuclear reactor in Osiraq which would have been able to produce weapons grade nuclear material.  This was a clear and present danger to the Jewish State.  The world, after imposing ineffectual and frequently ignored sanctions, was doing a lot of talking about the situation.

With the diplomatic option not producing the required results, and with time rapidly running out, Israel’s then Prime Minister Menachem Begin (who had lost many immediate family members in the Holocaust) summoned the head of the Israeli air force, who consulted with his chief of strategic planning, Ilan Ramon (later to become Israel’s first Astronaut aboard the ill-fated Columbia, whose tenth anniversary is currently being commemorated).  Ramon conceived the almost desperate, yet incredible, idea of flying two thousand miles over hostile territory extremely close to the ground, to avoid enemy radar, and destroy the Iraqi reactor with specially designed bombs, and somehow return safely to Israel without refueling.  Against all the odds, “Operation Opera,” as it was dubbed, succeeded.

Whilst the Israeli pre-emptive strike was widely condemned in international circles, it prevented a sworn enemy of the Jewish state from acquiring the means to destroy it.  American troops were much relieved a decade later when they invaded a nuclear-free Iraq.

Yitzhak Shamir noted that:

Deterrence was not attained by other countries – France and Italy – and even the United States. It was attained by the State of Israel and its Prime Minster who decided, acted and created a fact that no one in the world today – with the exception of our enemies – regrets.

Fast-forward three decades.  This time it is Iraq’s neighbour, Iran that is extremely close to producing weapons grade nuclear material.  Iran has frequently threatened to destroy the “Zionist entity.”  Despite the fact that the sanctions are more effective this time round, the Mullahs of Iran are still racing towards the finish line.  The world is doing a lot of talking about the situation.  The big question is, who will be Israel’s Menachem Begin and Ilan Ramon this time?  To paraphrase; “It does not matter what the nations of the world say, it matters what the Jews do!”

Khamenei aide: Toppling Assad “red line” for Iran

January 20, 2013

Khamenei aide: Toppling Assad “red line” f… JPost – Middle East.

By REUTERS
01/20/2013 15:39
Ali Akbar Velayati warns against overthrow of Syrian president, says “line of resistance in the face of Israel will be broken.”

Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Photo: REUTERS

DUBAI – A senior aide to Iran’s supreme leader warned against the overthrow of Syria’s President Bashar Assad, saying his fate was a “red line”, in one of the Islamic state’s strongest messages of support for the Damascus government.

Iran has steadfastly backed Assad’s rule since an uprising against his rule began almost two years ago and regards him as an important part of the axis of opposition against arch-foe Israel.

“If the Syrian President Bashar Assad is toppled, the line of resistance in the face of Israel will be broken,” Ali Akbar Velayati, who is seen as a potential contender in Iran’s June presidential election, said in an interview broadcast on Sunday.

“We believe that there should be reforms emanating from the will of the Syrian people, but without resorting to violence and obtaining assistance from the (United States of) America,” he told Lebanon’s Al-Mayadeen satellite television.

Asked if Iran sees Assad as a red line, Velayati said: “Yes, it is so. But this does not mean that we ignore the Syrian people’s right in choose its own rulers.”

More than 60,000 people have died in the uprising against Assad, part of the Arab Spring protests that have swept aside four heads of state since 2011.

Iran, a regional Shi’ite Muslim power which backs Lebanon’s Hezbollah group, describes many Syrian opposition groups as “terrorists” who are backed by Western and Arab states. Assad follows an offshoot of Shi’ite Islam.

Velayati blamed what he called “reactionary” Arab states for the violence in Syria and singled out Qatar, accusing it of bringing in fighters from Somalia and Afghanistan to help topple Assad.

Velayati said all parties linked to the crisis in Syria needed to negotiate.

“Anyone who comes to the talks cannot negotiate on the table and support the armed elements, but must enter the negotiations and stop supporting the armed elements,” he added.

The Islamic Republic has sought international backing for its six-point plan to resolve the Syrian conflict. The plan calls for an immediate end to violence and negotiations between all parties to form a transitional government, but does not call for Assad to step down.

McCain in J’lem: Boost US effort to oust Assad

January 20, 2013

McCain in J’lem: Boost US effort to oust A… JPost – Middle East.

01/19/2013 21:14
US senator, bipartisan delegation meet President Peres, discuss Syria, Iranian threat, US-Israel strategic ties.

US Senator John McCain

US Senator John McCain Photo: Kevin Lamarque / Reuters

“All of us believe that Bashar Assad’s departure is inevitable, but we don’t know how long it will take. Some of us would like to see the United States more engaged in that effort,” Sen. John McCain said in Jerusalem on Saturday night.

McCain, who was the Republican presidential nominee in the 2008 US election, is leading a bipartisan delegation on a tour of the region. They met with President Shimon Peres at his official residence after having visited Egypt, Afghanistan and Jordan.

McCain said that the delegation had visited a Syrian refugee camp in Jordan on Saturday morning and had seen thousands and thousands of people who had fled the brutal Assad regime. Some of the refugees were seriously injured.

In welcoming the delegation, Peres said that the visit was a declaration to the rest of the region that America remains engaged in the great march for freedom, democracy and peace.

There are currently two critical issues in the region, said Peres. One is Iran and the other is Syria. Israel appreciates the American position on Iran, namely not to allow it to become a nuclear power, he said.

The situation in Syria, he said, “is causing us a great deal of sorrow.”

Peres has been pained by television images of the wholesale slaughter of Syrian children and has mentioned this on several occasions when speaking to foreign dignitaries.

He also referred to elections which have taken place in various countries in the Middle East, and said that while they served to put problems on the table, they did not furnish solutions.

“You came at a demanding and meaningful time,” he told McCain.

Both Peres and McCain spoke of Israel as an island of democracy.

Accompanying McCain were: Sen. Kelly Ayotte (RNew Hampshire), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (DConnecticut), Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island), Sen. Chris Coons (D-Delaware), Christian Brose, a senior adviser on the Senate Armed Services Committee, and US Ambassador Dan Shapiro.

McCain was in the forefront of the successful effort to block the nomination of Susan Rice, the US ambassador to the United Nations, to succeed Hillary Clinton as secretary of state.

At the meeting with Peres, the delegation discussed the latest developments related to the Iranian threat, major challenges confronting Israel today, specifically with regard to neighboring countries, and the strengthening of bilateral strategic ties between Israel and the US.

Netanyahu hits back at Obama: I won’t capitulate

January 20, 2013

Netanyahu hits back at Obama: I won’t capitulate | The Times of Israel.

It would be easy to retreat to indefensible pre-67 lines and divide Jerusalem, prime minister says, ‘but we’d get Hamas 400 meters from my house’

January 19, 2013, 8:34 pm 26
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gestures as he speaks to Russian immigrants during an election campaign stop in the port city of Ashdod, Wednesday (Photo credit: Tsafrir Abayov/Flash90)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gestures as he speaks to Russian immigrants during an election campaign stop in the port city of Ashdod, Wednesday (Photo credit: Tsafrir Abayov/Flash90)

Days after President Barack Obama was quoted as castigating Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for ostensibly turning Israel into a pariah nation and threatening its long-term survival, Netanyahu hit back Saturday night, declaring that if he were to capitulate to demands for a retreat to the pre-1967 lines, “we’d get Hamas 400 meters from my house.”

According to a report Tuesday by Bloomberg columnist Jeffrey Goldberg, Obama has begun repeating the mantra that Israel under Netanyahu “doesn’t know what its own best interests are.”

Israelis can and will decide for themselves who best represents their interests, Netanyahu retorted in a Channel 2 interview. Alluding to Obama’s calls for an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement based on the pre-1967 lines with land swaps, and a halt to building over the pre-67 lines in Jerusalem, Netanyahu said, “When they say, ‘Go back to the ’67 lines,’ I stand against. When they say, ‘Don’t build in Jerusalem,’ I stand against.”

He added: “It’s very easy to capitulate. I could go back to the impossible to defend ’67 lines, and divide Jerusalem, and we’d get Hamas 400 meters from my home.” That would not happen under his leadership, he said.

“It’s easy to do, and they’d applaud,” he went on, presumably referring to the US-led international community. “They’d applaud just like they applauded the parties (in the 2005 Israeli government) that pulled out of Gaza. Those parties got applause, and we got a rain of rockets.”

Netanyahu said that no matter what pressures were applied, “I have to stand up for our vital interests… when speaking in Congress, and at the UN.”

In a newspaper interview on Friday, Netanyahu also pledged not to dismantle any settlements in the next four years if he is reelected prime minister on Tuesday, as polls suggest he will be.

Netanyahu did praise Obama for backing Israel during November’s Operation Pillar of Defense against terror groups in Gaza, and for joining the effort to thwart Iran’s nuclear drive. His job as prime minister, he told Channel 2, was “to seek cooperation and to stand up for our interests.”

In the TV interview, the prime minister refused to discuss the possible partners in his next coalition, if he is reelected. Speaking at a cultural event series in Beersheba, his No. 2, Yisrael Beytenu head Avigdor Liberman, said he wouldn’t rule out any party from joining the Likud-Beytenu coalition. “Anyone who accepts our coalition guidelines can join us,” Liberman said.

Netanyahu dismissed as “nonsense,” a claim by right-wing rival Naftali Bennett that he was seeking to harm and delegitimize Orthodox Israelis. Bennett accused Netanyahu of signing off on an “ugly campaign” against the modern Orthodox. A Likud party statement later described Bennett’s criticisms as “hysterical.”

The key focus of Obama’s reported criticism was Netanyahu’s settlement construction policies, which recently included plans for thousands of homes in the West Bank and East Jerusalem in response to the Palestinian Authority’s successful gambit to gain nonmember observer state status from the UN in November.

According to Goldberg, the White House has stopped getting in a huff over the settlement moves, wearily regarding the settlement building as Netanyahu’s harmful modus operandi.

“[Obama] told several people that this sort of behavior on Netanyahu’s part is what he has come to expect, and he suggested that he has become inured to what he sees as self-defeating policies of his Israeli counterpart,” Goldberg wrote.

“With each new settlement announcement, in Obama’s view, Netanyahu is moving his country down a path toward near-total isolation,” Goldberg added. “And if Israel, a small state in an inhospitable region, becomes more of a pariah — one that alienates even the affections of the U.S., its last steadfast friend — it won’t survive. Iran poses a short-term threat to Israel’s survival; Israel’s own behavior poses a long-term one.”

Goldberg added that, as regards Netanyahu’s handling of the Palestinians, “the president seems to view the prime minister as a political coward, an essentially unchallenged leader who nevertheless is unwilling to lead or spend political capital to advance the cause of compromise.”

Goldberg said John Kerry, Obama’s nominee for secretary of state, wants to try to restart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, but Obama “is thought to be considerably more wary. He views the government of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas as weak, but he has become convinced that Netanyahu is so captive to the settler lobby, and so uninterested in making anything more than the slightest conciliatory gesture toward Palestinian moderates, that an investment of presidential interest in the peace process wouldn’t be a wise use of his time.”

Yet the president believes — and has believed since his time in the Senate — according to Goldberg, that if Israel “doesn’t disentangle itself from the lives of West Bank Palestinians, the world will one day decide it is behaving as an apartheid state.”

In Goldberg’s assessment, “the short-term consequences of Obama’s frustration are limited. The US won’t cut off its aid to Israel, and Obama’s effort to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions will continue whether or not he’s fed up with Netanyahu. But it is in terms of American diplomatic protection — among the Europeans and especially at the UN — that Israel may one day soon notice a significant shift. During November’s vote on Palestine’s status, the U.S. supported Israel and asked its allies to do the same” — without much success. “When such an issue arises again, Israel may find itself even lonelier. It wouldn’t surprise me if the U.S. failed to whip votes the next time, or if the U.S. actually abstained. I wouldn’t be particularly surprised, either, if Obama eventually offered a public vision of what a state of Palestine should look like, and affirmed that it should have its capital in East Jerusalem.”

Goldberg wrote that the president recognizes that “broad territorial compromise by Israel” in the current unstable Middle East is unlikely. “But what Obama wants is recognition by Netanyahu that Israel’s settlement policies are foreclosing on the possibility of a two-state solution, and he wants Netanyahu to acknowledge that a two-state solution represents the best chance of preserving the country as a Jewish-majority democracy. Obama wants, in other words, for Netanyahu to act in Israel’s best interests. So far, though, there has been no sign that the Israeli government is gaining a better understanding of the world in which it lives.”

PM: History will not forgive those who permit nuclear Iran

January 20, 2013

PM: History will not forgive thos… JPost – Diplomacy & Politics.

 

By JPOST.COM STAFF

 

01/20/2013 10:20
In a meeting with US senators in Jerusalem, Netanyahu says building in the Jewish state’s capital is not the world’s problem, but the Iranian nuclear program is; senators, PM discuss intensifying sanctions against Iran.

PM and Senator McCain in J'lem, January 2013

PM and Senator McCain in J’lem, January 2013 Photo: GPO

 

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on Saturday night said history will not forgive those who do not stop the Iranian nuclear program.

In a meeting with American senators including former Republican presidential nominee John McCain, the prime minister said: “History will not forgive those who do not stop Iran’s nuclear program.”

“Building in Jerusalem is not the world’s problem; a nuclear Iran is the world’s problem,” added Netanyahu.

The senators discussed changes in the Middle East, including the need to intensify sanctions against Iran, which continues to advance its nuclear program, according to the Prime Minister’s Office. The prime minister also addressed the issue of advancing contacts between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas.

Netanyahu thanked the senators for the relentless support of the Senate for the State of Israel.

Accompanying McCain were: Sen. Kelly Ayotte (RNew Hampshire), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (DConnecticut), Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island), Sen. Chris Coons (D-Delaware), Christian Brose, a senior adviser on the Senate Armed Services Committee, and US Ambassador Dan Shapiro