Archive for August 10, 2012

Top Israel official: Iran nuclear threat bigger than one Israel faced before Six-Day War

August 10, 2012

Top Israel official: Iran nuclear threat bigger than one Israel faced before Six-Day War – Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

According to the official, if Iran obtains nuclear arms, it will goad its neighbors and adversaries and will be unstoppable.

By Ari Shavit | Aug.10, 2012 | 1:49 AM
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.449295.1344574323!/image/136231539.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_640/136231539.jpg

A senior Israeli official has told Haaretz that the situation on the Iranian front is more critical now than the situation Israel faced in the tense days prior to the 1967 war.

“The sword at our throat is a lot sharper than the sword at our throat before the Six-Day War,” the official said.

For the first time, the official broached the claim that Israel would drag the United States into an attack on Iran.

“We will absolutely not deliberately drag the United States into a war. If we decide to undertake an operation, it must be an operation that does not rely on the expectation of igniting some large chain reaction. A country does not go to war in the hope or expectation that another country will join it. Such an act would be an irresponsible gamble.”

However the official, known for his sharp analytical skills, said the question was “How you define backing,” and continued: “Was there backing in the Six-Day War? Do you think that in 1967 the Americans told Foreign Minister Abba Eban and Mossad chief Meir Amit anything different than what they’re telling us now? But then Eban saw difficulty in the opportunity and Amit saw an opportunity in the difficulty, and the Eshkol government made a decision. And what was that all about? About the closure of the Straits of Tiran?

According to the official, if Iran obtains nuclear arms, it will goad its neighbors and adversaries and will be unstoppable. “What happened in the Rhine in 1936 will be child’s play compared to what will happen with Iran,” he said, referring to the entry of German forces into the Rhineland in 1936 in violation of the Treaty of Versailles.

“All the moderate forces around us will be significantly weakened and heavy storm clouds will gather over the Middle East. The region will not be the same region and the world will not be the same world, and our lives will not be the same either. We will live under the shadow of a permanent storm,” the official said.

“Israel is a strong nation,” he continued. “We have good capabilities. The number of dead to be expected on the home front in the event of war with Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas is less than the number of casualties in the Fourth Battalion of the Harel Brigade in 1948. But in 1948 it was clear to all that there was no choice. And that gave us national strength and resilience. If it turns out that now, too, there is no choice, we will also need that national strength. Remember that in any dimension – including in terms of preserving human life – dealing with a nuclear Iran will be much more complicated than dealing with preventing a nuclear Iran,” the official said.

Iranian defiance

August 10, 2012

Iranian defiance – Israel Opinion, Ynetnews.

Ephraim Halevy

Published: 08.09.12, 23:41 / Israel Opinion

Tuesday’s visit by Iranian Supreme National Security Council head Saeed Jalili to Damascus marked a sharp escalation in The Islamic Republic’s involvement in Syria‘s fate. His public appearance on national Syrian television and declaration that Iran would not allow Assad‘s regime to fall indicate that Iran has decided to take responsibility for the developments and Syria and that Assad has embraced Tehran’s patronage.

Jalili made it clear that Iran’s position vis-à-vis Syria is based on its regional strategy and the axis of defiance it has created over the years in the northern arc surrounding Israel. Iran even declared publicly that this axis will not only continue to exist – but will grow stronger.

The campaign Iran has been conducting over the past few decades consists of a number of key elements: A global terror campaign, both covert and overt, against Jewish, Israeli and other interests; and training non-state actors, such as Hezbollah in the north, and Hamasand Islamic Jihad in the south; in addition, Iran has launched an intense and cruel intelligence war – most of it secret – in different locations around the world. This, of course, is just a partial list.

The escalation of its involvement in Syria was mainly an act of defiance by Shiite Iran against Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Qatar – three Sunni Arab countries. It was also a hostile and threatening act against secular and Sunni Turkey, which has a host of interests in neighboring Syria – a joint border; the effect Syria’s Kurds have on Turkey‘s domestic Kurdish problem, and more.

The Iranian foreign minster was in Ankara on the same day Jalili was in Damascus, but it’s highly unlikely that his explanations will ally Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan‘s concerns. The Iranian maneuvering also poses a direct threat to the US, which is working to overthrow the murderous Syrian regime. Jalili has openly stated that Iran holds Washington responsible for the fate of 48 Iranian Revolutionary Guard members who were captured by Syrian opposition forces.

Iran’s increased involvement in Syria is not only indicative of its growing audacity, but also of how crucial the fight for Syria’s future is to Iran’s status in the region – and perhaps to the survival of the regime in Tehran. This is Iran’s Achilles’ heel. More than 20 years ago Saddam Hussein forced then-Iranian leader Ayatollah Khomeini to agree to a ceasefire and end the eight-year war between Iran and Iraq. Drunk with power after his victory, Hussein announced in the spring of 1990 that he can burn half of the State of Israel.

We knew then that he wanted to avenge the destruction of Iraq’s nuclear reactor by pursuing three separate plans to obtain nuclear weapons. In August of that same year Hussein made the worst mistake of his life – he invaded Kuwait and seized its oil wells. It was a sudden move that prompted the US to form an international coalition which went to war to liberate Kuwait – and at the same time succeeded in thwarting all of Iraq’s nuclear plans.

Jalili’s visit to Syria was also aimed at telling Israel– we are here, on your northern border, not by way of our proxy (Hezbollah) or another non-state actor (Gaza), but with our own units and policies. We are here, in broad daylight, and we plan on staying, come what may.

Iran’s increased involvement in the region poses an immediate threat to Israel, but it also offers a rare opportunity which, if handled wisely, can turn Jalili’s maneuvering in Damascus into a strategic mistake which can severely weaken the regime in Tehran – similar to the mistake Iraq made when it invaded Kuwait.  

Ephraim Halevy is a former director of Mossad