Archive for September 28, 2011

Iran begins large-scale production of new cruise missile

September 28, 2011

Iran begins large-scale production of new cruise missile – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

Iran’s growing arsenal raises concerns its missiles could hit targets in the region such as Israel and U.S. military bases in the Gulf.

Iran says it’s started large-scale production of a domestically-developed cruise missile designed for sea-based targets and capable of destroying warships.

Defense Minister Gen. Ahmad Vahidi said an unspecified number of samples of “Ghader,” or “Capable” as the missile is called in Farsi, were delivered to the Revolutionary Guard’s navy, assigned to protect Iran’s sea borders. His remarks were reported by state TV on Wednesday.

Iran - Reuters - august 2011 Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks as he stands next to the Iranian-made new generation long range Cruise missile in Tehran August 23, 2011.
Photo by: Reuters

The cruise missile has a range of 124 miles (200 kilometers). It can reportedly travel at low altitudes and has a lighter weight and smaller dimensions.

Iran’s growing arsenal is raising concerns, including its short and medium range ballistic missiles capable of hitting targets in the region such as Israel and U.S. military bases in the Gulf.

On Tuesday, the French envoy to the UN warned Iran on that it risks a military strike if it continues to develop its nuclear program. Ambassador Gerard Araud said in New York that “If we don’t succeed today to reach a negotiation with the Iranians, there is a strong risk of military action,” AFP reported.

The strike, he said, “would be a very complicated operation. It would have disastrous consequences in the region… all the Arab countries are extremely worried about what is happening.”

France: Iran faces high risk of military strike. Russia practices Iranian reprisal

September 28, 2011

DEBKAfile, Political Analysis, Espionage, Terrorism, Security.

DEBKAfile Special Report September 28, 2011, 2:03 PM (GMT+02:00)

Russian-Central Asian armies exercise defense of US Caspian oil fields

France’s UN Ambassador Gerard Araud warned Wednesday, Sept. 28 that Iran runs a high risk of a military strike if it continues on the path to nuclear proliferation. “Some countries won’t accept the prospect of Tehran reaching the threshold of nuclear armament,” he said. “Personally I am convinced that it would be a very complicated operation …with disastrous consequences in the region.”
Ambassador Araud’s comment confirmed reports from debkafile‘s military sources in recent months that US and European sanctions against Iran had been ineffectual and the ayatollahs had no intention of slowing down on their drive for a nuclear weapon.
The French diplomat was not the only one to raise the alarm this week about regional war clouds circling over Iran.
Sept. 9-26, the Russian army, joined by Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, deployed 12,000 troops in a huge combined military exercise code-named Center-2011 which simulated an Iranian attack on Caspian oil fields operated by American firms in reprisal for a US strike against Iranian nuclear sites.

Russian intelligence postulated an instantaneous Iranian reprisal for this strike and based the war game staged by Russian-led Collective Rapid Force and the Collective Rapid Deployment Forces of the Central Asian Region –CSTO – on this assumption.
Our military sources disclose that the forces taking part in the exercise were briefed for a two-stage scenario:
Stage One: An naval attack on the Caspian Sea coast coming from the south (Iran).
Stage Two: A large-scale air and ground attack from the south by 70 F-4 and F-5 fighter-bombers, namely, the bulk of Iran’s air force, along with armored divisions, marine battalions and infantry brigades landing on the northern and eastern shores of the Caspian Sea.
The Russian briefing conjectured that the Iranian offensive would single out the Kazakh oil field at Mangustan on the Caspian coast, a field which debkafile reports Exxon Mobile is operating.

Moscow clearly attached the highest importance to the exercise and extreme credibility to the hypothetical scenario. Russian chief of staff Gen. Nikolai Makarov personally commanded the drills and on Monday, Sept. 26, President Dmitry Medvedev toured the field commands and units.

Tehran was not idle: Tuesday, the day before the war game ended, Adm. Habibollah Sayyari, commander of the Iranian Navy, stated that  Iranian warships would be deployed “close to US territorial waters,” since the Islamic Republic of Iran considers the US presence in the Persian Gulf “illegitimate and makes no sense.”

After Tehran rejected a recent US request to establish a “red phone” link between the countries to avoid unwanted confrontation between their armed forces in the Gulf region, Ali Fadavi, Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) Navy chief, commented enigmatically: “When we are in the Gulf of Mexico, we will establish direct contact with the United States.”

A significant remark on the intentions of another nuclear rogue government came from Peter Hughes, the British Ambassador to North Korea, when he stopped over in Seoul on his way home from a three-year tenure in Pyongyang.
“I have had discussions with high-level officials, who have made clear to me their view that if Colonel Qaddafi had not given up his nuclear weapons, then NATO would not have attacked his country,” he said.

The ambassador therefore held out little hope of the long-stalled US-South Korea talks with the North resumed lately getting anywhere on Pyongyang’s denuclearization.

All these ominous events – pointed comments by French and British diplomats and the large-scale Russian-Central Asian war game – add up to widespread skepticism about any chance of halting Iran’s race for a nuclear weapon or disarming North Korea.

An Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear plant will be costly, even with Obama’s bunker-busting bombs

September 28, 2011

Crispin Black: An Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear plant will be costly, even with Obama’s bunker-busting bombs | News & Politics | News & Comment | The First Post.

Benyamin Netanyahu Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Crispin Black:

Obama’s bunker-busters will not be enough to deal with the centrifuges’ hiding place
LAST UPDATED 7:54 AM,
SEPTEMBER 28, 2011

IF IT’S TRUE that Iran is just six months away from producing a nuclear weapon with enriched uranium from its IR-2 centrifuges, then we may just be weeks away from an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear installations.

According to what looks like a deliberate leak from the US government, President Obama agreed in 2009 to the delivery of fifty-five GBU-28 (Guided Bomb Unit) bunker-busting bombs to the Israeli air force.

Some have seen the revelation through a political prism – the Obama administration is polishing its pro-Israeli credentials in the run-up to the presidential election in just over a year’s time. Others have detected sabre-rattling, a warning to the mullahs that the US is prepared to support military action by Israel. There is something in both.

The GBU-28 is an impressive weapon, initially improvised in the First Gulf War to attack Saddam Hussein’s underground command bunkers. In its first test it embedded itself 100 feet into the Nevada Desert. It would have made mincemeat of Hitler in his Fuhrerbunker (26ft underground with a further 1 ft of concrete) and was instrumental in forcing Saddam Hussein’s retreat from Kuwait in 1991.

There is just one snag. In August the Iranian nuclear energy chief, Fereidoun Abbasi, revealed on state television that the centrifuges have been transferred from Natanz (central Iran) to the Fordo facility (from the name of the nearest village) near the city of Qom. They are now not just buried beneath the ground, but dug into the side of a bareback mountain.

In satellite photographs the set-up looks remarkably similar to the North American Air Defence (NORAD) command centre at Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado, buried more than a mile inside the Rockies.

Iranian military engineers have a good record in both concealment and digging. Their expertise was particularly useful to Hezbollah in southern Lebanon in the 2006 war with Israel. So there is reason to believe that the Fordo installation has been properly built.

The current in-service GBU-28 is an improvement on the first version of 20 years ago. Its penetrative power has doubled to 200ft and it is packed full of clever electronics to find its target accurately.

Unfortunately, the weapon has two major drawbacks for attacking Fordo. It can penetrate a mixture of sand, earth and steel effectively, but it is not designed to chew through solid rock.

Also, it can be dropped with reasonable accuracy from the air. But for the kind of bulls-eye required to get the bomb into a tunnel or air vent the target has to be designated by laser from the ground. Even then the GU-28 is unlikely to be a showstopper. State-of-the-art bunkers are designed to channel blast away from vital areas.

This is going to be difficult. The perimeter of the area is secured by elite and aggressive units of the Revolutionary Guard. The mountains offer little cover. There is little chance of a few Israeli commandos being covertly inserted – even Andy McNab would struggle to carry out the mission.

But from the Israelis’ point of view, an Iranian nuke, however crude, poses an existential threat to the State of Israel. Their military and intelligence planners will be prepared both to accept more risk to their own side and inflict more damage on the opposition.

Mossad and the CIA will have worked up the basic lay out, defences and security routine at the plant from various intelligence sources including the visit of International Atomic Energy Authority officials to the site in July.

If bombs alone won’t do the job what are the other options? American and Israeli planners could do worse than arrange a screening of The Heroes of Telemark, the 1965 film depicting the Norwegian Resistance attack on the Norsk Hydro heavy water plant, vital to the fledgling Nazi atom bomb programme.

The RAF had repeatedly tried to bomb the plant built into the side of a steep valley without success. The only other realistic option was a commando attack against heavy German defences which duly went ahead. Kirk Douglas and Richard Harris played the Resistance leaders superbly.

Back to Fordo. Air power will be useful. But if the Israelis want to destroy the Iranian facility they are going to have to raid it with a substantial military force – overwhelm the Revolutionary Guards with firepower. They will have to gain access to key parts of the installation and destroy them. Not just boots on the ground but boots underground. It can be done. But it will be costly.

Violent crackdown by Syrian forces leave 69 people dead in five days

September 28, 2011

Violent crackdown by Syrian forces leave 69 people dead in five days.

Al Arabiya

Violent crackdown by Syrian forces leave 69 people dead in five days

As many as 69 people were killed last week during the ongoing crackdown on protests against President Bashar al-Assad’s government. (Photo by Reuters)

As many as 69 people were killed last week during the ongoing crackdown on protests against President Bashar al-Assad’s government. (Photo by Reuters)

Syrian security forces killed up to 69 people in the past five days as part of a crackdown on protests against President Bashar al-Assad’s government, activists said.

Rights groups said that the violence on the ground was continuing.
At least 15 people were killed on Tuesday in the central governorates of Homs and Hama, the northern province of Idlib and in the southern area of Deraa, where the uprising against Assad began in March, they said.

“Three civilians were killed and seven others were injured during an assault by the army and security agents against the Homs district of Bayada,” the London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said, according to AFP.

The attack came after soldiers who had abandoned the government forces burned a tank in the area, the rights group said.

Government forces killed two civilians during raids in the northern town of Jabal al-Zawiya, and another civilian was killed and five wounded in a dawn operation in southern Deraa province.

Powerful guns, some mounted on tanks, were used on people in Rastan, Talbisseh and Tir Maala, all in central Homs province, the Observatory added.

“At least 20 people were wounded, seven seriously, when soldiers using heavy machine guns on tanks began to open fire at sunrise in Rastan,” it said.

The Local Coordination Committees, which organize protests on the ground, reported a “massive deployment” of security forces in Rastan.

The protests are part of the wave of unrest across the Middle East and North Africa that unseated governments in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. Assad’s crackdown has left more than 3,600 civilians dead, according to Ammar Qurabi of the National Organization for Human Rights in Syria. About 30,000 people have been detained and 13,000 are still being held, according to Qurabi.

The U.S. and European Union have imposed sanctions, including bans on oil exports, and called on Assad to cede power. They dropped efforts to impose United Nations sanctions in order to win votes for a Security Council resolution condemning the repression, a draft of which is due to be circulated on Wednesday. The government says its foreign enemies helped instigate the unrest.

In a blog he launched on Tuesday, British ambassador to Damascus Simon Collis said Assad’s regime saw “only one way out — the return to authoritarian rule where fear surpasses a desire for freedom.”

“This is a regime that remains determined to control every significant aspect of political life in Syria,” Collis wrote.

“It is used to power. And it will do anything to keep it.”

On Monday, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem, speaking at the annual U.N. General Assembly, accused foreign governments of trying to undermine the co-existence among Syria’s different religious groups.

Anti-regime protests had become a “pretext for foreign interventions,” he added.

Damascus does not accept the existence of popular opposition to the authorities, instead blaming “armed gangs” and “terrorists” for trying to sow chaos.

But U.S. State Department spokesman Mark Toner said: “I would say that the opposition’s shown extraordinary restraint in the face of the regime’s brutality and demanding their rights through peaceful unarmed demonstrations.”

“It goes without saying that the longer the regime continues to repress, kill and jail these peaceful activists, the more likely that this peaceful movement’s going to become violent.”

The opposition Syrian National Council meanwhile announced plans to meet in Istanbul this weekend to try to unify the fragmented coalition.

“We will meet on Oct. 1 and 2, in principle in Istanbul,” spokeswoman Bassma Kodmani told AFP. “Then we will talk about setting up committees.”

The council, which was set up in August, consists of 140 people. Half of them live in Syria and their names have not been made public for security reasons.

In New York, Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi urged the global community to “handle the Syrian issue in a prudent way so as to prevent further turbulence in Syria and its repercussions on regional peace.”

China has joined Russia in opposing sanctions against Syria.

 

Iran says could deploy navy near U.S. coast – report | Reuters

September 28, 2011

Iran says could deploy navy near U.S. coast – report | Reuters.

(Reuters) – Iran raised the prospect on Tuesday of sending military ships close to the United States’ Atlantic coast, in what would be a major escalation of tensions between the long-standing adversaries.

“Like the arrogant powers that are present near our marine borders, we will also have a powerful presence close to American marine borders,” the head of the Navy, Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari said, according to the official IRNA news agency.

Speaking at a ceremony marking the 31st anniversary of the start of the 1980-1988 war with Iraq, Sayyari gave no details of when such a deployment could happen or the number or type of vessels to be used.

The declaration comes just weeks after Turkey said it would host a NATO early warning radar system which will help spot missile threats from outside Europe, including potentially from Iran. The decision has angered Tehran which had enjoyed close relations with Ankara.

And it comes a few months after Iran sent warships through the Suez canal, after the fall of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, the first time the Islamic Republic had deployed navy vessels in the Mediterranean.

The United States and Israel have not ruled out military action against Iran if diplomacy fails to stop it getting nuclear weapons. Tehran denies it is developing nuclear arms saying its atomic programme is for purely peaceful purposes.

Iran has dismissed the threats, warning that it will respond by hitting U.S. interests in the Gulf and Israel if any such attack happened.

Analysts say Tehran could retaliate by launching hit-and-run strikes in the Gulf and by closing the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway where about 40 percent of all traded oil passes.

The Islamic state often launches military drills in the country to display its military capabilities amid persistent speculation about a possible U.S. or Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

(Writing by Hashem Kalantari; Editing by Rosalind Russell)

EU leaders drop call for Syria sanctions

September 28, 2011

EU leaders drop call for Syria sanctions – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Following veto threats from China and Russia, Western powers withdraw demands for immediate UN punitive action against Damascus

AFP

Published: 09.28.11, 08:59 / Israel News
Western powers dropped calls for immediate sanctions against Syriaat the UN Security Council in the face of veto threats from China and Russia, as activists reported more Syrian civilian deaths. 

A new draft resolution drawn up by Britain, France, Germany and Portugal, with US backing, a copy of which was obtained by AFP on Tuesday, threatens to adopt sanctions if the deadly crackdown by Syrian security forces does not end.

 

The formulation was aimed at overcoming opposition from Russia and China, who have threatened to veto any sanctions resolution brought to the council, which has so far only agreed one statement on the crackdown since mid-March.

 

“There is a need for a strong Security Council response to the repression,” said one European diplomat explaining the resolution. 

“There are hopes that this resolution can quickly get a majority in favor on the council,” said a diplomat from a second council member. 

Rights groups said that the violence on the ground was continuing. 

Syrian forces killed at least six civilians in raids on dissidents Tuesday, the London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said. 

“Three civilians were killed and seven others were injured during an assault by the army and security agents against the Homs district of Bayada,” it said. 

The attack came after soldiers who had abandoned the government forces burned a tank in the area, the rights group said. 

Government forces killed two civilians during raids in the northern town of Jabal al-Zawiya, and another civilian was killed and five wounded in a dawn operation in southern Daraa province, where the protests began in mid-March. 

Powerful guns, some mounted on tanks, were used on people in Rastan, Talbisseh and Tir Maala, all in central Homs province, the Observatory added. 

“At least 20 people were wounded, seven seriously, when soldiers using heavy machine guns on tanks began to open fire at sunrise in Rastan,” it said. 

The Local Coordination Committees, which organize protests on the ground, reported a “massive deployment” of security forces in Rastan. 

‘Syrian regime used to power’

In a blog he launched on Tuesday, British ambassador to Damascus Simon Collis said Bashar Assad‘s regime saw “only one way out – the return to authoritarian rule where fear surpasses a desire for freedom. 

“This is a regime that remains determined to control every significant aspect of political life in Syria,” Collis wrote. 

“It is used to power. And it will do anything to keep it.” 

On Monday, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem, speaking at the annual UN General Assembly, accused foreign governments of trying to undermine the co-existence among Syria’s different religious groups. 

“How can we otherwise explain media provocations, financing and arming religious extremism?” he asked. 

“What purpose could this serve other than total chaos that would dismember Syria – and consequently adversely affect its neighbors?” 

Anti-regime protests in which at least 2,700 people had been killed had become a “pretext for foreign interventions,” he added. 

Damascus does not accept the existence of popular opposition to the authorities, instead blaming “armed gangs” and “terrorists” for trying to sow chaos. 

But US State Department spokesman Mark Toner said, “I would say that the opposition’s shown extraordinary restraint in the face of the regime’s brutality and demanding their rights through peaceful unarmed demonstrations. 

“It goes without saying that the longer the regime continues to repress, kill and jail these peaceful activists, the more likely that this peaceful movement’s going to become violent.” 

The opposition Syrian National Council meanwhile announced plans to meet in Istanbul this weekend to try to unify the fragmented coalition. 

“We will meet on October 1 and 2, in principle in Istanbul,” spokeswoman Bassma Kodmani told AFP. “Then we will talk about setting up committees.” 

The council, which was set up in August, consists of 140 people. Half of them live in Syria and their names have not been made public for security reasons. 

In New York, Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi urged the global community to “handle the Syrian issue in a prudent way so as to prevent further turbulence in Syria and its repercussions on regional peace.” 

China has joined Russia in opposing sanctions against Syria. 

“We hope that parties in Syria will exercise restraint, avoid any form of violence or more bloodshed and conflict, and act quickly to ease tension,” Uang added. 

His speech followed a meeting with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who urged China to back strong UN action on Syria, a senior US official said.

‘French UN envoy warns of ‘strong’ risk of strike on Iran’

September 28, 2011

‘French UN envoy warns of ‘stron… JPost – Iranian Threat – News.

    French Ambassador to the United Nations Gerard Araud warned of a “strong” risk of a military strike on Iran if it proceeds on the path to nuclear proliferation, AFP reported on Wednesday.

“If we don’t succeed today to reach a negotiation with the Iranians, there is a strong risk of military action,” AFP quoted the French envoy as saying in a New York panel discussion.

Araud added that he is convinced “some countries won’t accept [the] prospect” of the Islamic Republic reaching the threshold of nuclear armament, according to the report.

Several days ago, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov called on Iran to take a first step and “freez[e] the production of centrifuges,” saying that such a step would prevent fresh sanctions against it.

If Iran makes that first step, Lavrov said in a CNN interview Sunday, Russia won’t “adopt new sanctions, neither in the Security Council nor unilaterally.”

Saying that the only way to resolve the Iranian nuclear issue is through negotiations, he added, “I believe that if Iran gets a very clear message [that this] is not about regime change but about non-proliferation issues, I believe we have a chance to start these serious discussions.”

Meanwhile, US Defense Secretary Leon was expected to arrive in Israel for talks with counterpart Defense Minister Ehud Barak, talks which were expected to include the Iranian nuclear threat.

The end of Ahmadinejad. His cronies barred from election

September 28, 2011

DEBKAfile, Political Analysis, Espionage, Terrorism, Security.

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report September 27, 2011, 6:03 PM (GMT+02:00)

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – The end

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the driving force behind Iran’s nuclear program and the most vocal of Israel’s enemies, is on his last legs as president. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has stripped him of most of his powers and shut the door against his having any political future.
debkafile‘s Iranian sources report his loyalists have been deserting him in droves since he went to New York to deliver an address to the UN General Assembly on Sept. 23. The Supreme Leader used his absence for the coup de grace: The removal of the president’s loyalists from the list of 4,000 contenders running for seats in parliament (the Majlis) next March.

That was easily arranged: Khameini handed his orders to Ayatollah Mohammad Kani, head of the Assembly of Experts, which In the Islamic Republic of Iran is responsible for screening all contenders for office. He was told to disqualify all the president’s associates. So, in the next Majlis, Ahmadinejad will be shorn of a loyal faction and any buddies sticking to him when his second presidential term runs out in May 2013 will be out of a job.

The Supreme Ruler degraded the president very publicly with one humiliation after another.

He waited for Ahmadinejad to go on the air in a US NBC interview on Sept. 13 to promise the release of Josh Fattal and Shane Bauer, the two American hikers convicted of spying, before cutting him down by suspending their release until the Iranian president was being booed by protesters in New York for reneging on his promise.
Tehran’s political, religious and military insiders were not surprised by his downfall, our Iranian sources report. For some time he had been getting too big for his boots, accumulating more powers than any president before him and only getting away with it so long as he was Khamenei’s fair-haired boy.

But then, the favorite, whose election in 2005 and reelection in 2009, Khamenei engineered at the cost of violent anti-government protests in Tehran, rewarded him with ingratitude. He increasingly flouted the master and in some cases began chipping away at his authority – until Khamenei had had enough and decided to reel him in.

At the last minute, he cancelled a live Ahmadinejad interview on Iran’s second television network wide publicized for the eve of his departure to the United Nations.
The affronts followed him home to Tehran, where waiting for him were serious criminal charges linking his name to the disappearance of three billion dollars from Iranian banks. The name of the embezzler has not been released but our sources in Tehran reveal him as Amir Mansour Arya, an entrepreneur who started a business five years ago with Ahmadinejad’s encouragement and whose fortune grew a thousand fold within a suspiciously short time.
Arya is accused of using his presidential connections to secure multi-billion dollar loans from Iranian banks and then spiriting large sums out of the country.

Ahmadinejad denies any complicity in the crime. He tried fighting back by threatening to publish within 15 days “dozens of names” of rivals he claims are guilty of financial crimes. The deadline came and went without publication.

The betting in Tehran is that the Supreme Leader will not actually sack Ahmadinejad but let him last out his term as yesterday’s man,  lame duck in political isolation.
debkafile‘s Iranian sources: Two frontrunners for future president most mentioned recently are two hardliners, Majils (legislature) Speaker Ali Larijani, a former senior nuclear negotiator with the West, and ex-foreign minister Ali Akhbar Veliyati, who is a member of Khamenei’s kitchen cabinet as senior adviser on international relations.