Archive for June 19, 2012

A comment from the UK…

June 19, 2012

( I felt this deserved more attention than in the comments section. – JW )

Sometimes Joseph, some of here in the UK, non Jewish people who strongly support Israel, we feel that you Israelis are the modern day equivalent of Leonidas and his Spartans holding off the Persians for us. Until we come to our senses and support you.

We are not the commentators and politicians, who seem to use every opportunity to degenerate your country. We are the ordinary people who admire your resolution, your bravery and your clear-sighted view of the Iranian threat.

I hope that you will be able to persuade Obama to do what most Americans seem to want-to support you in the removal of an increasing threat from Iran, not just to you but to the whole free world and Sunnis everywhere. Now.

It probably does not give you much help just to wish you well, if Obama continues his dithering, in an attempt to defer action until after the Presidential election, and you thus have to go alone on Iran but I can assure you that there will be at least one Brit’ cheering you on and praying for your success. I believe that there will be many more.

On a more general note, congratulations on a brilliant, informative and factual site, which should be required reading by all interested in the subject.

I wish you, personally, better health and happier days from here in the UK. Thank you for all you do.

From Blimp

Hamas claims responsibility for rocket fire into Israel

June 19, 2012

Hamas claims responsibility for rocket fire in… JPost – Defense.

By JPOST.COM STAFF

 

06/19/2012 10:41
In significant departure from previous position, Gaza-based terror group claims responsibility for at least 3 mortars fired into Israel, says responding to recent killing of Palestinians; 6 rockets slam into South overnight.

Smoke seen as rockets are fired from Gaza.

Photo: REUTERS

Hamas on Tuesday took responsibility for at least some of the rocket fire aimed at Israeli civilians Monday night, stating that it was responding to the killing of Palestinians in recent days. The IAF killed four Palestinian terrorists in the last 24 hours, at least two of whom were members of the Islamic Jihad terrorist group.

In a statement released by Hamas’s armed wing, Izzaddin al- Kassam, the group said that it fired three mortars aimed at an IDF base in Zikim.

The announcement marks a significant departure from its previous position, as during the last round of violence Hamas refrained from firing rockets into Israel.

Palestinian terrorist fired six rockets into Israel overnight Monday but failed to cause damage or injuries.

The Israel Air Force early Tuesday morning struck a terrorist cell which was in the process of planting an explosive device near the border with Central Gaza, confirming a direct hit. Two Palestinians, both believe to be Islamic Jihad operatives, were killed. The attack marked the third airstrike in twenty four hours, and followed followed a continuing escalation between Israel and Gaza terror groups.

Earlier Monday, a terror cell operating from Sinai crossed into Israel, killing a construction worker near the border fence. A force from the Golani Brigade immediately arrived at the scene, killing two terrorists in the ensuing gunfight.

Hours after the attack, an IAF aircraft targeted a motorbike, killing two Islamic Jihad men who were part of a terror cell responsible for recent shooting attacks along the border.

Yaakov Katz contributed to this story.

South under fire: 4 rockets fired at Ashkelon

June 19, 2012

South under fire: 4 rockets fired at Ashkelon – Israel News, Ynetnews.

( Here we go again… Sigh! – JW )

Palestinians fire rockets at south early Tuesday which reportedly hit open areas south of Ashkelon. Hamas’ military wing claims responsibility for attack

Yoav Zitun

Published: 06.19.12, 07:54 / Israel News

Several hours after the Air Force struck Gaza, rockets were fired at the Ashkelon area as air raid sirens sounded in the region. The IDF detected the launching of four rockets, which apparently hit open areas south of Ashkelon. No injuries or damage were reported.

Hamas‘ military wing Izz al-Din al-Qassam brigades claimed responsibility for the attack. A statement by the group said that the rockets were meant to hit the Zikim army base. On Tuesday, alert level in the Gaza vicinity communities was raised. Residents of the Eshkol Regional Council were instructed to remain 15 seconds away from a fortified space.

Air Force aircraft fired at a Palestinian terror cell early Tuesday as its members were attempting to plant an explosive device near the central Gaza Strip border fence.

The army said the attack target was hit. Palestinian sources later confirmed that the strike left casualties on the Palestinian side; no further details were provided.

“The IDF will not tolerate any bid to harm the State of Israel’s citizens and IDF soldiers and will continue to operate against any element that utilizes terror against the State of Israel,” the military said following the strike. “The Hamas terror group is the address and it bears the responsibility.”

On Monday, Two Palestinian terrorists were killed when Israeli aircraft targeted a rocket-launching cell in northern Gaza.

The aerial strike came just a few hours after Palestinian terrorists fired a rocket from Gaza towards the Hof Ashkelon Regional Council. There were no reports of injury or damage.

Earlier Monday, at around noon, the Israel Air Force struck targets in the northern Gaza Strip. Palestinian sources said two Islamic Jihad terrorists were killed in the attack.

According to Palestinian reports, the two were targeted while riding a motorcycle near the north Gaza town of Beit Hanoun.

Elior Levy contributed to this report

Face to Face, Obama Tries to Persuade Putin on Syria

June 19, 2012

Syria Dominates Obama and Putin’s Meeting – NYTimes.com.

Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

President Obama met with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia at the Group of 20 summit in Los Cabos, Mexico, on Monday.

SAN JOSÉ DEL CABO, Mexico — President Obama and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir V. Putin, finally had their face-to-face meeting on Monday, as Mr. Obama pressed Mr. Putin to work with him to ease President Bashar al-Assad of Syria out of power, a move increasingly viewed by the West as the only way to end the bloodshed that has been under way there for more than a year.

But after two full hours together, Mr. Putin was still balking, appearing afterward with Mr. Obama before reporters in a grim tableau that seemed to bespeak the frustration on both sides. During the few minutes that it took their handlers to usher reporters out of the room after their prepared remarks, the two leaders remained seated, side by side, staring straight ahead, with none of the interaction or small talk that leaders usually engage in before the cameras. “We agreed that we need to see a cessation of the violence, that a political process has to be created to prevent civil war,” Mr. Obama said.

During the meeting, American officials said, Mr. Putin spent considerable time pointing to what the Russians view as failed examples of political transition in Egypt and Libya as well as their concern that the West does not have a credible plan for what would happen to Syria’s various battling factions and ethnic groups if Mr. Assad stepped down from power.

Mr. Obama made a long and detailed effort to reassure Mr. Putin that the United States does not want to come between Russia and Syria, a strategic ally that Russia views as its last real bastion of influence in the region, the officials said. The Americans acknowledged that Russian officials have not really believed them when they have made these assurances in the past; Monday’s meeting, they said, provided Mr. Obama the chance to try to make this case personally to Mr. Putin.

“We have found many common points on this issue,” Mr. Putin allowed in his own remarks after the meeting, adding that the two countries would continue discussions.

Mr. Obama described the meeting — rescheduled for this gathering of Group of 20 leaders after Mr. Putin canceled his trip to an economic summit meeting Mr. Obama held at Camp David last month — as “candid, thoughtful and thorough.”

But American officials did not try hard to paint the meeting between the men as full of bonhomie and good cheer. “I thought the chemistry was very businesslike, cordial,” Michael McFaul, the United States ambassador to Russia, told reporters in an effort to push back against any negative impressions the body language between the two presidents might have suggested. “There was nothing extraordinary” about Mr. Putin’s dour demeanor, Mr. McFaul said. “That’s the way he looks, that’s the way he acts.”

Now that Mr. Obama and Mr. Putin have gotten this first meeting out of the way and listened to each other’s explanation for why Mr. Assad should, or should not, be pushed aside in Syria, United States officials say they hope they will be able to move forward.

“I think there was agreement that there needs to be a political process, that it cannot be just a cease-fire,” said Benjamin Rhodes, the director for strategic communications with the National Security Council. “Obviously the United States believes that political process needs to include Bashar al-Assad stepping down from power.”

Also on the agenda for Mr. Obama and Mr. Putin was the effort by the United States and Russia, along with Europe and China, to rein in Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Even as they were meeting on the outskirts of a world economic summit gathering here in Mexico, tough talks on Iran’s nuclear program were under way in Moscow. Mr. Obama said he and Mr. Putin had “emphasized our shared approach” and agreed that there was still time for diplomacy to work.

Mr. Obama’s attempt to reset relations with Russia had begun with Mr. Putin’s predecessor, Dmitri A. Medvedev, who only two and a half months ago said that “these were perhaps the best three years of relations between Russia and the United States over the last decade.”

But this first meeting between these outsize personalities as leaders of their respective countries could not have come at a more fraught time. Russia and the United States are clashing over a series of difficult issues: the American deployment of a missile defense system that Mr. Putin considers a threat; pending legislation in Congress that blocks visas and freezes assets of Russian officials linked to human rights abuses; and statements from the State Department about the protests that greeted Mr. Putin’s inauguration that left the Russian leader fuming.

But the biggest irritant of all right now is Syria, a longtime ally whose leader Russia has continued to defend in the face of condemnation from the West over Mr. Assad’s bloody crackdown on protesters who support democracy. Russia has opposed Western intervention and, by some accounts, continues to arm Mr. Assad’s forces. On Saturday, the United Nations suspended its observer mission in Syria because of the escalating violence. The move was widely viewed as an attempt to press Russia to intervene to assure that the observers are not targeted by Syrian forces or their sympathizers.

The renewed tensions come as the United States is heavily dependent on Russian cooperation for its military operations in Afghanistan. With Pakistan cutting off supply lines to Afghanistan, the so-called northern distribution network through Russia is the primary reinforcement route for America’s war on the Taliban.

That all of this is happening in the middle of an election campaign is not lost on the White House, especially given the recent assertion by Mitt Romney, Mr. Obama’s Republican opponent, that Russia is America’s biggest strategic threat. The comments were widely ridiculed in foreign policy circles but nonetheless felt in Moscow.

The Obama administration dismissed Mr. Romney’s remarks as election-year posturing, but given that they came just as Mr. Putin has been doing some muscle-flexing of his own, it has put Mr. Obama in a difficult position as he tries to persuade Mr. Putin of America’s good intentions — or, at least, its lack of ill intentions — toward Russia.