Archive for October 26, 2010

Timeline of Iran’s nuclear program since October 2009

October 26, 2010

Timeline of Iran’s nuclear program since October 2009 – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

On October 1, 2009, Iran approved a plan top send 75% of its low-enriched uranium abroad; on October 26, 2010, it began loading its first nuclear reactor.

By Reuters

Below is a timeline on Iran’s nuclear program and Tehran’s negotiations with Western powers over the last year:

Oct. 1, 2009 – Iran meets six world powers in Geneva and approves in principle a plan to send 75 percent of its low-enriched uranium (LEU) to Russia and France, where it would be made into special fuel for a Tehran reactor making medical materials.

Bushehr - AP - Aug. 21, 2010 The reactor building of the Bushehr nuclear power plant is seen, just outside the southern city of Bushehr, Iran, Saturday, Aug. 21, 2010
Photo by: AP

Oct. 25 – U.N. nuclear experts inspect a newly disclosed enrichment plant being built near the Shi’ite holy city of Qom.

Oct. 30 – Iran tells the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) it wants fresh nuclear fuel for a reactor in Tehran before it will agree to ship some enriched uranium stocks to Russia and France, according to UN officials.

Nov. 18 – Iran says Tehran will not send enriched uranium abroad for further processing but would consider swapping it for nuclear fuel within its borders.

Nov. 19 – U.S. President Obama warns Iran of the consequences of its failure to respond to the nuclear deal.

Nov. 26 – Outgoing U.N. nuclear watchdog chief ElBaradei says Iran’s blockage of the proposal to divest it of possible nuclear bomb material is “disappointing”.

Nov. 27 – The IAEA’s 35-nation governing board censures Iran for developing the plant near Qom in secret and demands Iran freeze the project. Iran rejects the demand.

Nov. 29 – Iran says it plans to build 10 more enrichment sites.

Jan. 19, 2010 – Iran rejects key parts of the deal to send abroad for processing most of its enrichment material.

Feb. 2 – President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says Iran is ready to send enriched uranium abroad, apparently easing his position.

Feb. 9 – Iran begins making higher-grade nuclear fuel, enriched to a higher level of 20 percent, at Natanz facility.

Feb. 18 – An IAEA report suggests, bluntly and for the first time that Iran is actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability.

April 19 – Iran says it will start work on a new uranium enrichment plant, in addition to the Natanz and Qom sites.

April 27 – Brazil offers to mediate to help end the West’s diplomatic standoff with Iran over nuclear issues.

May 12 – UN resolutions aimed at increasing sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program “are not worth a penny” and Tehran will give no ground to pressure, Ahmadinejad says.

May 17 – Iran, Brazil and Turkey sign a nuclear fuel swap deal. Iran says it has agreed to transfer 1.2 tons (2,646 lb) of its low-enriched uranium to Turkey within a month in return for higher-enriched nuclear fuel for a medical research reactor.

May 31 – An IAEA report shows Iran’s low-enriched uranium (LEU) stockpile is up to 2.4 tons. So, even if the proposed 1.2 tons were shipped out now it would still leave Iran enough material for a nuclear weapon if enriched to higher levels.
June 9 – The U.N. Security Council votes to expand sanctions against Iran to hit its banking and other industries.

June 24 – The U.S. Congress approves tough new unilateral sanctions aimed at squeezing Iran’s energy and banking sectors, which could also hurt foreign companies doing business with Tehran. They are signed into law on July 1.

July 26 – The EU imposes tighter sanctions on Iran, aiming to block oil and gas investment and curtail its refining.

Iran says it is ready to hold talks on a nuclear fuel swap without conditions.

July 30 – Iran says it will never give up its right to refine uranium, but could suspend higher-level enrichment if a fuel swap can be agreed with foreign powers.

Aug. 6 – The Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) says Iran is now using extra equipment to enrich uranium more efficiently at its Natanz pilot plant, stepping up its nuclear work despite sanctions.

Aug. 21 – Iran begins setting up fuel assemblies at Bushehr plant.

Aug. 30 – Iran announces it will produce in a year the nuclear fuel needed for the medical isotope reactor in Tehran.

Sept. 6 – An IAEA report says Iran has told inspectors that it had accumulated around 2.8 tons of LEU, about 370 kg (816 lb) more than in May.

Sept. 29 – Bushehr will begin supplying energy in early 2011, a senior official says, signaling a delay of several months after the spread of Stuxnet, a global computer virus believed to have affected mainly Iran.

Oct. 18 – Iran is ready to return to nuclear talks “as soon as tomorrow” but only if the subject of the negotiations is made clear in advance, says Abolfazl Zohrevan, deputy secretary of the Supreme National Security Council.

Oct. 26 – Iran says it has begun loading fuel into the core of the Bushehr nuclear plant.

Obama aide: Iran prefers defiance and secrecy to transparency and peace

October 26, 2010

Obama aide: Iran prefers defiance and secrecy to transparency and peace – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

Dennis Ross says that Iran has been ‘surprised’ by magnitude of U.S. sanction and can no longer rely on international support.

By Natasha Mozgovaya

Iran prefers defiance and secrecy to transparency and peace, United States President’s special assistant Dennis Ross said on Monday.

Ross, who served as a special Middle East coordinator under former U.S. President Bill Clinton, spoke to attendees of the AIPAC National Summit in Hollywood, Florida.

“The U.S. government is building leverage through creative and persistent diplomacy to change the behavior of a government insistent on threatening its neighbors, supporting terrorism, and pursuing a nuclear program in violation of its international obligations,” said Ross.

An Iranian man shouts anti-U.S. and anti-Israel slogans during Friday prayers in Tehran An Iranian man shouts anti-U.S. and anti-Israel slogans during Friday prayers in Tehran on October 22, 2010.
Photo by: Reuters

Ross said that over the past two years Iran has preferred “defiance and secrecy to transparency and peace.” Ross referred to Iran’s lack of cooperation with inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

In June, Iran barred two IAEA experts from entering the country, accusing them of giving “false information” about its nuclear program. The decision was criticized by IAEA Director-General Yukiya Amano, who urged Iran to stop obstructing UN investigation of the country’s nuclear plan.

Ross said that Iran has been surprised by the magnitude of U.S. sanctions and the depth of support for them in the international community. “They can no longer rely on those in the international community they thought would block such measures on their behalf.”

Ross expressed hope that the international pressure will lead to a change in the behavior of Iran’s regime. “The door for diplomacy is still open and we certainly seek a peaceful resolution to our conflict with Iran.”

Ross spoke a day before Iran began loading fuel into the core of its Bushehr nuclear reactor, moving closer to the start-up of its first atomic plant.

He warned the U.S. would not tolerate further Iranian defiance and encouraged Iran’s leaders to “listen carefully to President Obama who has said many times, ‘we are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.'”

‘Syria helped Hezbollah amass some 40,000 missiles’

October 26, 2010

‘Syria helped Hezbollah amass some 40,000 missiles’ – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

Le Figaro details guerilla group’s military structure, and describes how weapons are transferred from Damascus into Lebanon.

By Haaretz Service

Hezbolah, Lebanon’s Iran- and Syria-backed guerilla organization that became a key player in the Beirut govermnent, has amassed some 40,000 missiles, the French daily Le Figaro reported Monday, saying that Damascus had a major role in replenishing the group’s arsenal after its 2006 war with Israel.

The report also shed new light on the structure of Hezbollah’s military wing.

Hezbollah youth holding Katyushas near Nasrallah portrait Young Hezbollah supporters holding mock ups of Katyusha rockets in front of a portrait of group leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah.
Photo by: AP

Le Figaro cited the United States as having observed that alliance in January, when its radar spotted 26 missiles M-6002 in the area between Damascus and Syria’s border with Lebanon.

According to Le Figaro, Hezbollah has to date more than 10,000 fighters, and that its weapons transport system is divided into three units: Unit 108 is responsible for transferring weapons and ammunition from Damascus to Hezbollah bases on the Lebanon border and near the Syrian airport; next comes Unit 112, which transports the weapons from those bases into Lebanon; third is Unit 100, which deals with deployment and training.

Satellite photos taken in March of last year and caught earlier this month show that the Syrian army has a Scud missile base near Damascus. While the images also suggest that Hezbollah activists are being trained in the Scuds’ use at the base, Syria denies reports that it has supplied the militant group with those weapons.

The photos can be seen by any web surfer on Google Earth. They show extensive construction at several military bases throughout Syria, including at one of the country’s three largest missile bases, located 25 kilometers northeast of Damascus, near the city of Adra.

The base is in a deep valley surrounded by 400-meter-high mountains. Concrete tunnels lead from the base into the mountains, where the Scuds are apparently stored.

The photos show five 11-meter-long missiles (the length of both the Scud B and the Scud C ) at the Adra base. Three are on trucks in a parking lot. Two others are in a training area where 20 to 25 people can be made out along with about 20 vehicles. One of the two missiles appears to be mounted on a mobile launcher; another is on the ground.

Show, Don’t Tell: WikiLeaks and Our War with Iran

October 26, 2010

Adam Chandler: Show, Don’t Tell: WikiLeaks and Our War with Iran.

One of the enduring pedagogical tactics of professors is the deployment of the phrase “Show, don’t tell.” It’s shorthand for a moment when there is too much exposition, too much explaining.

For example: instead of writing something like “As men with wooden stakes and kindling began approaching the congressional offices, the senator from Delaware became anxious,” try writing “As men with wooden stakes and kindling set a pyre outside her office, the Senator worried the top of her brow with a finger and looked slightly away from the window.” The anxiety in the second sentence is clearer this way, more potent. The message resonates more.

The same goes for the newest WikiLeaks scandal, one that shows (deftly), among a number of awful things, the extent to which the United States is currently at war with Iran. For some, this may not seem like news. From the Beirut bombing of a Marines barracks back in 1983 — financed by Iran, carried out by its Lebanese surrogate Hezbollah, sounded death knell for 241 American servicemen — to a number of incidents of kidnapping and violent incitement as well as Iran’s funding of pernicious causes and its infamous 2002 lumping in the “Axis of Evil,” it’s easy to believe we’re already in a proxy war with Iran. Or so we’ve been told.

But the recent analysis of WikiLeaks documents by major newspapers across the world, stemming from roughly four times as many reports as the July features published about Afghanistan and Pakistan, shows the wide-ranging ways in which Iran has played a hand in the killing of American soldiers and the assassination of Sunni politicians in Iraq. The documents also present information about Iran’s arming and training of Shiite militias to fight or kidnap coalition forces. And for the coup de grâce, the reports highlight specific incidents in which U.S. troops in Iraq have come under direct attack from Iranian forces.

Now that we’ve been shown the evidence and it resonates more than it did when our war with Iran was couched in rhetorical or philosophical terms, the question is what should we do? Does this mean the United States should formally declare war on Iran? No. That would be completely insane. Beyond the well-known implications of such a war and its scope, a declaration of war would only bolster an Iran that is economically and domestically weak and run by a cleric established looking for an outsider on which to further project conspiratorial misdirections through its state-run media.

What America really needs to do is get serious about Iran. We must bury the idea that the United States should be engaging Iran. Since President Obama made his famous campaign remark about sitting down with the Iranian leadership within a year of taking office (and without preconditions), the Iranian regime has: continued to advance its nuclear program and spiced up the rampant fatalism of Middle East governments with a dulcet note of brinksmanship, threatened to destroy a fellow UN member state, committed national electoral fraud, murdered unarmed protesters, muzzled or jailed all opposition media, staunched free speech, funded the growing Hezbollah stockpile of missiles beneath the noses of UN peacekeeping forces in Lebanon, and perpetuated some dangerous falsehoods about both gays and the Holocaust. In addition to the damning links provided by the WikiLeaks document release about Iranian mischief vis-à-vis Iraq, there is undoubtedly more to this litany, all in service of the doleful reality that there is no amount of dialogue that can bring this regime around.

Ultimately, the United States must form a more serious coalition to squeeze Iran politically and economically. The call for this coalition has practically become a hollow trope, but it’s become essential as the U.S.-led peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians continue. If President Obama can aggressively advance the cause of peace as well as coax Syria away from its alliance with Iran, the political gains Iran has made since the U.S. invasion of Iraq will be greatly cheapened. A peace deal would also help Sunni Arab states, deeply frightened of this new Iran, and make it easier to bring them into a coalition.

It won’t be easy. Even wars without bullets are tough to fight. But more sabre-rattling about Iran’s nuclear program will not help. Making a real impact on the landscape of the region will. It’s time to show, not just tell.

Iran begins loading fuel into core of first nuclear reactor

October 26, 2010

Iran begins loading fuel into core of first nuclear reactor – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

U.S. and allies says that Russian provision of fuel for Bushehr proves that Iran need not enrich uranium on its own.

By News Agencies

Iran began loading fuel into the core of its Bushehr nuclear reactor Tuesday morning, moving closer to the start-up of its first atomic plant.

Iranian and Russian engineers started moving nuclear fuel into the main reactor building in August but a reported leak in a storage pool delayed injection of the fuel into the reactor

Bushehr Iran nuclear facility Iranian technicians at work at the Bushehr Nuclear Plant in Iran, November 2009.
Photo by: AP

Iran says the Russian-built 1,000-megawatt nuclear plant will start producing energy in early 2011 after years of delays and that its launch shows the West is wrong to accuse it of seeking to develop atomic bombs.

The United States and its allies say the fact that Russia provides the fuel for Bushehr means that Iran does not need to enrich uranium itself, the part of the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program they are most worried about.

“Despite all efforts and policies of America and the European Union to put sanctions on Iran, the fuel of the Bushehr power plant will be loaded into its core tomorrow,” Iranian MP Alaeddin Boroujerdi was quoted as saying by official media.

Boroujerdi heads the Iranian parliament’s national security and foreign policy committee. Iranian news agencies said celebrations would be held to mark Tuesday’s event.

Iran insists it needs to enrich uranium — material which can also be used to make weapons if refined much further — to fuel future power stations designed to generate electricity and enable the country to export more of its gas and oil riches.

But Western powers believe Iran’s uranium enrichment is part of a covert weapons drive and have imposed increasingly tough sanctions on Tehran to force it to halt the work.

European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton has invited Iran for talks on its nuclear program in Vienna from Nov. 15 to 17. Iran has indicated it welcomes the offer of talks, but has not yet formally replied to the invitation.

Tehran is showing no sign of backing down in the dispute, pressing ahead with enrichment activity despite the sanctions.

Iran began fuelling Bushehr in August and officials have said the reactor will begin generating energy early next year, a delay of several months following the spread of a global computer virus believed to have affected mainly Iran.

Experts say that firing up the e1-billion plant will not take Iran any closer to building a nuclear bomb since Russia will supply the enriched uranium for the reactor and take away spent fuel which could be used to make weapons-grade plutonium.

“In theory, there are legitimate concerns that ostensibly civilian reactors can be used for nuclear weapons,” said research associate Ivanka Barzashka of the Washington-based Federation of American Scientists.

“In practice, using Bushehr for weapons will be very difficult,” she said, noting also that U.N. nuclear inspectors would detect any illicit diversion of nuclear material.

Iranian officials have confirmed the Stuxnet virus had hit staff computers at the Bushehr plant but had not affected major systems there. Security experts say the computer worm may have been a state-sponsored attack on Iran’s nuclear program and may have originated in the United States or Israel.

Iran says it plans to build 20 reactors in the next two decades, but Western analysts say this aim is unrealisti

 

.