Archive for April 2011

Spying for Iran in Bahrain

April 27, 2011

Spying for Iran in Bahrain.

Bahrain's Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa. (File photo)

Bahrain’s Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa. (File photo)

Bahrain declared a diplomat posted in the Iranian embassy in Manama persona non grata, and ordered him to leave within 72 hours due to his alleged links with a Kuwait spy ring, Bahrain’s official news agency reported on Tuesday.

The BNA report identified the official as Hujatullah Rahmani and said Iran’s charge d’affaires in Bahrain was summoned on Monday to the foreign ministry where the decision had been conveyed to him.

The Bahrain government said in a confidential report to the United Nations said the militant group Hezbollah, Iran’s ally, was actively plotting with the opposition in Bahrain to overthrow the country’s ruling family. Bahrain has long claimed that Iran and Hezbollah have sought to fuel instability in the nation.

According to Al Arabiya’s correspondent at UN headquarters in New York, the report says: “Evidence confirms that Bahraini elements are being trained in Hezbollah camps specifically established to train assets from the Gulf.”

In the report, which was sent to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon of the United Nations, Bahrain’s government said that Iranian-backed Hezbollah operatives had been training opposition figures at camps in Lebanon and Iran in an effort to destabilize the Khalifa monarchy.
The report also said the militant group has trained militants for activities in neighboring Gulf countries, according to diplomats who have reviewed it.

Earlier this month, Iranian state television said three of Tehran’s diplomats and an embassy employee were expelled from Kuwait for alleged links to a spy ring working for Tehran. They reportedly had spied for Iran since the Allied invasion of Iraq.

Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammad Sabah al-Salem al-Sabah of Kuwait later charged that the diplomats had proven links to a suspected spy ring, three members of which a Kuwaiti court condemned to death on March 29, according to Agence-France Presse.

The expulsions come at a time of heightened tensions between Gulf Arab states and their Iranian neighbor across the water. In addition to Kuwaiti allegations of Iranian spying, Bahrain has also accused Iran of meddling in its domestic affairs.

The March 14 intervention of a Saudi-led Gulf force in Bahrain aimed at quelling the protest movement in the only Shiite-majority Arab state of the Gulf. The move was condemned by Iran, and sparked a war of words between Shiite Iran and its Arab neighbors.

The population of Bahrain is estimated at 1.2 million and it has been ruled by the Sunni monarchy for more than 200 years.

Last Wednesday, Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahayan of the United Arab Emirates told a news conference in Abu Dhabi that “Iran should reconsider its policies in the region and should respect the unity and sovereignty of Gulf countries and do not interfere in their domestic affairs.”

Strains in relations across the Gulf date back to the 1980s when the Arab states, notably Saudi Arabia, backed Saddam Hussein’s Iraq in an eight-year war against Iran.

The GCC has more recently voiced concern over Tehran’s alleged ambitions for regional dominance and its nuclear program.

(Abeer Tayel of Al Arabiya can be reached at: abeer.tayel@mbc.net and Ammar Benaziz, also of Al Arabiya can be reached at: ammar.benaziz@mbc.net)

Obama, Abu Dhabi crown prince meet to discuss differences over Iran

April 27, 2011

Obama, Abu Dhabi crown prince meet to discuss differences over Iran.

President Barack Obama during his meeting with Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed. (File photo)

President Barack Obama during his meeting with Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed. (File photo)

President Barak Obama of the United States met Tuesday with Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the United Arab Emirates Armed Forces.

The meeting, which was held in the Oval Office, was closed to the press. The White House released a vaguely worded statement afterward saying the meeting between the two leaders was productive and covered “wide-ranging discussion which focused on our common strategic interests in the region” and that it emphasized the importance of “continued close consultations” between the two countries.

The crown prince also met earlier with homeland security adviser Janet Napolitano and defense secretary Robert Gates to discuss military and security cooperation.

According to the official Emirati news agency, the leaders “discussed the strong and broad-based relationship that unites the two countries, and pledged to continue the close cooperation in the areas of security and commercial activity.”

The meeting comes after National Security Adviser Tom Donilon’s April 13 consultations with the crown prince in Abu Dhabi and at a time when the two countries are not in agreement on several regional issues, principally Iran.

“I think having heard unsatisfactory answers from defense secretary Robert Gates and Centcom commander Gen. James Mattis, the crown prince has come here to try and convince the president himself of what he thinks should be done in regards to Iran,” said Simon Henderson, a regional expert at the Washington Institute for Middle East Policy, referring to earlier meetings in the region.

“The UAE thinks that the US doesn’t take Iran seriously. From the UAE perspective Iran is the major problem in the region and it needs to be countered, whereas the US thinks that greater political freedoms are the issues to focus on,” he said.

The UAE and several Gulf countries also believe the US is applying a double standard in the region, calling on those governments to open up politically while not applying the same standard to Iran, and overlooking the protests that happened after the 2009 Iranian elections.

Gulf countries, including the UAE, were also shocked at how quickly the US abandoned its long time ally Hosni Mubarak during the Egyptian uprisings.

Differences over the UAE’s involvement in Bahrain are also a point of contention: The US would like to see the UAE and Saudi pull their troops out from the tiny island state, whereas the UAE’s anger over harsh criticism levied by the administration against the Bahraini government led to a delay in its military involvement in NATO strikes on Libya.

The UAE and Qatar are the only two Arab countries currently involved in the fighting. Their participation was central to the US’s desire to make the coalition more multilateral and to obtain Arab cover for their efforts.

At the same time the UAE is being criticized by human rights organizations based in the US for arresting civil society activists and cracking down on dissent in a country that does not face unrest.

But the despite the tensions, the two countries have very close ties which may not be threatened by the recent events, says David Mack, a former US ambassador who served in the UAE,

“They appreciate fact that we have close relationship with the Egyptian military, and that the UAE is one of the most important trade partners of the US in the Middle East,” Mr. Mack said.

But Iran remains a contentious topic.

“UAE leaders fear that this US administration is ready to live with a nuclear Iran,” Mr. Henderson said.

(Muna Shikaki is a correspondent for Al Arabiya in Washington, D.C. You can follow her on Twitter @munashik)

Despite Reports of Brutality Toward Civilians, Syria to Join U.N.’s Human Rights Council – FoxNews.com

April 27, 2011

Despite Reports of Brutality Toward Civilians, Syria to Join U.N.’s Human Rights Council – FoxNews.com.

The brutal crackdown by Syrian President Bashar Assad may finally be getting the attention of world leaders — but apparently not enough to stop Syria from becoming the newest member of the U.N. Human Rights Council.

And despite calling for an independent investigation into the crackdown, which has left hundreds dead, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon apparently won’t do much about blocking Syria’s path to the human rights group.

“That’s not really for the secretary general to suggest to a member state,”  said Martin Nesirky, a spokesman for the secretary-general, when asked if the U.N. chief would ask Syria to drop out of the running for the post. When asked if Ban had brought up the point during his telephone conversation April 9 with Assad, Nesirsky told Fox News, “that’s not really something the secretary general would raise specifically, because it’s for other member states to decide on the membership of the Human Rights Council.”

Ammar Abdulhamid, a Syrian human rights activist based in Washington, called on the secretary-general “to have a greater sense of decency and courage, and to realize that his position gives him a certain moral authority and puts him exactly in the position to tell the Assads that their candidacy at this stage is unwelcome.” Abdulhamid was forced to flee Syria in 2005 following criticism of the Assad regime, and still finds himself under attack by the regime. His website was recently hacked and now posts the latest videos and news on his blog (http://syrianrevolutiondigest.blogspot.com).

A State Department spokesman last week said the U.S. would oppose Syria’s bid to the Human Rights Council, calling it “inappropriate and hypocritical.” But it would seem Syria is virtually guaranteed a seat, having been selected as one of four candidates for the Asian bloc.

While no Asian state is known to be looking to challenge Syria, Rupert Colville, the spokesperson for the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, told Fox News that, “clearly it’s an issue being discussed among the States and obviously depends on whether other countries in the Asian group put themselves up as a candidate.” Asked if the U.N.’s Human Rights supremo, who has condemned the violence in Syria, would get involved, he echoed the words of Ban Ki-moon’s spokesman, telling Fox News: “It’s a matter for the States.”

Anne Bayefsky, a senior fellow with the Hudson Institute and an expert on Human Rights issues at the U.N., tells Fox News that “Syria knows a good deal when it sees it and the like-minded countries in the Asian regional group that nominated Syria are just as enthusiastic about the U.N.’s idea of a “human rights” body. So the question for the Obama administration is not how do we keep Syria out, but why is the United States in?” She believes that the administration is working hard to keep Syria from gaining a seat “but for all the wrong reasons — namely, to save the spectacle of an American foreign policy outsourced to the U.N.”

Requests for comment from both the Syrian spokesman at their D.C. embassy and their U.N. ambassador went unanswered. However, as a prerequisite for membership to the Human Rights Council, countries are asked to fill out a Human Rights pledge. This is some of Syria’s pledge:(http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/65/784) “Syria’s candidature to the Human Rights Council signifies its commitment to respect and to support the inalienable and indivisible nature of all human rights, both on the national and international levels. Syria believes that its membership of the Human Rights Council would contribute toward enriching the quality of dialogue, cooperation and action aimed at promotion and protection of human rights for all peoples.”

Abulhamid, who runs the non-profit Tharwa Foundation, which is dedicated to promoting democracy in the Middle East and North Africa, tells Fox News that “it’s absolutely disgusting,” that just as the Syrian leadership goes on “a murderous rampage” through Syria that it is being considered for membership to the council. He tells Fox News: “We hope that there is still a way to avert this tragic situation.”

Bayefsky, who also edits eyeontheun.org. isn’t so hopeful. “The secretary-general is focused on securing his reappointment. He doesn’t have time for protecting human rights, at least when it runs the risk of offending potential supporters among the 56 state members of the Organization of the Islamic Conference,” she says.

The vote takes place on May 20 at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

Syrian opposition ask world’s help to stop Assad

April 27, 2011

Syrian opposition ask world’s help to stop Assad – Israel News, Ynetnews.

Damascus opposition members plead with West to pressure regime into ceasing brutal crackdown on protesters. US, UK say military response in Libya does not dictate similar action in Syria

News agencies

Members of the Syrian opposition meeting in Istanbul on Tuesday pleaded for international help to persuade President Bashar Assad to halt a brutal crackdown on a popular revolt.

“Our friends in the West, in Turkey, in the Arab world, if they want to help us, then they can do that by… putting the clearest possible pressure on the Syrian regime to stop targeting civilians,” Anas Abdah, the British-based chairman of the Movement for Justice and Development, told Reuters.

Abdah was speaking on the sidelines of a gathering of opposition and rights groups organized by Turkish non-government organizations to highlight the Syrian people’s plight.

“It looks like Bashar al-Assad has taken a strategic decision to crush a non-violent movement in Syria by ordering his brother Maher al-Assad… to go and storm Deraa city,” Abdah said.

Funeral for victims killed by Syrian security forces (Photo: AFP)

Double standard?

Meanwhile, both the US and British defense chiefs dismissed the notion that because the international community responded to unrest in Libya with military force, the same should be done in Syria.

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates met Tuesday with his British counterpart Liam Fox, after which Fox said that the world’s response to popular revolts across the Middle East and North Africa “must be tailored to the circumstances of each case.”

In a joint appearance with Fox at the Pentagon, Gates made a similar point, noting that before the military campaign in Libya was launched, there was a diplomatic process that resulted in calls for action by the Arab League, the Gulf Cooperation Council and the United Nations.

Other Washington officials said that |at this time” the United States still prefers to exhaust diplomacy and possible sanctions against Syria.

“Our focus is… with respect to options in Syria, in the diplomatic and financial space at the moment,” said Jacob Sullivan, director for strategic policy and a close advisor to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“At the moment, we’re not actively considering shutting down our embassy in Syria,” said Sullivan. “We believe that our diplomatic lines of communication there offer an opportunity to communicate directly with the Syrian government in ways that we would like to continue to do.”

Sullivan reiterated that the United States condemns the repression in Syria, saying the actions taken by Assad “are totally unacceptable” and “completely inconsistent” with those of a responsible leader.

The US, he concluded, “Will evaluate the effectiveness and benefits of the tools at our disposal,” before making any further decisions.

As for the situation in Libya, Gates said that there had been some “momentum” in the Libyan conflict in recent days, but stressed that NATO forces were not targeting Moamar Gaddafi specifically.

The comments come after Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin accused the coalition of exceeding its UN mandate to protect civilians, saying attacks on Gaddafi’s palaces indicate the aim was to kill the Libyan leader.

Putin accused the nations taking part in the Nato-led operation of straying from the UN mandate to enforce a no-fly zone and protect civilians.

AP, AFP and Reuters contributed to this report

Assad’s fall would be welcome

April 27, 2011

Assad’s fall would be welcome.


The ouster of the Syrian president would significantly improve Israel’s strategic situation.

  Three months ago, the January 25 revolution broke out in Egypt. Since then, the flames of revolt burning across Arab capitals have refused to die out. Ousted Tunisian president Zine al-Abedine Ben Ali fled his country’s civilian protests and found refuge in the bosom of the Saudi royal family. Egypt’s deposed president Hosni Mubarak, forced to transfer rule to the military, is currently hopping between police investigators and the emergency room. Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi is leading a fight for survival in his country against the rebels who are reinforced by NATO air raids which almost certainly guarantee a future victory. In Syria, Bahrain, Yemen and Jordan, as well, tensions continue to rise. The effects of the volcano that erupted some 90 days ago, are still felt in Middle Eastern cities.

Events in Syria will have a more decisive impact than those in any other Arab country. While the implications of the turbulence in Egypt over the peace treaty with Israel should not be taken lightly, it is too early to tell where Cairo is heading. The military establishment has not transferred its rule and its connection to the West remains firm and authentic. It is very possible that Mubarak’s exit from the political stage will be a catalyst for further consolidation of this culture of political democratization, but will not lead to a change in political orientation. Meanwhile, the fall of Bashar Assad’s regime would result in dramatic regional change. Unlike many respected commentators, I believe that such a development would significantly improve Israel’s strategic situation.

CONCERN OVER the collapse of the Alawite minority rule is based on our longstanding truce with Syria, in place since 1973. I disagree with the approach that praises Assad for the quiet Israel-Syria border.

Although he has adhered to the restraint practiced by his late father, former president Hafez Assad, with respect to maintaining agreements such as the ceasefire in the Golan Heights, in many other areas he has led an adventurous policy which has placed him in direct confrontation with Israel. The calm northern border has provided him with a cover for militant, aggressive, and frustratingly effective activity on various fronts and against Israel’s interests.

Syria, via its proxies, spilled IDF blood in Lebanon for three decades. Israel’s forced unilateral withdrawal to the Israeli-Lebanon border was without any real achievement or value. Assad offered a safe haven in Damascus to senior leaders of terrorist organizations and allowed them to continue their terror activities, with unlimited freedom, from his capital.

The Syria-Iran alliance has provided Hamas and its satellites with financial aid, training camps, a supply of modern weapons and political backing. Sponsored by the intimate cooperation between Tehran and Damascus, a fanatic terror kingdom, armed to the teeth, was established on our southern border four years ago, and has since already exacted a tangible price from Israel.

Hezbollah’s success in gaining unprecedented power in Lebanon can also be attributed to the Syrian president’s determination. In past years, Assad consistently rebuffed pressures from the Bush administration and refused to turn his back on Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah, despite threats and sanctions imposed on Syria.

Syria’s enthusiastic support for Hezbollah has turned it into Lebanon’s strongest organization militarily, and the most significant political force in the majority coalition, which is currently trying to establish a new government.

GIVEN THIS background – and we have not even mentioned the reports of Syria’s efforts to acquire nuclear weapons – it is difficult to support any position that allows for the Assad regime’s continued rule.

Those who disagree with an Assad departure are troubled by the possibility that his successors will deviate from the path of restraint that characterized him, and opt for a more provocative policy toward Israel.

The probability of this occurring is minimal, I believe. With citizens’ blood flowing in the streets, it seems more likely that Assad’s successors will first seek to sideline the devoted supporters of the hated duo, Nasrallah and Ahmadinejad. Syria’s opposition, like most of Syrian society, are members of the Sunni community.

If opposition leaders survive the conflict, overcome the current oppressive regime and fill key positions in Syria, they are unlikely to show a surplus of sympathy toward the Shias of Iran and Hezbollah.

To know what would really serves Israel’s interest, we should look toward the Islamic Republic. Nothing currently worries the ayatollahs’ regime more than the loss of Syria as its intimate partner in the “axis of evil.” Iran has invested enormous resources in maintaining this partnership, including a willingness to compromise on its own interests to satisfy Syria’s desires. Syria’s defection from the radical camp into the arms of the pragmatic Arab camp would leave Iran isolated and vulnerable.

Even Hezbollah leaders have recently found it difficult to sleep at night. Who is better aware of the grave impending damage should its extensive connections, carefully cultivated among the Syrian leadership, be severed? Intelligence, logistical and operational assets which have enabled them to maintain a balance of deterrence both against Israel and other power sources in Lebanon may all vanish.

Of course, it would be arrogant to predict at this stage the outcome of the processes of change our neighbors are undergoing. Things are as hopeful as they are dangerous. A positive surprise today can be revealed as a naïve illusion tomorrow.

Nonetheless, history has shown us more than once that events that were at first looked upon as wishful thinking, eventually became a reality. Perhaps at the end of this battle over Syria’s future, it will turn out that, contrary to the gloomy biblical prophecy, it will not be evil that will break forth from the north (Jeremiah 1:14), but rather, a blessing The writer is a former Kadima minister.

Syria says it needs no help in investigation of killings

April 27, 2011

Syria says it needs no help in investigation of killings.

Syrian protesters in Deraa hoisting large flag

  UNITED NATIONS – Syria is perfectly capable of conducting its own transparent inquiry into the deaths of anti-government demonstrators and needs no outside assistance, Syria’s UN envoy said on Tuesday.

“Syria has a government, has a state,” Ambassador Bashar Ja’afari told reporters who asked about a call by UN chief Ban Ki-moon for an investigation. “We can undertake any investigation by our own selves with full transparency.”

“We have nothing to hide,” he said outside the UN Security Council chambers, where members failed to agree on a statement condemning Syria’s government.

“We regret what’s going on, but you should also acknowledge the fact that this unrest and riots, in some of their aspects, have hidden agendas,” he said, adding that some foreign governments were trying to destabilize Syria.

Asked by reporters to name the countries that Damascus believes are behind the unrest, Ja’afari said it was “too early” to provide details.

Ja’afari was speaking as Syrian President Bashar Assad poured troops into a suburb of the capital overnight while his tanks pounded Deraa to crush resistance in the southern city where the revolt against his autocratic rule began on March 18.

White buses brought in hundreds of soldiers in full combat gear into the northern Damascus suburb of Douma, a witness told Reuters on Wednesday, from where pro-democracy protesters have tried to march into centre of the capital in the last two weeks but were met with bullets.

Syrian human rights organization Sawasiah said security forces have killed at least 35 civilians since they entered Deraa at dawn on Monday.

The organization, founded by jailed human rights lawyer Mohannad al-Hassani, said electricity, water and telecommunications remained cut in Deraa and tanks kept firing at residential buildings, with supplies blood at hospitals starting to run low.

At least 400 civilians have been killed by security forces in their campaign to crush the protests, Sawasiah said, adding that the United Nations Security Council must convene to start proceedings against Syrian officials in the International Criminal Court and “rein in the security apparatus”.

The UN secretary-general has called for an independent inquiry into the deaths of people he has described as peaceful demonstrators.

Ja’afari said Assad had instructed the government “to establish a national commission of inquiry and investigation about all the casualties among civilians.”

“We don’t need help from anybody,” he said.

‘Egypt-Israel gas pipeline attacked by armed gang’

April 27, 2011

‘Egypt-Israel gas pipeline attacked by armed gang’.

Flames from February attack on Sinai gas pipeline

  Saboteurs on Wednesday blew up a pipeline running through Egypt’s North Sinai near the town of El-Arish that supplies gas to Israel and Jordan, a security source told Reuters.

“An unknown armed gang attacked the gas pipeline,” the security source said, adding that the flow of gas to Israel and Jordan had been hit.

“Authorities closed the main source of gas supplying the pipeline and are working to extinguish the fire,” the source said, adding there was a tower of flame at the scene.

Last month, six gunmen in Sinai targeted the pipeline, overpowering a guard and planting an explosive device before fleeing.

The explosive device failed to detonate and was eventually defused by soldiers at the gas terminal in the village of el-Sabil near el-Arish.

In March, the Egyptian army deployed hundreds of additional soldiers to the northern Sinai Peninsula to guard the pipeline.

An Israeli defense official said Jerusalem had agreed to the deployment, which followed a February 5 explosion at a gas terminal in the area that disrupted the flow of gas to Israel and Jordan. Security officials said a bomb had caused the blast at the el- Arish terminal, while Egypt’s natural gas company said it had been caused by a gas leak.

The blast and fire at the gas terminal in el-Arish did not cause casualties.

The explosion sent a pillar of flames leaping into the sky, but was a safe distance from the nearest homes, said regional governor Abdel Wahab Mabrouk. He added the fire was brought under control by mid-morning, after valves controlling the flow of gas were closed.

The flow of natural gas from Egypt to Israel and Jordan was cut off until March 16 as a result of the blast. Israel gets 40 percent of its natural gas from Egypt, a deal built on their landmark 1979 peace accord.

On Saturday, Egypt’s public prosecutor ordered former Energy Minister Sameh Fahmy and six other officials to stand trial on charges of squandering public funds related to the natural gas deal with Israel.

The decision, part of a probe on graft during the 30-year-rule of Mubarak, said the deal in question caused Egypt losses worth more than $714 million and enabled a local businessman to make financial profits.


Syrian opposition ask world’s help to stop Assad

April 26, 2011

Syrian opposition ask world’s help to stop Assad – Israel News, Ynetnews.

(Contact your representatives.  This insane butchery of the innocent MUST be stopped… – JW)

Damascus opposition members meet in Istanbul, plead with West to pressure regime into ceasing brutal crackdown on protesters

Reuters

Members of the Syrian opposition meeting in Istanbul on Tuesday pleaded for international help to persuade President Bashar Assad to halt a brutal crackdown on a popular revolt.

“Our friends in the West, in Turkey, in the Arab world, if they want to help us, then they can do that by… putting the clearest possible pressure on the Syrian regime to stop targeting civilians,” Anas Abdah, the British-based chairman of the Movement for Justice and Development, told Reuters.

Abdah was speaking on the sidelines of a gathering of opposition and rights groups organized by Turkish non-government organizations to highlight the Syrian people’s plight.

“It looks like Bashar al-Assad has taken a strategic decision to crush a non-violent movement in Syria by ordering his brother Maher al-Assad… to go and storm Deraa city,” Abdah said.

Earlier, Syrian security forces deployed in the hills around the Banias in preparation for a possible attack on the coastal city to crush a popular uprising, a protest leader said.

“Forces wearing black and carrying AK-47s deployed today in the hills. Armored personnel carriers passed by the highway adjacent to Banias at night,” Anas al-Shaghri told Reuters from Banias, which has seen intensifying pro-democracy protests against the rule of President Bashar al-Assad.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that Damascus security forces have shot dead at least 400 civilians in their campaign to crush the country’s month-long peaceful pro-democracy revolution.

Syria: Tanks deploy outside of Banias as protests intensify

April 26, 2011

Syria: Tanks deploy outside of Banias as protests intensify.

A Syrian protester holds the national flag.

  AMMAN – Syrian protesters in Banias chanted “the people want the overthrow of the regime” on Tuesday as forces deployed around the small coastal city for a possible attack, a rights campaigner in contact with Banias said.

“Our demands are peaceful. If they kill us, our souls will rise from our graves and demand freedom,” Sheikh Anas Airout, a preacher in the city, told 2,000 to 3,000 protesters, according to the rights campaigner.

Syrian security forces have shot dead at least 400 civilians in their campaign to crush month-long pro-democracy protests, Syrian human rights organization Sawasiah said on Tuesday.

The group, founded by jailed human rights lawyer Mohannad al-Hassani, said the UN Security Council must convene to start proceedings against Syrian officials in the International Criminal Court and “reign in the security apparatus.”

“This savage behavior, which is aimed at keeping the ruling clique in power at the expense of a rising number of civilian lives, calls for immediate international action beyond condemnations,” Sawasiah said in a statement sent to Reuters.

“The murderers in the Syrian regime must be held accountable. The rivers of blood spilt by this oppressive regime for the past four decades are enough,” the statement said.

Sawasiah’s board includes Syrian philosophy professor Sadeq Jalal al-Azem, whose book Self-criticism After the Defeat helped set the stage for a revival in Arab political thought after Israel’s victory in the 1967 Middle East War.

Separately, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said security police arrested rights campaigner Qassem al-Ghazzawi on Tuesday in his home city of Deir al-Zor in Syria’s impoverished east after protests intensified in the region last week.

The Observatory also said Mahmoud Issa, a campaigner and former political prisoner arrested last week in the city of Homs, was referred to a military court on Tuesday on charges of “possessing a Thuraya satellite phone and an advanced computer.”

Obama Silent as Syrian Death Toll at 400; Tanks Shoot Civilians

April 26, 2011

Obama Silent as Syrian Death Toll at 400; Tanks Shoot Civilians – Defense/Middle East – Israel News – Israel National News.

Human rights activists estimate that Syrian President Bashar Assad’s force have killed more than 400 protesters as tanks roar through city streets while U.S. President Barack Obama remains relatively silent.

American observers are asking out loud why the voice of Obama President Obama, who turned his back on Mubarak, is barely heard as Assad’s tanks shoot at civilians in Daraa and prepare to enter more towns.

“It’s not yet clear if America wants President Assad to step down,” reported ABC’s Meredith Griffiths. An eyewitness told her that Syrian soldiers and police “won’t even let you get first aid to them and the ambulances; they’re being shot at by security police.”

Meanwhile, Britain, France, Germany and Portugal are seeking a United Nations Security Council condemnation of the violence and an independent investigation of the brute force that has more than matched the killing of opponents to ousted Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak earlier this year.

The Obama administration, which last month called Assad a “reformer” and has tried to “engage” Syria away from Iran, has said only, “We continue to look for ways and are pursuing a range of possible policy options, including targeted sanctions, to respond to the crackdown in Syria.” However, American sanctions on Syria already have been in place for several years.

President Obama has relied on rhetoric, after weeks of relative silence. He said on Friday, “The United States has repeatedly encouraged President Assad and the Syrian government to implement meaningful reforms, but they refuse to respect the rights of the Syrian people or be responsive to their aspirations.”

“As the casualties mount, liberals in America are wondering where their champion of human rights, President Obama, has disappeared to,”wrote Stephen Brown for FrontPage Magazine. “He was front and center in the Egyptian crisis, and even sent American warplanes to bomb the murderous dictatorship in Libya. But so far in Syria, Obama has only condemned the violence in conjunction with other world leaders, calling the Assad regime’s actions ‘“outrageous.’

“But why such a milquetoast response to the client regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran, a world sponsor of terror? Why are Egyptian allies (Mubarak) and Libyan gadflies (Gaddafi) treated more aggressively, and more swiftly than a regime, whose fall might actually benefit American interests?

Even the Washington Post, normally friendly to the president but increasingly critical of his Middle East policy tactics, editorialized, “As a moral matter, the stance of the United States is shameful. To stand by passively while hundreds of people seeking freedom are gunned down by their government makes a mockery of the U.S. commitment to human rights.”

The American government may be trying not to upset the already turbulent Muslim Middle East by provoking Iran, Syrian’s key ally, but if the Syrian uprising follows the fortunes of those in Egypt, Yemen and Tunisia, “the president’s unintelligible policy regarding the Middle East will…leave an indelible mar on his presidency,” Brown wrote.