Archive for October 25, 2012

Why an Israeli Attack in Sudan Wouldn’t Be Practice for Iran – ABC News

October 25, 2012

Why an Israeli Attack in Sudan Wouldn’t Be Practice for Iran – ABC News.

Two big questions have emerged in the aftermath of a mysterious explosion at a weapons factory in Sudan: Was the factory the target of an Israeli air strike? And, if so, could the attack be seen as a demonstration of the same capabilities Israel may one day use to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities?

As to the first question, Israel has been blamed by top Sudanese and Iranian officials of carrying out Tuesday night’s bombing of the Yarmouk factory just south of the Sudanese capital of Khartoum. They say witnesses claim they saw four Israeli planes come in from the east. For their part, Israeli military officials have done little today to squelch the rumors.

The second question emerges when one compares the distances from Israel to the Sudanese facility and the distance from Israel to potential Iranian nuclear targets. Top Israeli officials and America’s President Obama have said that no option is off the table, including the use of military force, to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, should it become clear that’s the goal of their nuclear program.

From the southern tip of Israel to Khartoum is just under 1,000 miles – almost exactly the distance from Israel to Tehran, Iran.

So if Israel was behind the Sudan strike, did such a long-distance attack prove Israel could unilaterally pull similar move on Iran? Hardly.

First, unlike Iran, Sudan has little air defense capability to speak of and its own fighters do not fly at night. A night time strike on a relatively undefended target is not a difficult operation for any first tier military power.

Second, if the explosion in Sudan was the work of the Israelis, the operation apparently only required four planes to hit a single target. Should Israel launch a strike against Iran’s nuclear program, it would likely require hitting several sites around the same time by dozens of Israeli aircraft – each of which would be a potential target for Iran’s alert air defenses and indigenous air force.

And if Israel took anything but a route over the Red Sea to Iran, they would have to fly over several countries with far more sophisticated air defense capabilities. The element of surprise would be much harder to maintain.

Iran would be a truly Varsity operation, as opposed to this alleged Sudan strike, which might be considered JV at best.

Col. Steve Ganyard (Ret.) is a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Plans, Programs and Operations in the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, a former Marine Corps fighter pilot, and is now an ABC News consultant.

Sudan-Iran links under scrutiny after explosion | Kuwait Times

October 25, 2012

Sudan-Iran links under scrutiny after explosion | Kuwait Times.

KHARTOUM: Sudan’s links to Iran came under scrutiny yesterday after Khartoum accused Israel of a deadly missile strike on a military factory in the heart of the Sudanese capital.

The cabinet met in urgent session late Wednesday after the government said evidence pointed to Israeli involvement in the alleged attack at around midnight Tuesday on the Yarmouk military manufacturing facility in southern Khartoum. Sudan accused the Jewish state of a similar raid 18 months ago. Analysts, however, said they had not ruled out an accidental cause for the latest blast. Israeli officials have expressed concern about arms smuggling through Sudan and have long accused Khartoum of serving as a base of support for militants from the Islamist Hamas movement.

Israel refused all comment on the Khartoum allegations, but Amos Gilad, a top Israeli defense official, called Sudan “a dangerous terrorist state.” Gilad, director of policy and political-military affairs at the defense ministry, refused to reply directly when asked whether Israel was involved in the attack, which Sudan said was conducted by four radar-evading aircraft. “The regime is supported by Iran and it serves as a route for the transfer, via Egyptian territory, of Iranian weapons to Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists,” he told his country’s army radio yesterday. “Sudanese President Omar Al-Bashir is regarded a war criminal.”

Bashir is wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide in Sudan’s Darfur region where a rebellion began in 2003. His cabinet issued no statement after its late Wednesday meeting, where Bashir joined anti-Israel protesters in chanting “Allahu akbar” (“God is greater”).  About 300 demonstrators denounced the United States and carried banners calling for Israel to be wiped off the earth. “There was supposed to be an agreement between Sudan and Iran to produce some kind of non-conventional weapons,” a diplomatic source said yesterday.

The source, asking not to be identified, said he was also told that the Yarmouk factory was involved in drone production. But Jonah Leff, of Small Arms Survey, a Swiss-based independent research project, said he doubts such equipment is made locally. Leff’s project has documented the presence of a drone, landmines and other Iranian weapons in Sudan but he thinks they were acquired directly from Iran. “There’s a lot of speculation that Iran has provided technical assistance to the Sudanese for their weapons manufacturing but I haven’t been able to confirm that they’re producing any Iranian weapons,” he said. On a visit to Tehran last August, Bashir described the relationship between Sudan and Iran as “deeply rooted”.

Leff identified Yarmouk as part of Sudan’s Military Industry Corporation, which claims to produce a variety of weapons from pistols to battle tanks. “They’re highly secretive… It’s hard to know what exactly they’re producing and what is propaganda,” Leff said. Information Minister Ahmed Bilal Osman told reporters on Wednesday that the factory made “traditional weapons”. Nearby residents said an aircraft or missile had flown overhead shortly before the area exploded in flames, sending bursts of white light into the night sky. Sudan called on the UN Security Council to condemn Israel for what its envoy, Daffa-Alla Elhag Ali Osman, called “a blatant violation of the concept of peace and security” and the UN charter.

On Wednesday, before officials accused Israel, the governor of Khartoum state Abdul Rahman Al-Khider dismissed speculation that “other reasons” caused the explosion, which he said happened in a store room. The diplomatic source said “the human factor”—a possible accidental cause—should not be ruled out although Sudanese officials are taking allegations of Israeli involvement seriously. Leff said it is just as likely that the Sudanese are blaming Israel to avoid embarrassment after an accidental blast. In April last year, Sudan said it had irrefutable evidence that Israeli attack helicopters carried out a strike on a car south of Port Sudan. That incident mirrored a similar attack by foreign aircraft on a truck convoy reportedly laden with weapons in eastern Sudan in January 2009.- AFP

PM Netanyahu: Israel has nothing to say about Sudan attack

October 25, 2012

By JPOST.COM STAFF

LAST UPDATED: 10/25/2012 16:30

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on Thursday stated Israel has nothing to say about Wednesday’s explosion at an arms factory in Khartoum which the Sudanese government attributed to an Israeli air strike.

Netanyahu’s comments followed those by Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who by when asked by Israel’s Channel Two News about Sudan’s accusations said: “There is nothing I can say about this subject.”

Sudan called on the UN Security Council to condemn Israel for the attack which killed two people.

via Jerusalem Post – Breaking News.

For What it’s Worth 10-25-2012.

October 25, 2012

For What it’s Worth 10-25-2012.mp4 – YouTube.

Victory in Khartoum !

Diplomats: Iran one step closer to nuclear bomb

October 25, 2012

Diplomats: Iran one step closer … JPost – Iranian Threat – News.

By REUTERS
10/25/2012 15:27
Western diplomats say Iran finished installing last 640 uranium centrifuges planned at Fordow underground plant, but has not started running them; Tehran rejects weapon allegations, says work is for fuel.

Ahmadinejad visits of the Natanz Uranium Enrichmen

Photo: Associated Press
VIENNA – Iran appears to have nearly finished installing centrifuges at its underground nuclear plant, Western diplomats say, potentially boosting its capacity to make weapons-grade uranium if it chose to do so.

Iran only disclosed the existence of the Fordow plant, built inside a mountain to shield it from air strikes, in 2009 after learning that Western spy services had detected it.

The United States and its allies are particularly worried about Fordow because Iran is refining uranium there to a fissile concentration of 20 percent, which Iran says it needs for a medical reactor.

The diplomats said they had heard of indications that Iran had put in place the last 640 or so uranium centrifuges of a planned total of some 2,800 at the site, but had not started running them yet.

“I understand that they have installed all the centrifuges there,” one envoy said.

Another diplomat said he also believed that the centrifuges had been placed in position, but that piping and other preparations needed to operate them may not yet be completed.

Twenty percent purity is only a short technical step from weapons grade, and the work goes to the heart of Western fears that a program that Iran says is purely peaceful is in fact a cover for the development of a nuclear weapons capability.

Any move by Iran to increase output at Fordow would further alarm the United States and Israel, which have reserved the option to use military force to prevent Iran getting the bomb, and complicate on-off diplomatic efforts to resolve the dispute.

There was no immediate comment from Iran or the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN watchdog based in Vienna, which is expected to issue its next report on Tehran’s nuclear program in mid-November.

Fears of war

Diplomacy and successive rounds of economic sanctions have so far failed to end the decade-old row, raising fears of Israeli military action against its arch enemy and a new Middle East war damaging to a fragile world economy.

Iran already has enough low-enriched uranium for several nuclear bombs if it were refined to a high degree, but may still be a few years away from being able to assemble a missile if it decided to go down that path, analysts say.

The IAEA said in its last report in August that Iran had doubled the number of centrifuges at Fordow to 2,140 in about three months.

But diplomats said the number of machines that were in operation, nearly 700, had not changed since early this year.

“The last I heard was that they (the newly installed centrifuges) were not operational,” one of the diplomats said.

It was not clear whether Iran was holding back for technical or political reasons. It is also not known whether the centrifuges that are not yet operating will be used for 5- or 20-percent enrichment, or both.

Iran may be able to accumulate up to four ‘significant quantities’ of weapons-grade uranium – each sufficient for one bomb – in as little as nine months from now, nuclear experts Olli Heinonen of Harvard University’s Belfer Center and Simon Henderson of the Washington Institute said in a paper.

“This timetable will shrink as more 20 percent enriched uranium is produced, at which point potential breakout time will be measured in weeks rather than months,” they said.

Nuclear experts say any country seeking to become a nuclear-armed power would probably only break out once it could produce at least several bombs.

From Gaza to Khartoum

October 25, 2012

Israel Hayom | From Gaza to Khartoum.

Yoav Limor

Israel was busy on the southern front on Wednesday, both in the Gaza Strip and also, according to foreign reports, in Sudan.

The escalation in Gaza stemmed from the damage that Hamas has suffered recently. There have been 20 deaths in Gaza in the past two weeks and eight within the past 48 hours, including five Hamas members. For the sake of comparison, only one Hamas operative was killed in Gaza in the year leading up to this round of escalation, and his death was accidental. Hamas let loose, but still made sure to not break the rules of the game. It did not fire any long-range rockets and focused on “legitimate” warfare near the border fence. Its reason for this was to avoid causing civilian casualties in Israel that would give the Israeli government an excuse to broaden the fighting.

The relatively determined response of the Israel Defense Forces, along with Israel’s explicit threat to cause more harm, led to Hamas believing it had had enough in this round. Senior Hamas officials cried out to Cairo and asked the Egyptians to mediate an unofficial cease-fire. Israel, as usual, responded positively and demanded that the cease-fire apply to all terrorist organizations operating in Gaza. On Wednesday night, it appeared that Hamas was indeed acting to impose a cease-fire on all terrorist factions in Gaza. It therefore seems that the current round of fighting has come to an end. Two other reasons for reaching a cease-fire were the rainy conditions that are predicted for the coming weekend and the desire of Hamas to honor the sanctity of the Eid Al-Adha holiday that starts Thursday evening.

On a more distant front, in Sudan, there are more question marks than answers. There is no doubt that an attack took place, but who attacked exactly what and with which means? Past experience teaches us that reports like those received yesterday tend to be correct for the most part, meaning that an attack certainly occurred. Sudan is a large arms depot and also a transit point for Iranian weapons being shipped to destinations in the Middle East (Lebanon and Gaza). The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is active in Sudan, including running weapons manufacturing factories. Was one of these factories the target in this case? Possibly, but it could also be that the official report coming from Sudan was meant to hide something that Sudan is trying to keep secret.

The question of who launched the attack is also still not completely clear. Foreign reports have tied Israel to many past operations in Sudan, including the sinking of ships, the bombing of convoys and the assassinations of terrorist operatives, making it natural for the finger to also be pointed at Israel this time. The IDF has the capabilities and means to conduct such a strike, irrespective of whether the attack was in fact carried out by fighter jets or not. Israel, as is its custom, was silent about the reports from Sudan, and it also will not respond to threats of revenge emanating from Khartoum, to retain full ambiguity. One can assume that if Israel was indeed responsible for the attack, the target was important enough to justify the difficulties and risks involved in such a long-distance operation.

Although there was seemingly no connection between the fighting in Gaza and the attack in Sudan, there is a clear common denominator for Israel in the two arenas — to prevent terrorism and create deterrence. How much deterrence was created? Past experience does not tell us much. The gap between rounds of escalation, as well as between weapons smuggling attempts, is shrinking. And with the exposed nerves and political tension here in Israel, along with the piles of gunpowder over there on the other side of the border, it can be assumed that fighting in the south will resume again soon.

‘US Sudan embassy closed shortly after munitions factory explosion’

October 25, 2012

‘US Sudan embassy closed shortly after munitions factory explosion’ | The Times of Israel.

Hundreds chant ‘death to Israel’ in Khartoum; Sudanese minister says his country has the right to respond

October 25, 2012, 2:58 pm 1
Central Khartoum (photo credit: CC BY, NZ Defence Force, Flickr)

Central Khartoum (photo credit: CC BY, NZ Defence Force, Flickr)

The US embassy to Sudan was reportedly closed on Wednesday, shortly after an explosion at a weapons facility south of the capital Khartoum.

Al-Hayat reported on Thursday that the embassy, which stopped providing services in September after being attacked by rioters protesting the anti-Islamic film “Innocence of Muslims,” was completely closed following the alleged bombing, which was blamed by the Sudanese government on Israel.

The article quoted Sudanese sources, who said that the US knew Israel was behind the attack and closed its embassy, fearing retaliation for the alleged bombing.

On Wednesday night, hundreds of people gathered in the Sudanese capital holding anti-Israel signs after Khartoum said Jerusalem had been behind the attack, which killed two people.

Some 300 demonstrators rallying against Israel chanted slogans, including “Death to Israel” and “Remove Israel from the map,” according to a report in the Iranian Press TV.

Minister of Information Ahmed Belal Osman told reporters on Wednesday that four aircraft hit the Yarmouk Complex, setting off a huge blast that rocked the capital before dawn.

“Four planes coming from the east bombed the Yarmouk industrial complex,” Belal said. “They used sophisticated technology.” He didn’t elaborate further.

Belal also referred to a 2009 attack on an arms convoy that killed dozens in the Red Sea province in the east of the country. The government then blamed the attack on Israel, which believes Sudan is a conduit for arms shipments through Egypt to Gaza’s militant Hamas rulers. Israel does not comment officially on the issue.

Belal said the complex produces conventional weapons. He said his country has the right to respond.

In a letter to the UN Security Council, Sudan’s representative called the attack a “blatant violation” of the UN charter and called for condemnation from the world body.

Belal also said a technical team is inspecting remains of the missiles used in the attack which he said suggest Israel is behind the bombing. He didn’t provide any evidence.

Israeli officials neither confirmed or denied Israel’s involvement.

At the same news conference, military spokesman Sawarmy Khaled said two people were killed and another was seriously injured in the blast. Earlier, officials said some people suffered from smoke inhalation.

In New York, Sudan’s UN Ambassador Daffa-Alla Elhag Ali Osman called on the UN Security Council to condemn the attack, accusing Israel of meddling in its internal affairs and providing support to rebel groups.

The Cairo-based Arab League said it is closely following the fallout from the attack. Deputy Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed bin Helli said Sudanese officials are in touch with the League and have provided initial reports about Israel’s alleged involvement. “We are working to verify them,” he said.

Sudanese activists on social media websites criticized the government for placing a factory with such large quantities of ammunition in a residential area.

Sudan has been engaged in various armed conflicts for many years.

Sudan’s government has been at war with rebels in the western region of Darfur and with its neighbors in South Sudan, which broke away to become Africa’s newest country in 2011. Sudan’s president, Omar al-Bashir, has been indicted by the International Criminal Court on charges of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Sudan was a major hub for al-Qaeda militants and remains a transit for weapon smugglers and African migrant traffickers.

The US imposed economic, trade and financial sanctions against Sudan in 1997, citing the Sudanese government’s support for terrorism, including its sheltering of al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden in Khartoum the mid-1990s.

In 1998, American cruise missiles bombed a Khartoum pharmaceutical factory suspected of links to al-Qaeda. That followed the terror group’s bombings of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed 224 people.

The Yarmouk weapons complex was built in the 1996. Sudan prided itself in having a way to produce its own ammunition and weapons despite international sanctions.

Yarmouk is one of two known state-owned weapons manufacturing facilities in the Sudanese capital.

Jonah Leff of the Geneva-based Small Arms Survey told The Associated Press that the location of the two factories is “certainly a hazard” to Khartoum’s population if the weapons inside are not properly maintained or secured.

A September report from the Small Arms Survey said there was evidence from weapons packaging found in Darfur and in South Kordofan that arms and ammunition from China are exported to Yarmouk and then transported to the two embattled regions.

Leff said that although the Small Arms Survey has documented Sudanese military stocks of Iranian weapons and ammunition, there is no evidence that Iranian weapons are being assembled or manufactured in the two Khartoum factories.

Sudan opposition: Bombed arms factory belongs to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard

October 25, 2012

Sudan opposition: Bombed arms factory belongs to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

It is still unclear who is responsible for the attack on the Yarmouk military plant in south Khartoum, but according to past reports in the foreign media, Iran has built such facilities in order to arm Hamas.

By | Oct.24, 2012 | 9:22 PM | 7
An image of ammunition remains - AFP - October 24, 2012.

An image of ammunition remains at a press conference following an overnight explosion at the Yarmouk military plant in Khartoum, October 24, 2012. Photo by AFP

Opposition sources in Sudan claim that the arms factory bombed overnight Tuesday in south Khartoum, the Sudanese capital, belongs to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard.

At this point, it is difficult to verify these claims since it isn’t even clear who stands behind the bombing. Sudan’s Information Minister Ahmed Belal Osman claimed that four Israeli planes are responsible for the bombing of the Yarmouk Military Industrial Complex in southern Khartoum. “They came from the east,” he said. “You know that last year, and the year before that, Sudanese citizens were attacked in the Red Sea… it all point to Israel’s involvement.”

However, what was not said by the Sudanese authorities, who provided a plethora of confusing and conflicting reports (even regarding the number of casualties), was information regarding the factory itself. In recent years, several reports published in the Arab media said that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard built weapons manufacturing plants together with the Sudanese government.

However, their military cooperation does not end with the establishment of one military plant, and even senior Sudanese officials have not denied in the past that Iran has military factories on their land.

In fact, according to foreign reports, the arms factories that Iran built in Sudan were meant to arm Hamas. In the past, European media reported that Iran has sent men from the Republican Guard in order to train the Sudanese army.

Moreover, after the fall of the regime of Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi, the Al-Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps succeeded in smuggling dozens of antiaircraft and SA-24 missiles from the Libyan army’s crumbling arsenals to Sudan, in order to later pass them on to Hamas.

One of the reports said that these missiles are held in a military facility in north Darfur which is controlled by the Revolutionary Guard.

The bombing of the military factory in Khartoum took place after midnight on Tuesday. Initially, senior officials in Sudan claimed that the explosion was the result of an accident that occurred during routine maintenance. However, residents in the area told the Sudan Tribune, which is located outside of Sudan, that they heard a sound similar to that of a missile, and then several seconds later they heard a big explosion. It was also reported that at least two people were killed in the blast and eyewitnesses reported seeing a big crater in the facility.

Sudan reporter: Local communications severed prior to arms factory blast

October 25, 2012

Sudan reporter: Local communications severed prior to arms factory blast – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper.

Blackout meant that aside from the sound of gunshots, residents of the area had no idea what was going on, journalist tells Haaretz.

By | Oct.25, 2012 | 1:55 PM
Sudan explosion

Fire engulfs Yarmouk ammunition factory in Khartoum October 24, 2012. Photo by Reuters

The telecommunications networks in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum were disconnected for about an hour before an explosion rocked an arms factory there a local journalist told Haaretz on Thursday.

The blackout meant that aside from the sound of gunshots, residents of the area had no idea what was going on, said the journalist. The explosion lit up the sky, and nobody knew at first what was going, he added. Eyewitnesses later described hearing planes flying in the sky around the time of the blast.

Residents of the area know that the factory is used for producing and storing weapons, said the journalist. Large parts of the factory were destroyed in the blast, he said.

Four military planes attacked the Yarmouk arms factory overnight between Tuesday and Wednesday, causing a mass fire. After many hours of silence, Sudan’s information minister accused Israel of being behind the explosion.

Sudan, which analysts say is used as an arms smuggling route to the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip via neighboring Egypt, has blamed Israel for such strikes in the past but Israel has always either refused to comment or said it neither admitted nor denied involvement.

Four military planes attacked the Yarmouk plant … We believe that Israel is behind it,” Information Minister Ahmed Belal Osman told reporters, adding that “the planes had appeared to approach the site from the east.”

“Sudan reserves the right to strike back at Israel,” he said, saying two citizens had been killed and that the plant had been partially destroyed.

“We are now certain that this flagrant attack was authorized by the same state of Israel. The main purpose is to frustrate our military capabilities and stop any development there and ultimately weaken our national sovereignty,” Osman said.

He said his country has the right to respond and may take the issue to the UN Security Council.

Obama’s Red Carpet for Islamic Radicals | David M. Weinberg

October 25, 2012

Obama’s Red Carpet for Islamic Radicals | David M. Weinberg.

By: David M. Weinberg

Oct 25, 2012

The centrifuges continue to spin in Qom and the Obama White House doors continue to revolve – with Islamic radicals and apologists coming and going. It’s no wonder that many Israelis hope for a different president, soon.

A year-long investigation published on Sunday by Steve Emerson’s Investigative Project on Terrorism has found that scores of known radical Islamists made hundreds of visits to the Obama White House, meeting with top administration officials. Many of these visitors as belonging to groups serving as fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and other Islamic militant organizations.

This says a lot about the Administration’s outlook on Mideast affairs. This should be big story. Amazingly, it has not become so.

I don’t blame the Romney campaign for not seizing on the revelations, because the campaign is understandably tacking toward the center and focusing on economic issues in these final days of the presidential campaign. Nor did I really expect the Obama-biased liberal American press to make a story of this. But for the life of me I can’t understand why American Jewish groups and Jewish-Israeli media haven’t picked up on this explosive story. Is everybody covering for Obama?

Consider: Among the American Arab visitors to the Obama White House have been officials representing groups which have been designated by the Department of Justice as unindicted co-conspirators in terrorist trials; people who have extolled Islamic terrorist groups including Hamas and Hizballah; people that have obstructed terrorist investigations by instructing their followers not to cooperate with law enforcement; people that regularly sermonize about the “US war against Islam”; and people who claim that the US government is framing Islamic terrorists as part of an anti-Muslim profiling campaign.

Individuals from the Council on American-Islamic Relations have visited the White House at least 20 times since Obama took office. Louay Safi, formerly executive director of the Islamic Society of North America, a front for the Muslim Brotherhood and for Hamas, visited the White House twice. Esam Omeish, former head of the Muslim Brotherhood-created Muslim American Society, visited the White House three times. The Muslim Public Affairs Council has secured the closest working relationship with the Obama White House, despite, according to Emerson, that organization’s record of anti-Semitism, whitewashing the terrorist threat and hostility toward law enforcement.

These revelations, which the White House hasn’t even bothered to counter or respond to, suggest once again that Obama has more than a soft spot for Moslem Brotherhood types. That he still hasn’t dropped his declared goal of a grand US-Islamic world rapprochement – despite the continued rebuffing of his “outreach to the Moslem world” by Ahmadinejad, Morsi and others. And that in a second term, Obama might cut a “grand bargain” with the Iranians on the nuclear issue, at Israel’s expense.

The story this week by the unabashedly pro-Obama New York Times about a secret US-Iran agreement to start direct talks on the nuclear issue – ramps up the suspicion level. After all, Iran has clandestinely crossed every virtual “red line” set by Obama over the past four years – putting nuclear plants online, building heavy water facilities, refining uranium, working on explosive triggers and warheads, and generally breaching all its obligations under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty – and has gotten away with it, without ever really angering Obama.

Despite all Obama’s protestations to the contrary, Israeli officials are concerned that Obama might quietly acquiesce to the Iran’s current nuclear status in exchange for understandings with Tehran on the division of power in the region.

A “grand bargain” with Iran could involve tacit recognition of their hegemony in the Gulf region and an agreement to press Israel to forgo its nuclear arsenal in exchange for Iranian promises not to enrich uranium beyond 20 percent. Aside from crippling Israel, this would leave Iran’s nuclear development facilities intact, including the Fordow underground center, instead of dismantling them, and allow the Iranians to quietly continue refining their nuclear skills.

In a little noticed move, the Administration has recently indicated its support for a UN conference scheduled for Finland in early 2013 on a nuclear-free Middle East – which would likely concentrate pressure on Israel. This directly contradicts Obama Administration guarantees to Israel that were given just last summer.

The most recent report of the International Atomic Energy Agency underlined the fears being expressed in Israel about Iran moving inevitably into a zone of “immunity” beyond which attacks on their nuclear facilities might be futile. It stated that Iran had doubled the number of its centrifuges enriching the uranium needed for a bomb and is now housing them in a secure underground bunker. Obama’s team has issued no response to the IAEA report, except to breathe relief when Netanyahu hinted at the UN that Israel’s “deadline” for destroying Iran’s nuclear factories has been bumped forward to next summer.

All the while, the centrifuges continue to spin in Qom and the White House doors continue to revolve – with Islamic radicals and apologists coming and going. It’s no wonder that many Israelis hope for a different president, soon.