Archive for November 3, 2011

Report: Netanyahu ordered Shin Bet to investigate leaks on Iran attack

November 3, 2011

Report: Netanyahu ordered Shin Bet to investigate leaks on Iran attack – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

(We are witnessing either an historic breakdown of Israel’s security, or a massive disinformation campaign.  If disinformation, is it to make Iran think it will be attacked or not?  Is it just to sew confusion causing Iran to make a mistake? – JW)

According to Kuwaiti al-Jarida newspaper, Israeli sources say former Mossad and Shin Bet chiefs are behind leaks.

By Barak Ravid

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instructed Shin Bet chief Yoram Cohen to begin investigating the information recently leaked to the media regarding Israel’s preparations for a military offensive against Iran’s nuclear facilities, the Kuwaiti al-Jarida newspaper reported Thursday.

According to the report, former Mossad chief Meir Dagan and former Shin Bet chief Yuval Diskin are those responsible for leaking information to the media regarding an attack on Iran.

Netanyahu, cabinet, Shalit swap deal From right: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Shin Bet chief Yoram Cohen, Minister Silvan Shalom and Minister Dan Meridor at Tuesday’s special cabinet meeting.
Photo by: GPO

“The two recruited prominent journalists in Israel and disclosed false information in order to politically harm Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak,” the newspaper quoted an Israeli source.

According to the source, Diskin wanted revenge for not receiving the post of Mossad chief and Dagan was disgruntled since his term as Mossad chief was not extended.

The newspaper also quotes a source in the Prime Minister’s Office who claims opposition head Tzipi Livni was also recruited to the media campaign in order to accuse Netanyahu and Barak of harming national interests. The goal of the media campaign, according to the source, is to prevent an attack on Iran and to remove Netanyahu from the prime minister’s post.

The report also quotes an Israeli source claiming Israel’s plan for a military offensive on Iran’s nuclear facilities has moved ahead from discussion stage to the preparation stage.

“This fact pushed those opposing the move to leak the details to the press and to effectively foil the operation,” the Israeli source told the newspaper.

No reporter is signed off on the report, but the newspaper has published similar reports about leaks in Israel’s Prime Minister’s Office in the past which turned out to be true.

Obama says pressure must be maintained on Iran

November 3, 2011

Obama says pressure must be main… JPost – Iranian Threat – News.

Obama announces withdrawal of US troops from Iraq

    CANNES – US President Barack Obama said he and French President Nicolas Sarkozy agreed during talks on Thursday on the need for pressure to be maintained on Iran over its nuclear program.

“We had the opportunity to talk about a range of security issues,” Obama told reporters following talks with Sarkozy ahead of a G20 heads of state summit in the French resort of Cannes.

“One in particular that I want to mention is the continuing threat posed by Iran’s nuclear program. The IAEA is scheduled to release a report on Iran’s nuclear program next week and President Sarkozy and I agree on the need to maintain the unprecedented pressure on Iran to meet its obligations.”

On Wednesday, a US congressional committee approved tougher sanctions on Iran, hitting out at Tehran’s central bank following an alleged Iranian plot to kill the Saudi ambassador to Washington.

The bipartisan legislation has good prospects for clearing the House of Representatives in the near future. In the Senate, lawmakers in both parties are working on similar legislation, increasing the likelihood that some version will become law.

IDF holds drill simulating rocket attack on central Israel

November 3, 2011

IDF holds drill simulating rocket attack on central Israel – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

Sirens sound throughout central Israel for 90 seconds; drill comes amid mounting speculation that Israeli leaders could be preparing attack on Iran.

By Anshel Pfeffer

Sirens sounded throughout central Israel on Thursday as part of a Home Front Command drill simulating a rocket attack on civilian infrastructure. The drill comes against the backdrop of a fiery debate in Israel about a possible attack on Iran.

As part of Thursday’s Israel Defense Forces drill, sirens went off around central Israel at 10:05 A.M for 90 seconds. Moreover, evacuation and absorption centers are due to open in the central Israeli city of Holon and temporary centers in Holon and Bat Yam will open in order to hand out gas masks.

Home Front Command drill Home Front Command drill in Tel Aviv
Photo by: Alon Ron

The Home Front Command stressed that the drill is part of a yearly exercise which has been long-planned.

On Wednesday, the IDF test-fired a ballistic missile at the Palmahim base in central Israel. The test was part of an examination of a new missile currently being developed by the defense establishment.

A Defense Ministry official declined to comment on the type of rocket tested, but it is known it was capable of carrying nuclear warheads.

The launch coincided with mounting speculation in Israel that its leaders could be preparing a military attack on Iran to curb a nuclear program they say is aimed at producing atomic weapons. Iran says its nuclear activities are peaceful.

Moreover, Haaretz reported on Wednesday that the Israel Air Force recently conducted comprehensive drills on long-range attacks at the NATO base in Italy.

The drill included most of the aviation components that are likely to take part in future long-range attacking missions: combat squadrons, aerial refueling and air monitoring stations.

Normally, long-range drills last two weeks, but the IAF left this drill after five days, and by the weekend all the IAF planes had returned to their air bases in Israel.

The IAF’s early departure ignited the spreading of conspiracy theories which suggested Israel was heading into a possible mission, but according to a senior IAF official, the departure was not sudden and spontaneous, rather a short visit planned from the start, due to time constraints of the Italian and Israeli air forces.

A military war of nerves against Iran: The US leads, Israel and UK go along

November 3, 2011

DEBKAfile, Political Analysis, Espionage, Terrorism, Security.

DEBKAfile Special Report November 2, 2011, 10:46 PM (GMT+02:00)


HMS Astute: British nuclear attack submarine

The sudden rush of military news Wednesday, Nov. 2, was part of an orchestrated Western performance to persuade Tehran that the US, Britain and Israel are on the verge of a military operation against its nuclear installations. The show, directed from Washington, was meant to warn Iran that  military punishment was in store unless it gives up its drive for a nuclear weapon. If Tehran continues to hold out, President Barack Obama may decide to strike Revolutionary Guards Corps, the bulwark of the Islamic regime, as well as its strategic infrastructure, thereby removing key props holding up the regime of the ayatollahs.
Contributing to the menacing climate hanging over Iran were four headline events involving Israel – all on the same Wednesday: Israel conducted a successful test launch of a new intercontinental ballistic missile, Jericho 3, which foreign sources report is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead 7,000 kilometers.

After that, the IDF released photographs of Israeli Air Force squadron leaders reporting  from Italian air base runways  to the media on joint exercises they had conducted in long-range maneuvers with the Italian air force “and other NATO nations,” to familiarize the IAF with NATO military tactics.

The inference was clear: The Israeli Air Force was strengthening its cooperation with Western allies in preparation for a NATO assault on Iran. The IAF also got a chance to study the lessons Western alliance air force tacticians had drawn from the eight-month Libyan operation which ended on Oct. 31.
Next, the IDF’s Home Command announced a large-scale anti-missile exercise in central Israel starting Thursday morning, Nov. 3.
Finally, Defense Minister Ehud Barak left for an unscheduled trip to London shortly after a secret visit to Israel by the British chief of staff General Sir David Richards earlier this week as guest of Israel’s top soldier Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz.
If the British general was in Israel only this week, why was Barak is such a hurry to visit London?

The answer came from the British media, which reported as soon as he arrived that the Ministry of Defense in London had accelerated and upgraded its contingency planning for participation in a US-led assault on Iran. They carried an account of plans for deploying large naval units including submarines to the Persian Gulf.

The UK was reported to have asked Washington for permission to station its fighter-bombers on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia for launching bombing sorties against Iran.

This whirlwind of military activity was said to have been prompted by the approaching publication of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Iran report next Tuesday, Nov. 8 and the conclusion the nuclear watchdog had reached: Inside 12 months, Iran will have tucked all its nuclear and ballistic missile facilities away in deep underground tunnels where they will be invulnerable to attack.
A potential US-British strike to pre-empt this move would also be timed for the run-up to America’s next presidential election in November 2012.

debkafile‘s military sources report that if the US, Britain and other NATO nations, such as France, Italy and Germany, participate in the attack, Israel will not. Its army, air force and navy will defend the home front, be available to engage Iran’s allies to prevent them from striking the assault forces from the rear, and act as a strategic reserve. The danger would come from Syria, the Lebanese Hizballah, and the Palestinian Hamas and Jihad Islami in the Gaza Strip.

These contingency plans are subject to changes, especially if President Obama and other NATO allies decide after all against attacking Iran in the coming year. The hyperactivity will then subside and Israel will be thrown back on the dilemma of having to decide whether or not to conduct a lone military operation against Iran.

There is not much time for contemplation. Syria and Hizballah are reported by debkafile‘s military sources to be in the throes of separate preparations for attacking Israel if their respective grips on power are shaken. For now, those sources rate the chances of Israel facing a military clash with Syria and/or Hizballah much higher than a NATO-Israeli showdown being mounted against Iran.

Analysis: What is the ‘real’ Israeli stance on Iran?

November 3, 2011

Analysis: What is the ‘real’ Israeli stance on… JPost – Defense.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu [file]

    A number of observers are firmly convinced that the wave of recent Hebrew media reports on a possible Israeli strike on Iran are the product of a dangerous and potentially illegal collaboration between insiders opposed to such an attack and pro-opposition media outlets dedicated to damaging Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

According to this view, what began as a trickle of isolated but unmissable front-page reports suggesting that Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak may have made up their minds to go ahead with an attack quickly turned into an avalanche of reports that has hijacked the national agenda and endangered national security in an unprecedented manner.

Subscribers to this view believe such reports have politicized fateful issues that lie at the heart of the nation’s well-being in the Middle East.

Whether or not such claims are accurate, Israel has also apparently joined the “message-sending” club this week, days before the UN’s IAEA is due to release its most severe report on Iran’s nuclear program to date.

The succession of defensive and offensive exercises held in Israel and Sardinia appears to be an unmistakable signal that Jerusalem has not removed the military option, along with its repercussions, from the table.

Two Israeli voices, one signaling Israel’s seriousness over the threat, and another expressing its opposition to an attack, may be behind the flurry of headlines in recent days. Either way, the urgency of the Iranian question is now firmly at the top of the national agenda.

Israel and Iran are fighting a war of nerves

November 3, 2011

Israel and Iran are fighting a war of nerves – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

The speed of events on the Israel-Iran front is beginning to recall the eve of a war.

By Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff

 

Israel conducts a rare ballistic missile test; the Israel Air Force reports a successful exercise in Sardinia, far from home; Iran’s chief of staff says the “likelihood is low” of an Israeli attack, but threatens that his country would respond forcefully.

British sources tell The Guardian of preparations for an attack on Iran’s nuclear sites coordinated with the United States; Britain’s chief of staff makes a secret visit to Israel. The defense minister goes to London for talks; MKs from the extreme right demand that the former head of the Mossad be put on trial (! ) for daring to object to an Israeli attack. The speed of events on the Israel-Iran front is beginning to recall the eve of a war.

Shahin missile, Iran - AP 9.03.2011 The purported launching of a Shahin missile during war games in Iran.
Photo by: AP

What’s happening now between Jerusalem and Tehran is a war of signals and public threats. But it’s the way the declarations are translated into actions at the International Atomic Energy Agency and the UN Security Council, and in Western capitals, that will dictate developments in the coming weeks.

Almost anything goes in this war of nerves. Reasonable citizens, at this point quite worried, should take into consideration that a great deal is happening covertly. At least some of these moves are part of a carefully orchestrated campaign whose purpose is not necessarily an Israeli attack. It could be a means of sparking a broad diplomatic maneuver to ratchet up sanctions on Iran.

News outlets, especially on the Web, have a tendency to link every unimportant scrap of news to a general conspiracy. But the fact that a search-and-rescue exercise is taking place on Thursday in the Petah Tikva area doesn’t mean we’re on the verge of a regional war.

Even the controversy over the media’s preoccupation with the possibility of an attack is misleading. Ostensibly, if the prime minister and defense minister were going to strike, they would be the first to be worried about supposedly secret operational details exposed in the press. But Ehud Barak was interviewed at length on Army Radio Monday and did not mention any damage. And two people who did attack the chatter are ministers considered opponents of an attack, Benny Begin and Dan Meridor.

The most interesting event on Wednesday was the ballistic missile test. Foreign sources say Israel has the ability to attach a nuclear warhead to a ballistic missile. Only a few days ago a British report said Israel was working to increase the range of its Jericho 3 missile. Such a test now suggests that maybe the missile test was a signal to Iran.

The problem with that explanation is that a test launch requires months of preparation, with hundreds of people involved. It’s not a spur-of-the-moment decision. Still, the defense minister approved the launch, with the prime minister’s knowledge. Presumably the two were aware of the spin it would be given, yet they did not cancel it.

So what’s really going on here? It seems that only Netanyahu and Barak know, and maybe even they haven’t decided. While many people say Netanyahu and Barak are conducting sophisticated psychological warfare and don’t intend to launch a military operation, top officials, including some in the forum of eight senior ministers, are still afraid.

Ostensibly, Israel is in a win-win situation. If its scare tactics work, the international community will impose paralyzing sanctions on Iran. If the world falls asleep at its post, there are alternatives.

But this is a dangerous game. A few more weeks of tension and one party or another might make a fatal mistake that will drag the region into war. Barak, the brilliant planner, should know this. More than once in the past his complex plans have gone seriously awry.

The Iranian sphere is not the only place where Israel is playing with fire. The timing of the decision of the eight senior ministers Tuesday to punish the Palestinian Authority by building 2,000 more housing units in the territories and to withhold PA tax money is particularly problematic.

That’s because on Sunday many of the tens of thousands of PA security service members will go on Id al-Adha vacation. Withholding the funds, coupled with the U.S. Congress’ decision to freeze $192 million in aid to the PA, means the PA security forces will receive no salary in the coming months. These are the very forces Israel’s security establishment credits with maintaining relative quiet in the West Bank over the past few years.

It seems that for the forum of eight, the PA’s very application for membership to UNESCO – no doubt a critical institution to Israel’s security – is an offense that requires just retribution.

Steps that were meant to discourage the PA from approaching other UN agencies could end up compromising the security of Israelis, particularly those living over the Green Line. Some 150 Hamas terrorists are now in Palestinian jails. It seems illogical, in terms of maintaining the jailers’ motivation, to withhold their salaries.

The deterrence in Israel’s step is also dubious. Speaking Wednesday at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University, chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said the PA would never give in to pressure.

One Fatah leader told Haaretz Wednesday, “If there is no diplomatic process and we have no way to pay salaries to the Palestinian forces, we will have to put them on leave.” According to the official, the Israeli move only hastens the political end of PA President Mahmoud Abbas.

Abbas’ hints about dismantling the PA are worn already from overuse, and yet, absurdly, Israel is bringing that eventuality closer by its actions. Without salaries, the PA will be paralyzed. How will that help Israel’s security? Only Netanyahu knows.