Archive for November 13, 2012

Obama’s election and Gaza

November 13, 2012

Israel Hayom | Obama’s election and Gaza.

It sure didn’t take long for the effect of the U.S. election to be felt around the world, particularly in the Middle East. Within days of President Barack Obama’s victory, Israel found itself under missile and mortar attack on two fronts.

Though the bulk of the blitz is coming from the Gaza Strip in the south, stray shells from Syria in the north have also presented a serious problem, one that has resulted in retaliatory fire on the part of the Israel Defense Forces. Whether Israel is merely being hit inadvertently by rebels battling against the Assad regime, or by Syrian army moves against them, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made it clear that he cannot tolerate the reckless endangerment of his citizenry in the Golan Heights.

His greater worry, however, involves deciding how to handle the massive daily barrages on innocent men, women, and children in cities, towns, and villages all over the southern part of the country, as far north as Ashdod, a mere 40 minutes away from Ben-Gurion International Airport.

This situation is not new to Netanyahu or his predecessors. In fact, Qassams and Grads, funded by Iran and transferred to Hamas and other terrorist groups via tunnels between Egypt and Gaza, have been launched into Israel for the past 12 years. After the disengagement from the Gaza Strip in 2005, when the Likud government evacuated every last Jew from the territory, the severity of these attacks increased exponentially.

The tragic irony here is that the purpose of the withdrawal was to keep suicide bombers from Gaza out of Israel’s population centers, where they had been entering daily and blowing themselves up in crowded buses, shopping malls, and restaurants. So, ultimately, one unbearable kind of carnage was replaced by another.

Four years ago, just after Obama was elected the first time, Israel went to war against the rocket-happy terrorists in Gaza and their infrastructure. Operation Cast Lead, as that incursion was called, ended badly. This is because Israel withdrew its troops for the wrong reason: not after getting the job done (or even rescuing then-captive soldier Gilad Schalit), but rather to prepare for its own Knesset elections. As a result, just as was the case with Hezbollah in the aftermath of the 2006 Second Lebanon War, Hamas simply regrouped, rebuilt its arsenal, rearmed its soldiers, and, of course, refilled its Tehran-sourced till.

Obama was inaugurated in January 2009, about a month before Netanyahu became prime minister. The first leader the American president phoned from the Oval Office was Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. This was only the beginning of Obama’s literal and figurative announcement to members of the Arab-Muslim world that his main goal was to conduct “outreach” and “dialogue” with them, no matter how radical or anti-American — including the mullahs pulling the strings in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Indeed, as soon as he and his family were settled comfortably in their new digs in the White House, Obama took a trip to Cairo, where he delivered a speech to this very effect, titled “A New Beginning.” Understanding the significance of such sentiments from the president of the United States — sprinkled with Arabic, no less — the predominately Muslim Brotherhood audience was buoyed.

And well might they have been. A year and a half later, with the encouragement of the Obama administration, they took over Egypt, following the ousting of long-time American ally President Hosni Mubarak.

Nor was the Brotherhood the only group to take note of Obama’s dim view of American power and even dimmer view of Israeli sovereignty. Every radical Islamist organization has been emboldened by what it sees as weakness emanating from Washington. Even Iran, whose saber-rattling rhetoric has been as anti-Obama as it was anti-Bush, grasped that it would have an easier time stepping up its nuclear weapons program with such wimps for enemies. Witnessing Obama reprimanding Netanyahu for daring to suggest that he draw “red lines” which, once crossed by Tehran, would constitute a casus belli, was a relief to the Iranian regime. This meant that Israel would have no choice but to “go it alone,” if at all — unless Mitt Romney were to become president, in which case, things might not be so simple.

When Obama won a second term last week, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his puppet, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, understood two key things: that the game of summits and negotiations was back on the table, and that the best distraction from their own dastardly plan would be to push Israel into an untenable position with America.

What could be better than goading Netanyahu into a war, just as an election campaign is heating up in the Jewish state?

Netanyahu knows this, too, which is why he convened all the country’s ambassadors on Monday to appeal to their logic and elicit their sympathy. It is behind his having pointed out to them that their own governments would not be able to sit by and be bombed morning, noon, and night without their taking some kind of action.

Good luck to him, is all I can say. When British Ambassador Matthew Gould emerged from the meeting with a statement to reporters that sounded almost identical to that released by the European Union — that “both sides” should exercise restraint, so as not to “escalate” matters — it was evident that Netanyahu had wasted his breath.

Meanwhile, his political future is on the line. The public that is being bombarded by missiles is begging him to go to war. Others are urging caution. Then there are those who fear that he will launch an operation, but pull out before the election — repeating the fiasco of 2008-9.

How he responds remains to be seen.

But there is no question mark punctuating the peril of the West with Obama at its helm for the next four years, if the last seven days since his re-election are any indication.

Ruthie Blum is the author of “To Hell in a Handbasket: Carter, Obama, and the ‘Arab Spring,’” available on Amazon and in bookstores in Europe and North America — and now on sale at Pomeranz Bookseller in Jerusalem.

‘This is far from over,’ Barak says amid talk of impending ground operation in Gaza

November 13, 2012

‘This is far from over,’ Barak says amid talk of impending ground operation in Gaza | The Times of Israel.

Terrorists fire rocket at Ashdod as south enters fourth straight day of violence; Egypt reportedly threatens to recall ambassador if Israel invades Strip

November 13, 2012, 3:05 am Updated: November 13, 2012, 10:42 am 2
Defense Minister Ehud Barak supervises a Patriot missile exercise at the Palmachim Air Force base, November 12, 2012 (photo credit: Defense Ministry/Flash90)

Defense Minister Ehud Barak supervises a Patriot missile exercise at the Palmachim Air Force base, November 12, 2012 (photo credit: Defense Ministry/Flash90)

With talk mounting of a possible Israeli ground operation against terror factions in Gaza, Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Tuesday met with OC Southern Command Maj.-Gen. Tal Russo in the headquarters of the IDF’s Gaza Division, and vowed to respond forcefully to rocket attacks from the Strip.

“Over the past few days, Hamas has sustained severe blows,” Barak said. “As far as we’re concerned, this is far from over.”

The defense minister stopped short of explicitly mentioning a ground operation, but asserted that the Israel would decide “when and by what means to restore our deterrence. Hamas is responsible for what’s been going on, and it won’t emerge unscathed from recent events.”

Cross-border violence continued Tuesday morning, for the fourth straight day, as Palestinians fired a rocket at southern Israel and Israel Air Force jets struck rocket launching sites and a weapons warehouse in the Strip. The rocket slammed into an open area outside the coastal city of Ashdod, but did not cause casualties or damage.

As of Tuesday morning, over 160 rockets and mortar shells had hit Israel since Saturday. More than 40 Israelis were reported lightly injured, mostly suffering from shock and light shrapnel injuries. Palestinian sources on Tuesday morning said a terrorist had died of wounds sustained in an IAF airstrike on Sunday, bringing the number of dead in Gaza to seven. Palestinians say four of those killed since Saturday were civilians.

A volley of Grad rockets was fired at towns in the south just after nightfall on Monday, with a number landing near Beersheba, Netivot and Ofakim. Two rockets were shot down by the Iron Dome anti-missile system near Ofakim. Three rockets landed in open areas near Sderot before 10 p.m. No injuries or damage were reported in those attacks.

Earlier in the day, 26 people were treated for shock after a direct hit on a home in Netivot. A second missile hit a factory in the city’s industrial zone in the afternoon.

On Tuesday morning, ahead of a meeting of senior ministers set to deliberate the recent escalation, Education Minister Gideon Sa’ar hinted that a more comprehensive Israeli response to the rocket attacks was in the offing.

“Anyone with eyes in his head” can see that a ground operation in the Gaza Strip was near at hand, Sa’ar said. In an interview with Israel Radio, the minister, a member of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s security cabinet, reiterated that increasingly frequent bouts of cross-border violence in recent months were creating an untenable situation.

An Israeli holds the remnants of a rocket, fired by Palestinian terrorists, in the southern town of Netivot, Monday, November 12, 2012 (photo credit: Tsafrir Abayov/Flash90)

An Israeli holds the remnants of a rocket, fired by Palestinian terrorists, in the southern town of Netivot, Monday, November 12, 2012 (photo credit: Tsafrir Abayov/Flash90)

“The cabinet will choose the timing responsibly and level-headedly,” Sa’ar said, noting that any cease-fire agreement with Gaza would be fragile due to the whims of a multiplicity of factions that did not feel obligated to comply with Hamas’s instructions.

“We can’t remain dependent on each and every terror cell, and we have to make the other side realize that there are painful repercussions to the firing of rockets at Israel,” he said.

MK Nahman Shai, who is vying for a spot on the Labor Party’s Knesset list for the upcoming elections, called for a diplomatic solution, including, “perhaps in the future, direct talks with Hamas.”

Maariv reported that Egypt had threatened to recall its new ambassador in Tel Aviv, Atef Salem, if Israel embarked on a ground operation in Gaza.

Knesset speaker Reuven Rivlin announced that the Knesset, which is currently in recess, would convene on Thursday for a special session to deliberate recent developments along the border with Gaza.

On Monday, Netanyahu started taking steps to shore up international support for a possible military ground operation into Gaza that would aim to quell the ongoing rocket fire from the strip.

“The world must understand that Israel has the right and obligation to defend its citizens,” he told some 50 ambassadors in Ashkelon. “We will not sit idly in front of recurrent attacks that occur almost daily, against our citizens and our children. More than one million citizens have to live in a reality where within 15 or 30 seconds they need to find shelter against terrorists who shoot at civilians, while the terrorists themselves hide behind civilians. That’s a double war crime.

“None of your governments would accept such a situation,” he said. “We do not accept such a situation, and I, as prime minister of Israel, am not prepared to accept this situation, and we will act to stop it.”

Barak and IDF Chief of General Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz met with Netanyahu Monday night to present him with their assessment of a possible military escalation against the Gaza Strip.

President Shimon Peres told CNN that Israel was not seeking an escalation of hostilities, but would do whatever was necessary to protect its citizens.

“No country in the world would agree to it — without exception,” Peres said. “[The Israeli government] shall try to stop it by all the means we can mobilize and use… we don’t think that we’re defenseless.”

He added that the international community should cut off funding to Hamas as long as it remained belligerent.

The rocket fire began on Saturday night, touched off by an Israeli airstrike that followed an attack on an Israeli jeep patrolling near the border that left four soldiers injured.

Barak travels to Gaza border, says hostilities not over

November 13, 2012

Barak travels to Gaza border, says hostilities… JPost – Defense.

LAST UPDATED: 11/13/2012 11:07
Defense minister meets with IDF OC Southern Command and Gaza Division Commander, says IDF intends “to bring back deterrence” to border; PM meets with security cabinet to discuss possible response to rockets.

Ehud Barak at Gaza security evaluation. Photo: IDF Spokesman

Defense Minister Ehud Barak traveled to the Gaza border on Tuesday where he visited the IDF’s Gaza Division and held a security evaluation with army chiefs.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was meeting with the security cabinet on Tuesday morning to discuss possible responses to threats from Gaza, after the IAF hit three targets in the Strip overnight Monday. One of the responses being considered is targeted assassination of Hamas commanders in Gaza, Army Radio reported.After meeting with OC Southern Command, Maj.-Gen. Tal Russo, and Gaza Division Commander, Brig.-Gen. Micky Edelsteinm, Barak said the ongoing conflict with Gazan terror organizations “is still not over.”

He praised the army officials for “a professional and systematic operation that is being carried out,” adding that “Hamas and the terror organizations are absorbing heavy blows in Gaza as a result.”

“This clearly isn’t over and we will decide how and when to act the minute there will be a need to do so,” the defense minister said, repeating similar statements he made over the past three days.

“I don’t want to address when or ways [to operate], because it would not be right to give that information to the other side,” he said.

Barak reiterated that Israel “would not accept the harm to daily life of our civilians,” adding that “we intend to bring back deterrence” and to ensure that the IDF will be able to operate freely along the Gaza border fence, where it has come under frequent attack in recent weeks.

Asked to respond to the frustration of southern residents over the lack of a clear IDF response to the recent Palestinian rocket barrages, Barak said, “I’d like to praise the heads of councils and mayors… and civilians… on their resilience.” He added that there was no speedy solution.

“On these issues it’s preferable to act rather than to speak,” Barak added.

Yishai to UN: Stop Gaza terror before Israel must act

Interior Minister Eli Yishai on Tuesday called on the UN and the international community to take immediate action to stop rocket fire from the Gaza, before Israel was forced to respond to the attacks to protect its citizens.

In a letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Yishai said, “Before Israel determines the timing and strength of its response, I request your immediate intervention to deter and stop the terrorist activity of the decision-makers in Gaza.”

Hamas leaders in Gaza called a meeting of the various factions on Monday evening to examine how to avoid further Palestinian casualties, Bethlehem-based Ma’an news agency reported, citing a Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) leader. Six Palestinians have been killed in Israeli strikes since the weekend, four of whom were civilians.

A Hamas statement from the meeting said that its activities and the possibility of a cease-fire “depend on the continuation of the Israeli aggression.”

Soon after the meeting, however, Gazans fired three additional rockets at Sderot.The rockets exploded in open areas, causing no damages or injuries.

Tuesday morning, Palestinians fired a long-range rocket at Ashdod. The projectile exploded in the vicinity of the city, failing to cause injuries.

Tovah Lazaroff and JPost.com staff contributed to this report.

Barak: Current round of violence not over – Israel News, Ynetnews

November 13, 2012

Barak: Current round of violence not over – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak held a situation assessment together with Southern Command chief Tal Russo at the Gaza Division on Tuesday. “Over the past few days Hamas has been getting tough blows. This is not over as far as we’re concerned,” he said.

Barak further added, “We will decide when and how to retaliate. We will not tolerate the targeting of civilians. Hamas is responsible of what is going on and will not escape unpunished.” (Matan Tzuri)

Gaza terrorists fire rocket at Ashdod as south enters fourth straight day of violence

November 13, 2012

Gaza terrorists fire rocket at Ashdod as south enters fourth straight day of violence | The Times of Israel.

No casualties or damage reported; air force strikes targets in the Gaza Strip; amid talk of ground operation, top Israeli ministers set to meet Tuesday morning

November 13, 2012, 3:05 am Updated: November 13, 2012, 7:29 am 0
An Israeli holds the remnants of a rocket, fired by Palestinian terrorists, in the southern town of Netivot, Monday, November 12, 2012 (photo credit: Tsafrir Abayov/Flash90)

An Israeli holds the remnants of a rocket, fired by Palestinian terrorists, in the southern town of Netivot, Monday, November 12, 2012 (photo credit: Tsafrir Abayov/Flash90)

With talk mounting of a possible Israeli ground operation against terror factions in Gaza, cross-border violence continued Monday night and Tuesday morning, as Palestinians fired a rocket at southern Israel and Israel Air Force jets struck rocket launching sites and a weapons warehouse in the Strip.

The rocket slammed into an open area outside the coastal city of Ashdod, and did not cause casualties or damage.

The IAF airstrikes late Monday night came after rocket fire from Gaza continued to pummel Israel’s south for the third straight day. As of Tuesday morning, over 160 rockets and mortar shells had hit Israel since Saturday. More than 40 Israelis were reported lightly injured, mostly suffering from shock and light shrapnel injuries.

A volley of Grad rockets were fired at towns in the south just after nightfall on Monday, with a number landing near Beersheba, Netivot and Ofakim. Two rockets were shot down by the Iron Dome anti-missile system near Ofakim. Three rockets landed in open areas near Sderot before 10 p.m. No injuries or damage were reported in those attacks.

Earlier in the day, 26 people were treated for shock after a direct hit on a home in Netivot. A second missile hit a factory in the city’s industrial zone in the afternoon.

On Tuesday morning, ahead of a meeting of senior ministers set to deliberate the recent escalation, Education Minister Gideon Sa’ar hinted that an extensive Israeli response to the rocket attacks was in the offing.

“Anyone with eyes in his head” can see that an Israeli ground operation in the Gaza Strip was near at hand, Sa’ar said. In an interview with Israel Radio, the minister, a member of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s security cabinet, reiterated that the increasingly frequent bouts of cross-border violence were creating an untenable situation.

“The cabinet will choose the timing responsibly and level-headedly,” Sa’ar said, noting that any cease-fire agreement with Gaza would be fragile due to the whims of a multiplicity of factions that did not feel obligated to comply with Hamas’s instructions.

“We can’t remain dependent on each and every terror cell, and we have to make the other side realize that there are painful repercussions to the firing of rockets at Israel,” he said.

Speaking after Sa’ar, MK Nahman Shai, who’s vying for a spot on the Labor Party’s Knesset list for the upcoming elections, called for a diplomatic solution, including, “perhaps in the future, direct talks with Hamas.”

Maariv reported that Egypt had threatened to recall it’s new ambassador in Tel Aviv, Atef Salem, if Israel embarked on a ground operation in Gaza.

On Monday, Netanyahu started taking steps to shore up international support for a possible military ground operation into Gaza that would aim to quell the ongoing rocket fire from the strip.

“The world must understand that Israel has the right and obligation to defend its citizens,” he told some 50 ambassadors in Ashkelon. “We will not sit idly in front of recurrent attacks that occur almost daily, against our citizens and our children. More than one million citizens have to live in a reality where within 15 or 30 seconds they need to find shelter against terrorists who shoot at civilians, while the terrorists themselves hide behind civilians. That’s a double war crime.

“None of your governments would accept such a situation,” he said. We do not accept such a situation, and I, as prime minister of Israel, am not prepared to accept this situation, and we will act to stop it.”

Defense Minister Ehud Barak and IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz met with Netanyahu Monday night to present him with their assessment of a possible military escalation against the Gaza Strip.

President Shimon Peres told CNN that Israel was not seeking an escalation of hostilities, but would do whatever was necessary to protect its citizens.

“No country in the world would agree to it — without exception,” Peres said. “[The Israeli government] shall try to stop it by all the means we can mobilize and use… we don’t think that we’re defenseless.”

He added that the international community should cut off funding to Hamas as long as they remained belligerent.

The rocket fire began on Saturday night, touched off by an Israeli airstrike that followed an attack on an Israeli jeep patrolling near the border that left four soldiers injured.

A government official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, neither denied nor confirmed reports that Israel was planning a ground invasion into Gaza. “Different options are being looked at,” he told The Times of Israel. “It’s more than possible that there will be a need to reassert Israeli deterrence,” the official said.

“Netanyahu wants to make sure that the international community will understand the reasons if Israel is forced to act,” the official said ahead of the prime minister’s meeting with the senior diplomats.

The Rockets of Gaza – Jeffrey Goldberg – The Atlantic

November 13, 2012

The Rockets of Gaza – Jeffrey Goldberg – The Atlantic.

Rockets are flying from Gaza into Israel at a fast clip, and Israelis, it is said, are divided on the question of how to respond. I’m not there right now (I’m elsewhere in this exciting region) so I’m not current on Israeli government thinking about this issue, though Amir Mizroch just reported on Twitter that Avi Dichter, Israel’s internal security minister, said  today that there is “no precedent in history destroying terror by airpower alone. Thus it is necessary to re-format Gaza altogether.”

Re-format? I’m not sure what word was actually used in Hebrew, but in English this doesn’t sound very encouraging. By re-format, does Dichter mean that the Israeli army should invade Gaza, overthrow Hamas, and take direct control of the Strip? Is that what re-formating means? And does that seem like a good idea? Or something actually achievable, without a horrendous cost?

There is no military solution to the Gaza conflict, at least not one that Israel could pursue. Gaza isn’t Chechnya and Netanyahu isn’t Putin. Flattening Gaza is not a moral solution, nor a practical solution. Nor, for that matter, is it a politically possible solution. Netanyahu is calling in Western diplomats to explain to them that Israel has no choice but to respond militarily to the rocket fire. What he doesn’t seem to understand is that he doesn’t possess the political capital to ask the West for its understanding. There’s plenty of blame to go around for the collapse of the peace process; his portion is substantial, and his alienation of leaders who might otherwise be friends is a continuing theme of his tenure.

Israel has a right to defend itself, and life is an absolute misery for Israelis in rocket range. But before Israel invades, it might want to pause and ask itself if there is any other way possible to reach a ceasefire. Israel can certainly succeed in killing terrorists, but I fear an invasion will only set back Israel’s cause further, and diminish its standing, leading to a situation in which the world would condemn any and all attempts by Israel to defend itself. Why not work, for at least a few days, to convince the world to pay attention to Hamas’s crimes? Why let Hamas define the narrative?

Between violence on Gaza border and Syria tensions, Israel mulls next move

November 13, 2012

Between violence on Gaza border and Syria tensions, Israel mulls next move – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

It seems Netanyahu would rather avoid a significant operation in the Strip, which is why the logical course of action for him would be to increase aerial strikes.

 

By and | Nov.13, 2012 | 12:18 AM | 6

 

Mortar shell marks seen on a wall

 

Israel is preparing for a series of offensive measures against Hamas and the other Palestinian militant groups in the Gaza Strip, amid continued fire from the coastal enclave into the Negev. Among other options, Israeli officials are considering such moves as targeting prominent militants as well as a systematic attack on Gaza’s infrastructures and Hamas institutions in the Strip. Meanwhile, tensions persist in the Golan Heights as well, where Israeli tanks fired at Syria forces – apparently hitting two soldiers – in response to a Syrian mortar shell landing in Israeli territory.

In the late afternoon and evening hours Monday, Israeli military and government officials held a series of consultations geared at determining the requited mode of action against Hamas. Security sources refused to indicate which decisions were made, though hinting that Israel has yet to exhaust its response and that significant military action can be expected in the near future.

It seems that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would rather avoid a major land operation in the Strip, which is why the logical course of action for him would be to increase aerial strikes, which have been relatively mild until now. On Monday, Israel Air Force crafts attacked three targets in Gaza, including an arms warehouse and a smuggling tunnel. A wide assault could include hitting top Hamas officials as well as their assets.

Alongside deliberations in Israel as to the correct course of action, weather conditions have added more limitations: recent rainfall and the cloudy skies that have been covering Gaza have made it harder to execute effective aerial operations.

More than twenty rockets and mortar shells were fired from the Strip into Israel on Monday, a significant drop compared to the previous two days of fighting along the border with the costal enclave. The attacks caused damage to a house and factory in the town of Netivot, with several residents treated for anxiety. Israeli officials estimated that members of the Salafi group Majlis Shura Al-Mujahideen were behind launches, and that Hamas would find it difficult to enforce his authority.

It seems that, for Israel, the moment of truth is drawing closer. Speaking to foreign envoys in Ashkelon, Netanyahu said that the “world has to understand that Israel has the right and the duty to defend its citizens,” adding: “We will not sit idly by. We will act to stop this situation.”

The purpose of an Israeli action would be to restore quiet to the Gaza border for some time, as well as to regain military deterrence, which gradually eroded since Operation Cast Lead four years ago. One of the problems facing Netanyahu is that Israeli officials find it hard to estimate to what degree the message is being received on the other end. After months of Israeli rhetoric, without any real action, Hamas could suspect that Netanyahu is issuing empty threats.

From Hamas’ standpoint, the recent limited conflict proved beneficial, with elections for the head of the group’s politburo taking place in recent days. Hamas’ Prime Minister Ismayil Haniyeh can use some fighting spirit, as he vies for the position against Moussa Abu Marzouk, Hamas’ Cairo-based official.

But in the lack of any control over the extremist factions, Hamas is finding it hard to control the height of the flames, at least not for very long. For political reasons, Hamas has recently avoided clashing both Salafists and Jihadists, since it doesn’t wish to be portrayed as another Palestinian Authority. Thus, it allows the Salafists some leeway in their actions against Israel, and avoided a reaction after they founded training camps in the Strip. Hamas continues to look the other way while dozens of global Jihad militants enter Gaza from Sinai, despite the tensions this causes with Egypt.

It’s possible that, for Hamas, this would be the time to end current clashes. Firstly, because it scored certain achievements (hitting the IDF patrol vehicle on Saturday) without paying a heavy price, and, secondly, fearing that Israel could mean business anyway. If Israel chose to respond severely for the recent days’ events, Hamas has a “doomsday weapon” of his own – the Iranian Fajr rockets smuggled into the Strip, boasting a range of 75 kilometers. When launched from the northern Strip, they can hit most of central Israel.

Standing at the background of the current exchange of fire was a tactical issue – the agreed rules of engagement in what the IDF calls the “special security zone” or “perimeter.” It is an unmarked strip of land west of the border fence, a few meters wide, into which Israel is trying to prevent Palestinian activities and even sometimes operate IDF forces.

The goal is to push attack squads away from striking IDF forces moving along the fence surrounding the Strip, while dismantling explosive devices positioned by Palestinian groups on Gaza’s side of the fence. A considerable part of Palestinian attacks in recent weeks were aimed at the “perimeter,” but have also recently spilled over to the Israeli side of the border.

Four soldiers from the Givati infantry brigade were wounded following the anti-tank fire on the IDF vehicle, which was driving more than 100 meters into Israeli territory. This tactical battle has been taking place, on and off, from before Operation Cast Lead. Now, it seems, that Hamas is feeling secure enough to challenge Israeli policy and try and enforce new rules on the IDF.

On the northern front

While Israel tries to figure out what message it is trying to convey to Hamas, it has been having trouble communicating its intent in another front – the North. Much media attention was given to the launch of the “Tamuz” missile into an open field in Syria on Sunday, fired in response to the errand Syrian mortar shell exploding on the Israeli side, as Syrian troops continue their attacks on rebel strongholds on the Syrian side of the border, but still hit the Israeli side now and again.

It seems, however, that the message wasn’t received. A Syrian shell again struck Israeli territory earlier Monday, exploding near an IDF outpost in Tel Azekah. Again, the fire seems to have been aimed at rebels near the village of Beer Ajam. In response, an Israeli tank fired an accurate shell at a Syrian artillery batter. According to unofficial reports, two soldiers from Syrian President Bashar Assad’s army were hit.

Officially, Syria is ignoring the Israeli shootings, with Syrian media failing to report these latest incidents. Even Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah ignored the exchange in a speech he gave on Monday evening. It’s doubtful that Assad is interested in escalating matters with Israel, with the hardship he faces at home. And still, at least thus far, he seems unimpressed by the IDF’s signals.

One should probably add the joint missile test Israel and the United States conducted on Monday to the long list of regional developments. As part of the drill the two armies have been conducting for several weeks, Patriot missile batteries intercepted a drone. Indirectly, there was a message for Iran and Hezbollah too, after Hezbollah sent Iranian-made drone into Israeli airspace over a month ago.

Salafists keep up missile fire after most Palestinian Gaza groups buy a truce

November 13, 2012

Salafists keep up missile fire after most Palestinian Gaza groups buy a truce.

DEBKAfile Special Report November 12, 2012, 10:41 PM (GMT+02:00)

A rocket smashes through the ceiling of a Sderot home

Most  Palestinians organizations led by Hamas convened in Gaza City Monday night, Nov. 12, to approve the cessation of their three-day rocket offensive against Israel brokered by Egypt. The meeting was shunned by the Salafists, who instead signaled their repudiation of a truce by firing 5 heavy Grad rockets against the Israeli towns of Netivot, Beersheba and Ofakim.
debkafile’s counter-terror sources report that the Salafist extremists, some affiliated with al Qaeda, were behind most of the missile attacks during Monday, topping up the 300 assorted rockets fired against the southern Israeli population from Saturday.

Yet Israel, Egypt and even Hamas continued to delude themselves that an effective ceasefire was feasible.
So while, the IDF refrained from striking the rocket teams during the day in expectation of a ceasefire  – and instead scattered leaflets reminding Gazans to stay 300 meters back from the Israeli border fence – the Salafists were busier than ever taking delivery of a fresh load of Grad rockets through the smuggling tunnels from Sinai to sustain their continuous barrage against Israel.
The eastgernmost point of those tunnels, the inersection of the Israeli, Egyptian and the Gaza Strip borders,  is just out of reach of the Israeli army. For a strike to effectively stop the flow of smuggled hardware, Israel would have to hit the key section which runs through Egyptian territory.
Hamas can’t reach those tunnels either, because the Salafist groups which control the southern section of the Gaza Strip bar their access.
But the Jihad Islam is a different matter. This Iranian proxy does play ball with the Salafists and in fact shares with them some of its own Grad supplies. The Jihad thus plays both sides against the middle – cooperating with Hamas and Egypt to enforce a ceasefire, on the one hand, and helping the Salafists scupper it, with the other.

Gaza’s Palestinian terrorist organizations, including the ruling Hamas, have never upheld any truce for long, only reducing rocket fire to a trickle for long enough to stall a major Israeli attack, and reviving it full blast after a few weeks, The difference this time is that Jihad Islami holds the key to the truce. If Tehran, Damascus and Hizballah wanted a ceasefire to hold up, they would order Jihad to withhold its assistance from the Salafists. But this has not happened.
The view in the high IDF command, which handed its recommendations to the defense minister and prime minister Monday, is that even if the Salafists play along with the Egyptian truce bid for a couple of days to keep the Israeli military off their backs, when things quiet down, they will go back to shooting rockets.
Their purpose is to keep Israel on the hop and its Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on the horns of a dilemma.

Israel-US drill simulates Syrian-Iranian attack, with Patriot missiles test-launched from central Israel

November 13, 2012

Israel-US drill simulates Syrian-Iranian attack, with Patriot missiles test-launched from central Israel | The Times of Israel.

Exercise grapples with long-range missile dangers; defense minister hails Iron Dome’s success in intercepting Gaza rockets since Saturday

November 12, 2012, 1:58 pm 0
Defense Minister Ehud Barak (left in black) supervises the launching of a Patriot missile during air defense exercises on November 12, 2012 (photo credit: Defense Ministry/Flash90)

Defense Minister Ehud Barak (left in black) supervises the launching of a Patriot missile during air defense exercises on November 12, 2012 (photo credit: Defense Ministry/Flash90)

Israel conducted an air defense drill on Monday, simulating a possible attack on the country by Syrian and Iranian long-range missiles.

The exercise, overseen by Defense Minister Ehud Barak and performed in conjunction with the United States, saw the successful test launch of four Patriot missiles from central Israel into the Mediterranean sea.

About 2,500 American troops, and an equal number of IDF personnel, took part in the drill.

“It is, first of all, an expression of the deep cooperation between our two countries,” Barak said of the launch. The defense minister explained that the exercise was designed to test older systems of missile defense and ensure that they work in conjunction with “the most modern,” the Iron Dome.

“Iron Dome is repeatedly intercepting missiles aimed at our communities,” Barak added, speaking about the dramatic escalation of rocket attacks from Gaza since Saturday, in which the Iron Dome system has been deployed to intercept a series of missiles heading for population centers in Beersheba, Ashkelon and other southern areas.

“These are very important days, both for advancing our collaboration [with the US] on missile defense, and for our ongoing response to Hamas and the terror organizations in Gaza — which may intensify and expand.”

Nasrallah touts lack of IDF response to drone as sign of Hezbollah’s might

November 13, 2012

Nasrallah touts lack of IDF response to drone as sign of Hezbollah’s might | The Times of Israel.

Lebanese Shiite leader says new reality deterring ‘Zionists’; blasts Arab League for silence on Gaza

November 12, 2012, 11:33 pm 3
Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah speaking in July via video feed (image capture from Al Manar News video)

Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah speaking in July via video feed

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah said Monday that Israel’s lack of response to the drone that entered its airspace in October was a sign of the Shiite militia’s newfound strength in the face of its enemy to the south.

Speaking via videolink to supporters in Beirut on Martyrs Day, Nasrallah called the unmanned aerial vehicle, which he said gathered intelligence, a “progressive measure and part of our new deterrence policy against the enemy.”

“Israel did not do anything” after the October 6 UAV incident “because today there is a different reality in Lebanon,” Nasrallah said.

“The name of the game is only deterrence. Now the Zionist enemy cannot come and continue to bomb and destroy.”

Nasrallah also criticized the Arab League and Islamic states for not standing up to Israel while, he said, Gaza is attacked daily and dozens are killed and wounded. He called the latest round of fighting between Israel and the Gaza Strip a test for the Arab League.

Regarding the explosion at a munitions factory outside the Sudanese capital of Khartoum last month, Nasrallah charged that Israel “bombed a member of the Arab League. The world is already used to defending Israel and not saying a thing.”

Nasrallah denounced objections by members of the Lebanese opposition to Hezbollah’s sending of the drone, which they called a needless provocation. “The March 14 Coalition began issuing laments and statements of mourning, saying the incident would give Israel an excuse to strike Lebanon,” Nasrallah said.

The Lebanese Daily Star quoted Nasrallah as saying that members of the opposition group “were egging on the Jewish state to attack Lebanon” and hoped Israel would attack.

The Shiite leader devoted much of his speech to disparaging members of the country’s progressive March 14 political alliance as collaborators with the Israelis who “never believed in the resistance” and “never considered the Zionist entity an enemy.”

He charged that Christian members of the opposition group are “complicit with foreign forces” and were trying to ignite internecine violence in Lebanon, particularly between Shiite and Sunni Muslims.

Nasrallah dismissed charges that Hezbollah was behind the October 19 car bomb in Beirut that killed police intelligence chief Wissam al-Hassan and instead blamed Israel. He said that the opposition “pointed a finger at Syria without any evidence” and that “some people accused Hezbollah and claimed that the killers of the top Sunni officer are Shiite.

“If they were reasonable, they would have mentioned all possibilities, but the absurd thing is that they excluded Israel from the very beginning and accused Hezbollah,” he noted.