Archive for January 5, 2013

Hagel may become US defense secretary next week

January 5, 2013

Hagel may become US defense secretary next week | The Times of Israel.

Fight this !

( I implore all my American readers to contact their Senators and ask them to oppose this catastrophic nomination. – JW )

Former Republican senator said to have an ‘endemic hostility towards Israel’ is the front-runner for the top Pentagon post

January 5, 2013, 5:00 am 3
Then-Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama and Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., tour the citadel in Amman, Jordan, in July 2008. (photo credit: AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

Then-Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama and Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., tour the citadel in Amman, Jordan, in July 2008. (photo credit: AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

WASHINGTON — US President Barack Obama may round out his new national security leadership team next week, with a nomination for defense secretary expected and a pick to lead the CIA possible.

Former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, said by a top House Democrat in a recent Newsmakers interview to have an “endemic hostility towards Israel,” is the front-runner for the top Pentagon post. Acting CIA Director Michael Morell and Obama counterterrorism adviser John Brennan are leading contenders to head the spy agency.

The public fight over the possible nomination of former senator Hagel as secretary of defense is quickly crystallizing into a battle over the “Israel lobby” and its ostensible influence on the US national agenda.

Pundits and several former officials who support Hagel have responded to criticism of the potential nominee by railing against “the brutal AIPAC-led campaign” against him — AIPAC has not expressed an opinion on the possible nomination — and suggested the battle against Hagel is being led by a “small minority of zealots” driven by their hardline views on Israel.

White House aides said the president has not made a final decision on either post and won’t until he returns from Hawaii, where he is vacationing with his family. Obama is due back in Washington Sunday morning.

Obama nominated Sen. John Kerry to replace Hillary Rodham Clinton as secretary of state in December, his first step in filling out his second term Cabinet and national security team. Kerry, as well as the nominees for the Pentagon and CIA, must be confirmed by the Senate.

Hagel, the former senator from Nebraska, is a contrarian Republican moderate and decorated Vietnam combat veteran who is likely to support a more rapid withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan. If confirmed, Hagel would give Obama a whiff of bipartisanship in his Cabinet.

Even before his nomination, Hagel’s consideration for the top Pentagon job raised concerns among some of his former Senate colleagues, who questioned his pronouncements on Iraq, Israel and the Middle East. Troubling for some lawmakers are Hagel’s comments and actions on Israel, including his reference to the “Jewish lobby” in the United States.

Hagel has also been criticized for comments he made in 1998 about an openly gay nominee for an ambassadorship. In an interview with the Omaha World-Herald in 1998, Hagel said he believed that for a US ambassador, “it is an inhibiting factor to be gay” and referred to James C. Hormel as “openly, aggressively gay.” He has since apologized for those comments.

If nominated and confirmed, Hagel would replace current Defense Secretary Leon Panetta.

Morell has served as the CIA’s acting director since early November, after David Petraeus resigned after admitting to an affair with his biographer.

Brennan, Obama’s top counterterrorism adviser, worked at the CIA for 25 years, including a stint as station chief in Saudi Arabia. He also served as chief of staff to then CIA Director George Tenent from 1999 to 2001, when he was named the agency’s deputy executive director.

Israel AWOL in Iran nuke plant attack

January 5, 2013

Israel AWOL in Iran nuke plant attack.

Analysts say lack of action linked to concerns over isolation

Published: 10 hours ago

Editor’s Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95 per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the complete reports.

WASHINGTON – Despite many threats, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu still hasn’t decided whether to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, raising questions among analysts, reports Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.

Regional analysts say that Israel’s lack of action has less to do with military capability than concern about isolating itself, especially from the United States. In the long run, Israel knows that Washington’s interest in the region will wane as the U.S. becomes more energy independent.

For the U.S., an Iran with a nuclear weapon, if it decides to take that path, would be less of a threat than it would be to Israel.

“The United States faces little or no direct risk from a few, low-grade Iranian nukes,” according to a report by the open intelligence group Stratfor. “The threat to the United States is indirect: A nuclear Iran threatens U.S. allies, including Israel – and, thus, threatens America’s reputation for power in the Middle East and the world.

“This is a substantial risk, but not one of the same magnitude that Israel faces,” the report said. “It is from this differentiation of risk that the tension arises between Washington and Jerusalem.

“Washington can only attack Iran if it faces literally no other choice,” it said. “Of course, Jerusalem would describe its own policy likewise, but Jerusalem’s red line is closer and more acute than Washington’s.”

Analysts say that given the potential for isolation from the U.S., the long term isn’t looking good for Israel, with the uncertainty among Middle East countries and the increasing rise of Sunni militancy sweeping the region.

The concern aboutU.S. interest in the Middle East also will be a major factor in long-term outlook.

Analysts also say that one thing aggravating the U.S.-Israeli relationship is the issue over settlement construction in the West Bank and in East Jerusalem. The concern is that Israel is taking land that was to be incorporated in a separate Palestinian state.

Netanyahu has declared that the land in question will remain part of Israel in any peace deal with the Palestinians.

The Israeli prime minister has called on the Palestinians to resume bilateral talks. However, the Palestinians say there is nothing to talk about as long as settlements are being constructed on land that would be part of a new Palestinian state.

“Beginning in a decade or so, the United States will have relatively little need of energy from the Persian Gulf, reducing measurably its geopolitical interest in the region,” the Stratfor report said. “This will make Israel even lonelier.”

Unless there is a dramatic change in Iran politically in the near future, Israel then will have to continue contending with a nuclear state.

“Israel’s strategic peril may, in fact, have no solution,” Stratfor said. “And that means it will have to manage its partnership with Washington even more adroitly.”

Keep in touch with the most important breaking news stories about critical developments around the globe with Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence news source edited and published by the founder of WND.

For the complete report and full immediate access to Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, subscribe now.