Archive for June 11, 2012

US exempts India and six others from Iran sanctions

June 11, 2012

US exempts India and six others from Iran sanctions – Channel NewsAsia.

WASHINGTON: The United States said on Monday it would exempt seven emerging economies including India from tough new sanctions after they cut back on oil from Iran, but the punishment still loomed for China.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton added India, Malaysia, South Africa, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Turkey and Taiwan to the list of those exempt from the sanctions. In March, she made exemptions for European Union nations and Japan.

The decision was announced two days before Clinton meets Indian officials for annual talks. The move resolves one of the biggest points of tension in years in the growing relationship between the world’s two largest democracies.

Under a law approved last year that irritated some US allies, the United States starting on June 28 will penalise foreign financial institutions over transactions with Iran’s central bank, which handles sales of the country’s key export.

Clinton said the seven economies exempted on Monday have all “significantly” reduced crude oil purchases from Iran. She cast the exemptions as proof of success in the US campaign to put pressure on Iran’s clerical regime, which Israel and some Western officials fear is seeking a nuclear bomb.

“By reducing Iran’s oil sales, we are sending a decisive message to Iran’s leaders: until they take concrete actions to satisfy the concerns of the international community, they will continue to face increasing isolation and pressure,” Clinton said in a statement.

However, the United States did not announce an exemption for China – which is heavily dependent on oil from Iran and elsewhere to power its giant economy. Officials said that the United States remained in talks with Beijing.

“We have informed our Chinese colleagues fully about the scope and urgency” of the sanctions, a senior US official told reporters on condition of anonymity.

But the official said that China – one of six nations in talks with Iran that resume next week in Moscow – was a “very important partner” on the nuclear row.

“We may have different perceptions of sanctions at different times, but one of the things that has been very important is that China has agreed to this dual-track process of pressure as well as persuasion,” the official said.

China’s President Hu Jintao called Friday on Iran to be “flexible and pragmatic” on its nuclear program. Some industry experts say that China, despite its public stance, has been quietly diversifying from Iranian oil.

A number of countries were angered by the US law, arguing that only the UN Security Council has the right to slap sanctions and that the reductions in oil would jeopardise an already shaky economic recovery.

But Iran’s arch-rival Saudi Arabia has opened its spigots to make up for any shortfall from Tehran. To the surprise of some forecasters, oil prices have been declining despite the tensions surrounding Iran.

India said last month that it would cut its purchases of Iranian oil by 11 percent. The decrease is below that pledged by several other countries, but marked a change from New Delhi’s initial protests.

India is highly dependent on oil imports and historically has enjoyed warm relations with Iran. But India was eager to play down the dispute when Clinton visited last month to prepare for this week’s annual talks.

President Barack Obama’s administration hopes to exert economic pressure on Iran in part to avert an attack by Israel, whose prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has not ruled out the use of force.

Administration officials have repeatedly voiced fear that an Israeli strike would be devastating and potentially fuel an arms race in the region.

Clinton, in her statement, renewed her call on Iran to “engage seriously” to resolve international concerns.

“Iran has the ability to address these concerns by taking concrete steps during the next round of talks in Moscow. I urge its leaders to do so,” Clinton said.

Iran contends that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. US intelligence, while concerned about Iran, has not concluded that Iran is building a nuclear weapon.

– AFP/de

Ariel Sharon and the rise of Iran’s nuclear threat

June 11, 2012

Ariel Sharon and the rise of Iran’s n… JPost – Opinion – Op-Eds.

By MOSHE DANN
06/10/2012 22:24
On December 18, 2009, Aluf Benn, Amos Harel, offered one of the most important insights into Israeli policy on Iran.

Sharon, Yaalon
Photo: (Ariel Jerozolimski
On December 18, 2009, Aluf Benn and Amos Harel, writing in Haaretz, offered one of the most important insights into Israeli policy regarding the Iranian nuclear threat.

“When Netanyahu was finance minister in Ariel Sharon’s cabinet, he urged Sharon to focus on the struggle against Iran. When Netanyahu resigned over the disengagement plan, and Sharon left Likud and established Kadima, Netanyahu told Sharon that if he acted against Iran before the election, Netanyahu would support him. Sharon did not act.” (Neither did Netanyahu – MD).

“The uranium conversion plant in Isfahan has an important function in the chain of Iran’s nuclear program. It first went into operation in 2004… [and] since 2004, hundreds of kilograms… were sent to the enrichment plant in Natanz [stored in] underground tunnels.”

“It is possible that years ago, the problem of Iran’s nuclear project could have been solved by one tough blow and with relatively minimal risk. At the time, the project was dependent on one facility… Isfahan. If it had been bombed, Iran would have lost large quantities of raw material for uranium enrichment, and its nuclear program would have been set back years. But nothing happened.”

Why not? Benn and Harel did not answer this crucial question, nor did the media pick up their observation. Was the IAF incapable? Did Israel lack essential information? Was America, bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan, reluctant to agree? Was Israel misled by faulty intelligence reports that the Iranians were not developing nuclear weapons? According to a senior military advisor, the IDF and IAF instituted operational plans to bomb the Iranian facility, but the political echelon opposed any action.

In hindsight, the decision not to bomb the Iranian facility was a gigantic mistake that changed the course of history.

There was, however, another reason for Sharon’s inattention: criminal charges against him and his sons and his preoccupation with unilateral withdrawal from Gaza and Northern Shomron.

The “Disengagement,” which took place in August 2005, took a year to prepare, mobilized massive resources and cost billions of shekels. Focused on expelling Jews from their homes and destroying 25 communities, Sharon ignored the primary and critical threat to Israel’s existence.

Three other people (at least) share responsibility for Israel’s blunder: defense minister Shaul Mofaz, vice prime minister Shimon Peres and Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz, then commander of the IAF, designated in February, 2005 to replace Lt.-Gen. Moshe Ya’alon as IDF Chief of Staff (who opposed Sharon’s policy). Enthusiastic supporters of Sharon’s plans to evacuate Jews, they overlooked Iran in what seems to have been a pattern of confused decision-making.

Mossad directors Efriam Halevy and Meir Dagan played down the Iranian threat; Maj.-Gen. Giora Eiland, head of National Security Council, was tasked with the withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. Virtually the entire military and political echelon was focused on destroying Jewish communities, not on Iran.

Similarly, in 2006, prime minister Ehud Olmert, in the midst of the war in Lebanon, announced his intention to evacuate more settlements. Seemingly irrelevant, it dramatically illustrates his obsession with further unilateral withdrawals from and destruction of Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria.

Had the Israeli government prepared for war with Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas instead of attacking tiny hilltop communities, the outcome of the Second Lebanon War would have been different. Instead, the Iranian threat was lost on Israel’s radar.

A year later (2007) Haaretz reported that foreign minister Tzipi Livni believed “Iranian nuclear arms pose little threat to Israel.” Once again, the focus was to destroy settlements, not Iran and its proxies.

The war in Lebanon was not a military defeat. It was a political defeat which allowed Hezbollah to control south Lebanon and dominate the government, while Hamas consolidated its rule in Gaza. Because Olmert’s primary agenda was political, not military, instead of defeating Hezbollah, he legitimized them. He failed to respond effectively to Hamas terror attacks until, in an effort to gain position in the coming election, he authorized the Cast Lead operation into Gaza.

When Binyamin Netanyahu became prime minister in 2009 and appointed Uzi Arad to head the National Security Council, Israel’s Iran policy became a priority. By then, however, Iran had multiple nuclear centers, a well-developed program, and the new Obama administration was more concerned about Israeli plans to build apartments in east Jerusalem and stopping all settlement activity.

Although its Iranian policy is more realistic, however, the Israeli government seems again caught on the hook of the settlement issue.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak, with Prime Minister Netanyahu’s approval, is intent on carrying out his private political agenda to destroy settlements despite widespread opposition from government ministers and Knesset.

Instead of developing a coherent national policy his call for unilateral withdrawal, like those implemented by Sharon and planned by Olmert, distracts from more serious issues – e.g. a compromised judicial system, crime and corruption, social and economic inequality, monopolies and cartels, and the infiltration of hundreds of thousands of illegal Africans.

The failure to bomb Iran under Sharon and Olmert-led administrations, entangled in the “two-state” delusion and an obsession with Jews living in Yesha, fits a pattern.

Although Netanyahu and others have spoken eloquently about the Iranian threat, the international community is unwilling to act decisively and it is unlikely that Israel will act unilaterally. As Israel faces increasing demonization and threats to its legitimacy and its very existence, it also confronts a domestic crisis – and an ideological one as well.

The issue is the sovereignty of the Jewish People in the Land of Israel. We dare not lose that focus.

Researchers Connect Flame to U.S.-Israel Stuxnet Attack | Threat Level | Wired.com

June 11, 2012

Researchers Connect Flame to U.S.-Israel Stuxnet Attack | Threat Level | Wired.com.

The sophisticated espionage toolkit known as Flame is directly tied to the Stuxnet superworm that attacked Iran’s centrifuges in 2009 and 2010, according to researchers who recently found that the main module in Flame contains code that is nearly identical to a module that was used in an early version of Stuxnet.

Researchers at Russia-based Kaspersky Lab discovered that a part of the module that allows Flame to spread via USB sticks using the autorun function on a Windows machine contains the same code that was used in a version of Stuxnet that was unleashed on computers in Iran in 2009, reportedly in a joint operation between the U.S. and Israel. The module, which was known as Resource 207 in Stuxnet, was removed from subsequent versions of Stuxnet, but it served as a platform for what would later develop into the full-fledged Flame malware that is known today.

The researchers believe the attackers may have used the Flame module to kickstart their Stuxnet project before taking both pieces of malware into different and separate directions. They’ve detailed the similarities between the modules in Flame and Stuxnet in blog post.

“This could be in my opinion, together with the MD5 collision attack, maybe the biggest discoveries to date about Flame,” said  Roel Schouwenberg, senior antivirus researcher at Kaspersky Lab. The MD5 collision attack refers to a discovery last week that Flame used a previously unknown variant of a collision attack in its efforts to sign a malicious file with a fraudulent digital certificate to trick victim machines into thinking the file was legitimate and trusted code from Microsoft.

In the version of the Flame module that was found in Stuxnet, the researchers also discovered a privilege escalation exploit that had previously been overlooked when Stuxnet was carefully examined after its discovery in 2010

The exploit was a zero-day exploit when the attackers first created it in February 2009. But Microsoft patched the Windows kernel vulnerability it exploited four months later — on June 9, 2009 — before the attackers are believed to have launched Stuxnet for the first time on June 22.

The exploit  would have allowed the attackers to gain elevated privileges on a machine, if the user account did not have administrative privileges, in order to run their malicious code on it. But both this exploit and the autorun exploit were later removed in subsequent versions of Stuxnet that were released in 2010. The autorun exploit was replaced with the .lnk exploit that made Stuxnet famous, and the now-spoiled privilege escalation exploit was replaced with two other zero-day privilege exploits that Microsoft learned about, and patched, only in 2010 after Stuxnet was exposed.

The module containing these exploits was only discovered in Stuxnet now because it only appeared in the 2009 version of Stuxnet, and most researchers until now have focused their attention only on the 2010 version Stuxnet, since this was the version that spread widely and was considered more interesting because it contained four zero-day exploits.

Flame was discovered by Kaspersky Lab in early May. The malware, which had been targeting systems primarily in the Middle East, had been active for at least two years. Researchers uncovered numerous plug-in modules for the malware that can be used for stealing documents, reading written communications on a computer or recording conversations that occur over Skype or in the vicinity of a targeted computer.

It was previously reported that Flame had the ability to spread by infecting USB sticks using the autorun and .lnk vulnerabilities that Stuxnet used. It also used the same print spooler vulnerability that Stuxnet used to spread to computers on a local network. But it wasn’t clear if the teams that created Flame and Stuxnet had simply had access to a common repository of exploits or if they had in fact worked  in cooperation on their codes.

The fact that the module in the early Stuxnet version is nearly identical to the code in Flame suggests that the separate teams that created Flame and Stuxnet shared source code for the autorun exploit, rather than just binary code, implying that they may have worked more closely than previously believed.

“It obviously shows that these teams were somewhat tight, so to say. They were actually comfortable giving the source code to someone else,” Schouwenberg said.

Researchers believed until now that Flame was likely part of a parallel project created by contractors who were hired by the same nation-state team that was behind Stuxnet and its sister malware, DuQu, but that Flame was developed separately from Stuxnet and was used for different purposes. Now researchers believe that Stuxnet’s creators used part of Flame in the early stage of developing Stuxnet – perhaps because they were under pressure to get Stuxnet launched – but then developed Stuxnet separately from Flame thereafter.

They say that Flame was likely created as early as the summer of 2008 and was already a mature platform by the time the coders behind Stuxnet created their malware sometime between January and June 2009. Once the Flame module was removed from Stuxnet, both pieces of malware likely continued to be developed separately by the different teams.

“There was some initial cooperation clearly, and then this cooperation stopped,” Schouwenberg said.

The team that worked on Stuxnet built their malware into a cyberweapon for conducting sabotage, while the Flame team took the module that appeared in Stuxnet and built that out to become the massive espionage tool that Kaspersky discovered last month.

The researchers say that more discoveries are yet to be made, as they continue to find more files that may be new modules for Flame.

“Right now in my inbox I have 216 files that all seem to be Flame plug-ins,” said Schouwenberg. “I’m sure that a lot of them are probably duplicates. But nevertheless, there is a lot of new stuff that we need to analyze.”

With New Cameras, IAF Could Peek into the Ground

June 11, 2012

With New Cameras, IAF Could Peek into the Ground – Defense/Security – News – Israel National News.

Hyperspectral camera could allow UAVs to detect hidden weapons and chemical agents.
AAFont Size

By Gil Ronen

First Publish: 6/11/2012, 11:59 AM

 

IAF UAVs

IAF UAVs
Israel news photo: Flash 90

The Israel Air Force is currently examining hyper-spectral camera technology, which could allow unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to collect a wide variety of information, some invisible to the human eye, the IAF Website writes. Among other things, the camera could identify hidden weapons and underground bunkers camouflaged with vegetation.

“The camera will alert its operator regarding the location of suspicious targets and even of spots that are saturated with chemicals and other substances,” Lt. Col. Yoav, chief of the Intelligence Department of the IAF’s Equipment Squadron, told the website.

“Its mode of operation is based on sensing the wavelengths invisible to the human eye that are emitted by different substances in nature. Every natural substance emits waves at lengths that are unique to it, and the camera can tell the difference between them because of its high sensitivity,” he added.

If, for instance, a bush appears to emit abnormal wavelengths – it could be a sign that something is hidden beneath it.

Airborne hyper-spectral cameras already have civilian uses, and serve to identify pests in fields, environmental damage and air pollution.

Experiments are currently underway in order to examine if the system is suitable for use by the IAF. If approved, the cameras will be integrated into the UAV squadrons, following an extensive training process that will be conducted by professional engineers.

‘If he could, Assad would do to us what he’s doing to his own people’

June 11, 2012

Israel Hayom | ‘If he could, Assad would do to us what he’s doing to his own people’.

IDF Deputy Chief of General Staff Maj. Gen. Yair Naveh warns Syrian missiles “can reach any point in Israel and therefore we must remain vigilant” • Syria is believed to possess the world’s largest stockpile of chemical weapons, including some of the deadliest chemical agents known, such as sarin and the nerve agent VX. Their chemical agents have already been integrated in warheads mounted on advanced Scud missiles.

Israel Hayom Staff, Eli Leon and News Agencies
IDF Deputy Chief of General Staff Maj. Gen. Yair Naveh says Syria has chemical weapons that can reach any point in Israel.

|

Photo credit: IDF Spokesperson’s Unit

<< 1 2 >>

‘Hezbollah could get Syria’s non-conventional arms’

June 11, 2012

‘Hezbollah could get Syria’s non-conventional … JPost – Defense.

By JPOST.COM STAFF, REUTERS
06/11/2012 15:49
Barak says Assad family is “slaughtering its people with the support of Iran, Hezbollah,” Israel closely monitoring situation.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak Photo: Marc Israel Sellem

Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Monday said Israel is closely watching developments in Syria due to the possibility of Damascus transferring advanced and non-conventional weapons to Hezbollah should Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime fall.

“The moment the regime there falls, we’ll be following these things, but at the end of the day it is very difficult to predict what will happen there,” Barak told a group of youths performing national service.

One does not need intelligence reports or analyses to see what is going on in Syria, Barak continued, “it is enough to watch television.”

“The Assad family is slaughtering its people, with the support of the Iranians and Hezbollah and the world is silent,” the defense minister added.

Shelling of opposition strongholds continues

Syrian forces shelled opposition strongholds in the central province of Homs and eastern Deir al-Zor on Monday and clashed with rebels in violence which killed 29 people across the country, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

The British-based Observatory, which monitors Syria through a network of sources inside the country, said six members of the security forces were killed in fighting with rebels in the town of Al-Ashaara in Deir al-Zor.
Video shows what activists say are helicopters firing missiles in Rastan.

A further five people, including an army defector, were killed in army shelling of the town, it said.

In the center of the country, where Free Syrian Army rebels have been intensifying attacks on forces loyal to Assad, the army shelled Rastan and the city of Homs and conducted army offensives in Hama and Idlib provinces.

On Sunday, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu condemned the ongoing massacre of Syrian civilians by Assad, blaming the violence on the Axis of Evil: Iran, Syria and Hezbollah.

“This axis is rearing its ugly head,” Netanyahu told his cabinet, “and the world must understand that this is the region we live in.”

Vice Premier Shaul Mofaz on Sunday accused Assad of committing genocide during his crackdown on a 15-month uprising, in an unusually harsh censure of the Jewish state’s Arab neighbor.

Soldiers and militias loyal to Assad have killed at least 10,000 people, according to UN figures. The Assad government puts its own losses at more than 2,600 dead. Assad has blamed unspecified foreign-backed terrorists for the violence.

Syrian Army Unable to Stop Flood of Deserters – SPIEGEL ONLINE

June 11, 2012

Syrian Army Unable to Stop Flood of Deserters – SPIEGEL ONLINE.

Members of the Free Syrian ArmyZoom

Vedat Xhymshiti / DER SPIEGEL

Members of the Free Syrian Army

The Syrian regime’s troops are still able to attack insurgents almost anywhere and at any time, but they can no longer control the whole country, as the number of army defectors continues to grow. But the rebels dread the next stage of the conflict, when they expect President Assad to order his air force to attack.

There are various versions of Syria’s current most popular joke, but usually it goes something like this: The army stops an intercity bus at a checkpoint. All the passengers show their identification papers, except for one man, who lounges in the last row of seats, making no move to comply. The soldiers ask again, growing visibly hostile, until the man snarls: “You’ll pay for this! I’m with the intelligence service!”

 

The checkpoint inspectors look at each other and start to grin. They inform the man: “We’re actually with the Free Syrian Army” — the armed wing of the rebellion.Syrians have a strong sense for finding the punch line in the horrors they’ve experienced, even at times that call to mind the bloodiest days of the conflicts that took place in neighboring Lebanon and Iraq. Reports say more than 180 people were slaughtered in massacres over the last few days, many of them women and children. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon stated last week that “the danger of a civil war is imminent and real” in Syria. But this has been a country at war for some time already.

Yet the cynical joke about the soldiers at the checkpoint reflects a reality that grows closer with each day, one which is welcomed by many Syrians: The regime is finding its soldiers slipping out of its grasp. One noncommissioned officer from the northwestern Syrian city of Idlib, just hours after defecting to the Free Syrian Army (FSA), relates breathlessly how he made his escape: “The officer was sitting there, and when he was alone with me and a friend of mine, he demanded, ‘What are you still doing here? Go on and get out of here!’ The officer will issue the order to shoot them, the defector says, and he’ll call their families and threaten them, but all that is nothing but show. It’s over, he says, and it was time for them to disappear.

Shooting from a Distance

Of 400 soldiers originally stationed in the provincial capital of Idlib, just a couple dozen remained last week defending their base near the center of the city, which has seen significant fighting. In the small city of Maraa, near Aleppo, 15 soldiers defected within the space of a week — as many as in the entire previous year.

In Azaz, where Assad’s troops still control a checkpoint at the edge of the city, a heavily fortified city neighborhood and the minarets of the largest mosque, two soldiers defected a few days ago under the cover of a fake attack. They reported they had received hardly any supplies in weeks, and that they were living on dried out bread and brackish water. One earlier defector had taken with him the numbers of everyone in his unit who owned a cell phone. The FSA then contacted each of them, offering to help them escape. Many of the soldiers found it an attractive offer.

This is just one small insight into the situation in northern Syria, but deserters from other parts of the country who have managed to make their way back to their native villages near Aleppo tell of similar conditions in their own units. Reports of the types of attacks carried out by Assad’s troops also suggest the situation in the south, in the area around Damascus, in Deir al-Zor in the east and in Homs in the west is much the same as it is in the north: In many cases, the army no longer deploys its troops, but instead shoots from great distances using tanks and heavy artillery, or from helicopters, strategies which decrease the risk to the army.

One defector from Homs, a city that has also been the site of heavy fighting, describes a cycle of accelerating collapse. “If I’d left sooner, state security would have arrested my family and burned down my house,” he says. “But they’re not going to come now, certainly not just because of me.”

Diminishing Fear

With each bit of the country that slips from the regime’s control, the soldiers’ fear diminishes. That in turn increases the number of defectors, more and more of whom join the FSA. One officer, who defected to the FSA and has a precise mind for figures, estimates the group has around 40,000 former army soldiers in its ranks, although the proportion of soldiers and civilians varies among regions.

Outwardly, power dynamics in Syria have changed little in the past 15 months. The rebellion has gripped the cities, but unlike in Libya, here there is no still no large, contiguous region for the rebels to defend. But the appearance of stability is deceptive. While it’s true that soldiers are no longer allowed to travel by intercity bus without a permit, and that many of those who escape still risk being shot by the omnipresent intelligence service, the fact remains that the regime is no longer able to stay the gradual erosion of its army.

The impression of power and control emanating from the centers of Damascus, Aleppo and other major cities may also be deceptive. The Western half of Syria is a land of villages and small cities, which have joined together with the insurgency in the most densely populated provinces. Rif, the area around Aleppo, Idlib, Homs, Hama and Daraa together form a zone in which the government’s troops may attack anywhere, at any time, yet are no longer able to control the area permanently. And in many places, the people living here have switched sides. Sunni Muslims have certainly done so, but so have most Druzes and Ismailis. And though Kurdish villages in the northwest, such as Basuta and Ain Dara, have started flying the Kurdish flag in recent weeks, rather than the revolutionary flag with its three stars, there’s no one left here who still defends the regime.

Around 50 soldiers are stationed on Sheikh Barakat Mountain near the Church of St. Simeon, northern Syria’s famous late antiquity ruin, but for the past two months they’ve received supplies only by air, because convoys are no longer able to pass through the surrounding area, which is completely under the FSA’s control.

‘We Don’t Get Orders’

The FSA itself is a peculiar entity. It’s clear that it’s effectively organized at the village level and in small cities, each group loosely connected with other districts and provinces, but without a set hierarchy or command structure. “We have a good relationship with the FSA’s commander in exile in Turkey,” says one local commander, “but we don’t get orders. We’re in charge of ourselves.”

This set-up isn’t enough to allow coordinated attacks on the regime’s centers of power, but it appears to be good enough to control the rest of the country. What’s sustaining the regime is its monopoly on heavy weaponry, as well as its tough core of 100,000 to 200,000 officers, secret police, elite soldiers and militia members, most of whom are Alawis and fear that the regime’s fall would spell their own end as well. These troops have their stronghold in the Ansariyah Mountains in the west of the country and control parts of the larger cities as well, but they no longer hold all the land between.

Everyone — the rebels, the hundreds of thousands of undecided currently fleeing through the country to wherever they feel they will be somewhat safer, even those who support the regime — are all dreading the “next step,” in the words of Abu Ali al-Dirri, an officer who changed sides six months ago. The next step is the air force.

‘They’re Going to Bomb the Country’

Syria has made massive improvements to its air force in the past year, but so far, aside from the helicopters, hardly put it into action. “But before the Assads go down, they’re going to bomb the country,” Dirri believes. For years, he says, the regime has made a point of ensuring the loyalty of the air force, the branch of the military where President Bashar Assad’s father Hafez began his career. “They’ve increased the proportion of Alawi cadets at the military academy in Aleppo constantly, especially in the air force,” he says. “They knew things would turn against them at some point.”

At most, Dirri says, the regime would face the problem that many older pilots have been discharged in recent years, while many newer pilots have only barely completed the number of flying hours necessary in order to fly a fighter jet. Dirri himself, as a Sunni, hasn’t even been allowed to carry a gun since the revolution began.

For years, the officer says, “Russia didn’t want to supply replacement parts any more, because we never paid, but now Russia is providing enormous amounts of assistance, even sending over personnel.” He adds that more than 1,000 Russian engineers were present in the country this January. Many of them were officially there as agricultural consultants, “but their work doesn’t have much to do with agriculture.” Iran has sent arms and ammunition, he adds, but not much in the way of personnel, while China has a group of air force specialists stationed at Aleppo’s military airports.

Around half of the air force’s 360 fighter jets are fully operational, Dirri says. It’s roughly the same proportion with its 120 helicopters. Its French “Gazelle” helicopters, equipped with armor-piercing weapons, are in the best condition, “but not a single one of them has ever taken off — they’re all stationed at the presidential palace airport.”

Where Will the West Draw a Line?

 

As long as the West continues to declare every few days that it has no intention of carrying out a military intervention, says Colonel Dirri, the regime in Syria will continue to use everything at its disposal. “Its strength rests in the fact that the whole world is saying, ‘We’re not going to get involved,'” he says. “If this Rasmussen” — a reference to NATO’s secretary general — “would just shut his mouth for once, that alone would do Syria a great service!”At the very latest, after the massacres in Houla two weeks ago and in Mazraat al-Qubair last Wednesday, none of the rebels in northern Syrian still believe the UN’s peace plan will be successful. Instead, their greatest hope is little more than a rumor: that at some point the US must surely draw a line, and perhaps Russia too. What will it take to reach that line? The deployment of Syria’s air force to carpet-bomb the country? Or perhaps the regime resorting to its arsenal of chemical weapons?

One thing is clear: With or without a vote from the UN Security Council, the rebels want an intervention.

Translated from the German by Ella Ornstein

Iran: The Deathly Hollows

June 11, 2012

Iran: The Deathly Hollows.

June 11, 2012: Iran continues to defy the increasingly restrictive international economic sanctions placed on it. The sanctions have prevented Iran from getting some specialized or particularly large equipment, which has made it impossible to keep its oil production facilities up-to-date. But for most gear, the sanctions just increase the price, and time required to obtain items. But as the sanctions keep piling on, especially those that limit access to the international banking system, the economic damage becomes more severe.

Despite most of its major customers cutting oil orders 50 percent or more, other oil producers (especially Saudi Arabia and Russia) have been able to make up the slack and keep oil prices down. This means Iran sells less oil, and has to offer discounts from already low prices. If this keeps up, Iran will be suffering severe cash shortages by the end of the year.

In a long term effort to find other ways to sell its oil, the government has made arrangements to export electricity to Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All three nations have power shortages, and Iran can use oil it cannot export to produce more electricity. But exports to Syria and Lebanon are dependent on Syria suppressing the year-long uprising against the pro-Iranian dictatorship. Iran has been helping the Assad family, which has controlled Syria since the 1960s, but this aid (armed advisors, weapons, equipment and suggestions on how to suppress unrest) has not, so far, managed to put down the rebellion. Iran is determined to keep its ally Syria loyal, but that is proving difficult as most Syrians are Sunni Arabs and are very angry at their Shia rulers and non-Arab Iran.

In addition to sanctions, Iran now finds itself under widespread attack by major Cyber War weapons. The latest one is Flame, and it apparently grabbed large quantities of secrets in Iran, and is apparently still at work. In response to this, last year Iran established a special military unit (containing a lot of civilian experts) to defend the country against Cyber War attacks. At the same time the Iranians are combing the world seeking skilled, and mercenary, hackers willing to work for them. Iran sees the Cyber War threat from the U.S. and Israel as extremely serious, and is recruiting as many hired guns as they can. This is risky, as most of these guys will not be working in Iran, and this makes it possible for American or Israeli agents to infiltrate this mercenary Cyber War militia. This could all get very interesting.

Before Flame there was Stuxnet, Duqu and several other Internet based weapons unleashed on Iran in the last few years. These are only the ones Iran knows about. It gets worse, as the U.S. and Israel have admitted they are behind this Cyber War effort, the first such operation to be undertaken. These programs are true Cyber War weapons, not the much simpler and less capable stuff criminal hackers use to plunder or take over PCs.

Iran is now accused to smuggling weapons to Syria using passenger planes. All of Syria’s neighbors have banned Iranian arms shipments, via ground or air, to Syria. Iran denied the accusations and no one has blocked Iranian passenger aircraft from passing through. Shipments by sea are subject to interception by NATO warships, and this has already intercepted several arms smuggling efforts.

One area where Iran has been very helpful to Syria is in offering practical ways to get around sanctions. Iran has been dealing with sanctions for decades; Syria has not, so Iran has lots of useful tips and connections to help Syria cope with barriers to importing whatever it wants.

This assistance to the Syrian dictatorship has further poisoned Iranian relations with the Arab world by adding yet another dispute. Aside from the ancient theological disputes (which have Shia and Sunni Moslems calling each other heretics), there are some more practical items. For example, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) persists in disputing possession of three islands (Greater Tunb, Lesser Tunb and Abu Musa) in the Persian Gulf, which Iran seized by force in 1971, and refuses to give back. Iran ignores the fact that Arabs live on the islands and would rather be ruled by Arabs. A few percent of Iranians are Arabs and they are not treated well. This annoys Arabs in general, but also makes it clear that Iran does not fear Arabs and continues to strive for domination of the Moslem world. This, most Arabs see as blasphemous because Iran is run by Shia, a Moslem sect considered heretical by many Sunni clerics. Some 80 percent of Moslems are Sunni, and the Arabs running Saudi Arabia are extremely Sunni. Thus by making some provocative statements about the disputed islands, a media storm is generated in the Arab world, blocking out discussion of anything else Iran is doing, for a while anyway. 

Many Iranian clericals have long talked, quite openly about how Iran should be running the Islamic holy places, not Saudi Arabia. This sort of talk does not go down well with the Saudis, who see an Iranian government conspiracy to cause trouble during the Haj (the pilgrimage to Mecca), to make the Saudis look bad.

Arabs do not trust and, more importantly, are afraid of Iran. The number of disputes between Iran and the Arab world has been increasing, which accounts for the huge increase in Arab Gulf states arms purchases, secret cooperation with Israel and closer military ties with the United States and the West in general. Although Arabs consider Iran scary, they do not see the Iranians as invincible. Three decades of religious dictatorship has weakened Iran economically and militarily. Iran has always been hostile towards its Arab neighbors, but current Iranian threats are seen as hollow, although not entirely harmless. The threat would become far more credible if Iran had nuclear weapons. The Iranians have had their way with the Arabs for thousands of years; in only a few instances have the Arabs gained the upper hand. Thus wise Arab leaders deal with Iran very carefully.

An example of Iranian effectiveness can be seen in their relationships with Iraq and Afghanistan. Before September 11, 2001, both nations were run by governments very hostile to Iran. Iraq, then ruled by Saddam Hussein, had invaded Iran in 1980 and that war ended in a bloody draw eight years later. The hatred and hostility remained. Afghanistan was controlled by Sunni fanatics (the Taliban) who were murdering thousands of Shia Afghans and allowing the export of opium and heroin to Iran.  By 2003 the U.S. had deposed the Taliban and Saddam, allowing Iran to develop friendlier relations with Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran used bribery, trade deals and economic investment, plus its spies and rabble rousers (the terrorist friendly Quds Force) to heavily influence how Iraq and Afghanistan are run. This irritates the U.S., and many other neighboring states (especially the Arabs and Pakistan.) But this is how Iran has, for thousands of years, dominated its neighbors. Old habits, and skills, do not disappear easily.

Iran continues to stonewall UN (and world) efforts to halt the Iranian nuclear weapons program. Officially, Iran denies such a program exists. But inside Iran, and according to many foreign intelligence agencies, the program is real. The evidence keeps building.

Live video of Homs under heavy artillary fire….

June 11, 2012

homslive | Bambuser.

Syria’s scuds on alert | The Sunday Times

June 11, 2012

Syria’s scuds on alert | The Sunday Times.

Assad regime flexes its muscles as a warning to neighbours

Uzi Mahnaimi Published: 10 June 2012

Scud missiles can have a range of 440 miles and are able to carry chemical warheads (Bullit Marquez) Scud missiles can have a range of 440 miles and are able to carry chemical warheads

SYRIA’s Scud missile teams were placed on high alert this weekend and moved to a new base, according to western intelligence sources.

The North Korean-made ballistic missiles, under the control of technicians belonging to the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, were spotted by spy satellites at an airbase north of Aleppo.

It is believed that the Scud D missiles, which have a range of 440 miles and are able to carry chemical warheads, were moved from a depot at Al-Safir, south of Aleppo, to act as a warning to any foreign powers contemplating intervention to stop Syria’s bloodshed.

“It’s clear that the Syrians knew that moving the Scuds would be seen by Western satellites,” said a defence source.

The Free Syrian Army, the rebel force, are believed to have made several failed attempts in recent weeks to storm the Al-Safir depot, where the Scuds were stored.

It is not the first time the Assad regime has given a show of military strength to the international community.

In December last year, as the conflict became bloodier and international condemnation of the regime increased, the state news agency announced that the Syrian army had performed missile tests in eastern Syria.

Uzi Rubin, the founder of Israel’s missile defence programme, noted that Damascus had tested several types of missiles, including Scuds and advanced Russian Yakhont land-sea missiles.

He said: “This is the first time the Syrians have launched and made public almost every kind of missile in their arsenal.”

The Revolutionary Guard has been present in Syria since last year under a defence pact between the two countries. The Iranian missile experts arrived only recently.

The Scud D with its VX chemical warheads is regarded by Israeli experts as the “poor man’s response” to Israel’s formidable non-conventional arsenal.

The missile could reach Cairo, Jerusalem and Istanbul.