Archive for November 22, 2011

Canada laments cracks in Iran, Syria sanctions

November 22, 2011

AFP: Canada laments cracks in Iran, Syria sanctions.

OTTAWA — Canada’s top diplomat on Tuesday lamented cracks in the West’s imposing of sanctions on Syria and Iran while also urging Russia and China to get onboard.

“We’d like to see others follow suit with the tough sanctions that Canada has” imposed on Iran, Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird said one day after new sanctions against the Islamic republic were announced by the United States, Britain and Canada.

On Syria, he added: “We can’t even get a resolution of condemnation, let alone sanctions… through the UN Security Council.”

“That’s regrettable,” he said in comments directed at Russia and China after the two permanent members of the Security Council blocked UN sanctions against Syria.

The new sanctions aimed at pressuring Tehran after the publication of the UN nuclear watchdog’s most damning report yet on the Iranian nuclear program.

The measures seek to limit the West’s links with the Iranian Central Bank — which has been key in funneling proceeds of energy sales to Iran’s government.

Iran’s energy sales are thought to account for around 70 percent of the government’s budget and are crucial to the broader Iranian economy.

However, the US government stopped short of adopting fully blown sanctions against Iran’s central bank. And the British measures reportedly will not directly impact trade in Iranian oil.

Canada does not import oil from Iran, but banned sales to Iran’s petrochemical, oil and gas industry.

Iran, already hit with four rounds of UN sanctions, strongly denies its nuclear program is geared towards making a bomb.

Report: Hezbollah considering military coup if Assad falls

November 22, 2011

Report: Hezbollah considering military coup if Assad falls – Israel News, Ynetnews.

 

Sources tell al-Arabia network Shiite group planning to ‘seize parts of Beirut’ should Assad’s regime fall for fear of foreign intervention in Lebanon

Roee Nahmias

 

Hezbollah‘s leadership is considering the possibility of taking control of Beirut and effectively carrying out a military coup in Lebanon should the current Syrian regime fall, the al-Arabia network reported Tuesday.

According to the report, Hezbollah members have expressed concerns over the escalation of the civil uprising in Syria, which could lead to the fall of Bashar Assad‘s regime. The Syrian president is an ally of the Lebanese Shiite group.

 

Sources close to Hezbollah noted that it was due to those concerns that the Hezbollah leadership was examining various scenarios – including a “broad maneuver on the ground,” similar to the takeover of Beirut in May 2008. However, the current plans apparently include a much more extensive maneuver which may expand to a military coup. 

“As soon as Hezbollah will sense that the collapse of Assad’s regime is imminent, armed cells will quickly begin operating to seize control of Beirut’s eastern and western parts,” one of the sources told al-Arabia. 

“This operation, which will be coordinated with Hezbollah’s allies, including Michel Aoun’s Free Patriotic Movement, will be carried out under the banner of ‘protecting the resistance and its weapons inside Lebanon,'” he said.

 

According to the source, Hezbollah will explain that the takeover “as an act that is aimed at countering Lebanese forces plotting to suppress the resistance in cooperation with foreign elements – headed by Israel – and take advantage of (Assad’s downfall) to annihilate Hezbollah.” 

About a week and a half ago Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah warned Israeland the US that a war against Iran and Syria would lead to an all-out regional conflict. 

“They should understand that a war on Iran and Syria will not remain in Iran and Syrian territory, but it will engulf the whole region and there is no escaping this reality,” Nasrallah said during a televised speech honoring “Martyrs’ Day.”

Turkey’s Erdogan urges Assad to ‘finally step down’ for sake of Mideast peace

November 22, 2011

Turkey’s Erdogan urges Assad to ‘finally step down’ for sake of Mideast peace – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

Turkish prime minister says President Assad must go ‘without spilling any more blood’; Syria activists report at least 9 killed by Assad forces in Homs, Hama areas.

By DPA and Reuters

Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan called on Tuesday for Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down for the sake of peace in the region and to stop any more bloodshed.

 

“Without spilling any more blood, without causing any more injustice, for the sake of peace for the people, the country and the region, finally step down,” Erdogan told a meeting of his ruling AK Party.

 

Assad Erdogan- AP- Oct. 11, 2010 Syrian President Bashar Assad, right, shakes hands with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, left, in Damascus, Syria last year.
Photo by: AP

 

Tuesday saw further violence in Syria, as activists reported that forces loyal to the Assad regime had killed four villagers near Homs. Earlier, an activist based in northern Lebanon said that the Homs area was surrounded by security forces.

 

“The neighborhood of al-Bayyada area is now completely surrounded by the gangs of (Syrian President Bashar) Assad who are backed by army tanks,” the activist said.

 

Syria’s state media said that “the Syrian army is carrying out a military operation in the neighborhood in search for “armed gangs who are terrorizing the civilians.”

 

Syrian troops also reportedly stormed areas on the outskirts of the capital Damascus Tuesday in a search for army defectors, activists based in Beirut told dpa.

The move by the Syrian army came after defectors a week ago attacked a base of the Syrian airforce intelligence.

 

Meanwhile, sound of heavy machine gun fire was heard across the area of Douma, near Damascus, Syrian activist Omar Ildibi said.

 

On Monday, 20 people were killed, most of whom were from the al-Bayyada neighborhood, in attacks carried by the Syrian security forces.

 

Iran’s Maginot Line

November 22, 2011

Articles: Iran’s Maginot Line.

By Gene Schwimmer

 

One of the most important skills in warfare is the art of misdirection.  Like the magician who draws attention to one hand doing one thing while the other hand does another, the attacker who can beguile his enemy into diverting most of his resources to repelling an attack expected in one area, and then attack in another, gains a significant advantage.  It was the key to victory at Normandy, and, this writer would argue, our failure to attack Iran when the whole world was focused on Iraq will go down as one of history’s greatest missed opportunities.  Had we done so, needless to say and notwithstanding the anticipated howls of protest from the “international community,” we would be looking at a much safer and more stable Middle East than what we have today.

Israel, too, has blundered.  But also, to her credit, she has demonstrated, time and again, the ability to learn from those mistakes and to avoid repeating them.  Nor is she a slouch at the art of misdirection.

And when, in prepping past attacks such as those on the nascent nuclear capabilities of Iraq and Syria or the hostage rescue at Entebbe, have the Israelis ever broadcast their intentions beforehand?

So, as the urgency and bellicosity of Israel’s diplomatic rhetoric has intensified over the past few weeks, this writer can’t help wondering whether something else, less obvious, might be going on.

Is Israel practicing the art of misdirection?

One of the keys to Israel’s swift victory in the ’67 Six-Day War was her ability to destroy Egypt’s air force while most of it was still on the ground, achieving at the outset the air superiority essential to victory in modern warfare.  Conversely, one of the key obstacles to victory in the ’73 Yom Kippur War was Egypt’s Russian-made surface-to-air Missiles, which, to Israel’s dismay, proved surprisingly effective in downing Israeli aircraft.  Surely, giving insufficient consideration to an enemy’s air defenses is a mistake the Israel Air Force (IAF) would take special care not to repeat.  Indeed, it is good to remember that, while Iran’s growing nuclear capability is of course a major Israeli casus belli, Israel has made it clear that Iran’s potential acquisition of advanced Russian S-300 SAMs, capable of neutralizing Israel’s vaunted air superiority, would be another..

Consider also, as many have pointed out, that given how deeply underground Iran has embedded its nuclear facilities, a single Israeli attack on those facilities most likely would only delay, not end Iran’s nuclear program, making (unless the Iranian regime falls in the meantime) one or more repeat attacks necessary.

It would thus seem that the logical goal of an initial Israeli attack would be not to destroy Iran’s nuclear capability (though, like the Jewish grandmother offering the chicken soup, “it couldn’t hurt”), but to destroy Iran’s air-defense capabilities.  In other words, don’t settle for evading Iran’s air force on the way to attacking her nuclear sites — destroy it, preferably while it is still on the ground.  Ditto for her ground-to-air missiles and launchers.  Then go after the nuke sites.

For Israel, the choices could not be clearer: allow Iran control of its airspace, able to deter any IAF attack, and an Iranian bomb becomes inevitable.  But deprive Iran of that control, dominate the sky above Iran, and Israel would be free to attack Iran’s nuclear sites — and Republican Guard, and Navy, and Air Force (should Iran attempt to rebuild it) — anywhere, anytime, as often as necessary.  And, thanks to Israel’s spy satellites and modern GPS targeting, the inability of a single Israeli guided bomb to penetrate to the depth of Iran’s buried nuclear production sites probably would be irrelevant; if the first bomb fails to do the job, send in another right after it, and another.  With Israel in command of the sky above, she would have, literally, all the time in the world to finish the job.

And of course, Israel would also have all the time it needs to destroy Iran’s ballistic missiles and launchers — the ones capable of reaching Israel…and, in time, us.

But would that really be necessary?  Much is made of Iran’s deeply buried nuclear sites.  But those sites are useless if the Iranians can’t get to them.  Therefore, it may not be necessary to destroy the sites, but merely to seal the entrances.  With luck, the IAF might even trap some essential personnel (and Ahmadinejad?) inside.  Ideally, the IAF would do enough damage to render the underground facilities inaccessible for a considerable time.  But again, with the IAF controlling the airspace, Israel could allow the Iranians to spend considerable time, effort, and money clearing the entrances and then seal them again — and again, and again, as often as Iran tries to unseal them.  Most likely, the Iranians, knowing this, would not even bother, but in any case, preventing access to Iran’s nuclear production sites would be much easier than destroying the sites themselves, while achieving the same practical effect..

But the important point to take from this is the obvious fact that the deeper Iran buries her sites, the harder it will be to restore access to them if Israel seals the entrances.

By burying her nuclear facilities so deeply below the ground to shield them from attack, could Iran, ironically, have succeeded only in creating an Iranian Maginot Line?

Moscow, Tehran say new US sanctions on Iran unacceptable

November 22, 2011

Moscow, Tehran say new US sancti… JPost – Iranian Threat – News.

Russia's Medvedev, Iran's Ahmadinejad, Baku

    Russia’s Foreign Ministry denounced new US sanctions against Iran on Tuesday as “unacceptable and contradictory to international law,” Interfax news agency reported.

The United States, worried by Tehran’s nuclear program, named Iran on Monday as an area of “primary money laundering concern” in a step designed to dissuade non-US banks from dealing with it.

It also blacklisted 11 entities suspected of aiding its nuclear programs and expanded sanctions to target companies that aid its oil and petrochemical industries.

Iran dismissed new sanctions as more a propaganda exercise than something that will hit the economy.

“Such measures are condemned by our people and will have no impact and be in vain,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast told a news conference Tuesday.

US President Barack Obama said Monday that the United States had identified “the entire Iranian banking sector – including the Central Bank of Iran – as a threat to governments or financial institutions that do business with Iranian banks.”

Obama said Washington would continue to look for ways to pressure Tehran over its nuclear program.

“As long as Iran continues down this dangerous path, the United States will continue to find ways, both in concert with our partners and through our own actions to isolate and increase the pressure upon the Iranian regime,” he said.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner made an official announcement on Monday afternoon detailing the series of new sanctions against Tehran, focusing on Iran’s money-raising activities.

Geithner declared the Central Bank of Iran to be a “primary money laundering concern,” a step short of official sanctions that would require the United States to cut off access to any foreign institution that does business with the bank. That more drastic step would have presented serious problems for US business if states such as China and Russia fail, as they are expected, to cut off ties with Tehran. The new category would simply warn off foreign governments and companies from dealing with Iranian institutions.

Clinton phoned Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu Monday evening to brief him on the sanctions the US decided to level against Iran.

The United Kingdom started off the trans-Atlantic sanctions announcements earlier Monday when the British government announced their decision to terminate all dealings with the Central Bank of Iran, a decision that covers all Iranian banks, branches and subsidiaries.

“This measure will protect the UK financial sector from being unknowingly used by Iranian banks for proliferation related transactions,” said George Osborne, Britain’s treasury chief.

Iran’s nuclear activities “pose a significant risk to the national interests of the UK and countries across the region.”

Since the November 8 publication of the IAEA’s report on Iran, the US has been pushing for international cooperation in policing Tehran’s nuclear production initiatives. Last week’s meeting of the nuclear watchdog organization’s board of governors yielded a statement calling on Iran to open itself to inspectors, but stopped short of major international steps against Tehran’s march toward nuclear armament.

Iranian representatives were conspicuously absent from a two-day meeting in Vienna held to discuss nuclear non-proliferation in the Middle East. In the shadow of the recent report slamming Iran’s nuclear aspirations, the IAEA hosted representatives of a number of Middle Eastern states, including Israel, for a discussion on creating a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the area.

There are already nuclearweapon- free zones in South America, Africa, the south Pacific and parts of Asia.

In addition to the nuclear faceoff and the terror plot targeting the Saudi ambassador to Washington, it looked Monday that there was yet another factor in Washington’s growing tensions with Iran.

The Washington Post revealed Monday that Iran was suspected of having provided former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi with hundreds of artillery shells filled with “highly toxic mustard agent.” These shells, discovered in recent sweeps of Libya by anti-Gaddafi forces, were beyond the purview of the minimal amounts of chemical agents that the US knew that Gaddafi held.

The Washington Post article quoted a senior US official as saying that the US “was pretty sure” that the shells were custom- designed and produced in Iran for Libya.

Washington is also concerned that more than a dozen undercover agents working for the CIA who were caught in both Iran and Lebanon will be or already have been executed, ABC News quoted US officials as saying on Monday.

According to the report, the agents were paid informants, hired by the CIA to spy on Iran and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

“Many risks lead to wins, but some result in occasional setbacks,” ABC quoted an official as saying. The arrests occurred over the past six months, he added.

The officials gave credit to Iran and Hezbollah for uncovering the two espionage rings, but say sloppy CIA “tradecraft” was also partly to blame for the discovery of the networks.

“We were lazy and the CIA is now flying blind against Hezbollah,” a former official was quoted as saying.

Herb Keinon and Jerusalem Post staff contributed to this report.

Obama urges more pressure on Iran’s financial system

November 22, 2011

Obama urges more pressure on Ira… JPost – Iranian Threat – News.

US President Barack Obama.

    WASHINGTON – US President Barack Obama said on Monday the United States, Britain and Canada were cutting Iran off from its financial systems and encouraged other countries to do the same.

Obama said the United States had identified “the entire Iranian banking sector — including the Central Bank of Iran — as a threat to governments or financial institutions that do business with Iranian banks.”

Obama said Washington would continue to look for ways to pressure Tehran over its nuclear program.

“As long as Iran continues down this dangerous path, the United States will continue to find ways, both in concert with our partners and through our own actions to isolate and increase the pressure upon the Iranian regime,” he said.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner made an official announcement on Monday afternoon detailing the series of new sanctions against Tehran, focusing on Iran’s money-raising activities.

Geithner declared the Central Bank of Iran to be a “primary money laundering concern,” a step short of official sanctions that would require the United States to cut off access to any foreign institution that does business with the bank. That more drastic step would have presented serious problems for US business if states such as China and Russia fail, as they are expected, to cut off ties with Tehran. The new category would simply worn off foreign governments and companies from dealing with Iranian institutions.

Clinton phoned Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu Monday evening to brief him on the sanctions the US decided to level against Iran.

According to a statement put out by the Prime Minister’s Office, Netanyahu said, “sanctions like these make clear to the Iranians that there will be a high price if they continue with their nuclear program.”

The United Kingdom started off the trans-Atlantic sanctions announcements earlier Monday when the British government announced their decision to terminate all dealings with the Central Bank of Iran, a decision that covers all Iranian banks, branches and subsidiaries.

“This measure will protect the UK financial sector from being unknowingly used by Iranian banks for proliferation related transactions,” said George Osborne, Britain’s treasury chief.

Iran’s nuclear activities “pose a significant risk to the national interests of the UK and countries across the region.”

The American Jewish Committee was quick to respond to England’s announcement.

“England’s bold initiative to single out the Central Bank of Iran is a much-needed punitive measure to press Iran to stop its nuclear weapons program,” said AJC executive-director David Harris.

“We hope other countries will quickly follow the British lead to enhance the measure’s effectiveness.

Iran’s defiance of the international will must be countered with the strongest possible coordinated efforts to defeat this clear threat to global security,” said Harris.

“Tightening the noose around Iran’s economy is essential to ending Iran’s nuclear program, though ultimately full impact requires the cooperation of China, Russia and other countries that mistakenly continue to do business as usual with Iran.”

Since the November 8 publication of the IAEA’s report on Iran, the US has been pushing for international cooperation in policing Tehran’s nuclear production initiatives. Last week’s meeting of the nuclear watchdog organization’s board of governors yielded a statement calling on Iran to open itself to inspectors, but stopped short of major international steps against Tehran’s march toward nuclear armament.

Iranian representatives were conspicuously absent from a two-day meeting in Vienna held to discuss nuclear non-proliferation in the Middle East. In the shadow of the recent report slamming Iran’s nuclear aspirations, the IAEA hosted representatives of a number of Middle Eastern states, including Israel, for a discussion on creating a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the area.

There are already nuclearweapon- free zones in South America, Africa, the south Pacific and parts of Asia.

In addition to the nuclear faceoff and the terror plot targeting the Saudi ambassador to Washington, it looked Monday that there was yet another factor in Washington’s growing tensions with Iran.

The Washington Post revealed Monday that Iran was suspected of having provided former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi with hundreds of artillery shells filled with “highly toxic mustard agent.” These shells, discovered in recent sweeps of Libya by anti-Gaddafi forces, were beyond the purview of the minimal amounts of chemical agents that the US knew that Gaddafi held.

The Washington Post article quoted a senior US official as saying that the US “was pretty sure” that the shells were custom- designed and produced in Iran for Libya.

Washington is also concerned that more than a dozen undercover agents working for the CIA who were caught in both Iran and Lebanon will be or already have been executed, ABC News quoted US officials as saying on Monday.

According to the report, the agents were paid informants, hired by the CIA to spy on Iran and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

“Many risks lead to wins, but some result in occasional setbacks,” ABC quoted an official as saying. The arrests occurred over the past six months, he added.

The officials gave credit to Iran and Hezbollah for uncovering the two espionage rings, but say sloppy CIA “tradecraft” was also partly to blame for the discovery of the networks.

“We were lazy and the CIA is now flying blind against Hezbollah,” a former official was quoted as saying.

Herb Keinon and Jerusalem Post staff contributed to this report.

Iran Will Never End Its Nuclear Quest Because It Believes Allah Is Protecting The Country

November 22, 2011

Iran Will Never End Its Nuclear Quest Because It Believes Allah Is Protecting The Country | Fox News.

Despite the IAEA’s recent report on Iran’s nuclear ambitions, the country’s leadership couldn’t care less. They remain unconcerned about the West’s denunciations and threats of further sanctions even after the international nuclear watchdog reported last week that the Islamic regime is building nuclear weapons.

There will be no comprise with the United States and its allies, Iran insists, because the regime’s critics fail to understand the nature of what Tehran’s radicals call the “true Islam.”

Days after the report by the IAEA, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, pointedly warned America and what he called its “guard dog,” the Zionist regime of Israel, that any attack on Iran will result in the destruction of both.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Iran will not retreat “one iota” from its nuclear program, and Revolutionary Guard commanders promised a response that will “shock the enemy,” boasting that with only four missiles Israel will be annihilated and America can expect the same fate.

Iranian officials have long believed that their commitment to Islam has earned them the protection of Allah, thus ensuring their success in confronting the West, engaging America in Iraq and Afghanistan, strengthening terrorist proxies against Israel, and progressing with their missile and nuclear programs.

This commitment could best be described by an analysis reflected on Gerdab.Ir, the media outlet of the Revolutionary Guards. It claims that it has been more than a decade since Americans began to fear the true soldiers of Islam; this fear has been manifested in several ways, specifically since the U.S. sent military forces into the region after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, eventually occupying both Afghanistan and Iraq.

That is when they got a firsthand, serious taste of what it means to come face to face with the Quds Force, the analysis says, and that is when the U.S. recognized the eminence of the power of Islamic Iran in the region.

The analysis shows why sanctions and diplomatic initiatives won’t work with this very dangerous regime. Here, loosely translated and summarized from Gerdab.Ir are the key points the Revolutionary Guards make in their analysis:

* Approximately 10 years ago, when the United States and its allies established an expansive military presence in the region, they could not imagine what power they would come up against and who the real competing authority would be. The Americans viewed the Middle East as a wide-open space in which they would have no resistance.

Now, after 10 years, they have finally realized what operational, communication, intelligence and political limitations they face, and that has left them no viable option but to pack up and leave. And the Quds Force played the most vital of roles in exhausting the hubris of the American war machinery in the Middle East.

* The problem facing Americans regarding the Quds Force is but a small example of the core of their problem with the entire Islamic Revolution. The most important fact that America and the West have continuously missed is the ideology behind Iran’s destiny. Its doctrine knows no boundaries and stands in diametric opposition to and defiance of the most basic principles and fundamental forms taken by Western civilization.

* Fear of the Quds Force is fear of the conquering and uncompromising force of the Islamic Revolutionaries. The Quds Force’s main thrust is to remind Muslims that the faction that considers moderation in the name of the struggle is not Islam. Actually, the real Islam combats fake polarity, and today the dominant polarizing forces are the Americans and the Zionists.

* Combating Israel and staying on top of all that has the stench of America on it are the fuels that feed the vital engine of revolutionary Islam in the Middle East.

* Americans know that their biggest and most aggressive problem in the future is the way they grapple with the return of political Islam in that part of the world. The factor that makes this issue much more formidable is that America has finally figured out that the return of political Islam, the combination of religion and government, follows the Iranian model; Iran is the only country in the world that has been successful in commingling religion and government.

* Fear of the Quds Force is a fear of the blurring of borders. Quds teaches the devout that rather than staying in one’s own element, they should combat the enemy from inside the enemy’s element. Fear of the Quds Force is to fear the greatest and bravest of Iranian men who in total anonymity, and in the most dangerous security zones, fight on without hesitation and selflessly in order to expand the focus of Islam.

The United States must not give in to the irrational philosophy articulated above. The safety of the world is at stake.

The recent IAEA report indicated that not only is Iran on the threshold of acquiring nuclear weapons but also that today Iran has produced 4,922 kilograms of enriched uranium, enough for seven nuclear warheads once further enriched. The IAEA alarmingly revealed that nearly 20 kilograms (about 45 pounds) of a component used to arm nuclear warheads was unaccounted for in Iran. That amount would be enough to arm a nuclear bomb.

As Iran’s leaders move ahead with arming their missiles with nuclear warheads, we must realize that the policy of mutually assured destruction will be proven as wrong as our current approach of negotiation and sanctions.

The key to understanding this enemy is to understand its ideology. As Sun Tzu said in “The Art of War,” “know your enemy.”

Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for an ex-CIA spy who requires anonymity for safety reasons. He is a Senior Fellow with EMPact America and the author of “A Time to Betray,” a book about his double life as a CIA agent in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, published by Threshold Editions, Simon & Schuster, April 2010. “A Time to Betray” was the winner of the 2010 National Best Book Award, and the 2011 International Best Book Award.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/11/21/iran-will-never-end-its-nuclear-quest-because-it-believes-allah-is-protecting/#ixzz1ePRW0o9e