Archive for May 29, 2012

Iran Rules

May 29, 2012

Lebanon news – NOW Lebanon -Iran Rules.

No one on our team seems the least bit embarrassed, nor do any of the pundits who predicted that some sort of nuke deal would be agreed on.  Indeed, most of the coverage that I’ve seen has to do with Israel:  will they attack or not?

On the basis of my mother’s dictum that repetition is the basis of all learning, let’s go through the basic principles again:

· Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is not interested in a deal with the West unless it is clearly and unequivocally a total Western surrender that ends sanctions, confirms our retreat from the Middle East, and acknowledges Iran as the regional hegemon;

· The current game–call it “around the world in 180 days”–provides the diplomats with good food, luxurious accommodations, and pictures in the papers, and it leaves the Iranians free to enrich uranium, build missiles and warheads, and kill us and anyone inclined to work with us. That is the Real War and no Western leader ever talks about it;

· Sanctions will neither stop the Iranian nuclear program nor stop the Real War. Only a change in regime can accomplish that.  To that end, sanctions could be a positive force if they were combined with support for the Iranian opposition.  Just ask the Revolutionary Guards how serious the resistance is:  the RG just deployed an additional eight thousand soldiers—some in uniform, others in plain clothes–in the streets of Tehran.But no Western leader cares to help the Iranian opposition, even verbally.  When  those leaders say “no option is off the table,” they mean some day there might be a  military attack against Iran.  But  financial and tactical assistance to the Iranian people willing to actively fight for freedom is totally off any Western  strategic table;

Dr. Michael Ledeen is the Freedom Scholar at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

“Flame virus amateurish”

May 29, 2012

“Flame virus amateurish” – Globes.

GreenSQL CTO David Maman believes that the virus, which has raised a media buzz, was merely another standard attack.

29 May 12 17:23, Guy KatsovichShare

Contradicting assessments by foreign IT security experts, GreenSQLCTO and IT security expert David Maman believes that the Flame virus discovered in Iran and elsewhere was just another example of a fairly simple cyber weapon in the global cyber war.

“The media buzz about the tool is just buzz,” Maman told “Globes”. He believe that there is no reason to be surprised about the virus’s discovery. “It looks a little amateurish, like many other cyber weapons. It is fairly simple. There are dozens like it on the web. The same people and private companies can buy them and do what they want with them.”

In contrast to foreign IT security experts, Maman believes that the idea that a government or major defense agency created Flame is not based on the virus’s actual structure. “I really do not agree with the assessment by Kaspersky Lab. Such a cyber weapon can be developed by any other group, which could have used it for corporate, or even political, espionage, not necessarily for defense,” he says.

Kaspersky Lab says that the cyber weapon mostly attacked in Iran, the Palestinian Authority, and Israel.

Maman: “Kaspersky only reports what it sees. There could definitely be other versions of the cyber weapon directed at other target countries.”

Maman adds that the fact that Kaspersky discovered the cyber weapon should raises suspicions among international cyber experts. “How come no American antivirus company, whose research departments are many times more advanced than Kaspersky’s, did not discover these Trojan horses. Why did only Russian and Belorussian companies discover them?” he asks.

Published by Globes [online], Israel business news – www.globes-online.com – on May 29, 2012

Iran: Yaalon Confirmed Israel is behind Flame

May 29, 2012

Iran: Yaalon Confirmed Israel is behind Flame – Defense/Security – News – Israel National News.

Fars news agency cites Yaalon’s morning interview as proof Israel is responsible for the ingenious malware.
AAFont Size

By Gil Ronen

First Publish: 5/29/2012, 4:25 PM

 

Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Reuters

Semi-official Iranian news agency Fars seized upon statements by Israeli Vice Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon Tuesday as proof that Israel engineered an exceedingly sophisticated program dubbed Flame that has been spying on computers in Iran.

“The Vice Prime Minister of the Zionist regime admitted the role of the regime in creating the virus Flame for cyber espionage in the Middle East, and especially in Iran,” Fars stated. “Moshe Yaalon’s statements today are an additional confirmation of Israel’s role in developing the malicious program.”

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparsat also pointed a finger at Israel, although less directly: “Illegitimate regimes are producing viruses and trying to use cyberspace and this is not really effective,” he told reporters at a weekly press briefing.

Iran’s MAHER Center, the Iranian equivalent of the U.S.’s Computer Emergency Readiness Team (CERT) said Tuesday that Flame “has caused substantial damage” and that “massive amounts of data have been lost” due to its operation.

Annan warns Syria of grave concern, West expels envoys

May 29, 2012

Annan warns Syria of grave concern, West e… JPost – Middle East.

By REUTERS
05/29/2012 16:23
France, Britain, Germany, Spain, Italy, Australia, Canada toss top Syrian diplomats from their capitals in response to massacre of more than 100 people in Houla.

Assad meets Annan in Damascus Photo: REUTERS

BEIRUT – Peace envoy Kofi Annan expressed “grave concern” to Syria’s President Bashar Assad on Tuesday and Western nations threw out its envoys to protest against a massacre of 108 civilians, many of them children, in the town of Houla.

France, Britain, Canada, Germany, Italy, Spain and Australia said they were expelling the Syrian envoys from their capitals in a move that was coordinated with the United States and underlined Assad’s diplomatic isolation.

The killings in Houla drew a chorus of powerful condemnation from around the world, with the United Nations saying entire families had been shot dead in their homes.

“Bashar Assad is the murderer of his people,” French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius told Le Monde. “He must relinquish power. The sooner the better.” His Australian counterpart Bob Carr said: “This massacre of more than 100 men, women and children in Houla was a hideous and brutal crime.”

Assad’s government late on Monday denied having anything to do with the deaths, or even having heavy weapons in the area.

Western countries that have called for Assad to step down were hoping that the Houla killings would tip global opinion, notably that of Syria’s main protector Russia, towards more effective action against Damascus.

Annan drew up a peace plan backed by the United Nations and the Arab League to steer a way out of the 14-month-old uprising against Assad. But six weeks after it was agreed by Damascus and the rebels, the bloodshed has barely slowed.

Annan told Assad of the “grave concern of the international community about the violence in Syria, including in particular the recent events in Houla,” his spokesman Ahmad Fawzi said in a statement after two hours of talks in Damascus.

“He conveyed in frank terms his view to President Assad that the six-point plan cannot succeed without bold steps to stop the violence and release detainees, and stressed the importance of full implementation of the plan.”

Carr said Syria’s expelled charge d’affaires in Canberra was told to “convey a clear message to Damascus that Australians are appalled by this massacre and we will pursue a unified international response to hold those responsible to account.”

Germany Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle urged the UN Security Council to revisit the situation in Syria.

The UN human rights office in Geneva said fewer than 20 of the 108 dead in Houla were killed by artillery and tank fire – weaponry that lightly-armed rebels do not have in their arsenal.

Survivors told UN investigators that most of the others had been shot by pro-Assad shabbiha militia, who in the past have intimidated and assaulted hotbeds of opposition to Assad.

“Almost half of the ones we know of so far are children – that is totally unpardonable – and a very large number of women as well,” said spokesman Rupert Colville. “At this point, it looks like entire families were shot in their houses.”

The report contradicted an open letter sent by Syria to the UN Security Council on Monday saying: “Not a single tank entered the region and the Syrian army was in a state of self-defense …The terrorist armed groups … entered with the purpose of killing and the best proof of that is the killing by knives, which is the signature of terrorist groups who massacre according to the Islamist way.”

Gruesome video footage distributed by opposition activists has helped to shake world opinion out of growing indifference to a conflict in which more than 10,000 have been killed.

Iran’s Mehmanparast Says ‘Soft War’ Cyber Attacks to Fail – Businessweek

May 29, 2012

Iran’s Mehmanparast Says ‘Soft War’ Cyber Attacks to Fail – Businessweek.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry said cyber- attacks against the Islamic republic are launched by hostile governments as part of a broader “soft war” and will fail.

“Illegitimate regimes are producing viruses” and “trying to use the cyber space and this will not be really effective,” Ramin Mehmanparast, the ministry’s spokesman, told reporters in Tehran. He was commenting in response to a question about whether a newly detected virus, called Flame, had infected any Iranian computer systems. The Islamic republic has never recognized Israel as a legitimate state.

Iran, whose nuclear facilities and oil ministry have previously been the target of virus attacks, accuses the U.S. and Israel of trying to sabotage its technological progress. The U.S. and Israel say the country’s nuclear activities may have military intent, an allegation that Iran denies.

The Moscow-based information-technology security company Kaspersky Lab said on its website that the creators of Flame are seeking to collect information in some Middle Eastern countries including Iran, Lebanon, Syria and Israel and the Palestinian territories.

The software is a “highly sophisticated malicious program that is actively being used as a cyber-weapon” and can steal computer files, contact data and audio conversations, Kaspersky said. “Its complexity and functionality exceed those of all other cyber menaces known to date.”

‘Various Measures’

Israeli Vice Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon, asked about reports of a computer virus targeting Iranian computer systems, said it is “reasonable that whoever sees the Iranian threat as significant would use various measures, including this, in order to hurt it.”

Yaalon, a former army chief, also told Israel’s Army Radio today that “Israel is blessed as a country rich in advanced technology, and these tools open to us all sorts of possibilities.”

There are no sign of the virus in Palestinian computers and the situation is being monitoring, Sabri Sidem, an adviser on telecommunications to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, said in an interview.

Almost two years ago, malicious software known as Stuxnet impacted computer systems and several centrifuges used in Iran to enrich uranium, Iranian officials said at the time. Stuxnet may have been part of a campaign to disrupt Iranian nuclear installations, international computer-security researchers have said. In April, Iranian officials said they managed to contain a cyber-attack that targeted the country’s crude industry and caused computer systems at the Oil Ministry and other related state-owned businesses to crash.

To contact the reporter on this story: Ladane Nasseri in Dubai at lnasseri@bloomberg.net; Calev Ben-David in Jerusalem at cbendavid@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Andrew J. Barden at barden@bloomberg.net

Who is behind ‘masterpiece’ computer virus against Iran?

May 29, 2012

Israel Hayom | Who is behind ‘masterpiece’ computer virus against Iran?.

Strategic affairs minister says, “Israel has been blessed with elite technology, and these tools open up all sorts of options” • Experts believe a country, not individuals, behind virus that records conversations, monitors keystrokes and deletes files.

Ilan Gattegno and Israel Hayom Staff

 

Burning sensation. Kaspersky Lab says the “Flame” virus is one of the most malicious and complex viruses ever programmed. [Illustrative]

|

Photo credit: Ami Shooman

A nuclear gridlock

May 29, 2012

Israel Hayom | A nuclear gridlock.

Zalman Shoval

In her book “They came to Baghdad,” Agatha Christie tells of senior officials who convene in Baghdad for an important international summit (only to find their deaths). Christie teases her readers but finishes with a sort of happy end. In a rare coincidence, the representatives of the P5+1 (the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany) who came to Baghdad last week for nuclear talks with Iran also faced a string of unpleasant surprises (though their lives were not at risk). The Iranians teased their negotiation partners, but unlike the book, this was no surprise.

While the talks were underway, inspectors discovered traces of uranium enriched to 27 percent at Iran’s Fordo nuclear facility (while the West was talking to Iran about halting enrichment to 20% and removing all material enriched to 20% from Iran). It also emerged that Iran had doubled its amount of enriched uranium over the course of the last three months alone (from 73.7 kg to 145 kg [162 – 319 lbs]).

The Institute for Science and International Security, which describes itself as an independent institution dedicated to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, has concluded that Iran now has enough enriched uranium for the future production of five nuclear bombs.

At this point it is unclear whether the Iranian nuclear story will have a happy ending — will the sanctions and diplomacy, the West’s preferred route, prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon? In Baghdad, as in the previous round of talks in Istanbul, the Iranians adhered to a transparent tactic: driving a wedge between the other party’s delegates and cementing the concept of reciprocity. In other words, for every concession they would make, the West would roll back some of the sanctions.

The representatives of the West did not back down. It now appears that Tehran is worried above all else about a possible Israeli, or perhaps American, military attack, as the November U.S. presidential elections loom. Therefore, decision makers in Iran are engaged in a heated debate over what the best course of action would be to avert a military attack: more evasive and deceptive tactics or turning up the threats, including threats of terror attacks against Israel and the U.S.’s Arab allies, such as Saudi Arabia and the oil-rich emirates.

For its part, the Obama administration has decided not to confront the dilemmas surrounding a military strike, whether it is led by Israel or the U.S. As the president’s National Security Adviser Tom Donilon said, the administration believes it shares Israel’s objective of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. But the question remains, according to Donilon, whether a military strike would be the most effective way to achieve this objective.

Washington appears to be sincere when it declares it will not tolerate a nuclear Iran. To underscore the fact that the U.S. stance did not differ from Jerusalem’s, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dispatched her deputy, Undersecretary for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman (who also served as the head of the U.S. delegation to the Baghdad talks), to Israel over the weekend.

But the U.S.’s strategy has elicited increasing criticism. Jamie Fly, a former top official in the National Security Council under President George W. Bush and Matthew Kroenig, who until recently served as a special adviser to the Obama administration — both experts on foreign policy and national security — recently penned a Washington Post op-ed in which they argued, “There is little reason to believe that Iran is serious about doing anything other than using the coming weeks [during the talks] to enrich more uranium and make progress toward a nuclear weapon.” They believe the U.S. must clearly lay out its demands and specify what failure to comply would entail.

That same week, Reuel Marc Gerecht, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, and Mark Dubowitz, an executive director of the foundation and head of its Iran Energy Project, argued that while the sanctions may have brought Iran to the negotiating table, it would be a mistake to conclude that the West should reward Tehran.

“Given how advanced Iran’s nuclear program is, the West’s approach seems wildly underwhelming,” they write. “As the tactician Anthony Cordesman recently noted, ‘The threat Iran’s nuclear efforts pose [is] not simply a matter of its present ability to enrich uranium to 20 percent … [The regime] can pursue nuclear weapons development through a range of compartmented and easily concealable programs without a formal weapons program, and even if it suspends enrichment activity.”

The next chapter will begin three weeks from now in Moscow. The happy ending still seems far off, especially considering Iran’s increasing confidence that the gun the West is reluctantly pointing at it has no bullets.

Some in West seeking to stretch out Iran talks, Ya’alon accuses

May 29, 2012

Israel Hayom | Some in West seeking to stretch out Iran talks, Ya’alon accuses.

Vice Prime Minister Moshe (Bogie) Ya’alon says nuclear talks have only produced “more Iranian time-buying” • In January, he accused U.S. President Barack Obama of diluting anti-Iran sanctions for fear of spiking fuel prices that would sap re-election bid.

Reuters

 

Talks have only produced “more Iranian time-buying,” says Vice Prime Minister Moshe (Bogie) Ya’alon.

|

Photo credit: Dudu Grunshpan

International nuclear talks with Iran have achieved nothing, a senior official said on Tuesday, suggesting that some Western nations were happy to see the negotiations drag on.

Israel, which has threatened to go to war to prevent its arch-foe from going nuclear, has fretted on the sidelines as six world powers press for a curb on Iranian uranium enrichment.

Breaking Israel’s official silence on the second round of talks, held in Baghdad last week, Vice Prime Minister Moshe (Bogie) Ya’alon said the talks had only produced “more Iranian time-buying”.

“(There was) no significant achievement except for the Iranians having been given another three weeks or so to pursue the nuclear project until the next meeting in Moscow,” he told Army Radio in an interview. “To my regret, I don’t see any sense of urgency, and perhaps it is even in the interest of some players in the West to stretch out the time, which would certainly square with the Iranian interest.”

Ya’alon, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s rightist Likud party, would not elaborate. In January, he accused U.S. President Barack Obama of diluting anti-Iran sanctions for fear of a spike in fuel prices that would sap his bid to win another White House term in November.

Like Israel, Washington says armed force could be a last option against the Iranians, who deny seeking the bomb and have vowed to fight back on several fronts if attacked.

Reluctant to see a new war in the Muslim world, the Obama administration has sought to reassure the Netanyahu government that discussions have not yet been exhausted.

“Netanyahu’s concern that time is running out is justified,” a senior U.S. official told reporters in Israel on Friday. “We are doubtful about whether it is possible to reach an agreement with Iran, but we have to keep trying the diplomatic path because the alternatives, if it’s a nuclear Iran or regional war, are very serious.”

The Baghdad meeting focused on foreign efforts to roll back Iran’s enrichment of uranium to 20 percent fissile purity, a level approaching bomb grade. Israel wants an immediate curb on lower-level Iranian enrichment as well.

“Even when faced with lesser demands, the Iranians have yet to respond positively,” Ya’alon said. Sanctions should be toughened, he said, but “we have not even reached that stage in the talks. Instead, we roll the matter from meeting to meeting”.

Asked if the June 18-19 Moscow talks might prove conclusive, Ya’alon said: “Let’s hope … The Iranians are working to buy time, to hoodwink the Western world and to continue spinning (uranium) centrifuges toward a military capability.”

Though Israel is reputed to have the region’s only atomic arsenal, many international experts, including the top U.S. military officer, Gen. Martin Dempsey, have voiced doubt in the ability of its conventional forces to deliver lasting damage to Iran’s dispersed and well-defended nuclear facilities.

That has given rise to speculation that Israel is involved in a recent rash of anti-Iran sabotage, including cyber-warfare.

A new computer virus, dubbed Flame, emerged on Monday, with analysts saying it may have been built on behalf of the same nation that commissioned the unclaimed Stuxnet worm that struck Iran’s nuclear program in 2010.

Asked if such assessments were sound, Ya’alon, a former Israeli spymaster and military chief, said: “Apparently.”

“I reckon it is certainly reasonable that everyone who sees in the Iranian threat a significant threat — and that is not just Israel, but all of the Western world, led by the United States — is resorting to all means available, including these, in order to harm the Iranian nuclear project,” he said

West should topple Assad – Israel Opinion, Ynetnews

May 29, 2012

West should topple Assad – Israel Opinion, Ynetnews.

Op-ed: There is no excuse for world’s ongoing inaction in the face of Syrian president’s murderousness

Yakir Elkariv

Published: 05.29.12, 10:59 / Israel Opinion

Just like his father before him, Assad Junior is a cold-blooded murderer who will do anything to stay in power. As the leader of a minority, he will do everything to maintain his hold on Syria – apparently based on the knowledge of what his fate and his family’s fate would be the moment they fall into the hands of the masses.

We must grimly admit that thus far, his strategy of firing in all directions and accusing the world of staging a conspiracy against him has proven itself. Neither Arab League condemnations nor Security Council threats have undermined his regime. At times it seems that the horrific images coming out of Syria almost daily have become part of the news routine.

he West must intervene in order to save the Syrian people from the nightmare they are caught up in. However, in Assad’s case one must be very cautious about creating a situation whereby the Syrian leader decides to bring down his foes as he goes down himself.

After all, the Alawite regime is armed to the teeth, among other things with long-range missiles that can hit Israel too. The danger is that the moment Assad realizes that he has no other way out he may fire them in order to stir a global commotion and disrupt the world’s plans.

Hardest nut to crack

The West should not delude itself: No operation, as successful as it may be, would be surgical. Assad’s removal would likely draw the whole of Syria into a terrible bloodbath and many innocents will be paying with their lives. However, his survival in power is already a stain on the West’s face, headed by the United States.

Nobody has any expectations from Putin. Yet does the whole world, and the honorable US president, have to remain paralyzed in the face of the ongoing horror until the Russian bear wakes up from its moralistic winter slumber and agrees to cooperate?

One must not think that one way or another, Assad will fall – as part of the energies unleashed by the “Arab Spring.” Should the world not topple him, he will not fall, and at the end of that day may even get to hand over power to his son.

Compared to the leaders toppled in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and Yemen, by now it’s already clear that Assad is the hardest nut to crack. Hence, removing him is the most urgent mission.

‘Flame virus aims to gather intelligence’

May 29, 2012

‘Flame virus aims to gather intelligence’ – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Tehran admits being targeted by what could be most sophisticated malware yet; says ‘massive amounts of data lost.’ Computer experts say such complex virus takes national resources to develop

Dudi Cohen, Yoav Zitun

Latest Update: 05.29.12, 10:33 / Israel News

Iranian authorities have admitted that malicious software dubbed Flame has attacked it, and instructed to run an urgent inspection of all computer systems in the country.

Iran’s MAHER Center said Tuesday that the Flame virus “has caused substantial damage” and that “massive amounts of data have been lost.”

The center, which is part of Iran’s Communication’s Ministry said that the virus’ level of complexity, accuracy and high-functionality – noted mostly by the information corrupted – indicated that there is a “relation” to the Stuxnet virus.

Iranian experts said that Flame was able to overcome 43 different anti-virus programs.

Flame-infected data (Photo: Kaspersky Lab)

While no one knows who is behind “the most sophisticated virus of all times,” the bottom line, computer experts say, is that only a state could have developed such a complex virus.

  • For more on the raging cyber war click hereFlame can gather data files, remotely change settings on computers, turn on PC microphones to record conversations, take screen shots and log instant messaging chats.Moscow-based Kaspersky Lab, one of the world’s largest data protection companies, was the first to discover the new malware. However, researchers are still unsure about its scope, because it has about 100 times as much code as a typical virus designed to steal financial information.

    Iran hit the hardest

    Researchers at Kaspersky estimated that around 5,000 personal computers around the world have been infected by the virus, Iran being hit the hardest, with 189 infected computers, followed by Israel and the Palestinian territories (98 computers), Sudan (32), Syria (30),Lebanon (18), Saudi Arabia (10) and Egypt (5).

    The researchers further estimated that the virus was developed by a country that allocated a significant budget for its development, which might be linked to cyber warfare.

    “Unlike the Suxtent virus that attacked in Iran, this is a spyware that doesn’t disrupt or terminate systems, Professor Yitzhak Ben Yisrael, the former head of the Administration for the Development of Weapons and the Technological Industry said.

    According to Ben Yisrael, while the source of the software is unknown, “its aim is clear – collecting intelligence.” The professor added that the spyware acts like a worm, jumping from one computer to another, and that it is impossible to locate the destination of the data that was copied.

    Another expert noted that the virus was extremely invasive, and was not created by a bored teenager, but rather by a sophisticated programmer.

    Flame could be the third major cyber weapon uncovered after the Stuxnet virus that attacked Iran’s nuclear program in 2010, and its data-stealing cousin Duqu, named after the Star Wars villain.

    Both Flame and Stuxnet appear to infect machines by exploiting the same flaw in the Windows operating system and employ a similar way of spreading.

    That means the teams that built Stuxnet and Duqu might have had access to the same technology as the team that built Flame.