Archive for October 14, 2012

Air Force Strikes Gaza for Fourth Time, 2 Killed

October 14, 2012

Air Force Strikes Gaza for Fourth Time, 2 Killed – Defense/Security – News – Israel National News.

Terror rocket squad targeted in fourth IAF air strike in 24 hours. Two killed, 2 wounded.

By Gil Ronen

First Publish: 10/14/2012, 5:58 PM

 

Israeli father views rocket damage, Netivot

Israeli father views rocket damage, Netivot
Israel news photo: Flash 90

The Israel Air Force struck targets in the terrorist haven of Gaza for the fourth time in 24 hours Sunday afternoon. The IAF said the target was a terror squad that had fired a rocket at Israel a short time earlier, and was about to do so again.

Sources in Gaza reported that two people had been killed and two others wounded in this latest IAF attack.

Arab witnesses said the latest Israeli strike targeted a motorcycle near Deir al-Balah in central Gaza, killing two terrorists in their early 20s.

Ashraf al-Qudra, spokesman for the Hamas-run health ministry, told AFP the strike killed Ezzedine Abu Nasira, 23, and Ahmad Fatayer, 22, and left two more people in critical condition.

An Israeli army spokeswoman said they were targeted after firing a rocket into Israel that struck in the Eshkol regional authority flanking the southern sector of the Gaza border, without causing injury.

IAF strikes Saturday killed a leader of a Salafist group, Hisham a-Saedini, as well as another Salafist terrorist.

All together, five people have been killed in IAF strikes on Gaza in the past 24 hours.

Hisham al-Saedini was one of the founders of the Mujahideen Shura Council, said the IDF, noting that this organization is affiliated with Global Jihad and was involved in extensive terrorist activity against Israeli civilians and IDF soldiers over the years.

Iran may induce ‘environmental disaster’ in Strait of Hormuz, Der Spiegel reports

October 14, 2012

Iran may induce ‘environmental disaster’ in Strait of Hormuz, Der Spiegel reports | The Times of Israel.

Secret plan — dubbed ‘Murky Waters’ — would reportedly force West to participate in cleanup, ease sanctions

October 14, 2012, 5:03 pm 6
The guided-missile cruiser USS Cape St. George (CG 71) and the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) transit the Strait of Hormuz (photo credit: CC BY Official U.S. Navy Imagery)

The guided-missile cruiser USS Cape St. George (CG 71) and the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) transit the Strait of Hormuz (photo credit: CC BY Official U.S. Navy Imagery)

Iran is considering the option of artificially producing an enormous environmental disaster that would affect the entire region, in order to punish its enemies and force the West to decrease the sanctions against the regime, Der Spiegel reported on Sunday.

According to Western intelligence agencies quoted by the the German news weekly, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have developed a secret plan to intentionally cause an oil tanker to contaminate the strategically important Strait of Hormuz.

Dubbed “Murky Waters,” the plan is reportedly the brainchild of Revolutionary Guard head Mohammad Ali Jafari and Iranian Navy commander Admiral Ali Fadawi. The purpose of the environmental disaster would be to block the Strait of Hormuz to international oil tankers, and to “punish” states in the area that are hostile to Iran, according to the report. Furthermore, Western nations, forced to cooperate with Iran in efforts to clean the strait, would conceivably be forced to reduce the sanctions currently placed on the Islamic Republic.

The plan is currently in the hands of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who would be the one deciding about its implementation, the magazine said.

Satellite view of the Strait of Hormuz (photo credit: NASA/Public domain)

Satellite view of the Strait of Hormuz (photo credit: NASA/Public domain)

On Saturday, Khamenei vowed to defy the efforts of the West and Israel to thwart the regime’s nuclear ambitions. “We should not neglect the enemy,” he said at a public lecture. “One day it’s talk of sanctions. Another day it’s talk of military aggression. And one day, it’s talk of soft war… But they should rest assured that… our enemies will fail in all their conspiracies and tricks.”

One-fifth of the world’s oil transports pass through the Strait of Hormuz, which is why the US has said it would not tolerate the closure of the strait, something Iran has threatened in the past. In July, Adm. Ali Reza Tangsiri, a senior Iranian navy commander, said Tehran had no plans to close the strait.

An electromagnetic pulse attack — the ‘other’ Iranian nuclear threat

October 14, 2012

An electromagnetic pulse attack — the ‘other’ Iranian nuclear threat | The Times of Israel.

Some experts say Tehran may be preparing for an EMP strike — which could ‘fry’ electrical grids, with devastating consequences

 

October 14, 2012, 7:31 pm 0

 

At risk? Israel's electric grid (photo credit: Roni Schutzer/Flash 90)

At risk? Israel’s electric grid (photo credit: Roni Schutzer/Flash 90)

 

 

Just what might happen if the Iranians got their hands on a nuclear weapon? Would they fire it at an Israeli city, causing tens or hundreds of thousands of casualties? Or would they use it as a geopolitical weapon, seeking to dominate the Middle East and forcing the hand of Western powers, either subtly or by overtly threatening death and destruction to those who fail to heed their dictates?

 

While political scientists and world leaders have debated the likelihood of those two possibilities, there is a third plausible scenario: The use of a nuclear weapon by Iran to carry out an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack against Israel, the US, or Europe. Such an attack could cause severe damage to the electrical grid in the targeted nations, to the extent that the routines of daily life — centered around the use of electrical power — could be halted, for a short or even long period of time.

 

An EMP is an above-atmosphere level detonation of a nuclear device that produces enough radiation to wreak havoc with electrical systems. The blast produces a very brief but intense electromagnetic field that can quickly induce very high currents in electrical devices, shorting them out. The stronger the electromagnetic field — the “pulse” — the stronger the current, and the more likely electrical devices are to “blow out.” It’s akin to a power surge that shorts out your refrigerator or TV when too much voltage surges through the electrical outlet… on a whole other scale.

 

While there is much speculation as to what exactly an EMP would do to electrical appliances and digital devices — scientists have differences of opinion over how badly they would be affected (the world hasn’t really experienced a direct EMP blast yet, so much of the speculation is based on educated guesses) — the far-greater concern is what an attack would do to the electrical infrastructure in a targeted area. If an EMP strike is large enough, or there are enough such strikes, the blasts could knock out power plants, electrical substations, and other sensitive equipment, causing a massive power failure that may take weeks or months to overcome. Data centers housing servers would likely be badly damaged as well, as would be communications systems.

 

The EMP issue is hardly being discussed in Israel, said Dr. Emily Landau, director of the Arms Control and Regional Security Program at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies and a lecturer at Tel Aviv University. “There isn’t much discussion of it right now, but when the discussion does begin, there is no doubt that it will focus on the balance between how much it will cost to deal with, versus how likely such an attack may be,” she said.

 

Landau, an expert on Iran’s nuclear program, believes that Iran could very well be planning an EMP attack on Israel, based on statements the Iranian regime has made, and actions it has taken. And, she said, Iran would be capable of delivering an EMP attack if it acquired a nuclear weapon.

 

“Some are skeptical that Iran would use a nuclear bomb just for an EMP attack,” said Landau. “If they already have a nuclear weapon, why not use it for the main purpose for which it was designed? But while a nuclear bomb targeting an Israeli city would cause mass destruction on a local or regional basis, an EMP attack could cause even more lasting damage, destroying Israel’s electrical grid.”

 

If Iran did opt for an EMP attack, the damage to Israel would be very high, she said. “Iran doesn’t have a nuclear bomb yet, and hopefully they won’t have one, but if they do manage to build a bomb, an EMP attack is a real possibility,” Landau added. “Many people in the US are concerned about EMP now, and although the public discussion hasn’t begun in Israel yet, I expect that it will in the near future.”

 

The US Congress in 2000 established the Congressional Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack. In 2004, the committee produced a 70-page executive summary on the EMP threat, and it issued a final report on the matter in 2008. According to the report, “several potential adversaries have or can acquire the capability to attack the United States with a high-altitude nuclear weapon-generated electromagnetic pulse (EMP). A determined adversary can achieve an EMP attack capability without having a high level of sophistication.”

 

The impact would be devastating, the report said. “EMP is one of a small number of threats that can hold our society at risk of catastrophic consequences. EMP will cover the wide geographic region within line of sight to the nuclear weapon. It has the capability to produce significant damage to critical infrastructures and thus to the very fabric of US society, as well as to the ability of the United States and Western nations to project influence and military power,” it said.

 

Dr. Peter Vincent Pry was lead staffer for the Congressional committee, and he, too, is worried that Iran could use a nuclear bomb to carry out an EMP attack — on Israel and/or the US.

 

“Iran openly talks about using an EMP to attack Israel or the US,” said Pry, who is currently executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, a privately funded US group that seeks to educate the public and government leaders about the EMP threat to the US. According to Pry, Iran is actively preparing for an EMP attack. “Tehran has undertaken offshore exercises using Scud missiles fired and positioned in such a way that they exploded in the atmosphere — exactly the method you would use for an EMP attack,” he said.

 

Iran’s arsenal of atomic bombs would be no match for the US, which could obliterate any memory of Islamist Iran in a matter of minutes. But, Pry told The Times of Israel, he believes that Iran could get the most leverage out of a nuclear bomb by using it to trash large parts of the electrical grid in the US, making it easy for the Islamist regime to swoop in and act as it wishes on the world stage. “They could even marshal a major Islamic invasion of Israel, massacring the Jews and ushering in the era of the 12th Imam, the Islamic messiah, whose arrival Iran’s leadership believe is imminent,” Pry suggested grimly.

 

While EMP is a serious threat, there are steps governments can take to protect their electrical systems, according to Avi Schnurr, chairman and CEO of the Electric Infrastructure Security (EIS) Council, which works with government agencies and power companies worldwide to help coordinate international efforts on electric infrastructure protection.

 

“In the US, the estimate is that it would cost on the order of $1 billion to make the changes that would protect the power grid against EMP,” he told The Times of Israel. “I don’t have an estimate for Israel, but given the enormous difference in the sizes of the two countries and their power grids, it should be extremely affordable — no more than a fraction of a percent of Israel’s annual electric bill.”

 

“Hardening” electrical infrastructure against EMP attack would entail making some gradual changes to the power grid, such as the installation of devices like GIC (geomagnetically induced current) blockers.

 

Even if Iran were not developing a nuclear weapon, protecting the power grid in this manner would be a good idea, said Pry. “You don’t need a nuclear weapon to set off an EMP. You can also easily get a non-nuclear pulse generator,” he said. “They’re perfectly legal. A terrorist could detonate one next to an electrical station and effectively black out a city or region. Such weapons don’t do as much damage as a nuclear pulse does, but they are effective enough.”

 

In fact, when it comes to EMP, nature itself can be an enemy. “An EMP can be caused by an event like a severe solar storm,” said Pry. Such events have occurred on at least two previous occasions – including in 1859, when the largest recorded geomagnetic storm ever was recorded. British astronomer Richard Carrington observed the storm’s largest flare, which caused a major coronal mass ejection (CME) to travel directly toward the Earth — leading telegraph systems all over Europe and North America to fail, in some cases shocking telegraph operators before blowing out because of the overload of electricity in the wires. (The phenomenon is named the Carrington effect, after the astronomer.)

 

It takes political will to do what is necessary to protect the grid, said Schnurr, and that will is beginning to show itself in Western countries, including in Israel, which, Schnurr claims, is more aware, and more active in the hardening of its grid, than most countries. “Work is going on associated with protecting the grid,” continued Schnurr. There is a greater degree and breadth of awareness on this issue, which is part of the reason why efforts have been made.”

 

Cost need not be a barrier, Schnurr stressed. Relatively speaking, “the cost associated with hardening the grid is quite small,” he said. Getting it done, he said, is of the utmost priority, and that will be the great challenge of governments — from Israel to the US, and many others — in the coming period.

 

Israel Hayom | Netanyahu announces ‘digital Iron Dome’ to battle cyberattacks

October 14, 2012

Israel Hayom | Netanyahu announces ‘digital Iron Dome’ to battle cyberattacks.

Prime minister says Israel being subjected to Iranian cyberwarfare • U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta describes potential combination of cyber and physical terror as “cyber-Pearl Harbor.”

Yoni Hirsch and Ilan Gattegno
Netanyahu at a cabinet meeting. “Many attempts are being made to infiltrate Israel’s computerized systems.”

|

Photo credit: AP

Iranian and Benghazi Lies

October 14, 2012

Iranian and Benghazi Lies | Lubbock Online | Lubbock Avalanche-Journal.

Of all the lies told by the Obama Administration, those told about the Iranian nuclear weapons program and the assassination of Ambassador Christopher Stevens are among the most shocking and reprehensible.

During the Vice Presidential Debate on Thursday night, Vice President Biden claimed the intelligence the Obama White House receives is so accurate that President Obama knows the exact progress of the Iranian nuclear weapons program.  Biden claimed that if the Iranians do have enough weapons grade uranium, they cannot develop a bomb to put it in.  The Wall Street Journal commented on Saturday,

On Iran, Mr. Biden broke new ground, though most of the media missed it. To a question about the Administration’s willingness to stop the Tehran regime from going nuclear, he said what matters isn’t Iran’s ability to enrich uranium to weapons grade. It’s whether it can build and deliver a bomb.

“They are a good way away,” he said. “When my friend [Paul Ryan] talks about fissile material, they have to take this highly enriched uranium, get it from 20% up. Then they have to be able to have something to put it in. There is no weapon that the Iranians have at this point.”

“Let’s all calm down a little bit here,” Mr. Biden said a few minutes later.

In other words, Iran may have made progress toward enriching enough uranium to sufficient strength to build a bomb in the past four years, but that’s immaterial. Based on the Vice President’s intelligence, Iran isn’t close to getting the trigger mechanism, missiles and all the other things needed to deploy a weapon. So don’t worry.

Hmmm. For a decade, the U.S. and Europe have focused on coaxing and coercing the Iranians to stop enrichment above all else. That’s because this is the hardest thing about building a bomb. Iran has in any case worked to develop missiles and triggers with help from Russians, North Koreans and others. In a clearer moment this summer, Mitt Romney said he would insist that Iran not enrich any uranium, even ostensibly for peaceful purposes. He failed to repeat this demand in his foreign-policy speech this week.

To hear Mr. Biden tell it, the Obama Administration now has a new red line on Iran. The mullahs can enrich as much uranium as they wish as long as they “don’t have something to put it in.” This isn’t the red line Israel’s Bibi Netanyahu had in mind during his recent speech before the United Nations. Nor are Turkey, Saudi Arabia and others looking for proof of an Iranian ICBM before they decide to go nuclear themselves. Iran becomes a regional nuclear power when it demonstrates its ability to get the bomb at almost a moment’s notice, which is when it has developed enough fuel for it.

President Obama apparently thought if he did not bother to fortify the United States Consulate in Benghazi, the Islamic Terrorists would realize that Obama was their friend and the Terrorists would not attack the Consulate.  Ambassador Christopher Stevens understood al Qaeda far better and repeatedly requested more security.  When al Qaeda attacked the Consulate and assassinated Ambassador Stevens on 9/11/2012, Obama tried for two weeks to pretend the attack and assassination were not part of a planned Islamic Terrorist attack.

During the Thursday night Debate, Vice President Biden scapegoated the intelligence community trying to shift blame for Obama’s incompetence and naiveté onto our intelligence community,

On the attacks in Benghazi, Mr. Biden turned uncharacteristically terse. A day before the debate, a House hearing revealed that the U.S. Embassy in Libya had been concerned about a rising al Qaeda-linked Islamist threat and had requested, but was denied, security reinforcements.

“Well, we weren’t told they wanted more security again,” said Mr. Biden, contradicting the testimony of State Department officials. He also blamed “the intelligence community” for the Administration’s initial and false assertions that Ambassador Chris Stevens and three American colleagues were killed in a “spontaneous” protest against an anti-Islam video on YouTube. This is the same “intelligence community” he is sure can tell us with certainty when Iran has a bomb and the Taliban is defeated.

Asked Friday about Mr. Biden’s claims, White House spokesman Jay Carney said: “He was speaking directly for himself and for the President. He meant the White House. . . . No one who testified about this matter suggested that requests for additional security were made to the President or the White House. These are issues appropriately that are handled by security professionals at the State Department. And that’s what he was talking about.” So blame State and the intelligence community.

Also on Friday, Michael Hayden, former Director of the CIA, and Michael Chertoff, former Secretary of Homeland Security, issued a joint statement refuting the claims of Joe Biden during the Debate,

During the Vice Presidential debate, we were disappointed to see Vice President Biden blame the intelligence community for the inconsistent and shifting response of the Obama Administration to the terrorist attacks in Benghazi. Given what has emerged publicly about the intelligence available before, during, and after the September 11 attack, it is clear that any failure was not on the part of the intelligence community, but on the part of White House decision-makers who should have listened to, and acted on, available intelligence. Blaming those who put their lives on the line is not the kind of leadership this country needs.

When the American people cannot trust the Executive Branch of our Federal government to protect us because they want to make our enemies appear to be nice people, we must realize that our nation and we have been placed in grave danger by the very people we have elected and hired to protect us.

Holocaust fears haunt Israelis as they prepare for possible war with Iran – Telegraph

October 14, 2012

Holocaust fears haunt Israelis as they prepare for possible war with Iran – Telegraph.

If Israeli jets are given the order to bomb Iran’s nuclear programme, thousands of rockets could be fired in revenge. Nick Meo meets people fearful of the consequences of an airstrike – and terrified of the possible alternative.

Holocaust fears haunt Israelis as they prepare for possible war with Iran

Image 1 of 2
Israelis are preparing for the prospect of a military strike by Iran by issuing gas masks Photo: GETTY

The last time Hezbollah attacked Israel, a rocket exploded next to Adam Bloom’s house while his wife was in the shower.

“She was hysterical,” he said. Afterwards it took hours to coax her and their two terrified young daughters out of the bomb shelter where they fled.

“Hezbollah had about 10,000 rockets then but they are supposed to have more like 50,000 now, so how many will be fired at us if they start again?” said Mr Bloom, 49.

The family, whose kibbutz is 30 miles south of the Lebanon border, had thought they were safely out of range in 2006. When rockets started landing they jumped in the car and headed south with 350,000 other Israelis, to spend weeks as refugees in their own country.

This time it is not only the north that is being prepared for a new conflict, one that Israelis fear could be much worse than anything since 1973. The trigger would be the long-threatened Israeli airstrike on Iran’s nuclear programme.

The whole country is uneasily aware that Iran has giant rockets to fire back at Tel Aviv and Haifa in retaliation, and that it has armed its ally Hezbollah in Lebanon with Scuds and similar medium-range missiles, weapons it didn’t have in 2006.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the combative prime minister who keeps a portrait of Winston Churchill in his office, last week called an election in January which will be dominated by the Iran question. Victory at the polls, of which he looks sure, will give him a strong mandate to send in Israel’s pilots, the country’s greatest heroes, to drop bunker-busting bombs. To many voters it looks as if it is only American pressure that is stopping him from giving that order.

“The prime minister thinks that at this point in Jewish history responsibility for the safety and security of the Jewish people is on his shoulders,” his spokesman Mark Regev told The Sunday Telegraph.

Debate inside Israel about the decision has been agonised and at times ferocious. The civilian leadership may give the impression it is champing at the bit, but the strongest opposition to a strike has been from Israel’s security establishment.

Meir Dagan, the former head of Mossad, called the idea a “stupid thing” last year, and others have stressed that Israel may lack the firepower to cause fatal damage to the nuclear programme, and that attacking – and perhaps failing – would rally support to the Tehran regime at home and set the Middle East ablaze.

Last week Netanyahu government pushing forward its informal deadline for action into next spring – the latest of many “last chances” to stop Iran’s bomb.

But although the threat has hung over Israel for years, fear is growing as Iran’s nuclear clock ticks and little diplomatic progress is made on stopping it.

The theoretical danger of war is starting to look real. Bomb shelters are being made ready in apartment blocks and gas masks collected from post offices – the official supplier.

Residents of the biggest city Tel Aviv, which lacks bomb shelters for perhaps half its population, are going to have to use underground car parks, or just hope for the best. Schools are holding emergency drills – one father said his six-year-old came home asking why Iranians don’t like Israelis – and a television puppet called Moishe Oofnik explains homeland security to young children.

Matan Vilnai, the home defence minister, speculated in August that 500 Israelis could die in a 30-day war following an air strike, with 1,000 rockets landing each day on the land of Israel. But everyone knows this is only a guess and they wonder if the cost could be higher.

Like most of his compatriots Mr Bloom fears a replay of the war he fled with his family in 2006.

He moved to Israel from Westcliff in Essex when he was 14, fighting in the bloody Israeli invasion of Lebanon in the 1980s which was launched to clear out the Palestinian Liberation Organisation’s rocket sites.

He is filled with dread at the thought that his own children may soon have to go through a similar experience, starting when the oldest, Lilah, joins the army next year after her 18th birthday. “War is horrible. I learnt that in Lebanon,” he said.

His other daughter Dana, 15, has only a few years to wait before doing her compulsory military service while Ron, eight, is at an age when he thinks the bomb shelters are great adventure playgrounds.

There are 14 of them, ugly, concrete and squat, dotted around the landscape of tennis courts and lawns at their home in Kibbutz Amiad, a pleasant community of avocado growers.

Since 2006 the northern region has enjoyed a time of peace that it has rarely seen since 1948. Tourism has really taken off and businesses like wineries are doing an excellent trade in the green rolling hills north of the Sea of Galilee. All this could be ruined in a rain of high explosive.

But what Israelis really dread is the prospect of Iran getting nuclear weapons. “We’re a small country, about the size of Wales. They only need to drop four or five Hiroshima-sized bombs and there won’t be many of us left,” said Mr Bloom.

“I don’t think ordinary Iranians hate Jews but their president Ahmadinejad does. When he opens his mouth, he might as well have a little moustache and a slanty haircut.

“It’s a tough one for us, difficult to know what Israel should do. Israel has always fought preventative wars, and when you have this nutter threatening us you hope for a diplomatic solution. But can we wait?”

A terrifying homemade film imaging what could happen if Iran gets the bomb has made many Israelis question whether they should wait.

Israel’s Last Day, viewed half a million times on Youtube, imagines a young couple driving to her mother’s home during an Iranian air attack when nuclear bombs explode. The five-minute film, made with amateur actors for extra realism, and computer-generated mushroom clouds, is a nightmarish vision from video-editor Ronen Barany, 33.

“I wanted to produce something shocking, to wake people up,” he said at his home outside Jerusalem. “It took Hitler six years to kill six million Jews. It would take Ahmadinejad six minutes.” Mr Barany, a father of two, was born in Romania. Many of his relatives died at Auschwitz.

He does not relish the prospect of a new war and hopes that diplomacy will end Iran’s nuclear programme. If that fails he thinks an American attack would be the best option.

“I don’t fully trust America though – in the end Israelis can’t trust anybody except ourselves,” he said.

He is sure that Israelis are coming round to the necessity of an air raid on Iran. “Two years ago nobody wanted to think about this. But today people worry that Iran is capable of doing something crazy. The fear is that the fanatics will do one last terrible thing when their regime is dying. People are starting to say, ‘let’s do something before it is too late’. We had one Holocaust. We don’t want another one.”

His Israeli friends who have joint citizenship with another country are starting to get foreign passports up to date, he said.

If Iran gets a bomb, there is a haunting fear that families will start leaving Israel for greater safety abroad, perhaps crippling an economy that has been roaring along in recent years.

For that reason alone many Israelis believe an Iranian bomb would be impossible to live with. Michael Herzog, a retired Brigadier-General and former Chief of Staff, said: “If Iran is not stopped by sanctions and the US is not going to do anything, it is very possible the current leadership will decide on a strike – and do not underestimate Israel’s capacity to do real damage to the nuclear programme.

“Israelis have to take the threat more seriously than Europeans and Americans. We are much nearer to Iran. And given the nature of that regime, how can anyone believe in containing Iran?”

Rocket attacks on Israel that would follow an airstrike, coupled with Iranian-backed terror attacks around the world, would be a challenge, but not a doomsday scenario, he said.

“In the end this is going to be extremely difficult, the toughest decision that an Israeli prime minister has had to take since the inception of Israel in 1948.”

The government is starting to stress the lesson from history of 1981, when Israeli jets struck an Iraqi reactor in Operation Babylon – against the advice of Mossad. Ronald Reagan was furious. But Saddam Hussein never got the bomb he wanted. Syria’s nuclear programme was also ended by an Israeli air strike in 2007.

By no means all Israelis support the option of a strike on Iran. Opinion polls in the past couple of years have shown only a minority in favour, although support has grown as the danger or Iranian nuclear weapons becomes more imminent..

One Israeli couple, teachers Michal Tamir and Ronny Edry, have started a campaign called “Israel loves Iran” to try to remind Israelis that their enemies are human, and to reassure Iranians.

They have paid for a poster on 70 Tel Aviv buses with the slogan: “Iranians: we will never bomb your country” and say nearly 30,000 Iranians “like” their FaceBook page. Ms Tamir said: “These are people with families. They are as afraid for their children as I am for mine.”

The campaign, the most high-profile peace campaign in Israel at the moment, is critical of Mr Netanyahu’s “macho” approach to the crisis, and claims the Israeli government is playing a game of fear.

But Mr Edry, an army veteran like everyone else in the country, admits that he is worried about the danger from an Iranian bomb, and he does not think Israel should rule out a strike on Iran.

“It’s a tough one. We live in the Middle East, not Switzerland. But for me it is a last resort, not something you should wish for.”

IDF Gets Tough – Third Strike in 24 Hours

October 14, 2012

IDF Gets Tough – Third Strike in 24 Hours – Defense/Security – News – Israel National News.

The IDF foiled a terrorist attack early Sunday in the third counterterrorist strike in 24 hours, sending a clear massage to Hamas.

By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

First Publish: 10/14/2012, 8:04 AM

 

 A Palestinian Salafist holds an Al-Qaeda-affiliated flag during a protest  in Gaza

A Palestinian Salafist holds an Al-Qaeda-affiliated flag during a protest in Gaza
AFP photo

The IDF foiled a terrorist attack early Sunday in the third counterterrorist strike in 24 hours, sending a clear massage to Hamas.

The Air Force successfully targeted a cell preparing to fire at Israelis, an IDF spokesmen said. The latest counterterrorist measure killed at least one terrorist.

On Saturday, Air Force jets struck three terrorist targets in northern and central Gaza in retaliation for a Grad missile attack on Netivot Friday night.

In the pre-dawn hours of Sunday, the Air Force struck a second time in a significant counterterrorist action that eliminated two senior terrorists on motorbikes. They were identified as Jordanian national Sheikh Hisham al-Saedini, 43, also known as Abu Al-Waleed Al-Maqdissi, of the Mujahedeen Shura, and fellow Salafist Islamic terrorist Fayek Abu Jazar, 42. News services described him as an “activist.”

Saedini was one of the founders of the Mujahedeen Shura in Jerusalem. The terrorist group operated as part of the worldwide Jihadist war and was involved in several attacks and plots against Israeli civilians and soldiers.

The Mujahedeen Shura carried out the January 2009 attack on an arty patrol, killing one soldier and seriously wounding an officer. The same terrorist group also planted dozens of bombs along the IDF patrol route at the Gaza security fence and also fired on soldiers.

Saedini at one time was jailed by Hamas for his activities in the rival terrorist organization but was released in August despite Hamas’s knowledge of his involvement in terrorism.

Israel’s counterterrorist actions have intensified the past week.

Before the three strikes in the last 24 hours, Israeli jets on Thursday raided a Hamas training several hours after Gaza terrorists fired two rockets into southern Israel.

On Wednesday, the Israeli air force struck targets in northern Gaza after rocket fire that was also claimed by the Mujahedeen Shura Council.

Earlier in the week, the armed wings of Hamas and Islamic Jihad launched a barrage of fire at southern Israel– a day after the Air Force raided the southern city of Rafiah, targeting two global jihad activists, one of whom died. The other was critically wounded.

The continuation of Gaza rocket fire on Israel by Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists marked a rare show of force given that the two groups normally claim they observe a de facto truce.

More than 480 rockets or mortar rounds have been fired at southern Israel from Gaza this year, according to the IDF.

‘Hezbollah drone photographed secret IDF bases

October 14, 2012

‘Hezbollah drone photographed secret IDF bases… JPost – Defense.

By JPOST.COM STAFF
10/14/2012 08:53
Report in ‘Sunday Times’ says UAV struck down over Negev had beamed live images of IDF preparation for joint US exercise, missile sites, airfields and perhaps Dimona reactor.

IAF shoots down UAV that entered Israeli airspace

Photo: IDF Spokesman’s Office

The Hezbollah drone that infiltrated the Negev last week beamed back live images of secret Israeli military bases, the Sunday Times reported on Sunday.

According to the report, the drone was airborne for three hours before being intercepted by an F-16I jet. It is believed to have transmitted pictures of preparations for Israel’s joint military exercise with the US, as well as ballistic missile sites, airfields and, perhaps, the nuclear reactor in Dimona, the Sunday Times reported.

The report also stated the interception of the drone was “botched” when the first missile fired by the Israeli jet missed. The aircraft had traveled 200 miles, the program claimed.

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah took credit on Thursday sending the drone aircraft into Israel on Saturday, saying in a televised speech on the Al- Manar station that it was Iranian-made and that it was shot down near the Dimona reactor.

“The drone flew over sensitive installations inside southern Palestine,” he said.

Nasrallah claimed the Ayoub drone was designed and manufactured in Iran and assembled in Lebanon, denying reports that the drone was a Russian design.

The Hezbollah leader said the drone was sent as a response to what he referred to as Israel’s violations of Lebanese airspace since 2006.

“This flight was not our first will not be our last, and we give assurances we can reach any point we want. We have the right to dispatch recon planes over occupied Palestine at any time,” Nasrallah said.

Earlier that day, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said Israel would “act with determination to defend its borders at sea, on air and land” just as it had “thwarted Hezbollah’s attempt over the weekend,” to send an unmanned aircraft into Israeli airspace.

Gil Hoffman and Joanna Paraszczuk contributed to this report.

Spreading Iranian cyber attacks hit Israeli military, US financial and Gulf oil targets

October 14, 2012

Spreading Iranian cyber attacks hit Israeli military, US financial and Gulf oil targets.

DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis October 13, 2012, 5:39 PM (GMT+02:00)

Tags:  Leon Panetta   Iran   cyber war   Syria   Israel   UAV 

A week ago, on Oct. 6, an unmanned Iranian aerial vehicle with stealth attributes breached Israeli air space. By eluding Israel’s radar, the UAV exposed serious gaps in its air defenses. Thursday, Oct. 11, Hizballah’s Hassan Nasrallah admitting the drone had come from Lebanon, promised it would not be the last. He seemed to be mocking Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his reliance on strong border fences to keep Israel safe.
A week went by and Saturday, Oct. 13, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) website quoted its chief, Lt. Gen. Ali Jabari as stating that his naval and missile forces are on “strategic deterrent readiness” – a novel term just invented by the Islamic Republic. He spoke Friday at an army base in Khorrasan, during a tour with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Iranian general hinted that the Iranian-Hizballah drone had been able to come close to Israel’s nuclear reactor in Dimona.
Both admissions that Iran and Hizballah were conducting military cyber warfare on Israel were tinged with contempt, arising from the certainty that Israel would not retaliate for the UAV’s invasion any more than it had responded to the posting of thousands of Iranian elite Al Qods troops just across its Syrian and Lebanese borders.
Shortly after Nasrallah spoke, the US Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan managed to break through VP Joe Biden’s interruptions to reveal the stark fact that Iran already possesses enough fissile material to make five nuclear bombs.  The cat was finally out of the bag after years in which American and Israeli leaders contrived to keep this secret dark by verbal acrobatics and blinding showers of impenetrable “facts and figures.”
It was no slip of the tongue: Mitt Romney’s running mate was briefed by the team which is preparing the candidate himself for his second debate against President Barack Obama next Tuesday, Oct. 16.

debkafile’s Washington sources disclose that the team is headed by the former US ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, who is slated for the job of National Security Adviser if Romney wins the Nov. 6 election.
Ryan’s revelation implied that a Romney administration’s Iran policy would take off from the point of its possession of sufficient fissile material for a nuclear arsenal.

Not that this guarantees US military action against Iran’s nuclear program under a new president – or even backing for an Israeli strike – only that now we all know that it is not necessary to destroy the 20 or more Iranian nuclear sites to demolish its program, only to home in on the stockpile of fissile material which took Tehran 20 years to enrich and accumulate.
The Iranians, realizing their secret was out, are certainly not hiding their precious fissile stockpile of approximately one ton at the Fordo nuclear enrichment plant which continues to turn out more enriched uranium. This stock encased in a lead container no bigger than a large kitchen table could be concealed anywhere in the vast 1.6 million-square-kilometer area of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
So a fleet of bombers and array of bunker buster bombs have become dispensable for pre-empting Iran’s nuclear bomb aspirations. All that is needed is one missile – provided of course that the vital core stock can be located.
Also on Thursday, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta unveiled his “pre-9/11 moment” speech which revealed that for two weeks, hackers had been hammering the websites of big American banks, the Saudi national oil company Aramco and Qatar’s Rasgas.

In a strong comment, he said the US would strike back and consider a preemptive strike against cyber terrorism, without saying how or actually naming Iran.
However in leaks to the American media, former U.S. government officials and cyber-security experts reported that the administration believes Iranian-based hackers were responsible for what Panetta warned could be the first “cyber Pearl Harbor” against America.
The Wall Street Journal pointed to a team of 100 Iranian experts as the perpetrators of the cyber attacks on America and the Gulf oil states.
Tehran appears to be sending a message that if US-led sanctions continue to cut down its oil exports and restrict its banking business, Gulf oil producers and American banks would pay the price.
Panetta’s words may therefore be read as Washington’s final warning to Iran to desist from cyber warfare.

In the days leading up to his speech on cyber-terror, the defense secretary was tireless in cautioning against the menace of the Syrian civil war spreading to neighboring countries and evoking Bashar Assad’s threat to bring out and use his chemical weapons.
Before he turned to the cyber threat, the Syrian war had indeed tipped over into an escalating Turkish-Syrian showdown.
Both these developments mean that the waves of Middle East violence are lapping ever farther afield. All the parties with an interest in stirring up trouble are keeping a weather eye on the Obama-Romney debate next Tuesday to see if the president recovers the momentum he lost to his Republican challenger in the first debate.
Before or after the debate, each of them – Al Qaeda, Iran, Syria or Hizballah – is capable of taking direct action to show it is a player to be reckoned with.  Such action may explicitly target an American interest or stir the pot by going for Israel, Turkey, Jordan, or a Gulf oil nation.
It can no longer be denied that Tehran is already on a cyber offensive against them all. In the absence of any response, Iran may decide to push further against its targets.