‘Iran may activate US Hezbollah cells af… JPost – International.
By REUTERS/Jim Bourg
WASHINGTON – A congressional report finds that Hezbollah fundraising cells are rampant across the United States and that the Lebanese organization could activate these cells to carry out lethal terrorist attacks.
The report, compiled under the aegis of the US House Committee on Homeland Security, estimates that there are several thousand sympathetic Hezbollah donors in the country, with operatives probably in the hundreds.
Hezbollah is an Iranian proxy, and should Iran want to carry out terrorism in the US, it could then do so through these operatives. Though many in the US intelligence community assumed after September 11 that Tehran would only use Hezbollah for attacks inside America should the US or Israel strike Iran’s nuclear sites, that thinking changed following the alleged Iranian plot to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s ambassador in Washington.
“It is no longer clear that Iran sees carrying out an attack in the United States as crossing some sort of red line,” according to Matthew Levitt, director of the Stein Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. He testified before the committee Wednesday at a hearing on the threat that Iran and Hezbollah pose to America.
“Hezbollah has long had a substantial base of supporters in North America,” he noted in his prepared testimony. “This includes some operatives with military and operational training and a much larger pool of sympathizers and supporters who provide funding and some logistical support to the group but could be called upon to support operational activity should the group decide to carry out an attack here.”
Levitt calculated that such a decision became more likely if the organization perceived that the US was directly targeting or seeking to undermine the group.
And he concluded that “the odds are very strong that in the event of an attack on Iran’s nuclear program, Hezbollah would retaliate.”
In addition to the possibility that it would launch rockets at Israel, he assessed “its worldwide networks would almost certainly be called upon to execute the kind of asymmetric terror attacks that can be carried out with reasonable deniability and therefore make a targeted response more difficult.”
Committee chairman Peter King (R-New York), however, said that the heightened threat of retaliation on the American homeland even from an Israeli attack doesn’t mean the military option should be taken off the table.
“I don’t think we can rule out an Israeli attack,” King told CNN ahead of the hearing. “I think we have to keep all the pressure out there.”
He continued, “The fact that there can be complications is not a reason why Israel shouldn’t do it or we shouldn’t do it. We have to make sure whatever we do that it is going to work… and realize that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon.”


Pakistan has also proved willing to help Iran break out of the tightening sanctions noose,
This provocative appointment laid bare Pakistan’s long and constant clandestine links with Iran in support of its nuclear program. They go back 23 years to 1989, when Abdul Qadeer Khan, father of the Pakistan bomb, who also ran a nuclear black market, visited Tehran and persuaded Iranian leaders to start enriching uranium independently with Pakistani P1-model centrifuges. They are still in use today.
Iran has made important concessions on its nuclear program – less than claimed by sources within the Obama administration, but betokening an improvement in bilateral relations.
2. The US will phase out sanctions in time with Tehran’s provision of nuclear transparency and confidence-building gestures. The sequence would start with lifting the cutoff of Iran’s access to SWIFT money-transferring services and the ending of the embargo on Iranian oil.
Saudi Arabian Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi announced the kingdom was pumping 9.9 million barrels per day – the highest level in decades – and was willing to turn the taps up to a maximum capacity of 12.5 million bpd to meet its customers’ every request.
This week, US acted to stymie Saudi operations in two key arenas:
2. The Obama administration is firing every stratagem in its quiver to hold Saudi Arabia back from military intervention in the Syria crisis.
This Saudi plan was soon nipped in the bud.
As for Syria, Bashar Assad will have understood by now that Riyadh is rolling up its sleeves for military action against him as soon as a way can be found. Four complications are unfolding:
Erdogan had hoped his meeting with President Obama in Seoul later this month would end with him flying directly from South Korea to Iran to present Khamenei with Obama’s decisions.
3. Back to Iran, on March 12, the Washington-based Al Monitor (self-styled “Pulse of the Middle East”) ran a revealing interview with former US senator from Nebraska Chuck Hagel, a close Obama associate and co-chairman of his intelligence advisory board.
4. Tuesday night, March 20, six days after President Obama’s ringing announcement ,“We’ve applied our toughest sanctions ever on Iran,” Secretary of State Clinton suddenly announced the administration had decided to extend exemptions from those sanctions to Japan and 10 European countries, Britain, Germany, Belgium, France, Czech Republic, Greece, Italy, Spain, Holland and Poland.
The disparity in their respective military capabilities lies at the heart of this gap: America possesses the resources to hit nuclear installations after they are buried in fortified underground sites. However, once Iran starts using those bunkers for building a bomb, Israel forfeits the military option for attacking them.
2. With this endorsement in the bag, Netanyahu and Barak felt able to send the IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz to Washington to meet Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Martin E. Dempsey with a clear message:





Recent Comments